Leaderboard

Thanks Eve, for taking the time to actually read through the articles I linked to and giving us some insight! I was of course not singling anyone out or pointing any finger of blame. This is an issue that has been going on for years, where it seems many people who have been in receipt of benefits, or 'universal credit' as it is now known, have found themselves in a position where they are actually better off not working. But it opens up a whole slew of other questions, as to why we have so many unemployed people in our country, yet are importing labour from other countries in order to fill employment gaps? The obvious answer is that "the immigrants will work for less money", which certainly has been the case for many years. But it is clear that in order to tackle the 'black-hole' in the country's finances, Labour are going to make themselves unpopular, by having to make cuts to benefits payouts. It is my opinion that the media are using stories like these to 'whip up support' and socially-engineer public opinion. Another classic 'divide-and-rule' tactic. The welfare bill for this country is undoubtedly 'unsustainable', to coin a phrase. But there seems to be little attempt by the government to try and address this, and understand the reasons why so many people have fell into this 'safety net' of welfare support, and become so dependent on it. On the surface, there has been a failing for many years with the education system in this country. Labour/skills shortages that have had to be addressed by importing immigrants, in order to fulfil those roles. But then again on the other hand, too many people have had this mentality beaten into them that they will always be stuck at the 'bottom of the career ladder'. I do disagree - when I left sixth-form college, my first job was a very low-paid retail job, but I loved it and I stuck at it. I learned as I went, and by working hard and gaining experience, I was able to progress 'up the ladder'. It took a good few years, as well as numerous changes of job, to get where I am now. We all have to start somewhere though! I just wonder if there are so many people who feel they are 'stuck' on social security handouts, because it is enough for them to get by on, and they don't want to face such realities as responsibility and ambition.

The only saving grace concerning Ai is the complete insufficiency of the grid to power it as they would want to. Even if they cut power to the proles, it still wouldn't leave anywhere near the required capacity. I saw the figures recently - somewhere on Instagram - but can't presently remember exactly where. I'll look for it over the days ahead but it was an encouraging read.

Global Experts DEMAND a Worldwide STOP to the Use of mRNA "At their worst, the COVID shots may have produced an amount of damage to human life that is worse than any other manmade disaster in history, including the Great Leap Forward and all wars." WITH VIDEO https://www.thekingstonreport.com/p/global-experts-demand-a-worldwide?utm_source=podcast-email&publication_id=1103773&post_id=175964590&utm_campaign=email-play-on-substack&utm_content=watch_now_button&r=1gfqdw&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

KHADIJA KHAN: Despite what Sadiq Khan claims, we ARE creeping towards Islamic law I wish I could say I was surprised by this shocking and shameful event. But, sadly, I'm not. I see the exclusion of women from a Muslim charity fun run in Victoria Park, Tower Hamlets, as the inevitable consequence of our obsession with multiculturalism. This ruinous creed has quietly normalised the oppression of women when it occurs under the banner of Islam. Last month, President Trump warned that the UK was sliding towards a culture of sharia law – a claim dismissed as 'appalling and bigoted' by a spokesman for London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan. And, of course, in this country we don't officially have sharia law but we are creeping towards a society that is compliant with its values. Yes, misogyny exists everywhere. But we're usually quick to call it out, whether it's a sexist advert on the London Underground or discrimination in the workplace. Only when it's Islamic misogyny do we fall silent, excusing it as a cultural issue. Ask yourself: how long would a Jewish or Christian run excluding women go ahead without sparking national outrage? That this event is taking place in Hackney – heartland of London's progressive hipster set – only adds insult to injury. The coconut cappuccino brigade would be first in line to boast of their feminist credentials, just not when Muslim women are being excluded by their own community. This isn't just hypocrisy, but a betrayal. A betrayal of these women who are denied the basic freedoms most others take for granted. It's infantilising, too – the unspoken suggestion that Muslim communities are somehow incapable of adapting to the secular, democratic values of wider society. The liberal Left may not want to hear it, but there is a straight line between a seemingly innocent charity run and the horrors of so-called honour killings, or even the grooming gangs scandal. These are not isolated incidents. They stem from the same toxic ideology, that women are inherently 'less'. So yes, I'm outraged. But I'm also profoundly saddened – because behind the headlines are thousands of women and girls still denied the freedom to run, swim, cycle or enjoy the simplest pleasures of life. I know, because I was one of them. Growing up in a strict Muslim household in Pakistan, I remember the joy of riding my bike in the street. But when I complained to my father that a group of boys had jeered at me for being so permissive, he told me in no uncertain terms that I was the problem and banned me from cycling ever again. I was eight years old. It would take another two decades – and a move to Germany in my late 20s, leaving behind both my family and my religion – before I rode a bike again. I cried when I did. Because to me, that freedom symbolised everything I had finally regained and everything I'd lost. So make no mistake, while young girls may be on that 'family' run today, the fact their mothers are not participating tells us exactly what fate awaits them. Once they reach puberty, they'll be expected to hang up their running shoes for good. How can we, as a democratic society in the West, tolerate this? If Sadiq Khan had any backbone, he'd issue a statement making it clear: people are free to follow whatever values they choose, but when those values conflict with the core principles of the society we all live in, they must be condemned without fear or favour.

