PDA

View Full Version : Charlie Sheen arrrested


graflok
26-12-2009, 01:21 AM
Actor Charlie Sheen was arrested early Friday and charged with several
offenses with a domestic violence component, Aspen, Colorado, police
said. Source here (http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/TV/12/25/charlie.sheen.arrested/index.html).

Gee, isn't it great that he's a "9/11 Truther"? :rolleyes: (sarcasm)

I posted earlier that having Sheen associated with 9/11 Truth was not
good news and many here didn't believe it. Perhaps this will help convince.:)

cstewart1987
26-12-2009, 01:40 AM
tbh, sounds liek a set/frame up.

steevo
26-12-2009, 01:54 AM
tbh, sounds liek a set/frame up.

+1

If the PTB ARE using Charlie Sheen to discredit people who say "911 was an inside job", then they are obviously VERY desperate, cos it aint working.

sofa king
26-12-2009, 01:59 AM
+1

If the PTB ARE using Charlie Sheen to discredit people who say "911 was an inside job", then they are obviously VERY desperate, cos it aint working.


then there is the other side of CHarlie Sheen. The one that is a womanizer, uses protitutes and has a history of alcohol abuse.

steevo
26-12-2009, 02:00 AM
then there is the other side of CHarlie Sheen. The one that is a womanizer, uses protitutes and has a history of alcohol abuse.

Yes but even IF that is true, 911 was STILL an inside job.
You can call people all the names under the sun, but the truth of 911 still stands.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 02:06 AM
then there is the other side of CHarlie Sheen. The one that is a womanizer, uses protitutes and has a history of alcohol abuse.

Judge not until you judge yourself,

ever heard of Propaganda the MSM are experts at it pal,just like you are.

sofa king
26-12-2009, 02:06 AM
Yes but even IF that is true, 911 was STILL an inside job.
You can call people all the names under the sun, but the truth of 911 still stands.


true, Im just saying this sounds like more of Sheen's self-destructive behaviour than any attempt to silence him.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 02:07 AM
true, Im just saying this sounds like more of Sheen's self-destructive behaviour than any attempt to silence him.

Bull shite

cstewart1987
26-12-2009, 02:20 AM
Do not judge, one cannot judge, unless youve walked in there shoes, no no no. Only God can judge you, a victim he may be, we all are and will remain, until judgement.,

I love this new meme,

1 things for sure 9/11 was an inside job.

Could the creator please make themselves heard and take credit,..

Claps..:)

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 02:28 AM
Do not judge, one cannot judge, unless youve walked in there shoes, no no no. Only God can judge you, a victim he may be, we all are and will remain, until judgement.,

I love this new meme,

1 things for sure 9/11 was an inside job.

Could the creator please make themselves heard and take credit,..

Claps..:)

Its a pity the controlled MSM cannot see it especially SKY BBC and Al nimmo Jazeera bunch of cowards.

are you lot some kind of wind up merchants or what :p

1 thing is for sure it was,until someone or thing proves otherwise.

what a load of bull it all is.

thedefender
26-12-2009, 03:24 AM
Actually I think Charlie Sheen over the past few years has been clean. I don't think he is known for any of his past behavioral (sp?) problems anymore.

I could be wrong!

1776
26-12-2009, 03:27 AM
then there is the other side of CHarlie Sheen. The one that is a womanizer, uses protitutes and has a history of alcohol abuse.

Very true.

Bull shite

What the man said was true. Charlie Sheen is all of those things, and they didn't give him the highest paying sitcom on TV for any old reason...... he's CONTROLLED OPPOSITION as well, and his father is a known Jesuit. Turns out, though, that you are the one that is FULL OF SHIT here.

the_giver
26-12-2009, 07:04 AM
it's no big deal. So he got arrested for a domestic dispute. This is completely normal behavior for most americans around the holidays. A lot of drinking, a lot of partying. Sometimes things get out of hand and when the 'man' gets a chance to arrest a celeb, they take full advantage of it!

Charlie Sheen is a great man with balls bigger than most!

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 06:54 PM
Very true.



What the man said was true. Charlie Sheen is all of those things, and they didn't give him the highest paying sitcom on TV for any old reason...... he's CONTROLLED OPPOSITION as well, and his father is a known Jesuit. Turns out, though, that you are the one that is FULL OF SHIT here.

More bull from pazuzu:rolleyes:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=96703&page=2

1776
26-12-2009, 07:14 PM
More bull from pazuzu:rolleyes:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=96703&page=2

Instead of proving your side of the argument with facts you decide to use ad-hominem attacks against me proving your desperation and your idiocy. Good job! :p

trix
26-12-2009, 07:21 PM
Charlie Sheen is a notorious bad boy. This is not some set up to make him look bad. He is no angel and has had problems with booze and domestic disputes in the past.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 07:40 PM
Instead of proving your side of the argument with facts you decide to use ad-hominem attacks against me proving your desperation and your idiocy. Good job! :p

go back to bad err I mean bed pazuzu.

Charlie Sheen is a notorious bad boy. This is not some set up to make him look bad. He is no angel and has had problems with booze and domestic disputes in the past.

how do you know?because the MSM tells you so.

1776
26-12-2009, 08:04 PM
go back to bad err I mean bed pazuzu.



how do you know?because the MSM tells you so.

Do you honestly think because you continue to call me "pazuzu" it will eventually discredit me?

Haha:D


Show us how your great Charlie Sheen has done wonders for the "Truth Movement" :p

I'll be waiting....

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 08:09 PM
Do you honestly think because you continue to call me "pazuzu" it will eventually discredit me?

Haha:D


Show us how your great Charlie Sheen has done wonders for the "Truth Movement" :p

I'll be waiting....

Pazuzu :D

get behind me thee :D

limelady
26-12-2009, 08:19 PM
then there is the other side of CHarlie Sheen. The one that is a womanizer, uses protitutes and has a history of alcohol abuse.

Well yes, but we have a fair number of people on this forum who consider themselves truth seekers, yet have confessed they go to prostitutes, use woman for sex, support the pornography industry, use illegal street drugs and drink alcohol etc, and no doubt a number of them are 9/11 truthers too.

My point being, Sheen is just a man with weaknesses like any other man who does similar. :)

marpat
26-12-2009, 08:38 PM
Well yes, but we have a fair number of people on this forum who consider themselves truth seekers, yet have confessed they go to prostitutes, use woman for sex, support the pornography industry, use illegal street drugs and drink alcohol etc, and no doubt a number of them are 9/11 truthers too.

My point being, Sheen is just a man with weaknesses like any other man who does similar. :)

Would you class second degree assault as a weakness? I dont think his victim would be so optimistic.

Personally I think the only reason people are getting behind him is because he has spoken out on 911. The same with Robby Williams, once he mentioned being into conspiracy stuff people were saying what a good guy he is, etc.

1776
26-12-2009, 08:39 PM
Well yes, but we have a fair number of people on this forum who consider themselves truth seekers, yet have confessed they go to prostitutes, use woman for sex, support the pornography industry, use illegal street drugs and drink alcohol etc, and no doubt a number of them are 9/11 truthers too.

My point being, Sheen is just a man with weaknesses like any other man who does similar. :)

Because supposed "truthers" registered on the DI forum do it, it makes it OK?

Weakness is one thing, but Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition at its finest. Why do you think he has the HIGHEST PAYING TELEVISION SITCOM today? Why? Do you think they'd give Charlie that position if he were truly EXPOSING THE POWERS THAT BE? Seriously think about that one for a minute, knowing all you know about television programming and mind control and its end goal being One World Government.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 08:42 PM
Would you class second degree assault as a weakness? I dont think his victim would be so optimistic.

Personally I think the only reason people are getting behind him is because he has spoken out on 911. The same with Robby Williams, once he mentioned being into conspiracy stuff people were saying what a good guy he is, etc.

You are putting words in peoples mouth,

How do you know he,s assaulted anyone.

Oh I know because the MSM says so, just like the MSM says Muslims carried out 911.

get outta here.

maybe you should be spending more time with your wife seeing she is having TRIPLETS.

steevo
26-12-2009, 08:42 PM
Because supposed "truthers" registered on the DI forum do it, it makes it OK?

Weakness is one thing, but Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition at its finest. Why do you think he has the HIGHEST PAYING TELEVISION SITCOM today? Why? Do you think they'd give Charlie that position if he were truly EXPOSING THE POWERS THAT BE? Seriously think about that one for a minute, knowing all you know about television programming and mind control and its end goal being One World Government.

Well if he is working for the PTB, it dont seem to be doing the PTB any good, cos Charlie Sheen is helping to wake people up, and if THAT is what the PTB WANT, then GOOD lol :D

limelady
26-12-2009, 09:09 PM
Because supposed "truthers" registered on the DI forum do it, it makes it OK?

Weakness is one thing, but Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition at its finest. Why do you think he has the HIGHEST PAYING TELEVISION SITCOM today? Why? Do you think they'd give Charlie that position if he were truly EXPOSING THE POWERS THAT BE? Seriously think about that one for a minute, knowing all you know about television programming and mind control and its end goal being One World Government.

Did I say it was O.K.?

Did I even imply it is O.K.?

I don't judge people to that degree....I just said it is something that others have confessed here and they consider themselves truth seekers.

Blimey. :(

marpat
26-12-2009, 09:12 PM
You are putting words in peoples mouth,

How do you know he,s assaulted anyone.

Oh I know because the MSM says so, just like the MSM says Muslims carried out 911.

get outta here.

maybe you should be spending more time with your wife seeing she is having TRIPLETS.

