Leaderboard

https://davidicke.com/2025/09/19/please-make-sense-of-this-take-your-time/ Please make sense of this. Take your time …

I agree Zelensky is dodgy in many ways, sometimes I wonder if he's actually working with Putin to destroy Ukraine and ultimately NATO. There are so many things about his background that are circumstantially dodgy that it almost seems too good to be true from a Russian propaganda perspective, like he has been installed as a deliberately dubious character to make Russia look good. I feel that public opinion in the West is shifting in favour of Russia. It's getting to the point where to openly argue against Russia's actions is considered a more "controversial" opinion than to support or be indifferent to what Russia is doing. To support Ukraine is certainly not the path of least resistance any more. As for being indifferent about it and not support either side? Why should I be indifferent? The Russians and Chinese are not indifferent about their hegemony and "geopolitical" power. Why should I be? Am I supposed to be ashamed to be British? I know a lot of people would like me to be. The Russians and Chinese are not ashamed of their history, why should I be? If we just give in, roll over and say our own British/Anglo-Saxon history and culture is shit and worthless, then we will just end up being dominated by the Russian and Chinese/Eurasian system which I guarantee will be worse.

Hi all long time no see, not sure if this has been posted here but I will post .

Ice Age Farmer Christian Westbrook had a bit of a hiatus but has reappeared again on Telegram in recent months. He has picked this story up too.

Which of these men is banned? https://davidicke.com/2025/09/18/which-of-these-men-is-banned/

David Lammy says this sends an immediate message to the gangs. Starmer said he will smash the gangs - and he has. When the gangs realise they can bring over 200 people a day, but we will send 1 a week back - that will smash their business model. Who would pay to come here knowing there is a 1 in 200 chance they will be sent back? Nobody would take that risk. Would they.

Yes. We have deferred responsibility for to long. Now is the time to accept individual responsibility. We can no longer vote for people who we think or hope align to our values, and we should not longer accept big business telling us what's best. The car industry told us for years Petrol was the best choice. But we know now it suppressed other fuels and sold us inefficient engines to maximize profit at the cost of our environment. Supermarkets told us they have the buying power to reduce food costs while agriculture told us mass farming with chemicals would improve our food supply. There are many more examples but I'll have turned out to be false and manipulated to again maximize profits to corporations. We need small farmers, small markets, independent shops, more skills, trades people and investors, engineers etc. We need less centralization, local power generation, small scale nuclear reactors, we need manufacturing jobs. We need to completely change the education system and our political system as well as our legal system. We need to get rid of Shareholders who prioritize themselves over the workforce and the good of the company. We need to look again at many aspects of our system and I believe nationalize water, energy and transport industries. We need yo refund the military drastically. I'm seeing footage of UFO's being fired on by military - not in my fucking name. Why do they get to choose the response to possible contact and why is that response to destroy! It's time to drop the 'old ways' Men in military uniforms or billionaires telling us how society should be - now it's our turn to tell them.

"Splits and divisions" already, and the party doesn't even have a name yet! Sultana accuses Corbyn of 'baseless' character attacks from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn4l3elkzwjo It's not difficult to see that despite Sultana's youthful enthusiasm, there are a number of "seasoned Establishment pros" trying to find ways of making this new party a money-making 'opportunity', in the way that they are trying to set it up. Here's a link to this company on Companies House: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/16359847 Now, while I don't believe that there is anything wrong with a political party setting up a limited company (others do this) for managing/controlling its finances, what I do find interesting is that neither Sultana or Corbyn are listed as directors, unless that changes once the party is 'officially formed' and one or both become 'leaders'. As a comparison, here's a link to UKIP on Companies House: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05090691 As a former member of UKIP, I have an understanding of the party's structure - it is governed by it's NEC (National Executive Committee), which is made up of the party chairman (Ben Walker) and leader (Nick Tenconi), as well as several other elected members, and you can see all of these listed as 'active' directors of the 'company'. (You can also see all former party leaders and NEC members listed as well). Members get to elect a party leader who serves for a fixed-term period (4 years I think). The party leader then appoints the chairman (of the board of directors). NEC members are also elected by other party members for a fixed term, between 2-4 years. All very 'democratic', in my opinion, but at the same time is still very much a 'corporate structure'. As a further comparison, it is interesting to note that 'Reform UK' was only registered as a company in February 2025: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/16260766 I'm sure that those interested in these kinds of things might want to go off and do a 'deep-dive' into the true structure of political parties in the UK, and they will no doubt find that most 'big' political parties are nothing more than 'big corporations', and that government of the UK is nothing more than a 'franchise' operated by these corporations as a tendered contract, awarded by the vote of the electorate at a general election every five years. Any limited company has expenses to cover, and requires income to cover those costs. A political party relies on membership fees for its income, as well as revenue from selling merchandise etc to 'non-members'. But this is where the 'thorny issue' of 'donations' comes in. Anyone can donate money to a political party through 'fundraising', but then you then have the question mark of what is expected in return for any 'donation'. In regards to corruption, one can expect entities or individuals making donations to expect something in return, ie I'll give you money if you lobby for something or adopt policies that makes me wealthier as a result. Even things as trivial as making donations to the party, but in return, the party agrees to buy products and/or services from you exclusively. In that respect, are we really living in a democratic country where political parties are concerned about the interests of the 'ordinary people', or are we all just passengers on a subsidised bus service that operates under contract to the lowest bidder?

