PDA

View Full Version : Lawyers Claim of Right


rob menard
11-09-2009, 06:07 PM
MEMORANDUM

Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right

Of John Peter Gorman, A Freeman On The Land.

Whereas it is my understanding that the CANADA is a common law

jurisdiction;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that a statute is defined as a legislated rule of a society which has been given the force of law, and,

AND Whereas it is my understanding that a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,

AND Whereas it is my understanding that the only form of government recognized as lawful in the United Kingdom is a representative one;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that representation requires mutual consent;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent, neither representation nor governance can exist;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that all Acts are Statutes, restricted in scope and applicability by The British North America Act, 1867, and The Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960, and the Constiution Act, 1983;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that said scope and applicability Acts, Statutes and Bylaws of the Federal, Provincial and Municipal Governments in Canada is limited to members and employees of government;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that those who have a SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER [S.I.N. #] are, in fact, employees of the CANADIAN Government, and thus are bound by the Statutes created by the Federal Government;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that human beings in the CANADA have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented, and thus governed;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that if anyone does revoke or deny Consent, they exist free of Government control and Statutory restraints;


AND Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked Consent and does exist free of Statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations,


AND Whereas I, John Peter Gorman, am a Freeman-on-the-Land,

AND Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action;

AND Whereas I am not a child, and having attained the age of eighteen years or more;

AND Whereas I am a peaceful human being;


AND Whereas I am a Freeman-on-the-Land, who operates with full responsibility, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that a by-law is defined as a rule of a Corporation;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that Corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exist any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge, as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate one’s actions;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it;


AND Whereas it is my understanding that a Summons of a Court is merely an invitation to attend and creates no obligation or dishonour, if ignored;

AND Whereas it is my understanding that Peace Officers have a duty to distinguish between Statute and Law, and those who attempt to enforce Statutes against A Freeman-on-the-Land, are, in fact, breaking the COMMON law;

AND Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with Peace Officers who have not observed me breach the peace;

AND Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence, barring any Peace Officer or Prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time.

Therefore be it now known to any, and all concerned and affected parties, that I, John Peter Gorman, of the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, in the Country and Territory known as CANADA, that I AM Freeman-on-the-Land, AND I do hereby state clearly, specifically, and unequivocally my intent to live peacefully and lawfully, AND to exist free of all Statutory obligations and restrictions of any Federal, Provincial or Municipal Government in Canada, and to maintain all my inalienable rights at law to trade, exchange or barter.

Without in any way restricting the generality of the foregoing statement, I, furthermore, claim the right to lawfully:

1. exercise my right and lawful obligation to renounce, revoke and forever after the day of execution of this document a SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER [S.I.N.] issued by the Government of Canada as:



406-634-477



issued to a corporation known as JOHN PETER GORMAN.

I am not that ficticious person, nor do I consent to acting on behalf of that corporation. I, as a Freeman On The Land, did not knowingly accept this S.I.N., [Social Insurance Number] or consent to the fraudulent activities that were to be played on my by the Federal Government, and foisted on every other Canadian person, the real persons of the land known as Canada.

2. exercise my “common law right to travel”, unhindered, unencumbered, at my discretion, in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed automobile. I hereby renounce, relinguish, and return an Ontario Driver’s Licence Number G6613-40774-50301, made out to a JOHN PETER GORMAN, a ficticious corporation of the State of Canada, to which I do not belong, as I am a real person living in the land mass known as Canada, and I no longer give my CONSENT to the Provincial Government of Ontario or its Peace Officers or Judicial Representatives to control my movements on foot, or in or on a vehicle of my choosing at any time or place;

3. exercise my God given and inalienable right to travel throughout the world, as stated in the Holy Bible;

4. exercise my “common law right” to refuse to obtain by submission, any application for any government issued license, permit or seek permission to perform any fundamentally lawful action or, to enter into any government contract under duress, threat and/or intimidation, which would involve committing an act of fraud and/or theft, or any other crime, by way of deception by “I” and/or any involved Government principal, employee or agent, (in compliance with my Common Law Rights, the Magna Carta, The BNA Act, The Bill of Rights, and the Constitution of Canada, etc).

5. exercise my right to possess, cultivate or use medicinally any plant,

vegetable, or fruit, as I see fit from time to time.

6. exercise my right to possess unregistered, unlicensed firearms and ammunition, and to use the same for target practice at a range, or hunting for food, and further I swear under oath, never to open fire on another human being, unless as a last resort to protect human life, either my own, my family and friend and foe alike.

