Nibiru--Spotted by south pole Telescope??

[archangel]

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Does anyone know if this information is correct? Is Nibiru headed our way?

I couldn't find much info on this from google searching

Where is this guy getting his info from.

[cf24]

I heard I was destroyed several years ago, anyone?

[archangel]

I heard I was destroyed several years ago, anyone?

what was destroyed?? Nibiru?

I think that seems pretty silly

[mynameis]

There is no sighting, no planet, no nada zip. End of Story. Read through the owners comments and verify his own facts.

[cf24]

Stewart Swerdlow reckons it was destroyed in 2003. Is it true, who knows.....

[chattanova]

Part 1 of 5 shows how the approach of Planet X is already changing our world. Produced and hosted by Marshall Masters, a former CNN science feature field producer, this program offers a straightforward view of this coming human event. As the co-author and publisher of Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide, Marshall believes that 2012 will be a survivable, evolutionary event.
http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/1491/Surviving_2012__amp__Planet_X___Part_1_5__The_Thre at/

Part 2 of 5 presents scientific proof for a catastrophic return of Planet X in 2012. Produced and hosted by Marshall Masters, a former CNN science feature field producer, this program offers a straightforward view of this coming human event. As the co-author and publisher of Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide, Marshall believes that 2012 will be a survivable, evolutionary event.
http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/1490/Surviving_2012__amp__Planet_X___Part_2_5__Science/?vpkey=

Part 3 of 5 presents historical proof for past catastrophic flybys of Planet X and ancient predictions regarding 2012. Produced and hosted by Marshall Masters, a former CNN science feature field producer, this program offers a straightforward view of this coming human event. As the co-author and publisher of Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide, Marshall believes that 2012 will be a survivable, evolutionary event.
http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/1489/Surviving_2012__amp__Planet_X___Part_3_5__The_Proo f/?vpkey=

Part 4 of 5 examines the massive Planet X preparations our governments are making in anticipation of a 2012 Planet X flyby. Produced and hosted by Marshall Masters, a former CNN science feature field producer, this program offers a straightforward view of this coming human event. As the co-author and publisher of Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide, Marshall believes that 2012 will be a survivable, evolutionary event.
http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/1488/Surviving_2012__amp__Planet_X___Part_4_5__Survive_ Doom/?vpkey=

Part 5 of 5 offers a post-2014 vision of our world and how humanity will rebuild after the Planet X flyby. Produced and hosted by Marshall Masters, a former CNN science feature field producer, this program offers a straightforward view of this coming human event. As the co-author and publisher of Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide, Marshall believes that 2012 will be a survivable, evolutionary event.
http://www.disclose.tv/viewvideo/1487/Surviving_2012__amp__Planet_X___Part_5_5__Beyond_2 012/?vpkey=

[chattanova]

I dont know what to believe about Planet-X ,but this documentary are pretty convincing....

[mynameis]

The links for me are either dead or just too damn languid. My ISP is acting up I'll try again later.

[sean~infinte]

maybe niburu was always there??????

i agree with what icke says when people say they have found a new planet well in actual fact it was always there but the rising frequency is causing us to see a lot more of that 95.5% that we humans cant (used) see

maybe that planet was always there???

[archangel]

interesting links

The video says Planet X is a brown dwarf star.

Zacharia Sitchen claims the Sum. tablets say planet X/Nibiru is a planet. not a sun. It is where the Anunaki supposedly come from so the video kind of contradicts what he has to say.

However, the video does make sense.

With all this talk about global warming and the evidence that all other planets are heating up, it does seem logical that this "could" be possible because of an "extra" heat source.

also in the bible, Lucifer is always often referred to as the Morning Star and one who bears the light, just as Jesus is. So it appears that the symbolic meaning of Jesus and Lucifer both point to something similar. "they are both stars""

We all know Jesus is symbolic of the sun but not many seem to be clear what Lucifer is symbolic of. What is said about fits into the symbolic story pretty good. Jesus is the Sun (Good) and Planet X is Lucifer (bad) who is the advisary to the Sun and the earth/mankind.

one problem I've always had with what zacharia sitchen says is that if these anunaki live on this plant X how do they get the sun light or heat b/c they travel so far way from the Sun.

also, these powerful Ifa red telescopes makes you raises an eye brow when you take the above into consideration.

The Brown dwarf star defineately seems like a possibility

[kashmirz]

interesting

[december]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-3RLx_4Y5Y

Does anyone know if this information is correct? Is Nibiru headed our way?

I couldn't find much info on this from google searching

Where is this guy getting his info from.

Is there any connection with the Orion constellation here?

