Have you seen the google page

[biblegirl]

Sorry this totally freaked me out, doh!

http://www.google.com/logos/barcode09.gif

hopefully they have more anniversary logos that have nothing to do with the conspiracy world :p

first result:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113481781&ps=cprs
"This DNA marker we call a 'DNA bar code,' " Kress says. "We have to locate it on a certain part of the genome, but it's variable enough that it's different for all species."

While Kress refers to it as a "bar code," it isn't an actual UPC sticker like you'd find at the store. It's something that already exists within the plant's DNA.

"We have to sequence that DNA to actually identify the plant," Kress says. "We're not there yet in terms of me picking a leaf off the ground and telling you immediately from its DNA bar code what that is. We would have to take it back to the lab, sequence it. But technology is heading in the direction where we expect [that] what now sits on top of a desk as a DNA sequencer will eventually fit in the palm of your hand."

[goldenbear]

wtf.!that is all i can say.i have just woken up to see the barcode on the google page.i nearly wet my pants.

[amethyst2009]

The barcode is 57 years old today, what a strange number to 'celebrate'!

[gilly]

The barcode is 57 years old today, what a strange number to 'celebrate'!

That was your 57th post. Spooky! :D

[fedora]

wtf.!that is all i can say.i have just woken up to see the barcode on the google page.i nearly wet my pants.

I saw it too. I thought it was a glitch or mistake as the webmaster might have been in the middle of changing the banner or something.

[1ndividua1]

That was your 57th post. Spooky! :D
Synchronicity

[vetis]

wtf.!that is all i can say.i have just woken up to see the barcode on the google page.i nearly wet my pants.

do we need one of these posts every time google puts up a damn logo? Here is a noob tip, mouse over it or click on it IT TELLS YOU WHAT ITS FOR!!!

[bluehorseman]

do we need one of these posts every time google puts up a damn logo? Here is a noob tip, mouse over it or click on it IT TELLS YOU WHAT ITS FOR!!!

Yeah but dont all bar codes equal 666 using numerology, hence google are pasting that number all over the web and look - I just typed it onto this site.

[anthony65]

Yeah but dont all bar codes equal 666 using numerology, hence google are pasting that number all over the web and look - I just typed it onto this site.

But this version of the bar code doesn't have the 666 separators.

Were they added later?

Why have them at all? Especially the middle one!

[farros]

do we need one of these posts every time google puts up a damn logo? Here is a noob tip, mouse over it or click on it IT TELLS YOU WHAT ITS FOR!!!

Well said.

[breezinreezin]

Don't you think Google personnel do these things as a wind up. I bet they're now checking into Ickeforums, and all the other conspiracy sites and having a wry laugh at the responses.

[phildee3]

Yes.
What's the big deal??

[nicolaj]

I bet the elite loves this site.. I know I do..its a scream..:D

[fork]

Just because it tells you what it signifies when you mouse over it does not mean that the symbolism does not hold other meanings to them.

It is strange to celebrate a 57th anniversary. Heinz 57. Passenger 57. Can anyone think of more 57's :)

[nicolaj]

Don't you think Google personnel do these things as a wind up. I bet they're now checking into Ickeforums, and all the other conspiracy sites and having a wry laugh at the responses.

they don't really have to..this forum is the funniest I've ever read..:D

its so entertaining..

[deem]

Just because it tells you what it signifies when you mouse over it does not mean that the symbolism does not hold other meanings to them.

It is strange to celebrate a 57th anniversary. Heinz 57. Passenger 57. Can anyone think of more 57's :)

Wow! Spooky man. I've got 57 pairs of Simpson socks, Which is 114 individual socks. And 114 minus 57 is = ........ WTF!!!??!!!.....:eek::rolleyes:

[richardhastings]

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp71/richardsladehastings/barcode09.gif


great post :)

[astrochicken]

Yeah but dont all bar codes equal 666 using numerology, hence google are pasting that number all over the web and look - I just typed it onto this site.


