Paul McCartney is dead.

[truthseeker49]

I live on the East Coast of the United States. I'm sure that there are other Brazilians out there. :D

[endlessvista]

sounds like a horrible totalitarian nihilistic nightmare to me..............he also sung (and probably his most spirited ever vocal!!!) GIVE ME MONEY ,THATS WHAT I WANT!!

john lennons solo career is just as lame as mc cartneys............mostly dirge and dross with the occaisional corker.........anyway lets deconstruct this "beautifull song"

Imagine there's no heaven . . . No hell below us . . . Imagine all the people living for today. Okay, let's imagine that;
let's imagine six billion people who believe that flesh and blood is all there is; that once you shuffle off this mortal coil, poof, you're history; that Hitler and Mother Teresa, for example, both met the same ultimate fate. Common sense suggests that such a world would produce a lot more Hitlers and a lot fewer Teresas, for the same reason that you get a lot more speeders / murderers / rapists / embezzlers when you eliminate laws, police, and punishment. Skeptics and atheists can say what they like about religion, but it's hard to deny that the fear of an afterlife where one will be judged has likely kept hundreds of millions from committing acts of aggression, if not outright horror. Nothing clears the conscience quite like a belief in eternal nothingness.

Imagine there's no countries . . . Nothing to kill or die for / No religion too / Imagine all the people / living life in peace. Hmmm. A single, borderless entity. No passports or customs inspectors rifling through your luggage. So far, so good. But wait a second. By what laws, rules, cultures, customs, and mores would we all be living? America's? Saudi Arabia's? Iceland's? Cuba's? Obviously, organizing billions of people from different traditions around a common mindset would require some serious coercion that progressives (many of whom will be out in force tonight with lighted candles) keep reminding us is not our prerogative--not even in countries with brutal dictators. And if there's nothing to kill or die for, then there's really nothing to live for, either--not equality, not liberty, not justice. It bears remembering that those young Englishmen who declared, in the 1930s, that they wouldn't fight for king and country did nothing for the cause of peace; quite the opposite. Lennon's own Oxford Pledge may warm the hearts of pacifists, but it's true music to a tyrant's ears.

Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can / No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man / Imagine all the people, sharing all the world. . . . Let's begin implementing the third stanza's message by splitting up the royalties to this copyrighted song. Mrs. Lennon, I imagine, will be only too happy to share with the rest of us the proceeds from the semiannual checks she receives for its licensing. In fact, why don't we all participate in every revenue stream created by John's invaluable catalogue? No, even that's not good enough. John wants us all to own everything, so we're each entitled to an equal share of not only his catalogue but also every album, tape, and CD ever made--by every artist. True, in such an egalitarian world, there soon won't be any record stores from which to take home recorded merchandise, since the owners will have nothing left to sell and are anyway no longer the owners (we all are). Nor will there be anything to play or record the music on (assuming any artist still wants to record), since there'd be no one to build the equipment. Why should anyone volunteer to work in a factory making hard goods when everyone else is living in the poshest houses and eating at the finest restaurants for free? Of course, housing and food are going to be problems, too, unless someone volunteers to mine the quarries, hammer nails, plant corn, and catch salmon for the rest of us. In John's imagined world, su casa es mi casa. So is su radicchio.

And the world will live as one. One what? Violent mess, apparently.

Imagine that.

he also may or may not have kicked to death a taxi driver in hamburg...................so karma did catch up with him. just not instantly .lol
oh and you guys still believe in Satan as a reality? lol
Talk about brainwashing of the masses :D

He was the one who may of also killed Stuart Suttcliff as well. He also beat the shit out of his first wife and joked about it. He was typical of the type who sits in the back of Rolls Royce preaching socialism. People could not make sense of the Working Class Hero living in a palace lecturing everyone else on how to behave. In the end Mark Chapman settled it with a bullet unfortunately.

John Lennon was a nasty piece of work - did not deserve to be murdered, but his sainthood is tottally unjustified.

[karol2020]

^ I think it's just a smear campaign to discredit John so that people won't see the truth & beauty in songs like "Imagine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEOkxRLzBf0

John Lennon
Imagine (1971)

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

http://www.mp3lyrics.org/j/john-lennon/imagine/

yes, this song i think is the best of them, with a pretty message..:) I´m sorry but everyone who see this song with a evil meaning or a nightmare world must be kidding and diverging totaly from the pure and simple meaning of it....

[endlessvista]

yes, this song i think is the best of them, with a pretty message..:) I´m sorry but everyone who see this song with a evil meaning or a nightmare world must be kidding and diverging totaly from the pure and simple meaning of it....

Lennon wrote he anthem for the NWO when you think about it.

[karol2020]

Lennon wrote he anthem for the NWO when you think about it.


anthem for the NWO? could be, if you rationalize it.... but in the simple meaning, as i see, describes a world where everyone doesnt have reason or escuses to fight or arguing because all the things that cause it- like religions, country divisions and wathever doent exist... so its a song so easy of being understood but when we rationalize it and find other meanings we damage it...

[truthseeker49]

Endlessvista wrote:
He was the one who may of also killed Stuart Suttcliff as well. He also beat the shit out of his first wife and joked about it. He was typical of the type who sits in the back of Rolls Royce preaching socialism. People could not make sense of the Working Class Hero living in a palace lecturing everyone else on how to behave. In the end Mark Chapman settled it with a bullet unfortunately.

John Lennon was a nasty piece of work - did not deserve to be murdered, but his sainthood is tottally unjustified.

There isn't much I can say to this. He happens to be right on every count. The thing is, John was fucked over most of his life. I know that is not a good excuse for his behaviour, but it is a fact. His mom screwed with his head in every way possible. He was made to believe that his dad didn't want to have anything to do with him when nothing could be further from the truth. When his mom was killed, he was taken in by his Aunt Mimi. Mimi was childless, and was a rather cold individual. John grew up to be a very angry young man. I think if he had gotten psychological help when he was young, his life might've turned out very differently.

[truthseeker49]

As far as Imagine being the anthem for the NWO, that does make sense. And it doesn't necessarily reflect badly on John. John was being controlled by that witch for years before he wrote that song. :(

[faulconandsnowjob]

He was the one who may of (sic) also killed Stuart Suttcliff as well.
John killed Stuart Sutcliffe? Right. There is no support for that whatsoever. It's disinfo to discredit him, imo.

And as far as "Imagine" being what TPTB want... I don't think so. You guys should really read the lyrics. He's imagining a world w/out religion, nationalism, & materialism to control people. One where there's a "brotherhood of man," sharing the world peacefully. It's a beautiful song w/ a beautiful message. That is not a world TPTB have conditioned us into wanting. If people weren't greedy, how would they make money off of us, for ex? I don't think John was controllable, & that's why he got taken out.

[orbandsceptre27]

Lennon wrote he anthem for the NWO when you think about it.


Can you expand on that?

[faulconandsnowjob]

Lennon wrote he anthem for the NWO when you think about it.
Except he returned his MBE, he was hounded by the FBI, & finally assassinated, most likely by the CIA. He was def not playing their game.

[orbandsceptre27]

Except he returned his MBE....

"If it`s a choice between the British Army and the IRA, then I`m with the IRA" - John Lennon, August 1971.

http://lonesomesparrow.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/john-lennon-and-the-ira/

http://www.fantompowa.net/Flame/john_lennon_irish_roots.htm

Hmm...... don`t see a pretext of the NWO here!

[faulconandsnowjob]

From The Luck Of The Irish (Lennon-Ono):

Why the hell are the English there anyway?
As they kill with god on their side!
Blame it all on the kids and the IRA!
As the bastards commit genocide

http://www.fantompowa.net/Flame/john_lennon_irish_roots.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpgataezz8M

I'm sure her majesty was not amused :-P

[orbandsceptre27]

^ I agree with Icke and other spiritual teachers when they say we are all one/infinite consciousness. This idea of nationhood is a load of balony used to divide people and set us against each other........... Irish, Englsh, French, American, Spanish what does it matter?

There seems to be alot of doom and gloom at times on this forum regarding the Illuminati - They`re portrayed as this great, unseen and impenetrable body which controls and rules all. One important lesson I`ve learned from being Irish in this lifetime, is to never accept defeat on any level. The game is never over until it`s over, and nobody has any right to mould or shape your life.

One young man that springs to mind as someone who constantly worked against almost overwhelming odds, yet consistantly came out on top was a chap from west Cork named Michael Collins. He only lived to be 31, but in his short life he succeeded in becoming a major thorn in the side of British Intelligence, and one of the principal agitators for a free Ireland. It doesn`t matter what country you`re from, this was somebody who literally invented his own rules. Almost singlehandedly he continually cracked British Intelligence during the War of Independence, and to this day he`s studied by the CIA. When you think there`s no hope then read this mans story, or watch the film "Michael Collins" which was released in 1996.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Michael Collins is one of my heroes! <333

[truthseeker49]

He sounds like a hero to me. I hate to change the subject ( as this thread has taken an interesting turn), but I want to post this photo.
A young man on my forum just posted this. I think that it's incredible:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/floplamb.jpg
He wrote underneath:
Clean shot of ear fully popping off in 1973

This kid has eyes like a hawk ! I am so lucky to have him on my forum !

For comparison - Paul:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/prettyboyaa.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/beauty2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/floplamb.jpgFaul

Faul's natural ear taken during filming of MMT, 1967:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Magical7.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Magical6.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

I hate to change the subject
This thread is about PAUL, so if you talk about Paul (or Faul), you're not changing the subject :) <333

Faul has detachable ears. I wonder what else is detachable - lol :D Click here to find out ;-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-AnLyIGDMA

[truthseeker49]

Faulcon - that's HILARIOUS!!! :D

[orbandsceptre27]

Faul has detachable ears. I wonder what else is detachable - lol :D Click here to find out ;-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-AnLyIGDMA

Well just when you think you`ve heard and seen it all ehh...... Faulette....Faula maybe?? :D

Faul http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/posinginwhite.jpg

[orbandsceptre27]

A young man on my forum just posted this. I think that it's incredible:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/floplamb.jpg
He wrote underneath:

Clean shot of ear fully popping off in 1973


It`s a great shot Truthseeker - the false ear is clearly visible! :cool:

[evea]

It`s a great shot Truthseeker - the false ear is clearly visible! :cool:


sooooooooooooooo your saying the camera never lies
mmmmmmmmmmmmm:)

anyway hes playing coachella in the summer
wonder if owt will drop off

[orbandsceptre27]

anyway hes playing coachella in the summer
wonder if owt will drop off

I doubt he wears the "mr. potato head" ears anymore lol.

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/f_fauxpaulmccm_1473996.jpg
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/f_fauxpaulmccm_307f62f.jpg

Billys fake ears!

[krakhead]

Fake ears? Not a curl of hair then? :confused:

"What the thinker thinks, the prover proves"

You really are willing to alter your perception of reality to a great degree in order to back up your 'Faul' theories aren't you?

[orbandsceptre27]

^ Well..... theres two pictures of a man wearing a false ear, what would you advise? ;)

And if you`re going to say that the photo may have been been tampered with......the question would then be, who would do this, and why??

[krakhead]

^ Well..... theres two pictures of a man wearing a false ear, what would you advise? ;)

And if you`re going to say that the photo may have been been tampered with......the question would then be, who would do this, and why??

No, there are pictures of a man with a curl of sideburn sticking out making it possibly look as if he has a fake ear.

I was in no way going to suggest the picture had been tampered with. Just your perceptions.... ;)

:D

[orbandsceptre27]

I was in no way going to suggest the picture had been tampered with. Just your perceptions....



Well I guess I`m fortunate to have a good memory Krackers -

Well they are photo's of his right and left ears respectively - got 2 photo's of the same ear?

Not 100% proof now by any means, but this photo looks altered to me.


Lets just say you have a history my friend, and as we say over this direction..... "an elephant never forgets." :D

[krakhead]

What does any of that have to do with a curl of hair in the photo's you presented as evidence for this current theory of yours? (the false ear one)

And I have 'a history' do I? You make it sound so sordid! Do you mean a history of not believing the Faul theory? In which case - guilty a charged!

Elephants can't fit in my bath either - does that make a difference?

[orbandsceptre27]

And I have 'a history' do I? You make it sound so sordid!

Now now........ truth is truth! (and a theory is a theory)

[howie]

The photo has not been altered, it comes from a video clip. Slowing it down frame by frame shows clearly it's his 'ear' & not a curl of hair.

[krakhead]

Link please?

[orbandsceptre27]

The photo has not been altered, it comes from a video clip. Slowing it down frame by frame shows clearly it's his 'ear' & not a curl of hair.

Excellent point - the man here has it in one!

[orbandsceptre27]

I was in no way going to suggest the picture had been tampered with.


^ Now he wants a link...... after already saying the picture wasn`t tampered with :D WTF??

Would you like someone to make you a cup of tea while we`re at it?

If you can`t see a false ear from this video shot (when so many more have) then head for Specsavers!

[evea]

so paul is dead and somebody with prosthetic ears has been masquerading as him
you know you could have a point here
coz since the sixties his musics been shite ;)

[karol2020]

The photo has not been altered, it comes from a video clip. Slowing it down frame by frame shows clearly it's his 'ear' & not a curl of hair.

I want the link too, please... it´s better to confirm in a video.

[astrochicken]

so paul is dead and somebody with prosthetic ears has been masquerading as him
you know you could have a point here
coz since the sixties his musics been shite ;)


lol

[howie]

Starting at 1:11

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kYHv0uwMY5c

[krakhead]

Oh, there we are then, watched in full screen, HQ.

Quite obviously hair. :)

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/posinginwhite.jpg

Re: Faul's detachable penis, this reminds me of a skit w/ Eddie Murphy on SNL w/ a Michael Jackson doll, which was supposed to be "anatomically correct." EM pulled the pants down, showed it to the crowd, & said, "Aha! Just as I suspected!"

Re: Faul's Mr. Potato Head ears, here are some pics:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Faullamb2.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaZ9s7S26qg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/BillEarKintyre.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvGWm4N-WGU

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/floplamb.jpg

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g134/antiKitano/PDVD_003.jpg
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g134/antiKitano/PDVD_005.jpg
http://blog.makezine.com/284855868_daef7bc8e2.jpg

But even if Faul's ears looked exactly like Paul's, there is still the problem of his face not looking the same.

[faulconandsnowjob]

So paul is dead and somebody with prosthetic ears has been masquerading as him
you know you could have a point here
coz since the sixties his musics been shite
That is so true.

