Leaderboard

Iain Davis has produced an article on Substack concerning how he thinks Starmer's BritCard digital ID announcement is a psyop and destined to be a flop. Davis previously collaborated with Whitney Webb two years ago to expose the UN's Agenda 2030 sustainable development goal 16 (SDG16) which he feels is the real end goal with failure of the BritCard as a stepping stone towards this. Both articles are long but worth taking the time to read. https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/the-britcard-digital-id-psyop https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/10/investigative-reports/sdg16-part-2-enforcing-digital-identity/ The seemingly lofty ideal proposed via SDG16 is to "promote peaceful and inclusive societies and to provide access to justice for all" and one of the elements of that involves ensuring every person on the planet has a legal identity so that they can be included in society. The UN later convened the ID2020 Summit and established the ID2020 Alliance to set the "future course of digital identity" whilst "enabling access to digital ID for every person on the planet". The "noble objective" behind this supposedly "humanitarian cause" involves those who are invisible within societies such as refugees, women and children. Back to the BritCard narrative, there are loud objections coming from all corners including from so-called "far right" opponents Reform, Rupert Lowe and Tommy Robinson. One of the main criticisms is that we already have so many other forms of ID including national insurance numbers which already provides people in Britain with the right to work. Why do we need another form of ID? Non-compliance is seemingly being promoted whilst others are questioning the sanity of the scheme and the economic implications if people are rendered unable to work. Another concern is that any digital ID system will simply not be secure enough and that our personal data could be at risk of hacking and fraud. Former PM Liz Truss has further implied that the UK government's IT systems are pretty crap helping to undermine confidence in the scheme. In his Substack article, Davis points out how Starmer has decided to announce this scheme at a point where popularity in his government couldn't be lower. As he puts it: Davis posits that the BritCard is a Trojan Horse which will be discarded along with the Labour government with our "political saviours, be they the Tories, Reform or whatever" "promising never to subject us to any more of these idiotic government issued ID schemes". However, our existing forms of ID "will need to be upgraded to facilitate the necessary interoperability". It seems entirely possible that a global digital ID system will be touted as the solution to the various objections that are being made about BritCard. Worries about needing yet another form of ID could be assauged with reassurances that our ability to work won't be affected and our existing forms will remain but just that the systems behind them will become "interoperable". Remaining concerns about immigration could be soothed with promises surrounding its harmonisation across borders and its global reach. If you have worries about data security, Alliance say their blockchain system is unhackable whilst providing the benefits of outsourcing to the global professionals who know what they're doing rather than trusting to our hopelessly inept domestic government(s). Another point made by Davis and Webb in their joint article is that, in order to implement digital ID globally, different approaches will need to be made to different populations. In the UK, we have rejected ID cards many times over meaning that the approach here necessitates deceit, stealth and leveraging. Starmer's government are specifically targeting our ability to work, earn a living and secure housing thus playing on people's fears about feeding themselves and their families whilst keeping a roof over their heads. As long as the ability to earn money is preserved, a seemingly watered down alternative may be deemed acceptable. I think there is some merit in the contention that Starmer's domestic proposal is meant to fail because the objective is for GLOBAL digital ID which needless to say, whilst touted as a humanitarian objective, is not about empowering the world's poor through financial inclusion. A choice will supposedly be given but failure to acquiesce will lead to dire consequences with Alliance acknowledging that people will be locked out. Whilst the UK has doubtless been flooded with immigrants in order to bring in digital IDs, the current proposal seems unlikely to be the end goal. It might be portrayed as a victory in the event that it is ditched, however, an even more widely encompassing "solution" may emerge from under our noses.

Good post Eve Though we are being flooded for Kalergi plan and sleeper cell objectives, as well as ushering in the digi-prison cell tech

I imagine that, as in the Covid days, the likes of communist Susan Michie, SPI-B and that ilk are working in the shadows to find ways to embed the global agenda on the unsuspecting public whilst driving behavioural change. Credit to Iain Davis and Whitney Webb again for the chart below concerning the set up of the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) - the global network of "stakeholder partners" linked to the UN's agenda - including where its policies originate and how these are cascaded and integrated. I am a little cautious about making firm predictions especially as I believe that the controllers like to keep their options open whilst playing on our fears - however, surveillance and control seem to be definite objectives and I don't think it is outside the realms of possibility that social credit scoring could also be an aim. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/06/investigative-series/sdg16-part-1-building-the-global-police-state/

I'm sure the Uni-Party will find a scripture to revoke the right to bear arms.

