View Full Version : Art Bell - Climategate "I See No Hoax Evidence"
lynfowars
28-11-2009, 09:04 PM
Art Bell, host of Coast To Coast AM radio show on Nov 27 2009.
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/11/27
You will find the torrent for the Nov 27 2009 show on Piratebay in a few hours, the shows are regularly posted.
In the first hour, he went onto say he is "a believer" in global warming.
In that statement, he dug his feet in and set his stall out. Now bring on the ridicule.
He mentioned he read some of the CRU emails, but could not see anything at all that made him think it was a hoax. Nothing.
He expressed disbelief that anyone else reading those emails could think otherwise.
:(
A few years back, Art Bell called the 9-11 Truth community "Wingnuts". He has not retracted that insult.
Once again, the most respected voice of the huge-audience Coast show gets to mouth-off, with no opposition, about the most important conspiracies of our age.
It's shame a man who is really trusted by millions of 'mom & pop' listeners should get away with his plainly ridiculous, intelligence-insulting comments.
Please feel free to educate him:
artbell@mindspring.com
phemohilia
28-11-2009, 09:13 PM
When I hear Art (Dumb)Bell say that he loved Ronald Reagan and that he was "one Hell of a President".... Well, I knew right then and there that he was not someone that I'd ever again have need to hear..... Poor bastard!!
dantesinferno
28-11-2009, 09:22 PM
that's crazy, that confirms what many have been saying for a long time, they have some great shows and guests but for Art Bell to say that is crazy, shame on him.
Anders Lindman
28-11-2009, 09:30 PM
But Art Bell believes the Apollo moon mission could have been a hoax. In one show the guest for the show talked about a lot of inconsistencies in the NASA records. And Art agreed. And Art even told about how he had spoken with one of the astronauts who supposedly had walked on the moon, and Art asked him something like: What did you feel when you walked on the moon? The astronaut replied that he didn't remember how it felt like. Art said that it was very strange. Probably the biggest moment in the astronaut's life, and he doesn't remember what it felt like?! :confused:
thedefender
28-11-2009, 09:59 PM
I don't get some of these people sometimes. They get involved in certain fields and topics and yet when hard evidence hits them in the head they go stupid instead of smart.
It's like believing in Goblins and not orcs. ;)
mikey mikey
28-11-2009, 10:08 PM
Art "God Bless George W. Bush and the U.S.A." Bell?
No thanks.
I've never really trusted Art Bell even before the information which shown him to be a freemason and pushing known disinfo.
This lecture was interesting which shows him to have been involved in child abuse. Either way, his information really holds no weight to the evidence provided.
Ted Gunderson - The Story of the Art Bell Lawsuit
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=137884152254825718#
thedefender
28-11-2009, 10:09 PM
Art "God Bless George W. Bush and the U.S.A." Bell?
No thanks.
He said that?:eek:
branjo
28-11-2009, 10:11 PM
George Noory is a cool guy though imho, he's the only one I listen to on C2C.
thedefender
28-11-2009, 10:18 PM
George Noory is a cool guy though imho, he's the only one I listen to on C2C. I noticed with George though is that he acts completely clueless sometimes. Yes, it is his job to do that but it seems a bit much. In some interviews it seems he puts himself on guard because of the little he knows. Especially with Richard Hoagland.
I think his perception of things and especially aliens are still the little fun green critters with big heads that want to play.
Anders Lindman
28-11-2009, 10:20 PM
George Noory is a cool guy though imho, he's the only one I listen to on C2C.
One strange thing though is that George Noory, as opposed to Art Bell, does NOT believe the Apollo moon mission was a hoax. :confused:
branjo
28-11-2009, 10:40 PM
I noticed with George though is that he acts completely clueless sometimes. Yes, it is his job to do that but it seems a bit much. In some interviews it seems he puts himself on guard because of the little he knows. Especially with Richard Hoagland.
I think his perception of things and especially aliens are still the little fun green critters with big heads that want to play.
lol, yeah you are probably right but It's his guests that we are listening to though. He does keep the middle of the road stance and basically that's his job. If he gets all opinionated then he could turn into another Alex Jones and then all the divisions and finger pointing that goes with it would just open up a can of worms. He tries to keep the peace maybe a little too much, but I don't really think this reflects badly on him either.
You're right about Hoagland, they are very good friends and it seems like he is trying to ground Hoagland a little from going into hyperdimensional physics too much. I mean I think Hoagland is great, a bit out there but still a man that just wants to know things he's not supposed to. I wouldn't call him a hard core truth seeker, but there is no denying that Hoagland has a very intelligent head on his shoulders. He is a little on the naive side too, but I don't fault him for with that.
thedefender
28-11-2009, 10:46 PM
lol, yeah you are probably right but It's his guests that we are listening to though. He does keep the middle of the road stance and basically that's his job. If he gets all opinionated then he could turn into another Alex Jones and then all the divisions and finger pointing that goes with it would just open up a can of worms. He tries to keep the peace maybe a little too much, but I don't really think this reflects badly on him either.