No.

This is the google barcode .


http://www.google.com/logos/barcode09.gif


In the below example the first, center and last are sixes.


http://www.indexoftheweb.com/images/Barcode2.bmp

[farros]

Don't you think Google personnel do these things as a wind up. I bet they're now checking into Ickeforums, and all the other conspiracy sites and having a wry laugh at the responses.

I want to know what connotations a barcode has with conspiramedia to warrant the OP's hysteria.

[dangermouse]

I want to know what connotations a barcode has with conspiramedia to warrant the OP's hysteria.

i bet its wisely bear from the telegraph :P

[rich157]

i bet its wisely bear from the telegraph :P

Agent 57 is the name of the master of disguise in the television series Dangermouse. :D

[icecoldmeltz]

But this version of the bar code doesn't have the 666 separators.

Were they added later?

Why have them at all? Especially the middle one! It does' if you look sideways

[blood money]

yeh this caught me too

[fuzzylogic]

But this version of the bar code doesn't have the 666 separators.

Were they added later?

Why have them at all? Especially the middle one!
They are different barcode formats.

Not 100% sure without reading it, but I'm guessing that Google's barcode is Code39 format.

The barcode format that people worry about is UPC.

And the 666 stuff is crap anyway.

[11indigo11]

Today is the 57th anniversary of the first patent on the bar code.
EVERY SINGLE BARCODE ON EARTH HAS 666 IN IT!!!
THEY ARE SHOWING US THAT THEY ARE RUNNING THE SHOW!

http://api.ning.com/files/wfPUAGrWPOTLpNGPvp8yKsj6GKGT0G*xVOHctY1Pk-85SWEIi3zOEQymmnjOnqkcD8yx3DlbKoKqPr0-6YepsTTEySk3ykBf/barcode666.jpg

http://www.av1611.org/666/barcode.html

[ytch]

So what´s it all about?

[king_felix]

I almost got a heartattack when I just went to google.
That barcode creeps me out

[fuzzylogic]

They are different barcode formats.

Not 100% sure without reading it, but I'm guessing that Google's barcode is Code39 format.

The barcode format that people worry about is UPC.

And the 666 stuff is crap anyway.
I was close.

It's code128 format.

[anthony65]

They are different barcode formats.

Not 100% sure without reading it, but I'm guessing that Google's barcode is Code39 format.

The barcode format that people worry about is UPC.

And the 666 stuff is crap anyway.

Yep, it appears to be UPC. I wasn't aware that there were so many versions of the barcode.

What do find crap about 666?

That the UPC bar code includes a 666?

Or the esoteric interpretations of 666?

Do you know the revelations quote about not being able to buy or sell without the mark of the beast, which is 666?

Revelation 13:16-18 (New International Version)
16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,

17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.


50 years ago these passages would have been impossible to understand. Now we are being told of a cashless society.

And who could have imagined RFID implants?

Still crap?

[fuzzylogic]

What do find crap about 666?
They aren't 6s.

If they were 6s, how would the reader know if it was reading the start, middle or end of the barcode or if it was reading a character 6?

[anthony65]

They aren't 6s.

If they were 6s, how would the reader know if it was reading the start, middle or end of the barcode or if it was reading a character 6?

Here is a website that looks at the 666 barcode controversy:

http://www.av1611.org/666/barcode.html

Is the number 666 "hidden" in the UPC barcode?

One of the most popular and shocking accusations concerning the number "666" is that the number "666" is quietly "hidden" in every UPC barcode. Mary Stewart Relfe's book, "The New Money System 666", published in 1982, is the "pioneer" of the "666 in the UPC barcode" teaching. Relfe's book contains over 50 pages of excellant doumentation on the UPC barcodes. Relfe's discovery is repeated in many publications touching the mark of the beast, within the last fifteen years. Including tracts published by this author.

