juddfinn
01-12-2009, 05:42 PM
I wrote to Private Eye, as this should be right up their street... BUT Nothing (yet)...
Ian Hislop is a "Warmer" though isn't he???:eek:
---------------------------- my email -----------------------------------
I think you need to cover this Climategate IN DEPTH... as the mainstream media isn't
We have been lied to, and now the lies stack up even more by the claim it was 'hackers' that got into and released the megabytes of data/emails/info from the CRU.
Very Doubtful it was a lone hacker...
The information included e-mails, computer codes, annotations to code and the like. They were all of a part, not rife with "How's the wife?"-type correspondence but apparently the documents responding to a long-frustrated series of requests under our UK freedom of information law.
This is only one of numerous factors indicating that the disclosures were not the work of a "hacker," as the media parrot without evidence, but a whistleblower on the inside.
"Webmaster's Commentary:
This makes far more sense. As I pointed out when the story first broke, the emails were sent to BBC, which sat on the story for more than a month. At that point the files were posted to a pro-warmist website. Only after the files were erased from that site were the files posted to the Russian server and announced globally.
Wikileaks
This is a clear pattern of someone trying to correct the problem from within, first by going to BBC, then posting to the "community" and going fully public only as a last resort."
NOW, where are YOU Private Eye?????
Ian Hislop is a "Warmer" though isn't he???:eek:
---------------------------- my email -----------------------------------
I think you need to cover this Climategate IN DEPTH... as the mainstream media isn't
We have been lied to, and now the lies stack up even more by the claim it was 'hackers' that got into and released the megabytes of data/emails/info from the CRU.
Very Doubtful it was a lone hacker...
The information included e-mails, computer codes, annotations to code and the like. They were all of a part, not rife with "How's the wife?"-type correspondence but apparently the documents responding to a long-frustrated series of requests under our UK freedom of information law.
This is only one of numerous factors indicating that the disclosures were not the work of a "hacker," as the media parrot without evidence, but a whistleblower on the inside.
"Webmaster's Commentary:
This makes far more sense. As I pointed out when the story first broke, the emails were sent to BBC, which sat on the story for more than a month. At that point the files were posted to a pro-warmist website. Only after the files were erased from that site were the files posted to the Russian server and announced globally.
Wikileaks
This is a clear pattern of someone trying to correct the problem from within, first by going to BBC, then posting to the "community" and going fully public only as a last resort."
NOW, where are YOU Private Eye?????