Leaderboard

I'll never forget or forgive those lying fuckers on our screens day and night, peddling their pseudo-scientific garbage that was little more than a massive behavioural experiment. Scaring and confusing millions of vulnerable and impressionable people....many like my poor Mum who never mentally recovered from the constant crap being beamed into her living room.

Although I am no big fan of him, Dominic Cummings alluded to the fact in a (rare to find) interview. To the fact that nobody in the house of commons has any power whatsoever. The most powerful is the PM and his Private Secretary (was McSweeney). They are all handed a script by PTB, and must not deviate. The whole thing is a Theatre, and probably the same all over the Western world. Bread and Circuses.

@tommo you joined on June 19th and have posted 41 times, but you sound like you're more familiar with this place than a total newcomer would be? Did you used to be here under a different name? (Many of the old guard were banned by a rogue mod/admin years ago, so it's not unusual).

I imagine that, as in the Covid days, the likes of communist Susan Michie, SPI-B and that ilk are working in the shadows to find ways to embed the global agenda on the unsuspecting public whilst driving behavioural change. Credit to Iain Davis and Whitney Webb again for the chart below concerning the set up of the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) - the global network of "stakeholder partners" linked to the UN's agenda - including where its policies originate and how these are cascaded and integrated. I am a little cautious about making firm predictions especially as I believe that the controllers like to keep their options open whilst playing on our fears - however, surveillance and control seem to be definite objectives and I don't think it is outside the realms of possibility that social credit scoring could also be an aim. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/06/investigative-series/sdg16-part-1-building-the-global-police-state/

Iain Davis has produced an article on Substack concerning how he thinks Starmer's BritCard digital ID announcement is a psyop and destined to be a flop. Davis previously collaborated with Whitney Webb two years ago to expose the UN's Agenda 2030 sustainable development goal 16 (SDG16) which he feels is the real end goal with failure of the BritCard as a stepping stone towards this. Both articles are long but worth taking the time to read. https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-britcard-digital-id-psyop https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/10/investigative-reports/sdg16-part-2-enforcing-digital-identity/ The seemingly lofty ideal proposed via SDG16 is to "promote peaceful and inclusive societies and to provide access to justice for all" and one of the elements of that involves ensuring every person on the planet has a legal identity so that they can be included in society. The UN later convened the ID2020 Summit and established the ID2020 Alliance to set the "future course of digital identity" whilst "enabling access to digital ID for every person on the planet". The "noble objective" behind this supposedly "humanitarian cause" involves those who are invisible within societies such as refugees, women and children. Back to the BritCard narrative, there are loud objections coming from all corners including from so-called "far right" opponents Reform, Rupert Lowe and Tommy Robinson. One of the main criticisms is that we already have so many other forms of ID including national insurance numbers which already provides people in Britain with the right to work. Why do we need another form of ID? Non-compliance is seemingly being promoted whilst others are questioning the sanity of the scheme and the economic implications if people are rendered unable to work. Another concern is that any digital ID system will simply not be secure enough and that our personal data could be at risk of hacking and fraud. Former PM Liz Truss has further implied that the UK government's IT systems are pretty crap helping to undermine confidence in the scheme. In his Substack article, Davis points out how Starmer has decided to announce this scheme at a point where popularity in his government couldn't be lower. As he puts it: Davis posits that the BritCard is a Trojan Horse which will be discarded along with the Labour government with our "political saviours, be they the Tories, Reform or whatever" "promising never to subject us to any more of these idiotic government issued ID schemes". However, our existing forms of ID "will need to be upgraded to facilitate the necessary interoperability". It seems entirely possible that a global digital ID system will be touted as the solution to the various objections that are being made about BritCard. Worries about needing yet another form of ID could be assauged with reassurances that our ability to work won't be affected and our existing forms will remain but just that the systems behind them will become "interoperable". Remaining concerns about immigration could be soothed with promises surrounding its harmonisation across borders and its global reach. If you have worries about data security, Alliance say their blockchain system is unhackable whilst providing the benefits of outsourcing to the global professionals who know what they're doing rather than trusting to our hopelessly inept domestic government(s). Another point made by Davis and Webb in their joint article is that, in order to implement digital ID globally, different approaches will need to be made to different populations. In the UK, we have rejected ID cards many times over meaning that the approach here necessitates deceit, stealth and leveraging. Starmer's government are specifically targeting our ability to work, earn a living and secure housing thus playing on people's fears about feeding themselves and their families whilst keeping a roof over their heads. As long as the ability to earn money is preserved, a seemingly watered down alternative may be deemed acceptable. I think there is some merit in the contention that Starmer's domestic proposal is meant to fail because the objective is for GLOBAL digital ID which needless to say, whilst touted as a humanitarian objective, is not about empowering the world's poor through financial inclusion. A choice will supposedly be given but failure to acquiesce will lead to dire consequences with Alliance acknowledging that people will be locked out. Whilst the UK has doubtless been flooded with immigrants in order to bring in digital IDs, the current proposal seems unlikely to be the end goal. It might be portrayed as a victory in the event that it is ditched, however, an even more widely encompassing "solution" may emerge from under our noses.