Here's a few samples:


Terry Cook, The Mark of the New World Order, 1996:
". . . the entire system [UPC barcode] is very deceptively designed around the infamous numerical configuration, Biblically known as 666, the mark of the Antichrist or devil (Revelation 13:16-18). . ." (Terry Cook, The Mark of the New World Order, 1996, p. 376)

Bob Fraley, The Last Days in America, 1984:

"The interpretation of the Universal Product Code marks is most revealing in that the three numbers '666' are the key working numbers for every designed Universal Product Code. Every group of Universal Product Code marks has in it three unidentified numbers. All three of these numbers are 6, making the use of the numbers '666' the key to using this identifying marking system. . .

There is no deviation. Every Universal Product Code has three unidentified marks whose number equivalent '6' encoding it with the code number '666'. " (Bob Fraley, The Last Days in America, 1984, p. 225, 228)

Here's how to "discover" the "hidden 666 in the UPC barcode".

The "hidden" 666 in the Barcode



Notice the three "guard bars" (colored RED) at the beginning, middle and end. Now, notice the same bar pattern ("bar-space-bar" or "101") for the number 6 (colored BLUE).

By "looking" at the above barcode, the number "666" clearly, appears to be there. . .

But is it?

Is the number 666 TRUTHFULLY "hidden" in the UPC barcode?

Technically, no it is not.

Here's the "technical" truth. . .

The number 6 and the three guard bars are NOT the same. They do "appear" to be identical, but they are different.


GUARD BARS AND THE NUMBER 6 B M 6
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

101 01010 1010000

Notice. The beginning and ending guard bars are "bar-space-bar" or "101" (the B in the above table). The middle guard bar is "space-bar-space-bar-space" or "01010" (the M in the above table). The number six is "1010000" (the 6 in the above table). Remember, technically a barcode number consists of seven units. The beginning and ending guard bars are only three units, and middle guard bar is only five units.

So, technically, from a computer's perspective the number "666" is NOT in the UPC barcode.

But. . .

Look again. . . All three guard bars contain the pattern "bar-space-bar" or "101". There is only ONE number, in TWENTY numbers (remember right and left numbers have different patterns) that contains the "101" pattern and that number is the right code SIX. Not the number one, or two, or three, etc. — but ONLY the right code SIX. I do seem to remember something about a mark on the RIGHT hand (Rev. 13:16).

Technically, from a computer's perspective the number "666" is NOT in the UPC barcode. . . but from a human's perspective — YES, the "appearance" of 666 is there!

What does the inventor of the UPC barcode say about the number "666" in the UPC barcode?

The inventor of the UPC barcode is George J. Laurer. In 1971, while Mr. Laurer was an employee with IBM, he was assigned the task "to design the best code and symbol suitable for the grocery industry". In 1973, Mr. Laurer's UPC barcode entered the world, and the rest is history.

On Mr. Laurer's web site, he has a "Questions" page, where he answers various questions about the UPC barcode. On the "Questions" page, Mr. Laurer answers the "666" question, as follows:

Question #8 - Rumor has it that the lines (left, middle, and right) that protrude below the U.P.C. code are the numbers 6,6,6... and that this is the international money code. I typed a code with all sixes and this seems to be true. At least they all resemble sixes. What's up with that?
Answer- Yes, they do RESEMBLE the code for a six. An even parity 6 is:

1 module wide black bar 1 module wide white space 1 module wide black bar 4 module wide white space

There is nothing sinister about this nor does it have anything to do with the Bible's "mark of the beast" (The New Testament, The Revelation, Chapter 13, paragraph 18). It is simply a coincidence like the fact that my first, middle, and last name all have 6 letters. There is no connection with an international money code either. (From website)

Even, Mr. Laurer, the inventor of the UPC barcode admits, "Yes, they do RESEMBLE the code for a six."

In fact, as we've documented — SIX is the ONLY number they could RESEMBLE.