[truthseeker49]

Another comparison just made by a member of my forum:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/jpmfinalrecord.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I love that comp! The difference in the noses is quite evident.

[truthseeker49]

There's noway that anyone would think that's the same person. Especially if you didn't put a name to the photos. Paul, 1966 vs. Faul 1967.
Faul's left ear is noticeably higher up on his head than Paul's ear was.

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Some people do see them as the same b/c they've been trained to see them as the same. It freaks me out a little :eek:

[truthseeker49]

It freaks me out more than just a little. I have been arguing these points with people on PID/PWR forums since 2003 !

[coco]

Except he returned his MBE, he was hounded by the FBI, & finally assassinated, most likely by the CIA. He was def not playing their game.

Oddly enough, I can believe that. Didn't he have to 'fight' to gain entrance into the US post Beatles? (If memory serves).

The thing that sticks in my mind is he pretty much calmed down and settles into domestic life. What threat there? Then again, I'm not CIA so I don't think like those guys.

[coco]

Paul & his father v. Faul & Paul's father

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/jim_mccartney_comparison/james_paul_mccartney_and_jim.jpghttp://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/jim_mccartney_comparison/bill_and_jim_pauls_dad.jpg

On this note I will, with respect, state that the older ya get the faster ya go downhill. Five years alone can make for a significant difference in an elderly person's appearance, including height.

We do not know the elder McCartney's health situation, the state of his bones, etc.

With respect, I will dismiss the photo as proof that Paul/Faul is a fake.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Didn't he [John] have to 'fight' to gain entrance into the US post Beatles? (If memory serves).
Oh, big time. He had to fight to not be deported from USA (they wanted to live in NY). The FBI also hounded him. He knew he was being bugged (he said that on the Dick Cavett Show, right?) Anyway, he basically dropped out in the mid to late 70's.

The thing that sticks in my mind is he pretty much calmed down and settles into domestic life. What threat there? Then again, I'm not CIA so I don;t think like those guys.
John was making a come back in 1980. He just had a new record out (Double Fantasy), & maybe some people were getting nervous he'd start causing problems again, or perhaps, spill the beans about something...? Anyway, it was the new era of Reagan/Bush, & Bush senior had been the head of the CIA prior to being vice president. Reagan narrowly missed being assassinated in March 1981.

[faulconandsnowjob]

With respect, I will dismiss the photo as proof that Paul/Faul is a fake.
Maybe an elderly person will lose an inch or 2 of height b/c of stooping or whatever, but I have never heard of anyone shrinking 5 inches. But regardless, look at the faces of Paul & Faul - not the same lad.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Truthseeker, don't you sometimes feel like the guy in "They Live," where you're the only one who can see the Reptilians? Well, at least there are a lot more people who can see it now than back when you started. :)

[orbandsceptre27]

Starting at 1:11

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kYHv0uwMY5c

Fair play Howie - The false ear is very obvious, if you freeze the vid at 1.24 where Faul tilts his head to the right!

How did he get away with that ear job? - Looks like it`s about to hang off!

[humito]

YAWN..this thread is repeating itself endlessly and going round in circles as always:rolleyes:

[faulconandsnowjob]

How did he get away with that ear job?
Hardly anyone even notices that he has a different face (& talent), so you're really expecting too much if you think they'll notice his ears :D lol

[orbandsceptre27]

YAWN..this thread is repeating itself endlessly and going round in circles as always:rolleyes:

Yes....... and you still don`t get it!

Anyway aren`t you the guy who wrote that Imagine........ "sounds like a horrible totalitarian nihilistic nightmare."

[faulconandsnowjob]

Somebody actually just posted this on Nothing Is Real:

they are always using picture were he looks different to prove a point.. why not use pictures where he resembles "himself"??



Ok, I think that's hilarious. Yeah, I'm really sorry that Faul doesn't look more like Paul. :D (actually, I really am, b/c Paul was hawt! :D)

[truthseeker49]

Faulcon, that really is hilarious ! Here's another gem from one of the more prolific members of my forum:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/ExposedTeeth.jpg

Check out Paul's teeth vs. Faul's teeth. Paul's mouth is actually shaped differently because the left side of his mouth seems to dent in. Faul's teeth do not.
BTW, that photo of Paul is from the movie Help !, 1965.

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ See, there you go again using comps where Faul doesn't really resemble Paul :-P

[evea]

Faulcon, that really is hilarious ! Here's another gem from one of the more prolific members of my forum:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/ExposedTeeth.jpg

Check out Paul's teeth vs. Faul's teeth. Paul's mouth is actually shaped differently because the left side of his mouth seems to dent in. Faul's teeth do not.
BTW, that photo of Paul is from the movie Help !, 1965.


pauls mouth is differently shaped because he is mouthing a different word

say the vowels in front of a mirror
note how your mouth changes shape:)
and his teeth are the same in both!


i have pictures of me taken minutes apart in which due to different positioning , light camera angle... i dont look exactly the same no-one does!

although i made a flippant comment about his later music maybe his music wasnt as good because he no longer had john lennons influence


but really what swings it for me
if he was bumped off and replaced with a lookalike....... why did this lookalike need to wear false ears?

[accuracy]

It's still a hot topic.:D

Keep up the good work:

faulconandsnowjob, orbandsceptre27, truthseeker49 !

You're blood is worth bottling.

:D;)

accuracy

[truthseeker49]

Faulcon wrote:
^ See, there you go again using comps where Faul doesn't really resemble Paul :-P

Yeah, I know. Faul's eyes are closer together. < sticks out tongue >

Evea, it has nothing to do with the words Paul is singing. It might take me awhile, but I will come up with other photos of Paul singing vs. Faul singing.

How can anyone think this is the same man ?
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/WA889901.jpghttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/PaulMcCartney7521.jpg

[truthseeker49]

Accuracy, long time no see ! You should come around more often. Thank you so much for the accolades. We do try very hard to get our message across. < takes a bow >

Goofy faced:
Paul http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/goofy.jpghttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Faulfunnyface.jpg Faul

For Evea:
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/2007-11-16T04_58_43-08_00.jpghttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Billsigpgm4.jpg

There will be more coming...

[truthseeker49]

Evea wrote:
if he was bumped off and replaced with a lookalike....... why did this lookalike need to wear false ears?

Are you serious ? So that the lookalike would better resemble Paul, why else ?
:rolleyes:

Paul vs. Faul, 1967
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/Paulcolor.jpghttp://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/bill4.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Magical7.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Magical5.jpg Faul's original ears.


Faul's ears look very different from Paul's.

[truthseeker49]

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/Copyofbigbrowneyes2.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/67clndr.jpgFaul,1967
In the above 1967 photo ( the person sitting ), Faul's cleft is crooked. I wonder why the photographer didn't say anything ? The photo next to it is Paul.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul4MMT.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Magical4.jpg
Faul,1967,MMT (no cleft)
Ahhhh, the mystery of the appearing & disappearing cleft ! In the photo on the right, Faul's face appears all kinds of swollen. I wonder why ? < wink >

Little Paul vs. Big Faul:

Paul http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/florida2.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/Florida0.jpg
Faul http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Billinbathingsuittheone.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulindoorwayshirtless.jpg

Paul has a smaller head & frame.

I wish that I could understand why so many people are resistant to this idea. There are many "Celebrity Impersonators " out there. Many of them look so much like the original , you would NOT be able to tell them apart. As "Celebrity Impersonators " go, Faul is good, but I'm sure that there are much better ones out there. < shrugs >

[evea]

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/Copyofbigbrowneyes2.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/67clndr.jpgFaul,1967
In the above 1967 photo ( the person sitting ), Faul's cleft is crooked. I wonder why the photographer didn't say anything ? The photo next to it is Paul.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul4MMT.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Magical4.jpg
Faul,1967,MMT (no cleft)
Ahhhh, the mystery of the appearing & disappearing cleft ! In the photo on the right, Faul's face appears all kinds of swollen. I wonder why ? < wink >

pmsl this is madness
the cleft is wonky in second pic as his head is slightly at angle

3rd photo his facial muscles when smiling pull skin on chin tighter
and its there in the fourth just the lighting makes in not as prominent

but hey i think this is brilliant


who is this faul anyway
surely he had a life before

is there no reports in u.s in mid sixties saying my lookalike son has gone missing

and if he was some cia agent who agreed to this faux life and had surgery to look like him

a) why didnt they sort his lugs out
b) was he not mighty peed off at having to get hitched up
with linda and her goddam awful ready meals

[truthseeker49]

Paul http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%203/82202321.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/milkBill197071.jpg Faul

DAMN, look at the size of Faul's forehead compared to Paul's ! Hey Faul, GOT MILK ???

[truthseeker49]

Evea, you haven't explained why there IS NO CLEFT in the other two photos from 1967.
Wait, I'm wrong. You did explain it.

Evea wrote:
3rd photo his facial muscles when smiling pull skin on chin tighter
and its there in the fourth just the lighting makes in not as prominent

I can tell you that I have seen photos of other celebrities with clefts in their chins. They have that cleft in every photo, no matter what their facial expression. Paul does have a shallow cleft, so I can see that it might not be as apparent. However, it is visible.

Paul's head is tilted slightly in the comparison photo & his cleft is perfectly centered. Try again. < rolls eyes >

[evea]

i did say
pic 3 he is smiling so facial muscles pull up tightening skin on chin
and it is there in the fourth just lighting makes it less prominent

[evea]

oh and its also in the black and white one just above

[evea]

can i just add forhead looks wass in one due to foreshortening of the lower face because of camera angle

[evea]

there alot of clefts talking on here :D

[truthseeker49]

You can say what you like it's a free country. That does not explain the many, many photos that I have of Faul with a much larger forehead than Paul no matter what angle the photo was taken at.

Paulhttp://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/1963-10-0914GreenStLondon.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/dressednice.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/pid_on_magazine_p.jpgFaul,1967

[evea]

arr no dont be offended by my last comment
i just get a bit naughty sometimes:o

your entitled to believe what you believe
just i dont believe that hes faul:)


completely going off topic here
but paul when young kind of reminds me of pete docherty

[truthseeker49]

More tooth comparisons:

Paul http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Paulteeth.jpg
Faul http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_teeth.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/pid_on_magazine_p66.jpg

Faul http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_teeth.jpg http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/james_paul_mccartney_bn.jpg Paul


I try not to take it personally. I have been doing this since 2003, so it can get to be a bit much sometimes. :(

[evea]

what got you started on this .........did you read it somewhere or discover it yourself

are you a big beatles fan

[faulconandsnowjob]

accuracy, good to see you around. Thanks for that comment :)

truthseeker, you've been busy posting all sorts of awesome comps. Good job! :) Honestly, I have no idea why some people can't tell those 2 guys apart. It must be that they've been trained to see them as being the same. As we've discussed before, people w/ unbiased eyes think it's ridiculous to think they're the same. But to some people, it matters not if Paul was shorter, cuter, more talented, had difft colored eyes, etc. :rolleyes: All I'm going to say is that some people need to break free of their programming.

Same guy? Really? LOLOL! :D

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/faul_paul_eye_distance_comparison.jpg

[truthseeker49]

Evea wrote:
what got you started on this .........did you read it somewhere or discover it yourself

are you a big beatles fan

I used to belong to a paranormal message board in the summer of 2003. The admin there was link crazy. He would send everyone 20 different links every day. One day, he sent me a link to this website about Paul McCartney being dead. I used to be a big Paul fan when I was a kid, so I checked it out.
I don't think that I ever went back to that message board after that. :D

Thanks, Faulcon. It is alot of work, as you know. Some people can't help that they can't see it right away. I saw it immediately but I had the opposite reaction. I thought that Paul was the imposter & Faul was the original. I had been raised with Sir Paul as Paul McCartney. It TOTALLY freaked me out when I saw the original photo comparisons. Once I saw the difference, I couldn't see it any other way. < shrug >

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I know they can't help it, but I do get tired of those who can't see the difference insulting those of us who can. It just gets old.

So, you know this pic?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/faul_paul_eye_distance_comparison.jpg

One of the PIA'ers on NIR said Faul's face got stretched. LOL! Of course, we know it's Paul's face that gets stretched & is o/wise tampered w/.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/compare.jpg

[orbandsceptre27]

It's still a hot topic.:D

Keep up the good work:

faulconandsnowjob, orbandsceptre27, truthseeker49 !

You're blood is worth bottling.

:D;)

accuracy

Accuracy you old dog, little did you realise when you started this thread you`d be creating a monster! ;) :D

Thanks for your kind words - Have read most of A. Constantines "Covert War Against Rock," a great read.

Chat you later!

[accuracy]

Evea, you haven't explained why there IS NO CLEFT in the other two photos from 1967.
Wait, I'm wrong. You did explain it.

Evea wrote:
3rd photo his facial muscles when smiling pull skin on chin tighter
and its there in the fourth just the lighting makes in not as prominent

I can tell you that I have seen photos of other celebrities with clefts in their chins. They have that cleft in every photo, no matter what their facial expression. Paul does have a shallow cleft, so I can see that it might not be as apparent. However, it is visible.

Paul's head is tilted slightly in the comparison photo & his cleft is perfectly centered. Try again. < rolls eyes >



This could be a comedy thread too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D:D

[accuracy]

Accuracy you old dog, little did you realise when you started this thread you`d be creating a monster! ;) :D

Thanks for your kind words - Have read most of A. Constantines "Covert War Against Rock," a great read.

Chat you later!

A great book indeed.;)

[accuracy]

^ I know they can't help it, but I do get tired of those who can't see the difference insulting those of us who can. It just gets old.

So, you know this pic?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/faul_paul_eye_distance_comparison.jpg

One of the PIA'ers on NIR said Faul's face got stretched. LOL! Of course, we know it's Paul's face that gets stretched & is o/wise tampered w/.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/compare.jpg

:rolleyes: There will always going to be a blatant denier/s in this thread as these pictures expose the truth. :rolleyes:

They have an a "agenda" to fulfil.

