Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/30/2025 in all areas

  1. Curious (yeah right) how this hasn't been mentioned in the MSM. Did we have any consultation about this? Our Plod now look like Man City on an away day in the Champions League.
    5 points
  2. I think I saw that interview a while ago, and vaguely recall him alluding to that, it certainly explains SOME things, but there is still much, that makes no fucking sense has anyone here, seen The Agenda, Their Vision, Your Future, on you tube, amazed it's still on here, it presents the WEF/UN/NWO seeming AGENDA 2030 thing, truly mental
    2 points
  3. Yawn.. if there was 'work' around then young people would move into it without further ado. This will be Thatcherite-style make work scheme aimed at reducing the headline unemployment figures. Reeves and Co are employees of Lubner, Roden and other wealthy businessmen who do well out of the neoliberal, neocon consensus. Incidentally, guess what's back: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3rv3y9jnryo 'Vaccinations' still available for the over 75s..pension savings later I guess.
    2 points
  4. There is no need to think of those days... the suffering and dying is still happening to some of the jabbed, the loss of jobs, income and dignity is still happening to many in the west... and all under the veil, behind the curtain. The message I've been getting is that until it happens to them individually, nobody is going to give a toss... and that is the greatest crime.
    2 points
  5. ...so, here we are. Hello all. I am experiencing the world as a male in my 40s with a female significant other and a father of 2 young children. Live in Scotland and have what would be described as a comfortable life. I think too much, always have... refuse to follow illogical rules and I hate being told what to do. The illusions of the system has been shattered... it's all nonsense... Trapped inside the 9-5 system, mortgage, job, bills, tax tax tax and more tax... So, becoming more aware everyday but remain a reluctant slave... Summary of beliefs JFK- killed by the cult Mandela - remember him dying in prison 9/11 -controlled demolishion London Red Bus explosion- the UKs 9/11 Covid - Real Bioweapon in form of weaponised virus + weaponised gene therapies plus they wated COmmon Vaccine ID Fully believe consciousness creates reality and perception moulds consciousness... Lots of other stuff... A few lucid dreams of spiritual events that have impacted my everyday life... smile and wave boys, smile and wave. Cars, not football Dan
    2 points
  6. Very. It's a straw man to paint the opposition like that. On the other hand, what does he mean that we've always been progressive? Being progressive for its own sake implies there's no end, no vision he's working towards, just carrying on in the same direction whether it's good or not. If division is a bad thing, does he want to wipe out any and all distinctions between us? They've already got the class war to end economic division. Gender ideology to end biological distinctions. Critical race theory and the Kalergi plan to merge us all into one race. Is the end game of progressives to put us through a blender and make us all into a homogeneous blob all the same, total globohomo equality and sameness without variety? Apart from the cabal elites of course.
    2 points
  7. Justice delayed is justice denied. Saw that slogan on the sign of a protester. There will never be formal justice for covid. Too many accomplises. The trials would become perpetual and very expensive. Especially when that bottomless pit of money, pharma, dispatches squadrons of ivy-league lawyers to muddle things up and turn it into a circus. Only people making better informed choices will be the justice for that if ever the popular will to reform gains traction. The justice in the fact that such madness has been well contained by removing opportunities and behaving responsibly.
    2 points
  8. Our human history has plenty of examples of societal disdain for those perceived as not carrying their share of the popular load. In this respect, the society based on contribution has always existed. A recycled ideology. The popular notion having always been that all must do their part in the great social experiment or be cast out, dehumanized. A slaver's paradise. What is novel is the scope and tools of compliance offered by technological advancement. Otherwise it's old shoe.
    2 points
  9. Andy Burnham - ( most likely controlled opposition ) “I feel we’re heading towards an election that is a choice of two world views; one view a progressive view; the values that have shaped the country that we’ve always known and always lived in, or something much darker and very divisive. That in many ways will be what is in-front of the country” ( How loaded is that )
    2 points
  10. “Reeves and Starmer spoke to young people at a career’s hub, as she prepares to unveil beefed up efforts to get young people into work … will guarantee that every young person on UC for 18 months without earning or learning will be offered a work placement. Reeves will frame this as part of government efforts to build a society based on contribution - a buzz word we can expect to hear more of … with November’s budget in mind. On the blackboard at the hub the Wi-Fi code is “Thrive 2020!”
    2 points
  11. Thanks for checking in. I appreciate it. I have just been swamped with other things at the moment, so I haven't had a lot of time. At least I haven't been snatched by men with sunglasses driving a black SUV. Though I am concerned regarding @Katsika. She is usually quite active. I hope she is okay.