I claim that, pursuant to any action by any Government and/or any Principal, Member, Employee, Agent, Servant, Person thereof, in the Right of the Crown, the Federal or Provincial Government, or a municipality:

“I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, and I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any contract or commercial agreement not revealed to myself, which are my rights pursuant to Common Law”. In this regard, I hereby renounce and revoke my Ontario BIRTH CERTIFICATE, issued as Certificate Number 98-254921-01, issued to my Mother, Rita Bernice LaFrance, and my Father, Peter Robert Gorman, on or about April 16th, 1945, alleging that I was born a Male on or about March 01, 1945, an act which apparently gave my parents’ CONSENT to make me a chattel and an employee of the Federal Government of Canada, which thereupon created a ficticious corporation which was incorporated by the name of JOHN PETER GORMAN, which is not the way that I spell my name in law, and I will no longer, from this day forward, be considered a chattel or employee of the Federal Government of Canada.

Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions, and I further claim that all property held by me under common law, being any and all intellectual property, real estate, trade tools, private automobile(s) and contents, firearms and ammunition, potted plants; contents at the any private residence that I may reside in from time to time are held under MY Claim of Right.

Furthermore, I claim that the Federal or Provincial or Municipal Government has no claim to any assets of mine whatsoever, and anything that I own now, or at the date of my death, will devolve to my children and grandchildren ONLY, and not one asset shall be released to the Crown in the Right of Canada or Ontario.

Furthermore, I claim that the intentional blurring of the lines with smoke and mirrors, deception, outright lies and committed frauds by all levels of government, too numerous to mention, false claims as to the well settled division, between the Crown created legal entity known as the “PERSON”, and the flesh and blood creation of the Creator known as a “man”, is nothing short of theft, fraud, breach of trust, and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form.

Furthermore, I claim that “all persons, acting as, governments, principals, employees, agents and justice system participants claiming, “retained legal counsel” have, by virtue of their own and/or their principals actions, claimed “total incompetence”, in handling any of their own affairs in law and have become an instant ward of the court, hence, they are imprisoned by their own actions in hand or lack thereof.

Furthermore, I claim that, due to the self evident facts in truth at hand, that all persons, the Crown, governments, principals, employees, agents and justice system participants, claiming limited liability or immunity, are doing so under the pretence of being in fact, are deemed totally incompetent and under law, made instant wards of the Crown and/or court, and therefore, cannot claim good faith or colour of right over anyone who is thus blessed as being a competent heir.

Furthermore, I claim that, “Ignorance of the Law” is not a lawful or legal claim, when used by the Crown, government principals, employees, agents and justice system participants, at any and all levels to my harm or detriment, especially by those claiming limited liability.

Furthermore, I claim that these actions of mine herein are not outside my communities’ standards, and will, in fact, support the said community(s) in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities, after having been served with this Notice of Claim, and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim, is breaking the law, cannot claim “good faith” or “colour of right”, and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.

Furthermore, I claim that the courts in the CANADA are de-facto, and are, in fact, in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests, and I further claim that they require the consent of ALL parties prior to providing any such services.

Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of ALL parties, and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act or Statute or bylaw, for as herein stated, as a Freeman-on-the Land, I am not subject to any Act.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by Peace Officers, Government Principals, Agents or Justice System Participants is THE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($300.00 / hr..) PER HOUR, or any portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated, or in any way detained, harassed, searched or otherwise regulated, and TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ($2500.00/hr.) PER HOUR, or portion thereof, if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated, or subjected to any adjudication process, without my express written and Notarised Consent.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors, who by their actions or omissions, harm my interests or me, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially Criminal actions of any Peace Officers, Government Principals, Agents or Justice System participants, who having been served Notice of this Claim, and fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim, and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim that the law of Agent and Principal does apply, and that service upon one is equal to service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly, and in an open forum, using discussion and negotiations, and to capture on videotape and tape recorder all of said discussions and negotiations for whatever lawful purpose that I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims, must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of this Notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten (10) days from the date of original service, as attested to by way of certificate of service.

Failure to register a dispute against claims made herein will result in an automatic Default Judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence, barring the bringing of charges under any Statute or Act against myself, a Freeman-on-the-Land.

John Peter Gorman, B.A., LL.B.

Place of Claim of Right: TORONTO, Ontario, Canada

Dated: __________________________________

Claimant Signature: ______________________

Notary Public: ___________________________

Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only, and does not constitute a change in status, or entrance or acceptance of aForeign Jurisdiction.

Visit my website for more information on your Rights and Freedoms, or lack thereof: www.CAPtainCanadaCrusades.ca

SEE NEXT PAGE FOR THE NAMES AND INSTITUTIONS THAT HIS NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT HAS BEEN SENT TO ON THE DATE ABOVE WRITTEN.