I get it now, Thanks very much Eve. (Not sure I want to go down another warren!).

It’s all turning a bit Skynet for me. At the same time the public are squabbling about the residents of hotels it seems the government are giving more control to AI. The day we find peace with the immigrants is when we realise all of the school teachers and police officers have been replaced by a T101.

I think I understand what the software is calculating. I will use your first example of Vladimir Putin with the date 12/31/1999 (US format) to explain. In numerology, letters are converted into numbers depending upon their position in the alphabet. A=1, B=2, C=3 and so on until you reach I=9. The next letter J becomes 1 again and you repeat the sequence. The chart below demonstrates this better than I can probably explain. https://www.astronumero.org/numerology-charts/ When the letters in names / words total more than 9, the digits in the total number are then reduced by adding them together until a single digit is reached. For example if, when its letters are added together, a name amounts to 41, the 4 is added to the 1 which makes a final single digit number of 5. Exception may, however, be made for "master numbers" 11, 22 and 33. In numerological name analysis, vowels and consonants are often treated separately in order to provide different types of analysis. The entire name itself gives rise to an "expression" or "destiny" number surrounding the individual traits an individual is born with. The number derived from just the vowels in the name is known as the "soul urge" revealing the inner self and deepest motivations. The consonants are said to add up to the "personality" number and portrays the outward expression and how somebody appears to others. For dates of birth, all the numbers within the date can be added together to arrive at a "life path" number which is said to predict "the general types of events and circumstances likely to occur as a person lives life". A birth day "core" number can also be arrived at just from the day which "tends to affect the approach a person takes when pursuing goals and opportunities". In your Vladimir Putin example, I will firstly show the workings for the individual name components. The vowel (soul urge) numbers have come from the following vowels in the the name - a (1), i (9), i (9) from Vladimir and u (3) and i (9) from Putin. 1 + 9 + 9 + 3 + 9 = 31 which, reduced to single number, makes 4 - this is what the 31 / 4 means in the total box to the right of the "vowels" box. The data entry field shows the full name entered which corresponds to the "expression" number. All the letters in Vladimir Putin add up to 69 which reduces to 15 and then to 6 hence why the total box to the right reads 69 / 15 / 6. The consonant (personality) numbers derive from v (4), l (3), d (4), m (4), r (9), p (7), t (2) and n (5) which add up to 38. The totals box reduces 38 to 11 and then to 2 hence 38 / 11 / 2. Some analysts may prefer to use the master number 11 in this case rather than reducing further to 2. On the right hand side of the screen shots, there are separate workings for the date entered. Usually this would be the named individual's date of birth but, in your example, a date of 12/31/1999 has been selected. I don't know why this is but I can again offer the workings to you based on this date. The individual digits from the date calculator (1 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 9 + 9 + 9) add up to 35 which then reduces down to 8. This explains the 35 / 8 displayed in the "date total" box. The "month / day" box is displaying the total of 1 + 2 + 3 + 1 = 7. The day within the date of 31 reduces to 4. The final "name + date" box in the bottom right hand corner is taking the totals from both the full name (69) and full date (35) and adding these together to make 104. 104 is then reduced to 14 and 5 hence the 104 / 14 / 5 displayed in this field. Whilst the software is doing the calculation, it is not offering the interpretation (at least within the screenshots given). You may now want to look up the supposed meaning of the numbers separately - there are plenty of numerology sites out there which offer such things. I hope this helps?

