Leaderboard

Rachel Reeves skewered by Liz Truss on GB News with 'out of touch' jibe Liz Truss appeared on GB News on Friday evening and didn't hold back in her distaste for Chancellor Rachel Reeves. Former Prime Minister Liz Truss has made it glaringly obvious that she didn't want to come face-to-face with Rachel Reeves. Speaking on GB News' The Late Show LIVE with Bev Turner, Truss was told that Reeves was also in town, prompting the former PM to say: "I managed to avoid her, I'm pleased to say." Truss explained that she had discovered they would be in the same location while she was on the plane. She said: "I'd forgotten to be honest, it was the IMF. I'm not a fan of the IMF, the world bank and all these international bodies that are out of touch frankly with the rest of the world. "So it was no surprise that Rachel Reeves, who is one of their true believers, was here." She was asked about her references to the "deep state", adding: "You've talked about the deep state, you've talked about how you were hounded out of office by forces beyond your control. Is she part of that?" Truss added: "Correct, she is." She went on to explain that it was the Bank of England who were responsible for the market crisis in 2022, which she said they admitted. The former PM claimed they were "in cahoots with the IMF, the world bank, Joe Biden," adding: "And Rachel Reeves is part of that way of thinking." But she fumed that Reeves' support of more taxes, more regulation, net zero is a model that "isn't working". Truss claimed that the only country moving ahead is the US. She claimed there is a problem with the "left-wing economists being in charge". Link - https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/2122972/rachel-reeves-skewered-liz-truss-gb-news-out-of-touch

O.K HERE THEY ARE, TWO OF THE COUNTRY'S BIGGEST TITS! FEATHERING THEIR OWN NESTS, AS USUAL!

And we all know how the Aussie govt behaved during "Covid".....no surprise they're on board early.

I don't know either, and I too would appreciate if anyone has a definitive answer! Because to me, like with most things on this scale, it all sounds like 'virtual money', and thus is all part of the global financial scam that is sucking all the wealth from the world. It's like when we hear about the UK government 'borrowing money' in order to meet spending commitments. But it's never explained exactly who this money is being 'borrowed' from, and thus who it has to be paid back to, with interest of course. The most sinister aspect to the IMF of course is this nugget: Also known as 'fall in line with the Agenda'

Course they are. There is no actual UK government anymore. They don't serve the British people or give a toss about them.

The OP was right to include 'Worldwide' in the title. It appears there is a global effort to roll this out. Starmer and Labour are in the pockets of the Globalists. .

Jewish lawyer is questioned by police over wearing a Star of David necklace that 'antagonised' pro-Palestinian protesters during demo By CIARAN FOREMAN, TRAINEE REPORTER 18:59 18 Oct 2025, updated 19:02 18 Oct 2025 A Jewish lawyer was questioned by police after wearing a Star of David necklace which officers claimed 'antagonised' pro-Palestine supporters during a demonstration. Officers interrogated the man at Hammersmith Police Station in west London over the silver 2cm Judaic symbol after he was arrested for alleged Public Order breaches on August 29. At one point, the questioning detective says officers noted in their statements that they believed the 'presence' of the Star of David could cause 'offence' to those who had gathered at the protest. The lawyer, a man in his 40s, was arrested outside the Israeli embassy in Kensington, where a pro-Palestine march had descended that evening. He claims to have been acting as an independent spectator, watching the protest for illegal behaviour by participants and to observe how police responded to challenges on the ground. However, the Metropolitan Police say he had allegedly 'gone beyond observing to provoking' pro-Palestinian supporters and was arrested on suspicion of violating conditions that had been put in place to keep opposing protest groups apart. The man was then reportedly detained for nearly 10 hours at the station before being released at around 4.30am the following day. The Met say their investigation into the incident is continuing, but the lawyer - who has chosen to remain anonymous over fears for his safety - has accused the police of trying to 'criminalise the wearing of a Star of David'. Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15204791/Jewish-lawyer-questioned-Star-David-necklace-pro-Palestine-protest.html So let's get it straight, the man was arrested on the streets of Britain, for wearing a religious symbol that offended a mob, protesting for a proscribed terrorist group, possibly chanting 'from the river to the sea' and 'death to the IDF' He offended them, and its the Police duty to protect the protesters from being offended while calling for the destruction of Israel. Ok then.

