Leaderboard

No. Quite the opposite. Its accepted that some of Paul's letters were not written by him. As Campion mentioned it, Revelations is attributed to John of Patmos, if you read his story, you realize its nonsense. Cross referencing the Gospels themselves and you find differences to the 'eye witness' testimonies. They can't be relied on as credible eye witnesses. Its unlikely any of the Gospel authors were literate, they were fishermen for instance, and John the Baptist was a 'wild man of the woods' there's no way he could have been responsible for his mystical and prosaic Gospel. The last paragraph of Matthew is widely accepted as being a later addition. Its largely agreed among scholars the oldest gospel, John, was written at least 70 years after the life of Jesus. Paul was writing shortly after Jesus's time, but Paul didn't actually meet Jesus. (If I remember correctly) He doesn't even mention his name, its always "the Christ' or 'my Christ /my Lord' etc. So it seems none of the Gospels were written by the disciples themselves or in the time when Christ was active.

I recently stumbled upon David Icke’s ideas around energy frequencies and how our bodies and consciousness may resonate with different vibrations. I’ve been considering the implications of that beyond just spiritual or metaphysical perspectives—like, can tuning into certain frequencies influence our mental well-being or even societal patterns? Would love to hear: Have any of you experimented with tuning or sound frequencies to feel more balanced or aligned? Do you think there's a connection between energy frequencies and large-scale events or shifts (collective consciousness, political movements, etc.)? Any reading or listening recommendations that explore this more deeply? Super curious to hear your thoughts and start diving deeper together. Thanks for having me here!

https://rumble.com/v70mfac-technocracy-roundtable-ai-medicine-mahamaba-wearables-and-convergence-expos.html