In 2024 Hungary had the lowest annual birth rate on record. Will this mean that Hungary will cease to exist as pro mass immigration advocates and globalists will tell you or will it lead to smaller more cohesive societies that start to have more children again. Less Europeans or eventually no Europeans and no white people, just black and brown immigrants and there descendants.

Who do they vote for when they get citizenship?

https://davidicke.com/2025/09/20/us-ambassador-to-israel-mike-huckabee-jews-are-gods-chosen-people-and-the-foundation-of-all-morality/ US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee: Jews are God’s chosen people and the foundation of all morality

This is a f*king joke. Policy paper Nationality and Borders Bill: Border Force powers to stop and seize small boats factsheet Updated 13 October 2023 What’s the problem? We are seeing an unacceptable rise in irregular arrivals from France. These crossings are dangerous, with overloaded boats and busy shipping lanes. The recent tragic events in the Channel with at least 27 men, women and children losing their lives trying to cross the English Channel has sharply brought into focus the need to take action. The British public have had enough of seeing people die in the Channel while ruthless criminal gangs profit from their misery. These crossings are also unnecessary because France is a safe country and people should claim asylum there rather than risk their lives at the hands of criminal smugglers. 2. What does the Nationality and Borders Bill do to strengthen Border Force powers? Providing Border Force with powers to stop and redirect vessels suspected of carrying irregular arrivals out of UK seas or return them to where their sea journey began. Vessels used to facilitate irregular entry by sea to the UK will be able to be seized wherever they are encountered and, quickly disposed of including through donation to charities if appropriate. Putting beyond doubt Border Force’s ability to proactively search unaccompanied containers where there may be irregular entrants hiding in them rather than at present, encountering persons while searching for commodities. The Nationality and Borders Bill does not change the government’s approach to existing obligations under international maritime law, including the duty to protect lives at sea. Organisations and individuals will be able to continue to rescue those in distress at sea as they do now. As is the case today, seafarers should contact the coastguard if they see a vessel in distress and help if they are able to. Seafarers will be protected if they were unable to contact the coastguard for a good reason, such as their phone running out of battery or there not being enough time. 3. What difference will new maritime powers make? Current powers were not designed to combat the significant growth in the use of small boats over the past 2/3 years. The Bill provides greater clarity on being able to use maritime powers to divert vessels out of UK waters, it extends the territoriality scope allowing stop and divert powers to be exercised in international waters and, subject to agreement, in foreign states’ waters, and will for the first time allow intercepted  migrant  vessels to be taken to a non-UK port such as the country the migrants’ vessel started in. Finally, the bill provides far greater flexibility for the seizure and disposal of vessels used to cross the Channel illegally.  The powers do not mean the UK will fail to abide by its international obligations and although there will be no requirement in the new powers to do this, we do not intend to return vessels to another foreign state without first notifying them. Link - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nationality-and-borders-bill-border-force-powers-to-stop-and-seize-small-boats-factsheet/nationality-and-borders-bill-border-force-powers-to-stop-and-seize-small-boats-factsheet So what does it mean? To my mind, the Border Force now has the powers to confiscate small boats. They also have the power to turn the boats around. But they won't do that. The government says it will not turn the boats around unless it speaks to France first. So Border Force would have to stop the small boat in the shipping lanes or international waters. Call base, request a phone call to France to let them know they are turning a boat back, through dangerous shipping lanes. When Border Force encounter a small boat, they really must view those aboard as being in need of assistance, according to the guidance. To hold them back for an hour or two and then send them back would endanger those aboard. So they still 'rescue' them, but now they can give the confiscated boats to charity. If there are people entering illegally, among the refugees, they get higher sentences, but if everyone claims asylum, that is legal and they will provide accommodation and legal assistance. The government will make it easier to allow asylum seekers to bring family members across. The government is proud that so far the UK has taken more asylum seekers than any other European country. The charities will get a financial boost selling the boats.

