PDA

View Full Version : 1 in 4 in Britain a PERVERT


blueyonder2012
11-09-2009, 12:17 PM
ACHTUNG Now Big Brother targets helpful parents as one in four Britons are to be vetted for giant child protection database

Daily Mail | Article (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212637/Now-Big-Brother-targets-helpful-parents-1-4-Britons-vetted-giant-new-child-protection-database.html)

Parents could face a £5,000 fine for driving their children's friends to a sports event or Cub Scout meeting.

They face punishment and a criminal record if they have not been vetted first by a massive new government agency.

An astonishing 11.3million people - one adult in four - are likely to come under the watchful eye of the Independent Safeguarding Authority.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212637/Now-Big-Brother-targets-helpful-parents-1-4-Britons-vetted-giant-new-child-protection-database.html

:eek:

djhooker
11-09-2009, 12:46 PM
i stumbled across this in our favourite of papers, the metro. a very small article too.

this simply will not do.

all because of that ian huntley business apparently too.

funny how they'll dig up a story and attach their bullshit ideas to it.

ozpixie
11-09-2009, 01:45 PM
Could it be that because perverts and child abuse is so rife in exclusive British schools they think it's everywhere? Can't trust their own so they don't trust anyone.

monkeyboy
11-09-2009, 02:06 PM
at £100 a pop it`s a good earner aswell. but i heard that if you are a voulnteer it will be free. but that includes people who car share on the school run or a relative who takes them or picks them up, youth club workers, scout and guide leaders. so i think the 1.3 million estimate is very low.

ronisron
11-09-2009, 02:45 PM
:rolleyes:

What a bullshit scam. Who makes this stuff up?

rhydra
11-09-2009, 04:19 PM
If someone is a pervert and they are on a database, won't that be like a huge dating agency for child molesters then?

blueyonder2012
11-09-2009, 04:24 PM
There is more than 4 posts / people on this thread - Come on which one is the pervert??? :D:D:D;)


:eek::D

radford
11-09-2009, 04:37 PM
In fact it is 1 in 3 because the CRB check people HAVE TO HAVE THIS ONE AS WELL !!! Crazy. So it is nearly 20 million people. 1 in 3 of the UK population.

I wrote about this in the thread THE DATABASE a couple of days ago on here.

This whole DATABASE seems to be an ID CARD database by stealth.

They will have to issue a CARD to show you have passed this "DATABASE TEST" or it is unenforceable by POLICY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. Then once that is found to be hard we will all be chipped with the information.

Note the £64 cost is similar to the ID Card cost. Whereas the CRB Check is only £36........

Anyone beginning to spot the LIE with this DATABASE.

This IS THE ID DATABASE COMING IN THROUGH THE BACK DOOR.

The pervert bit is just a cover story........this is the REAL DEAL. The BIG BROTHER DATABASE that David Icke warned the world about in the 90s./

jhado
11-09-2009, 07:53 PM
Say I was a potential kiddy-fiddler, but with no criminal record.

I could pass a check, and be allowed access to kids.

So it's just another way of the "Cunts-that-be" promoting their paedo ways.

chaste
11-09-2009, 07:57 PM
There is more than 4 posts / people on this thread - Come on which one is the pervert??? :D:D:D;)


:eek::D


Is it me? I only read it because it had the word 'pervert' and was hoping to meet like-minded individuals. Looks like it might be the wrong kind, though.

bluefeather
12-09-2009, 10:03 AM
I knew this was going to happen. As soon as I heard about the cabbies protesting about one man and his spent conviction undermining their profession, I knew it would result in the whole CRB issue being put in the public domain once more.
We've witnessed an overwhelming erosion of rights, freedom and democracy in the last few years and I do not understand the mentality of some people who proffer the following: 'If you've nothing to hide, what's the probem?' In theory, perhaps, in practice however, it doesn't work.
Here's a working example: a few years ago we were burgled (by someone we know). My partner agreed to go to court to give evidence. At he time he was a uni student and on the day of the hearing he was in a lab doing practical work. He had to leave what he was doing, rush over to court on the other side of town and park the car, etc, give evidence and rush back to uni for a meeting. When he arrived at court he was picked up on the metal detector - he'd forgotten to leave his one inch knife he'd earlier been using for splicing specimans in the lab. Result? He was formally cautioned, even though he could prove where he'd come from and what he'd been doing. Further result? He couldn't consider a teaching profession.
He used to be one of those that thought 'if you've nothing to hide...' Not any more.
These cabbies have, in my opinion, gone about this in the wrong way. By going to the press all that they will achieve is a further tightening of the existing CRB rules in terms of who can work in a particular job, and where. In other words, their 'pride' will affect everyone else.
The enhanced disclosure was borne out of the Solham murders, but its scope has steadily widened to include many other employees.
I believe that at some point in the near future, we will all have to be CRB checked.
It's the youngsters I feel particularly sorry for. Quite a few teenagers find themselves having 'a brush with the law' at some point, but most grow up and go on to lead good lives. What are the implications here for them? Career possibilities ended before they've even left school.

archemis
12-09-2009, 10:48 AM
They make these figures up, and publish the statistic / story to keep people in a state of fear / loathing / contempt and to distract them from what is 'really' important .... and it works every time, with every bit of so called 'bad news'.

A x

largejack
12-09-2009, 10:59 AM
This is not funny it just creates more suspision and paranoia:mad:

archemis
12-09-2009, 11:29 AM
This is not funny it just creates more suspision and paranoia:mad:

Yes, I forgot to add 'suspicion and paranoia' to the list. News is news, so called perverts are perverts ... suspicion and paranoia are feelings and emotions, they are objective and we ourselves create them, not the news.

If the people behind the headlines and the statistics were more open and preceded every article with 'this is being printed to make you afraid' or 'this is being published to make you suspicious', would they be as effective? Your negative emotions only serve to affect you, they do nothing to reduce the no. of people that engage in activities such as paedophilia . . if anything, they assist them and keep you locked in the lower vibrations of their negative reality.

A x