Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 02/05/2024 in all areas

  1. The list for excuses in the media for sudden death and heart problems has been growing more and did I miss any? covid/long covid goes without saying. Causes for sudden death or heart attack: Any physical activity sudden death, plowing snow, taking paracetamol, moving clocks forward an hour, skipping breakfast, weather, being a football fan, pandemic stress poor diet, cannabis use, referee whistles, fizzy drinks cause stroke, Flu, rising bills, climate change changing babies more chance of heart problems, ukraine invasion, being sarcastic, napping, artificial light during sleep, extra serving of red meat linked to big rise in heart disease risk, over thinking poisons the brain, extreme weather rise in heart disease, video games, tennis practice, tiny particles in the air causes heart attack, breathing too many times per day, stress from christmas holidays and change in schedule, compound found in eggs linked to an enhanced risk of blood clotting, soil, air pollution leads to irregular heart beat, gardening (as activity), hot weather causes breathing problems, taking a shower, common cold causes blood clot, being too happy cause heart attack,
    11 points
  2. How many times are you going to repeat this opinion? We keep asking when are people going to wake up' and when one does (who happens to be in the media) we accuse them of 'jumping on the bandwagon'. Many millions of people have woken up from this scam, many are on here, why should we expect that nobody in the media would also wake up? Just because he isn't awake to it all, does not mean he is a shill, it is a gradual process. I am sure many of us who woke up, had to slowly let go of old beliefs that are often operating on surface levels but also very deep levels.
    9 points
  3. I was recently re-watching some old clips about geoengineering which i have shared online many times over the years. I just felt a pull to the information. one of the clips was of the climate scientist david keith being interviewed on the BBC 'hardtalks' programme, years ago and after i watched it i clicked on keith's wikipedia page to see what the guy is now upto as i haven't heard anything from him for years. I was reading through the page when something caught my eye. There was a bit about how him and his team had been considering what substances could be sprayed as particulates in the atmosphere to reflect the sunlight, allegedly to combat 'climate change' and i noticed that they had been considering spraying dust made up of ground up diamonds. This jumped out at me for two reasons. First of all because despite having read a lot about geoengineering over the years i don't recall anyone ever mentioning diamond dust. The usual substances people claim are being dropped on them are: aluminium, barium and strontium. So that was odd. But secondly i know that israel is central to the global diamond trade and that de beers diamond mining company had been created through rothschild money. So i did an online search and found an article in a science website about how a team at harvard (where keith worked) had discussed the idea of spraying diamond dust into the atmosphere and that they were being funded by bill gates but i couldn't really find anything else about this. This sounded really dodgy to me because i know that diamonds are extremely hard and crystaline and that surely inhaling powdered diamonds would be extremely harmful so i did a search to see if there were any known ill effects from inhaling diamond dust and i found an article about a condition called diamemia which can be caused by inhaling diamond dust and which afflicts some people who work in the diamond trade cutting and polishing diamonds. Well blow me down when it said in that article that diamemia can cause blood clots, cardiovascular issues and respiratory issues as those are all the conditions being associated with 'covid' and with the jabs for the alleged 'covid'. This got me thinking about whether some of the 'graphene' that some researchers are saying they have seen under spectroscopes, in peoples blood, is in fact diamond dust as graphene is also carbon and can turn into diamond under pressure. Then within days of me posting about this in my 'pirates republic thread' i saw an article on an indie media website saying that there is an israeli geoengineering company that wants to spray particulates into the atmosphere and its called 'stardust solutions'. Stardust is apparently made out of diamonds and israel just happens to be the centre of the worlds diamond trade. Suddenly more than a few dots were joining up. Now i don't have anything concrete about all of this yet but i wanted to put this out there to people so that they can also keep an eye on this and be vigilant. I also know that israeli planes have been flying into UK airports though this has been supposed to have been related to the movement of weapons to israel due to the gaza genocide. I just feel there is something to all of this and wanted to raise the alarm: diamond dust
