PDA

View Full Version : Anne Coulter fouls up, reveals her fear of NWO


cataleptik
24-08-2007, 09:16 AM
The Illuminati Agenda
Part 3
By Myron C. Fagan
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagenda3bestoverv iewyet8jun02.shtml
June 10, 2002
"Now my chief objective is to establish beyond even a remote doubt that communism, so-called, is an integral part of the Illuminati great conspiracy for the enslavement of the entire world. That communism, so-called, is merely their weapon and bogy man word to terrify the peoples of the whole world and that the conquest of Russia and the creation of communism was, in great part, organized by Schiff and the other international bankers right in our own city of New York.

"A fantastic story? Yes. Some might even refuse to believe it. Well; for the benefit of any doubting Thomas I will prove it by reminding that just a few years ago Charlie Knickerbocker , a Hearst newspaper columnist, published an interview with John Schiff, grandson of Jacob, in which young Schiff confirmed the entire story and named the figure old Jacob contributed, $20,000,000.

"If anybody still has even a remote doubt that the entire menace of communism was created by the masterminds of the great conspiracy right in our own city of New York; I will cite the following historical fact: All records show that when Lenin and Trotsky engineered the capture of Russia; they operated as heads of the Bolsheviks party. Now "Bolshevism" is a purely Russian word.

"The masterminds realized that "Bolshevism" could never be sold as an ideology to any but the Russian people. So in April 1918; Jacob Schiff dispatched Colonel House to Moscow with orders to Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin to change the name of their regime to the Communist Party and to adopt the Karl Marx "Manifesto" as the constitution of the Communist Party . Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin obeyed; and in that year of 1918 was when the Communist party and the menace of communism came into being. All this is confirmed in Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Fifth Edition.

"In short; communism was created by the capitalists."





thing is about Anne
she's SCARED. Nazis are counter intellectual, anti intellectual...
hmmm, need more words for "stupid", but they TERRORIZE people.
and of course they lie. Sometimes, people are so scared, they sort of 'disassociate'
- the storm of lies that comes from the stupid brains of nazis, especially Nazi Americans,
terrifies people into almost hiding inside themselves.

In this piece we see in a transcription of a Radio Broadcast,
that Ms. Coulter actually lets on that she knows all about the secret, Luciferous
One World Right Wing Secret Nazi/GOP conspiracy of Fabian Socialism and doublelthink that Myron Fagan alludes to and that it terrifies her.

If she was powerless, she would not have been able to say that little. It is like Aurelius said, the status of Nazi Grandson George Walker Bush still being in power has to do with good people doing almost nothing and simply looking away from him.

It's like the argument that 'if you don't vote you don't have a voice.' you have a voice when you tell them that you're not voting -- it is denial that fails to prove itself as anything more than denial.













On the Right--The sad fact of the matter is that the Right wing origin of the fraud perpetrated by illuminists is becoming impossible to conceal in this New age.

Zany Comedienne Anne Coulter left 'em laughing in an apprently impovised routine: stammering and ad-libbing her little heart out all for the NWO's long-running, award-winning SitCom: Shaft Everyone By Creating A World State!

let's tune in now...

----- Fabian Socialists: David Horowitz and Ann Coulter by TERRY HAYFIELD

There is a "Third Kind" living amongst us in this Republic. This "Third Kind" comes in a political package disguising themselves as Republicans, or World Conservatives of the International Democrat Union and Democrats, or World Liberals of The Third Way.

The "Third Kind" wants to establish a self-regulating classless society on planet earth. I have had radio encounters with two Republican members of the "Third Kind," Ann Coulter (author of the best seller Slander) and David Horowitz (author of Empire and Revolution and How to Beat the Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas).

People such as Coulter and Horowitz do not want to talk about the very real existence of the "Third Kind" nor do they want you to know what is really taking place in this Republic and the world.

The "Third Kind" is actually the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC). The Radical Capitalist Class is a group of people that are trying desperately to spread a very specific American/British Capitalism based on Fabian Socialism to encompass the globe. It is the belief of the RCC that this Capitalism if left unopposed will naturally evolve into a Socialism that will pave the way for Communism.

The RCC uses a continuous process known as Permanent Revolution (War, Revolution and Terrorism) to remove all impediments (national sovereignty) for the necessary establishment of Free Trade in order to create a global Free Market System (Economic Democracy), catalyst for Socialism.

The ideas of this "Third Kind" are alien to the American people. Here are a few facts to ponder:

In 1983, former Trilateral Commission (a Fabian Society Front group) members, George Bush Sr. and Margaret Thatcher, founded an organization called the International Democratic Union (IDU).

The IDU views itself as an organization of World Conservatives dedicated to establishing a Free Market System and a "compassionate conservatism." There are 70 member parties from around the world to include the Republican Party.

At the gatherings of the IDU the members set around and plot strategy "to win the political argument" and "planning winning election strategies" for World Conservatism.

Every four years the IDU holds a major meeting to coincide with the Republican National Convention in the same city, at the same time and with the Republican National Committee.

Recently (June 10, 2002) George W. Bush hosted an election strategy meeting of the IDU in the White House at which the President announced to the world of this nation's right to carry out pre-emptive military strikes (translated, raw aggression) against Terrorists wherever they may be. The IDU gave overwhelming support to this policy.