You're right about Hoagland, they are very good friends and it seems like he is trying to ground Hoagland a little from going into hyperdimensional physics too much. I mean I think Hoagland is great, a bit out there but still a man that just wants to know things he's not supposed to. I wouldn't call him a hard core truth seeker, but there is no denying that Hoagland has a very intelligent head on his shoulders. He is a little on the naive side too, but I don't fault him for with that.
Right on! The first interview I saw of Hoagland besides being on C2C was Project Camelot. He definately thinks he is the 'cats pajamas'. :D He has a tendancy to take over these interviews.
the nine
28-11-2009, 10:48 PM
I don't get some of these people sometimes. They get involved in certain fields and topics and yet when hard evidence hits them in the head they go stupid instead of smart.
It's like believing in Goblins and not orcs. ;)
he is merely singing for his supper!
amaralsright
28-11-2009, 10:49 PM
Art Bell is not a disinfo shill.
No sir.
branjo
28-11-2009, 10:59 PM
One strange thing though is that George Noory, as opposed to Art Bell, does NOT believe the Apollo moon mission was a hoax. :confused:
I don't think it was a hoax either :)
amaralsright
28-11-2009, 11:01 PM
I don't think it was a hoax either :)
It wasn't.
amaralsright
28-11-2009, 11:02 PM
Art Bell is not a disinfo shill.
No sir.
Sorry typo, yes he is.
Anders Lindman
28-11-2009, 11:31 PM
I don't think it was a hoax either :)
No? Then explain the following picture:
http://www.mypicx.com/uploadimg/38533515_10242009_1.gif
;)
thedefender
28-11-2009, 11:39 PM
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/cimages/var/ezwebin_site/storage/images/coast-to-coast/repository/photos/lunar-hoax-material-i/439101-1-eng-US/Lunar-Hoax-Material-I.jpg
branjo
29-11-2009, 01:42 AM
You're thinking that by me saying it wasn't a hoax, means there was not manipulation of the photographic evidence.
A common misconception.
Just like if I say I don't like Alex Jones, then I must be against the truth movement, and I believe the official report on 9/11.
Absolutely no different.
I could take a cardboard cut out of the Eiffel Tower and have my picture taken in front of it in France in front of the actual Eiffel Tower and you could argue all day that I am not in France, and your only proof would be a picture of a fake background. And yet I could be enjoying croissants in France.
The evidence of a faked moon landing is simply just faked pictures. Photographs are not proof of anything more than what they are, and trust me I have probably seen them all, I was right into the hoax theory a couple of years ago. Because it is such an easy as hell way to go, its almost as if the theory has been "provided" with pathetically faked pictures. And I am sorry but you don't need to be a photographer to spot them either. So the little nugget that the photographers purposefully made these mistakes for future people to see is just to simple a pill to swallow.
If anyone thinks that they are super intelligent by noticing that the light angles don't add up then you can stop right there, you are being handed a belief system on a silver platter and you are eating it with a smile on your face and a sense of mental closure to the whole thing. "they faked it, next theory please".
Its far more useful to the PTB to have nosy people chase their tails than be concerned with the actual truth that our entire perception of the world, the moon, the solar system and the galaxy be confined to science fiction.
I do believe that the astronauts are either knowingly or unknowingly lying their asses off, but about what, there is no strict 100% provable evidence on. Like I said before the only proof the "hoaxed moon landing theory" has, is faked pictures and a pack of lying bastards like NASA saying "yup" that's the moon.
Misdirection rolled up in a blanket of misinformation expressly for the purpose of future damage control. They would rather let you think they are stupid than to realize how deviously smart they really are.
Just like 9/11, they would rather have you think the security agencies were so inept at their job than let you know that its far better and easier to control the outcome if you and I just think they are stupid rather than guilty of something far more sinister.
Are you under the impression, that directly beneath every lie, is the truth? Its lie on top of lie, on top of lie, on top of lie. Hockums razor may be a useful way to determine truth, but for the case of an outright lie, its a very useful disguise for the truth to remain hidden.
I am not "telling" you to believe what I believe, I am just asking you to be suspicious of everything we are being led to believe is the truth, and that includes the apparent evidence of a lie. We cannot just accept the next piece of evidence after the one we just saw through. The same people that made the lie are probably the same people that are handing us the next lie passing it off as truth all over again.
I am just cynical about everything...lol.
Anders Lindman
29-11-2009, 02:37 AM
The evidence of a faked moon landing is simply just faked pictures.