    9 points
  4. Don't forget: From George Orwell's book "1984" "The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself. The process should be automatic, instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak. . . . He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He presented himself with propositions—'the Party says the Earth is flat', 'the Party says that ice is heavier than water'—and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them." "Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity." Also see: Zersetzung "Zersetzung (pronounced [t͡sɛɐ̯ˈzɛt͡sʊŋ] ⓘ, German for "decomposition" and "disruption") was a psychological warfare technique used by the Ministry for State Security (Stasi) to repress political opponents in East Germany during the 1970s and 1980s. Zersetzung served to combat alleged and actual dissidents through covert means, using secret methods of abusive control and psychological manipulation to prevent anti-government activities. People were commonly targeted on a pre-emptive and preventive basis, to limit or stop activities of dissent that they may have gone on to perform, and not on the basis of crimes they had actually committed. Zersetzung methods were designed to break down, undermine, and paralyze people behind "a facade of social normality"[1] in a form of "silent repression". "... a method of operation by the Ministry for State Security for an efficacious struggle against subversive activities, particularly in the treatment of operations. With Zersetzung one can influence hostile and negative individuals across different operational political activities, especially the hostile and negative aspects of their dispositions and beliefs, so these are abandoned and changed little by little, and, if applicable, the contradictions and differences between the hostile and negative forces would be laid open, exploited, and reinforced. The goal of Zersetzung is the fragmentation, paralysis, disorganization, and isolation of the hostile and negative forces, in order to preventatively impede the hostile and negative activities, to largely restrict, or to totally avert them, and if applicable to prepare the ground for a political and ideological reestablishment. Zersetzung is equally an immediate constitutive element of "operational procedures" and other preventive activities to impede hostile gatherings. The principal force employed to implement Zersetzung are the unofficial collaborators. Zersetzung presupposes information and significant proof of hostile activities planned, prepared, and accomplished as well as anchor points corresponding to measures of Zersetzung. Zersetzung must be produced on the basis of a root cause analysis of the facts and the exact definition of a concrete goal. Zersetzung must be executed in a uniform and supervised manner; its results must be documented. The political explosive force of Zersetzung heightens demands regarding the maintenance of secrecy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zersetzung Of course wikipedia would like us to believe they don't do that anymore, after all, look! it's published right there!...if they were still doing it it would still be a "secret!"...yeah, right, sure... ps; "Germ Theory" is a big$$$$$$$$ pseudo-scientific Rockefeller scam. Table Of Iatrogenic Deaths In The United States (Deaths induced inadvertently by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures) Condition Deaths Cost Billion $s Author Adverse Drug Reactions 106,000 12 Lazarou (1) Suh (49) Medical error 98,000 2 IOM (6) Bedsores 115,000 55 Xakellis (7)Barczak (8) Infection 88,000 5 Weinstein (9)MMWR (10) Malnutrition 108,800 — Nurses Coalition (11) Outpatients 199,000 77 Starfield (12)Weingart (1, 12) Unnecessary Procedures 37,136 122 HCUP(3, 13) Surgery-Related 32,000 9 AHRQ(8,5) TOTAL 783,936 282 We could have an even higher death rate by using Dr. Lucien Leape's 1997 medical and drug error rate of 3 million. (14) Multiplied by the fatality rate of 14% (that Leape used in 1994 (16) we arrive at an annual death rate of 420,000 for drug errors and medical errors combined. If we put this number in place of Lazorou's 106,000 drug errors and the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) 98,000 medical errors, we could add another 216,000 deaths making a total of 999,936 deaths annually. ADR/med error 420,000 $200 billion Leape 1997(14) TOTAL 999,936 Annual Unnecessary Medical Events Unnecessary Events People Affected (Millions) Iatrogenic Events (Millions) Hospitalization 8.9 (4) 1.78 (16) Procedures 7.5 (3) 1.3 (40) TOTAL 16.4 3.08 The enumerating of unnecessary medical events is very important in our analysis. Any medical procedure that is invasive and not necessary must be considered as part of the larger iatrogenic picture. Unfortunately, cause and effect go unmonitored. The figures on unnecessary events represent people ("patients") who are thrust into a dangerous health care system. They are helpless victims. Each one of these 16.4 million lives is being affected in a way that could have a fatal consequence. Simply entering a hospital could result in the following (out of 16. 