PDA

View Full Version : Fallacy


stfd
09-09-2009, 07:43 PM
Some (many) live with the misconception that religions cause people in general to be and act offensivelly towards eachother.

This fallacy is so deeply burrowed in people's counsiousness that is one of the most perpetrated 'things' nowdays.

Various 'examples' are given to sort of back this fallacy, the wars of the crusades, the inquisition, the conquest of the Americas or various 'local' happenings which are deemed as propper facts of religion being something which causes harm to people.

I know is not so, i know that this 'ideea' of religion being the cause of bad stuff is a manufactured concept which made its way to people minds via various ways.
Certain individuals along the way in history served towards this goal which in turn serves to achieve an even greater goal.
That goal is to attain a state of 'diluted' essence in people's souls , so that they no longer belong, feel and think - as they were made to be.
The goal is to have people reject religion(s) so that mammon can have his own religion implemented.The seeds of this new religion have already been planted and they are being watered every day by the ways of our deeds and actions.

Perhaps many woke up only to continue sleeping another much worse sleep.
The perpetual nightmare is the next step.

danceswithbunnies
09-09-2009, 08:08 PM
Some (many) live with the misconception that religions cause people in general to be and act offensivelly towards eachother.

This fallacy is so deeply burrowed in people's counsiousness that is one of the most perpetrated 'things' nowdays.

Various 'examples' are given to sort of back this fallacy, the wars of the crusades, the inquisition, the conquest of the Americas or various 'local' happenings which are deemed as propper facts of religion being something which causes harm to people.

I know is not so, i know that this 'ideea' of religion being the cause of bad stuff is a manufactured concept which made its way to people minds via various ways.
Certain individuals along the way in history served towards this goal which in turn serves to achieve an even greater goal.
That goal is to attain a state of 'diluted' essence in people's souls , so that they no longer belong, feel and think - as they were made to be.
The goal is to have people reject religion(s) so that mammon can have his own religion implemented.The seeds of this new religion have already been planted and they are being watered every day by the ways of our deeds and actions.

Perhaps many woke up only to continue sleeping another much worse sleep.
The perpetual nightmare is the next step.

Yes...slaughtering entire populations should in no wise be considered "offensive".

All conceptions are MANUFACTURED...and mankind has always used these conceptions as an excuse to slaughter one another.


You talk about "fallacies" and then go on to make many assertions which are pure flights of speculation.
As in:

*Certain people have worked in concert throughout history to make religion look like the cause of bad stuff (as you put it) because they are serving a hidden goal.


*The goal the previously mentioned colluders is working towards is the dilution of soul essence..so that they will be unnatural (ignoring that religion is manufactured and that it has made people unnatural because the irony might make me cackle)

*The goal they work toward is for people to reject religion..so that the goal (unmentioned) of mammon can be implemented..

Okay anyway...Produce evidence of this...
Produce said people and the evidence that they were colluding towards said goal.

And you might want to study up on what fallacies actually are.

stfd
09-09-2009, 08:34 PM
Yes...slaughtering entire populations should in no wise be considered "offensive".

All conceptions are MANUFACTURED...and mankind has always used these conceptions as an excuse to slaughter one another.


You talk about "fallacies" and then go on to make many assertions which are pure flights of speculation.
As in:

*Certain people have worked in concert throughout history to make religion look like the cause of bad stuff (as you put it) because they are serving a hidden goal.


*The goal the previously mentioned colluders is working towards is the dilution of soul essence..so that they will be unnatural (ignoring that religion is manufactured and that it has made people unnatural because the irony might make me cackle)

*The goal they work toward is for people to reject religion..so that the goal (unmentioned) of mammon can be implemented..

Okay anyway...Produce evidence of this...
Produce said people and the evidence that they were colluding towards said goal.

And you might want to study up on what fallacies actually are.



Ummm so it goes like this.
God made us all,God died for our sins so that we may have a chance at eternity.
Then God had His Word put in words viw the Bible.
Then some random 'dudes' came along and at an increasing rate worked towards tainting this 'Word' this message.
Then you came and said religion is an evil.
Then i said it is not.
Then you ask that i provide proof that 'the perception of reality' has been distorted.