All these facts came from a 1979 Trilateral Commission membership list, the June 11, 2002 Toledo Blade, the May 8, 2002 Wall St. Journal and www.IDU.org.

Yet, when the current and leading political cheerleaders of the Republican Party, namely Coulter and Horowitz, were confronted with the IDU's existence, they chanted "conspiracy theory" and pleaded ignorance, despite saying more than they should have.

Now for the Radio Encounters of the Third Kind:

Anne Coulter , a bouncy and vivacious blonde, recently had been the darling on the major media talking head shows plugging her (at that time) recent best seller Slander in support of the Republican Party's election strategy.

Various talk show hosts have billed her as one of America's most intelligent women and an expert on the politics of the Republican Party.

Coulter's message is about how the terrible Liberal Democrats along with the Liberal biased Media slanders conservatives, especially conservatives of the Religious Right. Her biggest criticism of these "Socialist radicals" is the liberal accusing the conservative of 'not being cerebral.'

Ms. Coulter was interviewed on a July 19, 2002 Omaha, Nebraska AM radio talk show.

I had the opportunity to be a phone in guest. I wanted to know what kind of response Anne Coulter would give when confronted about the Republican Party's membership in the IDU. In the first part of the interview Anne bemoaned the fact that the Religious Right is slandered by the Liberal biased Media for belief in a higher being and tax cuts.

Coulter also observed when media consumers have a choice they overwhelmingly choose conservative talk shows. One thing she did not explain is why the Liberal biased Media networks had her on their Liberal biased programs to speak kindly of conservatives.

Before I got to ask my very specific question she made the claim the Liberal biased Media is 100% Socialist.

The question: "I am a patriotic conservative. I am so glad you stated there is a liberal control of the press. My research shows in some way this is a two way street. These same liberals since 1983 have not said a word about the Republican Party's membership of the International Democrat Union, that is promoting the same liberal agenda on a global basis and then passes it off as world conservatism. Can you enlighten me on that?"

The answer: No, (emitting an uneasy laugh) I think that is your field of expertise. I don't exactly know what you are talking about.

The next question: "That is exactly what I run into. The rank and file Republican does not know the Republican Party is a member of a global Socialist organization. You have demonstrated in the first half of your interview that you are against this stuff and Gee, shouldn't we know the Republican Party is promoting international Socialism?"

The answer: "I, I&I don't think so&actually&um. I mean I never understood the idea, um, um this, this um, secret organization theory, what are they doing behind our backs? They take half our money. When Clinton was president he was gunning down religious fringe groups, shipping little boys back to Cuba and I,&umm, ummm, (now with her voice raising) They take half our money, wetland designation tells us what we can not do with our land, what exactly do you think they are doing secretly, (voice really tense and still raising in tone) Good God Look what they are doing right in front of us!"

Next question: "That is the point I am driving at! You can ask any chairman of a state Republican Party about the Republican Party membership in an international socialist organization!"

Hurried response: "We're talking about something I...ummm...don't think exists. We've kind of gone off the road here...Can I have another call?"

It was more than obvious Anne Coulter did not want to discuss the IDU.

There are only two possible reasons for this. One of course is she really did not know about the IDU. If this is the case then it is a stretch of the imagination to consider Ms. Coulter an expert on Republican politics. The second reason is obviously she did know about the IDU and wasn't about to enter into a public discussion about the Republican Party's membership in an international Socialist organization.

The plot thickens!

A few weeks later David Horowitz was on the same radio station (August 6, 2002). Horowitz's interview was prefaced by one of the hosts describing how a previous interview was scheduled in advance but had to be cancelled at the last minute because Mr. Horowitz had been summoned to the George W. Bush Waco Texas ranch to talk election strategy. This was done to demonstrate the importance of his book How to Defeat the Democrats and Other Subversive Ideas. Would Mr. Horowitz s response be similar to Ms. Coulter's?

First question: Hello Mr. Horowitz, how are you?

Answer: Fine.

Second question: I was lucky enough to get an advanced uncorrected readers copy of How to Beat the Democrats. I do believe it is a book all Republicans should read. My question is: I understand the tactics you are trying to put across to the Republicans but, in lieu of the recent split between Al Gore and Joseph Lieberman, it seems there is a mad rush of Democrats going to the center, basically through the aegis of the Democratic Leadership Council which is also a member of an international organization called The Third Way. Consequently, at the same time I started reading articles a couple of months ago, one from the Wall Street Journal for May 8, something about an organization called the International Democrat Union made up of World Conservatives, then in the early part of June there was an IDU meeting at the White House that posed these World Conservatives were right of center.

Does the Republican membership of an international organization going to the right and vacating the center open the opportunity for the likes of Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton, rated by the DLC as a moderate to capture the political center?

Horowitz: Well look! You don't want to be fooled by rhetoric or labels. How solid is Joe Lieberman's conservative credentials, when it took him ten seconds to abandon all his principals to jump into the arms of Maxine Waters when he got that nomination."

[Author's note: Mr. Horowitz cautions about being fooled by labels and rhetoric, because I assume they are misleading. Notice he did not acknowledge the existence of the IDU.]

"The Democratic Party is pulled to the left by the unions, the racist NAACP leftists, and the teacher s union. All these people are hard left. It is a left wing party. It will remain left wing until it is beaten year after year."