    2 points
  12. 2 points
  13. This is going to be hard to write, very distasteful. I know what I am advocating here and I think heaven weeps for it. My sympathies was always with the Palestinians. To me, the Jews were occupiers. Its a long and complicated history, the Jews were mostly forced to Palestine during the Second World war, after Hitler had of course robbed them. So after centuries of persecution they were forced into Palestine. I always understood that it was the Balfour Treaty that created Israel as a home for the Jews, but the fact is not many took it up until Hitler came along. So the Jews found themselves in Palestine. They built their homeland, then there was the conflicts, the Israel Palestine wars. many times there was a possibility of peace and many times it disappeared and descended back to conflict. For me, my sympathies laid with the Palestinians. They had the Jews dumped on them, partly at Britain's behest, and they had to put up with it. So they decided to fight. I could understand it, and partly, my sympathies were with them. Then October 7th happened. Everything changed. Hamas have shown themselves to be capable of the most vile crimes and hostility to the Jews. I'm not going to list the atrocities they did, everyone should by now know what those terrorists did and that they have sworn they will not stop until every Jew is annihilated. Well Israel cannot negotiate with people like that, they cannot. And they cannot allow the Palestinians back into Gaza to allow Hamas to launch another terror attack like October 7th. How many times must they suffer this? If Hamas are going to use Civilian infrastructure and the people as military assets and the Palestinians are not going to blow the whistle when they see tunnels being dug out under their hospitals, then the Palestinians become military targets. I am sorry, it pains me to write this. Because of the loss of innocence. The innocent that are going to die and the innocence that will be lost on both sides. on BOTH sides, there will be loss of life and loss of innocence. Israel must put weapons in the hands of their sons and daughters of this generation and tell them to go and commit murder on other human beings, and they will carry that burden for the rest of their lives and some of them will not come back. And the loss of innocent Palestinian lives who did not want this war but are being used as military assets by a fanatical extremist terror organization. There will be loss of life and innocence on BOTH sides. As far as I'm concerned, after Oct 7th, Israel has the moral right, and duty, to protect itself from these barbaric enemies. Hamas have stated they want nothing less than the complete destruction of the Jews. Hamas have shown they will use absolutely disgusting tactics that have no place in a theatre of war against the Jewish people and have vowed never to stop. The Israeli people cannot live under that threat, and it is too late to turn back history now. Israel cannot just cease to exist, there are generations there who have been born and raised in that country, it is now their home too. Israel has no choice, it must defend itself and the generation of Israelis who have to go and do this 'job' will suffer the burden, as will the innocent Palestinians who did not want this war. On another thread this article was posted. Why Is the Liberal Media Inciting Genocide? Israelis and Ukrainians are the only "right-wing extremist Nazis." But the liberal Establishment loves them. Why? Kevin Barrett 9 Dec 2023 https://www.bitchute.com/video/qNlj3yZTxZnu/ In case you hadn’t noticed, the liberal media, and the liberal Establishment behind it, hates “right-wing extremists.” Since 2016, when Trump was elected on a control-the-borders platform, “right-wing extremism” has replaced “Islamic terrorism” as the new bogeyman. Don’t like mandatory vaccines and COVID lockdowns? You’re a “right-wing extremist” and deserve to be censored. Don’t like censorship? You’re defending “right-wing extremists” so you must be one yourself. Don’t like the war on Russia? You must be a “right-wing extremist” like Putin, who is the new Hitler because he doesn’t like LGBTQ indoctrination and mandatory sex change surgery for toddlers. In the past, being antiwar, pro-free-speech, pro-civil-liberties, and pro-alternative-medicine put you on the left side of the spectrum. Now those are all signs of “right-wing extremism.” What’s so terrible about all this “right-wing extremism”? Ultimately, it’s all about the Nazis. If you are pro-free-speech, you’re giving a platform to Nazis. If you support the COVID dissidents, you must like that one guy with the swastika tattoo at the rally where RFK Jr. spoke. And if you don’t support the war on Russia, and refuse to click your heels and sig heil for Zelensky, it must be because you are a follower of the new Hitler, Vladimir Putin. The logic goes something like this: Right-wing extremists are Nazis. Nazis, as we all know, commit genocide. Therefore if we allow extremists to support border control, oppose war on Russia, speak their minds without censorship, and practice alternative medicine instead of masking and jabbing, one thing will lead to another and pretty soon they’ll be committing genocide. You might say it’s the new domino theory. What makes the whole thing even crazier is that there are really only two places on Earth where “right-wing extremist Nazis” are committing genocide: Israel under fuhrer Netanyahu, and Ukraine under fuhrer Zelenksy. But the liberal media, despite its ostensible hatred of right-wing extremist Nazis, supports both genocides! Zelinsky’s effort to murder and expel the Russian-speaking people of Eastern Ukraine, and obliterate the culture of any who remain, is a textbook case of genocide, and a direct descendant of Hitler’s lebensraum project with its planned murder and expulsion of millions of Slavs. And Netanyahu’s even bloodier attempt to murder and expel the Palestinians is orders of magnitude worse—probably worse than anything