[accuracy]

what got you started on this .........did you read it somewhere or discover it yourself

are you a big beatles fan


Haaahaaahaaaa, what a classic.
:D

[truthseeker49]

Accuracy, check this out. A young man on my forum has been bitten by the "PID bug ". He made this comparsion to show us how badly photos have been tampered with ALL ALONG:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/letibereal.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/letibefake.jpg

The second album cover is the one that you get from the store. If you don't believe me, just google, image, Let it Be album Cover. It will come up right away. In the 1st Let it Be album cover, he substituted an actual photo of Faul from that time period.
The photo of "Paul" in the second photo is obviously a "composite" of both Paul & Faul. It does not look like Faul from that time period.
Check out the foreheads. In the composite, it's noticeably smaller than in the original photo.
Here are some photos of Faul from that time period:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/paulroof.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Macca197071.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/letitbe2.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/letitbeguitar.jpg

[truthseeker49]

Below is a vintage magazine cover of Paul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Beatle_Paul_cover.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/letitbeguitar.jpg Faul,1970
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Macca197071.jpghttp://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/lilis678/DB1005_BEATLES_6.jpg
^ Faul, 1970 vs. Paul, 1964 (?)
Below, more vintage photos of Paul
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Beatle_Paul_1.jpghttp://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Beatle_Paul_story1.jpg

I purchased the magazine that I got the above three photos from off of E-Bay.

[orbandsceptre27]

Truthseeker your photo posts yesterday and today have been terrific! :cool: Just looking at the "Let it Be" photos, even with the beard this man looks nothing like McCartney - Much bigger head among many things.... that beard is hiding nothing.

I`ve heard it said more than a few times that Bill is roughly four years older than Paul - He certainly looks it in all shots I`ve viewed of him!

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/letibefake.jpg

The pictures look like they've been compressed from top to bottom to me. At least, the pics of George & "Paul" do.

[truthseeker49]

I wanted to edit one of the above posts, but it won't let me. I just wanted to clarify that I purchased that vintage magazine years ago, within the 1st 2 years of my interest in PID.

Orb wrote:
Just looking at the "Let it Be" photos, even with the beard this man looks nothing like McCartney - Much bigger head among many things.... that beard is hiding nothing.

Those are my sentiments exactly !

Faulcon, you're right about those photos being compressed. I guess they felt that it would cause "plausible deniability " concerning any differences between "Paul" pre & post September 1966.

[astrochicken]

It's so fucking sad.


I am now going to put on some early beatles and play them full fucking blast.

[truthseeker49]

Astro, sometimes I have to do that to connect to them. I am unable to listen to anything post Revolver. I know that either it's not Paul singing, or it's pre-recorded vocals that they have tweaked to fit their needs. It makes me so sad, so angry...:mad:

[astrochicken]

Astro, sometimes I have to do that to connect to them. I am unable to listen to anything post Revolver. I know that either it's not Paul singing, or it's pre-recorded vocals that they have tweaked to fit their needs. It makes me so sad, so angry...:mad:

The strange, well not really now that i know about paul/faul, but i allways loved and only listened to the early stuff up till revolver and maybe 3 songs off of sgt peppers (definetly paul's vocals being used despite his being dead) but all the latter-day piano dirges.. urggghghh.

[truthseeker49]

Me too. When I was a kid I instinctively knew that something was wrong. When "he" married Linda I was devastated. I lost interest in him in the early 1970's. It wasn't until I found out about PID on the internet that I realized that the reason I lost interest was because he wasn't really Paul.:(

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I always wondered why "Paul" suddenly lost his looks after 1966. lol Oh, he didn't seem as cool, either, & the song-writing also seemed to change in a way I wasn't really into.

[bribean]

This whole PID busines is such a waste of time. Whats the point?
The photos prove nothing because you are comparing images taken in different lighting conditions, from different angles and with different facial muscles being used. Not to mention the fact that photos are often streached, touched up and otherwise manipulated by the people publishing them for composition purposes.
People also change slightly as they age and their experiences show in their bodies and faces.
I suspect that you prefered the pre-Sgt Peppers music to the much more evolved and mature music they produced after '66, and you find it hard to comprehend the leap without reverting to such way out theories.
The Beatles did mess about with in-jokes and double meanings in their music cos they had massive talent and a great sense of humour. I doubt that they intended that people take it this far.
Don't you think that some definitive proof would be out by now, considering friends and family would all have to be in on it.
Again I ask.....WHAT IS THE POINT?

[faulconandsnowjob]

This whole PID busines is such a waste of time. Whats the point?
The point is that people have been lied to for over 40 yrs. It's important to see the control the media has over the public consciousness & awareness. People have been, basically, brainwashed to such a point that they literally cannot see the difference between 2 different men.

If it's a waste of time, why are you here?

The photos prove nothing because you are comparing images taken in different lighting conditions, from different angles and with different facial muscles being used.
Of course, they prove something. They are evidence to show that there are 2 different men who look different. There are many pictures taken from the same angle. People don't look so drastically difft, normally. And anyway, it's not just photos, but also videos & interviews that show there are difft "Pauls" involved.

Not to mention the fact that photos are often streached, touched up and otherwise manipulated by the people publishing them for composition purposes.
Well, that's true. Photos have def been tampered w/ to make the 2 men appear more alike.

People also change slightly as they age and their experiences show in their bodies and faces.
That is one argument that keeps coming up that needs to be put to rest. We are talking about a drastic difference from Aug 1966 to Dec 1966. For ex:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/1966_comp.jpg

I suspect that you prefered the pre-Sgt Peppers music to the much more evolved and mature music they produced after '66, and you find it hard to comprehend the leap without reverting to such way out theories.
Oh, that's funny. I happen to be quite a fan of classical music, esp Mozart & Beethoven. I think I have an ear for "evolved and mature music." I prefer Paul's songs b/c they were better. Faul has never been able to pull of a "Yesterday" or an "Eleanor Rigby."

The Beatles did mess about with in-jokes and double meanings in their music cos they had massive talent and a great sense of humour. I doubt that they intended that people take it this far.
The Beatles always openly denied that they ever put any meaning in their songs, esp w/ respect to PID. There are way too many dark references to death for it to be a "joke." That's kind of sick humor, & I don't think the Beatles were sick like that.

Don't you think that some definitive proof would be out by now,
There is definitive proof. What do you think all the photos & videos are? You've just been trained to see Faul as Paul. Break free of your programming, & the difference is obvious.

considering friends and family would all have to be in on it.
Well, yeah, of course, they were "in on it," in that they knew something had happened to him. Don't you know anything about the Illuminati & their ways? It's really surprising that people on the D. Icke forum don't realize that people get murdered who step out of line or reveal information that TPTB don't want out. A little research, maybe?

Again I ask.....WHAT IS THE POINT?
The point is to see how much you've been programmed. If you don't know you're controlled, how can you free yourself from it? Free your mind.

[astrochicken]

This whole PID busines is such a waste of time. Whats the point?
.....
.....
Again I ask.....WHAT IS THE POINT?



The point is that people have been lied to for over 40 yrs....
........
........
The point is to see how much you've been programmed. If you don't know you're controlled, how can you free yourself from it? Free your mind.

yeah, yet another comes crashing in....


@Bribean: Free your mind.. it's staring you in the face.

@Faulcon: I salute your indefatigibility.. to be honest i don't know where you get the patience.

[bribean]

Thanks for the reply falcon, and I do understand that you take this seriously.
I have looked at a lot of the evidence on you tube and on this thread, but I don't see an obvious difference to be honest.
I love the Beatles and that is why I have paid attention to this.
OK, I do understand very well how we are manipulated by TPTB through the media and even through popular music etc. I just don't see why so much effort would have gone into an operation like this. What was there to gain from it?
The Beatles seemed to be putting out a much more spiritual and even very anti-establishment message in their music after 66, especially from John and George.
Paul seems to have been the least spiritual member throughout from what I can tell.
It doesn't add up to me.
You mention that they are on record as saying there were no hidden messages in their art, but that is not true. John admits to levels of meaning throughout their music.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky4tey8PJmw&eurl=http://www.davidicke.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=30&Itemid=48&feature=player_embedded
What about the obvious joke message at the end of Sgt Peppers for a start.
I do admit that some of the stuff on you tube was creepy, but it was far from concrete proof. A case of wanting to see things that were just not there most of the time.
The thing that bugs me is that The Beatles' output after Pauls so called death was of far more weight spiritually, so if what you say is true then the plan failed miserably for the elite.
This is a good thing surely?
This whole subject seems to be very nagative, and has no real relevance to the agenda as far as I can see.
Surely there would be much more positivity in celebrating the real message of love and peace the Beatles put into the public arena, instead of casting doubt upon that message.
I for one need much better proof than this if I am to take it on board.

[evea]

Thanks for the reply falcon, and I do understand that you take this seriously.
I have looked at a lot of the evidence on you tube and on this thread, but I don't see an obvious difference to be honest.
I love the Beatles and that is why I have paid attention to this.
OK, I do understand very well how we are manipulated by TPTB through the media and even through popular music etc. I just don't see why so much effort would have gone into an operation like this. What was there to gain from it?
The Beatles seemed to be putting out a much more spiritual and even very anti-establishment message in their music after 66, especially from John and George.
Paul seems to have been the least spiritual member throughout from what I can tell.
It doesn't add up to me.
You mention that they are on record as saying there were no hidden messages in their art, but that is not true. John admits to levels of meaning throughout their music.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky4tey8PJmw&eurl=http://www.davidicke.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=30&Itemid=48&feature=player_embedded
What about the obvious joke message at the end of Sgt Peppers for a start.
I do admit that some of the stuff on you tube was creepy, but it was far from concrete proof. A case of wanting to see things that were just not there most of the time.
The thing that bugs me is that The Beatles' output after Pauls so called death was of far more weight spiritually, so if what you say is true then the plan failed miserably for the elite.
This is a good thing surely?
This whole subject seems to be very nagative, and has no real relevance to the agenda as far as I can see.
Surely there would be much more positivity in celebrating the real message of love and peace the Beatles put into the public arena, instead of casting doubt upon that message.
I for one need much better proof than this if I am to take it on board.


totally agree with you mate
but i really wouldnt bother argueing the point with them
they will just start throwing childish insults
and saying you have a closed mind

i came on here to see what it was about and should they have shown me anything which made me think there could be something in this . i would have believed it
however nothing did . i even checked the net . nowt doing there either

im even still prepared to accept this if anything shows up which makes me suspicious
so you could say im 99.5 % sure hes not dead
they however are 100% sure hes dead

so not sure how im the one with the closed mind:)

but hey im sure they are nice people....... i just cant understand that if they believe there case is so watertight they dont take it further than sitting banging there keyboards

[faulconandsnowjob]

they will just start throwing childish insults
That's funny. In my experience, it's the PIA'ers who are incredibly rude & say we're "stupid" or "delusional" b/c we see something they cannot. I think they just don't like having their programming challenged. :D

and saying you have a closed mind
Closed or programmed :D


I have looked at a lot of the evidence on you tube and on this thread, but I don't see an obvious difference to be honest.
It took me a little bit of time comparing pics & video before it clicked for me. The difference between the 2 men is really obvious to me now, & I could never see them the same again.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/compare66.jpg

Some people think the fake ears are the smoking gun, but for me, it's the different color eyes:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/PaulBill20years.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/blueeyes3.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/faul_paul_eye_distance_comparison.jpg

I love the Beatles and that is why I have paid attention to this.
Same here.

OK, I do understand very well how we are manipulated by TPTB through the media and even through popular music etc.
Good. Then you're a giant leap ahead of the avg Joe :)

I just don't see why so much effort would have gone into an operation like this. What was there to gain from it?
Well, we can't know for sure what was going on behind the scenes. I strongly suspect it had to do w/ the drug agenda. I'm sure you know TPTB were bringing LSD in as a mind-control drug? Maybe they wanted to control the anti-war movement w/ it or just conduct some sort of social experiment w/ it? Who knows. I can only imagine that Paul would not "get w/ the program" & was eliminated. Since he was popular, he was replaced w/ a person who was amenable to doing what TPTB wanted - & use Paul's popularity to influence people. Not too long after Faul was installed, he came out talking about how he'd taken LSD. Oh, great. If the Beatles are doing LSD, it must be really cool, right? Well, maybe it actually turned out to be a good thing b/c John later said that TPTB were trying to control people, but actually ended up setting them free.

The Beatles seemed to be putting out a much more spiritual and even very anti-establishment message in their music after 66, especially from John and George.
Yes, that's completely in line w/ losing someone close to you. I know I suffered a personal loss that put me on a more spiritual path.

Paul seems to have been the least spiritual member throughout from what I can tell.
Not in my opinion. He was only 24 when he (most likely) died. He'd already written very deep songs like "Eleanor Rigby" & "Yesterday."

You mention that they are on record as saying there were no hidden messages in their art, but that is not true. John admits to levels of meaning throughout their music.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky4te...layer_embedded
Well, John said difft things about that then. He def denied putting any PID clues in songs, but there they are. He/they prob couldn't say anything openly about what happened.

I do admit that some of the stuff on you tube was creepy, but it was far from concrete proof. A case of wanting to see things that were just not there most of the time.
Nobody wants to see that anything bad happened to Paul. It was very upsetting for me when I realized he had been replaced.

The thing that bugs me is that The Beatles' output after Pauls so called death was of far more weight spiritually, so if what you say is true then the plan failed miserably for the elite.
Maybe the plan didn't work out for the elite like they had hoped. But, they have managed to convince most people that Paul today is the same as ever, & that's just not the case.

This whole subject seems to be very nagative, and has no real relevance to the agenda as far as I can see.
Negative? No. We're just trying to shed light on TPTB tactics - how they use celebrity & the media to influence & control people. I'm pretty sure Paul was not the only victim. His case is one of the better known & researched ones, tho.

Surely there would be much more positivity in celebrating the real message of love and peace the Beatles put into the public arena, instead of casting doubt upon that message.
I'm not trying to cast doubt on that. I hate that some people start talking about the Beatles having been "Satanists" or whatever. I think those people are really missing the Illuminati/intelligence connection, personally.

I for one need much better proof than this if I am to take it on board.
Well, that's fine. There are tons of photo comps here, plus other info

http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1

[faulconandsnowjob]

Faulcon: I salute your indefatigibility.. to be honest i don't know where you get the patience.

Thanks, Astro. I don't either. I just think it's important for this information to come out. :) Being able to open some eyes makes it all worth it. :)

[karol2020]

Have anyone ever thought of the possiblity that Paul didint died, but is a mind controled person- that period of his possibly death he could have been through a mind control program? (what can explain the changes in his personality)... is a possibilty that i was thinking about....

this could explain that cia murder lennon and with paul, to dont be so obvious, they mind controled him....

