View Full Version : How symbolism effect us?
s2eve
26-11-2009, 01:04 PM
Hi,
Symbolism is everywhere, but how can it's actually effect me?
passing
26-11-2009, 01:44 PM
Hi,
Symbolism is everywhere, but how can it's actually effect me?
When you see the big yellow M do you fancy a burger?
venividivici2311
26-11-2009, 02:03 PM
When you see the big yellow M do you fancy a burger?
kind of like that yeah,but i think the OP is talking about the triangles,obelisks etc etc,the more secretive symbols,more than 5 billion people don't know what the meaning is,so what's the use in planting them everywhere.
phfaty
26-11-2009, 02:48 PM
I got this off of a posting on abovetopsecret forums. Apparently Russian researchers have proven what the ancients have long been known to know. That we are the masters of our reality and mind over matter is possible. Now we know why they labeled most of the human DNA "Junk DNA" - to hide this fact from us.
Read about it here http://www.aeonia.com/russian-dna-discoveries-mind-blowing
s2eve
26-11-2009, 03:05 PM
kind of like that yeah,but i think the OP is talking about the triangles,obelisks etc etc,the more secretive symbols,more than 5 billion people don't know what the meaning is,so what's the use in planting them everywhere.
you right :confused: what for example pentagram doing? Some people claim it's attracting demons
I got this off of a posting on abovetopsecret forums. Apparently Russian researchers have proven what the ancients have long been known to know. That we are the masters of our reality and mind over matter is possible. Now we know why they labeled most of the human DNA "Junk DNA" - to hide this fact from us.
Read about it here http://www.aeonia.com/russian-dna-discoveries-mind-blowing
very interesting
tnx
lyghtkynge
26-11-2009, 03:51 PM
The Archetypes vary in their effect...the more Prime they are (Prime Archetypes), the more powerful the effect upon the Unconscious-Subconscious, half of which gives Rise to the Conscious via interforce action with the SuperConscious.
This is Principle, not fallacious dogma-info, from the Prime Archetypes Direct: Symbols Are Made Flesh in the Creative Actions.
I've already posted on this (search), explaining it in entirety, not so long ago (week+).
In the Unconscious mode (humanity), You become these archetypes, both Prime, secondary, tertiary & sub-prime. The Process is under control via what's known as the Dominant Image, or I-Mage, of which there are Many & One. The One is All Dominant, the Many are; of course, interaffective. The interaffective part is where the Battle of The Self occurs, played out on the Stage of Life as you see it, both Marco, Micro, & Mobile~[the offspring(s)].
What I might add here is that the One Dominant I-Mage 'symbol' is both Self-Generated (being Pre-Existant), and Adjusted, where the Generator's ('creators,' the self-claimed gods & their minions, the Elite) Battle amoungst themselves for Generation of Their Version of the Prime I-Mage Symbol. This is the Ferocious Battle of Opposites, and the Cause of Life ItSelf. With no battle, Strife-Conflict, their is No InterPlay, No Life Flow. There are Two Flows of Force in Life, called Dual, which are the Divine DownFlow called InfluxFlow, and the Sacred UpFlow, called the LifeForce Flow. The First is Self-ReGenerative Potency, the other is Both Annihilative & Self-ReGenerative Potential/Potency.
Thus you see why each action you make or life takes, interaffects all other life. At the Top, this is easily manipulated as Cause; at the bottom, only subconsciously, for it is the sub-soil of Effect.
http://www.vongoth.com/zodic%20wheel.bmphttp://victorian.fortunecity.com/palette/187/jung13.gifhttp://www.ynysprydein.org/arianrhod/SealofS.gif
loopy2222
26-11-2009, 04:18 PM
you right :confused: what for example pentagram doing? Some people claim it's attracting demons
very interesting
tnx
hope not!! :eek: As a Wiccan (Pagan) I wear mine all the time!
s2eve
27-11-2009, 07:52 PM
The Archetypes vary in their effect...the more Prime they are (Prime Archetypes), the more powerful the effect upon the Unconscious-Subconscious, half of which gives Rise to the Conscious via interforce action with the SuperConscious.
This is Principle, not fallacious dogma-info, from the Prime Archetypes Direct: Symbols Are Made Flesh in the Creative Actions.
I've already posted on this (search), explaining it in entirety, not so long ago (week+).
In the Unconscious mode (humanity), You become these archetypes, both Prime, secondary, tertiary & sub-prime. The Process is under control via what's known as the Dominant Image, or I-Mage, of which there are Many & One. The One is All Dominant, the Many are; of course, interaffective. The interaffective part is where the Battle of The Self occurs, played out on the Stage of Life as you see it, both Marco, Micro, & Mobile~[the offspring(s)].