Hitler ever did. Both Zelensky’s Ukraine and Netanyahu’s Israel are fanatical right-wing ultra-nationalist regimes, built on exaltation of a “master race” (Ukrainians/Jews in one case, and just plain Jews in the other) and the genocidal demonization of the untermenschen (Russian-speaking Christians in Ukraine, Palestinians in Palestine). These two regimes are the apotheosis of everything pro-tolerance, anti-racist, pro-multiculturalism liberals profess to hate. And yet the liberal Establishment loves them, and even runs nonstop pro-genocide propaganda on their behalf. Whatever can those liberals be thinking? End of article. Basically its trying to justify Hamas action against Israel. Hamas stated goal is to achieve an Islamicate state of Palestine. The man who wrote this is a Muslim Scholar in America. So lets be clear, these deranged men, Hamas, raped and mutilated babies, and these sick paedophiles want to run a country under their interpretation of Islamic law. So if you support Hamas your advocating for a bunch of sick, depraved paedophiles, who mercilessly oppress women, use their own people as military assets to be sacrificed, who use religion to justify their actions, to be in charge of a country, sitting at the UN and lecturing us on morals.
    1 point
  14. Remember listening to Mandela's "walk to freedom" on radio in 1990. But there have been many other times where I've had the Mandela Effect and only know a different memory to the one now being commonly pushed or found online.
    1 point
  15. NASA (acronym) - "Need Another Seven Astronauts"
    1 point
  16. Hi mate.Welcome. Agree with all you said apart from Mandela. I was in the country when he was released. I've just hit 50, and it seems my age group 50+ recall that aswell. A puzzling thing this Mandela effect..
    1 point
  17. Whatever cult or secret society our overlords and minions immerse themselves in, they all believe in dehumanizing and depopulating us. In case you missed it, here is George Bernard Shaw (a Fabian).
    1 point
  18. BBC Quote Trump and Netanyahu agree new Gaza peace plan Trump: Hamas has ‘3 to 4 days’ to accept Gaza plan We need one signature; that signature will pay in hell if they don’t sign, I hope they sign. Sir Tony Blair would help oversee Gaza transition under US plan to end the war End quote
    1 point
  19. HIS BEST MATE SOOTY WAS TURNED DOWN FOR ONE BECAUSE HIS NAME DIDN'T SOUND VERY ENGLISH!
    1 point
  20. Can't count to four?
    1 point
  21. There is not enough information at the moment to draw any conclusions as to who was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk All that we can say is that official narrative is ridiculous. Why is the official account ridiculous? 1. There is no way Charlie Kirk was shot with a thirty aught six round. For gun enthusiasts this is known as the Springfield cartridge. It is a monster projectile leaving the barrel with 3,000-foot pounds of force. Or put another way, it would lift a 3,000-pound object one foot in the air. Over a distance of 150 yards, it loses none of its original power. At 150 yards it will pass through a 1/2-inch-thick steel plate like butter. It would have blown Charlie Kirk's neck apart before passing through anyone and anything behind him. The round is used for big game hunting like a moose or a grizzly bear. Kirk wasn't hit by any high-powered rifle. It was a lower caliber round. 2. Originally there was no autopsy, then there was an autopsy, and the bullet was discovered just beneath the skin by his neck. Yeah, a human neck and skin will stop a Springfield round! The human neck is hollow with a lot of Cartlidge. It's not that strong. No way! 3. The CCTV footage was wide enough to catch the alleged shooter in position and taking the shot. Yet, we are only shown footage of him running across the roof a few seconds afterwards. What is the FBI hiding? 4. The so-called confession note left for the alleged shooter's furry boyfriend was clearly written by Chat-GPT. It used the language of law enforcement, not college kids. 5. The security detail is problematic. There is no reaction to the gun fire. As if it was expected. 6. At the time of the lethal shot the security detail were looking at Charlie Kirk. Why? They should be watching the crowd. You don't watch the protected person. 7. When Kirk was hit, instead of rendering aid the security detail went into a well-rehearsed drill and started breaking down the crime scene and removing evidence. Such as camera flashcards. A very odd priority. At this stage we can say is that whoever was behind had the security detail on their side. Possible motives would include: Israel: Charlie Kirk was starting to question the Israeli lobby on the stand down on 6 October (or whenever it was). Kirk was very influential among young voters, and the Israel lobby couldn't tolerate Kirk pushing people away. Israeli donors had cancelled donations a few days before the assassination. Against Mossad being involved is the poor cover up and the fact the patsy wasn't killed. I think Mossad would have done a better job. Though that is not to say Israeli donors, independent of Mossad, weren't involved. Insiders with Turning Point: Candace Owens had reported that a lot of money had gone missing and Kirk was suspicious. The fact it was not a very good coverup may indicate that it is a group below intelligence services. But, at this stage, there is no evidence of who was behind it. We know it wasn't a lapel mic gun. That suggestion is absurd. I think it is Stew Peters that came up with that lemon. How do we know it is absurd? Because when a bullet leaves a gun there is recoil. If you've fired a bolt action rifle, you'll know all about it. The lapel mic would have recoiled and ripped straight through his t-shirt. Even with a 22 round. Which is all that would fit. At this stage I would go as far as to say definite coverup, the patsy wasn't the shooter, and an inside job. But I have no idea what he was shot with, by whom, and who took out the contract.