Sorry, do my opinions offend your hero worship.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20091226/ten-charlie-sheen-jailed-on-violence-cha-ea4616c.html

The 44-year-old has been booked on felony charges of second-degree assault and menacing, and a misdemeanor charge of criminal mischief according to police.

Chose to ignore the facts if you will.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 09:32 PM
Sorry, do my opinions offend your hero worship.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20091226/ten-charlie-sheen-jailed-on-violence-cha-ea4616c.html

The 44-year-old has been booked on felony charges of second-degree assault and menacing, and a misdemeanor charge of criminal mischief according to police.

Chose to ignore the facts if you will.

Oh yeah because Yahoo says so,

I have been on the receiving end of a violent woman and they can be worse than any man believe you me.

so take a hike M pat.

get back to looking after your pregnant wife,or you may get done for neglect.

He is speaking out against the Lies of 911 and the establishment do not like it.

I suppose you are an angel.

You do not fool me.

marpat
26-12-2009, 09:34 PM
.

I suppose you are an angel.

You do not fool me.

There is no need to fool a fool

marpat
26-12-2009, 09:37 PM
Oh yeah because Yahoo says so,

I have been on the receiving end of a violent woman and they can be worse than any man believe you me.

.

True but that does not mean he did not do it. What is your interest in protecting him? if people were quoting MSM articles about Crowley you would be claiming it was all factual.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 09:42 PM
True but that does not mean he did not do it. What is your interest in protecting him? if people were quoting MSM articles about Crowley you would be claiming it was all factual.

Crowley not my cup of tea but if you are into that sort of thing,away you go.

I do not believe the MSM

they are lying about 911 and the rest of it.

boots
26-12-2009, 10:14 PM
Gee, isn't it great that he's a "9/11 Truther"? :rolleyes: (sarcasm)

I posted earlier that having Sheen associated with 9/11 Truth was not
good news and many here didn't believe it. Perhaps this will help convince.:)


So gets arrested on a trumped up charge in a state which has a draconian law for SECOND degree assault. In other words he slapped someone and was pissed. BIG DEAL.

TPTB are after him, they will make any case against him, they can.
.

lightgiver
26-12-2009, 10:25 PM
There is no need to fool a fool

And you are the biggest 1 of them all

heartysoup
26-12-2009, 10:47 PM
Charlie Sheen and 9/11 are barely related.

He supported the 'we knew it was going to happen, and let it happen' theory...

Rather than the.... 'we developed free energy devices, weaponized them, put them into space, and blew up our own financial sector.' story.

So nobody is going to silence someone who is derailing the real story.

Richard Gage, Steven Jones, and David Ray Griffen, are a bit like that too... except they push thermite... another dead end...

trix
27-12-2009, 12:14 AM
go back to bad err I mean bed pazuzu.



how do you know?because the MSM tells you so.

If your theory is true, the MSM knew that 9/11 was going to happen years and years before it did, and knew that Charlie would be speaking out against it and set up stories about his bad boy ways and years of assault accusations. :rolleyes:

Not everything is a conspiracy. Some people are just alcoholic, drug induced abusers.

lightgiver
27-12-2009, 01:23 AM
If your theory is true, the MSM knew that 9/11 was going to happen years and years before it did, and knew that Charlie would be speaking out against it and set up stories about his bad boy ways and years of assault accusations. :rolleyes:

Not everything is a conspiracy. Some people are just alcoholic, drug induced abusers.

and you would know finger pointer :rolleyes:

Most of the MSM are clueless not the ones who own it.

take ya blinds off,or maybe they already are eh.

911 was an inside job just like all the wars we have been under for the last few thousand years.

do not get clever with me.

muddyleopard
27-12-2009, 10:46 AM
what if the whole assault event was cooked up between charlie and his handlers ... he draws attention to 9-11, then beats his ex, loses credibility ... i'm just kidding. go with my cut here, charlie's alright, even if he can be an ashole.

sofa king
27-12-2009, 02:33 PM
what if the whole assault event was cooked up between charlie and his handlers ... he draws attention to 9-11, then beats his ex, loses credibility ... i'm just kidding. go with my cut here, charlie's alright, even if he can be an ashole.

what if it's even more simple than that.

cooked up by Charlie's publicist for attention. Not unlike Kanye, Brtiney, et al that use shock to increase their public value.

lightgiver
27-12-2009, 07:42 PM
what if the whole assault event was cooked up between charlie and his handlers ... he draws attention to 9-11, then beats his ex, loses credibility ... i'm just kidding. go with my cut here, charlie's alright, even if he can be an ashole.

Rubbish.

camreeno
29-12-2009, 07:34 AM
I guess we have to get a new frontman. This is a little unfortunate.

montag
29-12-2009, 07:50 AM
In other words he slapped someone and was pissed. BIG DEAL.


.
I'm sorry boots, but getting pissed and abusing your wife is a big deal in my book, In fact according to his wifes 911 call he put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her. Charlie Sheen may be awake to the NWO but he's also obviously a fuckwit..

1776
29-12-2009, 08:11 AM
Well if he is working for the PTB, it dont seem to be doing the PTB any good, cos Charlie Sheen is helping to wake people up, and if THAT is what the PTB WANT, then GOOD lol :D

Charlie Sheen isn't waking anyone up to anything that isn't already out there in the mainstream news! He is controlled opposition, and he's only there right now to make the 9/11 "Truth" Movement look like fools and lunatics!

Ask yourself this: How is it that Charlie Sheen, the 9/11 "Truth" Celebrity, is given the HIGHEST PAYING TELEVISION SITCOM on TV right now (Two and Half Men)?

He isn't on our side, for starters......

As for him beating his wife? Not a big deal?

It's a huge deal... and he will walk away from this unscathed as he always does, with minor scrapes from the press that will only boost ratings for his network TV show anyhow!

matrix911
29-12-2009, 08:26 AM
Well, I guess it won't be long before we'll be hearing about Jesse Ventura's criminal mischief or some illegal shenanigans. :rolleyes:

1776... I understand your suspicions and HAVE seen all the labrinth docs and many others..
but I'm still on the fence in the case of sheen, jones and some others as it relates to controlled opposition etc.

So you think JV is C-Opp as well? As to JV, not a chance... he's got some big balls imo and i have alot of respect for what he's just put his ass on the line to do.

1776
29-12-2009, 09:08 AM
Well, I guess it won't be long before we'll be hearing about Jesse Ventura's criminal mischief or some illegal shenanigans. :rolleyes:

1776... I understand your suspicions and HAVE seen all the labrinth docs and many others..
but I'm still on the fence in the case of sheen, jones and some others as it relates to controlled opposition etc.

So you think JV is C-Opp as well? As to JV, not a chance... he's got some big balls imo and i have alot of respect for what he's just put his ass on the line to do.

Jesse "The Body" Ventura has big balls? You don't think his TV show is doing exactly what the Occult Agenda wants? It's INDOCTRINATING everyone into the "Conspiracy Theory" world, but of course just touching the surface as Alex does on his show. Jesse Ventura still thinks that Obama needs more time before we criticize him after saying that Obama "is already fudging up" in the Obama Deception that Alex produced earlier this year which is completely contradictory, thus a big fat lie!

You can choose to be deceived willingly, that's up to you..... I'll stick to the facts, because the facts are right there for all who wish to know them. I can't just say to myself "well he's talking about 9/11, so he must be a good guy on our side...." No, sorry, it's much more than that... there's forces at work here far scarier than most can imagine. Jesse Ventura is FRIENDS with many of the leaders who have been pushing this GLOBAL WARMING bullshit from the late 60's - early 70's, admitted in his own words (Al Gore, Maurice Strong, and others) Keep believing this rubbish all you wish, but don't say you weren't forewarned here on the David Icke forum board!

There are MANY wolves in sheeps clothing today!!

steevo
29-12-2009, 11:19 AM
Charlie Sheen isn't waking anyone up to anything that isn't already out there in the mainstream news! He is controlled opposition, and he's only there right now to make the 9/11 "Truth" Movement look like fools and lunatics!

Ask yourself this: How is it that Charlie Sheen, the 9/11 "Truth" Celebrity, is given the HIGHEST PAYING TELEVISION SITCOM on TV right now (Two and Half Men)?

He isn't on our side, for starters......

As for him beating his wife? Not a big deal?

It's a huge deal... and he will walk away from this unscathed as he always does, with minor scrapes from the press that will only boost ratings for his network TV show anyhow!


Well, like I already said, the PTB must be ABSOLUTELY f*cking desperate then :D
I dont reckon that Sheen is working for the PTB, BUT as always I will keep an open mind.

steevo
29-12-2009, 11:20 AM
I'm sorry boots, but getting pissed and abusing your wife is a big deal in my book, In fact according to his wifes 911 call he put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her. Charlie Sheen may be awake to the NWO but he's also obviously a fuckwit..

Is it true though ?

montag
29-12-2009, 12:44 PM
Is it true though ?
Based on his history I'd think it was.

steevo
29-12-2009, 01:28 PM
Based on his history I'd think it was.

In a court of law, "history" is not classed as evidence. Just a thought.

drhemp
29-12-2009, 02:09 PM
Seems very convenient for the PTB that a prominent Hollywood actor and 9/11 truther is getting arrested on alleged on assault charges.

Just like I think it convenient for the PTB that the former MI5 agent, David Shayler, who was at one time a highly media savvy and credible spokesman for the Truth Movement, is now a cross dressing freak who thinks he's Jesus.

sofa king
29-12-2009, 02:37 PM
Seems very convenient for the PTB that a prominent Hollywood actor and 9/11 truther is getting arrested on alleged on assault charges.

