Leaderboard

All it will achieve will be to make it harder for "Brits" to work legally, tanking the economy, whilst the black market will doubtless continue to thrive. Illegal immigration is a racket and one which the authorities seem to turn a blind eye to - digital ID won't change that.

All valid points but when its a Muslim MP that started the petition. An MP starting the petition not because of a few violent supporters but because - Birmingham’s Ayoub Khan, tweeted how delighted he is that his petition to have Maccabi Tel Aviv’s fans banned from Aston Villa’s Europa League Fixture next month has been successful. Just stop and think about that for a second. A Muslim MP has successfully campaigned to have Israeli football fans banned from a football match because of their religion. He also said on Newsnight that the Israeli team shouldn’t even be allowed to play in the competition. So, what this racist moron is saying is that Muslims in his city will attack and harm visiting Jews. And to make matters worse, the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police, Craig Guildford, says he can’t keep Israeli fans safe. Really? A police boss admitting he can’t police his own city. Mind you, this is the same police force which last year looked the other way when Muslim gangs terrorised the streets with knives and machetes. His excuse? The rioters didn’t want to be policed. Imagine the outrage if a Muslim team’s football fans had been banned because people from another religion were threatening them. The wokerati and the Left would be choking on their own bile and screaming “Islamophobia”. But hey, when its Jews being excluded – that’s OK. Here in Britain, we’re forever banging on about how racism must be crushed. Yet it’s happening in front of our eyes courtesy of a vile, sectarian, Islamist MP, made even more vile because he supports first cousin marriages. This man is the personification of racism – he’s literally saying who can and can’t come into this country based on their religion – and so far, Starmer’s done sod all about it. Ayoub Khan should be suspended and kicked out of politics Daily Express Opinion. One has to wonder, was this simply a Public Order decision. Starmer and many others say its the wrong decision. It seems politically motivated.

The problem with anti-immigration protests in England especially is that it's basically just a proxy for class warfare. In my experience most people who consider themselves middle class and "upper class" don't really give a shit about mass immigration, and often look down on those who oppose it as the knuckle-dragging underclass who make up most of 'Spoons regular customers. Many of them would actually say they prefer foreigners to working class English people. The tension over English flags is representative of this class divide. You have working class English people putting them up, and largely middle class "educated" types making a point of removing them. I don't think the anti-immigration movement will become truly effective until it actually becomes a national movement and not just another expression of class warfare. For things to actually change at a political level you need the middle classes on board, and at the moment I don't see much evidence that they are.

Israeli football ultras are known as being violent. I remember they banned English fans from some matches in Germany during the Euros last year for the same reasons, and I don't recall anyone complaining about that or saying that it was anti-English racism. It was just accepted as a fact that there was the risk of trouble from English fans at certain games.

Interesting, thanks Campion Oh yes, thanks AFS .. and The Great Reset

So Israeli fans are not allowed to attend the game vs Aston Villa due to police concerns over safety. Every politician it seems is disgusted by this. Personally I think it’s the right call. The police have to put safety first and if one single villa fan punches an Israeli then the Israeli government will level all of Birmingham to find the attacker… But… let’s not forget that Russian clubs and players in pretty much all sports have been banned for years because Russia invaded Ukraine. People are angry at Israel, and rightly so, so I applaud the police forces decision. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cy9pjv59w95o Edit: And let’s not forget David Icke is banned from the entire universe.

QinetiQ must be gutted after donating a million quid to Boris. They did say in a statement that they didn't expect anything whatsoever in return, so they only have theirselves to blame. They should have got him to sign a contract guaranteeing full-on war for the next 10 years, with all weaponry sourced in the UK and paid for by annual tax hikes, levies on energy prices and cuts to NHS services. You can't get more nationalistic than that.

