Paul McCartney is dead.

[astrochicken]

Actually i quite like the rockstar /used car salesman comparison.
Of course for all you PIA'ers they're the same person, for us with the rudiments
of "menschenkenntnis" it's obviously two entirely different people, visual differences aside, who are and act totally different. I have yet to see a picture
of Faul even pretending to be masculine.. being effeminate does appear to come naturally to him as shown here in dozens of photographs of fake poses, dress sense etc.

As regards the jaw-thing that Faul does... here's a impersonator who really
hams faul's twitch through the roof.

Paul McCartney Goodbye, White Album Outtake by Stevie Riks (MrSTEVIERIKS) - YouTube

[ar20]

It's easy to find unflattering pictures of Paul in any era.

What does it prove.

Nothing except:

That I'm trying to be funny, and Faulcon can't help herself. ;)


http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/2452/rockstr1.jpg

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/5467/rockstar2j.jpg


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/huh.gif


http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/joker-heath-ledger.jpg

And I thought, MY FADES were bad...

[ar20]

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7728/faulintopaul.gif
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3959/faulintopaul2.gif

Mirroring images proves, absolutely...

JACK SHIT

[ar20]

Well it looked similar in the quick glance I gave it, but as has been said, just because you don't see him do it doesn't mean he's not capable of it -- anyone can move their jaw to the side. Or maybe he "learnt" to do it over time as part of improving his breathing whilst singing -- very important for singers not to damage their vocal cords.

PiA logic overload.

What singing teacher teaches a pupil...

"Okay, if you want to have better breath control, swing your jaw to the side like you've had an Ecstacy Tablet or a few lines of Charlie, you'll be able to take more air in that way."

[ar20]

Since when does "THEY didn't look the part" mean Paul was replaced?

It obviously means they weren't dressed 'the part' to be allowed in the restaurant. :rolleyes:

Boy, you're really scraping the barrel with this crap!

Unbelievable!

Did you even read the full sentence?

He just happened to go to an airport without a passport and suitcase, mingled with customs to get in saying he was Paul McCartney then wasn't allowed in because he "didn't look the part".

I don't know about you but "didn't look the part" means Faulcon and you are both right, it could be either -- we don't know.

Although, in the context of the sentence... does that mean customs let McCartney and Evans through like scruffy jakes? I mean, what do you have to wear in the 60's to not get into a restauraunt? If he convinced customs he was Paul McCartney, why couldn't he convince a restauraunt to let him in?

Surely if Paul McCartney appeared at a restauraunt door, they wouldn't turn a BEATLE away based on what he was wearing? He was a millionaire and super-famous, he could walk up to that restaurunt naked and walk in.

So you have a story here, where the famous world-travelled and reknowned Paul McCartney, just happened to stumble into an airport with no passport or luggage, flew to france and didn't get into a restauraunt.

But like I said, you can take it to mean what you think as well. Logic above though, suggests otherwise.

No doubt you'll just skip my post and babble on about something else, but it's here for all to see. Anyone with common sense will get what is meant by the context of it.

Oh, and let's not forget the end of it ... the super rich Beatle took no money with him and couldn't pay the bill.

How HIGH do you have to be to try and get through an airport, over to France, into a restauraunt and NOT pay for anything while being a millionaire?

The same goes for your interpretation of the Wired article, further proving you have no idea what the hell you're going on about.

[fireman]

great comps everybody (that includes ar20)!

Perfect match - same guy!

:cool:

[ar20]

great comps everybody (that includes ar20)!

Perfect match - same guy!

:cool:

Put down the crack pipe, you cannot be serious.

http://chenzhen.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/troglodyte.jpg

[fireman]

Surely if Paul McCartney appeared at a restauraunt door, they wouldn't turn a BEATLE away based on what he was wearing? He was a millionaire and super-famous, he could walk up to that restaurunt naked and walk in.


these where the sixties, crazy hippies were not the most beloved custumers..

[ar20]

these where the sixties, crazy hippies were not the most beloved custumers..

That's your answer?

Crazy hippy or not, who turns down a Beatle at the door?

If he can waltz through customs without a passport then why couldn't he get into a little restauraunt abroad for a bite to eat.

Let's remember, this wasn't the early sixties.

[fireman]

Put down the crack pipe, you cannot be serious.


Ar20, always polite and mature.... :(

[fireman]

That's your answer?

