PDA

View Full Version : WTSHTF where is the safest place in the world to b


rollotomaz1
30-11-2009, 07:18 PM
W T S H T F Where do you think is the safest place in the world to be.

Newzealnd, Austrailia, Scotland, Alaska, were ?

beldazar
30-11-2009, 07:19 PM
W T S H T F Where do you think is the safest place in the world to be.

Newzealnd, Austrailia, Scotland, Alaska, were ?

Buckingham Palace? Vatican?

neoconsumer
30-11-2009, 07:26 PM
I'd guess New Zealand.

Seem to be pretty neutral in most respects and they're a million miles away from everywhere.

I'll probably be off to Australia for a bit myself next year though, I'm a carpenter by trade so I think I'll be ok down there.

revmoofoo
30-11-2009, 07:28 PM
Don't go to Scotland, my countrymen can be really mean and will mug for everything you own! lol :D

ragman
30-11-2009, 07:28 PM
GAZA probably ............joke, id have to say the SAFEST is probably antartica, the place where all these Bastards will probably b going once ww3 kicks off , peace out

thedefender
30-11-2009, 07:31 PM
http://www.middle-earth.be/Fotos/Map.jpg

Middle Earth - in the forth age preferably!;)

nectars
30-11-2009, 07:34 PM
http://www.middle-earth.be/Fotos/Map.jpg

Middle Earth - in the forth age preferably!;)

Angmar or Erid Mithrin? lol

ndc777
30-11-2009, 07:34 PM
Andes or Himalayas

the nine
30-11-2009, 07:37 PM
Switzerland

where the gold is stored is where the bombs and devastation will not affect! :cool:

best get brushed up on your German..maybe a rossetta stone programme of torrent ;)

pumma
30-11-2009, 07:51 PM
Hi rollotomaz1

Strategicaly: That would be in Switzerland (http://live-in-switzerland.com/e/index.html). :D

Why? In a nutshell:

* At the heart of Europe one hour from all the big cities of Europe.
* Quality of life.
* Climate
* Security in the country (lovest crime rate in the world)
* No War since 1515
* Reasonable taxation
* Not in EU
* Option for a Private bank Account (more info Here (http://money.howstuffworks.com/personal-finance/banking/swiss-bank-account.htm))
...

That's my opinion by the way ;)

rollotomaz1
30-11-2009, 08:03 PM
I was going to say anywhere that has no oil but some places like that are inhabitable anyway, the Amazon rain forest with Raymond maybe, there is plenty for you to eat on him at the moment so the natives would go for him first, only kidding :D

the nine
30-11-2009, 08:30 PM
I was going to say anywhere that has no oil but some places like that are inhabitable anyway, the Amazon rain forest with Raymond maybe, there is plenty for you to eat on him at the moment so the natives would go for him first, only kidding :D

thats not safe..there is precious lumber and potential farm land for growing palm oil and cattle for big mac's..
well and truely earmarked for trouble!!!

concordewarrior
30-11-2009, 08:31 PM
I would probably bet on Argentina.

Such a vast country, very European, cheap land to buy, and you will be safe there. Who would again attack Argentina other than the UK and even then I don't see the UK going at it again.

Southern Brazil might be another good place.

jhado
30-11-2009, 08:33 PM
Ecuador

arty2000
30-11-2009, 08:34 PM
http://www.middle-earth.be/Fotos/Map.jpg

Middle Earth - in the forth age preferably!;)

I do love the evenings in the Shire:D

arty2000
30-11-2009, 08:38 PM
W T S H T F Where do you think is the safest place in the world to be.

Newzealnd, Austrailia, Scotland, Alaska, were ?

I have a fold away in the basement that your welcome to,,,gotta like dogs tho:D

redpill41
30-11-2009, 08:51 PM
whereever your friends and family are.

jhado
30-11-2009, 08:52 PM
I would probably bet on Argentina.

Such a vast country, very European, cheap land to buy, and you will be safe there. Who would again attack Argentina other than the UK and even then I don't see the UK going at it again.

Southern Brazil might be another good place.

When did the UK attack Argentina ?

