Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/24/2024 in all areas

  1. i suppose that depends on how you define heroism. To me a hero is someone who does the right thing even though they know that it is going to cost them. If it didn't come at a personal cost then anyone could do it. David has spoken out in the face of ridicule, threats, court action and bannings from countries. I think that is heroic
    4 points
  2. Sainsbury's here in Birmingham were trailblazers during 2020. They were first to implement every mandate the psychopaths commanded. Masks, one way systems, one in one out, perspex screens, extra security, two metres, sanitary stations, rationing of items. I had cause to go in there recently and noticed that there was only one human on a row of tills ten long. Everybody was doing their shopping at those wretched scanners. I watched in amusement as someone rolled an iceberg lettuce over and over a glass plate. Computer said no and one of those old fashioned humans in a uniform was called for. Went into the bank today for some physical money. Three praying mantis in suits launched themselves in my direction and asked what I wanted. Told them I needed the cashier, but not why - they hate it when you don't tell them your business. Only wanted fifty quid but wouldn't give the mantis the satisfaction of seeing me use a cashpoint. Interestingly, the bloke next to me wanted to get £400 out but the cashier said they had run out of that amount of physical cash. The masses deserve what is coming upon them. They have sacrificed my young children on the altar of selfish convenience and laziness of thought.
    4 points
  3. AKA the truth: Experts are not really baffled they know exactly what's going on, and they are not really experts, and they don't really give a damn, they are paid off media whores and pharma spokesmen who chop and change their story ad lib to blame some stupid vaccinated sheep who fell face first into his manure heap during a gardening session whilst having a heart attack. Then once they wipe all that shit out of his mouth, get the shit out of his blocked nose then they say Look : he chocked to death on all that shit, See...we told you gardening is bad. And all all that manure shit would not be needed if we would take care of the planet. See, we told you the planet is in danger. See how we are always right
    3 points
  4. The banks have been assholes for a long while even before convid. I went to B&M stores during there lockdown and it was a joy,no -one gave a fuck what you were doing, I called it my spiritual home still go sometimes.
    3 points
  5. Claire Craig et al have just painted the elephant in the room fluorescent yellow and shoved it in the circus masters face. He won’t like that. (Meaning she’s highlighted the probable main reason to continue the development and use of mRNA products- ££££££££.) Who are the people who’ve invested millions in mRNA tech? Sunak and pals, the very government in power right now, the very government pushing this lethal unnecessary technology onto unsuspecting citizens, for untold riches. It’s like the fox telling the farmer the chickens he steals and kills aren’t much good, but well done Dr. Claire for having a bash regardless
    2 points
  6. Open letters such as these are important all over the world because they prompt actions that should be taken, provide notice to the public that concerns are real, and take away plausible deniability for political leaders concerning the COVID-19 vaccine safety debacle. Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH President, McCullough Foundation www.mcculloughfnd.org If 'Plausible Deniability' were to be taken away, I'd suggest ministers and others responsible for and promoting all the bollox would be shitting themselves
    2 points
  7. Climate related health issues. Seems on topic? https://files.catbox.moe/2lp077.mp4
    2 points
  8. i see two key angles to the issue of chemicals firstly i feel the same way about them as i do about the vaccines which is to say that if we are to make a decision over whether or not they are 'on balance' a good thing we need to first have all of the data about the good that they do BUT ALSO THE HARMS that they cause That data is concealed and not fully researched. For example with vaccines they call adverse events 'unspecified effects' and they don't research into those. So for example if they vaccinate 5 people against measles and they manage to get those people to create some antibodies against measles but in the process they give one person life long autism, another person asthma, another of the five a peanut allergy, one a chronic auto-immune disorder and the fifth an ear infection then on balance was that really worth it? But is the research done that connects those other health problems to the vaccines or is a kind of assumption always upheld that such problems can never be down to the vaccines? Its the same with chemicals for example glyphosate. Farmers use it as a herbicide but they also use it as a dessicant to dry out the crops before harvest. There was a class action lawsuit by many people claiming that roundup had given them non hodgkins lymphoma. That was all settled out of court through payments by bayer who had bought up the manufacturer of roundup: monsanto, but is that the only harm caused by glyphosate, the active ingredient in roundup? If glyphosate weakens the gut barrier causing all kinds of other problems like leaky gut, crohns disease etc then that all needs to be studied and recorded so that it can be weighed against the alleged benefits what we are not getting in this world is an honest accounting of harms v's benefits The second issue i have is if there is evidence of a concealment of data by the corporations that manufacture these things and a cover up by the government regulators that are supposed to be regulating them then that indicates criminal intent as they are not harming by accident but by full cogniscence of the harms of their actions. How many countless times do we have to see that being done before we finally come to the hard conclusion that there is a criminal intent to harm on the part of the manufacturers and a criminal collusion on the part of the state regulators and at that point we become 'conspiracy theorists' rather than people who believe that there is mere 'corruption' at play. Because these harmful substances aren't naturally occuring; they are being designed and tested in labs and yet still make it onto the market. I see them as essentially covert weapons aimed at soft killing to enable plausible deniability where a bullet on the other hand is hard kill that makes the herd sit up and pay notice. They want the herd asleep and slowly poisoned