4 million people): 2.1% chance of a serious adverse drug reaction (186,000) (1) 5% to 6% chance of acquiring a nosocomial [hospital] infection (489,500) (9) 4% to 36% chance of having an iatrogenic injury in hospital (medical error and adverse drug reactions) (1.78 million) (16) 17% chance of a procedure error (1.3 million) (40) All the statistics above represent a one-year time span. Imagine the numbers over a 10-year period. Working with the most conservative figures from our statistics we project the following 10-year death rates. Medical Intervention Projected Ten-Year Death Rates Condition 10-Year Deaths Adverse Drug Reaction 1.06 million Medical error 0.98 million Bedsores 1.15 million Nosocomial Infection 0.88 million Malnutrition 1.09 million Outpatients 1.99 million Unnecessary Procedures 371,360 Surgery-related 320,000 TOTAL 7,841,360 (7.8 million) Our projected statistic of 7.8 million iatrogenic deaths is more than all the casualties from wars that America has fought in its entire history. Our projected figures for unnecessary medical events occurring over a 10-year period are also dramatic. Unnecessary Intervention Projected Ten-Year Statistics Unnecessary Events 10-Year Number Iatrogenic Events Hospitalization 89 million 17 million Procedures 75 million 13 million TOTAL 164 million 30 million These projected figures show that a total of 164 million people, approximately 56% of the population of the United States, have been treated unnecessarily by the medical industry — in other words, nearly 50,000 people per day. http://www.ourcivilisation.com/medicine/usamed/deaths.htm
    8 points
  5. “Stay home save lives” was a lie “We’re in this together” was a lie “Two weeks to slow the spread” was a lie “Masks help prevent the spread” was a lie “Super spreader events” was a lie “The vaccine is a dead end for Covid” was a lie “You’re not going to get Covid if you have these vaccines” was a lie “Breakthrough cases are rare” was a lie “The shot is 100% effective” was a lie “Only two shots to get your life back” was a lie “You just need to get the third one” was a lie “The fourth one offers the most protection” was a lie “A million people died of Covid” was a lie “Pandemic of the unvaccinated” was a lie “Winter of severe illness and death” was a lie “Nobody was forced to take it” is a lie “The vaccines saved millions” is a lie “Nobody is injured or dying from the shot” is a lie It’s all lies No amnesty No deals No escape Justice first!!!
    8 points
  6. https://x.com/Walkabout24/status/1764269645366755714?s=20 I can tell you who is not lining up for a heart check... the unvaccinated
    7 points
  7. I think Neil is genuine. Has just been somewhat behind us in awareness to all the bollox. Brand is a wanker, IMHO. All mouth and total lack of decorum. Is he funny ? Jeez, give me a break !
    7 points
  8. Worst thing about Covid was the nastiness of many people, their fascist notions and dangerous ideas. I was amazed at how easily people can change. And now we're dealing with a Mao/Marxist/American 'Woke' ideology aimed at western culture, men, Christianity and heterosexuality. They want a world revolution making us all 'Global Citizens', without rights but with responsibilities. Does no-one learn from history, or is it the promise of power and riches that blinds and tricks them every time.
    7 points
  9. OK, I’m posting some anecdotal information and looking for some responses to try and get a handle on what is going on here in the UK right now with regard to the general illness that seems to be going round my local area currently and over the winter period… I live and work in the North West UK and almost EVERYONE I know seems to have or had a persistent hacking cough and / or sore throat which seems to last at least a couple of weeks or more… it’s been particularly prevalent in the last month or so. Except that it isn’t everyone, I’m only seeing this in VACCINATED people. In the office I visit in Liverpool I am the only unvaccinated person and I seem to be the only person who doesn’t have it or hasn’t had it. One guy in the office has been coughing on and off since early November and can’t shift it. It’s quite unnerving that people just seem to be wandering round coughing and spluttering without questioning why and more unnervingly they are seemingly apathetic about doing anything about it. Surely if you’ve had a cough for 3 MONTHS that’s a cause for concern? Anyone else on here who can provide some feedback or correlation on this? Just trying to build up a picture as most of us on here would agree to the suggestion that the “vaccine” has deleted people’s immune systems to varying degrees, and I would suggest from the evidence that I am seeing that this is definitely the case. It’s like working amongst the walking dead at the moment.
