Blue (ROYAL ) Blood ?!?!?!?

[jovichmk]

the royal family have a Blue Bload
thats the phrase that we can usually meet in moovies books, on TV
Is this BLUE blood have some connections with a reptiles( or grays maybe )
this is a big sign
what they mean with that
Anyone ??

[2013]

rhesus negative blood is a type that is very rare about 5% of the population have it although according to this site it is very strong in the basque peoples .It is also suposed by some to be ancient egyptian atlantian blood type or alien /gods blood, search the web for more info
http://www.greatdreams.com/reptlan/rhneg.htm
:D
egyptianalienmonkeyblood.The people i know who have it seem to be very intuitive wether they belive it or not .

[cf24]

I believe they have a higher copper content in their blood, and when this oxidizes it turns a blue colour.....

[2013]

its 15% apparently according to this site .
http://the-red-thread.net/blood.html
makes interseting reading this is another of the links i have just read not my own opinion i am still reading will post more later on the subject if needs be:D

[whitelightrabbit]

i believe it's still red, just a blueish tinge to it.

[december]

the royal family have a Blue Bload
thats the phrase that we can usually meet in moovies books, on TV
Is this BLUE blood have some connections with a reptiles( or grays maybe )
this is a big sign
what they mean with that
Anyone ??

The phrase a blue blood was invented by the non-white people. When they saw the white people for the first time they were surprised to see the blue veins under a white skin.

Just take a look at your arms - the veins are very visible and they do look blue.

[lostinstrangeworld]

Actually, my blood is definitely red :D

It was a pain being RH negative after giving birth and in pregnancy- not having any veins close to the skin in my arms made me feel like a pin cushion! They were like vampires trying to get at my blood! They have to test the blood for anti-bodies if you are RH negative in and after pregnancy, then you get this jab (from blood donors- 'anti D' its called) if required.

[lostinstrangeworld]

What I would like to know, is whether this factor is derived from Reptilian DNA or other DNA? Egyptians/ Atlanteans were mentioned.......

[lostinstrangeworld]

If it is remnants of Reptilian DNA, I must say, I am one of the furthest things you can get from 'them'......always been highly sensitive & empathic. I'm also extremely squeamish- maybe due to the empathic nature? So perhaps it is something else?

[woghd]

Horshoe crabs have blue blood because of the copper. It's true, google it.
Archangel

[2013]

If it is remnants of Reptilian DNA, I must say, I am one of the furthest things you can get from 'them'......always been highly sensitive & empathic. I'm also extremely squeamish- maybe due to the empathic nature? So perhaps it is something else?

http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/965/krishnaxw8.jpg

blue blood's i recal reading or hearing info about some of the pleiadeans being reptillian , ithink the icke stuff has put a negative spin on all things reptillian , just because our reptillian brain function is the lowest and most basic part of us doesnt mean that any or all reptillian beings are negative or controlling the same as all humans arent .:D

[lostinstrangeworld]

All mammals have a reptilian part of the brain, don't they?

[lostinstrangeworld]

"Man is the dream of the dolphin".....

http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x268/AmelieJolie7/SubPageDolphin.jpg

In 'truth vibrations' it mentions that dolphins are the link between this world and the next; they are a level above humans in evolution. Humans are so wrapped up in their own illusion of superiority that they ignore the diamonds of wisdom that the purer spirit of nature has to offer.

[lostinstrangeworld]

'Reptilian humanoids' might well exist and be evil as the research appears to conclude,

But we must ask ourselves-

Is the way human beings treat animals in animal testing laboratories, factory farms and slaughter houses, etc......

Any less worse than the Reptilian's treatment of humans?(!)

[2013]

the perception of aliens experimenting on us and doing research harvesting DNA etc is probably a form of psychosis mirroring our own treatemnt of the natural world , alienating ourselves from the natural world and setting oursleves up as supreme beings , thereby being taken and used in the very same way .We are all mirrors for each other and what we see in others is the thing we love and hate in ourselves ,in our nature:D

[lostinstrangeworld]

Or could it be karma?

[2013]

Karma karma karma karma karma chameleon
You come and go
You come and go
Loving would be easy if your colors were like my dream
Red, gold and green
Red, gold and green
:mad::):D

[2013]

got to get to bed now karma is making me think of korma ,
food or sleep food or sleep ?? how many times have you wrestled with that dilema and dont bother dialing emma she's no help :D

[synergy777]

some indians have rh negative blood, especially north indians/panjabi. my family, from the paternal/male side has it. i used to give blood at uni, they gave me red plastic donor card, which has your blood group on it. i don't give blood, now, due to well, unhealthy lifestyle. my brother gives blood though.

the pleiadeian aspect is interesting though, as for krishna, it could be due to his etheral/dark brown-black skin. its nothing to do with reptiles etc, thats just nonsense. its to do with genetics.

bloodline/genetics/dna activation is the next step.

[synergy777]

http://www.indmedica.com/journals.php?journalid=3&issueid=6&articleid=101&action=article

Indian Journal for the Practising Doctor
All Medical Journals

Issues

Contents

Editorial Board
& Information
PDF Issue

Association Homepage
Pregnancy in the Rh-negative Woman

[synergy777]

http://www.spiritconnectionstore.com/blood-types-alien-connection.htm

Blood Types in Connection to the Alien Phenomenon
by Patty Stevenson



Of the human blood types, O is the most common. It is a universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two groups, negative and positive. This is called the RH factor. The RH factor is the Rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) blood factor. If your blood tests positive for this, you have the factor in your blood. If you test negative, you do not have the factor in your blood. The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.

http://www.michaelbradley.info/

The Iceman Inheritance
There's a little Neanderthal in a lot of us (August 29, 2006).

Bradley wrote in The Iceman Inheritance that the slightly larger brains, on average, of modern Western humanity seem to be a part of the Neanderthal genetic legacy. But the even larger brains and slightly higher IQ of Far Eastern peoples may have another genetic source.

But, unfortunately, slightly larger brains are not the only evidence of Neanderthal heritage in Western humanity.