[Author's note: Horowitz then continues by painting the Democratic Party with a list of labels using his best conservative rhetoric, as urged in his book How to Beat the Democrats. Now pay close attention to the following comparison. Horowitz is still using labels and conservative rhetoric, see page 67 of How to Beat the Democrats.]

"If you look at John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, you will not find one scintilla of difference between them. Kennedy was a hawk on defense. He was a militant anti-communist. He was for capital gains tax cut and a balanced budget. And that should tell you how far to the left American politics has slid in the last 40 years."

[Author's note: Yes, Horowitz is correct, don't get fooled by labels or rhetoric. The key phrase from the above quotation is "And that should tell you how far to the left American politics has slid to the left."

Consider that for a moment. Horowitz has hinted the Republican Party has moved to the left right along with the Democrats!]

Question: Do you have any comments on the International Democrat Union?

Horowitz: The Democrats would say"well I&you know. I don't know, I don't know what the International Democrat Union is . . . an international organization? The Third Way is a deception that we used to use when we were in the left to avoid the stigma of Communism without embracing the American way. And that to bear, Hillary Clinton is a Socialist. I don't care what they say in front of the cameras. They understand where the American people are and they are out to fool them. And Republicans have to be vicious in their attacks on the Democrats and strike first or be on the defensive.

[Author's note: Horowitz claims he doesn't know what the IDU is or even if it is an international organization. He then proceeds to use labels and conservative rhetoric to lead away from talking about the IDU. Please also note Horowitz does recognize the existence of the Third Way.]

Question: It seems the Republican Party, being a member of the International Democrat Union according to their web site, they are determining election policies in their respective member parties in their respective countries?

[Author's note: Pay close attention to the next response!]

Horowitz: Thats that's (raising his voice) way too conspiratorial. (his voice, still raising in intensity) Look! Just imagine Al Gore was president when 911 Happened! If George Bush was not in there we would not have declared war on the al-Qaeda! We would have not taken the Taliban down! And there would have been tens of thousands more Dead Americans! That's how I determine my politics! I don't determine them by getting on the internet and finding some international organization!

[The Permanent Revolution is a continuous process of War, Revolution and Terror.] If you notice from the above quote Horowitz determines his politics by waging war and predicting future terror. And still Horowitz will not acknowledge or even address the existence of the IDU. Instead he yells conspiracy!]

Statement: But I found this information in the newspapers and the Wall Street Journal!

Horowitz (now very agitated): The United States is part of the UN. It's a left wing organization. The US is in the UN, does that make the US left wing? The UN is always denouncing the United States, Britain and Israel. That's their business these days.

[Authors note: Just a few minutes ago Horowitz acknowledged a severe 40 year leftward drift in American politics.]

Question and statement (with a slight chuckle): OK, I'm glad you brought that up! If the UN is a left wing organization, then why is the Republican Party pushing International Free Trade, which is a left wing policy? (my voice rising trying to be heard over the loud protestations of Horowitz), I can even back that up with Hamilton s Essay #12 from The Federalist Papers.

Horowitz (successfully drowning out my efforts): Ah Look! I encounter people like you all the time. Politics is a complex business, OK? (speed of elocution picks up), You don't get to be morally pure on everything! Just because the US doesn't get out of the UN doesn't make it a left wing party.

[Author's note: I don't wear brown-shirt khakis and I definitely do not have pictures of Hitler on my walls. And don't forget Horowitz said there was no difference between Kennedy and Reagan. This is a good indication America just may be well left of the perceived American political center.]

Horowitz (quickly changing to an apologetic and condescending tone): I know I am on a religious station. Politics is the art of the possible, not the ideal! There is a big difference between politics and religion. Religion is about getting into heaven and if you mess with the Devil you're damned. In politics& politics is about getting into office! You make pacts with the devil all the time putting together a majority coalition to allow you to rule!

End of interview.

Horowitz, just like Anne Coulter, denied knowing of the International Democratic Union, but did not hesitate to label something he didn't know about a 'conspiracy theory'.

Again there are only two possible reasons for this. One is Horowitz didn't know of the IDU. But: how could a man, who had been summoned to George Bush's presence, to discuss electoral strategy (a man claiming to have authored the Republican manual for election strategy) have not known about the June 10th, 2002 White House hosting of an IDU election strategy session that was covered by the Associated Press?

Something is grossly wrong here. Which leads to the second reason. Horowitz does know about the IDU and does not want the rank and file Republican to know about it.

There may be a reason for Mr. Horowitz's ignorance of the IDU. Horowitz does know about the Permanent Revolution. This he cannot deny.

There is a section of How to Defeat the Democrats dedicated to The Unrepentant Left. In Chapter 4, on page 199, Horowitz vents his anger at a member of the radical left. It goes like this:

"Far from renouncing her communist and terrorist past, Boudin is part of the same radical network that fuels Linda Evans' seditious projects and remains an integeral part of the permanent revolution both signed onto in the 1960s."

The use of the term 'permanent revolution,' was not some idle choice of vitriolic rhetoric to demean the radical left. Horowitz knew exactly what he was writing. One only has to turn to his 1969 epic Empire and Revolution. A series of footnotes at the bottom of pages 28, 29 and 30 reveals the alter ego of Horowitz.