[truthseeker49]

Astro, so do I. I don't know where we would be without Faulcon. She has taken the place of my friend Kary who for years was Paul's champion. I would not be surprised if Faulcon isn't being a LITTLE influenced by her. Faulcon, you do realize that she lived ( & died ) not far from where you are.
As I've stated before, for me it was the opposite. When I first saw a clip of the Shakespearean Sketch, I was put into a state of shock. My mind told me that the young man on the screen could not possibly be Paul McCartney. He didn't look at all like him.
Talk about blowing my programming.
I watched that clip over & over again. Then I watched some clips of Paul, "post" September 1966.
It hit me so hard, I felt sick to my stomach.
Then I spent the rest of the day crying.
Noone could ever accuse us of NOT taking this seriously.
We take it VERY seriously.
I have been comparing photos of Paul & his replacement(s) since 2003.
Watching that sketch changed my life.
Karol, don't you think that we wish it was that simple ? As horrible as brainwashing is, at least Paul would still be alive. The fact is, the differences between Paul & Faul always remained constant. Paul has a smaller forehead & larger ears. Paul had a smaller, rounder head & face. Paul has eyes that are wider apart & were brown. He had a larger chin with a cleft in it. These are all constants. They never changed. After September, 1966, "Paul's" ears were first close to his head, and then further out, and then close to his head, then further out, ad nauseum. His forehead ( & head )was larger than Paul's. His whole body was built differently than Paul's. You might find photos of Paul that were published post September 1966 in which his face appears longer, but NOT ONE that was published before that date. Why is that ? Because after Paul died, those in power scrambled to try to hide that fact. As soon as they found a replacement, they immediately began altering photos.
You can brain wash a person, but would that totally change their bone structure ? It's sad to say, but believing that he was replaced is a more logical deduction.

The Shakespearean Sketch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj7wYVjwfyk

the Beatles - Hello Goodbye:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QShSmpI0r9k

I wish the above video was clearer.

More to come.

[truthseeker49]

The Beatles, 1966 - Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdCjaiXmUb0

the Beatles, 1967 - Faul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLxTpsIVzzo

James Paul McCartney - created by a devoted fan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NXI19k2Fsk

the Beatles - Savoy Truffle - whomever created this only used photos of the Beatles post September, 1966:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZHsXjSSpDk

The Beatles - Ticket to Ride, 1965
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etjpcF2X_mY

the Beatles - Revolution - 1968
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yq372R4Ts

I can keep this up all day. The fact is, you're either going to see it or your not. We're very grateful for every single person who sees these threads & it opens their minds to the truth concerning Paul.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Have anyone ever thought of the possiblity that Paul didint died, but is a mind controled person- that period of his possibly death he could have been through a mind control program? (what can explain the changes in his personality)... is a possibilty that i was thinking about....
My personal feeling is that he was a strong personality who was not programmable. As truthseeker said, mind control wouldn't explain the physical changes. Unfortunately, he didn't really seem to realize the kind of people he was dealing w/, or what they were capable of.

this could explain that cia murder lennon and with paul, to dont be so obvious, they mind controled him....
I have no doubt that John was assassinated by the CIA. But again, I tend to think that he wasn't particularly programmable, either, & that's why he had to be killed. That man was very outspoken & didn't give a sh*t what people thought :D

[orbandsceptre27]

I have no doubt that John was assassinated by the CIA. But again, I tend to think that he wasn't particularly programmable, either, & that's why he had to be killed. That man was very outspoken & didn't give a sh*t what people thought :D

I agree Faulcon, Chapman could quite easily have been a manchurian type assassin.

Lennon had just released "Double Fantasy," his first studio album in years. He appeared to be happy in life and was ready to go political again. Regan had just been elected President. A newly invigorated Lennon, who had caused more than a few headaches for Nixons administration...... well lets just say the establishment wouldn`t have shed too many tears over his murder!

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I know you've read that Fenton Bresler book, "The Murder of John Lennon," that talked about MDC being a manchurian candidate MK assassin. It's been a while since I read it, but I remember his talking about "The Catcher in the Rye" having been a trigger. I thought it was weird that MDC just sat & waited for the cops after he (or whoever) shot John. What I thought was really weird was that MDC lived in Hawaii. He made 2 trips to NY to kill John, b/c it didn't happen on the 1st trip. I had always just assumed that MDC lived in NY. It seems like a long way to go to shoot a pop-star... Also, MDC had rather a lot of money for a guy w/ a pretty bad job, don't you think? Actually, I'm kind of surprised they didn't implant a suicide instruction for MDC after he shot John.

[orbandsceptre27]

^ Yes and there is also the time unaccounted for in Chicago. MDC spent over two days in the city before heading back to NY the second time.

Breslers book is a must read for anyone interested in researching Lennons death. The author (who was a barrister and legal correspondant for a top British newspaper) firmly held the opinion, after years of research, that Lennon was taken out by a manchurian candidate style mind-controlled assassin.

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Didn't he also talk about MDC being in Lebanon or sth? Maybe that's where he was trained?

[orbandsceptre27]

^ Didn't he also talk about MDC being in Lebanon or sth? Maybe that's where he was trained?

Yeah I`ll have to look that up Faulcon. I know he travelled the world with the YMCA (which has been shown up on many occasions as cover for CIA operatives).

He spent an inordinate amount of time in Lebanon while in the Middle East - the CIA trained many of their assassins there.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Getting back to the music for a sec, I think these are so gorgeous. They sound like classical compositions to me:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0p4qPmkVaw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_mlQWBgwQQ&feature=related

Meanwhile, Faul gets made fun of for "Spies Like Us":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD5h83XeEss

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ATt3FXAUY

Really? Same guy? I think not. Spies is catchy & cute in its own way, but def not same depth, IMO.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Faul around 3:50, "I'm doing the Paul McCartney vocal" & at 6:20, "I separate the real me from the famous me. It's a bit schizo. He does the shows & I know it's me. He's sort of famous..." :rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT4MPMjRwIU

Plus, there are some weird face images in that little clip they showed. I know someone did screenshots, but can't find them right now...

[accuracy]

Getting back to the music for a sec, I think these are so gorgeous. They sound like classical compositions to me:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0p4qPmkVaw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_mlQWBgwQQ&feature=related

Meanwhile, Faul gets made fun of for "Spies Like Us":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD5h83XeEss

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ATt3FXAUY

Really? Same guy? I think not. Spies is catchy & cute in its own way, but def not same depth, IMO.

This is a must watch video's, for the knockers, and to quickly enlighten others.:cool:

Both threads are excellent!
(Gotta post some "humour" now, see ya's there:D )

[boots]

I agree Faulcon, Chapman could quite easily have been a manchurian type assassin.

Lennon had just released "Double Fantasy," his first studio album in years. He appeared to be happy in life and was ready to go political again. Regan had just been elected President. A newly invigorated Lennon, who had caused more than a few headaches for Nixons administration...... well lets just say the establishment wouldn`t have shed too many tears over his murder!


Chapman was definitely a MC, after he shot Lennon he sat quietly down and started to read Catcher on the Rye. Fucking very weird.


Lennon was a big threat to the NWO with the plans they had in place in the coming years, they had to shut up any positive thinking.

Still in 2 minds about whether Paul is Faul?

[evea]

hey wouldnt it be ironic
if all this was actually a set up by record companies to keep you talking about a hasbeen rockstar and his dead bandmates


not saying it is though:)

[faulconandsnowjob]

Paul is def not a "has been." Faul is still making money off of his back.

[coco]

Yeah I`ll have to look that up Faulcon. I know he travelled the world with the YMCA (which has been shown up on many occasions as cover for CIA operatives).

He spent an inordinate amount of time in Lebanon while in the Middle East - the CIA trained many of their assassins there.

Interesting.

[queenofleon]

I am gagging for this to come out!

GAGGING...

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I know exactly how you feel! :-P

[queenofleon]

^ I know exactly how you feel! :-P

I bet you do your'e a PID Veteran!!

Can you do me a favour and point me in the direction of the video where one of the beatles lets it slip about FAUL and Ringo looks visably sketchy! I have heard people talk about it but cant seem to find it¬!!


thanks hun!

[coco]

I bet you do your'e a PID Veteran!!

Can you do me a favour and point me in the direction of the video where one of the beatles lets it slip about FAUL and Ringo looks visably sketchy! I have heard people talk about it but cant seem to find it¬!!


thanks hun!

Agreed, that would be fabulous!

[faulconandsnowjob]

Can you do me a favour and point me in the direction of the video where one of the beatles lets it slip about FAUL and Ringo looks visably sketchy! I have heard people talk about it but cant seem to find it¬!!

I think you might be thinking of one w/ George Martin & Ringo... Let me see if I can find it. Maybe Truthseeker or Orb knows where this video is...?

[queenofleon]

I think you might be thinking of one w/ George Martin & Ringo... Let me see if I can find it. Maybe Truthseeker or Orb knows where this video is...?

Thats the one, cheers angel.

[astrochicken]

Something else that just clicked for me, as a musician.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdCjaiXmUb0

Note that in the video above how PAUL doesn't need to look even once
where his fingers are and which fret they should be on.

Paul was a gifted musician.

Compare that most videos of FAUL and especially the anthology one where an irate george gives up trying to teach FAUL a simple bass riff after 3 attempts.

George (the guitarist) trying to teach Faul (a novelty pianist) a simple bass riff. George woulnd't have to have told paul (a gifted bassist and guitarist(paul was the original lead guitarist!!) anything.


Watch Faul footage.. he even looks at his fingers when changing around in 1st position G,C,F .. i mean fuck.. he'll often even looks when he hits an open string like on A to E..

Of course, though, *if* Paul has not had a body, face and charisma transplant followed by a sudden onset of alzheimers resulting in an inexplicable loss of taste and talent then i would have to assume he has been replaced.

Miss the eyelashes.


I didn't know that George Harrison's last album was called "Brainwashed"

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Excellent observation. Faul does glance at his fingers quite a bit, doesn't he?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL1qCO04dpg

Is this the clip you were talking about from "Let It Be" about them arguing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7t_YlUl1PI

Funny that it's "too complicated" for Faul :rolleyes:

I didn't know that George Harrison's last album was called "Brainwashed"
Yeah, right? And John's was "Double Fantasy." Maybe those guys were trying to tell us something?

[karol2020]

this photo: http://www.rarebeatles.com/album/album.htm
is from after or before his supost death?

[karol2020]

the one at the end of page

[howie]

There is another scene from that film (let it be) where Faul is saying to George & John - "you used to do it lads" "those films I've been looking at". The clip can be found in one of the iamaphoney rotten apple videos.

He is clearly stating he was not part of the group in the early days, if he was there, he would have said "we used to do it" & he wouldn't need to watch old films to remind him of things the Beatles did just 3-4 years ago.


edit* it's this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cefEXago5k8

[faulconandsnowjob]

Karol, this pic:

http://www.rarebeatles.com/album/photoa21.jpg

Would be of Faul :)

Thanks for posting that video, Howie. Do you happen to have the link to the one w/ George Martin & Ringo?

[truthseeker49]

Faulcon wrote about John:
I have no doubt that John was assassinated by the CIA. But again, I tend to think that he wasn't particularly programmable, either, & that's why he had to be killed. That man was very outspoken & didn't give a sh*t what people thought

Girl, you just said a mouthful !

Orb wrote - I agree Faulcon, Chapman could quite easily have been a manchurian type assassin.

Lennon had just released "Double Fantasy," his first studio album in years. He appeared to be happy in life and was ready to go political again. Regan had just been elected President. A newly invigorated Lennon, who had caused more than a few headaches for Nixons administration...... well lets just say the establishment wouldn`t have shed too many tears over his murder!

That is all very true. I think that it's far from being a coincidence that John was hidden away for 5 years. His behaviour during that time was bizarre at best. I wouldn't be surprised if he was subjected to different mind-control techniques, including various drugs.
Everything seemed to fail because John fought valiantly to come back to himself.
I don't know if I've mentioned this on this forum, but I came face to face with John in 1980. He had a studio a few floors above where I worked. My girlfriend & I got in an elevator with him once. I didn't recognize him, but she sure did. She said hi, then she elbowed me & whispered in my ear who he was. I was shocked. Totally shocked. He looked so thin & drawn, almost frail. He had dark glasses on & seemed preoccupied. He was nothing like I would've expected him to be. He looked very serious, and muttered under his breath when my friend said hello. We got off the elevator first.
I will never forget how bad he looked.

Orb wrote -Breslers book is a must read for anyone interested in researching Lennons death. The author (who was a barrister and legal correspondant for a top British newspaper) firmly held the opinion, after years of research, that Lennon was taken out by a manchurian candidate style mind-controlled assassin.

Faulcon wrote that she is surprised that they didn't have MDC kill himself afterwards. I think they kept him alive so that he could give all the right answers & they wouldn't have to look for any accomplices. I know for a fact that he didn't act alone. The Catcher in the Rye was most definitely the trigger.
Like many mind-controlled subjects, MDC totally believes whatever it is that they want him to believe.


The Eleanor Rigby composition & The Family Way are both classical. Both of them are deep & seem a little sad. Faul's stuff comes across as "trite" in comparison.
Queenofleon, you're not the only one "gagging for this to come out." I've been banging my head against the wall since 2003 trying to get people to acknowledge the truth. I now have a perpetual headache !

Astro was kind enough to post this:
Note that in the video above how PAUL doesn't need to look even once
where his fingers are and which fret they should be on.

Paul was a gifted musician.

Compare that most videos of FAUL and especially the anthology one where an irate george gives up trying to teach FAUL a simple bass riff after 3 attempts.

George (the guitarist) trying to teach Faul (a novelty pianist) a simple bass riff. George woulnd't have to have told paul (a gifted bassist and guitarist(paul was the original lead guitarist!!) anything.


Watch Faul footage.. he even looks at his fingers when changing around in 1st position G,C,F .. i mean fuck.. he'll often even looks when he hits an open string like on A to E..


Anyone who is a musician & is open-minded about the situation would make the exact same observation that you did, Astro. I have seen people post this same argument pro & con on the Nothing Is Real forum. There are some hard core PIAers at NIR who seem to spend all of their spare time thinking up excuses for Faul. It's more than obvious in every video/movie I have watched with Paul performing, that he was a consumate performer & musician. He knew his stuff. He used to practice guitar up to 14 hours a day !

Double Fantasy, Brainwashed ... Yeah, I think they were trying to tell us something alright.

Karol, this is Faul:
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/faul.jpg
Paul, for comparison:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/BeatlesBathingsuits.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/old_swmsuit.jpg
And this is Paul:
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/PaulRuth.jpg

Coco, John did look pretty bad. It probably was from a combination of things.
Faulcon, you're 100% right. I just posted 2 photos of Paul as comparisons for that one of Faul.