Crazy hippy or not, who turns down a Beatle at the door?

If he can waltz through customs without a passport then why couldn't he get into a little restauraunt abroad for a bite to eat.

Let's remember, this wasn't the early sixties.


yeah, why could he do that? :rolleyes: you are contradicting yourself with that argument, you realize that?

[ar20]

Ar20, always polite and mature.... :(

:( I'm sorry, I just can't take you seriously.

The fades clearly show 2 different people, how many times do I need to explain my position on that? I don't like posting fades and having you sarcastically say "WOW, they're the same person! Thanks!".

They're not.

"Without his guiding hand, the Beatles plunged further into the chaotic Magical Mystery Tour project. As ever, Mal was a crucial element, organising the coach tour that formed the centrepiece of the film, recruiting actors and extras, then flying to Nice with Paul to film the Fool on the Hill sequence.

According to Mal, this trip, as did many, took place on an impulse; without luggage or papers. Paul sailed through immigration with no passport, but they were refused entry to the hotel restaurant because they didn't look the part. They headed off to a nightclub. "We had dinner in my room... The only money we had between us had been spent on clothes, on the understanding that money was to be forwarded from England by the Beatles office. After the first round of drinks... we arranged with the manager for us to get credit."


Refused entry to THE HOTEL RESTAURAUNT, but where allowed to walk into a nightclub and get credit for 2 nights.

That sure makes a lot of sense.

[ar20]

yeah, why could he do that? :rolleyes: you are contradicting yourself with that argument, you realize that?

Did you read the quote?

"Paul sailed through immigration with no passport, but they were refused entry to the hotel restaurant"

and

"McCartney got past customs by saying “You know who I am”, but he and Evans were not allowed into the hotel restaurant in Nice"

Jedi mind trick by Faul.

How did it work in Britain and not in France? :p

It's totally contradictory, think about it.

How does he sail through customs, but can't even get a bite to eat in a hotel restauraunt?

I don't know about you, but for me to get into a restauraunt isn't hard. You just have to wear shoes and a nice shirt, and that's for HIGH END TOP RANGE restauraunts...

Hotel Bars and Restauraunts? I've got in with shorts and trainers and been fine, but hey -- that's me, Joe Nobody. Faul must have looked like an absolute hobo that day if we're basing it on Socrates reasoning.

[formosan termite]

That's your answer?

Crazy hippy or not, who turns down a Beatle at the door?

If he can waltz through customs without a passport then why couldn't he get into a little restauraunt abroad for a bite to eat.

Let's remember, this wasn't the early sixties.


He wouldn't have gotten into Commander's Palace. If you have no coat and tie, you don't get in no matter who you are. I've seen it.

I was around back then. There were many people, including members of my own family, who would have refused to let Paul in just because he was a Beatle. No matter what he was wearing.

Not everyone, especially older people, was wild about the Beatles and so forth.

Ok. I'm done. Go ahead with the response full of insults and foul language.

[seaofgreen]

PiA logic overload.

What singing teacher teaches a pupil...

"Okay, if you want to have better breath control, swing your jaw to the side like you've had an Ecstacy Tablet or a few lines of Charlie, you'll be able to take more air in that way."

Sigh, hence the word "learnt" rather that "taught"; hence the quotes around "learnt" indicating that it if indeed this was the case then it was probably unintentional; and hence the word "maybe" indicating that this is just one possibility of many.

[ar20]

He wouldn't have gotten into Commander's Palace. If you have no coat and tie, you don't get in no matter who you are. I've seen it.

I was around back then. There were many people, including members of my own family, who would have refused to let Paul in just because he was a Beatle. No matter what he was wearing.

Not everyone, especially older people, was wild about the Beatles and so forth.

Ok. I'm done. Go ahead with the response full of insults and foul language.

Yes, because it's just me doing that, right?

How many times have we been called delusional, blind, idiots, stupid, etc.

How many times has Socrates posted that link to the "disease" we have?

Yes, because that isn't incredibly insulting -- I'm simply defending myself from the sarcasm and clear as day insults from your side. Don't sit there and tip-toe round a good point, then call me insulting.

The nerve of people. :rolleyes:

[ar20]

Sigh, hence the word "learnt" rather that "taught"; hence the quotes around "learnt" indicating that it if indeed this was the case then it was probably unintentional; and hence the word "maybe" indicating that this is just one possibility of many.