[revolution 9]

I had read a site which claimed Nibiru was destroyed a long time ago, and was why the reptilians came here to begin with.

Also, Lucifer was a human king, not symbolic of anything.

[archangel]

I had read a site which claimed Nibiru was destroyed a long time ago, and was why the reptilians came here to begin with.

Also, Lucifer was a human king, not symbolic of anything.

where is the evidence that Planet X has been destroyed?
How do you explain the gravitational pull upon distant planets
that can not be explained?

Lucifer is a human king? Who was he?

why would the entire new testament be symbolic of astrological events and then they just threw some hidden meaning of a human king in there who is enemy of the SUN??? Who was he and how does he fit into many of the solar god messiah stories?

Why is Lucifer referred to as the morning star?


i'm not trying to pick on you here at all. but if you those claims atleast show some type of hypothetical evidence and you also need to address what I just asked.

[mynameis]

I tried to find the Great Book by name as described in part three and found no references. Second, how did the Jeremiah's destroyer get interpreted as a global event when this prophet spoke nothing of the new world?

The Kolbrin bible as stated is a possible hoax of a modern production without any outside references.

Unfortunately, the Kolbrin Bible has no prevenance beyond that claimed by its publishers. On the Web there is no reference to "The Kolbrin" or "The Bronzebook" other than by the publishers; the official Glastonbury Website makes no mention of this "book" - and does not even mention the possibility of arson in the 12th century fire which supposedly was intended to destroy it. It is eminently probable that "The Kolbrin" is a literary hoax, albeit brilliantly conceived and very well written... and with a remarkably convincing exposition of evolution combined with the will of a God.


To make this more potent it seems that for such an old text nobody except Greg Jenner has written extensively about them since 2005, and neither has any other literate human being since their creation as a reference work or inter-related studies.

I can only conclude that these videos contain farcical information, so what ever floats your boat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolbrin

[revolution 9]

where is the evidence that Planet X has been destroyed?
How do you explain the gravitational pull upon distant planets
that can not be explained?

I'm just saying I read it somewhere, not that I endorse it. I was just throwing another theory into the mix.

Lucifer is a human king? Who was he?

the king of Babylon

why would the entire new testament be symbolic of astrological events and then they just threw some hidden meaning of a human king in there who is enemy of the SUN??? Who was he and how does he fit into many of the solar god messiah stories?

The New Testament was from different sources and a different point of view. The chapter was about the king of Babylon who God had told Isaiah he would throw down:

Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities. For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD.

Destroyed his land and killed his people... the acts of a tyrannical, hubris-filled king. The order to kill his children? A common act during war which the scripture above even explains the logic behind.

Why is Lucifer referred to as the morning star?

In the same way that Louis XIV was called the Sun King. It was a title. The king of Babylon was a tyrant, and an arrogant boastful son of a bitch. He devastated many nations, took an arrogant title, and believed himself to be above even God. That's what I get from Isaiah 14.

i'm not trying to pick on you here at all. but if you those claims atleast show some type of hypothetical evidence and you also need to address what I just asked.

There's no need to apologize for simple debating - sheesh, people are uptight on here. As for "at least show some type of evidence," that part was kind of illogical, since you hadn't asked for any yet.

[december]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-3RLx_4Y5Y

I don't understand one thing about this video - if the planet will become VISIBLE with a naked eye only in few years from now then how did they manage to take a regular picture of it from here?

[revolution 9]

A telescope isn't the naked eye.

[archangel]

thanks for the info.

I just wanted to say i wasn't interogating you. just asking. I'm not uptight at all. But I do know that many people on this board need to be on prozac lol so i was just letting it be known i was just asking out curiosity. I get called many names on here for asking questions.

[archangel]

I don't understand one thing about this video - if the planet will become VISIBLE with a naked eye only in few years from now then how did they manage to take a regular picture of it from here?


It says the picture is take from a very very southern location. It can only be seen by the naked eye in such a spot as of right now. according to the video atleast.

[mr_moon]

I think that Nibiru is operating at a different vibrational frequency, which is why only an Infra red telescope can pick it up... which actually means that it is existing in a different dimension.

[thetonic]

I would certainly think that if like the video says that it can be seen from a southern location (telescope or whatever) then there would be more people researching this and much more talk and debate over this , not just one guy who has some information?:confused:

Good post though..

Brilliant signature by the way Archangel!;):D

[_invisibleplane_]

I am convinced that this planet is real. It has been idolized symbolically through civilization as the flying disc with wings. It explains the asteroid belt(though it could have been blown up). Explains why Antarctica is kept so hush hush. Sitchen has some interesting information to share, but be wary of his overall conclusions, for he treats the reptilian annunaki as good beings, never focusing on instances such as feeding and slaving the race they interbred with.