[howie]

Do you happen to have the link to the one w/ George Martin & Ringo?

Which video is it? the south bank show? Ringo & George M are in that with Faul playing guitar very badly

[coco]

John did look bad in his latter year photos. With glasses and hat I would not have known it was him unless his name was associated with the photos. Maybe he became vegatarian???? I've known older vegatarians who are very thin and don't look so good in comparison with a person who regularly eats meat and carbs. I remember he claimed to bake bread so many he indulged in at least some carbs. I don't know.

Without disrespect I don't rule out drugs or alcohol. We know he engaged in them earlier, maybe their effects affected his latter appearance? Maybe he still engaged in them to a certain extent??

Either way, he didn't look good but he was pretty thin in the early seventies too as I recall, but healthier appearing.

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/faul.jpg

^ You can tell that's Faul from the sunken chest & huge feet! Plus, his skin looks a lot older than Paul's did - & this guy was supposedly 25 at this point (1967). :eek:

Faul's feet:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulinshorts.jpg

Paul's feet:
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/hide.jpg

Paul's body:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/florida2.jpg

Faul's body:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/chains25.jpg

Which video is it?
I think it's the one where George M says something like Paul couldn't be there at some awards presentations or something & Ringo made a weird face. I could be wrong - maybe she's talking about a difft video.

Maybe he [John] became vegatarian????
Maybe, but it wouldn't necessarily explain the change in appearance. My parents & I are all veg, & def not emaciated. It's true, it's a little easier to maintain a lower weight as a veg, but I didn't notice any drastic changes (I've been veg for 9 yrs, they've been for about 9 months)

Oh, here's a link w/ some info on John that is kind of interesting:

http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=guilty&action=display&thread=1150

He was hanging out w/ the spook-infested Laurel Canyon crowd at some point.

[coco]

Hmmmm...... The wire tap thing is perfectly in line. Prominent people who are outspoken and at times disagreeing are tapped. Jesse Ventura claims he knows he was tapped. Jesse didn't play their game entirely. He wanted to run his state as governor the best he knew for the state's benefit.

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ There was an FBI file on John Lennon & George Carlin, too.

[orbandsceptre27]

I bet you do your'e a PID Veteran!!

Can you do me a favour and point me in the direction of the video where one of the beatles lets it slip about FAUL and Ringo looks visably sketchy! I have heard people talk about it but cant seem to find it¬!!


thanks hun!


It could be this one you`re thinking of Queenofleon, with George Martin and Ringo at an award ceremony.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMuEclx74WE&feature=channel_page

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHW67xlNIP0&feature=channel_page

"I think we all have to pay tribute to Ringo here, and George and Paul who can`t be with us........ (Woops....pause :cool:) ...and...... (pause) of course..............John, and I guess we miss those guys a hell of alot!

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ That was the one I was thinking of. Thanks! :)

We sure miss those guys... BTW, George Martin has been knighted, just like Sir Faul.

[orbandsceptre27]

Hey Boots and welcome -

Chapman was definitely a MC, after he shot Lennon he sat quietly down and started to read Catcher on the Rye. Fucking very weird.

Yeah it was very strange wasn`t it - It was Breslers book which really opened my eyes to this. Chapman wasn`t even a Beatles fan from what I gather. This whole "lone nut/deranged fan" idea seems to be a no go as those close to Chapman have already stated he had no great fascination for the Beatles, or Lennon.

Lennon was a big threat to the NWO with the plans they had in place in the coming years, they had to shut up any positive thinking.

I agree, Lennon had become an anti-establishment figure who could draw on great support, and he appeared to be very sincere.

Still in 2 minds about whether Paul is Faul?

All I`ll say is keep an open mind mate - It took me quite a while to realise it!

[orbandsceptre27]

^ That was the one I was thinking of. Thanks! :)

We sure miss those guys... BTW, George Martin has been knighted, just like Sir Faul.

Yeah it`s always a concern isn`t it - Has made me look at our own "St." Sir Bob Geldof in a different light too!

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I wonder, what exactly is the "service to the Queen" Sir Faul & Sir George have rendered? And just for the sake of argument, assume it actually was Paul, how was his "service" difft from the other Beatles'? Sir Faul has, apparently, done something above & beyond what the other Beatles did. Right?

[orbandsceptre27]

^ I wonder, what exactly is the "service to the Queen" Sir Faul & Sir George have rendered? And just for the sake of argument, assume it actually was Paul, how was his "service" difft from the other Beatles'? Sir Faul has, apparently, done something above & beyond what the other Beatles did. Right?

Exactly - judging from Pauls last interviews he was his own man. He actually came cross a little frustrated that he couldn`t speak his own mind. Paul didn`t give two fawks what anyone thought, but he wouldn`t go out of his way to offend anyone either lol.

I actually admire Bill alot in what he`s had to do - He`s played a role, and for the most part he`s made few errors. People say Bill has no talent compared to the man he had to become. Well to me he had to play it safe musically, for fear of being found out.

As they say, genius comes from within. Bill could never truely tap into his own genius, as he`s always been playing someone else. He has never really been allowed to be himself -

Sad really - He has all these hundreds of millions, but he can`t be his own own man....always playing a role. If there`s someone left to make a statement about who he is and to stand up and be a man, then it`s Bill.....!

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ It's a f*cked up situation for everybody involved. I wonder if Faul knew what he was getting into? If he even had a choice? :eek:

[orbandsceptre27]

^ It's a f*cked up situation for everybody involved. I wonder if Faul knew what he was getting into? If he even had a choice? :eek:

Well his entire family is built on a lie, which is a sad thing. All the money in the world won`t placate the mind. Like a king without a kingdom or an emperor without any clothes.

We`ve all told lies at one time or another, and it`s not a nice place to be. He`d loose all his fans if he comes forward - but that`s fickle lol, he`d gain more respect eventually for being himself! I think it`s much more to do with protecting those he loves.

A detached man is a very dangerous man to TPTB. And lets face it, you never really loose anybody.

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ You know who else's lives are lies? Spies. lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27ATt3FXAUY

A detached man is a very dangerous man to TPTB...
Ah, that reminds me of this quote:

...I learnt that fame is an illusion & everything about it is just a joke. I'm far more dangerous now, because I don't care at all.
—Joe Strummer to Chris Salewicz – 2000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Strummer

Joe Strummer was born as John Graham Mellor in Ankara, Turkey on 21 August 1952. ... His father, Ronald Mellor, was a British foreign-service diplomat...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Strummer


Anyway, there's more info about him here:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=723295&highlight=joe+strummer#post723295

I kind of suspect he was another one who wouldn't play the game.

[orbandsceptre27]

^ Good quote from Strummer and that`s a v interesting vid, "Spies Like Us."

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I know - Faul is always dropping hints, isn't he?

Anyway, getting back to music, I know for a lot of people the bass is just "there," but I love Paul's bass in this song :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQCi6ASHVUM

[dream9]

Anyway, getting back to music, I know for a lot of people the bass is just "there," but I love Paul's bass in this song :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQCi6ASHVUM


This video was put together for the Anthology. Go to 1:27 and the words are "..but now he's gone" just as Paul's face is shown. Coincidence? I doubt it.

Btw, my name for this forum is based on Lennon's song "#9 Dream" which was written about Paul. Paul was number 9(9 letters in the name McCartney or being born on the 18th, 1 + 8 = 9). That was the nickname for Paul after his death, a Lennonism for sure. Anyway, listen to the lyrics on "#9 Dream" and you'll understand what John was singing about, his life with Paul. It will surely shock you that you've missed it all the this time and it may make you sad also.

[amabus]

SIRIUS XM Radio to Launch Paul McCartney's Fireman Radio

Fireman Radio to give listeners unprecedented access to Paul McCartney

McCartney to host weekly "fireside chats"

NEW YORK, Feb. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- SIRIUS XM Radio (NASDAQ: SIRI) announced today that it will launch a limited-run channel devoted to the music of Paul McCartney, in celebration of his new critically-acclaimed album recorded under the guise of his alter ego, The Fireman. Paul McCartney's Fireman Radio will premiere on Valentine's Day, February 14 and will air through Friday, March 13 on The Bridge, SIRIUS channel 33 and XM channel 27. The channel will feature a rare in-depth and revealing interview with Paul McCartney. During the interview, the legendary artist will share his inspiration behind his secret Fireman projects.

Full story here:
http://sev.prnewswire.com/radio/20090205/NY6710505022009-1.html

McCartney, on Fireman Radio, will take SIRIUS XM listeners on an in-depth exploration of each song from The Fireman's latest album, Electric Arguments. He will speak candidly and openly about every track and will shed new light on this acclaimed music project, which for years has been shrouded in secrecy. On Paul McCartney's Fireman Radio, McCartney will pull back the curtain to reveal the creative process behind The Fireman. Never before has McCartney shared so many personal insights into this fascinating chapter in his musical legacy.

This could be very interesting...

[amabus]

http://www.sirius.com/firemanradio

check this out.

[faulconandsnowjob]

This video [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQCi6ASHVUM] was put together for the Anthology. Go to 1:27 and the words are "..but now he's gone" just as Paul's face is shown. Coincidence? I doubt it.

I did notice that! I def don't think that was a coincidence. There are so many clues like that...

Btw, my name for this forum is based on Lennon's song "#9 Dream" which was written about Paul. Paul was number 9(9 letters in the name McCartney or being born on the 18th, 1 + 8 = 9). That was the nickname for Paul after his death, a Lennonism for sure. Anyway, listen to the lyrics on "#9 Dream" and you'll understand what John was singing about, his life with Paul. It will surely shock you that you've missed it all the this time and it may make you sad also.

Yes, it's very sad! :(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ThzeFA8lg

So long ago
Was it in a dream, was it just a dream?
I had know, yes I know
Seemed so very real, it seemed so real to me

Took a walk down the street
Thru the heat whispered trees
I thought I could hear (hear, hear, hear)
Somebody call out my name as it started to rain

Two spirits dancing so strange

Ah! böwakawa poussé, poussé
Ah! böwakawa poussé, poussé
Ah! bö
wakawa poussé, poussé

Dream, dream away
Magic in the air, was magic in the air?
I believe, yes I believe
More I cannot say, what more can I say?

On a river of sound
Thru the mirror go round, round
I thought I could feel (feel, feel, feel)
Music touching my soul, something warm, sudden cold
The spirit dance was unfolding

Ah! böwakawa poussé, poussé
Ah! böwakawa poussé, poussé
Ah! böwakawa poussé, poussé

http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/9-Dream-lyrics-John-Lennon/79B1F6056F06646148256BCA00083480

Yeah, Paul was a 9 numerologically speaking, right?
P(8) + A(1) + U(6) + L(3) = 18 = 1+8 = 9

Also Revolution #9 w/ all the famous PID clues...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1G9wLGit4k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG0wksBzKSc

Thanks for that info about Sirius radio, Amabus, & welcome to the thread! :-)

[amabus]

regarding the "9" connection did you notice "Sirius 33 - XM 27" on that fireman radio link? in one of the videos Faul talks about the Beatles pretending to be another band (Sgt Pepper).

[faulconandsnowjob]

regarding the "9" connection did you notice "Sirius 33 - XM 27" on that fireman radio link?
Yes, I did! The 27 is def a 9, right? 33 is a pretty significant number, isn't it? Unfort, I don't know that much about numerology. Orb is the resident expert on that, as far as I know :) This is what he said on the stepford thread:


Originally Posted by faulconandsnowjob
.....I've been meaning to ask you about Paul McCartney's name - why he chose to go by Paul instead of James, which was his first name.
I agree Faulcon - it`s not often someone switches to their middle name like that. Most likely he preferred the name Paul and decided to stick with it. Many artists, especially writers, go under "pen names" but that`s usually to deflect attention from their own personal lives.

Quote:
So, according to my calculations, "Paul McCartney" comes out to 9, while "James McCartney" comes out to 5. "Paul" came out to 9, "McCartney" came out to 9, and "James" came out to 5. Do you think there's any significance? The Beatles have been called a "supernatural" band before, so maybe!
You`re right with Paul and James as 9 and 5 respectively. McCartney though is an 8 instead of a 9. So "James McCartney" comes to 4, "Paul McCartney" is an 8 and "James Paul McCartney" is 22/4 the frequency of the Master Builder which I mentioned (indicating an old soul).

Generally in numerology if you want to find the entity number of an individual then use only the name(s) the individual commonly goes by, i.e how a person signs their name etc. In McCartneys case it was simply "Paul McCartney." To get a fuller indication of the entity then take the full birth name as it was written on the birth certificate.

For example, "Bob Geldof" was born "Robert Frederick Zenon Geldof," - but presuming he now goes by the title "Bob Geldof" (and constantly signs his name as such) this is his entity number.

Jewish mystics are very particular about this and certain sects actually leave out the vowels in writing as these are considered the sacred sounds of God or "G_d" as they would write it. So your "soul number" is simply all the vowels in your name added together. James Paul McCartneys soul number was 1 (a+e+a+u+a+e = 19) {1 + 9 = 10/1}.

Of course McCartney is no longer with us, having being replaced by a doppleganger - but his imposter continues to use original Pauls frequency through his name, among other ways. So Billy is keeping the illusion of James Paul McCartney very much alive.

This continuance/carrying of the original frequency can be considered a spell and a very strong one at that, as few recognise that the original McCartney has been replaced long ago.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=721444&highlight=numerology#post721444


And then this about 33:
the Christed "33" (there are two others 11 and 22) under the same system i.e 33 degrees in Freemasonry, Jesus was crucified at 33 years of age etc.

- 33 is the number of "the Master Teacher."

[truthseeker49]

Thanks for that info about Sirius radio, Amabus, & welcome to the thread! :-)

I agree. It is wonderful to meet new people with like minds ! {{{ HUGS }}}

[orbandsceptre27]

Thanks Faulcon - I`m no expert at it, but I do have an interest in it. :)

- The name Paul vibrates to the number nine (under chaldean numerology).

- There are also 5 letters in James and 4 in Paul = 9, and 9 letters in McCartney (9 + 9 = 18/9).

- We all vibrate to a numeric frequency in numerology. Even though there are many important numbers to be calculated for an individual the most imporant is the entity, or name number. This is literally representative of who you are. You`re date of birth is also important as it supposedly indicates what attributes you brought with you into this life. The song Revolution No. 9 (if 9 is seen as representative of Paul) hints at many things.

As we all know, when the words "number nine" are reversed we hear the phrase "turn me on deadman."

