View Full Version : USA elections - does anyone believe
tiswas
15-09-2007, 08:13 AM
that Hillary Clinton has a chance? Personally I do not.
the reason is that the illumanti will cook some terror attack for a Republican victory.:mad:
Like it or not folks, all this talk about China, Russia, India and the EU becoming more powerful/richer than America is really a pipe dream.
America will try to cause a war with Iran or Pakistan, but they somewhat never pick on a nation that is strong. I remember one of the 'democrats' wanting to bomb Pakistan just to kill Osama, this nation folks is still very dangerous.
that Hillary Clinton has a chance? Personally I do not.
the reason is that the illumanti will cook some terror attack for a Republican victory.:mad:
If 'they' have decided she will win, then win she will :cool:
It matters not which party gets in, the agenda will still be the same.
graflok
15-09-2007, 01:22 PM
There may not be any more elections in the USA.
If Bush invokes his martial law plan, the constitution (what's left of it) will be
history and Bush can appoint himself "King of the North American Union" from
there on out.
I've lost all hope in actually taking an election seriously. Although what is interesting now is too look at who DOES win, and do research on them to find out why they won. Like I am said, the agenda will be the same.
Hillary scares me
freedomnonfighter
15-09-2007, 08:59 PM
It's not that anyone has a 'chance' - is that there is no chance involved whatsoever.
All those tools like Mitt Romney are just in 'the race' to get people all fevered up and discussing and fighting with each other about non-issues. They are there 'to lose' from the beginning. They are there solely to preserve and maintain the illusion of bipartisanship - Republicrat and Democan. Divide and Rule.
I believe the outcome of the Selections will be of two possibilities:
1) Hillary Clinton becomes Puppet of the US.
2) Bush uses all the laws he's passed that make him Dictator through "Federal Emergency" declaration - ie False-Flap Op + Martial Law
But of course the latter might be saved for the next puppet, but I think that's way too far off for their crunch time.
gorana
15-09-2007, 09:12 PM
Imagine following... hmm... better the other way around :)
Hill's husband was impeached, right? :) So maybe they will play same game with her. but a bit more rougher :)
USA had a rep prezz for 8 years and before that it was Clinton and before that it was rep prezz again. I think they will put Hillary and let everything crash on her head, so that they claim that democrats are not able to lead USA to NWO. They will then claim that USA needs tough prezz, a ruler, someone who can lead the land like noone has before. and there we have our NWO final strike.
G.
adzboarder
16-09-2007, 10:22 PM
With regards to Hillary, about a year ago I took a visit to several bookmakers in my home town to place a bet on Hillary to win the 2008 US election.
In all three places they had to make some calls and see what the odds are. For all of them they offered me odds of 2-1.
So I asked the bloke at William Hill if this was a dead cert then and he said he thought it was highly likely, obvious even.
OBVIOUS!?
If bookmakers know the deal then it adds weight to the dead cert that she will become president.
It makes sense though in the life-movie that we are shown on the mass media, everyone in the US will say stuff like oh its so great, so refreshing to have the first female president and how wonderful it all is but as we all know the neo-con agenda will continue regardless so it matters not which puppet they put in the oval office, but you can imagine the mindfuck it will have on people, they will totally miss the point!
adimon
16-09-2007, 11:03 PM
So I asked the bloke at William Hill if this was a dead cert then and he said he thought it was highly likely, obvious even.
Hey adzboarder
I'm willing to bet she doesn't win. Fancy a gentleman's wager?
Personally, I don't think the election is a foregone conclusion. I realise this is a minority view, but hey!
I'm therefore quite excited about the whole thing. Hillary I think will win the Democrat nomination. Still not sure about whether it will be Giuliani or Romney.
I think the Republicans will win.
Paul will lose the Rep nomination and then stand as the 3rd candidate, much as Nader did.
If I had to go out on a limb, I think it will be Romney.
abrilliantone
17-09-2007, 12:14 AM
Wasn't it said that hillary was also a shape-shifter and that bill was only controled by a rep. :confused:
abrilliantone
17-09-2007, 12:21 AM
Also sense it is known that the candidate with the most "royal blood" in them wins the election. Well who has the most "royal blood" in them?
adzboarder
17-09-2007, 01:43 AM
Hey adzboarder
I'm willing to bet she doesn't win. Fancy a gentleman's wager?
Personally, I don't think the election is a foregone conclusion. I realise this is a minority view, but hey!
I'm therefore quite excited about the whole thing. Hillary I think will win the Democrat nomination. Still not sure about whether it will be Giuliani or Romney.
I think the Republicans will win.
Paul will lose the Rep nomination and then stand as the 3rd candidate, much as Nader did.
If I had to go out on a limb, I think it will be Romney.
Sure, £10? I still think she is being prepared and has been designed to win.
adimon
17-09-2007, 02:08 AM
Sure, £10? I still think she is being prepared and has been designed to win.
A tenner is fine. Let the best man win.
Also sense it is known that the candidate with the most "royal blood" in them wins the election. Well who has the most "royal blood" in them?
Didn't happen last time. Kerry was the one with that honour :)