You would certainly think because of the "antichrist connections" to "666" they would have picked another number besides '6' to pattern the three 'guard bars' after? Why not 1 or 3, or 5, etc. — any number but '666'. Surely they knew Christians would, sooner or later, "discover" the clear "appearance" of 666 in the UPC bar code.

Maybe they had no choice?

Is the barcode the mark of the beast?

In the 1993 British movie, Naked, directed by Mike Leigh and starring David Thewlis, the following conversation takes place:

"What is the mark? Well the mark Brian, is the barcode. The ubitiqous barcode that you'll find on every bog roll, and every packet of johnny's and every poxie-pot pie. And every [expletive-removed] barcode is divided into two parts by three markers and those three markers are always represented by the number six. Six-six-six. Now what does it say? No one shall be able to buy or sell without that mark. And now what they're planning to do in order to eradicate all credit card fraud and in order to precipitate a totally cashless society. What they're planning to do; what they've already tested on the American troops; they're going to subcutaneously laser tattoo that mark onto your right hand or onto your forehead." (Naked, British movie, 1993, directed by Mike Leigh and starring David Thewlis)
There's no question Mary Stewart Relfe, author of When Your Money Fails, The "666" System" is Here, and The New Money System 666, believes the barcode is the Mark of the Beast.


Mary Stewart Relfe, When Your Money Fails…The "666" System" is Here, 1981


"And he causeth all . . . to receive a mark . . . "
In Greek this word mark is charagma, which literally denotes a stamp, an impress, and is translated mark. Notice that John did not say that he causeth all to receive a number in the right hand or forehead. This astute prophet could have certainly delineated between a series of numbers, and an unexplained stamp or mark. . .
The same Electronic Eye which scans the UPC marks [barcodes] will in the near future scan the marks that will be required to be inserted on the body. . .

While some specifics remain vague, of this we are certain: All commerce will be conducted in the near future with a number, a name, or an identifying mark in the hand or forehead. It is my sincere deduction that the 'mark of the beast' will not be the insertion of numbers per se on the body, but of vertical lines which will represent encoded messages and digits. " (Mary Stewart Relfe, When Your Money Fails The "666" System" is Here, 1981, pp. 56,57,58)

Mary Stewart Relfe, The New Money System 666, 1982


"The Prophet John identified this Cashless System of Commerce 1900 years ago as one in which business would be transacted with a 'Mark' and a Number; the Mark will obviously be a Bar Code; the Number will be '666;' the combination of the two, about which you will read in this book, will be an integral part of the '666 System'. . .
RECEIVING OF ONE'S OWN VOLITION THE MARK (BRAND) IN THE RIGHT HAND OR FOREHEAD; which I believe will be a Bar Code facsimile incorporating a concealed use of '666,' unintelligible to the eye,. . ." Mary Stewart Relfe, The New Money System 666, 1982, pp. xii, 206)

A bizarre coincident? concerning the barcode is the Greek word charagma translated 'mark' in Revelation. Here's how Robert Van Kampen, in The Sign describes this coincident:
"It is interesting to note that the Greek word translated 'mark' is charagma which comes from the Greek word charax, which means 'a palisade, like a picket fence.' When one realizes that this specific word was used back in the first century, and we see today the use of the computer-related bar code, we find the possibilities becoming more than a reality in our day and age." (Robert Van Kampen, The Sign, 1992, p. 231)
Here's the explanation: The Greek "root" word for charagma (translated "mark") is charax. One of the meanings of charax is "a palisade" which is like a "picket fence, or vertical lines". The "idea" is, the reason John used the Greek word charagma, rather than stigma, etc., is because he was describing a 'mark' with vertical lines — a "bar code".

But is all this true?

Well, sort of. . .

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, defines the word charagma as:


5480 charagma, khar'-ag-mah; from the same as 5482 (charax) a scratch or etching, i.e. stamp (as a badge of servitude), or sculptured figure (statue): — graven, mark.