To turn is to revolve (revolution) and this constitutes change. All major revolutions bring change and in this case it was a new Paul McCartney, Faul (or Bill). "Turn me on deadman" - the dead man being the number 9 - Paul.


Hi Amabus and thanks for the new radio site info. Yes 33 and 27 are significant numbers - 33 is the number of the master teacher, while 27 denotes the end and the beginning.

http://www.sirius.com/firemanradio

You`ll notice that it`s called Sirius Satelite Radio, and there`s also a small symbol of a dog with a pentagram (5-pointed star) for an eye. That`s because the planet Sirius is known as "The Dogstar" and worshipped by many indiginous tribes around the world. Sirius is the brightest star in the sky and located in the constellation of Canis Major (big dog).

It is interesting that the word "dog" is the reverse of the word "god" - Did our supposed gods (creators) come from Sirius?? The truth is often hidden in plain sight. ;)

[amabus]

Thanks Faulcon - I`m no expert at it, but I do have an interest in it. :)

- The name Paul vibrates to the number nine (under chaldean numerology).

- There are also 5 letters in James and 4 in Paul = 9, and 9 letters in McCartney (9 + 9 = 18/9).

- We all vibrate to a numeric frequency in numerology. Even though there are many important numbers to be calculated for an individual the most imporant is the entity, or name number. This is literally representative of who you are. You`re date of birth is also important as it supposedly indicates what attributes you brought with you into this life. The song Revolution No. 9 (if 9 is seen as representative of Paul) hints at many things.

As we all know, when the words "number nine" are reversed we hear the phrase "turn me on deadman."

To turn is to revolve (revolution) and this constitutes change. All major revolutions bring change and in this case it was a new Paul McCartney, Faul (or Bill). "Turn me on deadman" - the dead man being the number 9 - Paul.


Hi Amabus and thanks for the new radio site info. Yes 33 and 27 are significant numbers - 33 is the number of the master teacher, while 27 denotes the end and the beginning.

http://www.sirius.com/firemanradio

You`ll notice that it`s called Sirius Satelite Radio, and there`s also a small symbol of a dog with a pentagram (5-pointed star) for an eye. That`s because the planet Sirius is known as "The Dogstar" and worshipped by many indiginous tribes around the world. Sirius is the brightest star in the sky and located in the constellation of Canis Major (big dog).

It is interesting that the word "dog" is the reverse of the word "god" - Did our supposed gods (creators) come from Sirius?? The truth is often hidden in plain sight. ;)

Hello everyone and thank you all for the warm welcomes.

A tribe called the Dogon from Mali in Africa came up in another thread. NOGOD backwards. "The Dogon of Mali in West Africa are a tribe of deep mystery, remarkable for their knowledge of astronomy and the unshakable belief that they were once visited by intelligent beings from the star system Sirius."
http://www.space-2001.net/html/the_dogon_.html

I had a very interesting dream about Mali. Fascinating.

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Thank you for that excellent analysis of "Revolution 9," Orb! :)

Did our supposed gods (creators) come from Sirius??
It's a definite poss ;-) (ahem, cetacean thread - lol :D)

[amabus]

^ Thank you for that excellent analysis of "Revolution 9," Orb! :)


It's a definite poss ;-) (ahem, cetacean thread - lol :D)

Yes, Orb. Thank you. Faulcon, what did you mean by"(ahem, cetacean thread - lol :D)"?

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ I mean to go check out the cetacean thread - that's where the Sirius/Dogon topic came up :)
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=49016

[faulconandsnowjob]

Someone on PID Miss Him just posted this.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/let_it_be_single.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/BohLetItBeUNDOCTOREDTRUE2.jpg

I thought it looked like the photos on the final "Let It Be" version had been compressed from top to bottom. Also, I always thought it was a little weird to have the mic hiding "the cute Beatle's" face.

[astrochicken]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/BohLetItBeUNDOCTOREDTRUE2.jpg

I thought it looked like the photos on the final "Let It Be" version had been compressed from top to bottom. Also, I always thought it was a little weird to have the mic hiding "the cute Beatle's" face.

DAMN. Is that the original album cover on the left???????

If it is, then that should seal the case for anyone here that still doubts that he's been replaced.

Compare Faul on the left (original album cover) with the modified Faul (rereleased) on the right..
who can have any doubts if they're rereleasing albums with new album covers?????

It's not *just* compressed...look at the unmodified hair and parting (on the left) with the different photograph (on the right)
that has so obviously been run once through the McCartney Paulizer photoshop-addon.

To throw in an overused expression: "THAT is a smoking gun"

[faulconandsnowjob]

Check this one, too. This mag cover is from 1970:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/BravoOctober.jpg

Does it look familiar? Like maybe the White Album pic?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/ProofofTampering.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/FaulPaulFPaul.jpg

I wonder why they used a 2 year old tampered pic?

[howie]

He looks like Stallone in that white album pic.

I've seen another comparsion somewhere of the Let It Be album, the original photo of Faul has a white background not red.

[truthseeker49]

Astro, the photo in that 1st album was taken during the Let It Be sessions. I don't know if there are any albums released using it. I thought that the person who did the comparison used it as an example. Faul DID look that way in that time period, though.
Check out page 84, post # 831. < smile>

[faulconandsnowjob]

some more good stuff from PID Miss Him re: height

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/HeightsTamperedUntampered1966.jpg

http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=plastic&action=display&thread=606&page=6

[astrochicken]

Astro, the photo in that 1st album was taken during the Let It Be sessions. I don't know if there are any albums released using it. I thought that the person who did the comparison used it as an example. Faul DID look that way in that time period, though.
Check out page 84, post # 831. < smile>


and.....???????????????

What's the news? False alarm?

:) :) :)

[faulconandsnowjob]

Interesting comp of Revolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAb4x4BrhXk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yq372R4Ts

[socrates]

This thread is frightening.

[faulconandsnowjob]

This thread is frightening.
Yes, I could see how it could be frightening for some people, i.e. those who don't like to have their perception of "reality" (programming) questioned. :eek:

[socrates]

Yes, I could see how it could be frightening for some people, i.e. those who don't like to have their perception of "reality" (programming) questioned. :eek:

How rude!

[faulconandsnowjob]

did I misinterpret what you were trying to say about this thread being "frightening"? If so, my apologies

[socrates]

Indeed you did misinterpret.

Perhaps a lesson, here?

Thank you for the apology. It is accepted.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Ok, I actually do think it's frightening, tho. It has certainly been a real eye opener for me :eek:

BTW, welcome to the thread, Socrates :)

[socrates]

But let me get this theory straight, if I may. I am open minded about whether Paul is dead or not but I like to evaluate the evidence presented in a clear manner.

You are saying that Paul died in 1966. He was replaced with a lookalike. Was this lookalike chosen before or after Paul died?

[dream9]

Probably before.

[astrochicken]

Ok, I actually do think it's frightening, tho. It has certainly been a real eye opener for me :eek:

Now, I find this thread and it's premise self-evident.

I had my doubts to begin with as i thought the whole "paul is dead" thing was all about nutcases debating backwards song snippets and hints on album sleeve artwork.

No wonder that that is all The-Powers-That-Be reduce it too.
You can't have people looking at photographs and videos and seeing it's not the same person.


As to the reasons why he was replaced one can only speculate.

Maybe he did die in a carcrash and rather than have mass suicides of beatles fans they decided, not unlike the blue peter cat (dog?), to whack in a replacement. From that point of view i could half-understand their reasoning.

Then again, maybe he was murdered, and it's all a big occult brainwashing experiment.

It it was the former then then kudos to faul for keeping the charade going on this long but 40 years is long enough.

If it was the latter.. imagine, knowing what TPTB do all the time,how well he sleeps.
I mean he might wake up one morning to find his usefullness has been deemed unnecessary.
You wonder what goes on in faul's head..."chapman's" round every corner.

[socrates]

Probably before.

Why did they decide to replace him?

[faulconandsnowjob]

I don't know if anyone can know for sure when the replacement was found. I tend to think it was before, too, b/c I think Paul was taken out by tptb & replaced w/ someone more amenable to their agenda. But like Astro said, it's speculation about who did it & why. All I know for sure is that Paul was replaced. :(

This link has some really good info on it, including tons of photo comps.

http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1

[faulconandsnowjob]

Why did they decide to replace him?
Speculation, but I think this ties into the drug agenda. As you probably know, tptb (Tavistock Institute) were pushing a drug agenda back in the mid 1960's - particularly LSD. CIA was using LSD as a possible mind-control drug. Maybe they wanted people to take it to control them more easily, or to derail the bourgeoning anti-war movement. Who knows? I think Paul must have refused to go along w/ this. In one interview in 1965, he said they all refused to tell people not to drink, so he's not going to promote dropping acid, I'm pretty sure. Anyway, not long after Paul was replaced, Faul has his famous LSD interview. Well, if the Beatles are doing it, it must be cool, right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aqGtxoXPLE

John Lennon once said that they (tptb) tried to control people w/ acid, but ended up setting them free.

Some more info:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/beatles_mind_control.htm
http://www.maebrussell.com/Mae%20Brussell%20Articles/Operation%20Chaos.html

[socrates]

As to the reasons why he was replaced one can only speculate.

Maybe he did die in a carcrash and rather than have mass suicides of beatles fans they decided, not unlike the blue peter cat (dog?), to whack in a replacement. From that point of view i could half-understand their reasoning.

They decided? Who is they?

Other famous pop stars have died such as Elvis, Buddy Holly, Hendrix but they were not replaced.

Then again, maybe he was murdered, and it's all a big occult brainwashing experiment.

Why would they decide to murder him?

[truthseeker49]

Socrates, you ask some very good questions. There are no easy answers to your question. I've often asked myself the same thing. Why replace Paul, and not those others ?
If we had the answers to those questions, it would bring us closer to solving this mystery.
All we do know is that Paul WAS replaced. The pictorial, video, and anecdotal evidence is overwhelming.
Come to my forum & check it out. It might help you to figure all of this out. :)

[socrates]

Why replace Paul, and not those others ?
If we had the answers to those questions, it would bring us closer to solving this mystery.

But if you do not have the answers to those questions then why do you believe he was replaced? I do not understand this. You cannot say that he was replaced and then say you do not have the answers.

All we do know is that Paul WAS replaced. The pictorial, video, and anecdotal evidence is overwhelming.

I have seen some of your interesting photos in this thread and I agree that it is frightening if this is all true. But you need more than photos to prove a theory.

However, can you please post the most conclusive photo that proves your theory?

Come to my forum & check it out. It might help you to figure all of this out. :)

I will take a look. Thank you.

[orbandsceptre27]

Hello everyone and thank you all for the warm welcomes.

A tribe called the Dogon from Mali in Africa came up in another thread. NOGOD backwards. "The Dogon of Mali in West Africa are a tribe of deep mystery, remarkable for their knowledge of astronomy and the unshakable belief that they were once visited by intelligent beings from the star system Sirius."
http://www.space-2001.net/html/the_dogon_.html

I had a very interesting dream about Mali. Fascinating.

Ahh that was the tribe I was trying to think of, and (as you`ve pointed out Amabus) it`s amazing that the name again carries the word "God/Dog" and "no" - Coincidental....? Does a cow give milk lol!

Hi Socrates and welcome to the thread. You sound like a wise man - We`re not here (or at least I`m not here) to prove anything to anyone. Enjoy the threads!

[faulconandsnowjob]

I've read that TPTB will replace popular people who cause them trouble so that they can use that popularity to influence other people. People who are not so popular just get offed in "accidents" or have "heart attacks" or whatever.

But if you do not have the answers to those questions then why do you believe he was replaced? I do not understand this. You cannot say that he was replaced and then say you do not have the answers.
Yeah, of course you can. Just b/c we can't know everything that happened behind the scenes, doesn't mean we can't tell there are 2 difft people presenting themselves as "Paul McCartney." I think a big hindrance in seeing the replacement is people's thinking that it's not possible or that the media wouldn't lie about such a thing (does anyone here actually think the media wouldn't lie? :p) I don't know if there's any one definitive thing that clinches it that Paul was replaced. I think you just have to look at various pics & video. Here are some pic comps:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/memphis_66_comp.jpg

^ It shows Paul on Aug 19, 1966, then Faul in 1967 (not sure about the exact date). Here's another shot of Paul on the left from that same interview compared to Faul in Dec 1966:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/1966_comp.jpg

Here's another of Paul compared to Faul in 1967 (Magical Mystery Tour)

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/comp_MMT.jpg

Then this one of Paul from 1965 (left) compared to Faul in "The Fool on the Hill" from MMT:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/fool_hill_comp.jpg

Paul & Faul w/ difft color eyes (smoking gun for me):

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/blueeyes3.jpg

Some people prefer videos or to compare the music, but I like pics :) But when you start seeing that Faul had different colored eyes from Paul, that Paul had a difft shaped face (rounder), thicker eyelashes, difft nose, that Faul was taller than Paul, that pics have been tampered w/, etc, there is really only one logical conclusion: Paul was replaced.

[orbandsceptre27]

^ Great comparisons Faulcon!

But if you do not have the answers to those questions then why do you believe he was replaced?

Well your questions were related to motive Socrates which mean little or nothing if you can`t see that Paul was replaced by an imposter. Getting people to see the differences is the most important part. The vast majority of people still believe they see Paul McCartney when they`re looking at an imposter!

I do not understand this. You cannot say that he was replaced and then say you do not have the answers.

What answers - answers to why he was replaced?

I have seen some of your interesting photos in this thread and I agree that it is frightening if this is all true. But you need more than photos to prove a theory.

What theory, and have you actually seen all the photos?

However, can you please post the most conclusive photo that proves your theory?

Just one........??

If it takes only one photo for you to make up your mind, then it`s not much of a mind you`ve got there Socrates is it??

[faulconandsnowjob]

I came into this being a big Beatles fan & already quite familiar w/ their work, background (well, the "story"), how they looked, etc. It still took me some time comparing the pics & studying the videos before I could see it. There were a lot of things that bothered me before that make sense now that I know that Paul was replaced. Talk about a big a-ha moment.

" The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."
~ J. Edgar Hoover

There is also the fact that most people do not want to believe that Paul was replaced. It's horrible. No one wants to think sth bad happened to him :( It's much more pleasant to think he is still w/ us. So, this desire is another obstacle to seeing the truth, imo.

Another comp:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/lipstick.jpg

[theweetoon]

Faulcon.....you're patience astounds me...:)
This thread is great!!

