Why is GB always on the side of the USA?

[tiswas]

Have you noticed during this bullying war against Iraq and Afganistan, the British unfortunately have blindly been following the lead of the USA.
France on the other hand, did have the balls to tell POTUS what they thought, and the result was the pathetically renamed freedom fries.

By the way, the USA still thinks of Russia as a real threat.

[revolutionary_jam]

"lap dog" but perhaps in secret the orders go the other way...

[baron von lotsov]

No it does not, America always sides with Britain. You have been lied to once again, so once you get it the right way round we can then answer the question, which happens to have a reasonable and straightforward answer.

Did they teach you history at school? Did you know Britain has what is called a commonwealth? Indeed it is the same deal now only that commonwealth has swallowed up almost the entire world and is far far bigger than America and far richer. It's like the American military is an extension of the British army.

[i_am]

They are all on the one side, always have been and the politicians are merely puppets.

They take it in turns to be good cop/bad cop to keep the public in general from realising that the agenda is marching, nay, at this point in time, running on

[ennui]

I was listening to Dwight Schultz's podcast the other day and he mentioned that the US is Britain's faithful lapdog. I found that interesting because as a Brit I'd always viewed it as being the other way round with the BBC especially calling Tony Blair Bush's poddle, so it got me thinking. All the UK press go on and on about the UK obediently following the US around, but I suspect Blairs clout in Washington was bigger than portrayed. Britain is also a valuable bridge between the US and Europe.

[baron von lotsov]

I was listening to Dwight Schultz's podcast the other day and he mentioned that the US is Britain's faithful lapdog. I found that interesting because as a Brit I'd always viewed it as being the other way round with the BBC especially calling Tony Blair Bush's poddle, so it got me thinking. All the UK press go on and on about the UK obediently following the US around, but I suspect Blairs clout in Washington was bigger than portrayed. Britain is also a valuable bridge between the US and Europe.


Yes except Blair was just a messenger too. The people who he was sending the message from were the ones with the clout. The RIIA, the various aristocratic London clubs connected to royalty with only a handful of members who you never see, those would be the ones who ordered it. Actually Blair is quite low down in the pecking order, he would not have membership. Did you see what happened at the Queen Mother's funeral? Blair thought he was going to be invited but it was a case of him punching above his weight, to them he is just like a pageboy.

[positive terror]

Because both are governed by the masons and the illuminati?

[baron von lotsov]

Yes and the masons are connected to royalty. There are many different names they call themselves. Illuminati is one but also some think of themselves as Olympians. Seriously, like the Greek gods up on Mount Olympus!

[freedomnonfighter]

They aren't countries, they're big corporations, literally.
And they're all owned by the samt lot...

http://notachessboard.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/freedom.jpg

But wow... I totally forgot about that crap. OMG.