"Lenin referred to 'uninterrupted' or 'continuous' revolution rather than 'permanent revolution,' which had been revived as a term by Parvus and Trotsky." (p. 28.)

"The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly revolutionizing the instruments of production, and thereby the relations of production, and with them the whole relations of society." ( p.29.)

"Capitalist production according to Marx and Engels had centralized population and industry and concentrated property in a few hands. The 'necessary consequence' of this was political centralization.

Independent, or but loosely connected provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class-interest, one frontier and one customs-tariff." (p. 30.)

David Horowitz knows of the existence of the Permanent Revolution. Like any other conflict of man there are at least two sides in the struggle.

In the case of the Permanent Revolution the combatants have been Worker Socialists (The Third Way) and Corporate Socialists (today's International Democrat Union). In his youth Horowitz was very active and a leader of The Third Way. In his maturity Horowitz deserted his Worker Socialist brothers in Permanent Revolution and switched sides to the Corporate Socialist cause, now his new brothers in Permanent Revolution.

Like his days in The Third Way, to couch his communism and shun his allegiance to America, Horowitz now hides his communism behind a conservative cloak of new found Americanism in the form of World Conservatism.

But for some reason Horowitz, The Republican National Committee and the Republican Party do not want the rank and file members of the party to know the concept of compassionate conservatism comes from the International Democrat Union, just another Fabian Socialist front group helping to transform Capitalism into Communism.

Just a few last comments. Please consider all the things Horowitz did say. He compared the perceived conservative Ronald Reagan to a 1960s very liberal Democrat and graduate of the Fabian Socialist London School of Economics, John F. Kennedy. Horowitz acknowledged a severe leftward drift in American politics. And most damning of all, in order for the Republican "Third Kind" to rule (not get elected) they must consistently "make pacts with the Devil."

These "Third Kind" ideas are most definitely alien to Christian, Patriotic, Conservative Americans.

It is time for the people of this Republic to acknowledge the Republican Party is just another Communist front organization of the Permanent Revolution -- the dialectical evolution of Capitalism into Communism. =======


The Illuminati Agenda
Part 3
By Myron C. Fagan
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagenda3bestoverv iewyet8jun02.shtml
June 10, 2002
"Now my chief objective is to establish beyond even a remote doubt that communism, so-called, is an integral part of the Illuminati great conspiracy for the enslavement of the entire world. That communism, so-called, is merely their weapon and bogy man word to terrify the peoples of the whole world and that the conquest of Russia and the creation of communism was, in great part, organized by Schiff and the other international bankers right in our own city of New York.

"A fantastic story? Yes. Some might even refuse to believe it. Well; for the benefit of any doubting Thomas I will prove it by reminding that just a few years ago Charlie Knickerbocker , a Hearst newspaper columnist, published an interview with John Schiff, grandson of Jacob, in which young Schiff confirmed the entire story and named the figure old Jacob contributed, $20,000,000.

"If anybody still has even a remote doubt that the entire menace of communism was created by the masterminds of the great conspiracy right in our own city of New York; I will cite the following historical fact: All records show that when Lenin and Trotsky engineered the capture of Russia; they operated as heads of the Bolsheviks party. Now "Bolshevism" is a purely Russian word.

"The masterminds realized that "Bolshevism" could never be sold as an ideology to any but the Russian people. So in April 1918; Jacob Schiff dispatched Colonel House to Moscow with orders to Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin to change the name of their regime to the Communist Party and to adopt the Karl Marx "Manifesto" as the constitution of the Communist Party . Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin obeyed; and in that year of 1918 was when the Communist party and the menace of communism came into being. All this is confirmed in Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Fifth Edition.

"In short; communism was created by the capitalists."















--

anti-racist-action
fight fascism, racism, sexism and homophobia
http://www.antiracistaction.com/


--

anti-racist-action
fight fascism, racism, sexism and homophobia
http://www.antiracistaction.com/

--
http://old.punx.com/

qophee
27-08-2007, 02:12 AM
Maybe the bottom line is that we need a blend of socialism and capitolism. As for the u. s. federal government really being at the top of the food chain, I for one do not know that this is true.

I know one thing, the republicans can not undo what has been done with the federal register, aka N.A.R.A. because each little rule has to be voted by a majority to remove it. I think it was the equal rights amendment, which has never been ratified, that also changed how our government works. When the Judicial Branch was selected to be its overseer, the Judiciary was given more power. Hence all the bickering over selected associates to the Supreme court. Republicans didn't do this.

That is why democrats need to tax the hell out of us. The necessary bureaucracy to administrate our collossus federal register eats up money like a black hole. I bet a lot of it is also unnecessary. That is why my eyes bug out when I see groups of people getting together to have legislation create more laws. Try counting all the laws we already have in NARA. What the democrats did cannot be undone. It almost seems like this entire planet is going to be one big federal government. Remember the Volgons on "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy?"

And what is fascism anyway? I'm not going to look it up again, I will just try to describe it by memory; it is when government sort of cedes its will to corporate will, dems are going that way also. It is also extreme nationalism, well, I certainly can't accuse democrats of that.