[grachtengordel]

then again, maybe he was murdered, and it's all a big occult brainwashing experiment.

yup. by the way, has anyone noticed yet that all the (original) beetles were jewish?

[astrochicken]

yup. by the way, has anyone noticed yet that all the (original) beetles were jewish?

Brian Epstein and Allen Klein most certainly. Linda Eastman (who married faul) most likely.

Ringo looks like yasser arafat.

So what??

There are plenty of other threads where you can post a one-liner and people will jump at the chance to blame it on the *jews* (or THE jesuits did it :P )


Who gives a monkey who's jewish and who's not, as it has bugger all to do with the issue at hand ie. "paul is dead".

[orbandsceptre27]

grachtengordel - yup. by the way, has anyone noticed yet that all the (original) beetles were jewish?


- Ringo Starr (Richard Starkey) is Jewish.

- Paul McCartney was born Roman Catholic.

- John Lennon, Anglican.

- George Harrison, Roman Catholic (later turned to Hinduism).

[orbandsceptre27]

There are plenty of other threads where you can post a one-liner and people will jump at the chance to blame it on the *jews* (or THE jesuits did it :P )


Who gives a monkey who's jewish and who's not, as it has bugger all to do with the issue at hand ie. "paul is dead".

I noticed him spreading disinfo before on other threads Astrochicken.

[coco]

Astrochicken writes:

Maybe he did die in a carcrash and rather than have mass suicides of beatles fans they decided, not unlike the blue peter cat (dog?), to whack in a replacement. From that point of view i could half-understand their reasoning.

Running with the PID theory as truth, I think that if a replacement was installed it would be more so to maintain the profitable venture. Didn't Pink Floyd sing of the 'gravy train'?

[truthseeker49]

Orb, thanks for the info about the boy's religions. I didn't know that Ritchie was Jewish ! I did know that Paul was born Roman Catholic. < smile >

Those are excellent comparisons, Faulcon. I'll stick a few more on here in my next post.

Coco, you might very well be right. That's in the song from their album, " Wish you were here".
"Have a cigar" to be exact...


Come in here, Dear boy, have a cigar.
You're gonna go far,
You're gonna fly high,
You're never gonna die,
You're gonna make it, if you try;
They're gonna love you.
Well I've always had a deep respect,
And I mean that most sincere.
The band is just fantastic,
that is really what I think.
Oh by the way, which one's Pink?

And did we tell you the name of the game, boy?
We call it Riding the Gravy Train.

We're just knocked out.
We hard enough to sell out.
You gotta get an album out.
You owe it to the people.
We're so happy we can hardly count.
Everybody else is just green,
Have you seen the chart?
It's a hell of a start,
It could be made into a monster
If we all pull together as a team.

And did we tell you the name of the game, boy?
We call it Riding the Gravy Train.

[astrochicken]

Astrochicken writes:

Maybe he did die in a carcrash and rather than have mass suicides of beatles fans they decided, not unlike the blue peter cat (dog?), to whack in a replacement. From that point of view i could half-understand their reasoning.

Running with the PID theory as truth, I think that if a replacement was installed it would be more so to maintain the profitable venture. Didn't Pink Floyd sing of the 'gravy train'?


Yep, you are of course right.

It just goes to show how fucked up society is, as i was making the mistake of thinking that saving a life (beatle fan committing suicide upon paul's death) was more valuable than the pursuit of more money.

Damn, try as i may, i really just can't think that way.

[truthseeker49]

Astro - of course you are thinking of the more noble explanation. I'm fairly certain that "saving the fans" was the excuse that "they" gave to friends & family to keep them quiet about Paul's death. However, it is far more than likely that it was all about the MONEY.

Money - Pink Floyd

Money, get away.
Get a good job with good pay and youre okay.
Money, its a gas.
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash.
New car, caviar, four star daydream,
Think I'll buy me a football team.

Money, get back.
I'm all right jack keep your hands off of my stack.
Money, its a hit.
Don't give me that do goody good bullshit.
I'm in the high-fidelity first class traveling set
And I think I need a lear jet.

Money, its a crime.
Share it fairly but dont take a slice of my pie.
Money, so they say
Is the root of all evil today.
But if you ask for a raise it's no surprise that they're
Giving none away.

Huhuh! I was in the right!
Yes, absolutely in the right!
I certainly was in the right!
You was definitely in the right. that geezer was cruising for a
Bruising!
Yeah!
Why does anyone do anything?
I dont know, I was really drunk at the time!
I was just telling him, he couldnt get into number 2. he was asking
Why he wasn't coming up on freely, after I was yelling and
Screaming and telling him why he wasn't coming up on freely.
It came as a heavy blow, but we sorted the matter out (???)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/TPUDec65001.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/faul_airport_closeup.jpg
^ Paul vs. Faul, 1967
Paul http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/youngPaulforehead.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/pid_on_magazine_p2.jpg Faul
Paul http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Western2aaa.jpg Bill>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/IM15.jpg Faul
Paulhttp://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/Paulunusual.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/paul-looking.jpg Faul
Check out the line going down the side of Faul's ear. ;)

[hugolast]

the fact that technology allows photo's to be manipulated at will and in such an authentic and subtle way means that the past is becoming too blurred to be convincing to someone new to this. I think it's really sad that this is an occasion where the 'bad guys' will ultimately win due to the muddying of the water, like knowing you will lose a card gane so you flip the table and it all get jumbled and it makes it impossible to judge either way to a satisfactory degree. they have the resources to keep an eye on all your developments and come up with new ways to cast enough reasonable doubt on the stuff you find. If it wasn't for you guys it would be dead and buried by now and the fact you have got them to seemingly have to do all this is a credit to you. I think you are outgunned here but for what it's worth i believe it and prior to the last few weeks i'd never even heard of it before and now me, my girlfirnd and my mate lee all believe it too.

[coco]

Yep, you are of course right.

It just goes to show how fucked up society is, as i was making the mistake of thinking that saving a life (beatle fan committing suicide upon paul's death) was more valuable than the pursuit of more money.

Damn, try as i may, i really just can't think that way.

Keep thinking the way you do!! That means your a humane person and that's admirable; it shows that I've been in the business 'business' too long and while, yes, I think like you, when it comes to the business machine I am able to think as they.

Not entirely a bad thing. I've turned my experience toward consumer advocacy these past few years. Kinda like switching teams. I know the ins and outs of business and service as well as being a customer myself. I explain to customers about a product or service so they can make an informed decision.

Problem I encounter often is, most of them don't want to learn the difference between this product and price scale vs that product and price scale so they can make that decision. They just want you to tell them what's best for them! How can I know that!!! **mutter mutter**

[truthseeker49]

Thank you, hugolast. That makes it all worth the while.
Coco, it's good that you've changed teams and now you're trying to help people. There is nothing to be ashamed of in that. :)

[truthseeker49]

My son's fiance gave birth to a baby girl 1/7/09 at 1:28 am. She was 6 lbs. 1 oz & 18 & 1/2 inches long. Her name is Emily Marie & she is beautiful.
She is my first grandchild.
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/S7300373.jpg

I've changed my name on my forum from Mommybird to Grannybird ! LOL :D

[swethirte]

If Paul McCartney died in 1966, then who wrote Penny Lane, Hello Goodbye, Hey Jude, Get Back, Let It Be, Live and Let Die, Band on the Run, Silly Love Songs, Mull of Kintyre, Wonderful Christmastime, Ebony and Ivory, and Pipes of Peace, to name just a few? And not to mention all those the fake Paul McCartney co-wrote with John Lennon from 1967 to 1970. Perhaps this imposter is actually a better songwriter than the original?

[coco]

What an angel!!!!! I know you are too excited!!! I'm going to be a great aunt again next month. They grow up sooooo fast. I remember my middle neice toddling about and now she's a mother. My eldest niece just had her third a few months ago. I can't keep up with all the nieces, nephews, and great nieces and nephews birthday (and names :rolleyes:).



As far as my change of mind in business - I became tired of seeing business take advantage of people and people not arming themselves with knowledge.

[astrochicken]

My son's fiance gave birth to a baby girl 1/7/09 at 1:28 am. She was 6 lbs. 1 oz & 18 & 1/2 inches long. Her name is Emily Marie & she is beautiful.
She is my first grandchild.

I've changed my name on my forum from Mommybird to Grannybird ! LOL :D


A wee stoater!!!!!!!

Congratulations Granny :p

[astrochicken]

If Paul McCartney died in 1966, then who wrote Penny Lane, Hello Goodbye, Hey Jude, Get Back, Let It Be, Live and Let Die, Band on the Run, Silly Love Songs, Mull of Kintyre, Wonderful Christmastime, Ebony and Ivory, and Pipes of Peace, to name just a few? And not to mention all those the fake Paul McCartney co-wrote with John Lennon from 1967 to 1970. Perhaps this imposter is actually a better songwriter than the original?

You're strange.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Faulcon.....you're patience astounds me...
This thread is great!!
Why, thank you. Thank you very much :-) If you like the thread, please rate it 5 stars :)

As far as the reason goes for replacing Paul, money could be a motive, but I'm going to go w/ influence. The Illuminati already have pretty much all the money in the world. What they need is popular, influential people to "sell" their agenda.

Originally Posted by swethirte
If Paul McCartney died in 1966, then who wrote Penny Lane, Hello Goodbye, Hey Jude, Get Back, Let It Be, Live and Let Die, Band on the Run, Silly Love Songs, Mull of Kintyre, Wonderful Christmastime, Ebony and Ivory, and Pipes of Peace, to name just a few? And not to mention all those the fake Paul McCartney co-wrote with John Lennon from 1967 to 1970. Perhaps this imposter is actually a better songwriter than the original?
I think it's Paul's voice on "Penny Lane." He may have written it before he was replaced. Same goes for other late Beatles' songs. I know people in bands who will have songs recorded a year or 2 before the CD ever comes out. Paul may have laid down tracks, or at least recorded song ideas prior to whatever happened to him happened.

Personally, I don't think these songs are as strong as anything Paul did:

Live and Let Die, Band on the Run, Silly Love Songs, Mull of Kintyre, Wonderful Christmastime, Ebony and Ivory, and Pipes of Peace

Don't forget "Spies Like Us" :D Compare a few for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxyJLxV0_-8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWuKimtUEas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQCi6ASHVUM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK9QVN0bpa4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiRbZ5R1q2M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVK_mJrLbmY

Is there really any comparison?

Astrochicken: that's a great quote in your signature (I love "JFK"):

Back..and to the left. Back.... and to the left.

Edit: Paul vids

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGakPl8a0eA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTb3uifuKDc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8fNDfdjXd8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaYJaFWTHgM

Faul vids:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf2S7kKLtEQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDJ-015ojec

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXG83p2nkHw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9SgDoypXcI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlWFpdPX45g

Thanks, hugolast! It does make it all worth it to hear that :)

[karol2020]

I have seen you talk about the hands in old posts, but it didnt convincided me, I still think they are too similar, paul and faul have the same fingers size (with the ring finger bigger than the index), the nails shape are the same too... like we see at this link of paulisnotdead: http://www.paulisnotdead.com/blog1.php/2008/07/29/the-same-macca-hands#more13

so I think this is a point against pid theory, the hands cannot change is a very distinct characterist of people and is very difficult- almost impossible-to find two hands equals..

[faulconandsnowjob]

Paul's hands were hairier. Here's a thread w/ comps of hands & feet (big diff w/ the feet):

http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=155

Also, Paul was left-handed, while Faul is right-handed. This pic is a smoking gun, as far as I'm concerned, b/c right-handers cross w/ the right arm on top:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulinshorts.jpg

Anyway, the hands might look similar, but the faces don't :D

[theweetoon]

If Paul McCartney died in 1966, then who wrote Penny Lane, Hello Goodbye, Hey Jude, Get Back, Let It Be, Live and Let Die, Band on the Run, Silly Love Songs, Mull of Kintyre, Wonderful Christmastime, Ebony and Ivory, and Pipes of Peace, to name just a few? And not to mention all those the fake Paul McCartney co-wrote with John Lennon from 1967 to 1970. Perhaps this imposter is actually a better songwriter than the original?

eh heh heh heh, like eh heh heh who wrote the songs then?

[orbandsceptre27]

My son's fiance gave birth to a baby girl 1/7/09 at 1:28 am. She was 6 lbs. 1 oz & 18 & 1/2 inches long. Her name is Emily Marie & she is beautiful.
She is my first grandchild.
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b375/Cavern61/S7300373.jpg

I've changed my name on my forum from Mommybird to Grannybird ! LOL :D

Beautiful picture of her "Grannybird" :p - She`ll be coming home soon so I hope the weather stays mild. Again Congrats - I know she`ll be well looked after! :)

[orbandsceptre27]

I have seen you talk about the hands in old posts, but it didnt convincided me, I still think they are too similar, paul and faul have the same fingers size (with the ring finger bigger than the index), the nails shape are the same too... like we see at this link of paulisnotdead: http://www.paulisnotdead.com/blog1.php/2008/07/29/the-same-macca-hands#more13

so I think this is a point against pid theory, the hands cannot change is a very distinct characterist of people and is very difficult- almost impossible-to find two hands equals..

The hands are an important point Karol. As Faulcon and others have pointed out before, Paul clearly had hairier hands than Faul (esp on the back of his hands).

If we had a palmprint from both Paul and Faul we could quite easily see that they are two different individuals. No two people can have the same palmprint just as no two people can have the same fingerprints.

From the blog you have brought up (even though the quality of shots is not great) it`s easy to see that Pauls hands are smaller/shorter than Fauls.

Examine Pauls thumb and compare it to his index finger (first black and white picture) - do you see how much longer his thumb is to his index finger than Fauls thumb is to Fauls index finger? See how Pauls thumb reaches right up alongside his index finger - Can you envisage Fauls thumb reaching up as far alongside his index finger? Paul has a longer thumb to finger ratio straight off than Faul!

Also compare Pauls index finger to his ring finger. With Paul, both of these fingers are of similar length.
With Faul it is clearly visable that his ring finger is much longer than his index finger!

Even though the pictures are not of great quality, it`s obvious the author of this blog has not paid near enough attention to detail. I hope he doesn`t look for a job in forensics cause he`s blind as a bat lol :).

[faulconandsnowjob]

Excellent analysis, Orb. :)

no two people can have the same fingerprints.
Maybe, but this may turn out to not be true according to my torts professor (RIP). He told this story about an FBI agent who went to a crime scene, but didn't go into the house. Her prints were found inside the house, but she swore up & down that she never went inside the house. It wouldn't have been a big deal if she had, so she had no reason to lie. So, anyway, it seems like people can have the "same" fingerprints.