    7 points
  10. Myself and others speculated when the jabs went public that the next chapter was written before the end of 2019. Russians, dirty bombs or what has become known as Disease X (maybe all three) will cover for gross excess deaths. They are on the verge of not being able to keep a lid on all the suddenlies, unexpectedlies and turbo cancers. When the deaths are exponential (quite probably sometime over the next two to three years) then we'll see carnage in the name of something else. Twenty million plus over such a short period of time will need a seriously big and nasty covering.
    7 points
  11. Governments were never in charge. They are simply the puppets of those who think they are "elite."
    7 points
  12. yes and if anyone tries to get in there like a cat amongst the pigeons to try and break people out of the groupthink those people will be banned we see rishi sunak and the deep state seeking to do the same by calling anyone who is against the genocide in gaza an 'islamic extremist' or calling anyone who questions mass unchecked immigration a 'far right extremist' or anyone who questions the covid jabs an 'anti-vaxxer, conspiracy theorist'. His family own infosys which is a key company in the developing technocracy. So he wants to cancel anyone who can expose what he and his fellow conspirators are upto They are desperate to hold the masses under their spell and that requires blocking out any information from sources outside of the dream (false perception of reality) that the masses are in
    6 points
  13. Just goes to prove that Andrew is RIGHT !
    6 points
  14. Sainsbury's here in Birmingham were trailblazers during 2020. They were first to implement every mandate the psychopaths commanded. Masks, one way systems, one in one out, perspex screens, extra security, two metres, sanitary stations, rationing of items. I had cause to go in there recently and noticed that there was only one human on a row of tills ten long. Everybody was doing their shopping at those wretched scanners. I watched in amusement as someone rolled an iceberg lettuce over and over a glass plate. Computer said no and one of those old fashioned humans in a uniform was called for. Went into the bank today for some physical money. Three praying mantis in suits launched themselves in my direction and asked what I wanted. Told them I needed the cashier, but not why - they hate it when you don't tell them your business. Only wanted fifty quid but wouldn't give the mantis the satisfaction of seeing me use a cashpoint. Interestingly, the bloke next to me wanted to get £400 out but the cashier said they had run out of that amount of physical cash. The masses deserve what is coming upon them. They have sacrificed my young children on the altar of selfish convenience and laziness of thought.
    6 points
  15. Doulbling Down ! Bitch !
    6 points
  16. That single word, all by itself, actually expresses an exceptionally high degree of one's emotions and feelings with extraordinary intent and clarity .... IMHO. Zero ambiguity Perhaps people should use it more often; especially considering the characters we often discuss or see here e.g. Mr Schwab, Wankock etc
    6 points
  17. https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/tragedy-angel-stoke-trent-schoolgirl-9099892?fbclid=IwAR3bW7Azg6A3pTXZNrqHORwOSSf8hEWBLKtajpa2nLrG49icK0KddHR1sn8 Surely any death of a 14 year old is suspicious.
    6 points
  18. No problem. Who'd risk getting a vaccinated jabbed "organ" anyway.
    6 points
  19. Oh my God, if a 'King' can get it, anyone can, how scarey is that? Remember when poor Bozzer the Prime Mincer at the time caught Convid and was 'seriously ill'? That was to drum the thought into our minds that 'if a leading politician could get it, so could anyone else' That scared me so much I never left the airing cupboard for three weeks and lived on after eight mints and cream crackers { they were the only things that my wife could slide under the door to me}
    6 points
  20. If you look at the language used here, rather than have the same knee jerk reaction, you'll see the guardian is still pushing the narrative of 'vax saves lives, government is good' So called "left" leaning news has to make it look like they are in opposition to the "right" who are currently in power. Govt flip flops constantly on both "sides"- that is the real control. It creates confusion in the populace, which manifests as inaction or apathy. Those who do bother to vote think they are changing things, when really its all orchestrated. hogwash 101.