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, defines the "root" word charax as:

5482 charax, khar'-az from charasso (to sharpen to a point; akin to 1125 through the idea of scratching); a stake, i.e. (by impl.) a palisade or rampant (military mound for circumvallation in a siege):—trench.
Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language (a must have for any serious Bible student!) defines palisade as:

PALISADE, A fence or fortification consisting of a row of stakes or posts sharpened and set firmly in the ground. In fortification, the posts are set two or three inches apart, parallel to the parapet in the covered way, to prevent a surprize.
Does all this "prove" John is describing a "barcode"?

No. Of course not. It's a long and rocky road to travel from "charagma" to a "barcode".

Is the barcode the mark of the beast?

Probably not.

A bar code would make a poor candidate for the mark of the beast for the following reasons:

The mark is described specifically in Rev. 14:11 as "the mark of his name". Even the wildest imagination would have a very hard time turning a "barcode" into "the mark of his name".

In the world of "high-level" security and identification, a barcode is not reliable enough. The reason for the "self-check" digit on the barcode is the probability of the scanner misreading the barcode. The next time you go through the grocery line count how many "beeps" or misreads the cashier gets.

Because the human skin stretches, it would be virtually impossible to get the precision needed for a "reliable" barcode. The skin continually stretches with age, weight, wetness, sun exposure, etc.

There is much more reliable and easier to implement technology than barcodes, such as biometric IDs or even biochips.

A barcode does not match the Bible's description of the Mark of the Beast. See What is 666: The Mark of the Beast? for more info.
Porter Lee Corporation has invented a barcode system for the identifying and recording evidence for law enforcement officers. The title of the system is interesting — BEAST — Bar coded Evidence Analysis Statistics and Tracking.

A fascinating development took place recently. On March 2, 1999, patent 5,878,155 was issued to Houston inventor Thomas W. Heeter described as a "Method for verifying human identity during electronic sale transactions".

Heeter's patent "abstract" reads:
"A method is presented for facilitating sales transactions by electronic media. A bar code or a design is tattooed on an individual. Before the sales transaction can be consummated, the tattoo is scanned with a scanner. Characteristics about the scanned tattoo are compared to characteristics about other tattoos stored on a computer database in order to verify the identity of the buyer. Once verified, the seller may be authorized to debit the buyer's electronic bank account in order to consummate the transaction. The seller's electronic bank account may be similarly updated."

Heeter's invention is aimed toward the booming world of Internet E-commerce. In the very near future, many products will be purchased E-commerce via the Internet. WorldNet Daily writes, ". . . Internet e-commerce figures spiraling upward, and the European market expected to surpass the U.S. online community in a couple of years, potential sales online have been projected to reach nearly $1 trillion by 2003." (WorldNet Daily, September 30, 1999)

Is the barcode paving the road to 666: the Mark of the Beast?

Yes. The barcode undoubtedly is paving the road for 666: the Mark of the Beast.

The barcode did something very important to help bring in 666: The mark of the Beast. . .

The barcode opened the door (in fact, it not only opened it, it kicked the door down) to the "digital world". Everything is now a number. Everything gets a barcode. As someone truly said, "If it exists, bar code it". I remember when barcodes first started appearing. I began telling people back then, the barcode was preparing the world for 666: the Mark of the Beast. Was I ever laughed at. . . even by the Christians. I can still remember their laughing and ridicule, "You mean to tell me, everything is getting one of those "marks". You mean, I'll go even to the local "7-Eleven" and they'll have laser scanners and they'll scan these "marks". No way. It would be too obvious what was happening. Everybody would know the mark of the beast is coming".

But isn't it amazing 25 years later. . . and nobody gives the "mysterious" barcodes even a "second thought".

Satan very carefully and subtlety (see Genesis 3:1 and 2 Cor. 11:3) indoctrinated us to our wonderful, convenient, new "digital world".


And the road to 666 is just ahead. . .