.

the other side of the coin is the convenience for the PTB that one of their critics has a history of violent behaviour and substance abuse already. A history that they don't necessarily need to inflame as he is more than capable of falling down on his own.

drhemp
29-12-2009, 02:52 PM
the other side of the coin is the convenience for the PTB that one of their critics has a history of violent behaviour and substance abuse already. A history that they don't necessarily need to inflame as he is more than capable of falling down on his own.

Most Hollywood A-listers have a history of substance abuse, so what? I don't know about the other allegations. Has Mr Sheen ever been convicted of a violent offense?

amethyst
29-12-2009, 03:30 PM
I'm sorry boots, but getting pissed and abusing your wife is a big deal in my book, In fact according to his wifes 911 call he put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her. Charlie Sheen may be awake to the NWO but he's also obviously a fuckwit..

Not only that, but Charlie Sheen's previous wife Denise Richard's who had two little girls with him, also detailed a seriously screwed up relationship with him, accusing him of supposedly viewing child pornography. Which doesn't make for the greatest role model for the truth movement:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html

I think he could fit in the "controlled opposition" category.

drhemp
29-12-2009, 03:56 PM
Has he been convicted of any of these offenses, the answer is no, these are wild allegations which in my view are no doubt in the public domain, because Charlie Sheen used his A-list celebrity status to talk out against the crimes of the Bush regime. A lot of people were woken up about 911 thanks to Mr Sheen, so unless I actually see hard evidence that he is any of these things, I will give him the benefit of the doubt. After all, we are all innocent until proven guilty, and that's one of the things people like Gordon Brown are wanting to reverse, so that we're all guilty until proven innocent.

godgoo
29-12-2009, 04:10 PM
I'm sorry boots, but getting pissed and abusing your wife is a big deal in my book, In fact according to his wifes 911 call he put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her. Charlie Sheen may be awake to the NWO but he's also obviously a fuckwit..

What would you know about it though???

godgoo
29-12-2009, 04:13 PM
Has he been convicted of any of these offenses, the answer is no, these are wild allegations which in my view are no doubt in the public domain, because Charlie Sheen used his A-list celebrity status to talk out against the crimes of the Bush regime. A lot of people were woken up about 911 thanks to Mr Sheen, so unless I actually see hard evidence that he is any of these things, I will give him the benefit of the doubt. After all, we are all innocent until proven guilty, and that's one of the things people like Gordon Brown are wanting to reverse, so that we're all guilty until proven innocent.

He's wrapped up in a conspiracy, lol. He is well between a 50/50 divide. Doubt he'll need to worry about it too much, if there is no evidence. But seriously would you want to be in that situation if you wasn't either one of those things. I would go crazy. If they can stick him to atleast one, then alot of people will go with the rest. Maybe they know this, although they won't get a formal delivery. So I am suspicious lets see how the evidence turns out, they prove one but not everyone then lets go with adding bits.

white horse
29-12-2009, 06:24 PM
My point being, Sheen is just a man with weaknesses like any other man who does similar. :)

That is very true.

Non of us here is 100% clean and perfect. We are all sinners in some way.

Does not validate the search for truth that you have not mastered the physical weaknesses yet.

I know for a fact that most things in the public forum are a lie, yet I just couldn't help myself get all excited at the footie this weekend lol (even knowing it is all a scam)!!

The Sheen (and Douglas) families are well known full-blooded alpha males - so this does not surprise me at all.

It also does not seem to make a tinkers cuss worth of difference to the question of 911 - except that Charlie Sheen is a card being played on a bigger table than you or I know about. He may or may not be sincere...

torus
29-12-2009, 06:30 PM
Sheen receives approx. $800,000 US per episode of two and a half men....which is fine. medicocrity is an American specialty....coupled with a decent "wage". Sheen just rings HOLLOW to me.

white horse
29-12-2009, 07:41 PM
Sheen receives approx. $800,000 US per episode of two and a half men....which is fine. medicocrity is an American specialty....coupled with a decent "wage". Sheen just rings HOLLOW to me.

I'm not sure about ANYONE who speaks to me via the MSM - however, anyone, especially a Hollywood celeb, who stands up and says 'Investigate 911' is ok in my book.

Sheen may be a puppet like the rest - but does he realise how much of a puppet he is? Does he think he is being truly independant? How has his career been since that Alex Jones vid?

Incidentally - is someone like Sheen perhaps to hi up for them to 'bump' off right away? People won't ignore a Sheen... (specially since yoru dad is Pres)... was this really a poke in the eye to the ptb?

Something else I am becoming more aware of is the factionalisation of the ptb may be greater than I realised - perhaps this is a case of Sheen being played by one group against another?

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 07:54 PM
I'm sorry boots, but getting pissed and abusing your wife is a big deal in my book, In fact according to his wifes 911 call he put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her. Charlie Sheen may be awake to the NWO but he's also obviously a fuckwit..

How do you know?

oh its because the MSM says so on the phone:rolleyes:

have you ever had false accusations made against you?

I know I have

its a pity the msm cannot tell the truth about 911:rolleyes:

Not only that, but Charlie Sheen's previous wife Denise Richard's who had two little girls with him, also detailed a seriously screwed up relationship with him, accusing him of supposedly viewing child pornography. Which doesn't make for the greatest role model for the truth movement:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html

I think he could fit in the "controlled opposition" category.


with all due respect amethyst was you there,she likes to flaunt it in the movies I see ,Mrs Richards for Babylon holly wood.

Denise Richard, Lesbian scene

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUjTSTMiegg

check it out,great role model for the masses:

or maybe this one

Wild Things 2 - The sexy shower
Denise Richards in Wild Things - YouTube

seeing all the pointy fingers are out

yeah all angels bar poor old charley

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

I would say a witch hunt because of his outspoken views on 911

Judge Not

Bob Marley - Judge Not - YouTube

let those without sin cast the 1st stone

http://net.bible.org/verse.php?book=Joh&chapter=8&verse=7

I wonder sometimes about so called spiritual people

cstewart1987
29-12-2009, 10:01 PM
I would say a witch hunt because of his outspoken views on 911

Judge Not




Agreed.

Who else agrees, wonder if theres ever any evidence of foulplay by the government? lol

amethyst
29-12-2009, 10:07 PM
[QUOTE=white horse;1058510080]That is very true.

Non of us here is 100% clean and perfect. We are all sinners in some way.



Absolutely.

with all due respect amethyst was you there,she likes to flaunt it in the movies I see ,Mrs Richards for Babylon holly wood.

Of course not :D But did you read the previous Mrs. Sheen's very detailed report of her reasons for bringing sworn testimony against the Mr. Sheen listing in thesmokinggun.com link?

And now Mrs. Sheen #2 also just filed a similar life threatening charge. Apparently (and according to the report) that's why she felt compelled to bring charges against him. Because she listed that she felt her life was in danger, due to threats of physical and verbal abuse.

1776
29-12-2009, 10:19 PM
Agreed.

Who else agrees, wonder if theres ever any evidence of foulplay by the government? lol

Strongly disagree.


Consider the following:

http://www.hollywoodbackwash.com/2006/09/28/charlie-sheen-will-become-highest-paid-sit-com-star/

After several months of negotiations, “Two and a Half Men” star Charlie Sheen is said to finalizing a new contract that will have him earning $350,000 per episode this season. That would make the highest paid sit-com actor on tv today. I just don’t know if Charlie is $350,000 worth of funny.

This comes as good news to Charlie who has been wondering how in the hell he was going to pay his alimony, child support and maintain his current hooker/gambling budget.

http://hollywoodbackwash.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/charlie-sheen.jpg

http://popwatch.ew.com/2008/08/05/charlie-sheen-h/

According to TV Guide, Charlie Sheen is TV’s highest paid actor (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080804/en_nm/stars_dc;_ylt=ApH5BClYv21wGlIwHoVumWJxFb8C), taking home an estimated $825,000 an episode for his work on TV’s top sitcom, CBS’ Two and a Half Men. (That includes ownership in the show.) CSI star and exec producer William Petersen follows with $600,000 an episode. As for the women, Law & Order: SVU’s Mariska Hargitay comes in first with a payday of $400,000, while The Closer’s Kyra Sedgwick is runner-up with $275,000.

http://ewpopwatch.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/sheen_l.jpg

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/09/28/charlie-sheen-given-holly_n_30459.html

After two months of negotiations, "Two and a Half Men" star Charlie Sheen is close to finalizing a new salary pact that would make him the highest-paid comedy star in television today.

Sources said Sheen will earn about $350,000 per episode this season from producer of the CBS powerhouse, Warner Bros. Television. This represents a hefty increase from his previous payday in the low six figures.

___________________________________________

___________________________________________

Need I continue on with more and more articles?

Why would they give Charlie the HIGHEST PAYING TV Sitcom on Television today? This is set-up and designed to get Charlie rich, keep the "Conspiracy Theorists" looking stupid and loony, and FOOL YOU IN THE PROCESS and steer the whole "Truth" Movement away from the truth!

Use your INTUITION, your gut feeling, and please take a look at all the facts before thinking that Charlie Sheen is on YOUR side!

steevo
29-12-2009, 10:21 PM
Footballers get paid ALOT too, but they arent working for the PTB....or are they ?:eek:

1776
29-12-2009, 10:23 PM
Footballers get paid ALOT too, but they arent working for the PTB....or are they ?:eek:

You're taking this way out of context here, forgetting the rest of the story attached to Charlie Sheen that wouldn't line up with high-paid footballers who have nothing to do with the "Truth" Movement and aren't outspoken in the media concerning 9/11...