So after singing for many years, he suddenly, overnight LEARNT the habit of swinging his jaw out to the side? :confused:

He just developed "swinging jaw" unintentionally?

Is anyone else actually reading this, is that meant to make some kind of sense?

[ar20]

Oh, and let me just say again....

HOTEL RESTAURAUNT

[socrates]

Did you even read the full sentence?

He just happened to go to an airport without a passport and suitcase, mingled with customs to get in saying he was Paul McCartney then wasn't allowed in because he "didn't look the part".

Don't misrepresent the quote. It said "THEY" - not "he"!

If the intention was to say 'Faul' wasn't allowed into the restaurant because he didn't look like Paul McCartney, then:

A. Why didn't it just say that?

B. Why was the plural term "they" used, and not the singular, 'he'?

So, was Mal Evan's replaced too? :rolleyes:

I mean, what do you have to wear in the 60's to not get into a restauraunt? If he convinced customs he was Paul McCartney, why couldn't he convince a restauraunt to let him in?

Because certain restauraunts have what is called a 'dress code'.

Airports don't.

Surely if Paul McCartney appeared at a restauraunt door, they wouldn't turn a BEATLE away based on what he was wearing? He was a millionaire and super-famous, he could walk up to that restaurunt [sic] naked and walk in.

*SIGH* :rolleyes:

Anyone who's anyone has been turned away from somewhere at some point.

Matt Damon has reportedly been refused entry to London's premier celebrity flesh-pot Chinawhite, and the Ivy.

Colin Farrell was knocked back from a restaurant in Cape Town due to 'scruffiness'.

Mick Jagger was turned away from Antoine's, New Orlean's grandest eaterie, at the height of the Rolling Stones's fame.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2005/jul/24/features.magazine87

You are clearly talking complete and utter nonsense.

What's the next straw you're going to desperately grasp at?

[ar20]

I'm going to be quite blunt here, the reason most people thnk Paul is dead is because they're either crazy, or they want to make they're friends jelous. There's a lot of proof for and against the silly aging PID theory. I for one am pro PIA. I don't want to start any personal arguments with any PIDer.

Yawn.... Quit the accusations and post some evidence for your "tampering" claims, then.

We've asked you often enough!

Put up or shut up.


So you are speaking on behalf of ALL women when you say 'Faul' is not attractive?

You are freaking unbelievable!

Proof you are talking out of your ass:


Your nonsense never ceases to amaze me, failcon.

This is just yet another example of 'PID World' - you just say something you want to believe and it magically becomes 'true' for you.

Other people live in the real world.

In YOUR opinion!

I've already posted the quotes from various women who still find him attractive.

Are you really this dense?

Typical PID nonsense trying to make something out of nothing.....


AR20 is talking out his arse again.

I guarantee that in TWENTY YEARS from now failcon will still be saying things like this.....

... and posting the same bloody pictures.....

.... and coming out with her stock phrases like "I find it quite disturbing that people can't tell the difference....."

One member here recently posted that he believed Faulcon is an illuminati agent posting here in order to discredit the whole forum. I have to say, I am starting to find that believable.

I'll leave failcon with this quote from "Rachael":

"If you can't see that Paul is still hot after looking at this picture, you need some sort of transfusion." Better get down the transfusion centre then, failcon!

cant believe people believe the Paul McCartney is dead ...He looks the same sounds the same ...you crazy nutters will be telling me the moons made out of cheese soon.
LOONY ALERT
LOONY ALERT
LOL

Pfft, Dont interfere. Like you are someone of authority to tell me not to comment with an opinion. If I know that PID theory is false. Then I'll say it and if you come up with bullshit about disinfo agents. Then I'll speak my mind about that too. If you want to be an idiot about it. Then wear the clothes that fit.

formosan termite shoves PID theories in with Pedophilia and saving the children from the evil PID brainwashing clan:

That is why we do it. Filling people, especially young people with all of these wild, unsupported stories about murder, mind control, pedophilia and so forth causes damage. Real damage. We can't and don't want to suppress views of the PID believers, but we sure want to provide logic, sanity and documentation supporting the PIA side.

...then calls me blind.

Are you saying that that poor fade shows more similarity than these? If so you are blind.

Isn't he the guy that ragged on my fades being pathetic?

I get your points, they are just wrong.

Yes, I agree. That fade was beyond stupid.