F*ck it I couldn't resist.

In February 2021 I copied two paragraphs from the wikipedia page on mRNA vaccines when I was trying to talk some old friends of mine out of getting the jab. This is what it said in the article: "Up until 2020, these mRNA biotech companies had poor results testing mRNA drugs for cardiovascular, metabolic and renal diseases; selected targets for cancer; and rare diseases like Crigler–Najjar syndrome, with most finding that the side-effects of mRNA insertion were too serious. mRNA vaccines for human use have been developed and tested for the diseases rabies, Zika, cytomegalovirus, and influenza, although none of these mRNA vaccines have been licensed. Many large pharmaceutical companies abandoned the technology, while some biotechs re-focused on the less profitable area of vaccines, where the doses would be at lower levels and side-effects reduced." "Before 2020, no mRNA drug or vaccine had been licensed for use in humans. In December 2020, both Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech obtained emergency use authorization for their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, which had been funded by Operation Warp Speed (directly in the case of Moderna and indirectly for Pfizer/BioNTech). On 2 December 2020, seven days after its final eight-week trial, the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), became the first global medicines regulator in history to approve an mRNA vaccine, granting "emergency authorization" for Pfizer/BioNTech's BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine for widespread use." I checked the page again six months later and the first paragraph had been completely re-written. The current article mentions clinical trials four times, but the 'poor results' have miraculously become a 'successful use' of the technology, and the 'serious side-effects' have disappeared altogether. "The first human clinical trial using ex vivo dendritic cells transfected with mRNA encoding tumor antigens (therapeutic cancer mRNA vaccine) was started in 2001. Four years later, the successful use of modified nucleosides as a method to transport mRNA inside cells without setting off the body's defense system was reported. Clinical trial results of an mRNA vaccine directly injected into the body against cancer cells were reported in 2008." "The first human clinical trials using an mRNA vaccine against an infectious agent (rabies) began in 2013. Over the next few years, clinical trials of mRNA vaccines for a number of other viruses were started. mRNA vaccines for human use were studied for infectious agents such as influenza, Zika virus, cytomegalovirus, and Chikungunya virus." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MRNA_vaccine Unfortunately I didn't take a screenshot in 2021.

The more I see the aftermath of what allegedly took place, the more I have my doubts. The biggest thing for me is his wife. It just doesn't strike me as genuine. Constantly looking up at the sky (as if she is looking towards God)...it just doesn't come across as genuine...and this is coming from a Christian. I see many of the theological leaders, podcasters and pastors that I listen to get sucked in with all this hysteria where we are now seeing, in my opinion, a fake kind of revival within our religion/faith. People like JD Vance and Trump are no more a Christian than I am a Buddhist. Yet, somehow, intelligent people seem to be totally sucked-in with the whole play that is unfolding.

Lot of people talking about 'selective outrage' Where waa your outrage for Syrian civilians? Yemeni? Congo? Millions dead. Where was the outrage and accusations of Genocide in those cases? Silence.

Could new comet C/2025 R2 (SWAN) become visible to the naked eye in October? Here's what we know.. Could new comet C/2025 R2 (SWAN) become visible to the naked eye in October? Here's what we know Then we have this very interesting whatever it is..a lot of talk about this last few months is it a spaceship is it a comet nope or is it a cover story for else.. “Physics Doesn’t Work Anymore”: Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Traveling Backwards At 130,000 MPH Shatters Every Scientific Law In a groundbreaking astronomical find, the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS, exhibiting unprecedented chemical and orbital characteristics, is captivating scientists worldwide as it travels through our solar system, challenging long-held astronomical theories. "Physics Doesn't Work Anymore": Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Traveling Backwards At 130,000 MPH Shatters Every Scientific Law

I'll never forget or forgive those lying fuckers on our screens day and night, peddling their pseudo-scientific garbage that was little more than a massive behavioural experiment. Scaring and confusing millions of vulnerable and impressionable people....many like my poor Mum who never mentally recovered from the constant crap being beamed into her living room.