[orbandsceptre27]

Maybe, but this may turn out to not be true according to my torts professor (RIP). He told this story about an FBI agent who went to a crime scene, but didn't go into the house. Her prints were found inside the house, but she swore up & down that she never went inside the house. It wouldn't have been a big deal if she had, so she had no reason to lie. So, anyway, it seems like people can have the "same" fingerprints.

Faulcon maybe it`s because I`m Irish...... but I wouldn`t trust an FBI or a CIA agent to mow the lawn..... ;) j/k.

You could be right with what you`ve said here though, I think I`ve heard something similar before - there must be those rare exceptions which exist!

I`d find it hard to trust a spook though :cool: :cool: :cool: - If I was the judge I`d have the agent for perjury, no questions asked. Then I`d probably have a little accident with a toaster in my shower a few days later :D ...... all coincidence of course! ;)

[faulconandsnowjob]

Faulcon maybe it`s because I`m Irish...... but I wouldn`t trust an FBI or a CIA agent to mow the lawn..... j/k.
No, neither would I - lol. The more you know about intell, the more paranoid it will make you - & w/ good reason :eek: Seriously, you can't trust anybody or anything. Almost anything could be a cover...

Well, anyway, fingerprints are matched based on how many points they have in common, right?

BTW, I'm putting your analysis on PID Miss Him, Orb. Hope that's cool :)

[orbandsceptre27]

^ No bother at all - if it`s of help then fire ahead!

[faulconandsnowjob]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/McCartneyIItruth.jpg

Faul's body gets flipped, but his face does not flip
The right image is largely made up of the face of James Paul McCartney

http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=plastic&action=display&thread=606&page=7

[grachtengordel]

There are plenty of other threads where you can post a one-liner and people will jump at the chance to blame it on the *jews* .

what are you trying to say? I concurred with one post , then asked a question. how exactly is that 'blaming' anyone for anything?

there are plenty of other threads for you to try to twist someones posts in order to stifle debate and promote your paranoia

Who gives a monkey who's jewish and who's not?

the aparthied state currently occupying PALESTINE seems to "give a monkey". you try living there if you are not jewish

it has bugger all to do with the issue at hand ie. "paul is dead".

how do you know that? are you faul? if you KNOW so much about all the angles of this story, please reveal it to us, if YOU really KNOW what does have "bugger all to do with the issue" then why have you not told ALL and resolved this issue/thread?

- Ringo Starr (Richard Starkey) is Jewish.
- Paul McCartney was born Roman Catholic.
- John Lennon, Anglican.
- George Harrison, Roman Catholic (later turned to Hinduism).

I meant the 'ethnicty' of the beetles, not the religion of thier parents or the religion they may have chosen later in life

lennon was definately jewish

I noticed him spreading disinfo before on other threads Astrochicken.

how is asking a question "disinfo"? If i did not offer 'info ' in the post to which you are referring, how can the post be "disinfo"?

[grachtengordel]

If Paul McCartney died in 1966, then who wrote Penny Lane, Hello Goodbye, Hey Jude, Get Back, Let It Be, Live and Let Die, Band on the Run, Silly Love Songs, Mull of Kintyre, Wonderful Christmastime, Ebony and Ivory, and Pipes of Peace, to name just a few?

ALL beetles songs were written by the tavistock institute

[hugolast]

does anyone knows whether paul connected his p to the a before 67 cause after he connects it.
http://i43.tinypic.com/24uw9l1.jpg

before 1967 it's separate
http://i41.tinypic.com/98uf60.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/nywmc8.jpg
(Museum of Liverpool)

[brainfreeze]

does anyone knows whether paul connected his p to the a before 67 cause after he connects it.
http://i43.tinypic.com/24uw9l1.jpg

before 1967 it's separate
http://i41.tinypic.com/98uf60.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/nywmc8.jpg
(Museum of Liverpool)

The loop in the L is also FATTER in the later sig. Rather symbolic I would think. And what's with the added bit on the end?

[hugolast]

if i wasn't paul mccartney i'd stop writing my second name on autographs and stick with just paul it's easier and you can't analyse it properly

http://www.frasersautographs.com/gallery.asp?sid={E1A7740B-89ED-406F-91A2-6ADA12A4FA6B}

[hugolast]

some pics of faul

http://i39.tinypic.com/33cmzdj.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/2ih5x7r.jpg
right handed

http://i40.tinypic.com/abmb5u.jpg

[karol2020]

does anyone knows whether paul connected his p to the a before 67 cause after he connects it.
http://i43.tinypic.com/24uw9l1.jpg

before 1967 it's separate
http://i41.tinypic.com/98uf60.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/nywmc8.jpg
(Museum of Liverpool)

interesting.. i have found this site that seems very confiable and shows many authographs of them through the years to compare.... we have to take care cause they have many false authograps...
take a look: http://www.beatlescollecting.com/the-beatles/faqs/beatles-autographs.html

[faulconandsnowjob]

ALL beetles songs were written by the tavistock institute
I've read that before, but I don't think so. The songs were not as good after Paul died, imo.

Here's an example of Paul's handwriting. I got it from the Klaus Voormann book.

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/KV_paul_note.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/KV_paul_sketch.jpg

This is an ex. of Faul's handwriting:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/graphics/packageart/paul/mccartney2.gif

(from the http://www.thesmokinggun.com website)

[hugolast]

is there a long version of his signiture after 1966 or did it turn to that squiggle after the name paul?

[hugolast]

http://i43.tinypic.com/2lvlifb.jpg
who's the guy with them? aspinall?

http://i42.tinypic.com/1588ql0.jpg
looks really unlike paul would have i think.

[karol2020]

is there a long version of his signiture after 1966 or did it turn to that squiggle after the name paul?

yes there is. in that site i gave... like this one of 67 during the film of magical mistery tour.


http://www.autographworld.com/beatles/images/pic24.jpg

[liltroofer]

Wow. I never gave this thought, but when you compare the photos in this way, it's pretty obvious there are two different people named Paul McCartney. Disturbing. But is it really true or just photographic oddities?

Has anyone cited a reason for this being the case? And I don't mean in an academic paper; obviously that would not be allowed if this were a protected secret. But I mean a reason for Paul being dead?

[faulconandsnowjob]

Welcome to the thread, liltroofer! :)

I don't think it's just photographic oddities w/ Paul. I've compared tons of pics & Paul looks like Paul & Faul looks like Faul, for the most part (I think there may have been one main Faul w/ a couple of stand-ins, but this has not been def confirmed). If you think it might just be photos, then check out some of the videos.

As far as a reason for Paul being dead, it's pretty much anybody's guess. My personal feeling is that he wouldn't "get w/ the program" ( ie, wouldn't go along w/ the drug/LSD agenda) & was replaced w/ someone who was more amenable. Faul came out talking about LSD in 1967, & he has been knighted for "service to the Queen." (John, on the other hand, returned his MBE). Faul has also had a ton of support from the media. I don't think it would've been possible to keep this charade going for so long w/o the media's help. It's funny/tragic/ironic that the truth almost came out back in 1969.

[truthseeker49]

Excellent response, Faulcon. Come & check out my forum, liltroofer. It will definitely further open your eyes & mind !

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Thanks! & PID Miss Him is an excellent source of information. :)

[dream9]

I think Paul, being the "cute" Beatle and the one popular with the ladies, was a sacrificial killing by the Illuminati.

[truthseeker49]

I would NOT be surprised. And he annoyed the shit out of them by not doing everything that he was told to do. By 1965, he became the "squeaky wheel". I don't think that he was killed by "the Crown" per se. I think that a branch of "The Illuminati" did it, and another branch had to cover up the mess.
This is all IMHO of course.:(

[faulconandsnowjob]

^ Paul could def have been a ritual sacrifice. Maybe he was chosen for his looks, or maybe b/c he wasn't a team player. Maybe both.

[hugolast]

it seems that the signitures are diferrent, has there been any work done on them being done by different people? Surely this can be a fact in all of this?

What happens when enough of the original photographs have been messed up/lossed/rereleased and adjusted by the powers that be so that people dont then start to question anymore and the battle is lost because people think it's too far fetched and he always looked that way?

It's hard enough to get people to 'notice' already and when looking at the photo's a couple of composites have had me thinking it was me who was wrong and it was the same person. I feel like a need a section in composite faces along side the paul and faul ones.

oh and there's a load of signed original faul pictures on this site, like pics of actual photographs of him out and about don't know if they're any use to anyone.

http://www.frasersautographs.com/

[karol2020]

why do some authograps of them have "XXX" draw? it has some meaning or they only like to draw it?

from 1962
http://www.autographworld.com/beatles/images/pic2.jpg

set of hard days night
http://www.autographworld.com/beatles/images/pic12.jpg


in others have more X like this one 5 X from 62 too:

http://www.autographworld.com/beatles/images/pic3.jpg

[truthseeker49]

Hugolast, that is so very true. That is why I stress that people should go to local collectible shops to try to get/ or even just examine vintage material. Autographed photos, magazines, books. Anything that was published prior to September 1966.
Karol, I am pretty sure that the "X"s are a symbol for either " love" or "kisses ".:D

[theweetoon]

http://center-of-beat.com/img/ak/op_b0902.jpghttp://center-of-beat.com/img/ak/op_b0904.jpg

Ok, ready? here we go, Big Smile now boys!!

Cool photos though

[faulconandsnowjob]

it seems that the signitures are diferrent, has there been any work done on them being done by different people? Surely this can be a fact in all of this?
I think Mal Evans would sign autographs for them, wouldn't he? I'm pretty confident the exemplars of Paul's handwriting I posted from the Klaus Voormann book are legit b/c he knew them in Hamburg before they made it. But, I suppose you can never be sure.

What happens when enough of the original photographs have been messed up/lossed/rereleased and adjusted by the powers that be so that people dont then start to question anymore and the battle is lost because people think it's too far fetched and he always looked that way?

It's hard enough to get people to 'notice' already and when looking at the photo's a couple of composites have had me thinking it was me who was wrong and it was the same person. I feel like a need a section in composite faces along side the paul and faul ones.
Well, I'm sure that's what TPTB are trying to do - confuse the issue. To me, the fact that photo tampering has been going is highly suspicious & just reinforces my strongly held belief that "they" have something to hide.

oh and there's a load of signed original faul pictures on this site, like pics of actual photographs of him out and about don't know if they're any use to anyone.
Great! Thanks :)

BTW, I just ordered

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51F4Egfx99L._SS500_.jpg

I hope the photos haven't been doctored! :-P

[humito]

omg.........paul is smoking with his right hand pre 1966!!!! lol he does that after 1966 and is accused of being an imposter ..lol:)

[faulconandsnowjob]

I think it was the way Faul crossed his arms that was pointed out more than the smoking. Even I can smoke ambidextrously.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulinshorts.jpg

[theweetoon]

This thread rocks :) greetings to "happy easter" and all

[truthseeker49]

Paul, trying to make himself appear taller:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/teatime.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/thumbs3.jpg
This photo seems to tell a story:
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/crowd_pool.jpg
Paul is barefoot & up on the sidewalk. George & Johnny are purposely standing half on & half off of the curb. Now why, pray tell, would they be doing that ???
Was it to make themselves shorter, so as to hide Paul's height ?
Paul appears to be explaining the situation to all who were there. The young girl in the photo has a mock surprised look on her face, as if she was just made privey to a "big" secret.... :o
JPM did NOT like being 5 ft 8 in. tall. Those close to him were very aware of this fact. 8-)
Faulhttp://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/beatlesm17.jpg
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/purple.jpg
Paulhttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/niceheightcomparison.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v462/OnlyBeatles/lookatBillandGeorgeshoulders.jpgFaul

Faul is a bigger guy ALLLLL around...

Faulcon is right. Most people can smoke ambidextrously. Although for me, I'd have to say that I wouldn't feel comfortable doing so "lefty". The thing is, Paul was a very busy guy. He was always writing something or doing something important with his "left" hand. So, it makes sense that he would use his non-dominant ( right ) hand for easy tasks such as holding a cigarette & sometimes even a glass.

[faulconandsnowjob]

There's a big height difference btw Paul & Ringo & Faul & Ringo.

[dream9]

Paul was also bow-legged where Faul was/is not.

[hugolast]

omg.........paul is smoking with his right hand pre 1966!!!! lol he does that after 1966 and is accused of being an imposter ..lol:)


true, but being in a restaurant he might be drinking or something, when i smoke and drink i put the drink in my dominant hand, the thing is with this picture you can't tell as his left is covered he might be smoking two cigarettes ;)

[accuracy]

Excellent response, Faulcon. Come & check out my forum, liltroofer. It will definitely further open your eyes & mind !

Yes an excellent site to check out.

Please visit it.

:)

[accuracy]

This thread rocks :) greetings to "happy easter" and all

A huge thanks to the contributors of this thread .

XXXX

[accuracy]

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h297/2003echo/nEWpid.jpg


http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1


http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1


http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1

[accuracy]

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h297/2003echo/nEWpid.jpg


http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1


http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1


http://only1rad.proboards62.com/index.cgi?board=faker&action=display&thread=1073&page=1


Just a little bump. :)

[truthseeker49]

Accuracy, thank you so much for promoting my forum. You have me blushing ! :o
You know that I take all of this very seriously. It has become a huge part of my life. No small feat, considering the fact that I am the mother of four. My youngest is severly disabled and trying to find time for this can be tricky at times.:D

Here's a photo of my Angel:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/Harv027.jpg

[coco]

Bless your heart Truthseeker. *hugs*

[truthseeker49]

Thanks, Coco. Taking care of her can be challenging at times, but she is well worth it. Her smile will melt your heart. :D

[hunter77]

more to the point bono is still alive. there truely is no god:rolleyes:

[accuracy]

Accuracy, thank you so much for promoting my forum. You have me blushing ! :o
You know that I take all of this very seriously. It has become a huge part of my life. No small feat, considering the fact that I am the mother of four. My youngest is severly disabled and trying to find time for this can be tricky at times.:D

Here's a photo of my Angel:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/Harv027.jpg

You brought on tears in my eyes after seeing
that pic of a beautiful girl with a smile that melts anyone!!!

You have every right to be a proud Mum, truthseeker49.

Accuracy:)

[accuracy]

.........still sobbing.................

[onourwayto2012]

Looks like a real sweetheart seeker49!!!.... and interesting bass on the wall there