    5 points
  21. Researchers study brain activity of surgeons for signs of cognitive overload bafflement
    5 points
  22. Just wondering if any other members have gone down the van conversion route? We've recently bought a 2011 Vauxhall Vivaro diesel van and are busy kitting it out as a campervan (of sorts!). It's a SWB model and doesn't have a hi-top, so space is limited, but adequate. I've made a pull-out double bed that slides back to form a seat. Also fitted a reversing camera, leisure battery on a split-charge system, and various other tweaks and comforts. The plan is to mainly do some wild camping in Scotland. My brother-in-law also owns a Vivaro and he and his wife travel regularly to the Berwick and North Berwick areas, where they park up overnight in pub car parks, or designated lay-bys. This has worked really well for them and is much less expensive (as in mostly FREE!) compared to staying on campsites. I'll not bore you with any more, unless this topic gains a bit of interest.
    5 points
  23. Mmmm tasty. Remember what David said in Children of the Matrix, about how the more vaccines you have, the safer you are from getting eaten by the reptilians, as vaccines poison their bodies? If that’s the case then the entire forum will be a sophisticated taster menu for the scaly ones. That’s about as pro vaccine as I’ll ever get
    5 points
  24. And aluminium is added to the tap water so most people ingest it daily. There was an incident in Camelford, Cornwall in 1988 when too much was added to the water supply. It was covered up for 16 days until the water company admitted it and locals were poisoned with short term and long term effects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelford_water_pollution_incident
    5 points
  25. I posted a previous thread concerning Kylie with the release of her latest album and the connectiontion to the occult now Shane Lynch former Boyzone 'star' claims in a local paper that Taylor Swift and other artists are performing satanic rituals on stage without the audience realising what is happening, see the following article in the Belfast Telegraph. https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/music/ex-boyzone-star-claims-taylor-swift-performs-satanic-rituals-in-front-of-fans/a863417240.html
    5 points
  26. Another thing too, it's not just the exposing that he does, it's also the thought processing he uses while going through it. His background as an electrical engineer is an asset, whereas in that field one needs to use genuine logic and cannot rely on guesses or try to fudge stuff, it's gotta be "right" or it won't work...and that could be a complete waste of time and money or even fatal, so one needs to "know" what is what, and how it works, both physically, in practice, and theoretically. So he's a kind of teacher too, and "they" don't want us to learn how he does it. If it was a fair fight, Richard D. Hall would mop up the floor with those clowns, and he could probably do it one-handed...I don't know about having both hands tied behind his back>>>>>but we already know he won no matter what. (whaaaa! Ellen!...Ellen!....ahhh! Ellen!!!.....bla, bla, bla...).
    5 points
  27. To sucker you in. To pretend they are aware and awake sympathisers, same as russell brand and neil oliver whom talk like a conspiracy theorist then suddenly brand started talking about needing a one world government and digital currency. Once he realised how unpopular his comnets were he quickly went back to being a conspiracy theorist like nothing had happened
    5 points
  28. i see two key angles to the issue of chemicals firstly i feel the same way about them as i do about the vaccines which is to say that if we are to make a decision over whether or not they are 'on balance' a good thing we need to first have all of the data about the good that they do BUT ALSO THE HARMS that they cause That data is concealed and not fully researched. For example with vaccines they call adverse events 'unspecified effects' and they don't research into those. So for example if they vaccinate 5 people against measles and they manage to get those people to create some antibodies against measles but in the process they give one person life long autism, another person asthma, another of the five a peanut allergy, one a chronic auto-immune disorder and the fifth an ear infection then on balance was that really worth it? But is the research done that connects those other health problems to the vaccines or is a kind of assumption always upheld that such problems can never be down to the vaccines? Its the same with chemicals for example glyphosate. Farmers use it as a herbicide but they also use it as a dessicant to dry out the crops before harvest. There was a class action lawsuit by many people claiming that roundup had given them non hodgkins lymphoma. That was all settled out of court through payments by bayer who had bought up the manufacturer of roundup: monsanto, but is that the only harm caused by glyphosate, the