There are other intellectual, emotional and philosophical characteristics in the genetic package of the Neanderthal heritage. These are: a mentality that gives a numerical and materialistic emphasis to "intelligence"; little or no visual artistic ability; anti-feminist and anti-sexual emotions and social orientation; sexual mutilation as an expression of "religious" affiliation; extremely strong in-group cohesion; high aggression against all other groups and a tendency toward fanatical monotheism in "religions" that Neanderthal-descended people invented.

These characteristics are obvious from the geographical evidence of the last Neanderthal refuge -- the Caucasus (hence "Caucasian"), Elburz, Taurus, Zagros and Hindu Kush Mountains of the Middle East.

[synergy777]

http://www.abcpsychic.com/rhneg.html

[synergy777]

http://www.abcpsychic.com/humangene.html

The Case of Adam's Alien Genes
April 3, 2001 07:41 CDT


Dr. Zacharia Sitchin

In whose image was The Adam - the prototype of modern humans, Homo sapiens - created?

The Bible asserts that the Elohim said: "Let us fashion the Adam in our image and after our likeness." But if one is to accept a tentative explanation for enigmatic genes that humans possess, offered when the deciphering of the human genome was announced in mid-February, the feat was decided upon by a group of bacteria!

"Humbling" was the prevalent adjective used by the scientific teams and the media to describe the principal finding - that the human genome contains not the anticipated 100,000 - 140,000 genes (the stretches of DNA that direct the production of amino-acids and proteins) but only some 30,000+ -- little more than double the 13,601 genes of a fruit fly and barely fifty percent more than the roundworm's 19,098. What a comedown from the pinnacle of the genomic Tree of Life! Moreover, there was hardly any uniqueness to the human genes. They are comparative to not the presumed 95 percent but to almost 99 percent of the chimpanzees, and 70 percent of the mouse. Human genes, with the same functions, were found to be identical to genes of other vertebrates, as well as invertebrates, plants, fungi, even yeast. The findings not only confirmed that there was one source of DNA for all life on Earth, but also enabled the scientists to trace the evolutionary process, how more complex organisms evolved, genetically, from simpler ones, adopting at each stage the genes of a lower life form to create a more complex higher life form, culminating with Homo sapiens.

The "Head-scratching" Discovery

It was here, in tracing the vertical evolutionary record contained in the human and the other analyzed genomes that the scientists ran into an enigma. The "head-scratching discovery by the public consortium," as Science termed it, was that the human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree. How did Man acquire such a bunch of enigmatic genes? In the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates (such as the lineages of yeast, worms, flies or mustard weed - which have been deciphered) to vertebrates (mice, chimpanzees) and finally modern humans, these 223 genes are completely missing in the invertebrate phase. Therefore, the scientists can explain their presence in the human genome by a "rather recent" (in evolutionary time scales) "probable horizontal transfer from bacteria."

In other words: At a relatively recent time as Evolution goes , modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of Life, but horizontally, as a sideways insertion of genetic material from bacteria… An Immense Difference Now, at first glance it would seem that 223 genes is no big deal. In fact, while every single gene makes a great difference to every individual, 223 genes make an immense difference to a species such as ours.

The human genome is made up of about three billion neucleotides (the "letters" A-C-G-T which stand for the initials of the four nucleic acids that spell out all life on Earth); of them, just a little more than one percent are grouped into functioning genes (each gene consists of thousands of "letters"). The difference between one individual person and another amounts to about one "letter" in a thousand in the DNA "alphabet." The difference between Man and Chimpanzee is less than one percent as genes go; and one percent of 30,000 genes is 300.

So, 223 genes is more than two thirds of the difference between me, you and a chimpanzee!

An analysis of the functions of these genes through the proteins that they spell out, conducted by the Public Consortium team and published in the journal Nature, shows that they include not only proteins involved in important physiological but also psychiatric functions. Moreover, they are responsible for important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA - the so-called "Eve" DNA that humankind inherited only through the mother-line, all the way back to a single "Eve." That finding alone raises doubt regarding that the "bacterial insertion" explanation.



A Shaky Theory

How sure are the scientists that such important and complex genes, such an immense human advantage, was obtained by us-"rather recently"-through the courtesy of infecting bacteria?

"It is a jump that does not follow current evolutionary theories," said Steven Scherer, director of mapping of the Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine. "We did not identify a strongly preferred bacterial source for the putative horizontally transferred genes," states the report in Nature. The Public Consortium team, conducting a detailed search, found that some 113 genes (out of the 223) "are widespread among bacteria" - though they are entirely absent even in invertebrates. An analysis of the proteins which the enigmatic genes express showed that out of 35 identified, only ten had counterparts in vertebrates (ranging from cows to rodents to fish); 25 of the 35 were unique to humans. "It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from human to bacteria," Science quoted Robert Waterson, co-director of Washington University's Genome Sequencing Center, as saying. But if Man gave those genes to bacteria, where did Man acquire those genes to begin with?

THE ROLE OF THE AUNNAKI

Readers of my books must be smiling by now, for they know the answer. They know that the biblical verses dealing with the fashioning of The Adam are condensed renderings of much much more detailed Sumerian and Akkadian texts, found inscribed on clay tablets, in which the role of the Elohim in Genesis is performed by the Anunnaki - "Those Who From Heaven to Earth Came."

As detailed in my books, beginning with The 12th Planet (1976) and even more so in Genesis Revisited and The Cosmic Code, the Anunnaki came to Earth some 450,000 years ago from the planet Nibiru - a member of our own solar system whose great orbit brings it to our part of the heavens once every 3,600 years. They came here in need of gold, with which to protect their dwindling atmosphere. Exhausted and in need of help in mining the gold, their chief scientist Enki suggested that they use their genetic knowledge to create the needed Primitive Workers. When the other leaders of the Anunnaki asked: How can you create a new being? He answered:

"The being that we need already exists; all that we have to do is put our mark on it."

The time was some 300,000 years ago.

What he had in mind was to upgrade genetically the existing hominids, who were already on Earth through Evolution, by adding some of the genes of the more advanced Anunnaki. That the Anunnaki, who could already travel in space 450,000 years ago, possessed the genomic science (whose threshold we have now reached) is clear not only from the actual texts but also from numerous depictions in which the double-helix of the DNA is rendered as Entwined Serpents (a symbol still used for medicine and healing) -- see illustration 'A' below.