In recent weeks, while trawling through the BirminghamLive website in a desperate attempt to find some actual local news, I have noticed an increasing trend for articles about people on Universal Credit, basically boasting about getting 'money for nothing'. https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/im-universal-credit-refuse-visit-32652577 https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/im-dwp-benefits-mumfluencer-31000-32652309 https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/im-self-confessed-dwp-benefits-32644976 https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/im-pregnant-mum-three-dwp-32648304 https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/im-single-mum-1700-universal-32653719 The above 5 screenshots are from what is currently presented on the BirminghamLive home page, so it's not like I've been actively looking for these! (I'm pretty sure the same, or at least similar, stories are also plastered across all the other Reach Plc news websites across the UK) So what gives, and what is this all about? Unsurprisingly, there are no comments allowed on any of these articles, because no doubt they would be filled up with all sorts of angry and 'hateful' comments, as well as the usual "fair play to them" etc. On the one hand, it appears on the surface to be some very blatant 'promotion' or even advertising of Universal Credit, by promoting how much people can 'earn' simply by not going to work and earning a proper wage. On the other hand, it also serves as a 'kick in the teeth' for those good honest folk - such as myself - who do go to work and earn a living, which pays for rent/mortgage, council tax, household/energy bills, and puts food on the table. As well as being obvious 'click-bait' to generate advertising revenue, it's also 'rage-bait', designed for people to share on social media - as they can't comment on the articles themselves - which then stirs up a whole load of other arguments. One thing I do find curious though, is that all these 'universal credit scroungers' mostly appear to be 'white people'. Of course, in these latest examples, it's all 'white women' but I have also seen similar articles featuring 'white men' as well. Strangely, you don't see any such articles about Asian/Pakistani men boasting about how much they 'earn' from Universal Credit, while having a nice sideline in dealing drugs, operating protection rackets, or stealing cars to strip them for parts. Admittedly, I've not read any of the articles I have linked to above, so I don't know what they're about. The purpose of this post is just so that I can point out yet another example of how the mainstream media are using social engineering to manipulate the public's perception of reality. Actually now I think about this, maybe this is also some 'predictive programming' in order to drum up support for when the current Government wants to try and reduce the benefits/welfare bill due to the black hole in their finances. "Of course these lazy dole-dossers should get less money!!!"

Back then this was comedy And how the world is today

Yes indeed - according to Starmer, "Westminster is too constrained" and "just a tribal shouting place". He prefers to work with the Davos elite rather than for the British people.

Cunning plan??? are you Baldrick???