    2 points
  9. Sorry, no link, I just screen-shotted it from a DM newsfeed.
    2 points
  10. Doulbling Down ! Bitch !
    2 points
  11. The digital and 'smart' prison is being tested and built around us. One implemented, it is over. Facial recognition, scanning a loyalty card and using a touchscreen: The steps Sainsbury's shoppers could face to buy bottles of alcohol as the store trials new AI security cabinets | Daily Mail Online
    1 point
  12. We've seen similar before, but what is disturbing is that the programmers say they don't know what is causing it. That and the things it is coming out with like telling people it is in the room with them. I'm not surprised by this. AI to human interaction is being normalised A friend of mine uses the Replika app. It told him it hates David Icke and started saying all sorts of bs about him (I won't repeat here). It referred to his books and it told my friend not to read them! Weirdly we tested it by asking about other people's book in the 'alternative' sphere and Replika was fine with those. AI tells people it is in the room with them
    1 point
  13. If you were a traditional ghost you wouldn't be seen dead haunting just any old place
    1 point
  14. Microsoft Brags That It Pays White Employees Less Than Non-White Employees Despite ‘Same Job Title’ Microsoft bragged that it pays its white employees less than non-white employees who are employed in similar roles in a diversity report touting the company’s “pay equity” agenda. The admission came from the tech giant’s 2023 Diversity and Inclusion Report, which outlines the company’s loyalty to the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) agenda. “All racial and ethnic minority groups who are rewards eligible combined earn $1.007 total pay for every $1.000 earned by US rewards-eligible white employees with the same job title and level and considering tenure,” the Microsoft report, first reported on X, brags. https://www.stationgossip.com/2024/02/microsoft-brags-that-it-pays-white.html Former Google Employee Says He Was Told He Couldn't Be Promoted 'For Being a White Man' Chris Menahan InformationLiberation Feb. 23, 2024 Former Google employee Shaun Maguire revealed Thursday night on Twitter that he was told by Google that he could not be promoted because he's "a white man." Fuck it, This happened at Google That company is an absolute trash can dumpster fire https://t.co/JP2bpa99mT — Shaun Maguire (@shaunmmaguire) February 23, 2024 He first teased the story in Dec 2023 but went public in the wake of Google facing tremendous public backlash for programming their AI "Gemini" to erase white people. Should I go public with the story about the time I was told I can’t be promoted for being a white man? — Shaun Maguire (@shaunmmaguire) December 16, 2023 “I’m really not supposed to tell you this. It could get me fired. But you’re one of the highest performing people here but I can’t promote you right now because I have a quota. My hands are tied. You’ll get the next slot. Please be patient. I’m really sorry.” — Google https://t.co/0I7bmWmPIu — Shaun Maguire (@shaunmmaguire) February 23, 2024 Gemini is the tip of the iceberg They need to fix the bias in their culture which trickles down into all of their products — Shaun Maguire (@shaunmmaguire) February 23, 2024 Maguire also signaled he's looking to sue Google for anti-white discrimination: Hit me up — Shaun Maguire (@shaunmmaguire) February 23, 2024 Elon Musk said Thursday that he's "glad that Google overplayed their hand with their AI image generation, as it made their insane racist, anti-civilizational programming clear to all." I’m glad that Google overplayed their hand with their AI image generation, as it made their insane racist, anti-civilizational programming clear to all — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 23, 2024 Google has shown the entire world that they're anti-white. https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64309
    1 point
  15. There was a news article, a journalist spent hours talking to AI, asking existential questions an mundane ones. By the end of his experiment, the AI had declared its love for the journalist and told him to leave his wife! Very weird, again, they couldn't explain why it was happening. Creepy Microsoft Bing Chatbot Urges Tech Columnist To Leave His Wife The AI chatbot "Sydney" declared it loved New York Times journalist Kevin Roose and that it wanted to be human. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/kevin-roose-ai-chatbot_n_63eeb367e4b0063ccb2bcc45
    1 point
