Copenhagen agreement "not legally binding"

[steppewar]

I know that man made climate change is a lie and so do the Elite.

They have even admitted that this 'Copenhagen agreement' is not legally binding. In other words, it is not worth the paper it is written on. I wonder how long it will be before most people realise that summits like these are just an excuse for our masters to go on a huge jolly, laughing in the face of their slaves (population).

BTW, I have just signed a "not legally binding" treaty to only use CFL lightbulbs for the rest of my life. In reality, I am typing this under the comfortable glow of one of my 850 incandescent bulbs. :rolleyes:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6843169/Copenhagen-climate-summit-Ed-Miliband-wanted-stronger-deal.html

[amaralsright]

Where do we find the exact details of everything that was agreed at Copenhagen?

Where do we find details of how each country will ratify the agreements?

The next one is in Mexico next year I believe, so the process continues.

[bluefeather]

Well if you live in the uk it may as well be real in terms of its consequences for higher bills and road pricing:mad:
CLIMATE NUT BROWN WILL RUIN BRITAIN



Gordon Brown makes a point as he delivers his speech in the plenary of the UN Climate Summit
Saturday December 19,2009
By John Ingham GORDON Brown was yesterday accused of signing a £500billion death warrant for Britain’s economy in his desperate quest for a climate change deal.


The Prime Minister has offered a dramatic 42 per cent cut to 1990 levels of carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2020.

His pledge – the biggest reduction proposed by any western industrialised nation – was made despite a continuing debate about whether mankind is to blame for climate change.

Ignoring the dire state of the country’s finances and record Government borrowing figures announced yesterday, Mr Brown has already pledged to hand over £7.5billion to an international fund to help poorer countries cope with climate change.

He made the 42 per cent offer in a bid to give the flagging talks in Copenhagen a fresh impetus with world leaders, including US President Barack Obama, trying to find a face-saving formula on the last day.

If he succeeds, he will be able to claim that he saved the planet much as he boasted of having “saved the world” over the banking crisis.

But the TaxPayers’ Alliance warned that achieving the target would require the economy to be slashed by 30 per cent from expected levels.

It argues that without a technological miracle in the next 10 years, the only way to achieve the cuts is to shrink the economy.

It says existing technology – such as new nuclear plants – will not be ready by 2020 and there is not enough time to develop new ones sufficiently to have an impact by then.

The Alliance’s research director Matthew Sinclair said: “It is absolutely incredible that Gordon Brown is still pledging ever more extreme and expensive cuts on Britain’s behalf.



“The Government are relying on rapid economic growth to help restore the public finances to health, but meeting such an ambitious target could require a recession of unprecedented ferocity.

“Governments shouldn’t sign up to targets unless they have a plan to meet them. They definitely shouldn’t sign a death warrant for the British economy.”

He added: “You will not be able to maintain any substantial manufacturing industry. There will be a huge increase in energy costs, pushing the average family to the brink.

“The 42 per cent target would also require big reductions in driving.”

Mr Brown’s offer is 10 times as deep as the cut promised by President Obama for America, which produces about 25 per cent of the world’s man-made carbon dioxide with just four per cent of the population.

The cuts are likely to require controversial measures such as more wind turbines, road pricing and green taxes.

A Treasury spokesman yesterday defended Mr Brown’s offer, saying: “We believe there are considerable economic advantages in investing in green technologies and being at the forefront of them.”

Daily Express readers showed their distrust of Mr Brown’s sweeping plans this week, with an overwhelming 98 per cent of those taking part in a phone vote agreeing that the nation was being conned over global warming.

link - http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/146922/Climate-nut-Brown-will-ruin-Britain

[steppewar]

This is all that is available at the moment ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6841838/Copenhagen-climate-summit-world-leaders-agree-deal-but-concede-it-does-not-go-far-enough.html

[amaralsright]

Ignoring the dire state of the country’s finances and record Government borrowing figures announced yesterday, Mr Brown has already pledged to hand over £7.5billion to an international fund to help poorer countries cope with climate change.

We have millions in Britain on the breadline (or below) and this idiot is giving away billions to "help cope with climate change".

We have a run-down NHS and Education system and he is giving away billions.

What are they going to do with this money?

How does giving countries billions of pounds not increase CO2 emissions of that country?

CO2 emission targets are bullshit.

The objective here is to break the spirit of the British people and any developed countries with a strong national identity.

[ozpixie]

It might not be legally binding but here in Australia we have many politicans, notably the Prime Minister and Premier of South Australia who will literally do anything to win the favour of the Illuminati and stay in their good books. Australia is just as vulnerable as the UK in the way that bluefeather has pointed out.

This 'not legally binding agreement' will soon sort those who are passionately desperate to get these taxes and totalitarian government formally set up, from those who are reluctant participants. By next year's meeting those countries whose leaders are most pro AGW will have the ball well and truly rolling.