When the leaders of the Anunnaki approved the project (as echoed in the biblical "Let us fashion the Adam"), Enki with the help of Ninharsag, the Chief Medical Officer of the Anunnaki, embarked on a process of genetic engineering, by adding and combining genes of the Anunnaki with those of the already-existing hominids.

When, after much trial and error breathtakingly described and recorded in antiquity, a "perfect model" was attained, Ninharsag held him up and shouted: "My hands have made it!" An ancient artist depicted the scene on a cylinder seal (illustration 'B'). And that, I suggest, is how we had come to possess the unique extra genes. It was in the image of the Anunnaki, not of bacteria, that Adam and Eve were fashioned.

A Matter of Extreme Significance

Unless further scientific research can establish, beyond any doubt, that the only possible source of the extra genes are indeed bacteria, and unless it is then also determined that the infection ("horizontal transfer") went from bacteria to Man and not from Man to bacteria, the only other available solution will be that offered by the Sumerian texts millennia ago.

Until then, the enigmatic 223 alien genes will remain as an alternative and as a corroboration by modern science of the Anunnaki and their genetic feats on Earth .

ZECHARIA SITCHIN

© Z. Sitchin 2001

[synergy777]

http://www.discoveriesinmedicine.com/Ra-Thy/Rh-Factor.html

Rh factor

Medic1Direct - UK Supplier of Lec & Labcold Blood Banks, under £2000! (www.medic1direct.co.uk)

BloodBankTalk - A free community for Blood Bankers Forums, classifieds, reviews ... (www.bloodbanktalk.com)

Blood Type - The web's top sites for: Blood Type (www.scan4info.net)

Rh factor is also called "Rhesus factor" because it was first discovered in the blood of Rhesus monkeys (small monkeys from India often used for experimentation). Rh factor is an antigen, a substance which stimulates the production of antibodies to fight foreign invaders, such as viruses, bacteria and transplanted organs. A given individual either has the antigen already in their blood (they are Rh positive), or they don't (they are Rh negative). A patient's Rh status effects how he or she handles blood transfusions or organ transplants.

History
Prior to the twentieth century, blood and its function was poorly understood. In trying to solve the problem of serious blood loss from injuries, doctors tried to inject (transfuse) blood from another person or animal into the injured patient. In some cases, this worked and the patient recovered. In many more cases, however, the blood transfusion actually harmed the patient, often causing death. No one could predict which type of reaction would occur as a result of a blood transfusion. So, by the beginning of the nineteenth century, most European nations had outlawed the practice of blood transfusion.

About 1900 Austrian-American physician Karl Landsteiner (1868-1943) developed an explanation for the phenomenon of blood rejection. Landsteiner found that human blood serum (the liquid portion of blood surrounding the cells) could be divided into four categories, depending on its ability to cause clotting of red blood cells. He gave these groups the names A, B, AB, and 0 based on what type of clotting antigen they had, if any.

In 1940 Landsteiner discovered another of blood factor antigen, known as Rh. This discovery resulted from Landsteiner's studies with Rhesus monkeys. Landsteiner and his colleagues found that when blood from monkeys was injected into rabbits and guinea pigs, it clotted. This was because of the presence of another antigen that the researchers had not classified before. Landsteiner called this antigen the Rh (Rhesus) factor. Researchers also showed that the factor occurs among some, but not all, humans. It is also inherited.

Importance of Rh Factor
The Rh discovery had immediate practical importance because it explained a relatively common medical disorder known as erythroblastosis fetalis. In this condition, an Rh-negative woman who becomes pregnant with an Rh-positive fetus (an unborn child) sometimes develops anti-bodies against the Rh factor in the fetus. This development usually causes no problem during the woman's first pregnancy, since the number of anti-bodies produced tends to be small.

By the time a second pregnancy occurs, the situation has changed. The number of Rh antibodies produced by the mother's body has become large enough to cause destruction of red blood cells in the fetus. This can result in complications such as anemia (a chronic blood condition characterized by lack of energy), jaundice (a condition in which bile pigments build up in the blood and cause skin, eyeballs and urine to take on a sickly yellow tone) or premature birth. Today, this reaction can be controlled by immunizing Rh negative women after their first pregnancy with a drug known as RhoGam.

User Contributions:
The following comments are not guaranteed to be that of a trained medical professional. Please consult your physician for advice.

[synergy777]

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=947219

Rhesus Negative blood has reportedly been linked with high IQs and psychic experiences, a questioning nature and a sense of alienation. This of course is most probably speculation, but they are true in my case, admittedly.
But it is being hypothesized that this completely different kind of blood, is the missing link.. that we are actually descending from extra terrestrials.
Indulge me in this case, I realise of course that this node shall rest under the label of "pseudoscience" but then, I am not claiming this to be real. I am recounting other people's "theories" no matter how far off they may seem.

Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They of course have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthropoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey. It has been proven that around 85% of mankind has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive (Rh+). This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.

In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combinations of traits inherited from all our ancestors. (Nothing more and nothing less.) Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past. All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. This leads to the question of where the Rh negatives come from. If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?
..and this is where the speculation comes in.
look away now, oh critical noder!

All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and colour makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child. Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an alien substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.

Another question which springs to mind is, why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry. Where did this tradition come from? People speckled throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why? How important could this have been to primitive cavemen, struggling to survive, to chart their genealogy? They had no understanding of modern genetics and inheritance. So why should they preserve their genealogy? Were they told, by the `ancient astronauts', to preserve their heritage, until a future date when they would return and it would be understood?

The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition have been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if they were the same type blood? The aggulation (clumping) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye. It is said that they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other tribes, scattered throughout the earth. Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy. Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand. It is feasible that we are that generation.

For many years people have been searching for the wrong thing. The true "missing link" could be man himself. The unknown link between earth and the stars - hybrid man. Man may be the missing link between primate and extraterrestrial. Jesus stated that the Father and him were one. This could be taken quite literally. He may have been an exact duplicate of his (our) ancient Father. He may have even been a clone of the cosmonauts. Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention. This could have been the implanting of a clone into Mary's sterilised egg.