One of the methods they use to subtly promote ID cards in the UK and US is using Youtubers to post videos about how amazing and futuristic all the payment apps and facial recognition tech is in China, like Alipay and WeChat. They portray it as trendy and exciting, like something out of a sci-fi movie. They also know that many Westerners are less likely to resist if they see it as coming from China as opposed to their own elite, China is seen by many as more benign and less threatening.

Disgraced convicted fraudster Tower Hamlets mayor defends mosque decision to ban women and girls over the age of 12 from taking part in charity fun-run The mayor of Tower Hamlets has defended a mosque's decision to ban women from a charity run - as an investigation began into potential breaches of equality laws. East London Mosque barred any females over 12 from taking part in yesterday's 5km event, which was billed as 'inclusive' and 'family friendly' despite the gender bar. The prizes were presented by Lutfur Rahman, who was kicked out as leader of Tower Hamlets Council for electoral fraud in 2015 before being re-elected in 2022. Taking to Facebook last night, he hailed the event as 'truly inspiring'. 'It was a pleasure to attend the prize-giving ceremony at the 12th Muslim Charity Run in Victoria Park, London, organised by the East London Mosque,' he wrote. 'Over 1,600 runners of all ages and abilities participated, raising funds for 40 different charities - a truly inspiring community effort!' The post quickly attracted criticism in light of the 'sexist' participation rules. Asked at the event what he thought about women being excluded, the disgraced politician - who leads his own party, Aspire - was defiant. Snip The Equality and Human Rights Commission has now vowed to assess the case. A spokeswoman said last night: 'We consider each [complaint] carefully and take action where appropriate.' The fundraiser was held in Victoria Park in Tower Hamlets. Bordering on trendy Hackney, the area is often frequented by the capital's hipsters and artists. But the move comes amid growing concerns about the rise of 'sharia values' taking precedence over British laws and traditions. Outraged campaigners said banning some women was 'plainly unlawful' and 'regressively sexist' – and accused the organisers of being more 'conservative' than Saudi Arabia. The Women's Policy Centre said: 'This is appalling. The exclusion of women and girls from a charity fun run is further evidence of why we must be talking about #TheShariaQuestion.' Baroness Shaista Gohir OBE, the chief executive of the Muslim Women's Network UK, said the East London Mosque, which is behind the event, was 'likely' in breach of the Equality Act. And Kellie-Jay Keen, founder of feminist group Party Of Women, said: 'Banning women and girls over the age of 12 from a public charity event is plainly unlawful… and reinforces regressive sexist attitudes towards women's place in public life. 'No charity should be allowed to operate under a different set of rules because of religion or culture. Equality before the law must apply to everyone.' The annual event, originally named Run 4 Your Mosque, has been held in Victoria Park since 2012 without drawing any public criticism of its anti-women policy. But the MoS is aware of one woman, who goes by the name 'Farahyd89' on social media, who has repeatedly attempted to raise the issue with organisers. She wrote on Instagram: 'Why aren't women allowed to join?' and in another post she said: 'Why are you not allowing women to even walk? Your grandmothers and mothers with prams also not welcome?' On its website, the event claims to be an 'inclusive' family day out that allows 'men, boys of all ages and girls under 12' to take part. When pressed by the MoS if that meant teens and older women could not run, the East London Mosque organisers confirmed that they are banned. Despite that, mosque leaders insisted that their policy was not in contravention of the Equality Act, which makes it illegal to discriminate against someone on the grounds of their sex. However, they failed to explain why some girls could take part in the event – those under 12 years old – and not others. The revelations will compound fears that there is a growing tide of sharia values in Britain – a concern raised by President Donald Trump at the UN last month. The US President said London wants 'to go to sharia law' under its 'terrible' mayor, Sir Sadiq Khan. Mr Khan – who responded to Mr Trump by calling him 'Islamophobic' and 'racist' – last night did not respond to a request to comment on whether Muslim Charity Run's rules were acceptable. Sharia values vary across the globe. However, concerns have been raised about more hardline attitudes towards women and girls that have seen them limited in their access to education and sports. Yesterday, Ms Keen said: 'The East London Mosque Trust reports annual revenues exceeding £5million, including £10,000 from the Government, and claims to spend much of this on education, training, social welfare and community cohesion. 'It raises serious questions about how much of their charitable activity may also breach the Equality Act. 'It is clear that this organisation does not understand, or chooses to ignore, its legal responsibilities to women and girls.' Last night, an East London Mosque spokesman said: 'The suggestion that our event breaches the Equality Act is entirely incorrect. 'Single-gender sporting events are lawful under Section 195 and Schedule 23 of the Act, and are common across the UK, including the Women's Run Series, Nike Women's 10K, and gender-segregated swimming sessions at Orthodox Jewish facilities like Manchester Jewish Community Centre. 'The Muslim Charity Run operates under the same legal framework as these established events.' The Daily Mail, when contacting the mosque on Sunday afternoon, was told there was 'nobody here to comment'. Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15186775/Disgraced-convicted-fraudster-Tower-Hamlets-mayor-defends-mosque-decision-ban-women-girls-age-12-taking-charity-fun-run.html