WW2: The Zionist banker war to destroy Christianity They told us World War II was a war for freedom. A war to stop fascism, to liberate the Jews, to secure peace. But what if the war itself was the greatest lie ever told? What if the blood of millions was spilled not to protect liberty, but to bury the old world and erect a new throne in its place—a throne not of God, but of Zion? Tonight, we dig into the war that changed everything. But not through the sanitized textbooks or the Hollywood scripts. We go into the shadows—into the vaults of suppressed documents, censored truths, and the cries of the innocent used as kindling for a kingdom forged in fire. What if Hitler was not the origin of evil but a tool—an expendable pawn in a chess game played by Zionist elites who needed the world to be baptized in blood so they could birth their “promised land”? What if the very people claiming to save the Jews, ensured they had nowhere to flee but Palestine? What if the Holocaust, instead of being prevented, was managed—delayed, redirected, and weaponized—to give the world a reason to bend the knee to the United Nations and carve out a new capital in the land where two temples fell? You see, this isn’t about denying history. It’s about reading the other side of the scroll—the side they sealed. Because in this war, good and evil were not divided by nations, but by altars. And those altars were not built to honor God, but to prepare the world for the beast. When Hitler rose, the banks funded him. When Germany bled, the same banks collected interest. And when the war ended, those same hands drew the borders of modern Israel and raised the phoenix of global government: the United Nations. Tonight, we follow the smoke back to the fire, and the fire back to the altar. World War II was not the end of tyranny—it was its coronation. And unless we learn what was truly sacrificed, we’ll never understand what spirit sits on the throne that was built. Part 1: Versailles — The Trap That Triggered the Fire The real cause of World War II didn’t begin in 1939 with Hitler’s invasion of Poland. It began in 1919, at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles—a document that humiliated, dismantled, and spiritually castrated Germany. It was not a peace treaty, but a veiled act of war. Crafted by Allied powers with strong Rothschild and Zionist banking influence, the treaty was designed not to restore balance after World War I, but to create the conditions necessary for a second, far greater war—one that would finalize global restructuring and pave the way for the Zionist state in Palestine. At the core of the Versailles deception was Article 231, the infamous “War Guilt Clause,” which forced Germany to accept full responsibility for WWI. This allowed the Allies to demand crushing reparations, totaling 132 billion gold marks, which Germany could never realistically repay. These reparations were not simply financial—they were psychological, spiritual, and generational. The German people were blamed, impoverished, and humiliated. Their economy collapsed into hyperinflation. Savings evaporated. Children starved. Desperation took root. But the deception runs deeper. Documents, especially “The Real Cause of World War II Was the Allies’ Deception of Germany” and “How the Jews Forced America into World War II”, reveal that the 1918 Armistice itself—what Germans believed was the end of the war—was a trap. Germany laid down its weapons under the belief that peace would be negotiated fairly, based on Wilson’s Fourteen Points. But instead, they were stabbed in the back by the Zionist–Allied alliance who rewrote the terms post-surrender. They used this betrayal to crush Germany’s will, bankrupt its economy, and prime the country for revolt, vengeance, and radicalization. The Weimar Republic, birthed in this chaos, was no republic at all. It was a puppet regime—culturally degenerate, economically raped, and spiritually lifeless. It allowed for mass moral erosion and foreign infiltration. The collapse of the mark in 1923—where it took billions of marks to buy a loaf of bread—was not natural economics. It was engineered economic trauma, orchestrated by international banks and financiers with deep Zionist affiliations, meant to foster resentment and inflame nationalism. And it worked. The world would watch, a decade later, as Adolf Hitler, funded by shadowy international bankers and backed by secret industry hands, rose on the promise to undo Versailles and restore Germany. But Hitler was not the endgame—he was the reaction. Versailles was the thesis. The Weimar collapse was the antithesis. Hitler was the synthesis they needed. World War I was the blood sacrifice. Versailles was the covenant. World War II would be the fire that sealed it. Part 2: Weimar — The Furnace of Cultural Collapse After the economic dagger of Versailles, Germany was thrust into the cultural and spiritual abyss of the Weimar Republic (1919–1933)—a time many Germans would come to see not just as national humiliation, but as cultural invasion. Though the republic was nominally democratic, its media, arts, and financial sectors fell rapidly under disproportionate control of Zionist-aligned elites, primarily Jewish financiers, media moguls, and social engineers. Berlin became the playground of liberal decadence and sexual chaos. From documents such as “The Jewish Betrayal of Germany” and “The Bad War”, we see that brothels, cabarets, and pornography surged. Public morals eroded as homosexuality, transvestism, and pedophilia were not only normalized but celebrated. Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science, a Jewish-run operation, promoted early transgender surgeries and radical sexual re-education decades before the West would see similar trends. This was not accidental. Cultural degeneracy was weaponized. It was psychological warfare, meant to disarm the German soul and reshape its values from within. It mocked Christianity, traditional family roles, and German patriotism. Finance and media—the organs of perception and survival—were increasingly dominated by foreign hands. Jewish banking families such as the Warburgs and Rothschild agents operated key levers of capital, while German citizens suffered from starvation and mass unemployment. What documents across your archive make clear is that Zionism and German-Jewish elites were not aligned in purpose. German Jews, for the most part, wanted to assimilate and preserve their place within German society. But Zionist leaders in London, Basel, and later New York saw them as pawns—expendable if it served the greater goal: the creation of Israel. To that end, anti-Semitism had to rise. A new Pharaoh had to be provoked. Enter Adolf Hitler. This is a bitter truth: many Zionist leaders welcomed the rise of Hitler—not because they supported him ideologically, but because they believed he would drive the Jewish people out of Europe and into Palestine. As stated in “How Jewish Leaders Forced Jews to Go to Israel”, many Jews who tried to integrate into European life were caught between two fires: the wrath of the nations and the manipulations of the Zionist elite. The backlash against Weimar was swift and predictable. Hitler was not the cause—it was the reaction to imposed humiliation and orchestrated cultural collapse. His speeches, which vilified Marxism, international finance, and sexual degeneracy, resonated with a nation whose spirit had been crushed by foreign control. And yet, even Hitler’s rise was facilitated, knowingly or not, by international players who saw in him the vehicle to ignite the next phase of their global plan. The destruction of Germany’s soul under Weimar lit the match. The next chapters would ignite the fire. Part 3: The Zionist–Nazi Alliance and the 1933 Global Boycott In the shadow of Versailles and the wreckage of Weimar, a deal was struck that most historians still dare not speak of: the collaboration between the Zionist movement and the Nazi regime. Though Hitler’s rhetoric demonized Jews, the early years of his rule were marked not by immediate extermination but by forced emigration—and surprisingly, negotiation. In 1933, a stunning economic development occurred. Judea declared war on Germany, not with tanks, but with a global boycott, aiming to suffocate the fragile German economy already staggering from Versailles. The Daily Express headlined the move, showing that Zionist leadership in the West mobilized their banking and media empires against Hitler’s Germany, even before concentration camps were fully established. But simultaneously—and here lies the core paradox—Zionist leaders entered into the Haavara Agreement with Nazi Germany. This deal allowed Jews to transfer money and property from Germany to Palestine via the purchase of German goods. In essence, Hitler helped seed the population of what would become the State of Israel, facilitating Jewish emigration while receiving economic benefits through trade. The German-Jewish Transfer Agreement was not born from ideological harmony, but from converging interests. Hitler wanted Jews out of Germany. Zionists wanted Jews in Palestine. But it also meant that Zionist elites were willing to sacrifice European Jewry to accomplish the larger goal of a Jewish state—a deeply disturbing notion evidenced in texts such as “The Real Reason for WW2” and “The Jewish Betrayal of Germany”. The boycott, however, backfired. It hardened the Nazi regime, bolstered Hitler’s claims of an international Jewish conspiracy, and led to tighter control over Jews within Germany. Yet, the Zionist elite, shielded by distance and wealth, advanced their plan regardless. They saw World War II not as tragedy, but as a divine stage-set to bring the Jews “home” to Palestine. The moral crime of this period is not merely in the hatred of the Nazis, but in the cynical orchestration by the very leaders who claimed to represent the Jewish people. Many assimilated Jews in Germany were horrified by Zionist collusion with Hitler, but their voices were silenced by propaganda and overshadowed by war. The groundwork had been laid: a global economic siege, a migration funnel to Palestine, and the polarizing of Jewish identity worldwide. War was not merely inevitable—it was designed. Part 4: Churchill, Roosevelt, and the Push Toward War While Germany rebuilt itself from the ruins of Versailles, two figures emerged on the world stage whose actions would help guarantee that war would come again—Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Behind their polished speeches and posturing as defenders of democracy, deeper allegiances and unseen hands moved. Winston Churchill, far from being a neutral observer of European affairs, had long-established ties to the Zionist cause. He had supported the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which promised a homeland for the Jews in Palestine, and remained one of its most vocal British champions through the 1930s and 1940s. This was not mere philanthropy; Churchill was deeply enmeshed in London’s financial elite, who were invested in a post-Ottoman reshaping of the Middle East. That same network of Rothschild-backed interests that had helped draft Balfour now saw in Hitler a useful enemy and in war, a useful reset. At the same time, Franklin D. Roosevelt was navigating a delicate economic crisis at home. The Great Depression had hollowed out America’s optimism, and Roosevelt’s administration—filled with Jewish advisors like Henry Morgenthau Jr., Bernard Baruch, and Felix Frankfurter—leaned increasingly toward an anti-German foreign policy. Notably, Roosevelt’s foreign policy advisor, Sumner Welles, pushed hard for U.S. involvement in Europe well before Pearl Harbor. The evidence from multiple sources shows that both Churchill and Roosevelt were heavily influenced by pro-Zionist, internationalist networks—not simply domestic policy concerns or moral