View Full Version : ** The abolition of Britain **
synergy777
17-09-2007, 04:50 PM
The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty in 2008
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/
http://eutruth.org.uk/
The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty in 2008
The sixth and final treaty has now been named: its is the Reform Treaty, due to be signed by the Queen in the Summer of 2008. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.
Merkel and former French President Giscard d’Estaing are among many European ministers who have confirmed the Treaty is the EU Constitution, almost unchanged. If they are right, it will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU dictatorship the power to close it.
This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital.
The Countdown to abolition
Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.
Foreign ministers will agree its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There will be a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hope to sign the Treaty, but definitely before December 2007. This should be Gordon Brown’s signature.
The Queen and Parliament to abolish Britain summer 2008
They plan to ratify the Reform Treaty in the Summer of 2008. This means Westminster will pass the treaty, and the Queen will sign it behind our backs, as she has the other five treaties.
No referendum
The EU has chosen this sixth Treaty instead of pushing through it’s constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations.
Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document with absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices will add up to something like 100,000 complex and unreadable pages.
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.
The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.
You have one year left
Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just one year left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship.
Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don’t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.
seanx
17-09-2007, 05:08 PM
What's the difference between the UK and EU?
Instead of giving your power to the Elite, represented by
the Queen , you're giving your power to the SAME Elite,
only a different branch of the Elite, the Brussels branch of
the family
What's happening is just a battle between the Elite/ Illuminati
- to see who controls the most power.
People in UK better off getting rid of their monarchy and
the Elite families that run them and setting up a real republic
with a real WRITTEN constitution.
And then telling the EU to take a hike.
synergy777
17-09-2007, 05:14 PM
we need a republic, but the people have to wake up now, 12mths is a short time, after that its gone. england will be finished, ruled by brussels, its shocking. i love the amount of media coverage its getting, the sad thing is that theres no oppostion, no figurehead, organisation that can spread this news. we all know about the complicity of the corporate media in regards to the elite agenda.
you would think patriots in the establishment, forces etc would start to stand up and be counted, alas i see no one.
woghd
17-09-2007, 08:08 PM
I fear we will have a similar story in the United States soon...
Archangel
edelweiss pirate
17-09-2007, 09:06 PM
The british people will go nuts when they hear about it... oops no they won't because they'll never strike again since their fucking mortgage repayments went through the roof.
Damn!
We'll stop 'em though, we the liberated meddlers will see to that... right folks?
synergy777
17-09-2007, 10:10 PM
its ironic that an asian would post something for the absent patriots, lol
gravityhero23
18-09-2007, 02:21 AM
Most informative thread Synergy - I for one agree whole heartedly and might add, I for one will be doing my upmost in my respective field of media manipulation to highlight this...poetic punk patriot - but we know the guelph links with the SMOM and that the Eu is really Vaticon in disguise....
maybe its a simple case of the division of the Uk and a lack of unity urine regarding the many parasites of the shit system EL iting their mess on the herd.
Oh and what with the country at war - and its peoples bombarded daily with the unclean brainwashing Soap powders of Kontrol - - CCTV soul destroying arsehole that has been fucked by the Illuminati Cult for just one more goal
World domination and subjagation of all inhabitants of Starship HeART
---- btw your irony Synergy777 is no more ironic than me calling a guy from Pakistan a Paki....an Australian an Aussie or a round eyed devil Ozzy, its all layers within layers political incorrectness blessed with humour full chests.
been reading your posts on the Unhivedand find that I feel inclined to support your moonshine licquered mind somewhat - i'm in growth turmoil by some of the racial meanderings over there though. Particularly when the race mixing thing is scorned upon, shit what about all the amazing mixed blood creative musicians, songwriters, shamans and heartfelt compassionate motherfuckers that have benevolently vibrated the bars of the birdcage and enabled us to see through. they dont get much mention over there, I occasionally find.
Anyway rant over - I certainly support all the human beings that are manipulated ethnically in any country, its the jesuit El ite that are tinkering with the immigration issues - - some but not all humans certainly resemble animals coralled into the freedom trough or glimpsing greener fields of non pain and survival security, I hope we can all graze in peace, even the Elite although they need to stop stuffing their many faces and share that taste of health
adimon
18-09-2007, 04:03 AM
What's the difference between the UK and EU?
Instead of giving your power to the Elite, represented by
the Queen , you're giving your power to the SAME Elite,
only a different branch of the Elite, the Brussels branch of
the family
What's happening is just a battle between the Elite/ Illuminati
- to see who controls the most power.