Swedish deputy PM says the country must ban the burqa 'while we can' and condemns 'failed integration' The deputy prime minister of Sweden has called for a burqa ban 'while we can' as she hit out at the country's 'failed integration'. Ebba Busch, leader of the Christian Democrats, said the Scandinavian country should prohibit woman from wearing burqas and niqabs in public, claiming it is an 'oppression' that is not welcome. Snip Ms Busch, who also serves as the country's Minister for Energy and Minister for Business and Industry, said she believes the veils are incompatible with Swedish society and are an 'expression of a strict interpretation of Islam practiced in totalitarian states such as Iran and Afghanistan'. Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15186915/Swedish-deputy-PM-says-country-ban-burqa-condemns-failed-integration.html

A calf or bull is likely a symbol of the Canaanite God Baal, and to me it shows an instinctive appeal of Pagan religion which re-emerged when their leader Moses was absent, as he was apparently promoting monotheism. So there's a power struggle going on between the Gods and, behind the scenes, between the priesthood and the people as to which is the top God. And taking it further, monotheists want Jehovah to be the only God and demote the others to a lesser status. Most religions of the time had a hierarchy in the heavens, with a chief God and subservient Gods and Goddesses who sometimes fight among themselves; then this gets reflected in religions here on Earth. This was around the time of the bronze age collapse with a lot of disruption and changes going on.

I'll never understand why Western white nationalists support Russia. Literally all Putin supporters ever go on about is "Kill Naaaaazis. Must kill Naaaaaazis". Western white nationalists would be the first to be lined up against a wall and shot in Russia and China's NWO. They are digging their own graves.

After you Maz, no really you can go first, and it’s age before beauty ;)

How about if it wasn't God who wrote the OT, but priests of a bronze/iron age people who fought and maybe genocided other tribes to take their land, and have an authoritarian social policy to increase their own population. Brutal, but it's a survival strategy. And how many other tribes and empires did the same kind of thing?

This is one of those things that "sounds good in theory"... How will the EU's new border system work? from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39rkpe8mj2o "Strengthen security and ultimately make travel smoother" Which is all very well and good if you're travelling "legally" I suppose. But it doesn't seem to do anything about "illegal immigration"? All the places where people 'legally' enter the EU then. Well, I guess a lot of people might be inconvenienced by having to queue for a bit longer than normal! My concern is that this doesn't appear to address the issue of those who enter the EU 'illegally' and then take advantage of the Schengen Area to freely move through Europe in their attempt to smuggle themselves across the Channel and into the UK! It's quite amazing really, to be able to 'legally' travel to/from the EU, lets say to go on holiday or for a business meeting, then you have to pay for that privilege As well as go through all the fuss of having your fingerprints scanned etc. Of course, this doesn't affect illegal immigrants at all I suppose, and they'll continue to be waved through with no questions asked!

kissy,kissy that wall!!!

