View Full Version : Madonna about to adopt a second Malawi orphan
Madonna is set to adopt a 13-month-old Malawian orphan called Mercy, it has been claimed.
The singer is reported to have been given permission to take the little girl as a sister to David Banda, who she adopted from the country last year.
Madonna met 10 girls at the Kondanani Orphan Care Centre at Blantyre last October before deciding and, according to sources, "had her heart set" on another girl, Grace, until the child's extended family objected.
Now the star has been told she can adopt Mercy instead, and will file papers next February before taking her home two months later.
It follows months of legal wrangling over the adoption of David, which will not be finalised until January. There was controversy after it emerged that David's father, Yohane, was still alive.
A family source said: "Madonna's over the moon that she's been told she can take Mercy. She didn't want another complicated adoption.
"Mercy is a beautiful baby girl. She's so joyful and happy and giggles every time she's picked up.
Madonna just loves the way she claps her hands and laughs constantly. She has huge, dancing eyes. Madonna calls her her smiling angel."
graflok
30-08-2007, 02:22 AM
Poor kid.
astraltraveller
30-08-2007, 05:12 AM
why dont the old slapper give money to the pearants so they can keep thier children and be able to support them if she is so careing , it all seems very selfish to me and is maybe only thinking of her own happiness and trying to boost her image as some kind of savior and green goddess with her save the planet stage performance highlighted by mr dalooze and all the people dumbed down to the level of a plastic turd are buying it . im not religious but she reminds me of the whoor of babylon and fear these kids might get brainwashed or something . a bitch like that wouldnt think twice about tossing a kid in molech,s belly at bohemian grove .
trumansho
30-08-2007, 05:33 AM
I wonder what's the fascination with white people and adoptinng black babies these days?
trumansho
30-08-2007, 05:40 AM
Anyone see roots? when the slave master was dying and had a black child sit on his back I wonder what's behind that symbolism.
http://www.tehutionline.com/newpage31.htm
reptilianshapeshifter
30-08-2007, 07:50 AM
i suppose it's a no win situation. If Madonna was adopting white american babies you'd all be saying "why isn't the racist bitch adopting africans or asians when there's so much poverty and need over there!"
there's always something for someone to get upset about. Even when it doesn't concern them.
astraltraveller
30-08-2007, 08:41 AM
why doesnt it concern us when we are truth seekers trying to expose evil currupt bitches like her .
astraltraveller
30-08-2007, 08:45 AM
when freeman from the freeman perspective or mathew delooze and david icke and others try to expose maddona its fine but no not us ,lets all go back to sleep and leave it to the experts even though they keep telling us to try waking people up .
reptilianshapeshifter
30-08-2007, 09:02 AM
Who said it was fine? You want me to start a pointless thread criticising David Icke for mentioning Madonna?
Madonna is hardly the cog in the wheel of depriving human freedom, unless she is adopting babies to keep in a dungeon somewhere.
Seriously, she's a freaking pop singer for christ sake. You lot would be better off buying People magazine or something if you want to keep up with the latest celeb goss.
Truth of the matter is you know fuck all about her. She could be a loving and generous person who gives babies good homes for all you know. but it doesn't really fit in with your illuminati/satanic kabal /ritual view of reality, does it?
astraltraveller
30-08-2007, 05:49 PM
no one asked you to slag of icke or anyone but you dont have a problem doling it to us . you know nothing of maddona iether and who said she is the main cog in the weel . thiers hundreds of posts here that are not the main cog in the weel iether so why dont you go pick on those peoples threads aswell . i only whantd to post one comment and not get too deeply into this as i have other more serious things to be doing , so i whont be comming back to this thread , ive already spent more time on it than i whantd too , have fun misenterpreting peoples motives and telling them what to think and what to say just like aq real reptilianshitshaper . conform conform conform .
astraltraveller
30-08-2007, 06:18 PM
before i go ile leave this
http://matthew-delooze.blogspot.com/2007/07/you-say-shes-virgin.html
would a nice loving careing person be part of this duping millions of unsuspecting people into giving up spiritual energy and saping it from them . its a good job not everyone isnt duped and dumbed down to the level of a plastic turd from a joke shop .
maybe she doesnt eat babies but i sertainly wouldnt let someone like her who thinks nothing of fooling millions of peace loving people to participate in an evil ritual look after my children or i would be called iresponsible by people who are not dumbed down . the shitshapers dont whant you to make connections or discuss things like this . dont be afraid to speak people , dont let the shitshapers controle you and you have already won your argument because you know the truth . rite i whont be back to this thread , im too busy reading about celeb breast implants and wot not , not .
reptilianshapeshifter
30-08-2007, 06:49 PM
lol
notaslave
30-08-2007, 06:59 PM
i suppose it's a no win situation. If Madonna was adopting white american babies you'd all be saying "why isn't the racist bitch adopting africans or asians when there's so much poverty and need over there!"
there's always something for someone to get upset about. Even when it doesn't concern them.
Well actually I think what the rich do, does concern the poor. We are not commodities to be bought and sold. Rich people's play things, regardless of our race.
The child she bought before had living family. Her money would have been better used helping the entire village. I believe she made a donation to the orphanage. The child plucked from poverty and premature death certainly to grow up in god only knows what kind of home, but most celebrities and their children end up snorting coke. And I would say the little boy is a prime candidate, for the press will never forget (nor let him) where he came from.
If the rich want to ease their conscience then spend their wealth on entire villages not screwing up one persons mind. This is a fashion statement.
reptilianshapeshifter
30-08-2007, 07:14 PM
so what's the cut off point money-wise when people can't do what others do and should instead fund a village's money situation?
I like the way when astratraveller doesn't get a reply in a thread he makes that agrees with him he resorts to insults and telling me to conform. so typical :D i think conforming is not being able to come up with opinions that don't match the consensus of the peer group you surround yourself with at the time.
notaslave
30-08-2007, 07:23 PM
so what's the cut off point money-wise when people can't do what others do and should instead fund an village's money situation?
You should never take children away from their cultural roots - black, white or any colour inbetween.
Most adopted people seek out their roots when they are old enough to do so.
As for the cut-off point financially, I believe adoptions should be dealt within their communities. Where possible children who are adopted should be adopted within their local communities. There is enough wealth in the world for this to be achievable. In such case as Madonna her community of interest would be mega rich celebrities and as they dont tend to HAVE to give up their children then mega rich celebrities either have their own children or support poor communities.