In the 90s we where told: keep a good distance from TV screen! Today!!!! WTF

Politicians and Nappies need to be changed regularly, for the same reason!!!

Government 'doing everything' to overturn Maccabi Tel Aviv fan ban from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5ylxn8g2y2o Is Sir Keir suggesting that Aston Villa FC and the city of Birmingham are 'anti-semitic'? Funny how ALL the establishment political parties - including Reform - are all singing from the same hymn sheet and demanding that the ban be overturned. The honourable exception bizarrely is the Green Party. Anyway, so what's the fuss all about and what are the safety concerns? How delightful! A war in the Middle East spilling out all across Europe. If the ban is overturned, it's not hard to see what will happen on the streets of Birmingham that evening. And it won't be Aston Villa 'fans' scrapping with those from Tel Aviv, no, the arriving fans will be warmly welcomed by the 'Free Palestine' activists, ready to cause a scene and a situation that results in curbs on freedom and liberty...

Due to ongoing scrutiny about his association with Jeffrey Epstein and following discussions with King Charles and Prince William, Prince Andrew, whilst he will remain a prince, has relinquished his honours and titles including as Duke of York. He continues to deny the allegations but states that the accusations are distracting from the work of the Royal Family. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgqlyw9g7weo Prince Andrew gives up his title as Duke of York

All it will achieve will be to make it harder for "Brits" to work legally, tanking the economy, whilst the black market will doubtless continue to thrive. Illegal immigration is a racket and one which the authorities seem to turn a blind eye to - digital ID won't change that.

The Government has announced plans to introduce a digital ID system which is fit for the needs of modern Britain. We are committed to making people’s everyday lives easier and more secure, to putting more control in their hands (including over their own data), and to driving growth through harnessing digital technology. We also want to learn from countries which have digitised government services for the benefit of their citizens, in line with our manifesto commitment to modernise government. Currently, when UK citizens and residents use public services, start a new job, or, for example, buy alcohol, they often need to present an assortment of physical documents to prove who they are or things about themselves. This is both bureaucratic for the individual and creates space for abuse and fraud. This includes known issues with illegal working and modern slavery, while the fragmented approach and multiple systems across Government make it difficult for people to access vital services. Further, there are too many people who are excluded, like the 1 in 10 UK adults who don’t have a physical photo ID, so can struggle to prove who they are and access the products and services they are entitled to. What's not been explained yet is exactly how a 'digital ID' will "tackle illegal migration". Because requiring a valid (paper) passport and/or visa doesn't seem to be stopping illegal immigrants arriving on our shores in small boats. Dubbing it "BritCard" means it's aimed at British citizens. If you're not from the UK, how does one 'apply' for a UK digital ID? Who issues them? There's already a black market out there for fake passports and driving licences, as well as other forms of ID. I haven't seen any for a while but they were being openly advertised a while back on social media through paid-for advertising! If the government makes some wild claims about "we'll turn anyone away from our border who doesn't have a valid digital ID" then you'll know this is all just bullshit, because they already have the power to do this, but are choosing not to. Just think about the rigmarole you have to go through when arriving back in this country legally from a holiday/trip abroad, while having a perfectly valid UK passport.

Of course, all of this can be done without bringing in digital ID. Banks require ID to open a bank account. "Oh! ... You're not British. No bank account for you." Police, when making arrests for someone going on a stabbing rampage can ... Oh wait. They don't do that anymore do they. Well, if they did, they could check IDs. ICE are the ones being terrorized. Being shot at and having bricks (the Soros ones) hurled through their windshields. It is the Podesta plan. Fomented in case Trump ever won the Presidency for the third time. Start a civil war. Stage one is to demonize ICE. Then have a shooter shoot a load of immigrants and blame it on ICE or perhaps white supremacists. I suspect Trump may be ready to invoke the Insurrection Act. That is the reason Hegseth called the generals in. IMO.