A good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars". He has documented many of the characteristics we may have received from our cosmic ancestors. It does suggest quite strongly that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.



based on information from:
http://www.iufod.com/_ufo_news/ancient_astronauts/Rh%20Negative%20blood%20and%20aliens.html


its official, i'm a space cadet, lol

[synergy777]

http://groups.msn.com/StarChildren/rhnegativeblood.msnw

Rh Negative Blood

This article was re-produced here on StarChildren by kind permission of the author, Betty Matterson Rhodes. It's content, although similar in many ways to the content articles on StarChildren, does not necessarily reflect it's views on the origins of this blood type. The author argues the case for Rh Negative blood belonging to Adam & Eve. Derek A. Jones, the author of StarChildren however, tries to make the connection of this blood type to only one tribe of Israel -that tribe being Levi, the third son of Leah & Jacob. Rh Negative, if an Adam & Eve trait, would be more popular than 15%. It is during the Exodus, that the tribe of Levi became an offering and possession to the being that created Israel. For further information, read the articles written by the author Derek A. Jones on StarChildren.

DEREK A. JONES.

Written by Betty Matteson Rhodes

1. Basques (Spain): 35% Rh-negative

2. Whites: 15% Rh-negative

3. Blacks: 8% Rh-negative

4. Native Americans: 1-2% Rh-negative

5. Asians: 2% Rh-negative

RH Negative Factor by Hiberia

Nearly 85% of all human beings have RH positive blood. Their red blood cells contain a substance called the RHesus blood factor. This means the positive blood contains a protein that can be traced to the Rhesus monkey. It is acknowledged that blood factors are transmitted with more exactitude than any other human or animal characteristic. It is not known from where the negative rh factor derived.

The highest concentration of RH negative blood occurs in the Basque people of Northern Spain and Southern France, and in the Eastern/Oriental Jews. Only 15% of the entire world's population are known to have the RH negative blood factor. While it is known that RH negative blood - (type 'O') is the purest blood known to mankind, it is not known from where the negative factor originates. The majority of people, especially the native people of the Americas have type 'O' blood, except the Blackfoot Indians who have 82% type A blood. These native people are the only tribe to have this high concentration of A blood - most other American Indians have 80% type 'O'. It is the rh negative factor that makes the blood 'pure'. Pure enough to be the universal blood of the world. Everyone on the face of the earth can receive rh negative type 'O' blood, but these very same 'O' negative people cannot receive blood from any other type except their own type. The three types are 'O', 'B', 'A' and a fourth - a combination of 'AB'.

Rh negative blood indicates no protein connections to the Rhesus monkey, whereas rh positive blood does carry protein linked to the Rhesus monkey - hence the 'rh', i.e. rhesus. Blood type 'O' is the most common. Blood type 'A' is next, and blood type 'B' is after that. Blood type 'AB' is the least common. It is very rare for even as many as 10 percent of a population to be of blood type 'AB'. When we seperate the types into 'negative' and 'positive' we find that 'O' negative (the universal donor blood) constitutes less than 7% of the world's population. Science at this very time is attempting to make the recipe for rh negative 'O' blood, but without success. The protein in positive blood can be cloned, but not so of the negative blood - which is quite interesting. If the rh negative factor does not derive from any known earthly link - from where did it originate? Perhaps Zechariah Sitchen would be able to tell us. He would no doubt say it is from the 'gods'. What the big boys say is that the rh-negative factor is a mutation of unknown origin which happened a few thousand years ago. These 'negative' blooded people spread heavily into the area of what is now Spain, England, Ireland, France and later into America, Canada and Australia. A faction of 'O' negative people can be found amongst the Basque peoples. They contain the largest concentration of known 'O' negative blooded people today because, they for the most part, have confined themselves to one area, whereas the Celtic people have branched out among all the new world.

It is evident that Adam and Eve had rhnegative blood - the type would have to be 'O', because Adam was created perfect and that would mean the 'purest' blood. Eve would definitely have the same blood as well. Eve's 'sin' was committing adultry with an 'outsider' (yes there were other humans on the earth when Adam and Eve were placed here). Eve's sin resulted in the birth of Cain - with positive blood - his father perhaps a Blackfoot Indian with 'A' positive type blood (see chart above). Descendants of Cain were sent out from Adam and Eve into the land of 'Nod' - (America?). Or maybe Cain's father was a 'Lapp' who again had A+ blood. Cain's family were sent into 'Nod' which could mean the extreme north - a good place to send Cain, and America wouldn't be much of a punishment. The Blackfoot Indians do have the highest concentration of 'A' blood, however. The descendants of Cain would have confined themselves from the outside races of people because they were 'marked' in some way and were fearful of death if they ventured out into the world.

Blood was, and still is, sacred to the God of Israel. When the Israelites were kept in the wilderness for forty years (a biblical generation), perhaps it was to cleanse their blood. After many years of inner-marriages with A+ and B+ blood types their once pure bloodline was becoming corrupt. This once 'clean' breed of people were instructed to marry only within the other Israelite tribes, thus preventing contamination of their blood line by producing only RH 'O' negative children. The Israelites were given a 'promise' land after their long quarantine in the wilderness, but only the younger generations were allowed to enter the promise land - those under the age of twenty who were born in the wilderness with two negative Israelite parents. When these younger Israelites were set free to go down to the promise land they were instructed not to marry outside their own tribes, and strict hygienic instructions were imposed upon them as well. But eventually the Israelites scattered in all directions marrying other than Israelite spouses, and the positive blood in all types soon took over and today 85% of humans are positive.

An RH negative pregnant mother's body will reject her positive blooded baby in the womb. Her body fights the RHesus factor as a foreign element. A positive mother's body does not fight the negative baby she is carrying however.

