PDA

View Full Version : Iraq about Oil? You bet says head of Fed


john white
18-09-2007, 12:53 PM
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22428240-2703,00.html

War in Iraq all about the oil says Alan Greenspan

THE US's elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.

In his long-awaited memoir, to be published today, Mr Greenspan, a Republican whose 18-year tenure as head of the US Federal Reserve was widely admired, will also deliver a stinging critique of President George W. Bush's economic policies.

However, it is his view on the motive for the 2003 Iraq invasion that is likely to provoke the most controversy.

"I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil," he says.

Mr Greenspan, 81, is understood to believe that Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the security of oil supplies in the Middle East.

The Bush administration, along with its allies in government in Britain and Australia, has always insisted the war had nothing to do with oil.

According to Mr Bush, the aim was to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction and end Saddam's support for terrorism.

While his declaration that the prime US motive for the Iraq war was oil will set off a political storm, his onslaught against Republican fiscal mismanagement will cause another, just as the economy becomes a big issue in the primary election campaign.

Mr Greenspan's 531-page book will do little to restore faith in the Bush administration's claims of economic proficiency at a time when the markets are deeply unsettled.

He has harsh words for Mr Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney and the Republicans over their lack of financial discipline.

They are contrasted with former president Bill Clinton, whom Mr Greenspan clearly admires.

He writes that Mr Bush's failure to curb spending was "a major mistake" and Republican congressmen were "feeding at the trough".

"The Republicans in Congress lost their way," he says. "They swapped principle for power. They ended up with neither."He sums up his deep disappointment with Mr Bush: "My biggest frustration remained the President's unwillingness to wield his veto against out-of-control spending. Not exercising the veto power became a hallmark of the Bush presidency ... To my mind, Bush's collaborate-don't-confront approach was a major mistake."

In contrast, Mr Greenspan, an adviser to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown who describes his own politics as "lifelong libertarian Republican", called Mr Clinton's 1993 economic plan "an act of political courage".

When Mr Bush and Mr Cheney won the 2000 election, Mr Greenspan writes, "I thought we had a golden opportunity to advance the idealsof effective, fiscally conservative government and free markets ... I was soon to see my old friends veer off in unexpected directions."

He rejects the Republican mantra that "deficits don't matter" and says that in theBush-Cheney White House, "little value was placed on rigorous economic policy debate orthe weighing of long-term consequences".

Greenspan, who retired last year after serving six presidents either as chairman of the Fed or as an economic adviser, makes no secret of his admiration for Mr Clinton but believes he was undermined by the scandal of hisrelationship with Monica Lewinsky.

When the news first broke, Mr Greenspan discloses, "I was incredulous. 'There is no way these stories could be correct,' I told my friends. 'No way'."

Later, when the affair was confirmed, Mr Greenspan says: "I wondered how the president could take such a risk. It seemed so alien to the Bill Clinton I knew, and made me feel disappointed and sad."

He has sharp views on other presidents he has known, judging that there is something abnormal about anyone willing to undergo what it takes to get the job.

Gerald Ford, he writes, "was as close to normal as you get in a president, but he was neverelected".

The Watergate tapes, he says, show Richard Nixon as "an extremely smart man who is sadly paranoid, misanthropic andcynical".

He recalls telling a friend who had accused Nixon of anti-semitism that "he wasn't exclusively anti-semitic. He was anti-semitic, anti-Italian, anti-Greek, anti-Slovak. I don't know anybody he was pro."

Ronald Reagan's ability to joke and tell folksy anecdotes in support of a particular policy represented an "odd form ofintelligence".

The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World is likely to be pored over in Wall Street and the City for clues to Mr Greenspan's still hugely influential views on the economy.

He forecasts that inflation will be harder to contain in future and predicts that far higher interest rates will be needed to maintain price stability.

Economists have been critical of his 2003 decision to cut interest rates which, they argue, helped create the housing bubble, the collapse of which provoked this northern summer's banking crisis.

Mr Greenspan defends the policy. "We wanted to shut down the possibility of corrosive deflation," he writes. "We were willing to chance that by cutting rates, we might foster a bubble, an inflationary boom of some sort, which we would subsequently have to address ... It was a decision done right."

In the book, which has an initial print run of one million copies, Mr Greenspan reveals details of his private life, including his relationship with television journalist Andrea Mitchell, 60. After their first date in 1985, he invited her back to his flat to read an economics paper he had written. They have been together since.