    1 point
  22. Although I am no big fan of him, Dominic Cummings alluded to the fact in a (rare to find) interview. To the fact that nobody in the house of commons has any power whatsoever. The most powerful is the PM and his Private Secretary (was McSweeney). They are all handed a script by PTB, and must not deviate. The whole thing is a Theatre, and probably the same all over the Western world. Bread and Circuses.
    1 point
  23. I'll never forget or forgive those lying fuckers on our screens day and night, peddling their pseudo-scientific garbage that was little more than a massive behavioural experiment. Scaring and confusing millions of vulnerable and impressionable people....many like my poor Mum who never mentally recovered from the constant crap being beamed into her living room.
    1 point
  24. Why People Can't See The Truth: Yuri Bezmenov 1939-1993 was a KGB informant and disinformation expert who defected to Canada. He is best remembered for his anti-communist lectures and books in the 1980s. "Exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures...he will refuse to believe it.. That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization." Once people's morals have been debased... Education becomes indoctrination Entertainment becomes hypnotism Criminals become 'leaders,' and.. Lies become truth. - unattributed
    1 point
  25. I don't think so. Most old people know they have sufficient ID already (and they or their parents remember WWII and ID) so even if they not aware of globalism they think it is a stupid, expensive, unnecessary idea. They've paid for the NHS and have an NHS number, why do they need anything else? If they are old, they probably no longer work, but pensions are already paid for, so why do they need a new system? Already have a bus pass, and could get it with existing ID, so why a new system? Waste of money when times are hard. Of course, if you are in your 20s, "Old" may mean something different to you.
    1 point
  26. Iain Davis has produced an article on Substack concerning how he thinks Starmer's BritCard digital ID announcement is a psyop and destined to be a flop. Davis previously collaborated with Whitney Webb two years ago to expose the UN's Agenda 2030 sustainable development goal 16 (SDG16) which he feels is the real end goal with failure of the BritCard as a stepping stone towards this. Both articles are long but worth taking the time to read. https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-britcard-digital-id-psyop https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/10/investigative-reports/sdg16-part-2-enforcing-digital-identity/ The seemingly lofty ideal proposed via SDG16 is to "promote peaceful and inclusive societies and to provide access to justice for all" and one of the elements of that involves ensuring every person on the planet has a legal identity so that they can be included in society. The UN later convened the ID2020 Summit and established the ID2020 Alliance to set the "future course of digital identity" whilst "enabling access to digital ID for every person on the planet". The "noble objective" behind this supposedly "humanitarian cause" involves those who are invisible within societies such as refugees, women and children. Back to the BritCard narrative, there are loud objections coming from all corners including from so-called "far right" opponents Reform, Rupert Lowe and Tommy Robinson. One of the main criticisms is that we already have so many other forms of ID including national insurance numbers which already provides people in Britain with the right to work. Why do we need another form of ID? Non-compliance is seemingly being promoted whilst others are questioning the sanity of the scheme and the economic implications if people are rendered unable to work. Another concern is that any digital ID system will simply not be secure enough and that our personal data could be at risk of hacking and fraud. Former PM Liz Truss has further implied that the UK government's IT systems are pretty crap helping to undermine confidence in the scheme. In his Substack article, Davis points out how Starmer has decided to announce this scheme at a point where popularity in his government couldn't be lower. As he puts it: Davis posits that the BritCard is a Trojan Horse which will be discarded along with the Labour government with our "political saviours, be they the Tories, Reform or whatever" "promising never to subject us to any more of these idiotic government issued ID schemes". However, our existing forms of ID "will need to be upgraded to facilitate the necessary interoperability". It seems entirely possible that a global digital ID system will be touted as the solution to the various objections that are being made about BritCard. Worries about needing yet another form of ID could be assauged with reassurances that our ability to work won't be affected and our existing forms will remain but just that the systems behind them will become "interoperable". Remaining concerns