What I might add here is that the One Dominant I-Mage 'symbol' is both Self-Generated (being Pre-Existant), and Adjusted, where the Generator's ('creators,' the self-claimed gods & their minions, the Elite) Battle amoungst themselves for Generation of Their Version of the Prime I-Mage Symbol. This is the Ferocious Battle of Opposites, and the Cause of Life ItSelf. With no battle, Strife-Conflict, their is No InterPlay, No Life Flow. There are Two Flows of Force in Life, called Dual, which are the Divine DownFlow called InfluxFlow, and the Sacred UpFlow, called the LifeForce Flow. The First is Self-ReGenerative Potency, the other is Both Annihilative & Self-ReGenerative Potential/Potency.
Thus you see why each action you make or life takes, interaffects all other life. At the Top, this is easily manipulated as Cause; at the bottom, only subconsciously, for it is the sub-soil of Effect.
http://www.vongoth.com/zodic%20wheel.bmphttp://victorian.fortunecity.com/palette/187/jung13.gifhttp://www.ynysprydein.org/arianrhod/SealofS.gif
now I'm confused even more :confused:
s2eve
27-11-2009, 07:53 PM
hope not!! :eek: As a Wiccan (Pagan) I wear mine all the time!
so you possessed by demons :p
armoured_amazon
27-11-2009, 07:55 PM
hope not!! :eek: As a Wiccan (Pagan) I wear mine all the time!
LOL @ that smiley :D
loopy2222
27-11-2009, 08:57 PM
so you possessed by demons :p
haha not sure about demons but I dunno what possesses me some of the time :D
wyndham
27-11-2009, 09:33 PM
posted in stepford wive thread but repeated here
Striking resemblances of some current Hollywood actresses in the paintings of Botticelli (1500 ad)?
"Modern media started in the Rensaissance" -Fabricio del Tantore
"...It is important to control the idea of beauty, or destroy it, or change it...but the human mind has a natural sensor, unlike a digital camera, connected to something atemporal that goes beyond anything even archetypal but in reaction to it, which can of course be replaced in part by thousands of hours of television or 50 years of Freudean psychology...all of the molding, image manipulation, doubling, is to prevent a certain aesthetic from validating this natural sensor we all have, even buried beneath the surface reality of our impressions of things...all meaning is metaphor because our brain is actually founded on something that is historical in memory. There are layers of meaning to a beautiful face. There is the immediate acceptance that what one is looking at is beautiful as empirically evident in current social time etc...but there is also something historical taking place that positive science has never been able to address, that is a huge debate throughout history and philosophy and that today is taken-up by philosophy of mind and other theories of cognition and aesthetics that for the most part attack the idea of this natural sensor, which was considered self-evident until maybe 500 years ago...that there is something formal in the Platonic sense to natural beauty, something that actually connects us currently, in real time and almost virtually to the past, of what is 'written in a face'...so when we see a pretty face, and it is getting harder and harder to find a 'natural beauty', whether because of style or artificial techniques, our historical memory is actually at play...something that in a very real way connects us to a past that we can only infer, but strongly...to embrace 'the ugly' actually has layers of irony placed upon itself...so when you play with the idea of beauty, it is really hardly trivial, when you are selling images, it is very important to the way society understands itself...and to deprive a culture of natural beauty, or to make it very difficult to discover for oneself has implications to not only the understading that culture has of its past but the direction it is going to take or be willed into taking for the future...man becomes pure causation when this idea of the natural sensor and historical memory and aesthetic is displaced, when one can not react properly or ever fuse certain emotional synapses to something historical...the cultural leaders throughout history understood this and did their best to find the right imagery for the time...Hollywood is the heir to Botticelli...truth really is beauty in a way and beauty truth, at least as far as self understanding..." -Berto Comeu, trns. by Peter Echin
http://arturovasquez.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/botticelli.jpg
? Cate Blanchett
http://daretodream.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/11/24/cate_blanchett_lady_galadriel.jpg
http://trilogy.brynmawr.edu/guides/upload/pics/619/botticelli001.jpg
Reese Witherspoon
http://cdn.sheknows.com/celebsalon/2008/10/reese-witherspoon-elegant-bun-hairstyle-06.jpg
posted in stepford wive thread but repeated here
Striking resemblances of some current Hollywood actresses in the paintings of Botticelli (1500 ad)?