People in UK better off getting rid of their monarchy and
the Elite families that run them and setting up a real republic
with a real WRITTEN constitution.
And then telling the EU to take a hike.
For once, my man, we entirely agree. I'd do anything for a republic with a written constitution. Something worth fighting for.
The events - as you've presented them above, and as presented in your sources - DEFINITELY won't happen next year though, synergy777.
Obviously I can't prove it, cuz it's the future. But I'll wager you...
What is a 'patriot' anyway? I'm sure people have very different ideas on that, and yet many people would call themselves patriots. I certainly want to see Britain protected, and free, but I don't support the footie team anymore (cuz they've been shit for the last 10years) and have won more than £1000 in bets against them. :D
synergy777
18-09-2007, 02:02 PM
did anyone watch newsnight.they talking about the treaty. and that twat ming, from the liberal democrats, is a fully paid up member if the eu nazi superstate. don't except the mps to object, as they will have increased salaries thanks to the eu. don't accept the people, because frankly they are slaves who love their servitude to state/queen. bar a miracle, i can't really see anything stopping it. i do expect after the dollars devaluation/ introduction of the amero, the same to be done with sterling, to make way for the euro.
i will for one will not tolerate an eu superstate, and will move to india. the eu will suffer a huge lifestyle change as outlined in the bilderberg agenda. asia will not comply to carbon footprint, as its the industrial west who has got the world into this carbon problem, hence they must make the cuts, asia with its resources, future growth, energy is the place to be. they will not make cuts, watch the elite move as they are doing. its going to be a huge shift, with west taking a drop in living standards and the east having an increase in living standards.
greenleaf
18-09-2007, 03:24 PM
well this page i wouldn't know if it is linked..the page is older though, and mix it with this and we have a 'One World System'
British American Project (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=British_American_Project)
synergy777
18-09-2007, 03:28 PM
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=British_American_Project
British American Project
From SourceWatch
The British American Project for the Successor Generation, to give it its original, and now quietly forgotten, title, is an elite corporate/political talking and networking organisation. Its aims are to ensure that the left and liberal intelligentsia are not hostile to US foreign policy interests. The British American Project is like the Trade Union Committee for European and Transatlantic Understanding but rather less obscure. For example, it has a website.
'The Project's annual four-day conference brings together 24 exceptional people (aged between 28-40) from each side of the Atlantic to tackle a specific issue of importance to both countries. Delegates are chosen for proven leadership in their field, and are drawn from a wide range of backgrounds and views; they include senior representatives from business, government, the media, voluntary /non-profit organisations, medicine, and the armed forces.' [1]
In 2003 John Pilger noted that "Five members of Blair's first cabinet, along with his chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, were members of the British American Project for a Successor Generation, a masonry of chosen politicians and journalists, conceived by the far-right oil baron J. Howard Pew and launched by Ronald Reagan and Rupert Murdoch." [2]
It claims that 'Press coverage in the UK has suggested that the project is either a right wing conspiracy or a New Labour conspiracy. Is either of these allegations true? Sadly not. See the article on the project's history for details of its origins and the rest of this web site for its current orientation.'
It hasn't had any coverage in either of the left-leaning British broadsheets. However, the New Statesman says "But the project is only one of many schemes through which the British elite learns to love and live with America: the Kennedy scholarships, the Fulbrights and Harknesses, the International Visitor Program, together with more overtly agenda-driven institutions such as the Atlantic Council of the United Kingdom and the Trades Union Committee for European and Transatlantic Understanding. Taking all these into consideration accounts for almost every minister and adviser in the Labour Party."
The British-American Project for the Successor Generation (as it used to be known before it quietly contracted its title) was founded in 1985. Each year the project invites 24 American and 24 British delegates to take part in four days of dinners, parties and discussions (ranging from the nature of the "special relationship" to security and economic issues). Delegates enjoy comparative luxury (the class of '98 stayed at the $285-a-night Omni Royal Crescent in New Orleans). The aim, to quote the report of the 1985 conference, is "to create, at a time of growing international strains and stresses, a closer rapport between Britain and the United States among people likely to become influential decision-makers during the next two decades". Delegates are nominated by existing fellows; once they have come through the process of selection (in the UK, this is based on competitive debating sessions with other nominees), they have their travel and other expenses paid to the more or less exotic locations of the conference. Last year New Orleans, this year . . . Harrogate...
