PDA

View Full Version : United 93 shot down


freeze
22-08-2007, 11:08 PM
Back on Sept 12 2001 while I was sitting around watching CNN with my parents wondering if our flight to Vegas was going to happen on Sept 13. We were watching CNN or something similiar ... they mentioning the United 93 crash debris and how difficult it was to retrieve the wreckage. It was mentioned that the debris was scattered over 5 miles..... I am no rocket scientist but I assume that when a plane crashes parts of it dont hit the ground then go flying through the air for 5 miles. Well that day I came to the conclusion that it was indeed shot down. This expains the drawn out crash debris from the midair impact.
Strange how soon afterwards they made the passengers to be heros who forced the plane to crash after struggling with the hijackers. In my opinion the government didnt want the public to know that they had shot down the plane given the circumstances surrounding the supposed phone calls that passengers were trying to take back control of the plane.
Funny thing is I never heard another mention of the fact of the 5 mile crash site for United 93 .... strange but true.

irie_dave
27-08-2007, 04:55 PM
How wide was the crash site really b/c in that History Channel hit piece Alex Jones said it was 4 miles but then the Popular Mechanics guys tried to say it was only 1 1/2 & that the larger figures were based off of how far it is by road or something. I haven't looked into this aspect of 9/11 as much.

irie_dave
27-08-2007, 04:56 PM
I know one thing, the corroner did make the statement I stopped being a corroner after a while because there were no bodies regardless of how he tries to spin that statement now.

freeze
29-08-2007, 06:06 AM
How wide was the crash site really b/c in that History Channel hit piece Alex Jones said it was 4 miles but then the Popular Mechanics guys tried to say it was only 1 1/2 & that the larger figures were based off of how far it is by road or something. I haven't looked into this aspect of 9/11 as much.

All I recall was that they had said it was 5 miles when it was first reported back on Sept 12 2001 .... then never heard another thing about it since. I never did see Alex Jones and his piece on that plane....

graflok
29-08-2007, 08:24 AM
Rumsfeld said publicly and on camera that Flight 93 was shot down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFuUGEZ39g8

geewhizz
29-08-2007, 09:49 AM
Hi

Flight 93 WAS shot down by USAF according to Channel 4 news. How do I know this?..

I was wtching the channel live at the time. An hour later the story changed.

kblood
29-08-2007, 09:54 AM
Ahh... This makes sense. I knew they might shoot it down, but did not know that they had to. The ministry of defence or whoever makes the decision to shoot a plane down, knew that this 93 plane was going to crash. I think they were hoping for it to land somewhere, but then it began crashing down. Guess they simply had to shoot it down after that.

I have heard that there will be alot of shooting stars on 9/11. I think I will go out and watch them, and wishing all well for those that lost their lives on that dreadfull day.

albie
10-09-2007, 11:30 AM
Back on Sept 12 2001 while I was sitting around watching CNN with my parents wondering if our flight to Vegas was going to happen on Sept 13. We were watching CNN or something similiar ... they mentioning the United 93 crash debris and how difficult it was to retrieve the wreckage. It was mentioned that the debris was scattered over 5 miles..... I am no rocket scientist but I assume that when a plane crashes parts of it dont hit the ground then go flying through the air for 5 miles. Well that day I came to the conclusion that it was indeed shot down. This expains the drawn out crash debris from the midair impact.
Strange how soon afterwards they made the passengers to be heros who forced the plane to crash after struggling with the hijackers. In my opinion the government didnt want the public to know that they had shot down the plane given the circumstances surrounding the supposed phone calls that passengers were trying to take back control of the plane.
Funny thing is I never heard another mention of the fact of the 5 mile crash site for United 93 .... strange but true.


They meant that debris reached 5 miles away. Blown by the wind. It was just fabric and paper.

And it wasn't 5 miles. You are talking about Indian lake which had light debris in it. The distance calculated from the crash site is 4 miles...BY ROAD. but as the crow flies (a straight line) it's 1.5 miles.

Easily reached by light debris with thewind.

This is an old conspiracy theory debunked long ago.

Still held up by people not listening.

kblood
10-09-2007, 07:06 PM
They meant that debris reached 5 miles away. Blown by the wind. It was just fabric and paper.

And it wasn't 5 miles. You are talking about Indian lake which had light debris in it. The distance calculated from the crash site is 4 miles...BY ROAD. but as the crow flies (a straight line) it's 1.5 miles.

Easily reached by light debris with thewind.

This is an old conspiracy theory debunked long ago.

Still held up by people not listening.

Conspiracy theory how? If the plane is hijacked and going kamikaze on important US buildings, then it is very likely that it gets shot down. That it will probably also be covered up is then due to the fact that it doesnt really sound good to the public that it had to be done.

albie
11-09-2007, 11:58 AM
I'm just saying that the idea of debris spreading to several miles away is NOT proof of the plane being shot down.

And shouldn't be used as evidence.