View Full Version : Did anyone watch Question Time last night?
freedom1st
16-10-2009, 06:11 PM
About 15 minutes from the end somebody asked a question about Afghanistan. What amazed me was the desperation from the Labour and Tory MP's on the panel. They are obviously under strict instructions to back the Afghan war and to increase the troops along with keeping it going for as long as possible (gotta get that opium). The excuses they came out with and how they put them across were unbelievable. One of them said if we don't stay and increase the troops we'll end up with Afghani's all over the UK - it was just so unconvincing. Anyway, what really shocked me was a member of the audience who stated he was from Afghanistan and he believed the British should stay there and should send more troops. I thought at first....well, maybe he has a personal reason for thinking that way but then as he went on I suddenly realised that he was a plant - his English was too good and the way he expressed himself (vocabulary and sentence structure) was not what you would expect from someone who had lived most of his life in Afghanistan. It was the most obvious plant I have ever seen. To be honest I've never even suspected a plant on Question Time before (maybe there have been but it's never been obvious to me - not like this one). And it worked, coz the audiance applauded him (they hadn't applauded any other pro-Afghanistan points before that). All the world's a stage and 'they' are obviously desperate to go to these lengths because they know the public are not with them on this. Believe me, they are pulling out all the stops on this one.
What a f*cking joke! Even if you buy the official version of 9/11, you would have to accept that 14 out of the 19 so called plane hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and that no Afghani's were involved (even Osama is Saudi). Of course they say that the terrorists were trained in Afghanistan and that is why we are there. Funny how the Russians and the British have been trying to take Afghanistan for years now - this is just the latest excuse.
Anyway, see what you think:-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n9p81/Question_Time_15_10_2009/
Go from about 15 minutes from the end.
diamond dogs
16-10-2009, 06:20 PM
About 15 minutes from the end they somebody asked a question about Afghanistan. What amazed me was the desperation from the Labour and Tory MP's on the panel. They are obviously under strict instructions to back the Afghan war and to increase the troops along with keeping it going for as long as possible (gotta get that opium). The excuses they came out with and how they put them across were unbelievable. One of them said if we don't stay and increase the troops we'll end up with Afghani's all over the UK - it was just so unconvincing. Anyway, what really shocked me was a member of the audience who stated he was from Afghanistan and he believed the British should stay there and should send more troops. I thought at first....well, maybe he has a personal reason for thinking that way but then as he went on I suddenly realised that he was a plant - his English was too good and the way he expressed himself (vocabulary and sentence structure) was not what you would expect from someone who had lived most of his life in Afghanistan. It was the most obvious plant I have ever seen. To be honest I've never even suspected a plant on Question Time before (maybe there have been but it's never been obvious to me - not like this one). All the world's a stage and 'they' are obviously desperate to go to these lengths because they know the public are not with them on this. Believe me, they are pulling out all the stops on this one.
What a f*cking joke! Even if you buy the official version of 9/11, you would have to accept that 14 out of the 19 so called plane hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and that no Afghani's were involved (even Osama is Saudi). Of course they say that the terrorists were trained in Afghanistan and that is why we are there. Funny how the Russians and the British have been trying to take Afghanistan for years now - this is just the latest excuse.
Anyway, see what you think:-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n9p81/Question_Time_15_10_2009/
Go from about 15 minutes from the end.
I remember some years back (must be about ten years ago..prob the last time I watched the prog) there was a guy 'in the chair' on Blind Date (I think he said he was a property developer) and shortly afterwards there he was (prominantly placed in the audience) 'picked out' asking a question on Question time.. I never thought too much about it at the time but now realise it's all a load of organised cr@p.. hence ditching the TV ages ago...