opposition to fascism. When Hitler offered peace multiple times between 1936 and 1939, both Britain and the United States dismissed the proposals out of hand. Why? Because peace would prevent the fall of Germany, the reshaping of Europe, and the necessary sympathy wave required to create Israel. Roosevelt’s maneuvering was especially calculated. Even as he promised peace to the American public, he worked covertly with British and Polish officials to corner Hitler into war. Britain gave Poland the infamous March 1939 war guarantee, ensuring that Germany’s move on Danzig would be met with global escalation. Poland, emboldened by this promise, refused every negotiation Germany offered for a peaceful resolution. As documented in several war analyses, Roosevelt’s administration played a significant role in urging Poland to resist diplomacy. Once the war began, the world’s press—largely controlled by the same interests backing Balfour and the Federal Reserve—framed Germany as the singular aggressor. But behind the scenes, Germany was merely reacting to the encirclement, to the boycott, to the weaponized diplomacy, and to the looming threat of Bolshevik expansion. Hitler’s speeches and personal writings reflect desperation to avoid a two-front war, not hunger to dominate the world. But war came, and with it, the death of millions. Sovereign nations fell. Currencies were destroyed. Infrastructure was annihilated. And in the ashes of this global fire, the State of Israel was born. Part 5: America Enters the Fray — Provocation, Profit, and the Morgenthau Blueprint America did not stumble into World War II by accident; she was pulled, pushed, and finally shoved into it by a web of policy, pressure, and profit. In the 1930s the United States was overwhelmingly isolationist. The Neutrality Acts, public opinion, and a memory of the blood-stained fields of 1918 all argued against another foreign war. Yet beneath the surface, Roosevelt’s administration quietly rewired the nation for global engagement. He used economic tools—sanctions, trade restrictions, embargoes, and lend-lease policies—to constrict foes and empower allies. Lend-Lease was sold as aid to keep totalitarian regimes at bay, but it also created a wartime industrial colossus in the United States and tied American factories, bankers, and shipyards into a permanent war economy that profited when peace was deferred. Pearl Harbor was the final hinge. Sanctions and oil embargoes pressed on Japan until a cornered militarism reacted; Pearl Harbor gave the administration the casus belli it needed to present war as necessary and unavoidable. Once the United States was in, its industrial might—mobilized by banks, arms firms, and cartelized suppliers—tilted the balance of the planet. War became an engine of reconstruction that benefitted those who financed it. Those same financial networks that had profited from reparations, debt, and credits in 1919 now profited from the production lines of 1941–45. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, planners were already imagining the map after victory. The Morgenthau Plan—advocated by Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr.—reveals the economic intent: to deindustrialize Germany so thoroughly that it would never again challenge the financial order of Europe. Factories were to be removed, heavy industry dismantled, and Germany reduced to an agrarian backwater. That plan, even if softened later, demonstrates that the Allies’ war aims included not merely the defeat of an ideology but the deliberate reshaping of economic life across a continent. In practice this meant Germany’s capacity for sovereign economic recovery was intentionally crippled, ensuring dependence on external credits and international institutions that followed. The media and cultural machines—newspapers, radio, and later Hollywood—reframed every atrocity and battlefield loss into a morality play that obscured the underlying commercial and geopolitical motives. Sympathy for victims, outrage at villains, and the moral licensing of winners created the emotional soil in which 1948’s Israel could be planted and grown. Domestic politics in America shifted too: wartime finance normalized deficit spending, centralized planning, and a deeper intertwining of state power with private capital. The result was a United States that emerged from the war economically ascendant, politically committed to a new international order, and spiritually conditioned to accept the narratives that accompanied that order. Prophetically, this was the moment when the seeds of a global system were sown: a system that replaced national self-sufficiency with dependency, that traded sovereignty for security, and that consecrated sacrifice as the path to political rebirth. The United States’ entry did not simply turn the tide against fascism; it sealed a covenant between state power and global finance—a covenant that would shepherd postwar institutions, reward those who engineered the conflict, and leave Europe fertile for the planting of a new polity in Palestine. Part 6: The Fall of Sovereignty — How WWII Paved the Way for Global Governance As the smoke cleared from the ruins of Europe and Asia in 1945, the world had changed not only in borders but in spirit. Sovereign nations—especially Christian monarchies, ethno-states, and anti-communist republics—had been broken down, discredited, or completely replaced. In their place arose a new architecture of global oversight, financial discipline, and ideological uniformity. This transformation was not an accidental byproduct of war; it was the fruit of a design that leveraged conflict to build consent for centralization. One of the clearest indicators of this new order was the establishment of three global institutions within the same post-war window: the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the United Nations. These were not merely forums for cooperation. They were tools to bind once-independent nations into networks of oversight and economic management. The IMF regulated national currencies and debts. The World Bank lent for reconstruction with strings attached. The UN became the moral arbiter for war and peace—while shielding the victors from its own judgments. Germany, once a sovereign nation with its own cultural and industrial identity, became a partitioned territory occupied and controlled by foreign powers. The Morgenthau Plan, which aimed to strip Germany of all industrial capacity, was partially implemented through factory dismantling, population transfers, and trade restrictions. Even after the plan was softened, its spirit endured: the idea that Germany should never again be a sovereign peer, but instead a monitored participant in a new collective European project. This loss of sovereignty was not limited to Germany. Italy’s monarchy collapsed. Japan’s emperor was reduced to a symbolic figure under American occupation. Eastern Europe fell behind an iron curtain, where “liberation” became permanent communist vassalage. Western Europe, meanwhile, began the long slide toward what would become the European Union—a structure that removed economic policy from local voters and placed it in the hands of supranational bureaucrats. This transformation was sold as peace. In truth, it was pacification. The spiritual force of nationalism, faith-based identity, and local culture was systematically discredited—often by tying it to fascism or bigotry—while secular technocracy was uplifted as the path to progress. Christian moral language was still used, but it was repurposed to defend institutions that advanced global consolidation: refugee programs, aid conditionality, human rights treaties, all became instruments of influence. The war had succeeded in breaking the old world. But what replaced it was not freedom—it was an international order designed to prevent any challenge to those who finance war, shape postwar reconstruction, and define the acceptable parameters of truth. And at the spiritual level, this marked a critical shift: mankind no longer trusted in the sovereignty of nations under God, but in the promises of man-made peace enforced through debt, diplomacy, and dependency. From the rubble of WWII rose the blueprint for the end-times architecture—a system of nations without power, kings without crowns, and people without true self-determination. It was not a resurrection of justice but the preparation of a throne: one fit not for Christ, but for the counterfeit messiah to come. Part 7: The Holocaust as the Birth Pains of a Nation — Weaponized Sympathy and the Zionist Dream World War II did not end in 1945. It was merely transformed. The battleground shifted from bullets to narrative, from blitzkrieg to diplomacy, from tanks to tears. As millions reeled from the war’s horror, a singular focus began to emerge from the smoke: the Jews must have a homeland, and the world must guarantee it. The Holocaust, an event whose scale and trauma were seared into the global psyche, became the emotional and moral axis around which the birth of Israel was made possible. Zionist leaders, many of whom had long planned for a state in Palestine, seized the moment. They used the catastrophe not only to solicit sympathy, but to apply political pressure—especially on the newly formed United Nations. The Displaced Persons camps of postwar Europe became staging grounds. Survivors, many of whom had no homes or families to return to, were urged—sometimes forced—to immigrate to Palestine. But as several documents in our archive reveal, this migration was not entirely organic. The file titled “How Jewish Leaders Forced Jews to Go to Israel” reveals how Zionist emissaries often used manipulation and even coercion to ensure European Jewry did not resettle in Europe or the Americas but went instead to fulfill the Zionist project. The British, still holding the Mandate over Palestine, were increasingly outmaneuvered. Their efforts to limit Jewish immigration—intended to placate Arab resistance—were drowned out by a rising chorus of Zionist lobbying, American Jewish influence, and international media campaigns highlighting the plight of the Holocaust survivors. In “WW2 Justifies the State of Israel,” the author details how Zionist propagandists swiftly transformed Hitler’s atrocities into a divine license for colonization . European guilt became policy. Sympathy became land. And so, in 1947, the United Nations voted for the partition of Palestine—establishing the legal groundwork for Israel’s declaration of independence the following year. But was this the true purpose of WWII? Was the war, in part, a Zionist design to establish a foothold in the Holy Land by orchestrating catastrophe? Evidence from “The Jewish Betrayal of Germany and the Cause of World War II” suggests a calculated use of Jewish suffering to birth a geopolitical stronghold, not merely a refuge. In spiritual terms, what occurred was a prophetic counterfeit: a new “Israel” forged not in obedience to God, but in the crucible of manipulation, war, and human tragedy. The world was emotionally blackmailed into accepting a political Zion built on the graves of the war-torn, while the true children of Abraham—those of faith—remained scattered. Thus, World War II was not only the war to end fascism—it was the war to create the Zionist State. And the Holocaust, whether fully understood or endlessly debated, was wielded as the moral scepter to silence dissent and crown a nation born of ashes and ambition. Part 8: Stalin, the Soviet Bloc, and the Strange Bedfellows of Zion While the Western powers bore much of the moral and public burden of creating the state of Israel, the crucial decisive support for Israel’s early legal existence came from a most unlikely place: Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union. In a twist that exposes the geopolitical chess of post-WWII realignment, the very regime