View Full Version : Interview with David Wilcock (ET, 2012 and more)
bigus_dickus
31-08-2007, 05:56 PM
part 1 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2276698152408766929
part 2 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4353521315087386589
part 3 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3217921898186562496
part 4 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3167469905004278565
pumma
02-09-2007, 12:27 AM
Outstanding - Thank you bigus_dickus! http://www.mysmiley.net/imgs/smile/winking/winking0050.gif
Watching now...
bigus_dickus
02-09-2007, 01:39 AM
i really like this guy, he is pretty amazing :)
lapis
03-09-2007, 12:09 AM
That was really great and I enjoyed seeing him talk. Thanks for sharing that bigus dickus.
loveemotion
03-09-2007, 05:22 PM
loved that.. thank you Bigus!
This guy is great :)
kashmirz
04-09-2007, 05:53 AM
...heh...its like looking into a mirror ... still.. infinant consciousness ...
this has motivated & inspired me to go ahead and make my current works public, i will do so over the next coming days
father_pyramid
04-09-2007, 08:55 PM
this is a great interview, one of projet camelot's best
I don't agree with the idea ascension, or that there will be any noticable change in our consciousness in 2012 like he speaks of in this video, where some will be "left behind" to experience catastrophes, while the rest "ascend" to the 4/5th dimension - even though i would like to believe it. I think if there is a change it'll be so subtle we won't actual notice anything, even though it will change us for the better more and more in the long run, and consquently eventually manifest as the reality we want. I agree with alot of the rest he talks about.
bigus_dickus
05-09-2007, 11:51 AM
I don't agree with the idea ascension, or that there will be any noticable change in our consciousness in 2012 like he speaks of in this video, where some will be "left behind" to experience catastrophes, while the rest "ascend" to the 4/5th dimension - even though i would like to believe it. I think if there is a change it'll be so subtle we won't actual notice anything, even though it will change us for the better more and more in the long run, and consquently eventually manifest as the reality we want. I agree with alot of the rest he talks about.
yeah, me too. on the other hand, he says at some point that "ascension" or "awakening" or whatever we can call it, occurs individually to each person and gradually in small steps. which means that it is not a massive event happening in a short period of time. this is what is revealed in his brother's meditation, after he experienced that ball of light and vortex in his room.
about the "left behind" thing, maybe this is something that happens all the time, even now. think that there may be for example 100 Buddhas living right now on earth among us. well, these people are not more special or somewhere else, but they are buddhas, which means awake and the rest seem to be asleep. a buddha can recognize everyone else, but sleepers don't even recognize themselves. a buddha is in nirvana and a sleeper is in samsara, but they are both in the same place and in one field of consciousness.
nirvana and samsara is the same with heaven and hell for the christians!
clipwip
05-09-2007, 11:43 PM
That was really superb. Thanks for the links! I read a lot of his "Ascension 2000" I think it was called, back in 2003 and that was really the first thing since my fascination with people like Terrance McKenna and hallucinogens had subsided in about 1997 that rekindled my interest in things "unseen." Then I sort of lost interest for a few years until this past 6 months and am now revisiting that point on the quickening spiral of my circle of interests. Definitely time to revisit his work.
clipwip
06-09-2007, 12:23 AM
Also, I love what he says about using his astral projections or lucid dreaming or whatever it was to get laid! :D:D
I have never mentioned that to anyone out of embarrassment, but I lucid dream most of the time, and 60% of it is me trying to get laid!! Yeah, even in my dreams it's hard! :mad:
But, the amazing thing is that it's the same, if not better than real life!
bigus_dickus
06-09-2007, 12:43 AM
I have never mentioned that to anyone out of embarrassment, but I lucid dream most of the time, and 60% of it is me trying to get laid!! Yeah, even in my dreams it's hard! :mad:
hehe, every time i try to do this, it all goes wrong and the most ridiculous stuff happens. and not only sex, the other night i was trying to get myself on a motorbike and go full throttle, i never made it, i fucking skipped the whole ride! :)
clipwip
06-09-2007, 12:50 AM
hehe, every time i try to do this, it all goes wrong and the most ridiculous stuff happens. and not only sex, the other night i was trying to get myself on a motorbike and go full throttle, i never made it, i fucking skipped the whole ride! :)
No shit! I have some menial amount of control, but it varies widely and generally, I can only merely react to situations I find myself in. I've become pretty good at controlling flight, but that's about it. Whatever is producing the vast scenes and characters with all of their unanticipated behavior is a complete mystery to me. Also, I can't run or punch people the way I want. I also have a constant theme of needing sophisticated weaponry. Maybe I should find some sort of psychoanalyst. My therapist is a fucking drug pusher with no clue.
cruise4
06-09-2007, 02:47 PM
Good Stuff! One of the, possibly first, thing I ever read about this sort of topic was Edgar Cayce Sleeping Prophet. Gone Full circle. I'm not sure about this 'free will' thing and handing out 9/11 /wake up kind of material. I had no qualms earlier on... but now I'm a bit unsure. How do others see this predicament... am I interfering in others free will by trying to help them wake up?
And loving Bush is a non starter!
bigus_dickus
06-09-2007, 03:43 PM
I'm not sure about this 'free will' thing and handing out 9/11 /wake up kind of material. I had no qualms earlier on... but now I'm a bit unsure. How do others see this predicament... am I interfering in others free will by trying to help them wake up?
my opinion is, that you don't interfere with anyone's will by handing out material, because this is, well, your free will to do so.
but insisting by attacking their egos and hating them for not listening and coming into conflict with them, whoever they are, may be the kind of interfering that defeats its purpose. it approximates proselytizing and manipulation.
so, the idea is, to never stray your mind from peace and harmony. otherwise, maybe you are accomplishing the opposite of what you have intended. you surely wouldn't want anyone trying to "brainwash" you with their ideas if you didn't like these ideas, or didn't feel a necessity of altering your own.
And loving Bush is a non starter!
yeah, this looks kinda foul doesn't it. again, the idea is not to run up to him and give him hugs and kisses, or say "it's ok, let him do what he wants, i don't care", but a) do not fear him (or anyone) and b) do not hate him (or anyone).
for example, you see a friend of yours making a mistake, which you know that it is a mistake, but he doesn't. you don't go on hating your friend for making the mistake, but you love him without being hostile towards him, even if he is hostile to you.
the idea is, love yourself and be in peace with yourself first, then do the same with others. you don't kiss and hug yourself when you love yourself, you are just grateful and harmonious and forgive yourself for your own errors. the same applies for everyone else. :) if you can't forgive them, it's OK, but that's no reason to fear or hate them. it doesn't mean it's bad to do so, but talking about evolution of consciousness, it doesn't help, it defeats the purpose.
lostinstrangeworld
07-10-2007, 11:21 AM
I don't know what date this thread was posted as I found it through the search. But I must say, when a friend gave me the link to those videos the other day, I was amazed!
Well worth watching.
I only recently found Project Camelot. The first interview I watched was David Wilcock because I was somewhat familiar with him. And I must say it was a truly wonderful interview. A friend clued me in to Edgar Cayce when I was 21 - I'm 62 now. There were many years in between where I was NOT searching and only in the last several years I've been hunting all I can find. David's was so enlightening ~
Anna