There are certain similairites that occur to those having rh negative blood - according to some who have it there are common patterns found, which include the following:

1. predominance of green or hazel eyes that change color like a chameleon, but also blue eyes

2. true red or reddish hair

3. low pulse rate

4. low blood pressure

5. keen sight or hearing

6. ESP

7. extra rib or vertabrae

8. UFO connections

9. love of space and science

10. a sense of not belonging to the human race

11. piercing eyes

12. para-normal occurrences

13. physic dreams

14. truth seekers

15. desire for higher wisdom 16. empathetic illnesses 17. deep compassion for fate of mankind

18. a sense of a 'mission' in life

19. physic abilities

20. unexplained scars on body

21. capability to disrupt electrical appliances

22. alien contacts

Written by Betty Matteson Rhodes: betmatrho@aol.com.

http://www.angelfire.com/pe/rcmatteson/redhair.html

Visit further Rh negative blood discussions: Israel & the Phoenix!

israel/jerusalem was home/created by vedic indians/brahmins etc.

[rasnalgoul]

you know, ive been reading all of this information, and it certainly is interesting. I thinks its also important to uncover this type of information and discuss it. But I also believe that we are all more than just are genetics. I dont think the idea that our genetics controls our abilities to do things or our personalities to a tee. It might play some part but I believe that consciousness overrides the DNA program. David has said in his books that the DNA is a program designed to make us carry out specific programmed responses. Through consciousness though we can rewrite or DNA and break down that barrier of physicallity. Well you all probably have read that anyway. Well I guess my point is that we shouldnt become to obsessed with DNA. But as I mentioned before it is also important to understand it and its origins. Thanks for the great info, I found it very interesting

[synergy777]

i think this stuff appeals to our narcasstic side, our arrogant side. chosen race etc. when i am obejctive, i don't really see the spiritual aspect, its more of a self comforting/assuring meme, religion. one can view this type of data, and skew the ananlysis in favour of our own egotistical needs, eg i am chosen, claridad, david shayler crap.

i think we obviously beings/creations, with huge potential, but if life itself can be broken down into electric/electomagnetic fields, hence the wave/particle duality debate, then lets be frank, is this really a setup, a test, program, simulation?

peopel will get upset, etc, but fuck them to be frank, we want facts not fans. the truth is science supersedes them, so they should get upset with scientists etc.

if today we had a new manhatten project, all the best in the fields of sciences/maths to break the code, simulation. before we had oppenheimer, von neumen, john nash, now its all black ops/oil etc.

modern society has hit a glass ceiling, we no longer care about the big questions, we only care the level of wealth/comfort, when if we breakdown the fabric of life, we could be gods/aware.

we are htting a new era, a dna/activation, a postion where if we utilise technology/supercomputers/nano tech, to really evolve, transhuman/cybernetics, implants.

doesn;t the maintsream view of life remind you of monochrome tv, when in reality it should be holographic. i like baudrillards view.

Jean Baudrillard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jean Baudrillard (July 29, 1929 – March 6, 2007) (IPA pronunciation: [ʒɑ̃ bo.dʀi.jaʀ][1]) was a French cultural theorist, philosopher, political commentator, and photographer. His work is frequently associated with postmodernism and post-structuralism.

From this starting point Baudrillard constructed broad theories of human society based upon this kind of self-referentiality. His pictures of society portray societies always searching for a sense of meaning -- or a 'total' understanding of the world -- that remains consistently elusive. In contrast to poststructuralists such as Foucault, for whom the search for knowledge always created a relationship of power and dominance, Baudrillard developed theories in which the excessive, fruitless search for total knowledge lead almost inevitability to a kind of delusion. In Baudrillard's view, the (human) subject may try to understand the (non-human) object, but because the object can only be understood according to what it signifies (and because the process of signification immediately involves a web of other signs from which it is distinguished) this never produces the desired results. The subject, rather, becomes seduced (in the original latin sense, seducere, to lead away) by the object. He therefore argued that, in the last analysis, a complete understanding of the minutiae of human life is impossible, and when people are seduced into thinking otherwise they become drawn toward a 'simulated' version of reality, or, to use one of his neologisms, a state of 'hyperreality.' This is not to say that the world becomes unreal, but rather that the the faster and more comprehensively societies begin to bring reality together into one supposedly coherent picure, the more insecure and unstable it looks and the more fearful societies become[7]. Reality, in this sense, 'dies out.'[8]

Accordingly, Baudrillard argued that in late Twentieth Century 'global' society the excess of signs and of meaning had caused a (quite paradoxical) effacement of reality. In this world neither liberal or Marxist utopias are any longer believed in. We live, he argued, not in a 'global village,' to use Marshall McLuhan's phrase, but rather in a world that is ever more easily petrified by even the smallest event. Because the 'global' world operates at the level of the exchange of signs and commodities, it becomes ever more blind to symbolic acts such as, for example, terrorism. In Baudrillard's work the symbolic realm (which he develops a perspective on through the anthropolical work of Marcel Mauss and Georges Bataille) is seen as quite distinct from that of signs and signification. Signs can be exchanged like commodities; symbols, on the other hand, operate quite differently: they are exchanged, like gifts, sometimes violently as a form of potlatch. Baudrillard, particularly in his later work, saw the 'global' society as without this 'symbolic' element, and therefore symbolically (if not militarily) defenceless against acts such as the Rushdie Fatwa[9] or, indeed, the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the United States and its military establishment (see below).



The object value system
In his early books, such as The System of Objects, For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, and The Consumer Society, Baudrillard's main focus is upon consumerism, and how different objects are consumed in different ways. At this time Baudrillard's political perspective was loosely associated with Marxism (and situationism), but in these books he differed from Marx in one significant way. For Baudrillard, it was consumption, rather than production which was the main drive in capitalist society.

Baudrillard came to this conclusion by critiquing Marx's concept of 'use value.' Baudrillard thought that both Marx's and Adam Smith's economic thought accepted the idea of genuine needs relating to genuine uses too easily and too simply. He argued, drawing from Georges Bataille, that needs are constructed, rather than innate. Whereas Marx believed that genuine uses lay beneath capitalism's 'commodity fetishism,' Baudrillard thought that all purchases, because they always signify something socially, have their fetishistic side. Objects always, he wrote, drawing from Roland Barthes, 'say something' about their users. And this was, for him, why consumption was and remains more important than production: because the 'ideological genesis of needs'[10] precedes the production of goods to meet those needs.