that symbolized iron-fisted atheism, gulags, and communist revolution became an early midwife to the birth of Zion. According to the document titled “How Stalin Created Israel,” the Soviet Union was among the first nations to recognize the newly declared Israeli state in 1948. But this wasn’t merely symbolic recognition. Stalin’s Eastern Bloc allies, particularly Czechoslovakia, played a pivotal role in supplying arms and military training to Zionist forces—at a time when the British sought to restrain Jewish militarization in Palestine . Why would Stalin support such a nationalist, Western-aligned project? The answer, according to the same document and echoed in “Why Did the USSR Help to Create Israel, But Then Became Its Foe,” lies in Soviet strategy. Stalin hoped that the new Israeli state, built in part by Eastern European Jews with socialist ideals, would align with the communist bloc. He also viewed mass Jewish emigration from the USSR and Poland as a way to rid his regime of what he saw as political liabilities—Jews who might not be fully loyal to Soviet aims or who could become internal dissidents . In this window of history, the interests of Zionism and communism temporarily aligned. The Zionists needed legal and military support; the Soviets needed to shift their Jewish population and undermine British control in the Middle East. Zionist leaders knew that playing both sides—wooing the West while quietly accepting Soviet help—was essential for survival. But the alliance was short-lived. Once it became clear that Israel would not be a socialist satellite, but a pro-Western stronghold aligned with American interests, Stalin turned hostile. Within a few years, the USSR pivoted to supporting Arab states against Israel and launched brutal anti-Zionist purges within its own borders, framing Zionism as a “tool of Western imperialism.” This Soviet betrayal of Zionism was not a moral about-face—it was a strategic correction. Stalin had miscalculated. And so, once again, the Jewish people were used as pawns in a broader war of empires—this time by both capitalist democracies and communist tyrannies. The truth hidden beneath layers of post-war mythology is that the establishment of Israel was not merely a response to the Holocaust or an act of Western guilt—it was also the product of Soviet manipulation, geopolitical gamble, and the Zionist willingness to align with anyone necessary to birth their state. The Zionist project, in its earliest and most fragile years, stood not only on the ashes of European Jewry, but on the silent nod of Joseph Stalin—a man who, paradoxically, helped build the very nation that his successors would spend decades trying to dismantle. Part 9: A Spiritual War Against Christendom World War II was more than just a clash of nations and ideologies—it was a spiritual earthquake that shook the foundations of Christian civilization in the West. Beneath the military campaigns and political realignments was a targeted war on the very heart of Europe’s spiritual identity: Christendom. The aftermath of WW2 saw not merely the defeat of fascist regimes, but the dismantling of the old Christian order that once united Europe in moral, cultural, and religious vision. One of the most overlooked consequences of the war was the intentional decoupling of European identity from Christianity. Before the war, Europe was still largely rooted in national Christian values—Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant. But after the war, as documents like “The Bad War” and “WW2 Justifies the State of Israel” emphasize, a massive reprogramming began. Christianity was subtly rebranded as dangerous when fused with nationalism, associated with the rise of fascism, and thus delegitimized. In its place arose the cult of secularism, international humanism, and moral relativism. The Church no longer stood as a guardian of truth—it was reduced to a relic, blamed in some cases for enabling tyranny. The “denazification” programs went far beyond removing symbols or punishing war criminals—they also erased the spiritual undercurrents of identity that made nations strong, cohesive, and morally grounded. Germany, once a bastion of Lutheran influence, was hollowed out. Italy, under papal influence for centuries, was reoriented toward a globalist, Vatican II framework that distanced the Church from its former militant orthodoxy. Even Britain, which had framed its war effort as a righteous crusade, was left spiritually fatigued and culturally disoriented. A key insight emerges from the research in “The Reasons Historians Call WWII a Jewish Creation” and “The Real Cause of World War II”: the war was used as a divine judgment by some, and as a surgical weapon by others. Zionism was elevated as the new spiritual axis, and Christianity—especially the traditional, nationalist, patriarchal kind—was quietly vilified. This wasn’t accidental. The institutions built in the wake of WW2—the UN, IMF, and EU—were all deliberately stripped of Christian identity and instead rooted in secular, Enlightenment-era globalism. In this light, WW2 functioned as the final act of a centuries-long revolution against Christendom, dating back to the Enlightenment, the French Revolution, and World War I. The Christian remnant was left scattered. The Vatican lost its grip. Protestantism was divided and infiltrated by liberal theology. Orthodox nations were decimated by communism. And the global narrative shifted—from Christ crucified to Holocaust memorials, from the Cross to the Star of David. The suffering of the Jews became the new sacred symbol of the post-war West, replacing the suffering of Christ. And from this new axis, power was redrawn—not around the Church, but around the State of Israel, the United Nations, and the banks and institutions that funded both. In spiritual terms, World War II was a war against the Bride of Christ. And though the Church remains, her power in the world has not been the same since. But the remnant remains. And the war is not over. Part 10: World War II—The Launchpad for Global Control As the guns fell silent in 1945, a new kind of war began—one not fought on battlefields, but in boardrooms, treaties, and global summits. World War II was not the “war to end all wars,” but the engineered prelude to a new world order that enslaved nations through institutions, debt, psychological trauma, and manufactured guilt. The very trauma of the war became the cornerstone upon which a global elite built their empire—politically, economically, and spiritually. The documents in your archive, particularly “The Real Reason for WW2 was Economic” and “The Bad War,” reveal that the destruction of nation-states served as fertile ground for supranational bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and NATO. These institutions were not conceived to preserve peace, but to ensure control. The UN, cloaked in peacekeeping language, established frameworks to override national sovereignty. The IMF and World Bank entangled war-ravaged countries in debt traps that replaced armies with financial servitude. NATO ensured the Western bloc remained militarized under Anglo-American command, not national autonomy. The centerpiece of this post-war structure was the creation of the State of Israel. The Holocaust narrative—rightly evoking the world’s deepest sympathies—was leveraged to sanctify its establishment and criminalize dissent. Any challenge to Zionist objectives or Israel’s foreign policy would be framed as anti-Semitism, allowing a moral shield around one nation, while all others were pushed toward open borders, secularism, and surveillance. This double standard served a purpose: to keep Israel protected as a spiritual and financial hub, while the West was diluted, divided, and dumbed down. Economically, World War II allowed the global central banking network—spearheaded by the Bank for International Settlements—to reshape the monetary order. The war destroyed the gold-backed economic models and ushered in the Bretton Woods system, which linked the world to the U.S. dollar. But even this was temporary. Once the petrodollar system replaced gold entirely, a new form of empire emerged—an empire of fiat debt, enforced by sanctions and wars, and justified by the trauma of a past war that no one was allowed to fully question. Surveillance technologies, now ubiquitous, also find their origins in WWII. Radar, code-breaking, early computing, and intelligence-sharing between Allied nations evolved into a postwar surveillance state. Operation Paperclip brought Nazi scientists into U.S. labs, not just for rocketry, but also psychological warfare, population control, and medical experiments. The very governments that “defeated fascism” now implemented its tools under new names. In spiritual terms, the post-WWII order produced a world that no longer looked to heaven, but to bureaucrats and technocrats for salvation. God was replaced by government, Scripture by charter, and Christ by compliance. Israel, rather than being the culmination of prophetic fulfillment, became the keystone for geopolitical manipulation. And the trauma of WWII became a permanent ritual—a justification for censorship, control, and the silencing of those who dared to ask who truly won the war. World War II did not end in 1945. It simply changed forms. And unless the remnant sees this structure for what it is—a global counterfeit Kingdom rising on the ashes of Christendom—it will continue to rule. But once exposed, the lie collapses. And the Lamb, not the beast, shall have the final word. Conclusion: The War That Rebuilt the World—But Not for Us World War II did not just rearrange borders—it rewrote the architecture of power, faith, memory, and morality. It was not the accidental outcome of nationalism run amok, nor a spontaneous clash between good and evil. Rather, as the collective witness of your archive shows, it was a pre-scripted ritual of destruction—an elite-engineered fire meant to burn away the remnants of Christian sovereignty, economic independence, and moral clarity. In its place, they constructed the pillars of the modern world: Zionist dominance, supranational governance, global finance, and a permanent culture of fear and guilt. This war ended kingships and elevated technocrats. It replaced God-ordained nationhood with centralized bureaucracies. It weaponized compassion for the Jewish suffering into a shield for geopolitical conquest. It buried truth under the rubble of moral outrage, making inquiry itself a crime. It did not liberate man—it branded him, counted him, and made him easier to program. But more than any economic or political change, World War II was a spiritual rupture. It marked the end of Christendom as a dominant force. Christianity, once the moral compass of the West, was deconstructed through shame, disillusionment, and infiltration. It became tame, divided, and worldly—just as intended. The true remnant now stands among ruins, forced to navigate a world rebuilt in opposition to the Kingdom of God. Yet from this ruin, there is revelation. We now see clearly what the war truly was: not a mere conflict of nations, but a chess move in the long war between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. Every sacrifice was scripted, every alliance arranged, every villain and victim chosen to shape the new order. The war itself was a veil—behind it, Zionists, bankers, occult planners, and fallen powers labored to counterfeit the Kingdom, enthrone a false messiah, and control the temple mount of global thought. But we remember what they forgot: the stone not cut by hands. The remnant does not bow to history’s victors. It learns, it discerns, and it endures. As the systems birthed in 1945 begin to crack under their own weight, we prepare—not to restore the world they built, but to witness the one God will. The war is not over. But their illusion is. James Carner

