PDA

View Full Version : Russia, U.S. disagree on new arms deal


december
12-09-2007, 04:23 PM
12/ 09/ 2007

http://img.rian.ru/images/6926/00/69260025.jpg


ROME, September 12 (RIA Novosti) - Russia and the United States have fundamental differences on a new agreement that is to replace the Strategic Arms Reduction (START) Treaty, a senior Foreign Ministry official said Wednesday.

Russian and U.S. delegations are conducting consultations in Rome to work out a new deal to replace the current START treaty, which expires December 5, 2009.

"Unfortunately, our differences are very serious. They concern the substance of a future accord. So far, we have been unable to convince the U.S. that a new document should be legally binding," Anatoly Antonov, director of the Foreign Ministry Security and Disarmament Department, said in an interview with RIA Novosti.

He said the Russian side hopes that solutions will be found in the course of further consultations.

"We will work until the last moment in an effort to reach an agreement that would respond to the interests of our two countries," he said.

The START I treaty was signed July 31, 1991, five months before the collapse of the Soviet Union, and expires December 5, 2009.

It remains in force as a treaty between the U.S., Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine have since totally eliminated their strategic arms capabilities, and the U.S. and Russia reduced the number of delivery vehicles to 1,600, with no more than 6,000 warheads.

The treaty was followed by START II, which banned the use of multiple re-entry vehicles (MIRV) but never entered into force and was later bypassed by the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions (SORT), signed by Vladimir Putin and George W. Bush in Moscow May 24, 2002.

Russia and the U.S. earlier confirmed plans to reduce their strategic arms to a minimum possible level and to develop new agreements on START.

Russia's foreign minister and the U.S. secretary of state said in a statement in June that Russia and the U.S. have confirmed their intention to minimize their strategic offensive arms and to develop relevant agreements.

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070912/78314052.html

synergy777
12-09-2007, 04:27 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=481310&in_page_id=1770

Russia tests the world's largest ever non-nuclear bomb
Last updated at 15:49pm on 12th September 2007

Russia has exploded the world's biggest non-nuclear bomb in a dramatic escalation of the new Cold War.


Nicknamed 'the father of all bombs', it was filmed being dropped from a strategic bomber and exploding in a massive fireball.


The film then showed the debris of apartment buildings and armoured vehicles at a testing range, as well as ground burned by a massive explosion

It didn't give the bomb's military name or say when it was tested.

Yuri Balyko, head of the Russian defence ministry's institute in charge of weapons design, said yesterday: "We have got a relatively cheap ordnance with a high strike power."


The test comes as Russia spends massively increased oil revenue on rebuilding its military might.

The device is said to be four times more powerful than America's Massive Ordnance Air Blast, nicknamed the Mother Of All Bombs.


It would target more specific areas than nuclear bombs, and is an immediate threat to problem areas such as Chechnya.


Last night a source close to the US National Security Council said it was a "matter of concern" that Moscow would develop such a huge weapon at a time when there was no obvious need.

He added that the US would ask for an explanation. He said there was "no chance" that America would become involved in a new arms race with the Russians and that the US had no use for bombs larger than the ones already in its arsenal.


While US intelligence was aware that Moscow was working on a new thermobaric device, it did not know that a test was imminent.


The latest raising of tension by Russia comes after president Vladimir Putin revived the Cold War era practice of flying bombers on long-range patrols.


Last week Royal Air Force fighter jets were scrambled to intercept eight Russian military planes flying in airspace patrolled by Nato.


The incident was the latest this summer in which British fighters have been used to warn off long-range Russian reconnaissance aircraft.


The so-called Mother of all Bombs is the biggest weapon in America's arsenal, capable of detonating 21,000lb of explosives above the ground.

The huge bomb, dropped from a slowmoving C130 Hercules aircraft and guided to its target by the satellite-linked global positioning system, can create temperatures of up to 1,000f (538c).


It is designed to obliterate chemical or biological agents concealed in bunkers.


The US is believed to have 15 in its arsenal but none is believed to have been used against an enemy.

december
12-09-2007, 04:30 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=481310&in_page_id=1770

Russia tests the world's largest ever non-nuclear bomb


That's right.
So the NATO countries will think twice before invading Russia.
There is a thread about it by the way:

http://davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9417

:)