This is instructive. It is a poorly done fade,


Don't switch photos to some bad compl Let us stick with the one I posted.

Yes, different lens types can make faces look wider. That is a fact. That is not surprising. I see you still fail to deal with the fades I was talking about. You just provide poorly done fades and talk about those.


Your mental gymnastics and perversion of sense and logic is quite astounding - even for a PIDDER.

You're all hot air.

LORD PRESERVE US FROM THE EVIL PID
Unbelievable!

The word irony is obviously not in your dictionary.

Lord preserve us!


You know why I'm insulting? Apparently because I called you Stevie Wonder and said you should have gone to specsavers...

Are you kidding me? Have you seen the relentlesness of Socrates towards Faulcon?

I've only posted like 15 pages worth of backstuff you guys have said. You can post whatever I've said, I don't really care -- it's clear I'm defending myself.

[ar20]

Don't misrepresent the quote. It said "THEY" - not "he"!

If the intention was to say 'Faul' wasn't allowed into the restaurant because he didn't look like Paul McCartney, then:

A. Why didn't it just say that?

B. Why was the plural term "they" used, and not the singular, 'he'?

So, was Mal Evan's replaced too? :rolleyes:



Because certain restauraunts have what is called a 'dress code'.

Airports don't.


*SIGH* :rolleyes:



You are clearly talking complete and utter nonsense.

What's the next straw you're going to desperately grasp at?

I'll spell it out for you...

PAUL got through customs with no passport or luggage to go to France.

He got into the hotel and was refused service at the HOTEL RESTAURAUNT.

Later on he got into a nightclub and got 2 days worth of credit.

Nightclubs have dress-code too, pat'nah.

Something doesn't add up there. And like I said we don't have the whole story, I'm not basing this ONE little thing on my belief that the guy is dead/replaced here.

[ar20]

I'm going to be quite blunt here, the reason most people thnk Paul is dead is because they're either crazy, or they want to make they're friends jelous. There's a lot of proof for and against the silly aging PID theory. I for one am pro PIA. I don't want to start any personal arguments with any PIDer.

Yawn.... Quit the accusations and post some evidence for your "tampering" claims, then.

We've asked you often enough!

Put up or shut up.


So you are speaking on behalf of ALL women when you say 'Faul' is not attractive?

You are freaking unbelievable!

Proof you are talking out of your ass:


Your nonsense never ceases to amaze me, failcon.

This is just yet another example of 'PID World' - you just say something you want to believe and it magically becomes 'true' for you.

Other people live in the real world.

In YOUR opinion!

I've already posted the quotes from various women who still find him attractive.

Are you really this dense?

Typical PID nonsense trying to make something out of nothing.....


AR20 is talking out his arse again.

I guarantee that in TWENTY YEARS from now failcon will still be saying things like this.....

... and posting the same bloody pictures.....

.... and coming out with her stock phrases like "I find it quite disturbing that people can't tell the difference....."

One member here recently posted that he believed Faulcon is an illuminati agent posting here in order to discredit the whole forum. I have to say, I am starting to find that believable.

I'll leave failcon with this quote from "Rachael":

"If you can't see that Paul is still hot after looking at this picture, you need some sort of transfusion." Better get down the transfusion centre then, failcon!

cant believe people believe the Paul McCartney is dead ...He looks the same sounds the same ...you crazy nutters will be telling me the moons made out of cheese soon.
LOONY ALERT
LOONY ALERT
LOL

Pfft, Dont interfere. Like you are someone of authority to tell me not to comment with an opinion. If I know that PID theory is false. Then I'll say it and if you come up with bullshit about disinfo agents. Then I'll speak my mind about that too. If you want to be an idiot about it. Then wear the clothes that fit.

formosan termite shoves PID theories in with Pedophilia and saving the children from the evil PID brainwashing clan:

That is why we do it. Filling people, especially young people with all of these wild, unsupported stories about murder, mind control, pedophilia and so forth causes damage. Real damage. We can't and don't want to suppress views of the PID believers, but we sure want to provide logic, sanity and documentation supporting the PIA side.

...then calls me blind.

Are you saying that that poor fade shows more similarity than these? If so you are blind.

Isn't he the guy that ragged on my fades being pathetic?

I get your points, they are just wrong.

Yes, I agree. That fade was beyond stupid.

This is instructive. It is a poorly done fade,


Don't switch photos to some bad compl Let us stick with the one I posted.