How Blood, Lies, and Empire Were Traded for a Throne in Jerusalem. They told us it began with a bullet in Sarajevo, but the truth was forged long before the gun was fired. The First World War was not a tragic accident of entangled alliances and rising nationalism—it was the ignition of a long-planned design. A war scripted in the shadows of palaces and banks, cloaked in diplomacy, but driven by Zionist ambition and banker control. While young men were sent to slaughter in the trenches of Europe, the architects of this conflict—hidden behind the masks of British imperialism and international finance—were paving the bloodstained road to Jerusalem. The true motive was not revenge for a murdered archduke, but resurrection of a kingdom. Not justice for Austria, but the fulfillment of a geopolitical covenant made between the Rothschild dynasty, the British elite, and the Zionist movement. This was not war for freedom—it was war for land. Not war for democracy—it was war for prophecy. And it was not merely a war of soldiers, but of bankers, brokers, and false shepherds playing god. The Balfour Declaration, dressed as a British promise, was in fact a Rothschild receipt. A deal struck in the smoke-filled rooms of power: support the war, sway the United States, and in return, receive the ancient land of promise—delivered not by divine hand, but by military conquest and imperial decree. They used Scripture as a shield, prophecy as propaganda, and suffering as currency. Millions died, not for honor, but so that a new throne could be erected in the heart of the Middle East—one that would claim to be holy, but serve a kingdom not of heaven, but of man. This scroll will walk through the veiled corridors of that conspiracy, exposing how the Great War was not merely the end of empires, but the beginning of a new one. An empire without borders, ruled not by swords or tanks, but by debt, deception, and the manipulation of divine expectation. This was not the war to end all wars. It was the war that opened the gates to the greatest deception of all. Part 1: The Public Narrative vs. the Hidden Hands The history books claim that World War I was the result of entangled alliances, aggressive nationalism, and militarism—all triggered by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914. Textbooks teach us that this lone act by a Serbian radical sent Europe spiraling into chaos. Austria declared war on Serbia. Russia mobilized. Germany followed. France and Britain were drawn in like dominos, and the rest became a global bloodbath. But beneath that official narrative lies a deeper, more orchestrated reality—one carefully veiled by the victors of history. The political powder keg in Europe had been engineered long before Sarajevo. Financial elites, imperial strategists, and Zionist visionaries saw the coming storm not as a tragedy—but as an opportunity. The so-called “accidental war” was already pre-scripted by secretive imperial networks like the Milner Group in Britain, the Round Table movement, and powerful banking dynasties—chief among them, the House of Rothschild. These actors weren’t merely responding to crisis; they were cultivating it, nudging nations toward the edge, because war was the crucible in which their vision could be forged: a new geopolitical map centered on Palestine. The Rothschilds had long maneuvered behind the scenes of European power, using their interlinked banking houses in London, Paris, Vienna, Naples, and Frankfurt. They financed kings and toppled economies. By the late 19th century, they had already begun quietly purchasing large tracts of land in Ottoman Palestine under the guise of agricultural charity. But to fully claim the land, the Ottoman Empire would have to fall. And for Britain to take control of the Holy Land, the world would have to burn. Meanwhile, Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, had declared in 1897 that a Jewish state would be formed within fifty years. He wasn’t a prophet—he was an operator. That timeline would prove eerily accurate. His movement began courting not only Jewish diaspora communities, but also sympathetic imperialists in London who saw Zionism not just as a Jewish cause, but as a strategic wedge into the Middle East. The script was simple: use the war to destroy the Ottomans, collapse the old European order, and secure British rule over Palestine. Then, with the right letter, signed by the right man, and addressed to the right family, Zionism would receive its crown. The war was not chaos—it was calculation. And the spark in Sarajevo was just the match. The fire was already waiting. Part 2: The Balfour Declaration – A Promise Paid in Blood On November 2, 1917, a single letter was penned that would forever alter the course of history. It began with the words: “Dear Lord Rothschild.” That letter—known today as the Balfour Declaration—was not a symbolic gesture. It was a transaction. A binding political commitment made in the midst of global war, from the British Crown to the Zionist elite, acknowledging support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” But this was not merely an act of goodwill from Lord Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary. It was the culmination of intense lobbying, pressure, and backroom deals between British war strategists and the leaders of the Zionist movement—most notably Chaim Weizmann, who operated as both a chemist and a diplomatic middleman. Weizmann wasn’t working alone. He had the financial backing and global network of the Rothschild banking dynasty behind him, and his political maneuvering placed him at the crossroads of empire and prophecy. Britain, desperate to win the war and ensure American entry, saw Zionism as a tool. The United States, still neutral in early 1917, was deeply divided on intervention. But British officials—particularly in the War Cabinet—believed that a formal promise to the Zionists could sway key Jewish figures in American banking and media to support entry into the war on the side of the Allies. And indeed, just months before the Balfour Declaration was issued, President Woodrow Wilson—surrounded by advisors like Louis Brandeis, a committed Zionist newly appointed to the Supreme Court—began to shift toward war. In April 1917, America entered the conflict. By November, the Balfour letter was sealed. This was not diplomacy—it was leverage. Britain needed American troops and financial backing. The Zionists wanted Palestine. The Rothschilds, who had funded empires and revolutions, finally had a nation on the table—a place where a false throne could one day be established. The declaration did not emerge from public demand, nor parliamentary debate. It came from the top down, written by aristocrats, financiers, and imperialists. Lord Balfour himself had little concern for the Jewish people as a whole; his interest was in empire. He saw the Zionist movement as a way to control the Suez Canal, contain Arab uprisings, and create a loyal foothold in the heart of Islam. Meanwhile, the British public was told they were fighting “to make the world safe for democracy.” In truth, they were dying to make the Middle East safe for Rothschild real estate. The Balfour Declaration was not a divine fulfillment. It was a war contract. And its ink was blood. Part 3: The American Entry – A War Bought with Influence When World War I broke out in 1914, the American people had no appetite for foreign entanglements. President Woodrow Wilson had been elected on the slogan “He kept us out of war.” But behind the scenes, forces were already at work—coordinating, persuading, and manipulating public sentiment to reverse that promise. America, the sleeping giant, would not remain neutral for long. And it wasn’t German aggression that changed her mind—it was Zionist leverage. The Rothschild banking network had no central hub in the United States, but their reach extended through aligned interests—most notably through J.P. Morgan, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and international partners embedded in Wall Street and London. These firms were not merely financial giants; they were war brokers. Morgan alone was appointed by the British government in 1915 as the official purchasing agent for all Allied war supplies. Billions in contracts flowed through American banks before a single U.S. soldier was ever deployed. Meanwhile, the media machine—largely controlled by those same financial circles—began to stir. Stories of German atrocities flooded American newspapers, many of them exaggerated or outright fabricated by British intelligence propaganda units, such as the Wellington House and later the Crewe House under Lord Northcliffe. Public sentiment began to shift, but it was not enough. The final blow came through the covert actions surrounding the Lusitania. Though claimed to be a civilian passenger ship, it was in fact carrying munitions to the British—a fact deliberately hidden from the public. When it was sunk by a German U-boat in 1915, it sparked outrage, but Wilson still hesitated. Only after years of pressure, manipulation, and the promise of post-war control did Wilson finally ask Congress to declare war in April 1917. But why? Why abandon neutrality, knowing the cost? Because the game had changed. The Zionist movement, seeing British need and American indecision, had offered a deal: swing America into the war, and Britain would give them Palestine. The Balfour Declaration was the carrot; American blood would be the stick. Advisors like Louis Brandeis—a Zionist deeply embedded in Wilson’s inner circle—whispered counsel in his ear, while financiers maneuvered the gears of war behind the curtain. The war machine was oiled not with patriotism, but with promises—promises to bankers, to Zionist leaders, to the architects of a new order. And once the war was won, the victors rewrote the maps—not only of Europe, but of the Middle East. The Ottoman Empire would be carved, Jerusalem would be placed in British hands, and the groundwork for the State of Israel would be laid atop the rubble of millions dead. America did not join World War I for freedom. She was baited into a banker’s war to birth a new empire—not her own, but one hiding in the shadow of prophecy. Part 4: The Destruction of Empires to Clear the Way for One World War I was not only a war of armies—it was a war against empires. By its end, four imperial thrones would fall: the German Kaiser, the Russian Tsar, the Austro-Hungarian Habsburgs, and the Ottoman Caliphate. But these collapses were not simply the natural result of battlefield losses. They were strategic demolitions—intentional removals of ancient powers that stood in the way of a new Zionist-centric geopolitical order. Let us begin with the Ottoman Empire, which had ruled over Palestine for centuries. For Zionism to succeed, the Ottomans had to be broken—and they were. The British, through T.E. Lawrence (“Lawrence of Arabia”), incited Arab revolts to fracture Ottoman control. In secret, Britain and France drafted the Sykes-Picot Agreement, carving up the Middle East between themselves even before the war was over. The British would get Palestine, Transjordan, and Iraq—precisely the regions necessary for controlling access to the Holy Land and its prophetic importance. But here’s the critical point: the British did not claim Palestine merely for imperial prestige. They did so because of what they had already promised—to the Rothschilds, to the Zionists, to Weizmann. The fall of the Ottomans was the condition for delivery. Now consider the Russian Empire. Tsar Nicholas II had opposed the Zionist agenda and resisted the encroachment of Jewish revolutionary movements for decades. With the outbreak of war, Russia initially fought as an ally of Britain and France. But in 1917—the same year as the Balfour Declaration—the Bolshevik Revolution erupted. Funded in part by Western financiers, including interests tied to Wall Street and German intelligence, the revolution toppled the Tsar and withdrew Russia from the war. The timing is more than coincidence—it was orchestration. The German Empire and Austro-Hungarian Empire were likewise dismantled at Versailles, fragmented and burdened with reparations. Why? Because they had to be neutralized as future threats to the coming transformation in the Middle East. The Habsburg dynasty, with its Catholic tradition, and the German Kaiser, with his defiance of international banking influence, were not compatible with the Rothschild-Zionist design. The collapse of these empires was not simply the end of an era—it was the clearing of the chessboard. When the dust settled, one power emerged holding Palestine: Great Britain, under obligation to Zionist financiers. The old world had to die so a counterfeit kingdom could be born. Part 5: The Prophecy Weapon – Zionism Cloaked in Scripture To the common Christian, the return of the Jews to the Holy Land seemed like a fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Pastors preached it. Evangelists rejoiced. But few stopped to ask: Whose prophecy was being fulfilled—and whose kingdom was being built? Zionism was not birthed in the fire of faith—it was a political ideology, forged in the salons of European elites and funded by international banking dynasties. Its founders—Theodor Herzl, Chaim Weizmann, and their benefactors in the Rothschild family—were not waiting on God to move; they were buying land, lobbying governments, and using religious prophecy as a tool to mobilize both Jews and Christians alike. The Balfour Declaration, delivered to Lord Walter Rothschild, was steeped in prophetic language. It wasn’t just political—it carried the aroma of divine fulfillment. But this was a carefully engineered aroma, designed to confuse the faithful and mask a colonial transaction in the robes of Messianic hope. Zionism exploited centuries of Christian longing for Christ’s return. It played on eschatological doctrines that claimed the Jews must return to Israel for the end times to unfold. But instead of waiting for the Messiah, they installed a movement that would reject Christ, claim divine right, and build a nation in His name, but not under His authority. By wrapping geopolitical ambition in Scripture, the Zionist movement recruited millions of Christian supporters, particularly in America. This phenomenon—now called Christian Zionism—was born not in Jerusalem, but in British imperial propaganda. Preachers like C.I. Scofield, whose Bible commentary was promoted and funded by Zionist-aligned financiers, rewrote the way Christians interpreted Israel. Suddenly, the modern state of Israel was no longer a political project—it was God’s plan. But here’s the truth the world refused to see: God does not need Rothschild banks to fulfill His Word. He does not build temples through war, or regather exiles through empire. He does not fulfill prophecy through the bloodshed of millions. What emerged in 1948 was not the end of exile, but the beginning of deception. A deception birthed in World War I, fed through World War II, and protected ever since by a global financial and military apparatus that hides behind