That Watergate noise about the bugging of the national democrat campaign headquarters? That was probably being done by both sides for some time. It was punishment for Nixon revealing that two communist agents were on two white house administrations payroll. In 1995 this was verified when an old soviet cable was decrypted. Practically no one heard about it, the New York Times buried it.

Even that McCarthey witch hunt was created by the democrats who made McCarthy verify his claims of communist groups holing up in America as fifth columns. They knew it would be a big ugly mess. Now they can simply cry out McCarthyism! whenever the subject arises. Because of television and fifty thousand dead people voting in 1960 we got the Kennedy clan in our government. Makes me think of an Irish seven course meal; a six-pack and a potato. That stupid idiot messed up the Cuba issue and everything else he put his hands on. Even M.M.

So I don't want either, the republicans have to somehow operate with a dead horse government, and the democrats want to keep killing it some more. Well, I see 'made in China' on everything that is sold in stores nowadays, maybe we will get an entirely new government. Should I learn Mandarin or Cantonese?

soglad
27-08-2007, 02:14 AM
LOTS OF READING!!!

Summarize please! I'm lazy :p

cruise4
27-08-2007, 02:07 PM
"Maybe the bottom line is that we need a blend of socialism and capitalism"

Break out of this hegelian dialect thinking. When faced with a 'problem' you need to find the best 'solution'. There is no 'right wing' solution or 'left wing' solution. There is just the 'solution'.

The problem stems from representation. ALL branches of society need to be represented in any decision making process.

You might think one man one vote does it, but there's too many who are unqualified to give a sensible answer.

So we need a broad based Meritocracy. Representatives are elected from within professional activity groups, hence the merit aspect, and also from every group present of note within a society, so broad based. Term level would be kept shorter rather than longer.

Perverted control becomes extremely difficult under such an arrangement and solutions to problems would be based on real world needs and altruistic ambition, not abstracts.

Professional Politician is a term that needs consigning to history.

qophee
28-08-2007, 12:43 AM
"Maybe the bottom line is that we need a blend of socialism and capitalism"

Break out of this hegelian dialect thinking. When faced with a 'problem' you need to find the best 'solution'. There is no 'right wing' solution or 'left wing' solution. There is just the 'solution'.

The problem stems from representation. ALL branches of society need to be represented in any decision making process.

You might think one man one vote does it, but there's too many who are unqualified to give a sensible answer.

So we need a broad based Meritocracy. Representatives are elected from within professional activity groups, hence the merit aspect, and also from every group present of note within a society, so broad based. Term level would be kept shorter rather than longer.

Perverted control becomes extremely difficult under such an arrangement and solutions to problems would be based on real world needs and altruistic ambition, not abstracts.

Professional Politician is a term that needs consigning to history.
-------------------------------
A broad based Meritocracy? Someone who didn't spend a few million dollars for college. I like that idea. Exclude anyone who holds Auguste Comte in the same high esteem that Aristotle and Einstein receive. They must also have some degree of Initiation in Wisdom religions. Hindu, Buddhism, ancient Egyptian, Gnosis, Sufism, Theosophy in general. All religions deserve high regard. Yet, somehow be secular. Is that a bearable paradox?

I just throw things out there, don't I? I sure liked your post cruise4. It was greatly appreciated to hear from someone with a good head on his shoulders.

cataleptik
24-10-2007, 06:57 PM
LOTS OF READING!!!

Summarize please! I'm lazy :p


i was gonna, but then i thought about it and realised -- what would be the point?

then i think to a group i just quit, a research forum.
i refrained from getting mad and just left. some people want to compile
bits of discrete data forever and a day -- some people want to do something. and some people want to scream "bullsh*t" whenever anyone gets at anything valid.

there's things that have to happen -- as in - people who really want to dislodge those who would rule us via deception forever must expand their ability to learn. i mean, lazy, lazy is a virtue when those who do as they do seek to enslave us. but how can i learn for you?


-
it's just complicated.
they have been creating via deception a false history for CENTURIES -- and reinforcing that via the lies that they tell - and the unconscious lies that those they have decieved tell.

--

another example is the bad XMEN films they i hope are done making.
they think their genre is superior -- and yet they cater banally to a nerd marketplace. they shame great cinema and at the same time try to condense 30 years of writers' character development into seven-odd hours of sci-fi-channel caliber film. it's -- if people don't think for themselves, the result is the negligence we see all around us.

anne coulter was funny though. i've learned to skim.

cataleptik
13-11-2007, 03:24 PM
con. rep standing for, of course, constitutional republic.

what else could it stand for. (reptilian conspiracy? we must work our way to the absurd and mysterious from the concrete and day to day. but con. rep...heh heh heh. anyway i will stop laughing at my own weak joke now.)


to reiterate: condensing is sort of futile. i mean, these concepts that we deal with require comprehension. a hunger for soundbites is a great part of why those who rule and dominate us are skilled at decepion -- when people beg for diluted versions of what to complain about, how can they get the full story? i could encapsulate it "Nixon was just not the BIGGEST crook." but what does that really say? if there's other stuff that's important to you, hurry and go skim.

the main questions are: have Democratic and Republican notions been set up to create an imbalance that serves republican interests since the time of the American revolution -- and even centuries before in the time of Pericles and Aurelius?
Is it actually necessary, while Musharraf is claiming that Democracy must be sacrificed in favor of country -
to seriously overhaul the American federal government and constitution to create a stronger, more durable and sustainable United States of America?