about immigration could be soothed with promises surrounding its harmonisation across borders and its global reach. If you have worries about data security, Alliance say their blockchain system is unhackable whilst providing the benefits of outsourcing to the global professionals who know what they're doing rather than trusting to our hopelessly inept domestic government(s). Another point made by Davis and Webb in their joint article is that, in order to implement digital ID globally, different approaches will need to be made to different populations. In the UK, we have rejected ID cards many times over meaning that the approach here necessitates deceit, stealth and leveraging. Starmer's government are specifically targeting our ability to work, earn a living and secure housing thus playing on people's fears about feeding themselves and their families whilst keeping a roof over their heads. As long as the ability to earn money is preserved, a seemingly watered down alternative may be deemed acceptable. I think there is some merit in the contention that Starmer's domestic proposal is meant to fail because the objective is for GLOBAL digital ID which needless to say, whilst touted as a humanitarian objective, is not about empowering the world's poor through financial inclusion. A choice will supposedly be given but failure to acquiesce will lead to dire consequences with Alliance acknowledging that people will be locked out. Whilst the UK has doubtless been flooded with immigrants in order to bring in digital IDs, the current proposal seems unlikely to be the end goal. It might be portrayed as a victory in the event that it is ditched, however, an even more widely encompassing "solution" may emerge from under our noses.
    1 point
  27. to many agents and trolls are active here for this to be allowed..... we have enough attacks as it is ,sneaky intentional posts ect.
    1 point
  28. and brain washing,and programing and manipulating ....
    1 point
  29. This was the fakest crap I've ever heard in my life. This is political theatre at it's worst.
    1 point
  30. You named it. Her high drama speeches clinched it for me. Where have they hidden Charlie?
    1 point
  31. I remember Jesse Ventura conspiracy show touching on mass casualty event planning. “Mega Death!” It will be needed one day…. Pandemic. Civil War. Comet. Bio weapon. Nuke. Time will tell. In the meantime folks stock up on the essentials! At the very worst all it means is you have a bit of excess food to get through.
    1 point
  32. They're switching of 3G for a reason, to herd people into 4G and obviously 5G and so forth. My phone is 3 and 4G compatible yet supplier is saying it isn't and I need to upgrade, which will be 4 and 5G no doubt. I did get a macabre "feel" recently about when they will push things this year/next year and all those around me would be susceptible. Was weird as I don't think about that now, just live as best I can.
    1 point
  33. I was introduced to this subject earlier this year following a show on RichPlanet. The following is from a blog by one of his guests, Danielle Bryant: Read full article here: https://www.daniellebryant.co.uk/2019/09/25/the-wisdom-of-german-new-medicine/ Richard D Hall had Danielle and her husband Lloyd, who both run the ShopHolistic website, on his show in January 2020 to talk about this subject, and the show includes clips featuring Caroline Markolin, PhD who was one of Dr Hamer’s students and works to keep his research unadulterated and true to Dr Hamer’s findings. Also at: https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=280&part=1&gen=99
    1 point
  34. It is certainly interesting stuff, if you are prepared to look at things like this with an open mind. I'm no doctor or medical professional, and I myself in no way advocate this stuff as 'absolute' or definite, but I do think it is worthy of at least 'thinking about' or taking into consideration.
    1 point
  35. Looks very interesting, I'm definitely going to look into this. If it could help my Mrs that would be awesome.
    1 point
  36. Thanks so much for this post Grumpy Owl, I have been studying German New Medicine ever since and find it absolutely fascinating. I would recommend everyone to study it, as health is so important in these stress filled times, especially when you're getting on! I think that the first of the Laws called the Iron Rule of Cancer is especially important, bearing in mind the barbaric treatment that is seen as the best that can be offered by main stream medicine. I think that Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer was a true genius. Needless to say he was persecuted by the main stream medical establishment. There is a German New Medicine Facebook page as well, unfortunately it won't embed, so you will have to copy and paste into a browser. https://www.facebook.com/groups/GNMUK/?multi_permalinks=3027569844019649&notif_id=1598906372348525&notif_t=group_highlights&ref=notif
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...