the Star of David while rejecting the Son of David. The war for Israel was not prophetic—it was premeditated. And the throne they prepared in Jerusalem is not waiting for Christ—it’s being polished for another. Part 6: The Peace That Was a Prison – Versailles, Mandates, and the Hidden Hand When the guns fell silent in 1918, the world rejoiced—but the architects of war were just beginning their true work. The so-called “peace” that followed World War I was not crafted to heal nations—it was drafted to reshape them. The Treaty of Versailles, signed in 1919, was less a reconciliation and more a reconstruction of the world under the influence of Zionist and banking elites. At Versailles, the victors dictated not only the terms of surrender but the blueprints for the next world order. Who sat at the table mattered more than who fought in the trenches. Among them were prominent Zionist agents: Chaim Weizmann, Felix Frankfurter, and Bernard Baruch, all ensuring the realization of the Balfour promise was locked into the post-war system. Britain had secured control of Palestine, thanks to the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire. But it wasn’t merely a colonial acquisition—it was a mandate, a legal mechanism constructed by the League of Nations, under heavy influence from the very powers who had pledged it to the Zionists. The British Mandate for Palestine, formalized in 1920 and again in 1922, codified in international law the delivery of the land to those who had funded the war effort and orchestrated American entry. It is no accident that the League of Nations itself was the brainchild of the same international elite who had backed both the war and the Balfour Declaration. Men like Baruch and Rothschild-aligned advisors sought to craft a world not based on sovereignty, but on managed control—through debt, reconstruction, and supranational organizations. Germany, meanwhile, was crucified at Versailles—intentionally. Burdened with crushing reparations, territorial loss, and moral blame for the war, Germany became a geopolitical scapegoat. Why? Because a broken and humiliated Germany was a prerequisite for the next phase: World War II, which would further justify the Zionist claim to Palestine by invoking Jewish suffering as divine proof. But before that could happen, the infrastructure had to be set: Control of Palestine under British “protection.” Disempowerment of Muslim powers in the region. Demoralization and economic ruin of Germany. Global sympathy for the Jewish people, increasingly framed as stateless victims. This was not peace—it was a prison, disguised as progress. The map had changed, but the masters had not. And while millions mourned the dead, the architects of war were planting seeds for a greater deception. The peace of Versailles was a tombstone for the old world—and a cornerstone for the counterfeit kingdom to come. Part 7: British Israelism – Theology as Imperial Camouflage As bullets and bombs shaped the outer map of the world, doctrine and deception were shaping the inner world of faith. The campaign to establish a Zionist homeland in Palestine could not rely on military conquest and treaties alone—it required a theological infrastructure. The minds and hearts of Christians, especially in Britain and America, had to be conditioned to see the Rothschild-backed state as the fulfillment of God’s promises. Enter British Israelism, a doctrine that claimed the Anglo-Saxon race was the true descendant of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. Promoted throughout the 19th century by elites, writers, and even members of the British aristocracy, this theology subtly linked the British Empire to the biblical covenant, painting imperial conquest as sacred destiny. It told the people: We are not colonizing the world—we are restoring God’s kingdom. It told the Church: We are not interfering with prophecy—we are fulfilling it. British Israelism became the seedbed for Christian Zionism, a movement that would later sweep across American evangelicalism. It taught that the return of the Jews to Palestine was not only expected but divinely mandated. But this was not a grassroots awakening—it was a top-down psychological operation, engineered by imperial strategists who knew that if Christians could be convinced it was God’s will, they would never question the blood spilled to make it happen. This doctrine found its way into pulpits, newspapers, and even policy. It gave theological cover to British control of Palestine and spiritual justification for the displacement of Arabs, many of whom had lived there for centuries. It allowed elites to merge religious prophecy with imperial policy, and it gave the Rothschild-backed Zionist project the appearance of divine inevitability. But what was hidden from the flock was this: The true Israel of Scripture was not a banking project. The kingdom Christ spoke of was not to be built through war, deception, and empire. By marrying British imperialism with biblical language, the enemy created a theological smoke screen—one that still clouds the vision of the Church to this day. Through this lens, millions have been led to support a political state that rejects Christ, persecutes the native Christian remnant in the land, and prepares the throne for one who will deceive the nations. The war was not just for land—it was for the right to define Israel. And by hijacking Scripture, the Rothschild plan dressed conquest in priestly robes. Part 8: The Rothschild Web – Financing the War, Purchasing the Future To understand who truly won World War I, we must follow the money. Not the paper money that burned in Weimar furnaces, nor the reparations paid by a broken Germany—but the golden thread that wove through London, New York, Frankfurt, and Jerusalem. That thread bears a single name: Rothschild. The Rothschild dynasty, already the most powerful banking family in Europe by the 19th century, had spent over a century embedding itself in national treasuries, central banks, and wartime financing. It did not matter which side won—both sides borrowed. But more important than profit was position. The Rothschilds did not need to govern nations; they governed the purse. They understood that wars reshaped the world—but only financiers decided what rose from the rubble. And in World War I, the investment was clear: Ensure Britain wins. Bring America into the war. Break the Ottoman grip on Palestine. Acquire the legal and international mandate for the Jewish homeland. And position the Rothschild dynasty—through land purchases, political leverage, and debt—as the owners and guardians of the new Israel. The Balfour Declaration was not simply a letter—it was a receipt. A down payment on the Rothschild family’s dream to control not only European finance but the Holy Land itself. As early as the 1890s, Baron Edmond de Rothschild had been purchasing land in Palestine. He funded Jewish settlements, agricultural programs, and education systems—all under his name. By the time the British arrived, the Rothschilds already owned large portions of the land—and their name was etched on buildings, institutions, and legal contracts. This was not prophecy fulfilled, but property acquired. Meanwhile, back in London and New York, Rothschild-aligned banks funded Britain’s war effort, while lobbying power in America—through intermediaries like Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, and Bernard Baruch—ensured the U.S. would enter the war in 1917, just as Britain’s strength was fading. That same year—again, not by accident—the Balfour Declaration was issued. The formula was simple: War → Debt → Restructuring → Control. In the ashes of World War I, a new empire emerged—not one of thrones, but of ledgers. A financial kingdom, not anchored in flags or parliaments, but in the vaults of central banks and the signatures on international mandates. The Rothschilds didn’t just win the war—they owned its aftermath. And from their perch, they could now build a state—not for God’s glory, but for global governance under the disguise of ancient promise. Part 9: From One War to the Next – Holocaust, Sympathy, and the Zionist Crown World War I was not the end of a conflict—it was the setup for the next act. Its conclusion left Europe fractured, Germany bitter and economically strangled, and Palestine under British control. But the Zionist blueprint was not yet complete. One more global war was required to break the will of nations, erase resistance, and cement the State of Israel as the ordained outcome of world tragedy. The Treaty of Versailles, crafted by the same financial and Zionist interests that financed the war, ensured Germany’s future implosion. Crippling reparations, hyperinflation, and national humiliation created a perfect environment for extremism. But more than that, it created a narrative—one that would eventually lead to Hitler’s rise, the targeting of European Jews, and the sacred mythology of the Holocaust. Let it be made clear: the suffering of the Jewish people in Europe was real and horrific. But what followed was a weaponization of tragedy, a political apparatus that converted the blood of the innocent into land deeds, global immunity, and eternal moral leverage. It was not Jewish survival that the architects of Zionism desired—it was Jewish consolidation. The Rothschild-backed Zionist leadership, with figures like Chaim Weizmann and David Ben-Gurion, prioritized the creation of Israel over the rescue of European Jews. Historical records and testimonies confirm that when faced with opportunities to evacuate or protect Jews outside of Palestine, these leaders often resisted unless the route led directly to Zion. They needed martyrs, not refugees. They needed the world to cry, so the Balfour promise could be fulfilled without question. They needed Hitler to become Pharaoh—so that Rothschild could play Moses. The Second World War, then, was not merely revenge or ideology—it was the final blow to remove the last obstacles to the Zionist project. The fall of Germany, the dismemberment of Europe, the collapse of the British Empire, and the horror of the Holocaust created a perfect moral storm. The world now demanded a homeland for the Jews—and those who orchestrated the demand were ready with the solution. In 1948, the State of Israel was born—not in the spirit of repentance or restoration, but in the spirit of conquest, deception, and blood. It was not Jacob who returned to the land, but Edom disguised as Jacob. The name was the same—but the spirit was not. Thus, the war that began in 1914 as a banker’s conflict ended in 1948 with a Rothschild-backed throne planted in Jerusalem. A state forged not by God’s hand, but by men who believed they could replace God, manipulate prophecy, and enthrone their own messiah. The plan was never about just a nation. It was always about a stage—for a coming king who would deceive the world. Part 10: The Final Theater – Jerusalem as the Throne of the False Messiah What began with Rothschild gold and Balfour ink has become the centerpiece of global prophecy. The war to create Israel was never about Jewish safety—it was about establishing a counterfeit holy ground. One that could host not the return of Christ, but the rise of the Antichrist. The Zionist state—constructed through war, diplomacy, and blood sacrifice—now stands at the heart of the world’s most volatile conflicts. Nations rise and fall by how they treat it. Evangelical churches worship it. Presidents vow to defend it. And yet, this modern state rejects the Son of God, persecutes Christians within its borders, and partners with the very same global banks and intelligence agencies that orchestrated the collapse of Christian nations in the West. Israel, as it stands, has become the geopolitical altar of a false covenant. It is there, in Jerusalem, that the final deception will unfold. The Zionist elite—having used two world wars to seize the land—now await their “anointed one”, the messianic figure that Jesus warned about: “I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not; if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.” (John 5:43) This is the throne the First World War was truly fought to prepare. Not the throne of David—but a throne usurped, waiting to be occupied by a global ruler who will unite finance, religion, and war under a single crown. The Zionist movement was never just about land—it was about power, prophecy, and replacement. Replacement of the Temple. Replacement of the Church. Replacement of Christ. And so the blood spilled in the trenches of Europe, the firebombed cities, the six million dead, the treaties signed in darkened halls—all of it becomes the prelude to the great deception. But the true remnant sees. We see that the promise to Abraham was fulfilled in Christ—not in Rothschild. We see that the kingdom of God is within us—not in UN mandates or barbed-wire borders. And we see that the same hand which started the Great War is preparing the next—World War III, the clash of civilizations, designed once again to raise a false deliverer in the name of peace. But he shall be revealed. And those with oil in their lamps will not be deceived. The first war was never just about empire. It was always about a throne. Conclusion: The Throne That Was Not God’s World War I was not the beginning of modernity—it was the beginning of the end. The end of truth in politics, the end of sovereignty in nations, the end of innocence in warfare. And most of all, it marked the beginning of a global architecture built to counterfeit God’s plan with precision and patience. The official histories will continue to echo the lie: that the war began over alliances, pride, or a single assassination. But those who look with spiritual eyes see something far deeper—a ritual sacrifice of empires, conducted by bankers and crowned by Zionist ambition. From the Balfour Declaration to the League of Nations, from the Rothschild land deeds in Palestine to the falling dominos of monarchy across Europe, the blueprint for Israel was drafted not in heaven, but in hell’s boardroom. They used prophecy as cover, the Jewish people as pawns, and Christianity as a tool to build their throne. But that throne will not stand. For God is not mocked. And what man builds in blood, fire, and lies will not survive the breath of the King who is coming. The true Israel is not a plot of land—it is a people born again in Spirit and truth. It is those who have received the Messiah, not rejected Him. The throne of David will not be inherited by bankers or politicians or secret societies, but by the One whose robe is dipped in blood and whose name is the Word of God. The remnant must not be deceived by the smoke of war or the golden glitter of Jerusalem’s stones. We must discern the difference between the Zion of God and the Zion of man, between the Lamb and the beast who tries to sit in His place. Let the world worship the counterfeit. Let the nations march again toward a third war. But let the elect remember: the first war was not for peace—it was for a throne. And that throne, was never theirs to take. James Carner