He wrote that there are four ways of an object obtaining value. The four value-making processes are as follows[11]:

The first is the functional value of an object; its instrumental purpose. A pen, for instance, writes; and a refrigerator cools. Marx's 'use-value' is very similar to this first type of value.

The second is the exchange value of an object; its economic value. One pen may be worth three pencils; and one refrigerator may be worth the salary earned by three months of work.

The third is the symbolic value of an object; a value that a subject assigns to an object in relation to another subject. A pen might symbolize a student's school graduation gift or a commencement speaker's gift; or a diamond may be a symbol of publicly declared marital love.

The last is the sign value of an object; its value within a system of objects. A particular pen may, whilst having no functional benefit, signify prestige relative to another pen; a diamond ring may have no function at all, but may confer particular social values, such as taste or class.

Baudrillard's earlier books were attempts to argue that the first two of these values are not simply associated, but are disrupted by the third and, particularly, the fourth. Later, Baudrillard rejected Marxism totally (The Mirror of Production and Symbolic Exchange and Death). But the focus on the difference between sign value (which relates to commodity exchange) and symbolic value (which relates to Maussian gift exchange) remained in his work up until his death. Indeed it came to play a more and more important role, particularly in his writings on world events.

[synergy777]

http://transcriptions.english.ucsb.edu/archive/courses/warner/english122tg/MartixBaudrillard.html

The Matrix and Jean Baudrillard's "Simulacra and Simulations"*

either way life is simulation. either an electromagnetic one or a lesser reality/maya, so when you come to this junction, what is the next step? science and religion ironically come to the same conclusion, that life is a real illusion!

[lostinstrangeworld]

Philip Schneider, the one who got killed after giving various lectures on UFO's, was rh negative.

I do have low blood pressure, keen sight/ hearing & quite a few of the others :D


One thing that can cause such mutations in the genes is that the genes do this to avoid a particular disease going around long ago. Like sickle cell.

And of course bloodlines have nothing to do with superiority when we are all equal......except for dolphins- they are better than man-unkind :D

[gold]

I believe they have a higher copper content in their blood, and when this oxidizes it turns a blue colour.....

I think you are right. I also read up somewhere, that this copper in the body acts as an insulator and conducts more electrical impulses to the DNA, enabling them to unlock and lock the DNA we call the Junk DNA. This gives them the abilities to shape shift and hold power over other beings and their minds. It may be just a coincidence, but-their is a shortage of copper in the world at the moment and the price of it has shot up! I think copper plays an important role in the lives if these Blue Bloded Reps somewhere along the line.
I also think it is the rh negitive blood they crave? I may be wrong!!!!!!!!
I havn't read other threads hear yet! I hope I havn't repeated........

[synergy777]

krishna, dravidian, are from africa. they painted krishna, buddha, these colours due to their dark skin/soul aura. its the same with yashuah, he was brown. this is why you can't accept them as brown but pontificate about equality.

[lostinstrangeworld]

krishna, dravidian, are from africa. they painted krishna, buddha, these colours due to their dark skin/soul aura. its the same with yashuah, he was brown. this is why you can't accept them as brown but pontificate about equality.

It is quite believable that they were from Africa; historical evidence proves that people were integrating with and trading with all kinds of cultures since the dawn of our Time. I strongly believe we are all one race and skin color is just an adaptation, a genetic mutation to cope with different environments.

White skin absorbs more vitamin D, this is why people evolved pale skin in places with limited sunlight, over the course of Time.

If people with racist attitudes could open their narrow minds to realize; they would see how completely and utterly ridiculous racism is.

Whether or not rh negative comes from a genetic mutation to protect against disease or somewhere else, I don't know, but many people carry the gene, even if they aren't rh negative themselves.

[synergy777]

the vitamin d angle is a very contemporary issue. this is why they add it to a lot of foods. people are not out enough in the sun, and if they stay in the sun, due to increased levels of uv/sun spot cycle, its a double whammey. you need vitamin d from the sun, but staying in the sun/uv causes skin cancer. then add in factor in the effect it has on folic acid levels, this later feeds into lower fertility, which is compounded by the chemicals eg teflon/processed foods, which is why the demographic time bomb, is trying to be averted by ivf/cloning etc. also further compounding this is the genetic diversity angle, downs/extra chromosone etc.

we are one race, genetics, dominant/recessive, dna tests show this. heck even olde european cultures like celtic/gaelic, latin/italian are practicaly similar to sanskrit/indian languages. if you look at newer cultures, its hard to tell. if you look at the difference in pre and post renaissance art depicting biblical stories, you will see that the renaissance was rebranding of world history, which is why the time before the renaissance is called the dark ages. they went from black yashuah and mariam, to white jesus and mary. the modern day white jesus is based on cesare borgia, the son of a pope.

they even started this whitewashing of history in the time of alexander the great, when he went to egypt, hew burnt the libraries of alexandria, he knocked off the noses of the pharoahs. when earlier greeks like socrates, hippocrates, herotodus has all said kemet/ethiopia/kush were the kings of egypt. also this is why romany are often called gypsies = out egypt. romanies are from northern panjab, who migrated into egypt/persia from india. they were know as hykos/persians/and jews, they founded jerusalem, read flavius josephus, a jewish historian. the biblical hebrews were african, the jews were vedic. jews is a religion, hebrews an ethnicity.

the first world culture was vedic one. and this was first created either in lermuria/atlantis. the first indians were african, we indians are adapted africans, the ancient kings of india were the naga kings, they brought the devenaghi script, which later evolved into sanskrit, which gave birth to latin. naga kings, the word naga has many forms, nagra/negro, it means black/dark. there is also the ancient legends of the naga kings and battles with serpent kings/fallen etc.

[synergy777]

lost check the krishna = jerusalem = hill of tara thread. or click onto the inneri sig, its a forum on the vedic history of the world.

[lostinstrangeworld]

Wow.