These are the people, with Israel-owned Trump, that ‘negotiated’ the ‘peace deal’. Given that ultra-Zionist Kushner is a life-long friend of Netanyahu and ultra-Zionist Witkoff is an Israel fanatic do you think the ‘deal’ is to benefit Israel or the Palestinians?

Iv already come up with a cunning plan. When I go to get my vaccination I will identify as a 75 year old.

Mental. Parents rushing off to get their kids jabbed. Standing in a queue to get a flu jab. Then rush to McDonald’s for lunch because they have a fat jab pencilled in for the afternoon. What’s brilliant is how when these folk do get sick they lay in bed for months coming out with drivel like “ooh imagine how worse I would have been if I didn’t get the jab!” Although, tbh, when I get sick I do go around telling people how bad It could have been if I had been jabbed….

UBI will eventually be a bare minimum to survive allowance. No treats. No holidays. I think they might do something, again on the notion you have the app, where they look at your situation and say, “right, single parent, three kids…. AI suggests you need £100 a week on food shopping to log in to your LidlPlus (or whichever store you have chosen) and find £100 in food and drink vouchers and coupons.” The government and shops could make a deal regarding VAT so everyone is a winner but the single parent would have to buy what they have been told is necessary. If they are found to have spent it on alcohol and prioritised that over food then social services will take their kids away and their weekly allowance will be slashed! On the other hand…. I do get why being on benefits is appealing. If you have child care it can cost most of your wages to put your kids into nursery or with a childminder. And even if you can get your kids into nursery between 9-3, you would need a childminder for the pick up times and even then you would need to find a job that’s between 9-3 and close enough to the nursery to get kids yourself. Of course the cynic in me thinks the governments are purposely getting further into debt so that when they come up with their saviour plan (UBI and digital ID) people will be so desperate they will probably beg for it.

Yeah and I think this is how it’ll creep in. For most people, most of the time, things probably don’t seem that different. I thought the other day about shopping and the amount of apps people have. Tesco. LidlPlus. Co op etc… And how at the minute you can still shop without one.. But, imagine another lockdown scenario where shops are closed. You can order online but only with an app. They may even allow a few shoppers daily but only those with that shops app etc… I had a letter in the post the other day from my GP suggesting I download an app to make booking appointments easier and to have queries responded to quicker…. As they know people are fed up with hour long waits on the phone just to be told that the next available appointment is months away. And slightly unrelated, but now, every time I go online to query something like broadband, or even a google search, my results are provided by AI. It’s not even creeping in anymore. Apps and AI are already herding us into a pen.

I've long said what is happening to Gaza will happen to us in the future, and the journalist made a valid point that ties all this in. He mentions about how badly the Palestinians are being treated by Israelis (the immigrants) in a degrading way despite being the indigenous people. They are now minorities in their own homeland (words to that effect). We too shall suffer this in time with many immigrants (illegal and legal) turning on us, and of course this has been engineered by tye ZJs. Gaza is a training exercise for the Wests take over by them. Gray State wasn't allowed to be made because it was too close to the truth.

Jesse Beltran scanning Alex jones on infowars

Digital ID cards could be rolled out to access your 'OWN MONEY' says Keir Starmer in extraordinary admission Keir Starmer admitted that digital ID could be rolled out to access your "own money" as he responded to a question from GB News Political Correspondent Katherine Forster. Speaking during a press conference in India, Sir Keir highlighted the benefits of the system, citing the example of Estonia, where digital ID has been widely adopted. “I want to be very clear,” he said. “Digital ID has been transformational in other countries. It allows people to access their own money and make payments far more easily than currently possible.” Sir Keir defended plans for tighter digital ID measures to stop people “working illegally” in the UK. “We have to do something about that,” he said. “We can’t shirk it. The vast majority of people want it gripped.” He added: "We need to make the case for these benefits clearly. There should be a national debate about it. And I think the more people understand the advantages, the more they will see how it can make their lives easier and as has happened in other countries, they will want to adopt it." Katherine also grilled the Prime Minister on his popularity, asking him if he has the "reverse Midas touch" with the British people. GB News