There is not enough information at the moment to draw any conclusions as to who was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk All that we can say is that official narrative is ridiculous. Why is the official account ridiculous? 1. There is no way Charlie Kirk was shot with a thirty aught six round. For gun enthusiasts this is known as the Springfield cartridge. It is a monster projectile leaving the barrel with 3,000-foot pounds of force. Or put another way, it would lift a 3,000-pound object one foot in the air. Over a distance of 150 yards, it loses none of its original power. At 150 yards it will pass through a 1/2-inch-thick steel plate like butter. It would have blown Charlie Kirk's neck apart before passing through anyone and anything behind him. The round is used for big game hunting like a moose or a grizzly bear. Kirk wasn't hit by any high-powered rifle. It was a lower caliber round. 2. Originally there was no autopsy, then there was an autopsy, and the bullet was discovered just beneath the skin by his neck. Yeah, a human neck and skin will stop a Springfield round! The human neck is hollow with a lot of Cartlidge. It's not that strong. No way! 3. The CCTV footage was wide enough to catch the alleged shooter in position and taking the shot. Yet, we are only shown footage of him running across the roof a few seconds afterwards. What is the FBI hiding? 4. The so-called confession note left for the alleged shooter's furry boyfriend was clearly written by Chat-GPT. It used the language of law enforcement, not college kids. 5. The security detail is problematic. There is no reaction to the gun fire. As if it was expected. 6. At the time of the lethal shot the security detail were looking at Charlie Kirk. Why? They should be watching the crowd. You don't watch the protected person. 7. When Kirk was hit, instead of rendering aid the security detail went into a well-rehearsed drill and started breaking down the crime scene and removing evidence. Such as camera flashcards. A very odd priority. At this stage we can say is that whoever was behind had the security detail on their side. Possible motives would include: Israel: Charlie Kirk was starting to question the Israeli lobby on the stand down on 6 October (or whenever it was). Kirk was very influential among young voters, and the Israel lobby couldn't tolerate Kirk pushing people away. Israeli donors had cancelled donations a few days before the assassination. Against Mossad being involved is the poor cover up and the fact the patsy wasn't killed. I think Mossad would have done a better job. Though that is not to say Israeli donors, independent of Mossad, weren't involved. Insiders with Turning Point: Candace Owens had reported that a lot of money had gone missing and Kirk was suspicious. The fact it was not a very good coverup may indicate that it is a group below intelligence services. But, at this stage, there is no evidence of who was behind it. We know it wasn't a lapel mic gun. That suggestion is absurd. I think it is Stew Peters that came up with that lemon. How do we know it is absurd? Because when a bullet leaves a gun there is recoil. If you've fired a bolt action rifle, you'll know all about it. The lapel mic would have recoiled and ripped straight through his t-shirt. Even with a 22 round. Which is all that would fit. At this stage I would go as far as to say definite coverup, the patsy wasn't the shooter, and an inside job. But I have no idea what he was shot with, by whom, and who took out the contract.