Red herring arguments won't work, Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition, period.

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 10:23 PM
100% agree with 1776.

steevo; do your idiot footballers "speak out" against 9/11?

steevo
29-12-2009, 10:25 PM
100% agree with 1776.

steevo; do your idiot footballers "speak out" against 9/11?

"My idiot footballers" ? :confused: Huh ?

Why do you ask ?

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 10:25 PM
[QUOTE]



Absolutely.



Of course not :D But did you read the previous Mrs. Sheen's very detailed report of her reasons for bringing sworn testimony against the Mr. Sheen listing in thesmokinggun.com link?

And now Mrs. Sheen #2 also just filed a similar life threatening charge. Apparently (and according to the report) that's why she felt compelled to bring charges against him. Because she listed that she felt her life was in danger, due to threats of physical and verbal abuse.

as soon as Sheen spoke out against 911 most people who are not asleep knew these accusations would start,

do you know them personally?

hey and some women can be as nasty as any bloke and tell lies also.

you appear to be not looking at the big picture:(

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 10:29 PM
Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition, period.


no doubt.

Steevo; what exactly does footballers making lots of money have to do with 9/11?

Anything? Even remotely?

1776
29-12-2009, 10:30 PM
Strongly disagree.

Consider the following:

http://www.hollywoodbackwash.com/2006/09/28/charlie-sheen-will-become-highest-paid-sit-com-star/

After several months of negotiations, “Two and a Half Men” star Charlie Sheen is said to finalizing a new contract that will have him earning $350,000 per episode this season. That would make the highest paid sit-com actor on tv today. I just don’t know if Charlie is $350,000 worth of funny.

This comes as good news to Charlie who has been wondering how in the hell he was going to pay his alimony, child support and maintain his current hooker/gambling budget.

http://hollywoodbackwash.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/charlie-sheen.jpg

http://popwatch.ew.com/2008/08/05/charlie-sheen-h/

According to TV Guide, Charlie Sheen is TV’s highest paid actor (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080804/en_nm/stars_dc;_ylt=ApH5BClYv21wGlIwHoVumWJxFb8C), taking home an estimated $825,000 an episode for his work on TV’s top sitcom, CBS’ Two and a Half Men. (That includes ownership in the show.) CSI star and exec producer William Petersen follows with $600,000 an episode. As for the women, Law & Order: SVU’s Mariska Hargitay comes in first with a payday of $400,000, while The Closer’s Kyra Sedgwick is runner-up with $275,000.

http://ewpopwatch.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/sheen_l.jpg

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/09/28/charlie-sheen-given-holly_n_30459.html

After two months of negotiations, "Two and a Half Men" star Charlie Sheen is close to finalizing a new salary pact that would make him the highest-paid comedy star in television today.

Sources said Sheen will earn about $350,000 per episode this season from producer of the CBS powerhouse, Warner Bros. Television. This represents a hefty increase from his previous payday in the low six figures.

___________________________________________

___________________________________________

Need I continue on with more and more articles?

Why would they give Charlie the HIGHEST PAYING TV Sitcom on Television today? This is set-up and designed to get Charlie rich, keep the "Conspiracy Theorists" looking stupid and loony, and FOOL YOU IN THE PROCESS and steer the whole "Truth" Movement away from the truth!

Use your INTUITION, your gut feeling, and please take a look at all the facts before thinking that Charlie Sheen is on YOUR side!

While keeping those facts in mind, please consider the following in context with everything:


Television is the most powerful weapon of psychological warfare in history and yet it is a member of the family in most households. The programming that we are constantly assaulted with conditions us to a particular worldview. This fake reality changes our behavior making us less active and more compliant with society's shortcomings. Since television is controlled by a small handful of powerful corporations, viewers will never witness informing, truthful news and entertainment. As political and corporate power unite at an ever increasing rate, being informed is more important than ever. People need to seek out independent and alternative unbiased sources on the internet for their information or we will continue to be manipulated by the corporate controlled media.

The Art of Corporate Media Mind-Control
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

How Tell-lies-vision Works
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.


"Outfoxed" examines how media empires, led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news. This film provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangers of ever-enlarging corporations taking control of the public's right to know. The film explores Murdoch's burgeoning kingdom and the impact on society when a broad swath of media is controlled by one person. Media experts, including Jeff Cohen (FAIR) Bob McChesney (Free Press), Chellie Pingree (Common Cause), Jeff Chester (Center for Digital Democracy) and David Brock (Media Matters) provide context and guidance for the story of Fox News and its effect on society.

This documentary also reveals the secrets of Former Fox news producers, reporters, bookers and writers who expose what it's like to work for Fox News. These former Fox employees talk about how they were forced to push a "right-wing" point of view or risk their jobs. Some have even chosen to remain anonymous in order to protect their current livelihoods. As one employee said "There's no sense of integrity as far as having a line that can't be crossed."


OutFOXed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism (Pt. 1 of 8)
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.



The truth is here for all who wish to know/have it :)

amethyst
29-12-2009, 10:32 PM
[QUOTE=amethyst;1058510644]

as soon as Sheen spoke out against 911 most people who are not asleep knew these accusations would start,

do you know them personally?

hey and some women can be as nasty as any bloke and tell lies also.

you appear to be not looking at the big picture:(

Not pointing fingers at all. Just sighting that it's a serious charge to bring sworn testimony in court. Denise Richards brought her testimony before Charlie Sheen came out as a truther.After reading what she said, I think she was coming from the standpoint of a concerned mother; concerned for herself as well as her children.

steevo
29-12-2009, 10:39 PM
no doubt.

Steevo; what exactly does footballers making lots of money have to do with 9/11?

Anything? Even remotely?

Well theer are people on here saying that high wages must mean that Sheen is working for the NWO, and if that WERE the case, then it also means that the highest paid football player in Britain is also an agent ?

You asked "do your idiot footballers "speak out" against 9/11?" - The answer is highly likely to be "no", YET they get paid very high wages.

So what I'm saying is, that although everything needs to be taken into account when trying to decide (in your mind) whether Sheen is "controlled opposition", you need to also realise, that you need MORE evidence rather than JUST that he is paid alot of money. If Frank Lampard, suddenly said that 911 was an inside job, you would probably say the same thing, that "Lampard is controlled opposition".

I just dont believe that we are really in a position to say either way what part Sheen is playing EXACTLY, cos we simply dont know, but yes continue to speculate if you like to do that :)

I mentioned footballers, as part of the speculation process.

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 10:46 PM
Well theer are people on here saying that high wages must mean that Sheen is working for the NWO, and if that WERE the case, then it also means that the highest paid football player in Britain is also an agent ?

You asked "do your idiot footballers "speak out" against 9/11?" - The answer is highly likely to be "no", YET they get paid very high wages.

So what I'm saying is, that although everything needs to be taken into account when trying to decide (in your mind) whether Sheen is "controlled opposition", you need to also realise, that you need MORE evidence rather than JUST that he is paid alot of money. If Frank Lampard, suddenly said that 911 was an inside job, you would probably say the same thing, that "Lampard is controlled opposition".

I just dont believe that we are really in a position to say either way what part Sheen is playing EXACTLY, cos we simply dont know, but yes continue to speculate if you like to do that :)

I mentioned footballers, as part of the speculation process.

So.... you have no understanding of Charlie Sheens position on 9/11, and you have no understanding of what really happened on 9/11?

And... as a result.... you're mentioning footballers.

Great.

Well; for a start, you can watch Charlie Sheen question Obama; or you can read the transcript.

And he's talking about "why didn't NORAD intercept" etc etc...

No mention of Hurricane Erin, Dr Judy Wood, fake videos, nothing...

its all bullshit...

do you understand why we call him 'Controlled Opposition'....?

do you understand why Gage, Jones, Griffin, are all 'Controlled Opposition'?

to gauge whether someone is 'controlled opposition' or not.... you have to know what theory they are pushing.

if you don't know anything about what you're talking about then yes, i can see why footballers would be so important in a discussion about Charlie Sheen being controlled opposition.

steevo
29-12-2009, 10:47 PM
So.... you have no understanding of Charlie Sheens position on 9/11, and you have no understanding of what really happened on 9/11?

And... as a result.... you're mentioning footballers.

Great.

Well; for a start, you can watch Charlie Sheen question Obama; or you can read the transcript.

And he's talking about "why didn't NORAD intercept" etc etc...

No mention of Hurricane Erin, Dr Judy Wood, fake videos, nothing...

its all bullshit...

do you understand why we call him 'Controlled Opposition'....?

do you understand why Gage, Jones, Griffin, are all 'Controlled Opposition'?

to gauge whether someone is 'controlled opposition' or not.... you have to know what theory they are pushing.

if you don't know anything about what you're talking about then yes, i can see why footballers would be so important in a discussion about Charlie Sheen being controlled opposition.


I know about Charlie Sheen, so that is why I mentioned the footballers. What's up ?

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 10:52 PM
Charlie Sheen is a footballer?

steevo
29-12-2009, 10:54 PM
Charlie Sheen is a footballer?

Is he ?

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 10:54 PM
Well theer are people on here saying that high wages must mean that Sheen is working for the NWO, and if that WERE the case, then it also means that the highest paid football player in Britain is also an agent ?

Nobody is saying this.

Its Charlie Sheens involvement with '9/11 truth' and the fact that he's basically the highest paid sitcom ACTOR.

Again.... I dont understand the footballer argument....

Unless you know a high-profile footballer who's going around doing half-ass interviews about 9/11 then no, there is no relation to football whatsoever.

steevo
29-12-2009, 10:55 PM
Nobody is saying this.