that's the thesis for the rather long essay that follows, meant to be politically intensive with a light touch of humour -- to make a distinction from the Stephen Colbert sort of political surrealism and absurdism now popular. So delete it if you don't want to read it. It's long.
However if anyone does read it, the author would appreciate any and all feedback and correction.
and also it is dedicated to the striking Hollywood writers. Keep striking. Teevee SUX.

i have actually lengthened it. The purpose of such is simple: it is more fun to discuss these otherwise tedious issues
with people who care enough to take the time to educate themselves. That's pretty much it -- to me, those who seek
the extinction of human compassion -- or "the death of care" are in fact DESTINED to be put in their place, deposed, in their arrogance
by people who care a great deal and research the facts. Hence, skim if you like, but what I have done here already represents a significant condensation, considering the centuries that these "Illuminists" have ruled. Do what you will.


Interview With a Self-Described "Doltish Buffoon"

INTERVIEWER:


We are interviewing today with – excuse me, young man, what’s your name?
YOUNG MAN.

Mee Emm Dum

INTERVIEWER:

ah, yes, this is young mister ‘Mee Emm Dumm” and, well we’re here interviewing him today because he is a self styled doltish buffoon…a moron, a complete idiot…or so is his claim. Is that so, Mister Dumb?
Young man:
that’s right mee am dumb, stupid. I don’t get…whaddya got? I can be a dolt about almost anything.


Interviewer:

such as?
Young man:

well, uh…tommy said they were all dumb too.
Interviewer:
why you poor man…you poor oafish, stupid little man. You look ashamed! Tell us all who this ‘tommy’ is who said they were all dumb.


Young man;
Tommy. Thomas. Thomas Hooker. He said they were all dummies.



Interviewer.

They? Who was the they?

Young man: duh...duh vo-terz. Dumb dumb dummies.
(plays with toes: he’s a total moron. He’s wearing a filthy blanket around his lower parts as a diaper…it’s pathetic.

Interviewer:

you mean Thomas Hooker?
Democracy essay


'Nor is possible that any form of polity, much less polity ecclesiastical, should be good, unless God himself be author of it."
Thomas Hooker





Democracy is unusual. First the capitalists after years of subtle and overt efforts, perfected their world state, The Constitutional Republic: The world social police state: the "Corpocracy".
Then the capitalists lied to protect the things and people they had stolen.

The capitalists lied and lied about the fact that they had lied. They followed the advice Plato, philosopher of Antiquity, and called their Constitutional Republic "Democracy" whenever they could, to strengthen the public's belief in a lie.

It’s like: if you got a purple car that was a reddish purple and sold it to an old man who was nearsighted and said “enjoy your new Green Car!’ after a few times of telling the old man it’s a red car he will show it off to who? Others who won’t tell him it isn't actually Green.

He’s an old man. Let him enjoy his delusion.

(Philosophical vehicles)And so the deep royal purple car of Constitutional Republic and centuries of Platonic non divergence from plan was sold to Americans beginning with the founding of the Constitutional Republic as the shiny, fast, low drag-coefficient "Green" Car of Democracy.


It plodded forward and people complained over and over about the unresponsiveness of government, the slow turning of the wheels of legislation. People got used to complaining and not getting satisfaction.

Plato’s weird science of Republic never had any intention to give the people rule over their interest – what Democracy would have entaile d—but should they be TOLD it was Democracy and believe the lie – how much better for the eventual rise to power of plato’s Republic as a perceived indespensible part of world government1

there is the whole of rumors of so called ‘Long term conspiracy’ – it’s just Plato governing the world Constitutional Republcs because they are screaming for Democracy but of course as animals they couldn’t be allowed to lead themselves!


Such was the attitude Plato filled people’s heads with before he went to the grave and became the ruler of countless republics to rise up in the centuries after his passing, one of those republics being notably the nation that was called The United States of America…

The capitalists contrived morose excuses and vast deceptions. they lied, and then boldly said "our ways are righteous. we NEVER lie."

they bought and sold human lives; they seduced and deluded as many people as they could…but there were many small awakenings.

EVERYONE who woke up was called a liar by capitalism, capitalism that reduced people to low common denominators and vaunted selfishness and cruelty as virtues. capitalism turned people into liars with lies: its tool was the lie and one of its most overt lies was that there was nothing better. if you make the mistake of assuming that anyone against capitalism is for the barbaric socialism of cunning liars like Chavez or Stalin, you are being trapped as those who have ruled for centuries fully expected to trap you. And do expect to trap us all, forever and indefinitely.


The lie repeated over and over and over again over the course of generations and centuries -- as in the rise of teh false United States Democracy --

one lie was that capitalism was not a tool of government, but an economic philosophy. it was both. those who knew it was a tool of domination and rule spread the lie that it was only prudent economic philosophy

those who had accepted it as truth lied and said it was the best way.

But there was a better way that began to rise in the late 1980s in a wave of sudden human outrage: that way was called democracy. People the world over had an intuitive sense that something called democracy could lead them to freedom: the capitalists postured and decieved and it took quite a while for the people to gain the skill to see through and push back these deep complicated lies and the liars who told them.