Big Brother is watching you...in your front room!!
largejack
16-10-2009, 07:13 PM
About 15 minutes from the end somebody asked a question about Afghanistan. What amazed me was the desperation from the Labour and Tory MP's on the panel. They are obviously under strict instructions to back the Afghan war and to increase the troops along with keeping it going for as long as possible (gotta get that opium). The excuses they came out with and how they put them across were unbelievable. One of them said if we don't stay and increase the troops we'll end up with Afghani's all over the UK - it was just so unconvincing. Anyway, what really shocked me was a member of the audience who stated he was from Afghanistan and he believed the British should stay there and should send more troops. I thought at first....well, maybe he has a personal reason for thinking that way but then as he went on I suddenly realised that he was a plant - his English was too good and the way he expressed himself (vocabulary and sentence structure) was not what you would expect from someone who had lived most of his life in Afghanistan. It was the most obvious plant I have ever seen. To be honest I've never even suspected a plant on Question Time before (maybe there have been but it's never been obvious to me - not like this one). And it worked, coz the audiance applauded him (they hadn't applauded any other pro-Afghanistan points before that). All the world's a stage and 'they' are obviously desperate to go to these lengths because they know the public are not with them on this. Believe me, they are pulling out all the stops on this one.
What a f*cking joke! Even if you buy the official version of 9/11, you would have to accept that 14 out of the 19 so called plane hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and that no Afghani's were involved (even Osama is Saudi). Of course they say that the terrorists were trained in Afghanistan and that is why we are there. Funny how the Russians and the British have been trying to take Afghanistan for years now - this is just the latest excuse.
Anyway, see what you think:-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n9p81/Question_Time_15_10_2009/
Go from about 15 minutes from the end.
Never suspected a plant? it's a fucking allotment.
frase
17-10-2009, 02:00 AM
Never suspected a plant? it's a fucking allotment.
Bloody hell....I thought the same thing at the time.....listening to Alan Johnson reel off the well rehearsed line 9/11, 7/7, 21/7, lucozde Bottles etc etc.....
Because there is a boogeyman in a cave etc....
but it was so apparent in Conservative and labour reaction....
The guy in the audience was an agent I reckon.
God damn BBC.....They are a sinister corporation indeed......
QT isnt even filmed live either...Filmed an hour or 2 in advance just in case anyone exposed 9/11 or something....
Why watch question time in the first place when all they can question are lies then more lies in lies effect happens and people belive there lie is greater.Turn the tv off best advice.
basel
17-10-2009, 07:33 AM
sort of makes your sick in the stomach, i feel they always use plants. thats why i stopped watching the tv, cause when you sit down and really think about it, you're missing nothing
steppewar
17-10-2009, 08:11 AM
The Lab/Con argument about Afghan terrorists on the streets of London blowing up stuff if the USA/UK pull out of Afghanistan was so laughably bullshit, I nearly fell off my seat in disbelief when I heard this.
As the Taliban control 90% of Afghanistan at the time of typing, this fact alone proves the ConLab view to be a total lie.
Most of the so called terrorists reside in Pakistan, so why don't we invade this country?
The real reasons why the 'Allies' are in Afghanistan are to ...
1) Secure and protect the Caspian oil pipeline.
2) Protect the poppy/opium fields so the CIA can continue to finance its Black Ops.
3) Continue the never ending perceptual fear of terrorist attacks against the West, by stationing a permanent armed force in the 'terrorists' countries, to protect us (the West) from future terrorist attacks.
sithnemesis
17-10-2009, 09:17 AM
Why watch question time in the first place when all they can question are lies then more lies in lies effect happens and people belive there lie is greater.Turn the tv off best advice.
Well said
Politicians are fucking Psychopaths...
Only a psychopath (an-empty-predator-wannabe) who can convincingly (lie) show deep concern and vulnerability with a straight face to the sheeple while fucking them from behind at the same time.
The Elite love Psychopaths... Psychopaths will never turn against them... They would never dare as that would be too predictable... If they did they would take the fall first and hunted down, torn to pieces by other psychopaths.