I'm no expert on the moon mission theories, but to me the pictures from NASA don't convince me. It could be that they faked photos and films even if they really went to the moon, just because the photographic film would be destroyed by radiation and heat so that no pictures could be taken. On the other hand, it's suspect that they managed to complete the first man on the moon just before the end of the decade as JFK had promised (after having been tricked by LBJ to order the moon mission I might add). It's a similar thing that happened with the Manhattan Project, another hoax that conveniently was completed just before WW2 was completely over.
Hoax upon hoax upon hoax... I will take to opportunity to plug my latest and perhaps most outrageous conspiracy theory yet:
http://davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93206
:D
graflok
29-11-2009, 02:50 AM
The evidence of a faked moon landing is simply just faked pictures.
No, there is more than just faked photos. There are also the numerous, preposterous aspects of
the Apollo missions plus contrary and false data from NASA.
For starters, see the recent series of articles on Apollo by Dave (Laurel Canyon) McGowan which starts here:
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/Apollo1.html
Art "God Bless George W. Bush and the U.S.A." Bell?
No thanks.
Yep.
No thanks.
Art Bell is a notorious F R A U D
leviathanstaar
29-11-2009, 04:54 AM
lol Art Bell
e7304
29-11-2009, 01:34 PM
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/cimages/var/ezwebin_site/storage/images/coast-to-coast/repository/photos/lunar-hoax-material-i/439101-1-eng-US/Lunar-Hoax-Material-I.jpg
I have always known it was a hoax....ppl are stupid.
ronisron
29-11-2009, 02:30 PM
I remember listening to that radio show during the mid '90's very fondly. I remember when Marshall Applewhite was on there talking about Hale Bopp previous to the Heaven's Gate mass suicide, interviews with Richard Hoagland, the crazy regulars.... in any case he had something very popular on his hands with his radio show then, anything and everything went on the air. He really seemed to have no opinions, he would just present the story. He became really "opinionated" after certain events started happening which led to a few "retirements".
"His first retirement, highly unexpected, was announced on October 13, 1998. Bell: I told you that there was an event, a threatening terrible event occurred to my family, which I could not tell you about. Because of that event, and a succession of other events, what you're listening to right now is my final broadcast on the air. Coast To Coast AM is broadcast on more than 400 stations and is the country's most listened to overnight radio show, heard by some 15 million listeners.
He returned on October 28, 1998, leading many to believe it was merely a publicity stunt. Bell asserted that the brief departure was brought on by threats made against his family. On May 29, 1999, Art Bell explained that this retirement was due to an allegation made by hosts of WWCR shortwave radio that Bell had paid to cover up a criminal indictment.
The actual facts of the matter became public knowledge with Art Bell's second retirement in 2000, when it was revealed that an actual criminal indictment was filed against a person who had assaulted a member of Bell's family. Due to the nature of the crime, Bell had wanted to keep the matter private. The hosts at WWCR shortwave radio had accused Bell of the crime.
On April 1, 2000, Bell once again announced to his audience his retirement, which would occur on April 26, 2000 (that from "The Washington Post" 4-1-00), but he offered no details other than expressing intentions to "resolve a family crisis." On April 11, 2000, Mike Siegel was introduced as the new host of Coast To Coast AM. On April 27, 2000, Siegel took over the program which at the this time had an estimated 22 million listeners. (That from "The Seattle Times" 4-12-00.) It was later explained he had left to deal with the aftermath of a sexual assault against his son. Brian Lepley, a substitute teacher, was convicted of sexual assault and attempted transmission of HIV and was sentenced to 10 to 25 years.
Ramona Bell, his wife of 15 years, died unexpectedly, at the age of 47, of what appeared to be an acute asthma attack on January 5, 2006 in Laughlin, Nevada, where the couple was taking a short vacation.
The events surrounding Ramona's death were described in great detail by Art Bell during the January 22 broadcast of Coast to Coast AM. For weeks thereafter, callers would express their sadness and sympathy for Art Bell to George Noory, who had taken Art Bell's place weekdays in 2002."
Keep in mind, Art is also a Freemason.... I think he stepped outside of his boundaries for a while, and had to be "subtly persuaded" to keep in line. He now shills unapologetically for the NWO as he was meant to all along. If anyone remembers that show from the mid '90's, they know what I'm talking about. He had real issues with Bill Cooper, but Cooper had issues with a lot of people.
bobbydiva
29-11-2009, 02:43 PM
To me it seems C2C as good as it is, is there to deal with all the FAR OUT conspiracies. Maybe like a holding pot.
aussieaussie
30-11-2009, 03:03 AM
http://eglowhealthcare.com/images/eye_chart%202.jpg
branjo
30-11-2009, 05:31 AM
I have always known it was a hoax....ppl are stupid.
lol yeah but your awesome. :)