Domination and enslavement of the woman was their key to attainment of tyranny; they used this to seduce women into accepting base, empty desires that could only burn them out or lead them into a plummeting spiral of decay and self abasement.

At first the women who WOKE UP to the lie of what capitalism offered were ridiculed: inevitably they began to band together with their sisters who were seeing through the desperate ruses --

(the ruses were desperate because human evolution was the doom of capitalism: it was a wave that could not be stopped and so the capitalists did their low worst to attempt to stem the tide of evolution; by encouraging human beings to band together based on their differences and to obscure the samenesses that made all of humanity one. it was the same divide and conquer tactic that the capitalists had used for generations to make people fight subtle and overt wars against each other, woman against man, jew against gentile just to name a few of the concepts of division the capitalists had used to convince people that hate and prejudice were more vital and realistic than love and acceptance.)

the desperate ruses of the forces of separation and hatred began to degrade as humans continued to evolve and realise that they were one: and their best bet for continued improvment of quality of life was to come together in the spirit of love and sharing resources: the capitalists panicked and did what capitalists always did -- they lied and used their lies to create wars: they lied and fomented hatred.

capitalists of the flesh and the spirit who gained feelings of smirking superiority by subjugating people's wills to the pursuit of greedy ends. they created wars by summoning up ancient racial hatreds and saying "these reasons for hatred are eternal and will never end." but they were lying: and after a certain point it became obvious.

still there were steps forward, steps back. In Tienanmen Square at the close of the 1980s people were outraged and screamed, demanding what they thought was "democracy". But they got the same form of Constitutional Republic system that had dominated the American Continent, noth and south, as well as many other nation states all over the globe.

The capitalists lied and attempted to create a bogey - man in socialism.

The Illuminati Agenda
Part 3
By Myron C. Fagan
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illu...enda3bestoverv (http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/illuminatiagenda3bestoverv) iewyet8jun02.shtml
June 10, 2002
"Now my chief objective is to establish beyond even a remote doubt that communism, so-called, is an integral part of the Illuminati great conspiracy for the enslavement of the entire world. That communism, so-called, is merely their weapon and bogy man word to terrify the peoples of the whole world and that the conquest of Russia and the creation of communism was, in great part, organized by Schiff and the other international bankers right in our own city of New York.

"A fantastic story? Yes. Some might even refuse to believe it. Well; for the benefit of any doubting Thomas I will prove it by reminding that just a few years ago Charlie Knickerbocker , a Hearst newspaper columnist, published an interview with John Schiff, grandson of Jacob, in which young Schiff confirmed the entire story and named the figure old Jacob contributed, $20,000,000.

"If anybody still has even a remote doubt that the entire menace of communism was created by the masterminds of the great conspiracy right in our own city of New York; I will cite the following historical fact: All records show that when Lenin and Trotsky engineered the capture of Russia; they operated as heads of the Bolsheviks party. Now "Bolshevism" is a purely Russian word.

dispatched Colonel "The masterminds realized that "Bolshevism" could never be sold as an ideology to any but the Russian people. So in April 1918; Jacob SchiffHouse to Moscow with orders to Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin to change the name of their regime to the Communist Party and to adopt the Karl Marx "Manifesto" as the constitution of the Communist Party . Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin obeyed; and in that year of 1918 was when the Communist party and the menace of communism came into being. All this is confirmed in Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Fifth Edition.

"In short; communism was created by the capitalists."

the capitalists kept the majority of people busy doing mind numbing slave labor for subsistence wages, and calling it "work" -- it was slavery for a unit of currency that had a relative value easily manipulated by the dodgiest and most cruel of economic sadists behind closed doors.

using people 's cultivated ignorance they claimed in the 1980s that socialism was a monster that the greatness of capitalism and its proud military - industrial complex had defeated. they were lying: and socialism was beneath its core of rhetoric exactly identical to capitalism: it was a system for continued policing aggression and enslavement of millions: using their energy to fund and galvanize a military policing system that covered most of the world and had its sights set on space.


Democracy is not Constitutional Republic. and perhaps the most basic fact that creates the difference between the people's will creating adminstration of resources -- democracy -- and the small group of individuals deciding the fates of millions upon millions -- socialism and Constitutional Republic -- is the fact that in democracy the people are equals: none any more right to "rule" or "lead" than any other.

But the masses had been deceived by smiling bastards who had secretly made deals with some of the worst criminals of the 20th century and covered it up deftly.

i remind you once again that the role of the capitalists, more often than not, was to lie, and smile, and present themselves as heroes of the world.

mass murder was time and again presented as necessary war after back room agendas and conspiracies that hid behind 'plausible deniability" did their trick of deceiving millions with propaganda. And all the time there was, in the American States, the Constitutional Republic presenting itself as Democracy -- and the American polity, the people, too duped by rhetoric or frightened by the shadowy Secret Police, the American KGB, to protest and make effective changes. For many years things remained at this stalled impasse.

Those who did protest were often deeply blinded by rage, so much so that decade after decade they resorted to the same old methods of protesting--marching and screaming at "politicians" who turned deaf ears, more determined to serve their own agendas and the established rule of law than the will of the people. This was evidenced in 2003 when millions of people and in fact billions worldwide turned out to reject the belligerent agenda of the GOP-led United States fighting forces.

cataleptik
13-11-2007, 03:42 PM
In a Democratic state, a TRUE Democratic state, there would have been applied the tool of referendum to gauge the public opinion and serve the will of the people.