TO: 1. THE PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA: STEPHEN

HARPER, AND HIS SUCCESSORS; ALL MINISTERS IN THE FEDERAL CABINET;

2. THE PREMIER OF ONTARIO, DALTON MCGUINTY, AND HIS SUCCESSORS; ALL MINISTERS IN THE PROVINCIAL CABINET;

3. CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA, AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPERIOR AND PROVINCIAL COURTS OF ONTARIO;

4. THE CHIEFS OF POLICE OF THE FOLLOWING FORCES: a) ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE; b) ONTARIO PROVINCIAL POLICE;

c) METROPOLITIN TORONT0 POLICE DEPARTMENT

zhenshanren
11-09-2009, 07:02 PM
Just pointing out a typo in case it's overlooked.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by Peace Officers, Government Principals, Agents or Justice System Participants is THE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($300.00 / hr..) PER HOUR, or any portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated, or in any way detained, harassed, searched or otherwise regulated, and TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ($2500.00/hr.) PER HOUR, or portion thereof, if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated, or subjected to any adjudication process, without my express written and Notarised Consent.

acceptance of aForeign Jurisdiction.
Also need a space here

the worm that turned
11-09-2009, 07:09 PM
Excuse the dumb question, and I know the title says "lawyers claim of right" but are we actually saying here that a lawyer has become a freeman on the land with his NOI and COR?????

Isn't this quite monumental if true!!!!!!!!!!!!:):):):)

tien an
11-09-2009, 07:40 PM
Hi Rob,

(your party in Kelowna looked good!)

The title of your post is 'Lawyers Claim of Right'...did a lawyer author this?

Peace,

tian an.

EDIT: Sorry; should have refreshed the page after eating dinner...and leaving this on the screen, then I would have seen Wormy's question.

the worm that turned
11-09-2009, 07:47 PM
Hi Rob,

(your party in Kelowna looked good!)

The title of your post is 'Lawyers Claim of Right'...did a lawyer author this?

Peace,

tian an.

EDIT: Sorry; should have refreshed the page after eating dinner...and leaving this on the screen, then I would have seen Wormy's question.

just looked him up and he is an ex lawyer who was debarred (EDIT: might have just made that word up) for attempting to expose the bank fraud.

I'd imagine any law society member would be severely reprimanded for becoming or supporting FMOTL

yozhik
11-09-2009, 08:31 PM
he is an ex lawyer who was debarred (EDIT: might have just made that word up) for attempting to expose the bank fraud.


Says it all, doesn't it?
For trying to expose a fraud?

Hmmmm ... in some countries, you'd be given a medal.
The Law Society kicks you out.

:D

makeithappen
11-09-2009, 11:34 PM
I'm still learning this but in ref. to vehicle below, does this need to be an automobile?

2. exercise my “common law right to travel”, unhindered, unencumbered, at my discretion, in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed automobile. I hereby renounce, relinguish, and return an Ontario Driver’s Licence Number G6613-40774-50301, made out to a JOHN PETER GORMAN, a ficticious corporation of the State of Canada, to which I do not belong, as I am a real person living in the land mass known as Canada, and I no longer give my CONSENT to the Provincial Government of Ontario or its Peace Officers or Judicial Representatives to control my movements on foot, or in or on a vehicle of my choosing at any time or place;

tien an
12-09-2009, 12:09 AM
I'm still learning this but in ref. to vehicle below, does this need to be an automobile?

2. exercise my “common law right to travel”, unhindered, unencumbered, at my discretion, in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed automobile. I hereby renounce, relinguish, and return an Ontario Driver’s Licence Number G6613-40774-50301, made out to a JOHN PETER GORMAN, a ficticious corporation of the State of Canada, to which I do not belong, as I am a real person living in the land mass known as Canada, and I no longer give my CONSENT to the Provincial Government of Ontario or its Peace Officers or Judicial Representatives to control my movements on foot, or in or on a vehicle of my choosing at any time or place;

Yes, you are still learning (not being condescending).



A vehicle is 'any conveyance in or by which people or objects are transported, esp. one fitted with wheels. (Collins Concise)

and....

"motor vehicle For the purposes of the Road Traffic Acts, any mechanically
propelled vehicle intended or adapted for use on the roads. This includes motor cars
(vehicles of not more than 3 tonnes in unladen weight, designed to carry loads or up
to seven passengers) and motor cycles(vehicles of not more than 8 cwt in unladen
weight and having less than four wheels). A car from which the engine has been
removed may still be considered to be mechanically propelled if the removal is
temporary, but if so many parts have been removed that it cannot be restored to
use at a reasonable expense, it ceases to be mechanically propelled. A dumper used
for carrying materials at a building site is not intended for use on roads, even if it is
in fact used on a road near the building site; and a go-kart is not intended nor
adapted for use on the roads (even though it is capable of being used on the roads).
See also CONVEYANCE". (Oxford Dic. of Law 5th Ed.)

Whilst 'motor vehicle, vehicle, car and motor car' are terms used above...'automobile' is not.
It's not included in the terminology of the Acts and therefore doesn't fall under their jurisdiction.

This seems to me to be the basis of the reasoning.