If you're on about las malvinas(falklands)

that wasn't an attack on the Argentinian mainland. That was just off the isle of wight, involving 3 argentinian fishermen, you know how the press love to exaggerate.

sodi
30-11-2009, 09:00 PM
I would probably bet on Argentina.

Such a vast country, very European, cheap land to buy, and you will be safe there. Who would again attack Argentina other than the UK and even then I don't see the UK going at it again.

Southern Brazil might be another good place.

yes, Argentina :)

its also very beautiful

jhado
30-11-2009, 09:04 PM
Ecuador

white horse
30-11-2009, 09:05 PM
whereever your friends and family are.

awww good answer! :p

jhado
30-11-2009, 09:08 PM
awww good answer! :p

Yup, I wouldn't go without them.

decim
30-11-2009, 09:15 PM
former tyrants on the lam, like Paraguay..

Bush Buys Land in Northern Paraguay
Prensa Latina – Buenos Aires, Oct 13, 2006

Scroll down for update

An Argentine official regarded the intention of the George W. Bush family to settle on the Acuifero Guarani (Paraguay) as surprising, besides being a bad signal for the governments of the region.

Luis D Elia, undersecretary for the Social Habitat in the Argentine Federal Planning Ministry, issued a memo partially reproduced by digital INFOBAE.com, in which he spoke of the purchase by Bush of a 98,842-acre farm in northern Paraguay, between Brazil and Bolivia.

The news circulated Thursday in non-official sources in Asuncion, Paraguay.

D Elia considered this Bush step counterproductive for the regional power expressed by Presidents Nestor Kirchner, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Evo Morales, Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro.

He said that "it is a bad signal that the Bush family is doing business with natural resources linked to the future of MERCOSUR."

The official pointed out that this situation could cause a hypothetical conflict of all the armies in the region, and called attention to the Bush family habit of associating business and politics.
www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID={EBA55617-2676-4091-ABBC-20650EB6FEE1}&language=EN

Update
Bush Family Residence in Paraguay?
Written by April Howard – Upside Down World October 11, 2006
Note: all links are to Spanish/Portuguese websites apart from the final "Moonshine" link.

The Governor of Alto Paraguay, Erasmo Rodríguez Acosta has admitted to hearing that George Bush Sr. owns land in the Chaco region of Paraguay, in Paso de Patria. Acosta says that rumor has it that Bush owns near to 70 thousand hectares (173,000 acres) as part of an ecological reserve and/or ranch. However, the governor said he had no documents to prove the rumor. Acosta said that some stories credited the land to the Fundación Patria, which Bush would be a member of.

The spokespeople of the organization were not available to comment. Supposedly, Timothy Towell, the U.S. Ambassador in Asunción (the capital of Paraguay) is the present administrator of the land. First accounts signaled that Bush had acquired 40,000 hectares (99,000 acres) in the Chaco zone of Fuerte Olimpo, near the Bolivian Border. A spark of the interest in this property may have been Jenna Bush's private visit to Paraguay with Unicef, which started Saturday, October 7, 2006. Supposedly Jenna will travel to the ranch to ''observe'' several indigenous villages are located on the property.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=5324

jhado
30-11-2009, 09:18 PM
Ecuador

pi3141
30-11-2009, 11:59 PM
Australia - According to Stan Deyo

real6
01-12-2009, 12:50 PM
I'd always like to think near the tip of Argentina. Shit shit goes down, go there. Far away and isolated. Who's really going to fuck with Argentina???

rayne
01-12-2009, 01:07 PM
If it goes into nuclear war, South America would be one of the least irradiated zones, because there's no countries (at least officially) down there that possess nuclear weapons.

Africa, from what I see, would similiarly escape a good chunk of the high-radiation from a nuclear war.


Both countries would be hard for the elite to get full control of anytime soon, especially in their rural areas. However, a lot of those areas in African and South America are lawless, so you'd really have to find a good place to go.

oneup
01-12-2009, 01:55 PM
Is anyone seriously considering moving because of fear for some kind of WWIII/Nuclear armageddon?

neutrino
01-12-2009, 01:59 PM
Reunion Island.

tusme
01-12-2009, 02:07 PM
Anywhere off this Earth would do for me :)...otherwise, imho, any "location" where there has been "great strife" and "blood-loss" in the past, is at risk of "not being a safe place"... :(