the worm that turned
25-10-2009, 09:03 AM
Forgive my naivety here but why are we required (by statute) to insure a car instead of the driver?
Surely the car cannot cause loss or harm to someone, only the driver of the car can.
Also, someone with a legal dictionary may be able to help but what is the legal definition (in the UK) of a car? I'm imagining it contains the term vehicle.
BTW - this wasn't set up to discuss the difference between a car (vehicle) and a private conveyance as this is discussed in various other threads. This is set up to discuss car versus driver when talking about insurance.
Surely the car cannot cause loss or harm to someone, only the driver of the car can.
Also, someone with a legal dictionary may be able to help but what is the legal definition (in the UK) of a car? I'm imagining it contains the term vehicle.
BTW - this wasn't set up to discuss the difference between a car (vehicle) and a private conveyance as this is discussed in various other threads. This is set up to discuss car versus driver when talking about insurance.