[fuzzylogic]

So what's your take on 666 being in UPC barcodes after reading that?

[anthony65]

So what's your take on 666 being in UPC barcodes after reading that?

Too much for me to read, I though you might do the honours... :p

Just kidding...

I'd say it is 666.

But that it isn't the mark of the beast.... yet...

And the revelation passages are amazing. Most prophecies are vague, but this is incredibly specific.

[let it shine]

Revelation 13:16-18 (New International Version)
16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,

17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.

the mark is either in the swine flu vaccine or it's the metal bracelet that comes with it.

but yeah...my heart skipped a beat when i saw the barcode.

[biblegirl]

This is some very important information, I hope anyone who doesn't realize the significance of the bar code reads this post.

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3739/malefemaleenergyoz0.jpg

The male energy is represented by vertical lines. The female energy is represented by horizontal lines. Part of the spell on humanity has been the contamination of everything we eat, drink, wear, read, etc. with the bar code symbol. It is a sneaky way tptb use to get our consent to give power to this symbol/number/energy. We see it so much we barely notice that everything we buy at the store has a bar code on it. This is just one more aspect of the male energy being promoted, while the female energy is suppressed, causing an imbalance in the planet's vibration. It's their magic creating turbulence in the energies here, and no I am not amused when google celebrates it like it's something cute.

Yes the bar code is also a disguise for 666, which is further driving the magic of the number of male energy.

So yeah it's creepy when you open up a search page and have a giant bar code staring back at you. :p

[beldazar]

Good post Biblegirl, thankyou :)

[glacidtek]

bible girl.... where are those illustrations from?

just wondering..... the male wave is showen as many waves in tandem.... the female as a single wave.

since the female is an octave higher, it has a higher frequency..... this illustration shows the female with a much higher AMPLITUDE.

I think this is not showen to scale.

ie. the female should also have many waves in tandem.... just at a higher frequency.

thus both would be seen as being horizontal... but female at higher frequency??????????????

[biblegirl]

do we need one of these posts every time google puts up a damn logo? Here is a noob tip, mouse over it or click on it IT TELLS YOU WHAT ITS FOR!!!

Thanks for that groundbreaking revelation, allow me to get on my knees and begin chanting "we're not worthy" :D.

If you read the OP, I provided the first link that came up when i clicked on it, which highlighted DNA and the bar code...I thought some people might be interested in that.

Don't you think Google personnel do these things as a wind up. I bet they're now checking into Ickeforums, and all the other conspiracy sites and having a wry laugh at the responses.

Maybe. That possibility doesn't stop me from starting a thread on it though :p.

[biblegirl]

Google's new logo is a barcode which, as far as we can tell, says "Google." Today is the 57th anniversary of the first patent on the bar code. Inventors Norman Woodland and Bernard Silver filed the patent on October 1949, and it was granted, No. 2,612,994 (pdf), on October 7, 1952. The original patent was for a system that would encode data in circles (a bulls eye pattern), so that it could be scanned in any direction (see this interesting article for more history).

The barcode on the Google homepage is Code 128 encoded, which is a standard way of encoding ASCII character strings (ie. A-Z, a-z, 0-9, etc.) into a barcode. It would be safe to assume that Google used their own open source barcode project, ZXing, to generate the barcode. The same library is used in Android for barcode recognition.

The barcode is a technical innovation that has become an often unnoticed, yet essential, part of modern day life. The format is a global standard, where a scanner from any manufacturer can interpret almost any conforming barcode from anywhere (assuming it can interpret the encoding format ¿ which is UPC in the case of products, and Code128 or something else for other applications, depending). The barcode is a great example of why uniform protocols and standards serve a greater good for everybody, and the same lesson certainly applies to the web.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/07/AR2009100700130.html

wow.