Thanks for checking in. I appreciate it. I have just been swamped with other things at the moment, so I haven't had a lot of time. At least I haven't been snatched by men with sunglasses driving a black SUV. Though I am concerned regarding @Katsika. She is usually quite active. I hope she is okay.

As ever I've got a few books on the go at the moment. Trouble is it takes me longer to read them nowadays, too much time on the internet Lots more on my bookshelf too, I seem to buy books faster than I can read them! Teach Yourself Chess, and Beginning Programming with Python for Dummies. Self-explanatory really. A couple of hobbies to keep my brain active since I retired. The Way Of Wyrd: Tales Of An Anglo-Saxon Sorcerer by Brian Bates 1983. (A classic Heathen novel). "Sent on a mission deep into the forests of pagan Anglo-Saxon England, Wat Brand, a Christian scribe, suddenly finds his vision of the world turned upside down. The familiar English countryside is not what it threatening spirits, birds of omen and plants of power lurk in this landscape of fallen terrors and mysterious forces. With Wulf, a sorcerer and mystic, as his guide, Brand is instructed in the magical lore of plants, runes, fate and the life force until finally he journeys to the spirit world on a quest to encounter the true nature of his own soul." https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/767358.The_Way_Of_Wyrd Heathen Handbook by Woden's Folk Kindred 2020. Introductory handbook to Heathenry by a US community. https://www.wodensfolkkindred.org/our-publications https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07WCTK9DP To read next. The Hooded Man Mysteries: A New Order. - Wulf Ingessunu 2025. https://attackthesystem.com/2025/07/06/out-now-the-hooded-man-mysteries-a-new-order/ Some David Icke books: And the Truth Shall Set You Free, Children of the Matrix, The Trap. The Fall of Western Man - Mark Collett 2017. Far Journeys - Robert Monroe 1985. The Frankfurt School. Social Visionaries or Architects of Ruin? Ed by Troy Southgate 2024. Imagination Transformed. The history, ritual & symbolism of Magick. Ed by Troy Southgate 2024.

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly they can shift the public's focus. The last few weeks it was illegal immigration and St. George's crosses, now it's ID cards with immigration and flags all but forgotten for the time being. They still control the narrative 100%, there's no doubt about that in my mind.

DON'T LET YOUR COUNTRY BE INVADED, JOIN THE GNOME GUARD NOW, EVER LITTLE {PERSON} HELPS, DO YOUR BIT,VOLUNTEER NOW!

Also according to me your behavior and nature of the posts, have all halmarks of pushing agendas ,promoting plans of the rulers ,in one word trolling( like this topoc) why make a option of changing your username available when there is no activiti,no one will change the username not to mention hidden intentions and problems which would arose with it

HIS BEST MATE SOOTY WAS TURNED DOWN FOR ONE BECAUSE HIS NAME DIDN'T SOUND VERY ENGLISH!

I'm more worried about MI5/6, CIA and Mossad. They occasionally keep me awake at night, not the fictional terror groups.

I miss old-time blogging. There used to be lots of fun blogging platforms. I don't do social media. I find that I am ostracized in most work settings maybe since they can't find me on social media. Idk. Several years ago when my daughter was in high school she told me that if you don't have social media, you basically don't exist. That's literally how they look at it!