If you do a Google search for slavery in the modern world, you’ll invariably be funneled into websites like Wikipedia, the Economist, or the World Economic Forum, where they argue that modern forms of slavery include things like forced marriage and sexual exploitation. And while all these are true, the authors fail to mention the obvious Elephant in the room: Enslavement through debt, which makes everyone a slave. The sovereign debt crises that we are presently encountering have been brought about essentially by nations having been hoodwinked into accepting that all money must be issued by bankers as loans and that it must be repaid ultimately to the bankers with interest. This is a despicable trick and a devil’s contract because it’s mathematically impossible for the world community to pay back to the bankers the amount that was initially loaned plus the interest on the loan! The bankers and politicians who are operating this diabolical system of usury know this full well and have invented an economist’s newspeak language filled with euphemistic terms like ‘quantitative easing’ and ‘business cycle’ to camouflage the rape, plunder and misappropriation of the whole world that they are actually engaged in carrying out. By persuading the world to enter into unpayable debt to them these money-masters are making themselves the proprietary owners of the world and debt-slaves of everyone else in it. This grand-scale transfer of national wealth, power, and sovereignty into the elite hands is what we are beginning to witness in the tragic examples of Italy and Greece (for an explanation of this debt-scam see the video below). The NWO-bankster conspiracy has been as plain as the nose on Alan Greenspan’s face for decades. The conspiracy has been openly discussed and promoted by governments and the mainstream media. The banksters’ swindle works as follows: Over the course of many decades, the banksters (in collusion with corrupt politicians) have gradually engineered into existence a global system of finance whereby all money that’s created and issued to the nations must be created and issued by the banksters as loans, which the receiving nations must pay back to the banksters with interest. Now it’s impossible, of course, for the nations as a group to pay back more money to the banksters than they have already received as loans, so how can they pay back the interest on their loans as well as the loans themselves? Answer: They cannot as a group. Their only possible recourse under this ‘usury system’ of finance is to take out further loans from the banksters which will cover their outstanding debt from the previous loan and enable them to meet their envisaged financial needs over a specific period in future. So, each loan from the banksters to the world economy must be bigger than the previous one. This escalation of the global debt to the banksters is automatic and happens irrespective of whether it’s matched by any increases in global output of goods and services. This constant escalation of global indebtedness to the banksters is propelling them onto ever-higher levels of wealth by driving the world community down onto ever-lower levels of poverty and indebtedness to the bankster-community. This is an intentional objective of the scam and it’s the primary cause of the present global financial crisis which falsely justifies the endless ‘bail-outs’ and ‘austerity programmes’ that people are currently having to endure. The idea that taxation (and not just debt) is a modern form of slavery has also been raised by some people. Robert Nozick (Harvard philosopher) stated in 1974 that: “Taxation of earnings from labor is on a par with forced labor”, while Lysander Spooner (19th-century American legal theorist) stated in his 1870 book ‘Power and Market’ that: “Taking a man’s money without his consent is robbery. Taking a man’s money against his will, on the pretense that it will be used for his good, is both robbery and fraud”, while Frank Chodorov (American libertarian writer, Old Right individualist) stated in his 1959 book ‘The Rise and Fall of Societ’ that: “Taxation is robbery. It’s the taking of property by force”. According to former Congressman Ron Paul, the idea of tax, is questionable. Paul argues in the video here that forced taxation is tantamount to robbery. Paul argues that the real problem with forced taxation is that it’s based on the assumption that the government owns you, controls you, and essentially controls 100% of your income and they simply permit you to keep a certain percentage of what you’ve earned if you obey their rules. Paul notes that slavery can be defined as the involuntary confiscation of 100% of the product of the labor of another person. The essential question at issue then becomes, at what percentage of involuntary confiscation would no longer constitute slavery? If it were reduced to 75%? 25%? The answer, according to Paul, is that anything above 0% is a form of slavery because the product of your labor is still being confiscated against your will. Some countries that don’t have taxes include the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, and Oman, deciding to raise their money through other methods. In his book ‘For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization’ (1993), Charles Adams traces the role of taxation across the world, showing how excessive and hidden forms of taxation have contributed to the rise and fall of civilizations. Adams argues that modern states, much like ancient empires, employ not just visible taxes like income and property levies but also “hidden” taxes that are embedded in prices, trade restrictions, inflation, and corporate structures, which citizens fail to recognize as taxation. He suggests that when all these layers — direct taxes, indirect taxes (like VAT and excises), and implicit levies — are combined, the effective burden on individuals can climb to confiscatory levels, in some cases above 70% of income. His analysis emphasizes that this kind of cumulative taxation erodes liberty and prosperity over time, because it extracts far more from the population than headline tax rates suggest, creating a sense of arbitrary confiscation rather than a transparent social contract. Adams’ central warning is that hidden and layered taxation systems are politically convenient but socially corrosive, since citizens tolerate them without realizing the true extent of what they are paying. In his book ‘The Falsification of Science’, John Hamer argues that most if not all of the taxes people pay goes to paying off the debt to bankers. Hamer refers to taxation as one of the mechanisms through which populations are kept in economic subservience. In Hamer’s framework, taxes are not primarily for funding public services but for maintaining dependence on the state and financing the agendas of financial elites. He sometimes links taxation, debt, and monetary policy to what he calls “the enslavement of humanity through money”. Modern humans, despite the veneer of freedom and progress, are hypnotically enthralled by a carefully constructed system of distractions that echo the ancient Roman concept of “bread and circuses”. Television, mass entertainment, and professional sports have become the modern amphitheaters, serving not merely as harmless leisure but as mechanisms of pacification that keep people docile and unquestioning in the face of their own enslavement. The average person may work long hours, surrender a large portion of their earnings to taxation and debt, and endure a life of quiet frustration, but so long as they have access to streaming platforms, endless news cycles, and weekly doses of football, they rarely pause to examine the invisible chains that bind them. In this way, the spectacle functions as both an opiate and a cage: It provides enough stimulation to distract from the bleakness of economic servitude, while simultaneously normalizing the very structures that perpetuate it; stadiums filled with chanting crowds, televisions buzzing with drama, and social media feeds overflowing with celebrity gossip all operate in harmony to drain away the critical energy that might otherwise be directed toward questioning the legitimacy of authority or the injustice of unavoidable debt and questionable taxation. The tragedy lies in the fact that this hypnosis is voluntary; people willingly hand over their attention and passion to games and screens, mistaking them for fulfillment, while the true game — the struggle for genuine freedom — goes unnoticed. Possibly the most egregious technique of dulling the capacity of the populace to question power or notice their own exploitation is the fluoridation of water supplies. Most people assume that adding fluoride to public drinking water supplies is a good way to prevent cavities. It’s supposedly been endorsed by public health, dental, and medical organizations since it was introduced 75 years ago. However, there are growing concerns about fluoride as a developmental neurotoxin. In 2006, a report by the National Research Council acknowledged that fluoride exposure may be associated with adverse cognitive and endocrine outcomes. Fluoride’s ability to damage the brain is one of the most active areas of fluoride research today. Over 300 studies have found that fluoride is a neurotoxin (a chemical that can damage the brain). The video below lists the various scientific studies on fluoridated water and its potential impact on human health. A quote from journalist Chris Bryson (in ‘The Politics of Fluoridation’) is: “The Nazis experimented with fluoridation of water at Auschwitz and other camps to make prisoners docile”. Assuming such claims are true, one could argue that water fluoridation in the USA (and in certain other countries) may have served, in part, to promote compliance among the population and reduce resistance to progressively restrictive policies. Keep the masses unknowingly medicated with fluoridated water (and even toxic chemicals in our food), making them more docile, so they don’t realize their freedoms encroached upon. Over the years, we’ve seen the global power elite exert more control over people’s lives; David Icke calls it the “totalitarian tiptoe”. From CAGW, the brain-child of the UN’s Club of Rome and intended to act as a pretext for the worldwide implementation of Agenda 21, to the WHO Pandemic Agreement which gives the WHO “authority” over national health policy and pandemic decisions, to the latest UK’s Online Act (which similar acts being rolled out in other countries), which is being used to quash dissent and censor digital information. Perhaps most disturbing of all of them though, is the latest decisions by the UK government to roll out a mandatory digital ID. Dr. Yeadon has argued that a universal digital ID system poses serious risks of coercion and loss of autonomy. He claims that such systems could require people to show proof of vaccination, or otherwise comply with certain health mandates, as a condition for basic participation in everyday activities — accessing services, entering public spaces or using financial systems. If a digital ID is tied to one’s vaccination status or other health flags, then those who refuse or fail to meet those conditions might be excluded or penalized. He also contends that once such a system is put in place, it becomes nearly impossible to roll back; its permanence would enable ever-expanding control over people’s movements, transactions, and freedoms. He further warns that combining digital ID with other technologies or policies — such as central bank digital currencies, cashless payment systems, or mandatory health credentials, could create what he calls a “control grid”. In this envisioned system, almost every action — purchasing, working, medical care, travel, could be conditional on the status of one’s digital ID. When mainstream outlets discuss modern slavery — they focus on forced labor and coerced marriage. While real, these categories obscure a more universal form of enslavement: Debt. The modern monetary system is built on money issued by private central banks as loans, created from nothing, and burdened with interest. Because all money originates as debt, society as a whole can never fully repay both the principal and interest — it’s mathematically impossible. This structure guarantees perpetual indebtedness, funneling wealth and sovereignty from nations to the bankers. Greece and Italy serve as examples of how entire populations can be reduced to debt-slavery under this system. Taxation compounds the bondage. Thinkers from Lysander Spooner to Robert Nozick and Ron Paul have argued that taxation is indistinguishable from robbery and forced labor. Beyond economics, modern humans are pacified by distractions reminiscent of Rome’s “bread and circuses”. This pacification extends even to public health measures: The fluoridation of drinking water. Though promoted as beneficial for dental health, research has identified fluoride as a potential neurotoxin. Critics claim its widespread use may have subtle effects on cognition and compliance, echoing chilling historical associations with social control. In sum, the modern individual is not free but bound — by debt, by taxation, by distraction, and perhaps even by chemical means. The appearance of liberty masks a deeper servitude, one maintained not by physical chains, but by systems of control.