[biblegirl]

bible girl.... where are those illustrations from?

just wondering..... the male wave is showen as many waves in tandem.... the female as a single wave.

since the female is an octave higher, it has a higher frequency..... this illustration shows the female with a much higher AMPLITUDE.

I think this is not showen to scale.

ie. the female should also have many waves in tandem.... just at a higher frequency.

thus both would be seen as being horizontal... but female at higher frequency??????????????

edit: found it

whether it's shown to scale or not I don't know, this is what is said to be the appearance of it:

Female energy appears as an “S” shaped movement that runs down the field. Male energy appears more like rain flowing almost straight down the field. www.ascendpress.org/.../InnerFamily.htm

[glacidtek]

biblegirl - I'm not having a go BTW - i'm interested in wave theory, and have studied accoustics.

thanks.

[phildee3]

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3739/malefemaleenergyoz0.jpg



How were these frequencies measured?
What is vibrating exactly?
What are the frequencies in Hz?

Or is this bollux?

[biblegirl]

biblegirl - I'm not having a go BTW - i'm interested in wave theory, and have studied accoustics.

thanks.

i'm actually interested in what a diagram would look like that would show the vibrations to scale

i found the source of that photo and modified my reply on that page to include it ;)

[glacidtek]

http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/media/Communications/frequency.gif

this shows a high freq wave and a lower freq wave...... the amplitude (diffrence between highest and lowest point) is the same for each wave..... there are more complete cycles per second in the higher freq.

if this was transfered to the original illustration, the woman would be covered with the same number of waves as the man.... but each wave would be a higher frequency.

hope that helps?

[anthony65]

How were these frequencies measured?
What is vibrating exactly?
What are the frequencies in Hz?

Or is this bollux?

The frequencies were measured with sexual organs.

What was vibrating? :rolleyes:

What frequencies in Hz? Who cares

Is it bollux? They do play a role. :p

Hmmm that curvy lady energy looks good! :)

[phildee3]

http://www.qrg.northwestern.edu/projects/vss/docs/media/Communications/frequency.gif

if this was transfered to the original illustration, the woman would be covered with the same number of waves as the man.... but each wave would be a higher frequency.



Huh?

Double the frequency means twice the number of waves per unit of time (time being the graph's horizontal axis).

In the above illustration the frequency of the upper waveform is six times that of the lower one - six times the number of waves.

Two waveforms drawn to scale, one of which is twice the frequency of the other, would show a ratio of 2:1 between them where the above shows a ratio of 6:1.

[amethyst2009]

That was your 57th post. Spooky! :D

It's like the film 'the number 23!'.........well apart from the number of course :D

[phildee3]

What frequencies in Hz? Who cares



To make a statement that female vibrations are twice those of a man's depends on measurements having been taken.
Frequency is measured in Hertz (waves per second).

Who cares??
Anybody who is interested in the factuality of the statement!

[glacidtek]

Huh?

Double the frequency means twice the number of waves per unit of time (time being the graph's horizontal axis).

In the above illustration the frequency of the upper waveform is six times that of the lower one - six times the number of waves.

Two waveforms drawn to scale, one of which is twice the frequency of the other, would show a ratio of 2:1 between them where the above shows a ratio of 6:1.

your missing the piont - I'm talking about the number of waves shown in tandem on the original illustration..... ie. many on the man.... one on the woman.

NOT the cycles per second.

please re-read my post..... I'm highlighting the fact that the AMPLITUDE of the wave on the female does not match that of the male.

because of this lack of scale, the illustration is inacurate.

[runciter]

Just because it tells you what it signifies when you mouse over it does not mean that the symbolism does not hold other meanings to them.

It is strange to celebrate a 57th anniversary. Heinz 57. Passenger 57. Can anyone think of more 57's :)

i can give you a heinz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger#Personal_background

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=heinz%20kissinger&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

[phildee3]

your missing the piont - I'm talking about the number of waves shown in tandem on the original illustration..... ie. many on the man.... one on the woman.