[2013]

The Hindu origins of the Olmecs

http://www.viewzone.com/gene.olmec.html

During the 17th century, the famous orientalist Edward Pococke noticed a disturbing similarity between classical Greek and Sanskrit. In his book, India in Greece, he showed that nearly all the place and tribal names of the Greeks had their similar correspondences in Northern India, especially in Afghanistan. The 18th century English scholar, William Jones, discovered the similarity of Sanskrit with many European languages, including Greek and Latin. Godfrey Higgins also supported their views in his two volume work, Anacalypsis. They and other distinguished linguists of the time concluded that non-Africanoid mankind probably originated in India, the Near East, and Siberia. These 17th and 18th century scholars were able to show that place, tribal, and religious names tended to stay the same, no matter how far certain ancient tribes dispersed themselves in different parts of the earth.

In the 1900s, Mexican scholars noted that the Nahuatl language is derived from Sanskrit. Even the word Nahua derives from the Sanskrit word for "sailor:" Nava or Navaja. Like their brother Allemans in Germany, the Olmecs could pronounce "V" only as "W."

Later on in the 20th century, in keeping with rising ethnocentrism in the world, many biased scholars tried to discredit the 17th and 18th century pioneers in linguistics, saying that words in one language, sounding alike and having similar meanings in other languages, did not prove that these languages were related. They created a pseudoscience called "Historical Linguistics."

For nearly all the last half of the 20th century, these historical linguists held sway over the minds of historians and archeologists, much to the delight of those "noble savages" wanting to think of their respective ethnicities and cultures as "original." Non-diffusionism was in. Diffusionism was out. Diffusionists were labeled as racially biased for wanting to discredit the "noble savages." But not all the "noble savages" sided with the non-diffusionists; they began to feel left out of the human race. Some began to ask, "Did I evolve from a species of ape completely different from the bonomo chimp from whom the rest of mankind descends?" The suspicion that they might somehow not have a common origin with other humans drove many of them to drink and perdition.

Thanks to the increasing cultural compression of the world, archeologists and linguists are concluding that men like Edward Pococke, William Jones, and Godfrey Higgins were right after all. The historical linguists and non-diffusionist archeologists are beginning to retire or change professions.:D

[2013]

http://www.viewzone.com/gene.olmec.html
The Olmecs - Proof of Diffusion?

A favorite superstition of non-diffusionists and historical linguists is the mystery of the origin of the Olmecs. They appear not to notice the nearly exact similarities between the ancient peoples of Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Kashmir, Rajasthan, etc., a part of India called Sivapuri, and the Meso-American Olmecs. I cannot understand or empathize with this type of non-awareness.

In ancient Northern India, a religio-political savant was known as Ma-gul, Mo-gul or Ul-mag, which meant "The Great God Ul." The syllables were interchangeable.

They were also called Eu-lama or Eu-rama (Aram), according to the different tribes' ability to pronounce "R" and "L." Eu = "Great." Rama/Lama = "Priest." Even today, among the Moslems, an Ulama or Ulema is a religious scholar and leader. There was even an ancient Near Eastern nation named Elam.

These distinguished priest scholars were additionally called Ul-man, Olman, or Ul-manu. meaning "Deified Sovereigns of the Earth."

When the non-Africanoid races of mankind left India for other parts of the world, the Ul-mags continued to call themselves Alleman (Germans), Aramean or Aramaic, and Olman, Ulmak or Olmek, in ancient Mexico. It is significant to note that the Phoenician sailor-traders had many names, one of which was Aram (Aramean). The Huichol Indians of Nayarit, Mexico call the port of San Blas Aramara, named after the India-Indian port they left on their voyage to America. Could this account for the name of the Nahuas?

The bible mentions that Solomon imported Almug trees from Sophir which was part of the northwestern coast of India: Sauvira. Scholars tell us that the Almug was really the Sandalwood tree. I'm not disputing that, but I am wondering why the Olmecs called the rubber tree Ulama(k). Just as the India-Indian Almug tree was held to be extremely sacred among the ancient Hindus, so also did the Olmecs revere the sacredness of the Ulama(k) tree.

A Sanskrit name for a particularly viscous sap is Urj. The Olmecs called the sap of their Ulama(k) tree Olli/Ulli. Olli was regarded as a sacred substance of life, like blood. Often, Olli sounded like Ollin because the Nahua-speaking people tended to nasalize the last syllable.

As I have stated, the Olmecs probably could pronounce "R" only as "L." The double "LL" in Spanish is regarded as a separate letter, sounding like Elye or Eljeh, according to the dialect being spoken. For instance, the Argentinians pronounce "Y" plus a vowel, as "J." For that reason, what the ancient Ul-mags or Mo-guls of Afghanistan called Urj, the Olmecs pronounced as Olji/Ulji.

Ulama - the ball game of life and death

The Olmecs played a type of sacred ball game, the name of which was the same as their sacred tree: Ulama. This holy ball game was played by all the Indians of the American Southwest, as far as the northern borders of South America itself.



For this and other reasons, I have long thought that the Olmecs were among the original settlers of the American Southwest, where they became known as the Hohokams and O'odhams, as I so state in my book, From Khyber (Kheeber) Pass to Gran Quivira (Kheevira), NM and Baboquivari, AZ -- When India Ruled the World!

Ulama was known as "The Game of Life and Death." It was played in ceremonies symbolizing the creation of the world and the struggle for supremacy between the forces of good and evil; day and night; life and death. The game was so sacred that losers were decapitated. The ruins one of the ancient Southwestern Hohokam ball courts can be seen at the archeological site near Casa Grande, Arizona. The Hohokam civilization, as well as its buildings, was truly splendid, with great mud-packed buildings several stories high, manmade lagoons, canals, and fields of corn, bean, squash, and chiles. However, its buildings long ago melted back into the earth; its lakes and canals became buried in desert sand. Archeologists in Arizona tell me that Hohokam ruins can be found throughout Southern Arizona, but they usually bury them again after they have been excavated and examined.