Yes, different lens types can make faces look wider. That is a fact. That is not surprising. I see you still fail to deal with the fades I was talking about. You just provide poorly done fades and talk about those.


Your mental gymnastics and perversion of sense and logic is quite astounding - even for a PIDDER.

You're all hot air.

LORD PRESERVE US FROM THE EVIL PID
Unbelievable!

The word irony is obviously not in your dictionary.

Lord preserve us!


You know why I'm insulting? Apparently because I called you Stevie Wonder and said you should have gone to specsavers...

Are you kidding me? Have you seen the relentlesness of Socrates towards Faulcon?

I've only posted like 15 pages worth of backstuff you guys have said. You can post whatever I've said, I don't really care -- it's clear I'm defending myself.

[reposted on next-page]

[seaofgreen]

So after singing for many years, he suddenly, overnight LEARNT the habit of swinging his jaw out to the side? :confused:

Yeah, just make it up as you go along -- who said anything about overnight?
The clips were 10 years apart and it's well known that singers change the way they sing over the years.

[socrates]

I'll spell it out for you...

PAUL got through customs with no passport or luggage to go to France.

He got into the hotel and was refused service at the HOTEL RESTAURAUNT.

Later on he got into a nightclub and got 2 days worth of credit.

I'll spell it out for you AGAIN...

If the intention was to say 'Faul' wasn't allowed into the restaurant because he didn't look like Paul McCartney, then:

A. Why didn't it just say that?

B. Why was the plural term "they" used, and not the singular, 'he'?

Nightclubs have dress-code too, pat'nah.

Not all nightclubs have dress codes, 'pat'nah.'


And like I said we don't have the whole story,

Which just goes to show how weak and ridiculous this 'evidence' is.

I'm not basing this ONE little thing on my belief that the guy is dead/replaced here.

No, you're basing your belief on equally weak and nonsensical 'evidence'.

We're already aware of that.

[the squire of gothos]

I'll spell it out for you...

PAUL got through customs with no passport or luggage to go to France.

He got into the hotel and was refused service at the HOTEL RESTAURAUNT.

Later on he got into a nightclub and got 2 days worth of credit.

Nightclubs have dress-code too, pat'nah.

Something doesn't add up there. And like I said we don't have the whole story, I'm not basing this ONE little thing on my belief that the guy is dead/replaced here.


I'll spell it out for you.
I R R E L E V A N T ! ! ! !

[amethyst2009]

After watching the Beatles night on BBC2 last night, I am positive that PM is PM , and always has been.

[socrates]

After watching the Beatles night on BBC2 last night, I am positive that PM is PM , and always has been.

Yes, indeed.

It's quite clear to anybody who isn't gullible enough to fall for a 40 year old hoax.

[the squire of gothos]

Back on topic.


Question for Faulcon:


When the "Powers That Be" were downloading Paul's mind in to Faul's brain, did they remove Paul's hands from his corpse and attach them to Faul?


Because even 40 years or so apart, their hands are exactly the same.

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/242aaaf7549f.jpg

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/vantola64.jpg[/quote]


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/handcomp2.gif






Here is Paul Playing Piano in '64 and '67, followed by close ups of what looks like the same hand. Notice the same odd technique of playing chords without using the thumb.


http://img83.exs.cx/img83/5789/64-piano.jpg http://img83.exs.cx/img83/7149/67-piano.jpg

http://img83.exs.cx/img83/5797/64-right-hand.jpghttp://img83.exs.cx/img83/3533/67-right-hand.jpg

The overlay fade clearly shows that this is the same hand. :D
http://img13.exs.cx/img13/2308/hand_fade.gif


Now for the bass. This little comparison clearly shows that not only did Paul's hand shape and size remain consistant throughout his lifetime, but more importantly his hand technique, which like a fingerprint, is unique to each musician changes NOT ONE BIT throughout his entire lifetime.

http://img84.exs.cx/img84/4908/handofpaul3nx.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

Left Ear
http://img18.exs.cx/img18/1858/dez3.jpg
http://img18.exs.cx/img18/2725/goodnighttonight.jpg


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/leftearcomp-1.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/ear.gif


Right Ear

http://img42.exs.cx/img42/5940/earcompare1.jpg

http://img58.exs.cx/img58/3893/ear.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/earcomp.gif

[ivgg]

formosan termite shoves PID theories in with Pedophilia and saving the children from the evil PID brainwashing clan:



...then calls me blind.