I think that these earth changes cannot be solely blamed on co2 global warming, or even the sun, though they certainly have their roles. The immense electromagnetic field coming from this planet could very well push the earth into a much anticipated poleshift that seems to happen as often as nibiru passes by/ 3600 years.

I'm also very interested in the zero point theory of the earths rotation speeding up/slowing down through cycles, as it comes to a slow, eventually stops, reverses and spins in the opposite direction. The pole shift can also tie into this.

Native legends speak of a day 3,600 years ago when the sun rose from the west as it had always done, hovered in the sky for more than a full day, and set in the east - but the next day, it rose in the east and set in the west, as it does today. Hebrew traditions speak of this event, also, saying that it happened during a battle. The ancient Hebrews took it as a sign that one side was receiving celestial assistance, because it stayed light long enough for the battle to complete in their favor. We can't verify this in the rock or fossil records, because 3,600 years is too short a period of time for such an event to be reflected there. All we have to go by are traditions, legends, and myths preserved in oral and written documents. What the tradition tells us, however, is that if something like this were to happen, the people of the earth would live through it. It would have to be a really strange day to live through, but if the ancient legends are true, it happened and the people apparently survived. However, we don't know how it affected their lives.

[december]

If you stop the video at 1 min. 23 sec., then you can read this:

"All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is", said Gerry Neugebauer, chief IRAS scientist.

So they don't even know WHAT it is.

http://photos.aip.org/history/Thumbnails/neugebauer_gerry_b1.jpg

Gerry Neugebauer (American scientist)

http://www.britannica.com/eb/topic-410475/Gerry-Neugebauer

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=U-3RLx_4Y5Y

[revolution 9]

...many people on this board need to be on prozac lol ...I get called many names on here for asking questions.

Yeah that was my point, it's sad you had to be all apologetic about asking question because of how touchy people on here are. YOU ASKED A QUESTION! THIS INSULTS ME! YOU FOOL!

[sunyatta60]

I had read a site which claimed Nibiru was destroyed a long time ago, and was why the reptilians came here to begin with.

Also, Lucifer was a human king, not symbolic of anything.

I think you are the victim of disinformation, maybe you need to read Velikovsky and his book Worlds in Collisions.
According to him and Sitchin; Venus (called Lucifer by the Ancients) was a Comet that entered our solar system and in doing so destroyed a planet called Timat that caused the Biblical flood but I digress. The Asteroid belt is what is left of that planet, and there is Scientific evidence for this; type into a search engine Bode's Law and you will assimilate what I mean.
I personally am more inclined to believe that Nibiru is on its way back and that the gods that created mankind are on it. That is the reason for global warming and according to the Mayan prophecies we have only 5 years left on this planet the World as we know it will end on 21st December 2012 so I will celebrate Christmas on the 25th November 2012 assuming I am still here


Reality is an Illusion Albeit a Very Persistent One.
Albert Einstein

[december]

I don't understand one thing about this video - if the planet will become VISIBLE with a naked eye only in few years from now then how did they manage to take a regular picture of it from here?

It says the picture is take from a very very southern location. It can only be seen by the naked eye in such a spot as of right now. according to the video atleast.

Thank you for the answer, Archangel.

You are correct, it does say "from the most southern area of the planet".

Yes, I am NOT referring about a picture which you can see if you stop the video at 03 min. 54 sec. (it says - May 2002. September 2002.).

But I have a question about the picture which was taken, according to the text, "from the most southern area of the planet".


So, let's stop that video at 06 min 00 sec and read what it says:

"The following is a photo taken from a normal person, this shows how Niburi looks now 2007 as seen only in the most southern area of the planet.
Once again, this photo is real."


And at 06 min 05 sec you can see three photos with Sun and some yellow dot on the left.

But!

There is a PALM TREE on these photos! :)
And what is that - a lake (with no ice)?

So if this photos were taken from the most southern area of the planet which is covered with tons of snow and ice then how did the palm tree end up on the photos which were taken, as we are told, in Antarctica?...

http://www.ecoenquirer.com/antarctic-ice.jpg

[archangel]

I noticed the same thing about the photo and that struck me as odd b/c i didn't look like a south pole enviroment.

[december]

I noticed the same thing about the photo and that struck me as odd b/c i didn't look like a south pole enviroment.

Yeah.... The palm trees in the South Pole... :)
I think whoever made that video is a heavy weed smoker...