PS I'm a bit concerned about him using the term 'conveyance' though...look at the last line of the Law Dic. definition!

tien an
12-09-2009, 12:13 AM
Says it all, doesn't it?
For trying to expose a fraud?

Hmmmm ... in some countries, you'd be given a medal.
The Law Society kicks you out.

:D

not 'a' fraud mate...The Fraud!

rob menard
12-09-2009, 11:13 AM
I was told he is a lawyer and that he had been disbarred but then re-instated. Am not sure though.
Rob

bsmurph83
12-09-2009, 11:25 AM
he tried to expose the banking fraud???

that is either one very brave or very stupid man. all i can say is that i hope he wasn't surprised by the outcome... still, good on him for trying. but the world just ain't ready for that yet...

always good to have a (former) lawyer join the freeman ranks!

yozhik
12-09-2009, 01:40 PM
I was told he is a lawyer and that he had been disbarred but then re-instated. Am not sure though.
Rob

Did he repent?
Go to lawyer confession?
Promise not to be a naughty boy ever again and took an oath never to utter the words; "I am not a person; I am a man"?

:D

bsmurph83
12-09-2009, 03:47 PM
Did he repent?
Go to lawyer confession?
Promise not to be a naughty boy ever again and took an oath never to utter the words; "I am not a person; I am a man"?

:D



"Forgive me Father, for I have sinned..."

"Excellent, welcome to the Law Society!"

yozhik
12-09-2009, 05:17 PM
"Forgive me Father, for I have sinned..."


"Yes, yes ... sit down ... relax boy ...
Now then ... when you say you have sinned ... define "sin" for me ... would you be referring to the biblical sin, the lawful sin, the plain English sin or the curly wurly, how's ya father, ask no questions get no lies, a wink's as good as a nudge, I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts, Tarquin Fintimlinbinwhinbimlim Bus Stop F'tang F'tang Ole Biscuit-Barrel, LEGAL sin?"

girlgye
12-09-2009, 05:25 PM
Note how he puts LLB in his CoR. There you will find the clue.

bsmurph83
12-09-2009, 05:48 PM
"Yes, yes ... sit down ... relax boy ...
Now then ... when you say you have sinned ... define "sin" for me ... would you be referring to the biblical sin, the lawful sin, the plain English sin or the curly wurly, how's ya father, ask no questions get no lies, a wink's as good as a nudge, I've got a lovely bunch of coconuts, Tarquin Fintimlinbinwhinbimlim Bus Stop F'tang F'tang Ole Biscuit-Barrel, LEGAL sin?"

lol you've said quite a mouthful there...

"i've got a lovely bunch of coconuts" bwahahah... i'm easily entertained :D

zhenshanren
12-09-2009, 06:26 PM
Note how he puts LLB in his CoR

girlguy, could you dumb this down for us newbies please? :o
Thanks!

tien an
12-09-2009, 08:13 PM
"yes, yes ... Sit down ... Relax boy ...
Now then ... When you say you have sinned ... Define "sin" for me ... Would you be referring to the biblical sin, the lawful sin, the plain english sin or the curly wurly, how's ya father, ask no questions get no lies, a wink's as good as a nudge, i've got a lovely bunch of coconuts, tarquin fintimlinbinwhinbimlim bus stop f'tang f'tang ole biscuit-barrel, legal sin?"

lmfao!:d

tien an
12-09-2009, 08:14 PM
girlguy, could you dumb this down for us newbies please? :o
Thanks!

I'll second that...what does that mean, gg?

(One google later....) http://www.londonexternal.ac.uk/prospective_students/undergraduate/panel/law/index.shtml :O

tien an
12-09-2009, 08:15 PM
lol you've said quite a mouthful there...

"i've got a lovely bunch of coconuts" bwahahah... i'm easily entertained :D

It's (all) a quote from when British Comedy was funny...but I can't remember what it was....

bsmurph83
13-09-2009, 03:51 AM
It's (all) a quote from when British Comedy was funny...but I can't remember what it was....

it sounds a bit like Monty Python... whatever it is, it's genius :)

yozhik
13-09-2009, 11:43 AM
it sounds a bit like Monty Python... whatever it is, it's genius :)

The "f'tang f'tang" portion is from the Monty Python local election skit. i.e Tarquin from the Silly Party. :)

The remainder is random shrapnel fragments from a humour minefield, as staked out on the mind map of yours truly.

bsmurph83
13-09-2009, 12:29 PM
The "f'tang f'tang" portion is from the Monty Python local election skit. i.e Tarquin from the Silly Party. :)

The remainder is random shrapnel fragments from a humour minefield, as staked out on the mind map of yours truly.

*chuckles*

tool. :D

girlgye
13-09-2009, 04:51 PM
lmfao!:d

muwaaaaaaaaaaaahhha DITTO