PDA

View Full Version : Mars Spirit Mission - Is It Real ?


chattanova
26-08-2007, 09:57 AM
from www.rense.com / http://www.rense.com/general78/rsm.htm

Selective dust and dirt accumulation on a Mars rover tell an intriguing story. Using relatively recent NASA images, at least one of the two rovers on Mars are not transmitting images from Mars. Whether or not this has always been happening remains to be seen. The following photographic evidence clearly shows SOMETHING very, very strange is happening on Mars. Dust devils which have been photographed (supposedly) on Mars are thought to be responsible for cleaning solar panels. However, it stretches credibility to think that these broad swirling vortices of air (Martian air that is) which are several meters across could perform the selective cleaning we see in these images.

http://img30.picoodle.com/img/img30/9/8/26/f_sol1Am_716c88b.jpg

FIG. 1 - SOL 1229 - White arrow: low gain antenna shaft on Spirit Rover
Red Arrow: Low gain antenna mounting plate - CLEAN of all dirt as well as most surrounding solar cells.
Blue circles: Surrounding dirty solar cells
Blue arrow: Dust and dirt finds its way into the smallest places, in this example its packed in-between solar cell wiring.


http://img02.picoodle.com/img/img02/9/8/26/f_sol1bm_9abff8b.jpg

FIG 2 - SOL1229 - Here is another amazing "selective cleaning" example. The white arrow points to a small area where something has apparently touched the panel, removing the thin layer of dust and exposing the metal underneath. Also visible is the hinge mechanism (red arrows) showing the hinge plates and actuator completely cleaned of dust. Also - there is evidence that the top hinge plate may have recently been attached to this dirty solar panel. Note the tool marks around the top edge of the hinge ears, and the disturbance of the dust around those ears. This is similar to the disturbed dust where the white arrow is.

The yellow arrow points to what may either be dust or rust on the drive shaft. Yet the solar cells are incredibly dirty?


http://img34.picoodle.com/img/img34/9/8/26/f_sol1cm_a830f50.jpg

FIG. 3 - SOL1229 - Not a speck of dust or dirt found in "nooks and crannies"

Here we clearly see that the dust has not entered an EXPOSED mechanism. Red arrows point to small areas where it would be sure to penetrate. Even on Earth, it would require the use of a brush or compressed air to remove dust from tiny crevices like these. Yet on Mars these tiny spaces are CLEAN? How?


http://img29.picoodle.com/img/img29/9/8/26/f_sol1dm_2fe84aa.jpg

FIG. 4 - SOL1220 - Dirty panel and clean mechanism side by side

If this wasn't documented as all ONE image from Mars, anyone would certainly have to think it is a collage of two images joined together. How could a "dust devil" which NASA has claimed to photograph on Mars so perfectly clean one panel and NOT the other?


http://img30.picoodle.com/img/img30/9/8/26/f_sol1em_2f35b3d.jpg

FIG. 5 - SOL1229 - Dirty Panels attached to a clean hinge

In this example, the red arrows point to two areas. The red arrow on the left points to the intricate wiring used to collect power from the solar panels. On the right, just inches away from the first red arrow another arrow points to a perfectly clean hinge pin, in pristine condition like the day it supposedly left Earth.


http://img03.picoodle.com/img/img03/9/8/26/f_sol1fm_31d5441.jpg

FIG. 6 - SOL1229 - Amazing sundial that cleans itself!

Here we see the sundial as mounted on the rover. Notice how the Sundial is surrounded by very dirty solar cells. Yet the Sundial is almost completely clean! How is this possible? The natural color of the top of the knob is black. The reference picture (insert) shows what the sundial looked like THREE YEARS AGO when the rover landed, under high and low sun conditions. This color image and the previous five images in this report are color-corrected. In most NASA color images the blue color reference tab on the sundial is actually PURPLE as NASA strived to make the colors on Mars match the mentality of Mars being a "red" planet.


What more can I say about this? The evidence is overwhelming for one of four possible arguments:

1.. ENTIRE MISSION WAS FAKED - None of the thousands of images for past three years were ever sent from Mars, and were all created on Earth in a studio. Such a studio with the right video editing would fool scientists - because they would see and believe what they want to see and believe.

2.. HYBRID REAL AND FAKE MISSION - Images were at first sent from Mars and later images were manufactured on Earth. This could explain why NASA falsified the color on so many images. When these false color images are corrected, we see the same color scheme as Earth - a blue sky and tan-colored desert.

3.. EXTENDED FAKE MISSION - Someone is selectively cleaning just enough of the solar panels to keep the rover batteries charged and functional. This would require a detailed knowledge of the interconnections between the panels to know which cells and panels to clean, and which ones are to be left dirty. In all solar panels, some cells are wired in parallel (to generate more current) and others are wired in series to generate higher voltages. It is well known that for any solar panel which consists of groups of solar-cells, covering up certain cells will result in no current or voltage generated.