The project was first suggested in 1982 by Nick Butler, a Labour Party insider of the old right and a research fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House). Along with many others in the US and Britain who viewed the special relationship favourably, he had become concerned about the growing tide of anti-American sentiment, particularly within his own party. This was the time of Greenham Common, CND and the battles over US deployment of cruise missiles in Europe. Vietnam and Watergate were fresh in everyone's memory.
Butler's response was to propose a series of conferences, similar in format to the annual get-together of the Anglo-German elite at Konigswinter, developing personal relationships between the participants and broadening understanding. This rapidly gained backing from Chatham House, then from other establishment bodies, such as the Royal United Services Institute and the US embassy in London. But at this stage there seemed little prospect of funding.
It was Sir Charles Villiers, the former chairman of British Steel, who overcame this obstacle by roping in two American anglophile friends of his, Lew van Dusen and Isadore Scott, who were able to secure $460,000 through the Pew Charitable Trusts, the second biggest grant-making body in the US. [3]
Members
UK members of the British-American Project include:
Peter Mandelson EU trade commissioner
Jonathan Powell Tony Blair's chief of staff
Jeremy Paxman broadcast journalist and author
Mo Mowlam former Labour Northern Ireland secretary
Adair Turner head of pensions commission and ex head of CBI
Trevor Phillips chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality
James Naughtie broadcast journalist and author
Matthew Taylor Downing Street head of policy
Chris Smith former Labour culture secretary
Baroness Elizabeth Symons Foreign Office minister
Lord George Robertson former Nato secretary-general
Douglas Alexander Foreign Office and trade minister
Wendy Alexander Member of the Scottish Parliament and former Scottish Executive minister
Geoff Mulgan former head of Downing Street's policy and strategy unit
Baroness Scotland Home Office minister
Julia Hobsbawm public relations consultant
Steve Hilton Conservative special adviser
Benjamin Zephaniah poet and activist
Colonel Bob Stewart former commander of British forces in Bosnia
David Willetts Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary
Alan Sked founder of Ukip
Stephen Dorrell former Conservative Health Secretary
Yasmin Alibhai-Brown columnist and broadcaster
Charles Moore former editor of the Daily Telegraph
Nick Butler BP group vice-president, strategy and policy development
Lord Lipsey Labour peer and author
[edit]External links
Andy Beckett 'Friends in high places' The Guardian, Saturday November 6, 2004.
Tom Easton 'The British American Project for the Successor Generation' from: Lobster: parapolitics and state research journal http://www.lobster-magazine.co.uk [4]
DAVID T. JOHNSON, MINISTER, US Embassy, London, Speeches & Remarks 04 November 2005 'Remarks at the British-American Project Annual Conference in Birmingham' [5]
Duncan Parrish, "The British-American Project: right-wing conspiracy or right-on broker of the special relationship?", New Statesman, May 17, 1999.
Official site of The British-American Project
adimon
18-09-2007, 03:56 PM
[QUOTE=synergy777;128701
The British American Project for the Successor Generation, to give it its original, and now quietly forgotten, title, is an elite corporate/political talking and networking organisation.
[/QUOTE]
So what do you believe this group is really about then Synergy777? NWO?
It seems legit to me I must admit - i.e. not a PTB cog.
synergy777
18-09-2007, 04:22 PM
from mandelson, robertson, zepiniah, very interesting. its must have elite connections. was shocked to see zepiniah. this is why i just get the feeling of sheer utter futility, there is nothing organised, funded to oppose the nwo. its just us, and we are merely armchair spectators. you would think that there would something, anyhthing aligned to freedom/creator.
the devil helps his own, while the creator leaves us alone.
its not even david v goliath, its worse odds that that.
adimon
19-09-2007, 02:33 AM
from mandelson, robertson, zepiniah, very interesting. its must have elite connections. was shocked to see zepiniah.
I'll repeat my question - why do you think it's linked to NWO? It it purely because of personnel?
Why were you shocked to see Zephaniah? Do you take him seriously?
I attended a poetry reading of his where he sat there and repeated the words MADNESS and WAR for about half an hour. Hardly eloquent. When he was done, a few people in the audience started bigging him up the rest left, bored, disappointed and ripped off.
I asked him about on his relative who had been made famous for avoiding a custodial sentence despite conviction (and confession without remorse) to over 200 robberies. I asked him because I had previously heard him show his own disdain for his relative. I phrased the question along the lines of "How's he getting on? Is he alright?" and Zephaniah told me to fuck off and spat on my shoe.