Oct 9th 2023 Keir Starmer will today promise to get Britain its future back, saying that his five missions will usher in a decade of national renewal “totally focused on the interests of working people.” The Labour leader will draw a contrast between his plan and the last 13 years of Tory rule, saying that with his leadership Labour will “turn our backs on never-ending Tory decline with a decade of national renewal” and give the British people the “government they deserve.” https://labour.org.uk/updates/press-releases/keir-starmer-promises-to-kick-of-decade-of-national-renewal-as-he-sets-out-plan-to-get-britains-future-back/ … i hadn’t really heard of it either but I notice how intimidating and threatening it sounds, then you read it and it sort of makes out that it’s aimed at Farage. We are the enemy?! That Starmer is an absolute prick

Maybe, and that is quite some ordeal. But it still doesnt get away from the fact that I cant believe she didnt know what Watkins was up to, enough to blow the whistle, which could have prevented a lot of his further heinous activities against children from happening. If so, she was perverting the course of justice. And you say not in the sicko gang, but she is BBC royalty, related to Bill Cotton, a major player at the BBC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Cotton BBC head of light entertainment (1970–1977) Controller of BBC1 (1977–1981) In 1970, Cotton was promoted to head of light entertainment.... In this position, Cotton was responsible for overseeing the production of a whole series of popular variety and light entertainment shows, including Jim'll Fix It Mental health charities and books (and cancer) seem to be a good cover for some of the worst offenders in these offences. See the royals.