Its Charlie Sheens involvement with '9/11 truth' and the fact that he's basically the highest paid sitcom ACTOR.

Again.... I dont understand the footballer argument....

Unless you know a high-profile footballer who's going around doing half-ass interviews about 9/11 then no, there is no relation to football whatsoever.

Do you really wanna continue this discussion with me ? Or shall we just stop now lol :D

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 10:57 PM
[QUOTE=lightgiver;1058510686]

Not pointing fingers at all. Just sighting that it's a serious charge to bring sworn testimony in court. Denise Richards brought her testimony before Charlie Sheen came out as a truther.After reading what she said, I think she was coming from the standpoint of a concerned mother; concerned for herself as well as her children.

what you think women do not lies or something,come on amethyst take the blinkers off :rolleyes:

I thought you would know better.

yeah the American government tells the truth:rolleyes:

I have had lies told about me many times,so others can look good.

concerned mother flaunting herself all over the TV,great role model for her children

did you watch the vids or what

Hey thats holly wood for ya.

spawns of Satan.

1776
29-12-2009, 11:02 PM
Well theer are people on here saying that high wages must mean that Sheen is working for the NWO, and if that WERE the case, then it also means that the highest paid football player in Britain is also an agent ?

<SNIP>

No, it doesn't mean that the highest paid football player must also be an agent.

Again, you're taking everything out of context and using it to suit your end conclusion, that Sheen is not controlled opposition. This is commonly known as a 'red herring argument', and won't fool those who know here on this forum.

Source: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html

A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:

1. Topic A is under discussion.
2. Topic B is introduced under the guise of being relevant to topic A (when topic B is actually not relevant to topic A).
3. Topic A is abandoned.

Taken in context, we have all seen the facts surrounding Charlie Sheen and his supposed positions/stance on 9/11 and the "Truth" Movement.

Here's another angle to consider:

Do you think, with his $825,000 earnings per episode (also the OWNER of the show) he will fund an independent investigation into the 9/11 false flag attack on New York City that day?

Answer that one for yourselves.

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 11:04 PM
Do you really wanna continue this discussion with me ? Or shall we just stop now lol :D

Well you brought up the footballers...

Im just confused here...

Can't understand how some random footballers that haven't even heard of 9/11 can possibly be controlled opposition...

Why are you bringing it up if you dont want to discuss it?

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:05 PM
Shut up about footballers and their lackey fans.

Braindead chumps:mad:

montag
29-12-2009, 11:07 PM
How do you know?



Same as you, the internet told me..

steevo
29-12-2009, 11:07 PM
1776, I wasnt trying to introduce a red herring, but I was exposing YOUR red herring (if indeed that was YOUR agenda ?). Either way, I dont have an agenda here myself. We can just agree to disagree if you want ? We all have different opinions/perspectives on this Sheen thing, simply because we REALLY can only speculate right now. I dont mind that you think that Sheen is an agent (or whatever) - And I'm sure that you dont mind thatI DONT think that he is an agent (or whatever). So we are all friends again :)

heartysoup
29-12-2009, 11:08 PM
Source: http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-herring.html

A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:

1. Topic A is under discussion.
2. Topic B is introduced under the guise of being relevant to topic A (when topic B is actually not relevant to topic A).
3. Topic A is abandoned.

good one.
sometimes the stupidity of a red-herring argument can be appealing.
:p

kasalt
29-12-2009, 11:08 PM
The Jesuits did it.

amethyst
29-12-2009, 11:08 PM
[QUOTE=amethyst;1058510705]

what you think women do not lies or something,come on amethyst take the blinkers off :rolleyes:

I thought you would know better.

yeah the American government tells the truth:rolleyes:

I have had lies told about me many times,so others can look good.

concerned mother flaunting herself all over the TV,great role model for her children

did you watch the vids or what

Hey thats holly wood for ya.

spawns of Satan.

A hollywood ex-starlet can't be a concerned mother???? :confused: Just because she was in videos doesn't mean she can't have concern for the welfare of her children. I think you need to take the blinders off, cuz all you see is some truther being smeared, and not the whole picture IMO. But of course, you are entitled to your opinion.

1776
29-12-2009, 11:12 PM
1776, I wasnt trying to introduce a red herring, but I was exposing YOUR red herring (if indeed that was YOUR agenda ?). Either way, I dont have an agenda here myself. We can just agree to disagree if you want ? We all have different opinions/perspectives on this Sheen thing, simply because we REALLY can only speculate right now. I dont mind that you think that Sheen is an agent (or whatever) - And I'm sure that you dont mind thatI DONT think that he is an agent (or whatever). So we are all friends again :)

Sure, all is well, no worries, friend :) This isn't the point, though!

I would love for everyone to see the truth for what it is, the good, the bad AND the ugly! Facts are facts, and you still haven't answered my question(s).

Do you honestly think that Sheen would use some of his earnings, $825,000 per episode (and he's the OWNER of the show), to open an independent investigation into the attacks of 9/11?

Really, because he certainly could with what he's worth!

But he won't, because that would counter the agenda at work, of which he is, but, only a small part of!

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:14 PM
[QUOTE=lightgiver;1058510766]

A hollywood ex-starlet can't be a concerned mother???? :confused: Just because she was in videos doesn't mean she can't have concern for the welfare of her children. I think you need to take the blinders off, cuz all you see is some truther being smeared, and not the whole picture IMO. But of course, you are entitled to your opinion.

How do you know was you there :confused:

really how do you know?do you know Miss Richards personally?

you think all women are angels, children are always used as pawns.


yes a lot of smears especially false flags on your own territory:rolleyes:

wake up and smell the coffee

zarah
29-12-2009, 11:15 PM
Sure, all is well, no worries, friend :) This isn't the point, though!

I would love for everyone to see the truth for what it is, the good, the bad AND the ugly! Facts are facts, and you still haven't answered my question(s).

Do you honestly think that Sheen would use some of his earnings, $825,000 per episode (and he's the OWNER of the show), to open an independent investigation into the attacks of 9/11?

Really, because he certainly could with what he's worth!

But he won't, because that would counter the agenda at work, of which he is, but, only a small part of!

That's a really interesting point. Kinda asking him to put his money where his mouth is. But then...why doesn't John Stewart of any of the rest of the high profile wealthy 'truthers'.

montag
29-12-2009, 11:16 PM
[QUOTE=amethyst;1058510800]

How do you know was you there :confused:

really how do you know?do you know Miss Richards personally?


Only as well as you know Charlie Sheen, whats your problem with women anyway?

steevo
29-12-2009, 11:17 PM
Sure, all is well, no worries, friend :) This isn't the point, though!

I would love for everyone to see the truth for what it is, the good, the bad AND the ugly! Facts are facts, and you still haven't answered my question(s).

Do you honestly think that Sheen would use some of his earnings, $825,000 per episode (and he's the OWNER of the show), to open an independent investigation into the attacks of 9/11?

Really, because he certainly could with what he's worth!

But he won't, because that would counter the agenda at work, of which he is, but, only a small part of!

I dont know if he WOULD do that. There is still time for it, and maybe he is doing it behind the scenes. Either way, this TRUTH thing is much bigger than just one person, who incidently is having his name blackened in the mainstream media (rightly or wrongly).
I feel really strongly that people are starving in Africa, but I aint sent them any spare cash that I have. I feel that the Iraq war should be stopped, but I aint sat in Parliament Square with Brian Haw. Sorry if these appear to be like "red herrings", but I dont mean it to seem that way.
I am just really pointing out the "fact" that we dont have any smoking gun AT ALL either way. But like I say, it's ok with me that this speculation goes on, as long as I am allowed to have a little input at times too :)

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:18 PM
Same as you, the internet told me..

No the MSM told you.

I wasn't born yesterday I have seen and experienced violent women,take a walk around British streets at the week end.

you may even see a few shagging in the street.

such is the moral decline of Britain:rolleyes:

British women becoming more violent
August 09, 2008
Subscribe to: RSS, Email

Increasing violence by women, often under the influence of alcohol, is creating a new strain on resources, British police say.

Some 240 women are arrested daily in England and Wales for violent offenses, according to Ministry of Justice statistics reported by The Times of London Saturday. Assaults, robberies and criminal damage offenses involving young women have all increased in the past three years, with the total number of crimes committed by girls aged 10 to 17 in England and Wales now increasing 25 percent to a total 59,000.

"Clearly there is an increase in the number of women who use violence in their everyday life and when they are out drinking on the streets around the country," Paul McKeever, chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales said, suggesting more young women were also joining street gangs. "It's a new phenomenon and it does stretch the resources of the police service."

wake up and smell the coffeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:23 PM
Bruised and battered husbands have been complaining for years and now the biggest research project of its kind has proved them right. When it comes to domestic confrontation, women are more violent than men.

Bruised and battered husbands have been complaining for years and now the biggest research project of its kind has proved them right. When it comes to domestic confrontation, women are more violent than men.:eek:

wake up and smell the Coffeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


The study, which challenges the long-standing view that women are overwhelmingly the victims of aggression, is based on an analysis of 34,000 men and women by a British academic. Women lash out more frequently than their husbands or boyfriends, concludes John Archer, professor of psychology at the University of Central Lancashire and president of the International Society for Research on Aggression.

amethyst
29-12-2009, 11:24 PM
Only as well as you know Charlie Sheen, whats your problem with women anyway?