I didn't see a general digital ID thread so we can track this project? Global Digital Identity Project Introduction The global digital identity (digital ID) project represents a concerted international effort to create secure, verifiable digital identities for billions of people, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It forms a core pillar of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), integrating identity verification with payments and data-sharing systems to enhance access to services like healthcare, education, and finance. Launched amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the initiative emphasizes privacy-protecting technologies such as blockchain to empower individuals while addressing the estimated 1 billion people without formal ID. As of 2025, adoption is accelerating, driven by public-private partnerships. Key Creators and Organizations The project traces its roots to the ID2020 Alliance, founded in 2016 as a public-private partnership to provide digital IDs to refugees and underserved populations. Founding members include Accenture, Microsoft, Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance), the Rockefeller Foundation, and IDEO.org. The alliance has since expanded to over 100 partners, including NGOs like the Acumen Fund, tech firms like Blockstack and Mastercard, and financial giants like BlackRock and Bloomberg Philanthropies. The United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) have amplified these efforts. In 2023, the UN launched the "50-in-5" campaign to roll out DPI—including digital IDs—in 50 countries by 2028. The UN Digital ID, introduced in 2024, is supported by founding organizations such as the UN Secretariat, UNDP, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNJSPF, and WFP. ID2020's mission focuses on ethical, privacy-centric digital IDs as foundational DPI, with projects like the Good Health Pass Collaborative (launched 2021) involving 125+ entities from tech, health, and travel sectors. Financing Funding blends philanthropic, corporate, and multilateral sources. Microsoft pledged $1 million plus resources in 2018, while Accenture contributed technology for blockchain prototypes. The Rockefeller Foundation and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provide significant backing, reportedly channeling billions into the UN's 50-in-5 initiative alongside partners like BlackRock. ID2020 coordinates these funds toward high-impact projects, though exact totals are not publicly detailed. Broader support comes from investors like Ribbit Capital (via ID.me's $340M raise in 2025) and multilateral bodies like the World Bank, which aids 60+ countries through its ID4D program. Extent of Implementation As of 2025, digital ID adoption has surged globally. Governments issued approximately 5 billion digital IDs by 2024, with projections for continued growth; the market is valued at $47 billion and expected to quadruple by the mid-2030s. Trinsic tracks over 280 digital ID networks worldwide, spanning national systems like India's Aadhaar (1.3+ billion users) and emerging ones in Africa and Asia. The World Bank's ID4D has supported 80+ countries in strengthening ID systems, while the EU and Japan lead in advanced verifiable credentials for secure benefits. Implementation varies: High-income nations focus on privacy-enhanced wallets, while LMICs prioritize inclusion. Recent rollouts include the UK's government site upgrades (framed as IT security enhancements, bypassing parliamentary debate) and global pilots for biometric-linked finance. Challenges persist in data privacy and equity, with 2025 predictions highlighting diverse proofs like fingerprints and facial recognition. Region Key Implementations Coverage Estimate North America US Login.gov, Canada Digital ID 70% adult population Europe EU eIDAS 2.0, UK GOV.UK One Login 85%+ in leading nations Asia-Pacific India Aadhaar, Philippines PhilSys 1.5B+ users combined Africa/LMICs Ethiopia Fayda, UN 50-in-5 pilots 40% growth since 2023 Global Total 280+ networks ~5B IDs issued by 2024 WEF Links and Broader Ecosystem The WEF plays a pivotal role in advocacy and coordination. Its Connected Future Initiative (launched 2025) advances next-gen DPI, including digital IDs, to connect underserved populations. The EDISON Alliance (2021) targets digital inclusion for 1 billion people by 2025 in health, education, and finance. WEF emphasizes "security by design," as seen in India's DPI model, and promotes universal wallets for tokenized identities. Partnerships with the World Bank and UN underscore WEF's influence, positioning digital ID as essential for equitable transformation. Recent discourse highlights concerns over surveillance risks in rollouts tied to WEF policies. Conclusion The global digital ID project, spearheaded by ID2020 and propelled by UN/WEF frameworks, is on track to redefine access and trust in the digital age. While financing from Gates, Rockefeller, and tech leaders enables rapid scaling, ethical implementation remains critical to mitigate privacy risks. By 2028, DPI could cover half the world, but success hinges on inclusive governance. For deeper dives, explore ID2020.org or weforum.org/agenda/digital-identity.