The police, the army, the mafia, gangs, terrorists, political parties, management, boards, committees, commissions, councils, bands, groups... all recruit the most vile psychopaths to screw the sheeple into trance, submission, abuse and slavery.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44854000/jpg/_44854287_74ef805b-6168-42e7-8a32-b8d127befc8f.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d6/The_Queen_movie.jpg http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/putinahmadinejad.jpg http://reversethinking.typepad.com/weblog/images/2007/11/11/hyde.jpg http://www.ugo.com/movies/psychopaths/images/entries/image_splash.jpg http://www.dannyhaszard.com/psychopath.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2082/1808708814_3bf040802c.jpg http://www.devilhalloweencostumes.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Devil-Angel-Plus-Adult-Costume1.jpg http://2.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kpzm10QBSK1qz9tieo1_400.jpg http://lodim.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/cirque-du-freak-vampires-assistant-poster.jpg
largejack
17-10-2009, 09:25 AM
I watched it a few weeks ago for the first time in years and never again. One politician was talking about the official story of 911 to remind us why we should remain in Afghanistan and he looked as guilty as hell (and rather nervous I thought) as he spoke.
He needn't have worried though...
grachtengordel
17-10-2009, 09:26 AM
what really shocked me was a member of the audience who stated he was from Afghanistan and he believed the British should stay there and should send more troops. I thought at first....well, maybe he has a personal reason for thinking that way but then as he went on I suddenly realised that he was a plant - his English was too good and the way he expressed himself (vocabulary and sentence structure) was not what you would expect from someone who had lived most of his life in Afghanistan. It was the most obvious plant I have ever seen. To be honest I've never even suspected a plant on Question Time before (maybe there have been but it's never been obvious to me - not like this one)
well spotted sir. thanks for flagging this up, once it is pointed out, thier tricks become so obvious.
illuminumnuts
17-10-2009, 10:13 AM
The Lab/Con argument about Afghan terrorists on the streets of London blowing up stuff if the USA/UK pull out of Afghanistan was so laughably bullshit, I nearly fell off my seat in disbelief when I heard this.
As the Taliban control 90% of Afghanistan at the time of typing, this fact alone proves the ConLab view to be a total lie.
Most of the so called terrorists reside in Pakistan, so why don't we invade this country?
The real reasons why the 'Allies' are in Afghanistan are to ...
1) Secure and protect the Caspian oil pipeline.
2) Protect the poppy/opium fields so the CIA can continue to finance its Black Ops.
3) Continue the never ending perceptual fear of terrorist attacks against the West, by stationing a permanent armed force in the 'terrorists' countries, to protect us (the West) from future terrorist attacks.
Plus, loot all the countries they are in with like minded psychopaths from that country and roger the tax payers at home harder through private contractors helping with their noble military effort. :)
Quite possible the Afghan guy was a plant. I watch the show regularly and did know it was filmed a little in advance. You never ever hear deep questions on 9/11 and 7/7. It must be speedily edited by some stooge. If even the BNP manage to get on, then why don't these views get aired? Maybe we need to query who edits it and what their remit is? I'm sure more people have such questions than support the BNP.
Anyhow, as everything they do is purely in the interest of the 'Defence Of The Realm', benefiting all of us and no cronyism involved, we should just be thankful and go home. :rolleyes:
MI5 and MI6 should be fukking ashamed of themselves. Why don't they keep files on these mofos and take them all down? They are just dogsbodies of Bush, Blair et al.
freedom1st
17-10-2009, 01:23 PM
Never suspected a plant? it's a fucking allotment.
I agree with you, but what I meant was that it has never been so obvious that someone was a plant.
freedom1st
17-10-2009, 01:23 PM
The Lab/Con argument about Afghan terrorists on the streets of London blowing up stuff if the USA/UK pull out of Afghanistan was so laughably bullshit, I nearly fell off my seat in disbelief when I heard this.
As the Taliban control 90% of Afghanistan at the time of typing, this fact alone proves the ConLab view to be a total lie.
Most of the so called terrorists reside in Pakistan, so why don't we invade this country?
The real reasons why the 'Allies' are in Afghanistan are to ...
1) Secure and protect the Caspian oil pipeline.
2) Protect the poppy/opium fields so the CIA can continue to finance its Black Ops.
3) Continue the never ending perceptual fear of terrorist attacks against the West, by stationing a permanent armed force in the 'terrorists' countries, to protect us (the West) from future terrorist attacks.
Spot on!