majicdragon
19-11-2009, 01:31 PM
my mother went to a notary once, and i forget what that was for, but i do remember there was a list of professional people that they wanted you to use. i think maybe the notary was on vacation or there wasn't one, but we were in a small town....
anyways, anyhow, they wanted her to find cops, lawyers, judges that she might know. and she wasn't allowed to use a regular person. so, what i think is that since those are professional people from the law society... they are the ones to whom the law refers when it says "the community of good standing"
now, when the law tells us that we have to use three people from the community of good standing, the law is really referring to THEM. like as in the "them" from "THEY LIVE"
check out this google link: googlieboogly (http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22the+community+of+good+standing%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a)http://worldfreemansociety.org/img/icons/external_link.gif
so, because of the wording of the name, the multi-worded name, they can hide the title of this special group of "thems" within a document as another deception against us.
you know, we have a person. i'll bet these guys are people, and this is why they also include a definition of monster in their dictionary... under "human" you see.
i've been watching menard videos for about a month or more straight now, and you know, i think some of his soul has gotten into me.
so what i propose we look at, is: where else these people are hiding this name... what else is only for "THEM" ?
this muti-worded name, "the community of good standing" as far as i can see, could be hidden in other passages to even greater detriment.
you know, when i was a kid... teen, whatever, there were certain children, teens, whatever, who did come up to me and ask me if i knew about the security of my person, and i'll just bet it was little "THEMS"
so lets go look now and see if it isn't worse than we expect...
let's go get "EM" monsters!... what do you say guys ?
anyways, anyhow, they wanted her to find cops, lawyers, judges that she might know. and she wasn't allowed to use a regular person. so, what i think is that since those are professional people from the law society... they are the ones to whom the law refers when it says "the community of good standing"
now, when the law tells us that we have to use three people from the community of good standing, the law is really referring to THEM. like as in the "them" from "THEY LIVE"
check out this google link: googlieboogly (http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22the+community+of+good+standing%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a)http://worldfreemansociety.org/img/icons/external_link.gif
so, because of the wording of the name, the multi-worded name, they can hide the title of this special group of "thems" within a document as another deception against us.
you know, we have a person. i'll bet these guys are people, and this is why they also include a definition of monster in their dictionary... under "human" you see.
i've been watching menard videos for about a month or more straight now, and you know, i think some of his soul has gotten into me.
so what i propose we look at, is: where else these people are hiding this name... what else is only for "THEM" ?
this muti-worded name, "the community of good standing" as far as i can see, could be hidden in other passages to even greater detriment.
you know, when i was a kid... teen, whatever, there were certain children, teens, whatever, who did come up to me and ask me if i knew about the security of my person, and i'll just bet it was little "THEMS"
so lets go look now and see if it isn't worse than we expect...
let's go get "EM" monsters!... what do you say guys ?