I need some help on Codex Alimentarius and rBGH

[ddriver]

Hi there, I've recently watched that lady that said codex alimentarius will force everyone into using rBGH on his dairy cows.

However when I tried to validate those words I somewhat failed.

Google searches revealed just a few sources that claim the UN and Codex Alimentarius actually supports the use of rBGH, and most of the articles I found actually say the Codex is AGAINST the use of rBGH, so I am a bit confused.

All those publications were 1999 or earlier, so I failed to find more recent information of the official stance of the Codex when it comes to rBGH.

I also went to the official website of the Codex, and tried searching for Monsantos, rBGH, recombinant bovine growth hormone - and I failed to find any matches in both the standard and extended search form.

So I was wondering if anyone can help me out with some way to confirm all those things that lady said, and mostly that the codex is FOR the use of rBGH. She says "believe everything that I say" but I need to see this for myself, as she claims that information is available in the public domain, and my search skills are pretty good, so it is really strange that I fail to find and genuine confirmation of her story about Codex Alimentarius.


10x in advance

[goldenbear]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bovine_somatotropin

http://www.ethicalinvesting.com/monsanto/bgh.shtml

http://www.psrast.org/bghcodex.htm

https://secure.pesticides.gov.uk/MRLs/

ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/Alinorm09/al32REPe.pdf

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/servlet/VetDrugServlet?Substances=0&Items=501&Tissues=9&out_style=by+substance&Domain=VetDrugMRLs&Language=english&query_form=%2Fmrls%2Fvetdrugs%2Fvetd_q-e.htm

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/servlet/VetDrugServlet?Substances=0&Items=501&Tissues=3&out_style=by+substance&Domain=VetDrugMRLs&Language=english&query_form=%2Fmrls%2Fvetdrugs%2Fvetd_q-e.htm

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/servlet/VetDrugServlet?Substances=0&Items=501&Tissues=2&out_style=by+substance&Domain=VetDrugMRLs&Language=english&query_form=%2Fmrls%2Fvetdrugs%2Fvetd_q-e.htm

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/servlet/VetDrugServlet?Substances=0&Items=501&Tissues=6&out_style=by+substance&Domain=VetDrugMRLs&Language=english&query_form=%2Fmrls%2Fvetdrugs%2Fvetd_q-e.htm

http://www.codexalimentarius.net/mrls/servlet/VetDrugServlet?Substances=0&Items=501&Tissues=1&out_style=by+substance&Domain=VetDrugMRLs&Language=english&query_form=%2Fmrls%2Fvetdrugs%2Fvetd_q-e.htm

note all pesticides were asked for and the tables clealy state that there are traces of all pesticides in cow/milk so whether or not you have the specific named growth hormone or not you still have the evidence to tell you that there is crap in our food. rbgh is a general term for specific hormones.have you typed in the search engin the real latin names you might come up with the evidence you need.

the people saying this stuff would not say it if it were not true.and they have clearly told us in media stories the fact that boys are becoming females as for plastic,hormones in foood ect.... what other proof do you need.sherry twopenny is a respected scientist and the reason she broke silence is that she had enough of the propoganda bullshit that these elite keep plying us with.

[ddriver]

10x for the response, it is obvious the codex is written in such a way that conceals very simple truths with tons of complexity. I see the "acceptable" norms for crap in our food but thats not what I was after:

What she said, and I need confirmed, is that by Codex growth hormones will become MANDATORY on 31 Dec 2009 in the US. This is in direct conflict with what I read on wikipedia:

By 2009, in the United States consumer desire for "no artificial growth hormones" caused a domino-effect causing most milk products to become rBST-free

[merlincove]

bump

Important stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmrF9KjlGsc