I remember watching a messianic teacher who showed that even this calculation was wrong by about 120 years, and the Js knew it but kept to the inaccurate date anyways. There is a 6000 year "timeline" whereas from time of Adam&Eve til Yeshua's crucifixion til today is 6000 til the endtimes. Basically we are at that point now hence all the rapture dates relentlessly flooding us lol. Gnostics believe that there was mankind before Adam and Eve, but they weren't as advanced, something to do with only lower half of chakras functional so full spiritual enlightenment was not impossible, but less likely. It's where we get the organic portal phenomenon from. After all, when Adam and Eve fell from the garden (dropped a few dimensions into this 3D and lost their light bodies) there were people around them when they did, so this even at basic level predates the 6000 year creation. I believe it wasn't the sin in the context it was portrayed, but an awakening of consciousness to know good and evil, to develop coherence over being incoherent in the face of evil. Adam and Eve were blissfully ignorant until that point, fully under YHVH-Lucifers spell. Gnosticism suggests the serpent was Sophia-Wisdom, to ignite the spark of God within us, and the process of us coming back into who we truly are which of course YHVH-Lucifer had a shit fit and cursed them out. Iesus says not to curse but bless those who curse you, so this again validates YHVH not being the true creator the world has been deceived to believe. No wonder the gnostics were burned alive and today we see a big hebrew roots movement being pushed. Christians have already been sold this from the Schofield bible to bless the state of Israel and the Js. These events may seem not to be related, but if we are at that 6000year timeline, then they will do anything and everything to get people in line under their narrative.

She frames it as a tool "for people who are here and working legally." The immediate, unstated flip side of that coin is the creation of a two-tier society. Your ability to work, access healthcare, or benefits becomes contingent on state-approved digital permission. This isn't just about convenience; it's about control. She explicitly ties it to "dealing with illegal working" and "illegal migration." The digital ID becomes the ultimate gatekeeper. No ID? No access. No rights. They call it a "key" for you, but it's really a lock for them. It’s a system that will inevitably be mission-crept from checking immigration status to monitoring your access to everything, creating a perfect architecture for social credit and surveillance. Other countries have tried this. We must look at what they’ve done: the security risks of a single point of failure, the inevitable data breaches, and the erosion of privacy and anonymous existence. This is the beginning of a digital prison, and they're trying to sell it to you as a key.

We really need Richard D Hall to look into the disappearance of Nicola Bulley, do a full investigation and give his view on what went on. But I don't see him doing anything about the case anytime soon, which is a pity. The only thing Hall mentioned about the case, is that he suspects it was a psyop, something to do with censorship of online, independent investigators, but he never mentioned anything to do with what may've happened to her, if she even died or was even a real person (I know that sounds ridiculous). Peter Hyatt the statement analyst looked at Paul's interview and found that he wasn't lying.

Labour have rewritten the MP's job description, there is no longer a requirement to represent the constituents views. Our MP's will only be required to support and represent their parties views. He's changing the rules, he's stacking power against us. Its clear he wants bureaucracy to rule every aspect of society while being unaccountable to us.

https://endtimesprophecywatch.com/2025/10/11/one-world-religion-as-prophesied-the-abrahamic-family-house-take-a-look/