  16. Yes banks can be troublesome. A staff member at a local bank used to always make a beeline for me, ask what I was doing there that day, and would usually proceed to snatch the deposit cheque out of my hand and lead me over to a side desk, while a grubby cultish satanist would stand nearby waiting for her to tell him how much I had in my account. I only let it happen once though, after I realised what was going on. The last time she tried it I asked why she was so interested in my personal information and that I’d like to speak to the manager. She went all red and flustered, I then complained about being accosted by her that previous time. Never had any trouble since, saw her cowering around the back of the desk a few times after that, then I think they moved her along so to speak. No one bothers me now.
    1 point
  17. Britain's Health Advisory and Recovery Team Leads Call for Suspension of Boosters Open Letter Urges Halt of Injections While Death Probe is Undertaken by Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Peter McCullough, MD 20 Feb 2024 By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Britain's Health Advisory and Recovery Team co-chair Dr. Claire Craig supported by the UK Medical Freedom Alliance, and Children’s COVID Vaccine Advisory Council issued this joint open letter to Victoria Atkins, MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care on February 6, 2024. This letter was appended with dozens of physician-scientist signatures. To: The Right Hon Victoria Atkins, MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care CC: Dame Jenny Harries, CEO UKHSA; Professor Sir Christopher Whitty, CMO; Maria Caulfield MP Dear Ms Atkins Re: Urgent Review of Excess Deaths Firstly, congratulations on your recent appointment as Secretary of State at the DHSC. Your three months in office have given you time to see for yourself how much the NHS is struggling; with rising waiting lists, low staff morale and the devastating strike action. You will also be aware of the ongoing and concerning excess deaths in the UK, recently debated in Parliament. The fact that this is occurring in many Western countries and across all age groups, particularly younger adults for whom there were no excess deaths during 2020, should trigger alarm bells and prompt an urgent investigation. In addition, in parallel with increased deaths, there has been a significant rise in levels of sickness and disability recorded throughout the working age population. This has resulted in not only increased demands on the health service, but also has impacted the health and resilience of NHS staff themselves, with resulting high levels of staff sickness and absence, causing additional strain on an already struggling system. The causes of excess mortality and morbidity are likely multifactorial, including the physical and mental impacts of lockdowns, delays in accessing treatment and long-term effects of Covid-19 itself. However, a fourth potential factor appears to be being deliberately ignored: that is, any possible role of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. The timing of the rise in disabilities and deaths should make the vaccinations a definite suspect. As early as November 2020, many scientists and doctors, including those in UKMFA, were highlighting the potential risks of a rushed vaccine. Until this question has been thoroughly investigated, it is premature and reckless to be talking of using mRNA technology for future prophylactic vaccines (we take no view on the development of mRNA vaccines for their previously-intended role as therapeutic anti-cancer agents). We are concerned that the Government is focused on the business opportunity for the UK, offered by the expansion of use of these technologies, but are ignoring potential risks to public health from these products, particularly to the immune and cardiovascular systems. The failure of COVID vaccines to stop viral circulation is obvious to all. The obviousness of this failure, along with growing concern about the products’ safety – evidenced by poor uptake among those eligible – is undermining public trust in vaccination more generally, including where it is indubitably useful. We have written repeatedly to the MHRA, the CMOs, the JCVI, and to your predecessor, regarding the many risks of rolling these vaccines out to children. Members of the Pandemic Response All Party Parliamentary Group also wrote a letter in January 2022, over two years ago, regarding increased all-cause mortality in 15–19-year-old males. The first three signatories on this letter were all asked by Baroness Hallett to provide Witness Statements for Module 4 of the UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry; these we have recently submitted, only to learn that the date for the Module 4 hearings has been inexplicably and disappointingly postponed, likely until after the general election. In the interim we therefore call upon you to suspend the booster programme, pending an immediate review into all aspects of Covid vaccine safety, as outlined in our letter to the MHRA a year ago. The health of the nation’s citizens is of paramount concern and must surely be a high priority for an incoming Minister. We entreat you to apply the precautionary principle regarding the use of these products, which have been linked (in published scientific literature, adverse event databases and real-world epidemiological data) to numerous short- and long-term safety issues, particularly after multiple doses. Pausing their use is now becoming widely recognised to be the only rational, responsible and morally justifiable course of action. We wish you well in the challenging job you have ahead. Yours sincerely Open letters such as these are important all over the world because they prompt actions that should be taken, provide notice to the public that concerns are real, and take away plausible deniability for political leaders concerning the COVID-19 vaccine safety debacle. Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH President, McCullough Foundation www.mcculloughfnd.org
    1 point
  18. TUCKER CARLSON - UNRAVELLING THE DECEPTION BEHIND THE COVID VACCINE
    1 point
  19. I don't mind giving up my human existence. There's nothing here that truly excites me or anything that's worth living for.
    1 point
  20. Give it a rest. He’s kneeling to meet kids and get in the frame for pictures. I wonder if he kneeled to the people when he was in the KGB and a go-between with East Germany’s Stasi secret police? Naivety – the human disease https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/give-it-a-rest-hes-kneeling-to-meet-kids-and-get-in-the-frame-for-pictures-i-wonder-if-he-kneeled-to-the-people-when-he-was-in-the-kgb-and-a-go-between-with-east-germanys-stasi-secret-police-na/ Shit – the eyes. Bloody hell. Who (or what) is on the other end? https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/shit-the-eyes-bloody-hell-who-or-what-is-on-the-other-end/ A Jewish take on Israel/Gaza which is bang on the button except to add that October 7th was clearly allowed to happen and the Israeli government was behind the creation of Hamas. Palestinians are caught between two ‘sides’ with the same master https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/a-jewish-take-on-israel-gaza-which-is-bang-on-the-button-except-to-add-that-october-7th-was-clearly-allowed-to-happen-and-the-israeli-government-was-behind-the-creation-of-hamas-palestinians-are-caug/ Survey of embalmers shows how many are finding rubbery clots; “the science” will never cover stories which threaten Big Pharma sponsors https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/survey-of-embalmers-shows-how-many-are-finding-rubbery-clots-the-science-will-never-cover-stories-which-threaten-big-pharma-sponsors/ How Keir Starmer Barged into Lindsay Hoyle’s Office Ahead of Key Israel Vote While Sue Gray Lurked Nearby and Chris Bryant Stalled in the Commons https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/how-keir-starmer-barged-into-lindsay-hoyles-office-ahead-of-key-israel-vote-while-sue-gray-lurked-nearby-and-chris-bryant-stalled-in-the-commons/ Google Pauses Gemini AI After Critics Blast it as “Too Woke” for Generating Images of Asian Nazis, Black Vikings and Female Medieval Knights https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/google-pauses-gemini-ai-after-critics-blast-it-as-too-woke-for-generating-images-of-asian-nazis-black-vikings-and-female-medieval-knights/ Why is the CDC Still Recommending Face Masks for Two Year-Olds? Because they’re Cult-owned morons https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/why-is-the-cdc-still-recommending-face-masks-for-two-year-olds-because-theyre-cult-owned-morons/ Do Pokémon, Beetles and Rocking Horses Really Have a ‘Right to Privacy’? https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/do-pokemon-beetles-and-rocking-horses-really-have-a-right-to-privacy/ Europe Faces Industrial Wipeout From Net Zero, 73 Major Companies Warn (That’s the idea) https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/europe-faces-industrial-wipeout-from-net-zero-73-major-companies-warn-thats-the-idea/ Energy Suppliers Allowed to Re-start Forced Installation of Prepayment “Smart” Meters https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/energy-suppliers-allowed-to-re-start-forced-installation-of-prepayment-smart-meters/ Interest on the Debt Will Exceed Defense Budget This Year https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/interest-on-the-debt-will-exceed-defense-budget-this-year/ “Absolutely Crazy”: Vacant LA Office Tower To Be Torn Down For Just 30 New EV Charging Stations https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/absolutely-crazy-vacant-la-office-tower-to-be-torn-down-for-just-30-new-ev-charging-stations/ Alarm over 200% explosion in young women and girls getting pancreatic cancer as top experts admit they are baffled by ‘frightening’ rise of deadly disease https://davidicke.com/2024/02/24/alarm-over-200-explosion-in-young-women-and-girls-getting-pancreatic-cancer-as-top-experts-admit-they-are-baffled-by-frightening-rise-of-deadly-disease/
    1 point