His comments appeared to tap into growing frustration within Conservative ranks following months of poor polling and internal division.

Got the first answer from S. Pavlarčík. They know about crannies in the area. He thinks Horak's story is a bluff and that more and more explorers have the same opinion as well as Slovak Speleological Society. He is interested in my discovery. I am going to send him more information today and discuss chances of something to be found there.

Yeah , I get your point. I am not from the UK so I can only imagine how the UK is doing today with all the CCTV, virtual walls, borders and too many people in crowded urban centers , with declining job oppertunities and landlords asking for insane housing fees Russia is holding all the cards now because after Libya plunged into chaos (thanks Hilary!) almost every sahel country faced a coup and millions of Africans are on the run for a variety of conflicts. You'll be surprised how many more refugees could boat to Europe in the years to come (because of new conflicts), with a little help from Wagner associates. I suspect they are playing both sides. Sending us Africans , and stirring up right wing extremist conspiracy theories such as replacement theory. They have been running psyops since the Tsarist era , remember who wrote that bullshit psyop "the Protocols"

I am almost certain they will let the Maccabi Tel Aviv fans attend the Aston Villa match in the end, they have most likely staged a ban and all this "controversy" to justify imposing a media blackout on the conduct of the Israeli fans because "anti-Semitism".

As a tourist you can’t leave marked routes. If you would like to go into wilderness full of bears you need official guide or official authorization for some scientific research. I know from Erik that many people don’t respect rules and risk penalty because routes are usually overwhelmed and nature around is very beautiful. It’s different experience to be far away from people in the middle of forests. Yep, it’s the same hole. Here is another photo. I hesitate to make too much stuff public. It is too early. Besides photos I have precise gsp coordinates, orthophotos with marked spots where I took the photos and of the position of the cave and 3D model of the area with and without trees. Other drawings from Horak’s diary can be found nearby, but again I don’t want to reveal to much details. Small picture resembling stump actually matches the shape of big rock above the hole. Here is the storm that prevented us from examining rocks inside. It was dangerous to stay there any longer. https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkova_dolina 11. júla 2024 zišla bahenná lavína (úlomkotok) zo Žlebínskeho sedla k Rígeľskému potoku. Zavalila turistický prístrešok, kde zabila 2 a zranila niekoľko ďalších turistov.[2][3] On July 11, 2024, a mudslide (debris flow) descended from the Žlebínske sedlo to the Rígeľský potok stream. It covered a tourist shelter, killing 2 and injuring several other tourists.[2][3]

Digital ID protest London Oct 18th 2025

Let's take our country back': Robert Jenrick says Brits are 'fighting' decline saying Tories must get behind 'collapse of the old order' Robert Jenrick urged Tories to 'take our country' back today as he warned the 'old order' is collapsing - and took a brutal shot at 'activist' judges. In his keynote speech to party conference, the shadow justice secretary said Brits were sick of decline and wanted to 'fight'. Snip He said: 'The collapse of the old order is in sight. A new one is coming because the British people are fighting back and, conference, there's absolutely nothing that Labour can do to stop them. 'The only choice, the only choice we have is whether we have the spirit to fight with them.' Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15169915/Lets-country-Robert-Jenrick-says-Brits-fighting-decline-saying-Tories-collapse-old-order.html