NOT the cycles per second.

please re-read my post..... I'm highlighting the fact that the AMPLITUDE of the wave on the female does not match that of the male.

because of this lack of scale, the illustration is inacurate.



Gotcha!

but this only helps point to the fact that post no 35 makes no sense.
No disrespect, biblegirl, but wtf is it saying???

[glacidtek]

phildee -

she said previously she coppied it over because she thought it was relavent....

and also previosly asked if anyone could explain the inconcistancys:

i'm actually interested in what a diagram would look like that would show the vibrations to scale

i found the source of that photo and modified my reply on that page to include it ;)

thats all I was trying to do - trying to make it clearer to her.

I know a little, but I'm not an expert.... maybe there is a better way to explain what I was trying to say?

[biblegirl]

Straight vertical lines, columns, obelisques, etc. are symbolic of the male energy, and when they are used for magical purposes by tptb, it sets off the balance of male and female energies.

The bar code is another way to contribute to this imbalance. It uses the symbolic vertical lines along with numerical code 666 to promote the male energy.

The female energy naturally vibrates at a higher frequency, so the suppression of this energy is limiting people on earth as a whole from accessing the higher dimensions, and instead controlling them in a low vibrational state.

[fork]

i can give you a heinz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger#Personal_background

http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=heinz%20kissinger&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi


I knew when I thought of the Heinz 57 thing and passenger 57 thing it was for a reason. Kissinger and terrorism. Hand and glove.;)

[phildee3]

The female energy naturally vibrates at a higher frequency, so the suppression of this energy is limiting people on earth as a whole from accessing the higher dimensions, and instead controlling them in a low vibrational state.



What is the frequency (in vibrations per second?).
How is it suppressed without suppressing it's octaves?

My understanding of how we are suppressed by waveforms is by the bombardment of dissonant frequencies. If the male and female frequencies are octaves of one another then they are consonant, and any dissonant frequencies will negatively affect them equally.
I don't think we need to vibrate at a high frequencies in order to access higher dimensions - only at consonant frequencies. Sadhus in deep meditation have lowered their vibrational rate but are able to access the higher realms through harmonic resonance (ie. sympathetic vibration).

[anthony65]

To make a statement that female vibrations are twice those of a man's depends on measurements having been taken.
Frequency is measured in Hertz (waves per second).

Who cares??
Anybody who is interested in the factuality of the statement!

Phildee: My post number 45 was made in lighthearted vain. I thought that was obvious? It's an interesting topic and I actually am interested in the frequency question.

[phildee3]

Phildee: My post number 45 was made in lighthearted vain. I thought that was obvious?



Well, it was obvious that most of it was, - that's why I ignored it.

"Who cares?" (about measurements) was not so obvious. Sorry.

[camreeno]

Barcodes look kind of disgusting. I can't help but think of them as prison bars or something.

[biblegirl]

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/3997/pict0346rev0.jpg (http://img188.imageshack.us/i/pict0346rev0.jpg/)

[biblegirl]

I searched "Bar code" and my eye caught something interesting.

See the arrows. http://ethericwarriors.com/ip/viewtopic.php?t=2048


http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/7564/google666.png

[suicidal_martyr]

http://ethericwarriors.com/ip/viewtopic.php?t=2048


http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/7564/google666.png

Says this now, Results 1 - 10 of about 96,700,000 for bar code [definition]. (0.12 seconds)

[biblegirl]

Says this now, Results 1 - 10 of about 96,700,000 for bar code [definition]. (0.12 seconds)

wow, how did they lose 600 million results over the past few weeks?? lol

[suicidal_martyr]

wow, how did they lose 600 million results over the past few weeks?? lol
Dunno, strange stuff. Check it again it will say something different I bet. That is messed up, though. 666,000,000 results.

[element]

I'm getting 23 million results.
edit: 95 million for bar code, I did barcode before, my mistake..:o

Someone at google must've had a bizarre sense of humour that day.