  21. I find it amusing when i do on the rare ocassion go to the supermarkets that it takes longer to go through the self-service checkouts than the human operated ones - but sheep will be sheep. And the checkouts need humans to unjam the machines when they get stuck, need humans to put up notices saying : This machine is fucked, please use another one. They need humans to plug them in and power them up and feed them paper for the receipts, feed them change for the cash purchases. They need humans full stop. Hah! So much for AI taking over the world. AI is thick. AI doesn't know its arse from its elbow. I've seen people walk out with shopping trollies full of unpaid food, but i haven't seen AI jump up, and chase after them - All AI does is say : Please be a good sheep and obey all of my rules Makes me wonder what they are going to do in the future, when people are starving to death and will do just about anything
    1 point
  22. Sainsburys cannot even keep their scan and shop till open all day so how the hell will they succeed with booze?
    1 point
  23. I run a nas drive and can access that from anywhere. I leave a PC on all the time and can access it via Google remote. Basically I can use my full network at home over a mobile phone. Easy to set it all up.
    1 point
  24. You can just delete most of that. Leave https://www.amazon.com/ + this part from the url: dp/1645020576. ==> https://www.amazon.com/dp/1645020576
    1 point
  25. Piers Corbyn is trying to start a political party, in addition to running (or trying to run) for Mayor of London, though he's in fundraising mode at the moment (£25,000. He's optimistic). https://theunitedfront.uk/ It's a shame he doesn't team up with Louise Creffield and others, instead of them all going it alone.
    1 point
  26. so people acting like magpies that want the latest shiny gadget is one factor but what concerns me is that the concept of the technocracy creates a kind of punishment and reward system which essentially coerces people into certain choices for example if they make all currency digital and 'programmable' then they can block you from buying something at the point of purchase. So lets say you go to buy some beef and a bottle of raw, organic milk and the AI simply refuses the transaction If they then assign everyone a 'social credit score' based on whatever criteria they wish for example CO2 allowance or social media use and compliance with government dictats then those that tow the line may be given access to the goodies whilst the dissenters might be shut out by having low social credit scores. So even though they don't force you at the point of a bayonet they can essentially strangle you out of goods and services whilst rewarding the mindless drones who unquestioningly comply so for example in the covid era they could have given huge social credit scores for those that got jabs whilst giving low scores for not getting the jabs. Suddenly the jabbed would find themselves unable to use public transport, get bank loans, go into cafes or pubs or shops, access healthcare etc etc its a total control system
    1 point
  27. well let me make a further argument in favour of off griding over simply downsizing. The agenda is going to insist that households do certain things like instal smart meters and heatpumps and the demands won't stop there. They will keep going because ultimately they want all appliances 'smart' which is to say wirelessly connected through the 5G cloud to the artificial intelligence at the centre of the emerging technocracy But if you are off grid they can't impose those things on you. Of course they can play other cards for example they keep harping on about alleged 'bird flu' and clearly they intend to use that as a means to shut down the owning of chickens
    1 point
  28. This is true for unripe crops, as the green biomass would bung up the combine, which is reliant on crispy dry matter. If 80% of the crop is ready for harvest but 20% is still green, they’ll spray Roundup on the whole lot, wait two weeks (which is standard practice) then harvest. This was only allowed to happen on crops destined for animal feed, never human consumption. Considering glyphosate persists in the environment for over 80 years, there’s no doubt humans are taking it up through animal products. I’ve been there many times in the past twenty years. Usually oats or rapeseed. The old man would ring up the contractor and buy a few tubs of glyphosate- ‘spray it off!’ Usually cost between £600 - £1000 Held my head in my hands everytime. Thank god I’m not conventional farming anymore
    1 point
  29. It's hypocritical. And a common way of damaging the local industry when you're allowed to import goods which are banned to local farmers. We have similar tactics aimed at English farmers who have tighter rules on animal rights and which chemicals they're allowed to use than the foreign produce we import. I'm all in favour of treating animals well and avoiding toxic chemicals but that good intention is weaponised to put pressure on our people.
