mada88
21-08-2007, 02:02 PM
This is a reply thread for one about Alan Watt claiming David Icke is a mason. Its from http://matterik.com its from Matteriks own blog very interesting.
Morals and Dogma, 18th degree:
Of the whole of mankind, not one in ten thousand has any aspirations
beyond the daily needs of the gross animal life. In this
age and in all others, all men except a few, in most countries, are
born to be mere beasts of burden, co-laborers with the horse and
the ox.
Alan Watts interpretation :
Albert Pike said that "man who would not reason (think and use his own observations), a man who could not reason for himself is therefore a beast of burden and meat on the table by choice and consent."
Alan Watt on The grand Chessboard :
Alan: And they wrote about it before it happened. Brzezinski said, the project for a New American Century this little private club with Chaney and Wolfowitz and Pearl and all the rest of them they printed that two editions in the ‘90s that they wanted to takeover Afghanistan first, then Iraq then Iran then Syria and then Brzezinski wrote it a member of the same group in his book, The Grand Chessboard" the same agenda. Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and then he said we’ll need something to happen in America on the same scale as a Pearl Harbor attack to motivate the people with the public opinion behind us and low and behold they get the very thing they need. This is impossible. It’s like basing everything on winning the lotto.
Alan: Well I do know that they've said many, many years ago that 2001 is the kickoff time and of course we can find that confirmed in the little click at the top of the Bush Administration and behind the Bush Administration which put forth the policy for the New American Century and they published their findings back in '92 and republished them in '98 and in there they said they would have to attack the Middle East beginning with Afghanistan which they did followed by Iraq, followed by Iran then Syria. Now in 1998, we find Zbigniew Brzezinski brought out his book called The Grand Chessboard, and being a member of the same group he reiterated those same targets in the same order and he said we shall make something on a Pearl Harbor event, on the scale of that event to motive the American people behind us.
I have checked through the grand chessboard and I dont find anywhere anything about the exact order stated : afghanistan, iraq, iran, syria.
However I did find a letter written by PNAC to Bush on the 20th of september 2001 that states it in a way.
You can read it here http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm
Alan Watt on Thatcher :
Alan: Now here's the crux of this thing, as this guy is leading you up to the perception that you’re suppose to glean from this or arrive at. It was put forth by Maggie Thatcher in a speech she gave a Massey Hall, one of many speeches across the world, entitled, "The New World Order," when she discussed that the war that would have to come on religion, especially fundamentalist orthodox religions. She mentioned, too, at the time, that she and many other ex-prime ministers, presidents, and dictators, leaders of countries—never leave office. They belong to a higher organization that works behind the scenes, networks with each other, because democracy, you see is too slow. The public show that we get is too slow; and that's really what they're pushing towards. The need for private organizations of experts, skilled people, to move quickly, more swiftly than democratic debates, and that's what we have today, in fact. We've had them for a long time, in reality. This book here, partly, is to get the public or the think tanks that will implement these ideas and market them to newspapers and journalists, who then market it back to us. It's to get them to go along with this, the reasoning in it, the reasonableness in it, in fact.
I have browsed and searched through the speech and I cannot find what he is talking about. Here is the url to the speech : http://www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches/displaydocument.asp?docid=108325
Morals and Dogma, 18th degree:
Of the whole of mankind, not one in ten thousand has any aspirations
beyond the daily needs of the gross animal life. In this
age and in all others, all men except a few, in most countries, are
born to be mere beasts of burden, co-laborers with the horse and
the ox.
Alan Watts interpretation :
Albert Pike said that "man who would not reason (think and use his own observations), a man who could not reason for himself is therefore a beast of burden and meat on the table by choice and consent."
Alan Watt on The grand Chessboard :
Alan: And they wrote about it before it happened. Brzezinski said, the project for a New American Century this little private club with Chaney and Wolfowitz and Pearl and all the rest of them they printed that two editions in the ‘90s that they wanted to takeover Afghanistan first, then Iraq then Iran then Syria and then Brzezinski wrote it a member of the same group in his book, The Grand Chessboard" the same agenda. Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and then he said we’ll need something to happen in America on the same scale as a Pearl Harbor attack to motivate the people with the public opinion behind us and low and behold they get the very thing they need. This is impossible. It’s like basing everything on winning the lotto.
Alan: Well I do know that they've said many, many years ago that 2001 is the kickoff time and of course we can find that confirmed in the little click at the top of the Bush Administration and behind the Bush Administration which put forth the policy for the New American Century and they published their findings back in '92 and republished them in '98 and in there they said they would have to attack the Middle East beginning with Afghanistan which they did followed by Iraq, followed by Iran then Syria. Now in 1998, we find Zbigniew Brzezinski brought out his book called The Grand Chessboard, and being a member of the same group he reiterated those same targets in the same order and he said we shall make something on a Pearl Harbor event, on the scale of that event to motive the American people behind us.
I have checked through the grand chessboard and I dont find anywhere anything about the exact order stated : afghanistan, iraq, iran, syria.
However I did find a letter written by PNAC to Bush on the 20th of september 2001 that states it in a way.
You can read it here http://www.newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm
Alan Watt on Thatcher :
Alan: Now here's the crux of this thing, as this guy is leading you up to the perception that you’re suppose to glean from this or arrive at. It was put forth by Maggie Thatcher in a speech she gave a Massey Hall, one of many speeches across the world, entitled, "The New World Order," when she discussed that the war that would have to come on religion, especially fundamentalist orthodox religions. She mentioned, too, at the time, that she and many other ex-prime ministers, presidents, and dictators, leaders of countries—never leave office. They belong to a higher organization that works behind the scenes, networks with each other, because democracy, you see is too slow. The public show that we get is too slow; and that's really what they're pushing towards. The need for private organizations of experts, skilled people, to move quickly, more swiftly than democratic debates, and that's what we have today, in fact. We've had them for a long time, in reality. This book here, partly, is to get the public or the think tanks that will implement these ideas and market them to newspapers and journalists, who then market it back to us. It's to get them to go along with this, the reasoning in it, the reasonableness in it, in fact.
I have browsed and searched through the speech and I cannot find what he is talking about. Here is the url to the speech : http://www.margaretthatcher.org/speeches/displaydocument.asp?docid=108325