It hilarious really. If it wasn’t for people dying and livelihoods being lost I’d half expect the coverage to be re shown on Comedy Gold channel.

i think the substack, guy may be giving these clowns too much credit, though it's difficult to tell, but from pure optics/theatrics, most of Boris/Starmer's shit looks laughable/transparent and so fucking stupid, it's either a ruse or they really are like, their scumbag goons behind them, that thick I am really not sure anymore, seeing starmer, never answer a question again, in an interview just confirms this, the only time, he gets into his prefect mode is when no one is challenging him( as he in incapable of answering any fucking question) His prefect mode, when talking about, D ID and how you won't have a job unless you consent to it, is the exact same tone he took when he gaslit an entire nation, many of whom were protesting( and not rioting) regarding southport, dismissing all of them as far right, said it didn't matter why they were protesting and laughably claiming, it was not protest,( many were just protesting) and not rioting I am just not too convinced, the shadow players are always as nessecarily as smart, as some on the forum give them credit for god knows at this point

Moderators were far more assertive then. Often joining the frey to pour fuel on the fires. Like scrapping their motto of impartiability to take sides in hot topics. But still, some kind of order was required and some characters way out there and very combattive. The gems to be found often outweighed that inconvenience tons. The basic foundational truths just sat there laid bare for all to see. A fast gusher of data to be analyzed, tested, digested, and very little time. This information utopia was still under state control. Otherwise we may have observed many many different big discussion platforms. It was obvious they put out no more than they could manage. When reflecting on how long before a significant information dillution or suppression would set in, the metaphorical narrowing of the passage, my mind created images of an anxious state not liking the carrots they put out but needed critically to identify who the voices of dissension belonged to. That information was still tricky to obtain without the right circumstances. Then, I imagined they would remove the tricky stuff that had them all on edge. What they were doing was novel. They feared a domino effect I presume. Now they breathe easier...or was the domino effect they fear a delayed reaction? Time will mitigate that issue. I say the initial ripples are still resonating and leading somewhere they won't like.

I'm so grateful we were in those times. Every article had more links to more info, click, click, click. I absorbed it all day and night, all night sometimes lol. Not sure I remember all of it, but daymn....I miss those days. Now.... Tinternet is close to pointless for info.

The Millenials and Gen.Z fucked it up.

It was teaming with life back then. I remember the old forum well. I remember getting one of my topics deleted for calling out Alex Jones. Some of the mods were strange. Irc chat was still great as well well into the 2000s. The internet is not very good now

I know you are human. Not hard to tell.

2009 although things were pretty dark people seemed more human. 2010 -11-12 onwards the social media starting becoming more popular it was the death of the wild west of internet this afternoon 2014 onwards. Before then people could say pretty much anything on the internet and you didn't take it seriously. It didn't help you get all the dumb celebrities on what was then Facebook insta Twitter etc and then getting offended like it's real life. Even though things were vapid and on a dark trajectory in the 2000s, it was much nicer time. Although there is a theory that we were put into a different timeline from 2001 onwards after 9/11. There is something extremely dark about the current humans. Another interesting theory and it definitely isn't one of my theories but something that I find deeply interesting is we've gone from an analog world to a digital world. The universe is supposedly analog, digital is alien. I don't know the technicalities behind it as I haven't researched it but apparently digital is alien to humans whilst analog isn't. Also what you can't deny is the decay of innocence in people. Hyper sexualisation. Now I'm not some purest who thinks sex is bad or whatever it's why we are here. But sex is everywhere. Some girls! And women walk around and sometimes it looks like they are wearing nothing but underwear. I know this isn't nessesarily new, but whoredom is being promoted on the white Europeans in particular. And then they wonder why people arent turned on by lingerie anymore. Hyper normalisation of sexuality. In my opinion eventually you get a society full of peadophilia, necrophilia, and beastility and other forms of perversion. It's really not good.

Not seen much of @Katsika& @SoundOfSilence Hope you both ok.

I have wondered about the motive of whoever it was that invented the story. I have also wondered about whether the person responsible for publishing it on the Daily Mail website knew it was invented, when they did so. When I first posted the story on this thread I did do a quick internet search and, as far as I could tell, saw that none of the other MSM outlets had posted it. I didn't have the time to investigate further then, but I was admittedly surprised to later learn that the story was a complete fabrication. I thought that there would have at least been some 'bits' of truth in there. Not that I trust the Daily Mail at all, but that's not the way the MSM usually lies. Not intentionally, anyway.