I was kinda wondering the same thing......

montag
29-12-2009, 11:25 PM
I was kinda wondering the same thing......
I think we just got our answer..:p

1776
29-12-2009, 11:25 PM
I dont know if he WOULD do that. There is still time for it, and maybe he is doing it behind the scenes. Either way, this TRUTH thing is much bigger than just one person, who incidently is having his name blackened in the mainstream media (rightly or wrongly).
I feel really strongly that people are starving in Africa, but I aint sent them any spare cash that I have. I feel that the Iraq war should be stopped, but I aint sat in Parliament Square with Brian Haw. Sorry if these appear to be like "red herrings", but I dont mean it to seem that way.
I am just really pointing out the "fact" that we dont have any smoking gun AT ALL either way. But like I say, it's ok with me that this speculation goes on, as long as I am allowed to have a little input at times too :)

Are you kidding me?

No smoking gun??

THE TV SHOW IS THE SMOKING GUN!!!

Did you just skip over EVERYTHING I provided for sources/references explaining how television controls the minds of the masses and distracts them from what's really happening?? Charlie Sheen has been given this show for this reason, and he's paid quite well for his offering/partaking in it!

Come on, friend, please open your eyes.... the truth is RIGHT HERE but you choose to look at the evidence with worldly glasses!

amethyst
29-12-2009, 11:27 PM
How do you know was you there :confused:

really how do you know?do you know Miss Richards personally?

you think all women are angels, children are always used as pawns.


yes a lot of smears especially false flags on your own territory:rolleyes:

wake up and smell the coffee

Where did I say or imply that all women are angels?

amethyst
29-12-2009, 11:27 PM
I think we just got our answer..:p

lol.....

steevo
29-12-2009, 11:33 PM
Are you kidding me?

No smoking gun??

THE TV SHOW IS THE SMOKING GUN!!!

Did you just skip over EVERYTHING I provided for sources/references explaining how television controls the minds of the masses and distracts them from what's really happening?? Charlie Sheen has been given this show for this reason, and he's paid quite well for his offering/partaking in it!

Come on, friend, please open your eyes.... the truth is RIGHT HERE but you choose to look at the evidence with worldly glasses!

The TV show is the smoking gun because......he gets paid alot ? :confused:

Only if you follow leaders can you be led.

Who in here is following leaders ?

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:39 PM
Where did I say or imply that all women are angels?

On your recent posts

ooo denise she is just trying to protect her kids

but she does not mind starring naked in lesbian films for her kids to see when they get older

Hollywood Babylon

wake up and smell the coffeeeeeeeeeeeeee amethyst.

Charly sheen is being set up by the MSM,anyone is who gets in their way.

poisoned or killed off,your government is EVIL :(

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2432021060416936649#


The study, which challenges the long-standing view that women are overwhelmingly the victims of aggression, is based on an analysis of 34,000 men and women by a British academic. Women lash out more frequently than their husbands or boyfriends, concludes John Archer, professor of psychology at the University of Central Lancashire and president of the International Society for Research on Aggression.

1776
29-12-2009, 11:39 PM
The TV show is the smoking gun because......he gets paid alot ? :confused:

Only if you follow leaders can you be led.

Who in here is following leaders ?

Again, you're not seeing the esoteric structure behind the extoeric operation at hand, television programs and their purpose.

You're free to believe as you will, but just know that all the information shows a very different belief.

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:48 PM
No wonder we are up shit creek:rolleyes:

amethyst
29-12-2009, 11:50 PM
On your recent posts

ooo denise she is just trying to protect her kids

but she does not mind starring naked in lesbian films for her kids to see when they get older

Hollywood Babylon

wake up and smell the coffeeeeeeeeeeeeee amethyst.

Charly sheen is being set up by the MSM,anyone is who gets in their way.

poisoned or killed off,your government is EVIL :(

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2432021060416936649#


.

What does Denise Richard's starring in lesbian films have to do with anything? :confused:

I think it's actually a case of drug addicted hollywood actor who has friends in high places showing his true colors, rather than anyone out to smear Mr. Sheen who just happens to be a "supposed" truther.

It appears Mr. Sheen made problems for himself with wife # 1 and now wife # 2.

steevo
29-12-2009, 11:53 PM
Again, you're not seeing the esoteric structure behind the extoeric operation at hand, television programs and their purpose.

You're free to believe as you will, but just know that all the information shows a very different belief.

I am open minded on all subjects including this one (or I try to be, at least). I am aware of some of the Esoteric knowledge, and I thank you for you information on it. However i do not feel the need to dwell on this subject TOO MUCH right now because, for me, there is not much point at the moment.
I feel that SO FAR the Charlie Sheen (Obama) stunt has helped bring it into the mainstream, and it plants seeds in the heads of people who are FAST "asleep". The seeds are what's needed, even if the PTB are behind it all. I'm sure the PTB have a plan and are following it, but the PTB have to change the plan to suit the mindset of the people. The PTB dont have it ALL their own way, but they DO always have alternative plans, which can fail to an extent, and then they have to go to plan C etc

I just keep an open mind. As soon as I KNOW that someone is disinfo (beyond reasonable doubt) or has suddenly "sold out", then I would be the first to say it on here. But at the moment, I see not smoking gun, just some circumstantial evidence, and some mainstream media discrediting campaign APPARENTLY.

1776
29-12-2009, 11:58 PM
I am open minded on all subjects including this one (or I try to be, at least). I am aware of some of the Esoteric knowledge, and I thank you for you information on it. However i do not feel the need to dwell on this subject TOO MUCH right now because, for me, there is not much point at the moment.
I feel that SO FAR the Charlie Sheen (Obama) stunt has helped bring it into the mainstream, and it plants seeds in the heads of people who are FAST "asleep". The seeds are what's needed, even if the PTB are behind it all. I'm sure the PTB have a plan and are following it, but the PTB have to change the plan to suit the mindset of the people. The PTB dont have it ALL their own way, but they DO always have alternative plans, which can fail to an extent, and then they have to go to plan C etc

I just keep an open mind. As soon as I KNOW that someone is disinfo (beyond reasonable doubt) or has suddenly "sold out", then I would be the first to say it on here. But at the moment, I see not smoking gun, just some circumstantial evidence, and some mainstream media discrediting campaign APPARENTLY.

What would be your smoking gun?

Do you literally need someone to stand in front of you with a neon yellow blinking sign that says "Charlie Sheen owns the show 'Two and a Half Men' and makes a sick amount of money from it because he follows the beliefs of the Baphomet worship. The Satanists in Hollywood pay him well because he plays the cards he has been initiated to play out."?

The evidence shows this, but you need someone to come out and announce it on the Television, perhaps?

Have you researched Hollywood, and the actors/actressess involved and the parts they play? I'd wager a guess that you have not? Is this a fair assumption?

lightgiver
29-12-2009, 11:59 PM
What does Denise Richard's starring in lesbian films have to do with anything? :confused:

I think it's actually a case of drug addicted hollywood actor who has friends in high places showing his true colors, rather than anyone out to smear Mr. Sheen who just happens to be a "supposed" truther.

It appears Mr. Sheen made problems for himself with wife # 1 and now wife # 2.

hey up a minute you believe her and not mr sheen .

and she is sooooooo believable:rolleyes:

what can he not choose who he wants to be with, maybe he left her because of her roles in those sleazy films eh:rolleyes:I know I would have.


amethyst I feel you need to go on the have laugh section.

maybe you should be questioning 911 more instead of getting involved in domestic disputes,

I mean after all your government carried out the mass murder of thousands of peope and the all the wars since.:rolleyes:

here is reminder just in case you forgot

Rockefeller Reveals 9/11 FRAUD to Aaron Russo - YouTube

amethyst
30-12-2009, 12:03 AM
hey up a minute you believe her and not mr sheen .

and she is sooooooo believable:rolleyes:

what can he not choose who he wants to be with, maybe he left her because of her roles in those sleazy films eh:rolleyes:I know I would have.


amethyst I feel you need to go on the have laugh section.

maybe you should be questioning 911 more instead of getting involved in domestic disputes,

I mean after all your government carried out the mass murder of thousands of peope and the all the wars since.:rolleyes:

here is reminder just in case you forgot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA

I am laughing......because you are missing my points completely.....

I believe Mr. Russo.....

But Mr. Sheen is another story all together.....

steevo
30-12-2009, 12:07 AM
What would be your smoking gun?

Do you literally need someone to stand in front of you with a neon yellow blinking sign that says "Charlie Sheen owns the show 'Two and a Half Men' and makes a sick amount of money from it because he follows the beliefs of the Baphomet worship. The Satanists in Hollywood pay him well because he plays the cards he has been initiated to play out."?

The evidence shows this, but you need someone to come out and announce it on the Television, perhaps?

Have you researched Hollywood, and the actors/actressess involved and the parts they play? I'd wager a guess that you have not? Is this a fair assumption?

Not sure if it is "fair", but it's definitely an "assumption".

The smoking gun ? Well if I found one RIGHT NOW, what would it achieve anyway, unless it could be exposed to the masses ?
You say that you have found a smoking gun but I dont see it as one. I see "evidence", but only circumstantial. All info that I read (including your info) goes into my head SOMEWHERE, and when/if the time comes, then those seeds will sprout. And if the worst came to the worst and Sheen was a shill, then I would know not to START following him - I dont FOLLOW anyway, so it makes no difference to me. I just observe, and learn (hopefully). If ever I was mistaken, I would quickly tell people that I got it wrong (unless my ego stops me). But anyway, I would always say not to follow people.

lightgiver
30-12-2009, 12:13 AM
I am laughing......because you are missing my points completely.....

I believe Mr. Russo.....