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) (http://dictionary.reference.com/help/luna.html) - Cite This Source (http://dictionary.reference.com/cite.html?qh=referendum&ia=luna) - Share This (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?db=dictionary&q=referendum#sharethis) ref·er·en·dum http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/premium.gif http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pnghttp://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif (https://secure.reference.com/premium/login.html?rd=2&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.reference.com%2Fbrowse%2 Freferendum) /ˌrɛfhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngəˈrɛnhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngdəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ref-uh-ren-duhhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun, plural -dums, -da http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/premium.gif http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pnghttp://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif (https://secure.reference.com/premium/login.html?rd=2&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.reference.com%2Fbrowse%2 Freferendum) /-də/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[-duh] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation. 1.the principle or practice of referring measures proposed or passed by a legislative body to the vote of the electorate for approval or rejection. Compare initiative (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=initiative) (def. 4a). 2.a measure thus referred. 3.a vote on such a measure.
[Origin: 1840–50; < L: thing to be referred (neut. ger. of referre to bring back; see refer (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=refer))http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png]


Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.

Instead the GOP led Government went forward with a war agenda some say was decided on months or years before the World Trade Center was destroyed.

There was no referendum: yet in speech after speech the Congresspersons and Senators of the United States of America went before their constituencies and spoke of "defending Democracy." The basic thesis is simple: a false idea of what Democracy actually means has been conditioned, hypnotized, programmed and reprogrammed and sold to people -- and necessary to that deception was massive misunderstanding and confusion about the differences between Capitalism and Socialism, which are closer to nil than most people who believe what they have heard on the news since Walter Cronkite was a much younger man -- since the war against Hitler -- would readily accept. (Robert Anton Wilson may have called this "Operation Mindfuck", or he may have been talking about something else. Entirely sinister!)

For all those who had opposed war and who worked and spent money contributing to the American tax base: it was taxation without due representation: their rights and desires were completely steamrolled.

It was close to democracy, but different enough so that those who sought to ignore the will of the people could do so while people screamed and complained and wondered where the democracy had gone.

Many felt sickened by the fact that their tax dollars went to pay for the slaying of women and children, It could have been different and this is what led to the people's gradually beginning to transform the United States Government into an actual working democracy: taking power out of the hands of military string men and dictators and their lackeys and putting it into the hands of those who would do the actual will of the people responsibly: creating true Democracy.

It's Sage Advice: In true democracy the masses are not dominated by benevolent dictators who do what they will regardless of the well being of the people.


When in Pakistan, a basic regional Rajah claims that Democracy must be sacrificed to save the country -- what that rajah seeks to preserve is their own status as ruler, not the people or the state -- but the rule that is enforced by himself, and whoever shares his worldview. In exactly the same way constitutional republican leaders in the west have power of political control. It is by way of deception and all the wars in the world won't stop a war machine. People must do what Plato feared most and learn to know what Republican philosophy ACTUALLY IS -- rather than accepting the version of Republic that those who have attained rule by using it have done.
If you look up almost any definition of Republic and Democracy today, your chances are good of finding a definition written by "champions" of Republic who wish for people to seek dominators, dictators, kings rather than government truly of, by and for the people.

Creating systems of, by and for oligarchs and "bloodliners" while lying to the people -- that's what The 500 has taught me.

cataleptik
13-11-2007, 03:47 PM
People who didn't grow up in America: i wonder if they, too were forced as children to pledge obeisance and right of rulership to Republic, years before taught who Plato was, what his opinion of young boys, younger than the age of consent or citizenship was (he loved them. Really, really, like Kinko, the Kid-Lovin' Klown, Plato LOVED young boys. the fact that the role of pedophilia in the classical Greece of Plato and Aristotle is little known must change -- people must understand the ancient role of that particular perversion and denial of individual autonomy in the conditioning of Platonic thought over the centuries - and it is the nature of the best that such deep thought and questioning of authoritative thought forms is not popular in America.

True democracy has been BLOCKED in its creation by the champions of dictatorship, including the framers of the American Constituton: misogynsists and slavedrivers. True Democracy is already being created by people --Many view True Democracy as an inexorable force in the evolution of human society, politics and nations.


It can not be created by those thirsty for blood and vengance, those who wish to revolt violently are never interested in the tender compassion that must accompany real democracy:

the compassion of people who -- at least in American life, would rather seek ways to deal with their domestic problems than creating a military state that seeks to spread its tendencies all over the world.

It is a sprawling issue! In any country that calls it self "The Republic Of" -- most times they will say that their government is a democracy and that they are proud of it. Just having elections for representatives does not make democracy. Referendum is a tool of vital, living democratic society as well --

in a democracy, the people's opinions and desires as polled by ballot determine national domestic and foreign policy. If that looks unlike what what people have in the United States, then surprise! and Congratulations! You have discovered a ruse more than two hundred centuries old.

Democracy is truly sane.








????????????????????????? ?????
interviewer:

so you are really stupid then, eh?
Young man:
yep! Me am big dumb. (ceases toe sucking for a moment) but I read a lot.