Why People Can't See The Truth: Yuri Bezmenov 1939-1993 was a KGB informant and disinformation expert who defected to Canada. He is best remembered for his anti-communist lectures and books in the 1980s. "Exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures...he will refuse to believe it.. That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization." Once people's morals have been debased... Education becomes indoctrination Entertainment becomes hypnotism Criminals become 'leaders,' and.. Lies become truth. - unattributed

Indeed!!! The curious thing I found back then was this underlying feeling that this amazing portal would stay open and free for a limited time. I suspected they would create huge censorship heirachy and sterilize a lot of it, especially the most damning of it. So I worked longer and faster to take as much in as possible. Coming from a culture of near perfect information suppression. I knew old habits die hard and looking at the information superhighway now..well, speed traps everywhere and off ramps closed off. Dead ends etc.. No more free lunch. Shadowban Expressway.

Encouraging them to sacrifice their baby late term with cash incentives. Abortion is awful no matter what the circumstances or when the timing, but sometimes necessary. However, when it's this late, this is another level of evil that cuts the soul all ways.. baby's, parents and our Creators. It's a FU to the Creator, and great loosh for the demons as they feed on humans doing this to their own babies. Needs to be banned nevermind encouraged. Adoption is available, not great as I'm adopted and it wasn't fabulous. But....beats this.

Hope the parents and the smugglers feel very guilty about that

interesting the Kantons that voted it are the Banking and pharma baced kantons the rural farming kantons voted against it mainly french and italien kantons Yes german speaking No

I wondered the same thing. I had the school jabs, then nothing until I started nursing school and had their jabs. I was 19. Then less than two years later I did hear something about MMR and did umm and ahh about letting my son have it. There was no widespread internet back then, and the risk mentioned was minimal cases. So I did go ahead with that. Oh boy how things changed when I got tinternet and then nine11. Those all night link clicking sessions in an uncensored search engine were glorious times. Once I had the info to back up my gut instinct I believed in my discernment. What we saw over last few years was ppl feeling not to get it, the info was there also but still people caved because of the coercion. If people all said No, it would be a different story, but others had genuine fear and did believe the other mainstream info and so that was that.

Saturday Morning BBC Reporter in Liverpool for the Labour conference In advance of the conference the PM had been speaking to The Guardian. He says there is an enemy … We cannot miss out on opportunity … to take the fight to Reform “It’s pretty amazing actually to be here having this conversation. It’s just over a year since he won the election with that landslide victory, we’re now talking about him being in real trouble and his big mission the next few days to try and turn things around.

In my opinion, Reddit is just another establishment controlled social platform, and is certainly a 'mainstream-approved' source of information. I admit I don't know a lot about the history or background of this platform, but it comes across to me as the "mother of all discussion forums" with all manner of topic categories covered. That was probably the original intention, to do away with the multitude of individual 'specialised' bulletin boards and forums that were all over the internet. I have used Reddit as a source of information for certain things I've been looking on the internet for, but I don't think I would ever sign up there and start actively participating - seems riddled with AI bots/helpers, and excessive amounts of spam/advertising. And due to its nature, browsing and navigating to topics of interest is a bit overwhelming. Very much correct, sadly. I remember the early days of social media, even Facebook used to be useful for keeping in touch with people and making new contacts. The turning point was when all these 'free' platforms turned into advertising vehicles. 'User content' was either the bits in between the adverts, or were just adverts themselves. I can scroll through Facebook now, and I hardly see any posts from people I know, its just all low-quality click-bait junk. But what Facebook did was create things called 'Groups'. These basically replaced 'internet discussion forums', but without having any 'topic structure', all you'd see in your feed was whatever was posted most recently. Now we have a "TikTok Generation", whose attention span has been reduced to near zero. What I like most about discussion forums, or even blog articles, is that I can sit and read them, at my own pace and at my own leisure. On social media, if you share written articles, most people only glance at the 'headline' - in my professional capacity, I get exasperated when I take the time to write up articles which I then share on social media, only to find in the comments there are people asking questions that are answered quite clearly in the article I have linked to! But this is a generation of people now for whom a video that is more than 30 seconds long is "boring". Then again, the whole thing with "podcasts" is something that bothers me - it's another substitution for 'reading at your own pace', and there are so many hundreds of hours of podcasts to listen to, where on earth in your day does anyone get time to listen to/watch them?

I‘m not a fan of Maggie but …

Woormwood?