But Mr. Sheen is another story all together.....

and you would know because the MSM tells you so :rolleyes:

Innocent until proven guilty,but it appears these days it appears to be guilty until proven innocent especially by gossipy women,

wake up and smell the cofeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

maybe you need to spend more energy in exposing the lies of 911,I miss no points dear.

I wonder about some so called Spiritual people on here,

casting stones and the like:rolleyes:

and you lot have the stones at the ready

maybe you did a couple of thousand years ago and you are all here re paying your karma.

Its called collective karma and its ripening big time.

Les Dawson - Cissie & Ada - New Neighbours - YouTube

Les Dawson - Cissie & Ada - New Neighbours (gossipy women)

matrix911
30-12-2009, 12:51 AM
1776... first off, i'm curious... who in your opinion is not controlled opposition thats a public figure?

Jesse "The Body" Ventura has big balls? You don't think his TV show is doing exactly what the Occult Agenda wants? It's INDOCTRINATING everyone into the "Conspiracy Theory" world,

what do you mean by conspiracy theory?

what part of what he's investigating and exposing is JUST a THEORY? Much of what he's exposing is now based on conspiracy FACT right?

So how does his show MISLEAD or DECEIVE? In this case, How does his show serve the PTB PERPS and Illuminati?

His show IS BY DESIGN "introducing" the ROBOTS and the unenlightened, to the greatest conspiracy of all time which will be very shocking and uncomfortable to their egos. MOST of the viewers are NEW to the facts of the 9/11 conspiracy and are among the types who don't know that WTC7 collapsed.

So considering this is a FIRST really, for mainstream TV, he and the shows producers have to be able to create a proper balance as not to alienate its audience and keep their attention in the world where peoples attention span is used to quick sound bytes, i'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt in this case.
Now of course I'd prefer an even more aggressive and intense detailed investigation, but considering the challenge they're up against, sorry, but I think they accomplished more than i ever imagined would ever even make it to the MSM and have to give them credit.

In this case whether or not they're what you feel is controlled opp, they exposed and addressed more issues on the MSM than has ever been previously done. Just the fact they repeatedly showed WTC7 fall is something i thought i'd never see on any such national show.

I just can't see how such a show with all they've exposed, would serve the perps/ptb in any way.

This is technically the FIRST time such a show has ever been aired in this manner showing what it showed which will AWAKEN MANY to at least facts and issues that they and most have previously NEVER SEEN nor would have ever seen other than a few clips and cut-off soundbytes out of context ridiculing the speakers such as been done by fox news etc. Now thats controlled opposition imo.


but of course just touching the surface as Alex does on his show. Jesse Ventura still thinks that Obama needs more time before we criticize him after saying that Obama "is already fudging up" in the Obama Deception that Alex produced earlier this year which is completely contradictory, thus a big fat lie!


there's probably alot that JV isn't aware of or perhaps the NO PLANES issue is too controversial to get into YET and wanted to lay out the clearest and most mainstream friendly details to lay a FOUNDATION or INTRODUCTION thats middle of the road and not to extreme or obscure.

Do i think there are TONS of other aspects that might be more important to investigate, focus on or incorportate into the show??? OF COURSE... but I'm willing to accept they probably had to keep within a certain structure and format to appease the higher ups in order to even get them to allow the show to AIR.

While i think you think i underestimate, I think you over-estimate the power of the PTB in certain cases that may have fallen through the cracks and missed.

If you think there is no OPPOSITION to the PTB in that world, you are mistaken. They may be powerful, but there are other FORCES at work against them.


You can choose to be deceived willingly, that's up to you.....

deceived about what exactly? that exposing WTC7 or that the BLACK BOXES weren't found which is ludicrous and there was explosives found in the dust etc to the SHEEP/robots is a LIE and BAD for the TM? Or GOOD for the GOVT PERPS AND MSM?

I never expected his show or all that he claims to want to expose to be anything more than a joke like most others have been. This show took things to a higher level and WENT THERE.

so whether or not he's being used as controlled opp is irrelevant because it took a first step after 8 years and broke ground albeit a BABY STEP to those of us who KNOW MUCH MORE.

THIS SHOW PLANTED SOME BIG SEEDS or RED PILLS and glitches in the mass consciousness of the MATRIX.

If this is what you call controlled opposition and you think its a bad thing in this particular case, then i'm not sure what you suggest would be a good thing in reaching people in MASS; which is really the ONLY way things will ever have a chance to change in this fucked up world with the reptilian Nwo Illuminati PTB perps.

I'd be shitting my pants if i were them... you're implying they WANT this to happen and want WTC7 to be shown to the world after trying to cover it up for so long.

you're kidding right?


I'll stick to the facts, because the facts are right there for all who wish to know them. I can't just say to myself "well he's talking about 9/11, so he must be a good guy on our side...." No, sorry, it's much more than that... there's forces at work here far scarier than most can imagine. Jesse Ventura is FRIENDS with many of the leaders who have been pushing this GLOBAL WARMING bullshit from the late 60's - early 70's, admitted in his own words (Al Gore, Maurice Strong, and others) Keep believing this rubbish all you wish, but don't say you weren't forewarned here on the David Icke forum board!

I promise you I know about the FORCES you're talking about more than you realize.

I believe MJs downfall and death to be more than coincidence as it relates to the ptb/illuminati. I believe TIGER may also be a victim and many others. I believe OBAMA is a puppet and being used as a tool for forces most cannot fathom. YES WE CAN and the revelation of that slogan as it relates to satanism was not something I think he's consciously aware of... but who knows. Also The number 11 connections that occurred on 9/11 along with the predictions did not originate on the physical realm imo. Some maybe, but not all. and Perhaps the date in the matrix was in fact intentionally put there, but we'll never know for sure.

But still, those things are somewhat different than the issue we're talking about.

you're definitely are among the few who I'd say are not veiled and its nice to see you're able to see the truth between the lines... We're discussing things and bouncing new ideas or ways of thinking about things.

but don't for one minute think you're the only one that understands or can see these forces are REAL.


There are MANY wolves in sheeps clothing today!!

so a question for you... do you remember who was also known as the LAMB 1776?

revolutionary_jam
30-12-2009, 12:56 AM
He should learn about freeman on the land then

boots
30-12-2009, 05:13 AM
I'm sorry boots, but getting pissed and abusing your wife is a big deal in my book, In fact according to his wifes 911 call he put a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her. Charlie Sheen may be awake to the NWO but he's also obviously a fuckwit..

Yes it is montag, It was the wrong thing to say considering what he did do or didn't?

Who really knows the truth?, Yes he has a past history of domestic violence but each case must be taken on it's merit. The guy would be targeted by the PTB. Devices could have been used on him to send him over the edge even more. He is a big fish on the TV screen, one they would love to fry.

Most of these actors in hellywood are abusers of some kind. Why target him?

.

1776
30-12-2009, 05:27 AM
Yes it is montag, It was the wrong thing to say considering what he did do or didn't?

Who really knows the truth?, Yes he has a past history of domestic violence but each case must be taken on it's merit. The guy would be targeted by the PTB. Devices could have been used on him to send him over the edge even more. He is a big fish on the TV screen, one they would love to fry.

Most of these actors in hellywood are abusers of some kind. Why target him?

.

He's a face in Hollywood, he wasn't targeted. He assaulted his wife, and he is the highest paid actor with a TV sitcom right now, of course it will be make news headlines! He brought this on himself, and by design, I might add.

Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition, as I have outlined earlier.

Check out the following and ask yourself why they'd give him the highest paid spot on TV in regards to sitcoms (he also OWNS the damn show!):

http://popwatch.ew.com/2008/08/05/charlie-sheen-h/

According to TV Guide, Charlie Sheen is TV’s highest paid actor, taking home an estimated $825,000 an episode for his work on TV’s top sitcom, CBS’ Two and a Half Men.

You'd think he'd be able to start his own independent investigation into the events of 9/11 with what he's worth, no?

:p

Of course that will never happen, because that goes against the Oath!

boots
30-12-2009, 05:50 AM
Not only that, but Charlie Sheen's previous wife Denise Richard's who had two little girls with him, also detailed a seriously screwed up relationship with him, accusing him of supposedly viewing child pornography. Which doesn't make for the greatest role model for the truth movement:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421061sheen1.html

I think he could fit in the "controlled opposition" category.

She was just as unstable as him, if not more so.

That site and the text messages only showed one side of the story not her responding text messages either.

Controlled opposition? or cointelpro?

.

boots
30-12-2009, 05:59 AM
He's a face in Hollywood, he wasn't targeted. He assaulted his wife, and he is the highest paid actor with a TV sitcom right now, of course it will be make news headlines! He brought this on himself, and by design, I might add.

Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition, as I have outlined earlier.

Check out the following and ask yourself why they'd give him the highest paid spot on TV in regards to sitcoms (he also OWNS the damn show!):

http://popwatch.ew.com/2008/08/05/charlie-sheen-h/



You'd think he'd be able to start his own independent investigation into the events of 9/11 with what he's worth, no?

:p

Of course that will never happen, because that goes against the Oath!


All that money goes into houses, cars, lawyer's fee's, alimony, etc

The actors in FRIENDS were paid 1 million an episode.

Or is plain old cointelpro.

1776
30-12-2009, 06:22 AM
All that money goes into houses, cars, lawyer's fee's, alimony, etc

The actors in FRIENDS were paid 1 million an episode.

Or is plain old cointelpro.

You're deflecting.... as has anyone here in this thread when debating for Charlie Sheen, defending his image.

He has enough money to personally back an independent investigation into 9/11, but he would never do that!