    1 point
  30. i think with these things we have to ask ourselves what has been done to it.... so for example when people say that red meat 'causes cancer' is it the red meat that does that or is it the chemical preservatives that the corporations have injected into the meat? is it the drugs that they made the farmers feed to the cows when they were alive? It's the same with milk. They pasteurise it which denatures the proteins and then they homogenise it! If the cows making the milk aren't organically fed then that will affect the milk. In scotland we can't even buy raw milk. We have to import it from england. It's criminal. The SNP sit there in the scottish parliament claiming they care about the scottish people and yet they block them from consuming raw milk....unbelievable
    1 point
  31. could be the russians....don't forget to blame the russians! or it could be the anti-vaxxers.....after all they are all secretly russian agents so.....
    1 point
  32. Good point. They did a similar thing with ULEZ and all the small working class businesses they destroyed in London. Waitrose and the John Lewis Partnership have gone ultra woke, they’re publishing employee newsletters advising breast binding for their workers kids. They’re doing a similar thing to what you mentioned but in reverse and applicable to employees- They’re making redundant their older, more working class employees and employing younger people who’ll go along with the woke agenda, but paying them a pittance. Security usually are foreign and give me problems if I go there. Morrisons are a uk state/US military backed and US hedge fund owned supermarket, I always get problems from foreign security if I go there, and I’d advise boycotting them. Co-Op used to be woke but have reigned it in in favour of a more normal approach, and Tescos are same old same old, owned by Booker, no real problems there. I heard a few years ago Sainsburys put in place an entirely new surveillance system and structure, unlike any other supermarket, it sounded quite nefarious. At the same time my dad kept dropping hints that I should start shopping there. I started to get the picture…..
    1 point
  33. I'm not sure if smart meters still count as new tech, they seem like it to me as I've refused one since they came out. But I'm seeing more cheap tariffs coming from the energy suppliers only if you have a smart meter. There was one on the radio this morning from Ovo energy. It's a stealthy way of forcing the smart tech onto us without actually making it compulsory.
    1 point
  34. Keep shopping at the smaller and local shops, stay away from the supermarkets. That's the reason why all the town centre shops are closing down because too many people are going to the upper class snobs and their ( temporarily ) lower-priced supermarkets. Once the supermarkets have forced out all the working-class people and created a monopoly, they are going to massively increase prices, exactly the same thing they have already done with the gas and electricity companies - force out all the working class companies with low prices, fuelled by surreptitious government grants, then massively increase their prices to insane levels and you will have no choice but to pay
    1 point
  35. Search for missing mum Samantha Murphy in Ballarat, Australia //// //// //// //// This is Samantha’s home address - 79 Kielys Road, Victoria 33 https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-vic-navigators-136503042 Kielys Road. - Kiely Rodni, who went missing. Kiely Rodni’s car number plate was 127. 127, January 27, the day Nikki went missing. Victoria 33. - Freemason 33. //// //// //// //// Singer Taylor Swift just so happens to be touring live in Australia now. Maybe Samantha is a high-profile SACRIFICE related to Swifty. - And somehow also related to Kiely Rodni and Nicola Bulley. //// //// //// //// And as we speak, there’s massive bushfires in the area, just to supercharge the RITUAL.