He started writing his memoir, for which he received a reported advance of $9.5 million, on the day he retired from the Fed in January last year. Most of it was composed in the bath, a practice he began after he received a back injury in the 1960s.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

BIG story this!

snoopsnuffleopagus
18-09-2007, 03:12 PM
THE US's elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has shaken the White House by declaring that the prime motive for the war in Iraq was oil.

"I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil," he says.

Cordial Felicitations!: Major:

Though the 'Black Gold' is definitely a prime motive, my opinion is an 'Esoteric' reason supercedes the 'Materiel' reason.

'I See'; New Babylon engaging Old Babylon, in four short years, over 1,000,000 Iraqis have been slain.

At anytime, from Invasion, to post invasion mode, New Babylon could have secured that Nation. The deliberate disregard of Iraqis and Coalition Forces security and well being transcends Materiel gain.

New Babylon did not secure the Iraqi Armories, thus allowing massive tonnage of high explosives to be purloined, returning the explosives to the Troops and Population, 5, 10 pounds at a time.

The Carnage and Genocide were entirely preventable. As Brutal and Murderous New Babylon was in Viet-Nam, they have increased the Horror of War exponentionaly.

Colour Me Disgusted!, Respectfully: Snoopsnuffleopagus

davidbarstis
18-09-2007, 03:16 PM
Greenspan doesn't mind saying that and his handlers don't mind because it wasn't just about the oil. But they would much rather people believe that because it still hides the truth.

revolutionary_jam
18-09-2007, 04:08 PM
Distraction. The reason for the war is multi-faceted, oil is only a small part of it.

eternal_spirit
18-09-2007, 04:20 PM
There are more capped oil wells and more oil in Alaska possibly than any other country. This has been known and documented since about 1930.

They must make more money from the oil from abroad. that's the only reason that makes sense. Same reason the manufacturing industries and cola mining etc import from other countries now days in Britain.

They only care about profit the Elite, if it means destroying industry in their own countries they don't care.

eternal_spirit
18-09-2007, 04:25 PM
Wars and the money borrowed to finance them have lead to the collapse of many great economies. This is a common tactic and plan used by the Elite.

Some have predicted the collapse of the USA economy and possibly the UK's due to these sad wars. Just like what happened in the first and second world wars.

The Elite bankers are in war for profit not to save any opressed peoples.

john white
18-09-2007, 04:25 PM
One point about this, in case anyon'e missing it, is the head of the Fed directly contradicting the Whitehouse about why there is a War going on is quite useful with the whole "waking people up" thing: deeper levels not withstanding, its showing a dis-united front. Coupled with Keane and Hamilton jumping off the sinking 9/11 commission ship last week, and its looking like getting ready to hang Bush out to dry time: which at least may mean we might avoid War in Iran

snoopsnuffleopagus
18-09-2007, 04:32 PM
Cordial Felicitations:

Keene and Hamilton can jump all they want. At the 'end of the day' they are traitorous, stinking cowards. Remember, Bush tried to have Hank Kissinger lead the 'Dog & Pony' show.

Respectfully: Snoopsnuffleopagus

eternal_spirit
18-09-2007, 04:37 PM
One point about this, in case anyon'e missing it, is the head of the Fed directly contradicting the Whitehouse about why there is a War going on is quite useful with the whole "waking people up" thing: deeper levels not withstanding, its showing a dis-united front. Coupled with Keane and Hamilton jumping off the sinking 9/11 commission ship last week, and its looking like getting ready to hang Bush out to dry time: which at least may mean we might avoid War in Iran
........

Yes that's what more and more people are noticing, how the Government changes it's reasons.

The retaliation over 9/11 another example ...many Americans believed this was why the War with Iraqu escalated. Wasn't it Bush who said 9/11 wasn't the reason for the War carrying on?

There's no proof that Muslim extremists did 9/11. And Bin Laden is a Saudi?

eternal_spirit
18-09-2007, 04:41 PM
The hardest thing most find to accept is what Icke and others said That there is a group of Elite Families and orgonisations manufacturing wars and world events for their own gain at the expense of every race /country.

We have to consider are these people human.

john white
18-09-2007, 04:44 PM
Wasn't it Bush who said 9/11 wasn't the reason for the War carrying on?


Ah, but that was only after it was clear 9/11 couldnt be the reason! Before that, he must have linked "Iraq" and "9/11" hundreds of times