If he were as outspoken as he purports himself to be, don't you think he would do something along those lines to help uncover the truth? I know I would if I had 1/10th of the financial wealth and liquidity that Charlie has!

Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition and this is all done by design. There is method to this madness, as there is always: To make the other side (the "Truthers") look crazy & appear to only prop up crazies and criminals as their "Leaders" and spokespeople.

Sheen is not being targeted here, either. He is a high-profile actor in Hollywood with a track record of assaulting women, a womanizer one might argue. So for this to make news headlines, isn't out of the ordinary at all. In fact, I would be surprised if this didn't make major news headlines all over!

I won't even get into his families ties with the Jesuit Order and the Papacy in Rome... that's but another thread altogether!

Without using a red-herring or straw man argument, I'd ask you to respond boots.

boots
30-12-2009, 07:20 AM
Dude.

Something like 50% of Americans thought the 911 attacks were suspicions way back in 2002.

People will see Charlie Sheen for what he is. They aren't that stupid to think he is the champion of the 911 truth movement.

.

1776
30-12-2009, 07:44 AM
Dude.

Something like 50% of Americans thought the 911 attacks were suspicions way back in 2002.

People will see Charlie Sheen for what he is. They aren't that stupid to think he is the champion of the 911 truth movement.

.

You don't even see Charlie Sheen for what he truly is, so how would I expect sheeple watching on television to?

graflok
30-12-2009, 04:32 PM
Dude.

Something like 50% of Americans thought the 911 attacks were suspicions way back in 2002.

People will see Charlie Sheen for what he is. They aren't that stupid to think he is the champion of the 911 truth movement.

.

Boots, you missed a great career as a comedy writer. :D

graflok
30-12-2009, 04:33 PM
Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition and this is all done by design.



Exactly.

steevo
30-12-2009, 05:19 PM
Exactly.

No-one is disputing that it is a POSSIBILITY - It's the EVIDENCE that you put forward that is lacking somewhat.

1776
30-12-2009, 05:51 PM
No-one is disputing that it is a POSSIBILITY - It's the EVIDENCE that you put forward that is lacking somewhat.

1) It's proven that television is used as a form of psychological warfare (PsyOps) and Mind Control.

2) Charlie Sheen earns about $825,000 per episode and is the owner of the show 'Two and a Half Men', a popular television comedy program.

3) Hollywood is owned and operated by Zionists, controlled by the long arm of the Papacy in Rome (relevant because of family ties with Martin Sheen), and Charlie is allowed to be the highest paid actor with a TV Sitcom today (and OWNS the show, himself = more revenue).

4) Controlled Opposition is about as classic as it gets when reviewing the 3 points above to discredit a "Truth"/"Grass" Movement.


It doesn't take a whole lot more to connect the dots. Charlie Sheen, with the endorsement of Alex Jones, came out with his satire of '20 minutes with The President (Obama)' trying to make it look like a REAL INTERVIEW THAT HAPPENED and his avid followers RAN WITH IT all over the net for weeks! Charlie has only shown us that he is not genuine, and used to discredit all "Conspiracy Theories" out there today. He's a womanizer, and has a track record for abusing women (his wife, as well).


Use your own mind, and put these things together. HE OWNS A TELEVISION PROGRAM, and is the HIGHEST PAID ACTOR on said television program owned by Zionist controlled, Vatican Obedient, Hollywood!

They don't give you this type of status/ownership in Hollywood without the Oath. Sorry, just doesn't happen! Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition!

lightgiver
30-12-2009, 07:02 PM
Exactly.

BULLSHIT :mad:

HELL WOOD,

massive cover up and some on here cannot stand high profile people spilling the beans,

the American Government are worse than the DEVIL

America is a Satanic country.

steevo
30-12-2009, 07:50 PM
1) It's proven that television is used as a form of psychological warfare (PsyOps) and Mind Control.

2) Charlie Sheen earns about $825,000 per episode and is the owner of the show 'Two and a Half Men', a popular television comedy program.

3) Hollywood is owned and operated by Zionists, controlled by the long arm of the Papacy in Rome (relevant because of family ties with Martin Sheen), and Charlie is allowed to be the highest paid actor with a TV Sitcom today (and OWNS the show, himself = more revenue).

4) Controlled Opposition is about as classic as it gets when reviewing the 3 points above to discredit a "Truth"/"Grass" Movement.


It doesn't take a whole lot more to connect the dots. Charlie Sheen, with the endorsement of Alex Jones, came out with his satire of '20 minutes with The President (Obama)' trying to make it look like a REAL INTERVIEW THAT HAPPENED and his avid followers RAN WITH IT all over the net for weeks! Charlie has only shown us that he is not genuine, and used to discredit all "Conspiracy Theories" out there today. He's a womanizer, and has a track record for abusing women (his wife, as well).


Use your own mind, and put these things together. HE OWNS A TELEVISION PROGRAM, and is the HIGHEST PAID ACTOR on said television program owned by Zionist controlled, Vatican Obedient, Hollywood!

They don't give you this type of status/ownership in Hollywood without the Oath. Sorry, just doesn't happen! Charlie Sheen is controlled opposition!

The Obama "interview" did it's job in planting seeds.

Your evidence is only circumstantial at best.

Come back when more evidence is available.

1776
30-12-2009, 11:12 PM
The Obama "interview" did it's job in planting seeds.

Your evidence is only circumstantial at best.

Come back when more evidence is available.

:p

Okay, keep your "worldly" shades over your eyes! That is your choice!

graflok
30-12-2009, 11:19 PM
No-one is disputing that it is a POSSIBILITY - It's the EVIDENCE that you put forward that is lacking somewhat.

Evidence of what? And, why would I want to "put it forward"?

I replied directly to another person's comments. It had nothing to do with you.

I'm not a lawyer or politician or salesman. Why would I want to convince you
of anything?

Believe what you like. You shouldn't need my approval nor care if I disagree
with you.

graflok
30-12-2009, 11:52 PM
The Obama "interview" did it's job in planting seeds.

Your evidence is only circumstantial at best.

Come back when more evidence is available.

Come back when you have better manners, steevo. Who gave you the
job of telling people to leave my thread?

This thread was not intended to be a "debate" (I know that's hard for many
here to understand) where everyone has to "prove" every opinion they hold.
Believe it or not it's possible to communicate without turning every
conversation into a trial.

Debates are psychotic pissing contests fought by morons. Why do it?

steevo
31-12-2009, 12:40 AM
Come back when you have better manners, steevo. Who gave you the
job of telling people to leave my thread?

This thread was not intended to be a "debate" (I know that's hard for many
here to understand) where everyone has to "prove" every opinion they hold.
Believe it or not it's possible to communicate without turning every
conversation into a trial.

Debates are psychotic pissing contests fought by morons. Why do it?

Good point! :)

Btw I was telling anyone to LEAVE the thread. I didnt mean it THAT way.

revolutionary_jam
31-12-2009, 01:07 AM
people who always appear to be very nice are often overcompensating for dark traits they are trying to hide

graflok
31-12-2009, 04:14 AM
people who always appear to be very nice are often overcompensating for dark traits they are trying to hide

People who always state stupid generalities about others are often overcompensating
for having bad breath and hardly any friends.

trev1
01-01-2010, 10:41 PM
I see Coast To Coast AM made a big deal of this in their news item
section. Kinda really made it look like Sheen was a fool. Although I
love the show sometimes I wonder about which side these guys are
on. After all it was only the week before they had Alex Jones on talking
about the New World Order so :rolleyes:

vetis
01-01-2010, 11:51 PM
according to http://television.aol.com/photos/tv-star-salaries

sheen gets about 7.7 million a year but this only puts him in 9th place
James Gandolfini was getting a million an episode for example.
hugh laurie as just an actor gets 400k for each house episode - if he owned it? well, a lot more than sheen.
when friends was big they were getting more than sheen

His yearly take is not abnormal at all it seems.

lightgiver
02-01-2010, 12:10 AM
I see Coast To Coast AM made a big deal of this in their news item
section. Kinda really made it look like Sheen was a fool. Although I
love the show sometimes I wonder about which side these guys are
on. After all it was only the week before they had Alex Jones on talking
about the New World Order so :rolleyes:

The conspiracy truth movement is a joke,a product of tavistock to keep everyone going around in circles,

they wanted people to find out about 911,all part of the show.:)

just more bread and circus to divide and rule.

1776
02-01-2010, 01:57 AM
The conspiracy truth movement is a joke,a product of tavistock to keep everyone going around in circles,

they wanted people to find out about 911,all part of the show.:)

just more bread and circus to divide and rule.

This is very true..... to a degree... :)

cstewart1987
02-01-2010, 03:57 AM
according to http://television.aol.com/photos/tv-star-salaries

sheen gets about 7.7 million a year but this only puts him in 9th place
James Gandolfini was getting a million an episode for example.
hugh laurie as just an actor gets 400k for each house episode - if he owned it? well, a lot more than sheen.
when friends was big they were getting more than sheen

His yearly take is not abnormal at all it seems.


lol not abnormal..

1776
02-01-2010, 10:17 AM
lol not abnormal..

Right???

He owns one of the most popular, highest grossing, TV sitcoms on television today, but it's "not abnormal" at all..... :p

Funny stuff, what people will say to prove their points!

tusme
02-01-2010, 10:41 AM
tbh, sounds liek a set/frame up.
Hmm, inside job!! :rolleyes: ...bad energy about these days... :(

lightgiver
02-01-2010, 09:26 PM
Con............................................... ......spiracy

and the con is on us lot,no matter who it is.;)

think for yourself and stay away from the herds,no matter who it is.