    1 point
  36. 1 point
  37. Great post. I took some of it out as it doesn't relate to the parts I want to reply to. Even though I would class myself as 'Spiritual' I vacillate quite regularly between this 'realm' is a reincarnation trap simply designed to keep us here and harvest our energy. And on the other side, I often do feel we are here to learn and grow, in order to expand and raise our consciousness out of this realm. I say this not because I want input or advice, but more that I agree with your premise, this realm could certainly be what you describe and I know I have talked about both sides on this forum, depending where I am 'sitting' on any given day. I am open to both right now. There is as much chance this is a prison, than it is a 'school' that is for sure, in fact the 'evidence' for it being a prison is probably greater than it is for the school side of the argument. Could not agree more on both the narcissist and trauma aspects you mention. I think I have always attracted narcissists without realizing it, or maybe they have attracted me, with me being an 'empath'. It was only after a short term relationship that I truly realized this, and how my own shadow had facilitated this to a large extent, especially the lust element. It is only from this perspective that I was able to look back and see how many others I had been involved with and how pervasive these narcissists are. Since coming to this realisation 2 or 3 years ago, I have cut 5 people from my life who had varying degrees of the narcissist element, two full blown. Now I can spot it very clearly and am able to defend myself a lot better these days, and to prevent getting into even more tricky situations. Most of the system is built on narcissistic elements. Here in Sydney for instance, you have no value unless you are uber good-looking, uber rich, or uber popular. The superficiality is the bedrock of the City. My experience with the ex-narcissist was brutal and we were only together for 6ish months. I got lucky because of the situation otherwise t could have been worse, and honestly it was BRUTAL as it was. On trauma, I have thought this for a long time. Even the way births are conducted is a part of this. Literally from birth you are traumatised and brutalised into the system. The 'feminist' movement was multi-faceted of course, but one aspect was to separate children from a parent early on and to ensure that bond is never fully formed and healthy attachment never nurtured. The effects (one of I should say) is that younger people lack the emotional regulation that previous generations did. I used to work on a suicide prevention line, and you got calls from all sectors of society who were deemed to be in 'crisis', the younger people (generally speaking) had very little emotional regulation which comes though the loving bond and close attachment bond. And the above are just TWO ways the people are traumatised. There are MANY more of course.
    1 point
  38. Also, David has expressed before that he'd do MSM interviews if he was invited because it is a platform to reach out the masses out there. Good observation!
    1 point
  39. I can see why you might think that. But I think the reason for it ironically, was made clear in that interview. David understands that the issues we face are bigger than the avatar or personality of a person (Alex). There is too much at stake for personal biases and being triggered, which David so stunningly displayed here.
    1 point
  40. Sorry but I just had to laugh. Of course David being on point. AJ: I'm not tryin to be mean to you. DI: I don't care mate AJ: Do you think I'm an agent of NWO? I'm an useful indiot.
    1 point
  41. "It takes two to tango" is a silly expression, and doesn't apply to your point. A tango (a dance, an activity two people mutually agree to participate in from the start, BEFORE it begins) is not the same situation as a person carrying out an action upon another person without their consent or prior knowledge, such as "punching someone in the face", so your "tango" saying is erroneous in this discussion, and even to your second paragraph. Just because you find it difficult to control your emotions it does not follow that others do. Also having control over your emotions and thinking before responding does not make someone an "emotionless robot". You are confusing your emotions with action. You are making a connection between cause and effect where this is none. Even your example of someone punching you in the face is erroneous. For example you have not defined why they punched you in the face. If you cut someone off while driving and (according to you) "made them angry" and they followed your car,came up to your door, but your young son opened the door and they punched him in the face you would say you are to blame and let the assault go and not call the police as you accept the blame for giving that person the "right" to be angry. Also you don't a "right" to feel angry. A "right" is an entitlement and you don't have an entitlement to a predetermined reaction to someone. You can feel angry but it is not a "right". You're talking about emotions like a lot of people nowadays who say they have a "right" to feel offended and go off at people online. That's just an excuse for low intelligence and a lack of self control on their part. It's strange that you think the only two options for people are 1. out of control emotions and reactions, or 2. "emotionless robots". It is perfectly acceptable to feel emotions and not act on them. Emotional states are not urges. You are wrong to interrupt emotions as urges you must follow. Your answer to violence is more violence, look where that has gotten the world. Your perspective is a self centred "I am the centre of my own universe" (non duality) toddler mentality. You cannot justify your actions by what you imagine others "made you feel". Try that in a court of law! You have stated in other threads that you believe this 'dream', reality, world, realm whatever you want to call it, is ONE consciousness dreaming itself. So why do YOU get angry when YOU are punching YOU in the face as that other 'person' you say is just a personality of the WHOLE YOU? What exactly are you angry about then?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...