Then consider me an enemy! TBH, although there is an increase of non white people in my town the main issue is that half the population of it now seems to be smackheads. Another nail is the community spirit coffin.

'If you say they should now be deported, then mark my words, we will fight you with everything we have, because you are the enemy of National Renewal' Keir Starmer. https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ENRprgdUp/

This youtuber has been analysing google search trends and he's found that a lot of people who were acting suspicious on the day of the shooting were searched for in July or August from Israeli IP's. Later in the video he talks about a livestream of the event, which he believes was used to monitor the rooftops to let the shooter know there was no security or law enforcement up there at the time. The lad who was filmed jumping from the top of the building was another spotter, while the shot was fired from a different rooftop lower down. (14:20) Caldera engineering searches (44:12) Life is Driving livestream (1:03:13) Rooftops relevant to the shooting (1:14:36) Layout of campus (1:20:42) Flash behind tree (1:50:50) Searches for Pony tail boy, lanyard flip

my introduction: I’m from Austria, 75 years old and in good health conditions. My background is high tech, studied physics at the University in Graz, Austria, and worked always in Semiconductor industrie, before retirement in Silicon Valley as CEO of a Stanford spin off. I came across David when I did my research on Covid , 9/11, Iraq wars….. and found the best explanation in Davids contributions. I’m very much interested in discussion on phenomena like the findings of the spanish group, la quinta columna, e.g. they show vaccinated persons emit bluetooth signals, whats not mentioned in the scene very often, but easily justified. And I want to share thoughts what to do in this situation to help m@nkind to overcome the threads. thank you

The new order will be lead by Russia and China, Putin and Xi even call it their "NWO" and most younger people (ie under 40 or so) in the West support Russia and China, in large part because of all the Youtube and Twitter videos of how "advanced and cool" Russia and China are, and how "based" Putin and Xi are. Once Reform wins the GE and Farage becomes PM, we will have a government that is friendly to Russia in the same way Trump's America is. All by design.