Men get totally contradictory narratives on violence these days, on one hand many on the "right" tell us that white Europeans are innocent, non-confrontational wallflowers who wouldn't hurt a fly and that violence is the domain of the Muslim and black invaders. On the other hand, on "social media" sites like Twitter/X, you get fed a constant feed of men being brutally assaulted and beating the shit out of each other, and captions like "FAFO", ie "Fuck around and Find out", and violence essentially being glorified and the idea being presented that a "real man" solves his issues and "beefs" with violence. There is a strange duality going on in my opinion, we are at once told that violence is totally alien to our pacifistic and altruistic European/white nature, but also that violence and instant retribution is the highest expression of masculinity and masculine honour. No wonder most men, especially white men, are totally confused these days. I don't think all men are by nature violent, it depends on the individual man in question. Some men are extremely violent and have a hard time controlling it, and some men have no inclination to violence whatsoever and would be less likely to strike you than even most women would be. I think the former group is more likely to be working class, and the latter more likely to be middle class and work in a non-manual profession like office work or academia.

Not surprised in the slightest. This was never about saving money and all about centralising power. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9wxnlnrxdo 'Ministers didn't do cost review of council mergers.' The UK government did not do its own analysis of the cost of the biggest reorganisation of councils in England for decades, the BBC has learned. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said "a significant amount of money" could be saved by merging councils in 21 areas into single authorities. Rayner's department, the ministry of local government, based its cost estimates on a 2020 report commissioned by the County Council Network (CCN) that said £2.9bn could be saved over five years. But the CCN has since revised its analysis and now says the reorganisation could make no savings and actually cost money in some scenarios.

It really should be a George Orwell, War is Peace Award presented by Tony Blair at some prestigious international weapons trade fair.

The good thing is the above article mentions various things antioxidants curcumin, quercetin and green tea extract can apparently neutralize inflammation caused by aluminum accumulation. Natural chelators, such as cilantro, chlorella, ( not sure what modified citrus pectin is which is apparently another?) can apparently help remove heavy metals from the body over time plus magnesium which competes with aluminium to prevent absorption apparently ,sure are other herbs/ foods that detox too perhaps ,spirulina too?

It's not just Trump that's come to this realization; it is a lot of the MAGA movement and a lot of people outside of America too. For example, the Israeli shills like Laura Loomer and Mark Levin are desperately trying to move in on the MAGA movement and claim it as their own. I don't like either of them. Though to come to Laura Loomer's defense she is not totally evil like Mark Levin. Levin went on record saying he doesn't like ceasefires. Really tough guy? I guess it's easy to take that position when you're not the one being bombed. If it was up to me, I would send him to the front lines, not with an M16, but a French throwing axe. A really heavy one that is difficult to lift. But maybe I'm being too kind ...

Digital Identity for all Europeans A personal digital wallet for EU citizens, businesses and residents https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-digital-identity_en Every Member State will need to provide its citizens with at least one EUDI wallet. To ensure that the wallet is usable wherever a person is in the EU, every country must follow the same standards and specifications Large scale pilot projects are testing how the EU Digital Identity Wallets functions in a wide range of situations, before it is launched across the EU. Over 350 companies and public authorities across 26 Member States and Norway, Iceland, and Ukraine, are participating. The first group of pilot projects started on 1 April 2023. A second phase will begin later in 2025. If you don't comply you won't have access to bank loans or accounts as well as most other services in the public and private sectors

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-strategic-partnership-to-unlock-billions-and-boost-military-ai-and-innovation New strategic partnership to unlock billions and boost military AI and innovation The UK will be at the leading edge of defence innovation as the government signs a new partnership with Palantir to unlock billions in investment and deliver on the Government’s Plan for Change. New strategic partnership with Palantir to unlock up to £1.5bn investment into the UK to deliver new jobs, growth and national security. Palantir announces plans to make the UK its European HQ for defence and create up to 350 new high-skilled jobs, cementing the UK as a state-of-the-art defence technology hub. Palantir and UK military to develop AI-powered capabilities already tested in Ukraine to speed up decision making, military planning and targeting.