Noting that Ulama was not just an ordinary game, the Spaniards prohibited it after the Conquista. However, the Spanish fathers in Central and Northern Mexico, as well as those in Southwestern United States, allowed it to exist as a secular sport. Gradually, the game died in popularity, but it is still the favorite game of many Indians and mestizo villagers in Central and Northern Mexico. Tourists traveling in Mexico often see this game being played in villages near Mazatlan, such as Escuinapa. Ulama is presently increasing in popularity, promising to again become one of Mexico's favorite national sports.
:D

[2013]

http://www.viewzone.com/gene.olmec.html
More Evidence of Asian - American Contact:
Ancient Pyramids Discovered in Uzbekistan

A joint expedition of Russian and Uzbek archaeologists has discovered several ancient pyramids in Uzbekistan. According to the scientists, these 15-metre high constructions may be at least 2,700 years old. The ancient pyramids were discovered in a remote mountains area, in the Kashkadaryin and Samarkand regions in the south of the country, according to the BBC quoting from Pravda. Archaelogists state that the discovered pyramids are similar to the ones of Giza, Egypt, but in contrast to them, Uzbek pyramids have a flat surface, resembling those found in Central America. According to the experts, thanks to their remoteness, the pyramids were not taken to pieces to serve as building material in later epochs. According to archaeoligists, if the constructions are really pyramids, this is a very important discovery, since nothing of the kind has been found in this area before. Now, the task of the scientists is to establish a chronology and examine known local cultures, to ascertain the purpose of these constructions, tombs, temples, or something else. (Pravda, June 19, 2002.)



The Walls of ancient Khiva [pictured above], Uzbukistan, one of the oldest living cities on earth. Like the buildings of the Southwestern American Indians, Khiva's walls and buildings are made of packed mud and adobe, even having the appearance of some types of Southwestern Puebloan architecture.

I have much more evidence that the Olmecs were from Sivapuri. It would be good if the non-diffusionists and historical linguists could show me where I have gone wrong! :D

[synergy777]

2013, viewzone is awesome, also gerald massey, godfrey higgins, steven knapp are awesome writers, without them i would just had my hunches/observations, with them its added the academic accuracy. i think we know if we see without prejudice/programming, if we view objectivley and bias. without the propaganda/falsehood/illogical stuff they give to us truth/history in mainstream indoctrination, other wise know as education.

see if we are honest to ourselves/intellect and view things properly and not just take them as fact, if we question and not follow, we see the faults of mainstream history. its just people want conformity/acceptance, self assured/ego boosting, me, i am clever because i am good/mainstream. they don't question, out of insecurity/arrogance.

i mean as a kid, everyone knows the middle east is hot, has coloured folk, then why discount observation/logic and accept a blonde/blue eyed jesus, did palestine have skin bleaching/toni and guy? why do we accept falsehood, well its not falsehood if it exalts one is it? hence the reptile core/left brain clones/zombies we suffer. this is why any person who wants to be themself, anywhere in the world, is the outcaste, he/she is alive, awake, and the others hate them, for they wake them up from there slumber. this why the ability to understand, critically think, lateral/creative thinking, self expression is non existent in the modern education system. they teach you a curriculm/criteria, to pass an exam. not to understand, but to memorise and write, when exam time comes. you write down the criteria, you pass, understanding, questioning it, is irrelevant.

also back to topic, elam, i will dig some stuff up. i think it has to do with ham, a son of noah. the curse of ham, brown skin, another edit, to justify slavery, and the classification as coloureds as livestock, 3 fifths human, for tax/empire. its only since the late 60's this stuff has started to change.

[lostinstrangeworld]

People of all colours have been used for slavery, used for slavery by people of all colours.

It's just one of many examples of man's inhumanity to man, which we really need to go deep within to solve.

Some of the most despicable abominations by human beings are the way animals are treated. If there really is a Reptilian species who look at humans as humans look at cattle.......I cannot help but think, in a way, it is partly the humans fault for looking at cattle in such a way.

The collective consciousness of humanity has to change if things are to be put right.


Sorry I haven't looked at those links yet. I need more time. However, I read a lot about theories on rhesus neg. blood in my first pregnancy.

[gizmocrystal]

'Reptilian humanoids' might well exist and be evil as the research appears to conclude,

But we must ask ourselves-

Is the way human beings treat animals in animal testing laboratories, factory farms and slaughter houses, etc......

Any less worse than the Reptilian's treatment of humans?(!)


Wow i totally agree with you.

I always think about these things when contemplating the big questions.

Its good to find someone of the same thinking!!:D

[synergy777]

foodchain

[gizmocrystal]

People of all colours have been used for slavery, used for slavery by people of all colours.

It's just one of many examples of man's inhumanity to man, which we really need to go deep within to solve.

Some of the most despicable abominations by human beings are the way animals are treated. If there really is a Reptilian species who look at humans as humans look at cattle.......I cannot help but think, in a way, it is partly the humans fault for looking at cattle in such a way.

The collective consciousness of humanity has to change if things are to be put right.


Totally agree with this as well!

I am also very sensitive and empathic but sometimes have trouble with compassion (which i am trying to work on)

I am AB rh positive though so not the same as you!:D

[celtic isis]

Horshoe crabs have blue blood because of the copper. It's true, google it.
Archangel

hmm very interesting...there's a load of documentaries on the royal (british) family here cause of the anniversary of diana's ritual sacrafice etc and boy looking at the gene pool of those reps it doesn't get dluted that's for sure! urgh lol looking at the facial features of their grandpa and grandma kings and queens before the likes of charles etc, all the sme ugliness getting transferred to the next generation...bar sun king william and 'who's his real dad" harry, harry is quite the looker actually or is that just me thinking that :o

yeah i'd say they're blueblood all right, descendants from another race etc...have differnt DNA codes to us...however it doesn't reall change anything...they're still bastards at the end of the day, with the same ongoing agenda...rep or not! :D

[celtic isis]

Totally agree with this as well!

I am also very sensitive and empathic but sometimes have trouble with compassion (which i am trying to work on)

I am AB rh positive though so not the same as you!:D

i love you two gizmocyrstal and lostinastrangeworld! you poor pincushion!

i just was replying with a message like this and deleted it cause i thought i sounded stupid...but hey you rock! Therefore i rock too lol :o
i don't know what blood type i have, red lol that's all i know! I think AB something???

[lostinstrangeworld]

:)

Thanks. You two rock too. :D :p

I would be quite happy to meet up with you all in some astral bar on the astral plain any time......or in an astral garden if you like sipping tea :)

:D

I love deep conversations!