The funny thing is that Robert Jenrick made these comments back in March, and while there was some media attention back then, it's funny how all the left-wing apologists have somehow started frothing at the mouth, and made this a 'big story' once again. from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx23dn52xydo "Well he would say that..." "White people" does of course include Romanians, Albanians, Poles, Ukrainians, etc etc. We went to Handsworth and nobody could work out what Robert Jenrick's problem was from: https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/went-handsworth-nobody-could-work-32629253 Well that's nice. That's just one of numerous stories I've come across in the last couple of days in local media, with the usual aim of making out that areas like Handsworth are 'wonderfully diverse', and people like Jenrick are nothing more than 'ignorant racist bigots'. This is classic social engineering, the media stirring the pot and all that. When you have "more ethnic minorities than white people" in any area, they are no longer a 'minority'! Anyway, while the local rags have done their best to proclaim Handsworth as a bastion of diversity and all that is good in Birmingham, we then have this: Man attacked on Soho Road in broad daylight as police search for attacker from: https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/man-attacked-soho-road-broad-32631636 Isn't diversity wonderful?

On the subject of 'divisive language', on this occasion, I would agree with what Robert Jenrick said, and he made the same valid observation as anyone would if they were to walk around areas of Birmingham such as Small Heath, Sparkbrook and Alum Rock for themselves. Jenrick says no regrets over 'worst integrated' comment from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy85zlpwne6o Now I don't know much about Handsworth as I tend not to go there very often but sometime last year I found myself over on the Soho Road whilst out and about, and as a 'factual observation' he's not actually wrong. I didn't see many other white people either, and most of the shops there cater to the local Asian and Afro-Caribbean communities, as well as the usual slew of 'European' shops serving the needs of Polish and Romanian locals. Parts of areas like Handsworth, just as much as parts of areas like Small Heath, Sparkbrook and Alum Rock, HAVE become 'ghettoised'. There's not actually much in the way of 'diversity' really I completely agree. Yet apparently, to make these kinds of observations now, make you automatically a "racist". Where I work in Sparkbrook, apart from the few people who work at long-established businesses in our neighbourhood, the only other 'white people' I see in the vicinity of the Stratford Road are drug-addled junkies who make no meaningful contribution to society. I've been working there for years, and this never bothered me, and it's only recently that I've started to feel 'uncomfortable'. Not that I feel 'personally threatened', but just that I can see a very 'ghettoised community' that is very much 'cut off' from the rest of society. The likes of Richard Parker and other Labour party members will no doubt go off to Handsworth or Sparkhill and have a 'marvellous curry', or something like that which cements their notion that "everything is wonderful". But what they don't see is how crime and violence escalates as these areas become 'more diverse', which just means that 'more white people move away because they're fed up'.

This is what we are up against. Boils my piss.

Got to be ways we can put pressure on these twats. I know his a puppet but his such a nob Starmer. So arrogant. Such a jumped up scumbag.

Well I have spoken to a load of people today and I’m amazed at how many are either up for this ID idea or simply don’t care. If it happens it’s the start of the end game. Like I have said before it’ll be used to allow you to board buses and trains. But if you’re not fully jabbed, or have not done your bit for climate change or maybe even some anti social behaviour report (being part of a protest or sending a tweet…) you ain’t getting on! They could even use it so you are only allowed to purchase things in a certain postcode…. Dark days indeed. Hopefully it doesn’t get passed and we can all sleep a little easier…. For a while at least.

I agree. It's a shame. I like Germany. I have always had a good time whenever I visited, and the people were always very friendly to me. They have a good sense of humor very similar to the English. It's sad to see they have let the tyranny go so far. Though they are beginning to push back. And the problem with Holocaust denial is what exactly is denial. If I say, 'you know what I don't think 6 million Jews were killed. I think it was more like 600,000'. Is that denial? What if I say 3 million? 5 million? 5,999,999? Can I be jailed for that opinion? What if my opinion is completely in good faith, but I got the facts wrong? Mistranslated a document. Easy to do. Just like David Icke is the canary in the coal mine, so is Holocaust denial. Get away with that and then the tyrants can start censoring other unwelcome views. Such as saying I think Islam is a violent religion. See what you've made me do? I won't be allowed in England now. As you know, the reason they slipped this through Germany and Austria first is that they could prey on people's guilt.

https://www.christian.org.uk/news/aviva-funds-group-promoting-trans-ideology-to-primary-school-children Aviva funds group promoting trans ideology to primary school children Aviva has been criticised for funding The Proud Trust, an organisation that distributes controversial ‘trans-affirming’ RSE resources to primary schools.