Are you okay?

danceswithbunnies
09-09-2009, 08:46 PM
Ummm so it goes like this.
God made us all,God died for our sins so that we may have a chance at eternity.
Then God had His Word put in words viw the Bible.
Then some random 'dudes' came along and at an increasing rate worked towards tainting this 'Word' this message.



That is not "evidence" of anything...that is a bunch of assertions strung together in a chain.

If you cannot show evidence of assertion one:
God made us all

Nor of assertion two:
God died for our sins

Why should i believe anything you say?

Then you came and said religion is an evil.
Then i said it is not.

where did i say that AGAIN?

It has been used FOR evil...where did i assert that it itself was actually evil?

Then you ask that i provide proof that 'the perception of reality' has been distorted.

the implied inference in this statement is that your "perception of reality" has not been "distorted..

You can attempt to do the buddhist/existentialist thingee, but i don't think it will work for you ..at least not with me..having read Francis Schaeffer's arguments in that respect, and having read many buddhist writings..


Are you okay?

Backhanded ad hominems aside, do you have any evidence or are you simply going to assert your "undistorted" perception based on belief of things that you have not produced any evidence to support?

Your reasoning is looking suspiciously like that on
Monty Pythons Witch trial scene:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr8DIg3oHFI

stfd
09-09-2009, 09:17 PM
That is not "evidence" of anything...that is a bunch of assertions strung together in a chain.

If you cannot show evidence of assertion one:
God made us all

Nor of assertion two:
God died for our sins

Why should i believe anything you say?



where did i say that AGAIN?

It has been used FOR evil...where did i assert that it itself was actually evil?



the implied inference in this statement is that your "perception of reality" has not been "distorted..

You can attempt to do the buddhist/existentialist thingee, but i don't think it will work for you ..at least not with me..having read Francis Schaeffer's arguments in that respect, and having read many buddhist writings..



Backhanded ad hominems aside, do you have any evidence or are you simply going to assert your "undistorted" perception based on belief of things that you have not produced any evidence to support?

Your reasoning is looking suspiciously like that on
Monty Pythons Witch trial scene:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr8DIg3oHFI


i dont put you to trial.
but you do put me.

the trial is on.

danceswithbunnies
09-09-2009, 09:45 PM
i dont put you to trial.
but you do put me.

the trial is on.


Au contrare..you mentioned fallacy, and i merely asked you to provide evidence of your assertions..

stfd
09-09-2009, 09:48 PM
Au contrare..you mentioned fallacy, and i merely asked you to provide evidence of your assertions..

The problem is i dont have a Bible on me to give propper proof right now.
Oh wait.. you wouldnt accept that as a form of proof wouldnt you?

Well, thats all i got aside my feelings; and they back up eachother too.

danceswithbunnies
09-09-2009, 09:57 PM
The problem is i dont have a Bible on me to give propper proof right now.
Oh wait.. you wouldnt accept that as a form of proof wouldnt you?

Well, thats all i got aside my feelings; and they back up eachother too.


Yeah but maybe someone else might enjoy reading it,
Go for it:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/

If you haven't seen this site..
Please make sure you check out the concordance feature on this..
When you call up a verse and want to see the greek

Click the "c" button next to the verse on the RHS...the greek will come up.
Click the Strong's Number to bring up the definition..

Hours of fun..

fallensoul
09-09-2009, 10:03 PM
Gotta admire the creativity how you can dismiss everything factual and resort into pure beliefs and make that your reality.

Don't mind my little observation.

"It is easier to live with the lies that are your beliefs than with the truth that is reality." It makes things oh so much easier.

Some food for thought there hehe"

stfd
09-09-2009, 10:03 PM
Yeah but maybe someone else might enjoy reading it,
Go for it:
http://www.blueletterbible.org/

If you haven't seen this site..
Please make sure you check out the concordance feature on this..
When you call up a verse and want to see the greek

Click the "c" button next to the verse on the RHS...the greek will come up.
Click the Strong's Number to bring up the definition..

Hours of fun..


interesting, didnt know about this one.

And no offence but id rather wait and check the one i have at home.