4.. MISSION IS 100% REAL - Everything is real, the rover is on Mars and all is well. And none of this can be explained in any rational way.

kblood
26-08-2007, 10:22 AM
4. Unless aliens are living below the surface on Mars ;) And if that would be considered rational... I guess it is not considered rational :)

If our dinosaurs became reptilemen and "the greys" live on the dark side of the moon (or both sides?) then it seems quite likely that aliens or whatever they are to be called, have found a way to live on Mars as well.

If there are aliens though, it is very hard to tell since they would have to be something, that NASA or whoever does not want us to know of.

Interresting post :) I never knew that we actually had two rovers up there. Or should have had anyway... Im not much of a news person though. I mostly live quite secluded from the world of information, unless it is from the webpages I visit on the Internet.

chattanova
26-08-2007, 10:32 AM
4. Unless aliens are living below the surface on Mars ;) And if that would be considered rational... I guess it is not considered rational :)

If our dinosaurs became reptilemen and "the greys" live on the dark side of the moon (or both sides?) then it seems quite likely that aliens or whatever they are to be called, have found a way to live on Mars as well.

If there are aliens though, it is very hard to tell since they would have to be something, that NASA or whoever does not want us to know of.

Interresting post :) I never knew that we actually had two rovers up there. Or should have had anyway... Im not much of a news person though. I mostly live quite secluded from the world of information, unless it is from the webpages I visit on the Internet.

Hey kblood:) I like your theory there;) Didn't have a clue about the rovers myself.
There's much happening these days regarding Life/Mars (in the news), I think something's up:confused::rolleyes:

catfood
26-08-2007, 10:39 AM
The second picture down has got me thinking, there is no way that cud have happened on its own. It looks like sum one has touched it and forgot to put the fake dirt back on.

Not surprising that thay didn’t notice it you get so uset to leaving marks on things wile moving them about you wud forget there is no way the marks cud of got their iv it was really on mars.

The question is why are thay faking the mars landings? And dus this mean we have never been to the moon ether?

kblood
26-08-2007, 10:59 AM
The question is why are thay faking the mars landings? And dus this mean we have never been to the moon ether?

As you might know, there are alot of ways to disprove that USA ever landed on the moon with a manned shuttle. Why have it never been attempted since though? Is it that risky?

I am not sure wether there was a moonlanding, but it is not something I believe fully. It could very well have been one of the best cons of television and the cold war ;) If so, it surely was very well planned and played.

catfood
26-08-2007, 11:17 AM
What do you make of this picture of the moon landing?

If this was lit by the sun the shadows should all go the same way. But don't the yellow lines show that they are not!
http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/images/shadowphoto.jpg
The horizontal line in the background is just guesswork and wishful thinking. The lander's shadow could just as easily be being cast forwards at an angle in exactly the same way as the rocks in the foreground. We just can't tell for sure from this distance on a 2D image.

Got it from: www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/

This site trys to convins you thet the pictures are real, but I think the shadows in this picture make it look like a fake.

cruise4
26-08-2007, 01:20 PM
Why are we seeing these pictures? What I mean is do they rotate a camera to look at the rover itself routinely? Why would they do that if a fake mission? And then release the pictures knowing there could likely be such disrepencies. Is this a lander claimed to be on Mars?

Conjures up a nice image of some friendly alien out with his duster though:D

catfood
26-08-2007, 03:25 PM
Just been on: http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/home/index.html looking at the pictures the rovers send back and thay are all black and white.
Like this one.
http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/185/1P144605392EDN3400P2102L2M1-BR.JPG
So what’s with the colure pictures?
:confused::confused::confused:

hagbard_celine
27-08-2007, 04:51 PM
The second picture down has got me thinking, there is no way that cud have happened on its own. It looks like sum one has touched it and forgot to put the fake dirt back on.

Not surprising that thay didn’t notice it you get so uset to leaving marks on things wile moving them about you wud forget there is no way the marks cud of got their iv it was really on mars.

The question is why are thay faking the mars landings? And dus this mean we have never been to the moon ether?


Is there anything they couldn't fake? Is there anything they haven't?:eek: NASA has complete control of all the data they provide. the Skeptics can dress it up anyway they like; they can talk about Jodrell Banks and laser reflectors, but at the end of the day, if we're going to believe that they sent men to the moon then we're just going to have to take their word for it.

The presence of advanced or even intelligent life on Mars would be motive enough if you consider that the Brookings Report advised NASa rioght at the start of the space programme that if they found signs of life then it would be best not to shout it from the rooftops.

hagbard_celine
27-08-2007, 05:10 PM
Just been on: http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/home/index.html looking at the pictures the rovers send back and thay are all black and white.
Like this one.
http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/p/185/1P144605392EDN3400P2102L2M1-BR.JPG
So what’s with the colure pictures?
:confused::confused::confused:

Catfood, are you a newcomer to this forum? Maybe you haven't seen this thread; I think it will interest you:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3449