"Modern media started in the Rensaissance" -Fabricio del Tantore
"...It is important to control the idea of beauty, or destroy it, or change it...but the human mind has a natural sensor, unlike a digital camera, connected to something atemporal that goes beyond anything even archetypal but in reaction to it, which can of course be replaced in part by thousands of hours of television or 50 years of Freudean psychology...all of the molding, image manipulation, doubling, is to prevent a certain aesthetic from validating this natural sensor we all have, even buried beneath the surface reality of our impressions of things...all meaning is metaphor because our brain is actually founded on something that is historical in memory. There are layers of meaning to a beautiful face. There is the immediate acceptance that what one is looking at is beautiful as empirically evident in current social time etc...but there is also something historical taking place that positive science has never been able to address, that is a huge debate throughout history and philosophy and that today is taken-up by philosophy of mind and other theories of cognition and aesthetics that for the most part attack the idea of this natural sensor, which was considered self-evident until maybe 500 years ago...that there is something formal in the Platonic sense to natural beauty, something that actually connects us currently, in real time and almost virtually to the past, of what is 'written in a face'...so when we see a pretty face, and it is getting harder and harder to find a 'natural beauty', whether because of style or artificial techniques, our historical memory is actually at play...something that in a very real way connects us to a past that we can only infer, but strongly...to embrace 'the ugly' actually has layers of irony placed upon itself...so when you play with the idea of beauty, it is really hardly trivial, when you are selling images, it is very important to the way society understands itself...and to deprive a culture of natural beauty, or to make it very difficult to discover for oneself has implications to not only the understading that culture has of its past but the direction it is going to take or be willed into taking for the future...man becomes pure causation when this idea of the natural sensor and historical memory and aesthetic is displaced, when one can not react properly or ever fuse certain emotional synapses to something historical...the cultural leaders throughout history understood this and did their best to find the right imagery for the time...Hollywood is the heir to Botticelli...truth really is beauty in a way and beauty truth, at least as far as self understanding..." -Berto Comeu, trns. by Peter Echin
http://arturovasquez.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/botticelli.jpg
? Cate Blanchett
http://daretodream.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/11/24/cate_blanchett_lady_galadriel.jpg
http://trilogy.brynmawr.edu/guides/upload/pics/619/botticelli001.jpg
Reese Witherspoon
http://cdn.sheknows.com/celebsalon/2008/10/reese-witherspoon-elegant-bun-hairstyle-06.jpg
good post
hope not!! :eek: As a Wiccan (Pagan) I wear mine all the time!
Pentagrams can envoke the trapping of a 'entity' in the pentagram itselve.
Like wearing like an amulet or lucky charm whatsoever.
Especially if you give it truly power and admire it in sort way.
The Archetypes vary in their effect...the more Prime they are (Prime Archetypes), the more powerful the effect upon the Unconscious-Subconscious, half of which gives Rise to the Conscious via interforce action with the SuperConscious.
This is Principle, not fallacious dogma-info, from the Prime Archetypes Direct: Symbols Are Made Flesh in the Creative Actions.
I've already posted on this (search), explaining it in entirety, not so long ago (week+).
In the Unconscious mode (humanity), You become these archetypes, both Prime, secondary, tertiary & sub-prime. The Process is under control via what's known as the Dominant Image, or I-Mage, of which there are Many & One. The One is All Dominant, the Many are; of course, interaffective. The interaffective part is where the Battle of The Self occurs, played out on the Stage of Life as you see it, both Marco, Micro, & Mobile~[the offspring(s)].
What I might add here is that the One Dominant I-Mage 'symbol' is both Self-Generated (being Pre-Existant), and Adjusted, where the Generator's ('creators,' the self-claimed gods & their minions, the Elite) Battle amoungst themselves for Generation of Their Version of the Prime I-Mage Symbol. This is the Ferocious Battle of Opposites, and the Cause of Life ItSelf. With no battle, Strife-Conflict, their is No InterPlay, No Life Flow. There are Two Flows of Force in Life, called Dual, which are the Divine DownFlow called InfluxFlow, and the Sacred UpFlow, called the LifeForce Flow. The First is Self-ReGenerative Potency, the other is Both Annihilative & Self-ReGenerative Potential/Potency.
Thus you see why each action you make or life takes, interaffects all other life. At the Top, this is easily manipulated as Cause; at the bottom, only subconsciously, for it is the sub-soil of Effect.
http://www.vongoth.com/zodic%20wheel.bmphttp://victorian.fortunecity.com/palette/187/jung13.gifhttp://www.ynysprydein.org/arianrhod/SealofS.gif
Good post, i see what you mean but, could you give a more detailed explanation so i can understand it more, i know they are affecting the future
with symbols but i need more info.