active ingredient in roundup? If glyphosate weakens the gut barrier causing all kinds of other problems like leaky gut, crohns disease etc then that all needs to be studied and recorded so that it can be weighed against the alleged benefits what we are not getting in this world is an honest accounting of harms v's benefits The second issue i have is if there is evidence of a concealment of data by the corporations that manufacture these things and a cover up by the government regulators that are supposed to be regulating them then that indicates criminal intent as they are not harming by accident but by full cogniscence of the harms of their actions. How many countless times do we have to see that being done before we finally come to the hard conclusion that there is a criminal intent to harm on the part of the manufacturers and a criminal collusion on the part of the state regulators and at that point we become 'conspiracy theorists' rather than people who believe that there is mere 'corruption' at play. Because these harmful substances aren't naturally occuring; they are being designed and tested in labs and yet still make it onto the market. I see them as essentially covert weapons aimed at soft killing to enable plausible deniability where a bullet on the other hand is hard kill that makes the herd sit up and pay notice. They want the herd asleep and slowly poisoned
    5 points
  29. i think with these things we have to ask ourselves what has been done to it.... so for example when people say that red meat 'causes cancer' is it the red meat that does that or is it the chemical preservatives that the corporations have injected into the meat? is it the drugs that they made the farmers feed to the cows when they were alive? It's the same with milk. They pasteurise it which denatures the proteins and then they homogenise it! If the cows making the milk aren't organically fed then that will affect the milk. In scotland we can't even buy raw milk. We have to import it from england. It's criminal. The SNP sit there in the scottish parliament claiming they care about the scottish people and yet they block them from consuming raw milk....unbelievable
    5 points
  30. Same here, in Serbia. The MSM calls it "the great cough". They try to portray is as something normal, something usual, but I have never heard that term before. Just today I spoke with a business associate, who I presume is vaxxed, I'm rather sure he is. Anyhow, all of a sudden, he got this cough that is so severe that he loses consciousness from coughing. He spent the night at the hospital, they couldn't figure out what is wrong with him. But it still happens, he starts coughing so bad that his brain shuts off. It's ridiculous.
    5 points
  31. 33M paycheque. Nice one master!
    5 points
  32. It is getting harder and harder for them to ignore now. At some point the dam will finally burst and they will have to talk about this in the media and then big G will have to respond. They probably have planned for this though and have a narrative already planned. The sheer numbers now are hard to ignore and even the sleeping are starting to mumble in their sleep 'something is wrong'.
    5 points
  33. You have to take the heart poison in order to be eligible for the heart transplant
    5 points
  34. They are all going to be shifting the blame to each other and going round and round and round. They know there is no one to stop them so round and round they will go. Nothing will actually ever happen so I am learning to enjoy the show.
    5 points
  35. lol! https://x.com/fisherlady111/status/1756749787137749312?s=46
    5 points
  36. what a wild interview that was! Thought David really skewered the agenda from about half an hour in where he explains how the takeover of twitter by musk and his rebranding as some sort of free speech advocate has lulled people into a false sense of security re musk so that now they believe that what they see on X is legit when in fact the algorithms can now control the content seen on X thereby allowing the cabal to create a new more controlled alternative-lite to kettle peoples perceptions so that they don't go any further down the rabbit hole In reality musk is upto his neck in agenda stuff whether it is firing satellites up to help build 'the cloud' or trying to interface humans with AI or advocating for the merger of humanity and AI. Musk is a total bond-style villain but now people think he's some sort of hero battling the elites....
    5 points
  37. Eyes are useless when the Spirit is blind!
    5 points
  38. Personally, the way I view it is that what we are witnessing is akin to a snake which has had its head cut off but the body is still twitching. This year will be pivotal in many ways. Their filth and slime is rising to the top and soon it will be undeniably laid bare for all to see. A growing number of us can already see it.
    5 points
  39. Reminds me of... (Rear Cover: Prodigy - Music for the Jilted Generation)
    5 points
×
×
  • Create New...