Incredible footage of ufo from nasa

[clint_giles]

HERE IS 2 PIECES OF FILM OF DEFINATELY THE SAME SHIP

first from nasa

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPZJ4dH0qlk

then from paris
I especially love how the sky looks after it takes of
definately not cgi
i dont care what anyonme says,you cannot cgi the sky

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FE2s7tySlM


THESE 2 PIECES OF FILM SHOW THE SAME CRAFT ,IMO

ALSO THIS PIECE.
http://ufo.whipnet.org/digital.proof/space.shuttle.snowflake.ufos/index.html

[skunksmash]

well...i'd like to believe they're real, b/c if it is, its the BEST UFO footage ive ever seen. ;)

but the possibility of photoshop is greatly heightened b/c the ship does not appear solid, it looks like light..... & this is very easily faked.

[keystone]

THESE 2 PIECES OF FILM SHOW THE SAME CRAFT ,IMOHow so?

Cheers

[george tatum]

I don't want to be a party pooper but the second clip is almost certainly a fake. I don't know whether I'm older than a lot of posters on these forums, but a lot of UFO video footage resembles the sci-fi movies of the era from which such footage emerged.

The second clip is pure X-files and far too smooth. It is also incredibly recognisable and iconic. I find it interesting that we never had clarity or photographs like that in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s.Even in the absence of digital photography it would be possible to capture such phenomena). One has to conceed that the saucer in question is just too 'showbiz'. It looks great and the video is cool, but it's just too obvious - the way it flies behind a pillar to create distance, the 'zoom' into the clouds, the perfect timing - the piece has even been framed and there is no indication of the filmmaker rushing to grab a camera - no shaking or wobble. It's all too perfect to be convincing.

I hate writing that because I saw a UFO once, but this image is way too media savvy. I fear it is someone trying to get hits on youtube.

[hitithard]

hi,
thanks for sharing. My first impressions about the videos, was that the first one, could be real or fake....its a v.cool video if it is genuine, who knows. but i had a much stronger feeling that the second one was fake. The back ground looks too much like a photo, and then the craft imposed over the top. And the flashes at the end...erghm, fake imn my opinion!

[merlincove]

Hi :D

i'd say the first one was lense flare / light refraction, it doesn't look like anything is there, and looks more like a reflection.

The second, i don't know, but it seems very out of sorts to me. The last flash in the clouds also looked fake.

[eternalwheel]

Hi :D

i'd say the first one was lense flare / light refraction, it doesn't look like anything is there, and looks more like a reflection.

The second, i don't know, but it seems very out of sorts to me. The last flash in the clouds also looked fake.

Yeah that second one looked like the Star Trek enterprise/voyager warp drive at the end. Would love it to be real but I would say it's fake unfortunately.

[clint_giles]

How so?

Cheers

the triangular shape of course.

[clint_giles]

I don't want to be a party pooper but the second clip is almost certainly a fake. I don't know whether I'm older than a lot of posters on these forums, but a lot of UFO video footage resembles the sci-fi movies of the era from which such footage emerged.

The second clip is pure X-files and far too smooth. It is also incredibly recognisable and iconic. I find it interesting that we never had clarity or photographs like that in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s.Even in the absence of digital photography it would be possible to capture such phenomena). One has to conceed that the saucer in question is just too 'showbiz'. It looks great and the video is cool, but it's just too obvious - the way it flies behind a pillar to create distance, the 'zoom' into the clouds, the perfect timing - the piece has even been framed and there is no indication of the filmmaker rushing to grab a camera - no shaking or wobble. It's all too perfect to be convincing.

I hate writing that because I saw a UFO once, but this image is way too media savvy. I fear it is someone trying to get hits on youtube.

your obviously a ufo expert
what book have you written?
i would like to read some of your research

also i was wondering how you explain the clouds being lite up like they were.

[clint web]

your obviously a ufo expert
what book have you written?
i would like to read some of your research

also i was wondering how you explain the clouds being lite up like they were.

Why are you getting so defensive with the poster? I'd like to read your book!

Lots can be done with CGI - After Effects is great even for semi amateurs:

http://www.videocopilot.net/tutorials/

The guy who does tutoial on that site could certainly do it and thousands of others too.

[mind1universe]

NASA are there to spoof UFOs. So they are deliberatlely made look fake. So we will be more skeptical about these videos in future. So when you see a real UFO you will autmatically think It's a fake.


You should really cop on to this already. If NASA show a UFO video they are doing it for dis info. NASA are the ones to always debunk and ridicule these events. So when NASA expose this video you should seriously wake the fuck up to the obvious shit stirring here.

It gets so tireing to see how people fall for it every fucking time.

[richardhastings]

if this is real or not , it' just goes to show all of us how quick they would move , thanks for the clip ,
thanks for sharing with all of us

richard:)