Isn't he the guy that ragged on my fades being pathetic?













LORD PRESERVE US FROM THE EVIL PID



You know why I'm insulting? Apparently because I called you Stevie Wonder and said you should have gone to specsavers...

Are you kidding me? Have you seen the relentlesness of Socrates towards Faulcon?

I've only posted like 15 pages worth of backstuff you guys have said. You can post whatever I've said, I don't really care -- it's clear I'm defending myself.

[reposted on next-page]


The reason why we're talking like this is because it's hard to take PID'ers serious.

[fireman]

Who are you, "Ar20", to care, what another user said about Faulconandsnowjob?

And what does that have to do with me? You are the one who gets all heated up calling me a "cunt", an "idiot", "stupid", and a "crack junkie".. :confused:

That's how someone acts, who isn't that sure about his postion after all..

:(

[astrochicken]

Squire of goth, yet another *newbie*, pulling out old pics from the PIA garbage bin.

So, the hands and the ears look the same to you in the images you just posted eh? Are you serious?


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/handcomp2.gif

That's too fuzzy even for my liking. To me it's just a hand. Take a blurry pic of your hand and size it to the right size and dimensions of that pic and it'd look the same.


Now for the bass. This little comparison clearly shows that not only did Paul's hand shape and size remain consistant throughout his lifetime, but more importantly his hand technique, which like a fingerprint, is unique to each musician changes NOT ONE BIT throughout his entire lifetime.


You're obviously not a musician....with the exception of possibly jeff beck's guitar and john entwistle's bass .. there is no "fingerprint", especially not as regards pauls/fauls bass playing. A wee tad more melodic than was the norm at the time but that was it.


Left ear
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/leftearcomp-1.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/ear.gif
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/earcomp.gif



Sorry, but just looking at the ears, i see two totally different earlobes on two totally different ears.



Look, here's an easy one.

First image is kevin spacey from the front and with hair, the second one
is kevin spacey from the side AND BALD.

Funny thing is, they both look like kevin spacey regardless of camera lens, perspective / light / angle / facial expression. You can see that right?

http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/original/kevin-spacey-2.jpg
http://lifeafterwcg2.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/supermanreturns017.jpg



Well it looked similar in the quick glance I gave it, but as has been said, just because you don't see him do it doesn't mean he's not capable of it -- anyone can move their jaw to the side. Or maybe he "learnt" to do it over time as part of improving his breathing whilst singing -- very important for singers not to damage their vocal cords.


As regards the *jaw* thing.. that is entirely a faul TWITCH which pretty much DID happen over night funnily enough... i'm assuming that FAUL allways had that twitch even pre-faul.


LOL, we've established you're not a musician, after that quote i can safely assume you're also not a singer... funny how he only chews cud like a cow when he's doing slow songs eh?.. *IF* it improves breathing one would assume that it's during fast songs, with lots of lyrics and at the top of his range.. but no.. it's on the slow dirgy ballads.

LOL "Improve their breathing".. where are you from??? ROFLMAO :P


As regards the jaw-thing that Faul does... here's a impersonator who really
hams faul's twitch through the roof.

http://www.youtube.com/v/_Uy_l_75As8

[faulconandsnowjob]

Paul & Faul have the same hands? Funny, b/c they obviously don't have the same feet. Bill has some jacked-up feet:

http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/Billandmartha13.jpg

http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/paul_coconut.jpghttp://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/hideinthepool.jpg

http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/los3-2.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

And b/c I know how much Focrates loves my rockstar/used car salesman comps:

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/26.jpg

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/brdst6.jpg

I think some of you are just a little Menschenkenntnis-challenged :p

[seaofgreen]

LOL "Improve their breathing".. where are you from??? ROFLMAO :P
From the world where if you search google for improve singing breathing, it comes up with a shed-load of hits.

What world are you from -- cloud cuckoo land?

[astrochicken]

From the world where if you search google for improve singing breathing, it comes up with a shed-load of hits.

What world are you from -- cloud cuckoo land?



Oh yeah, right.. i forgot Paul couldn't sing.

[seaofgreen]

And b/c I know how much Focrates loves my rockstar/used car salesman comps:

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/26.jpg

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/brdst6.jpg

So the "salesman" is the one in the jacket, and the rock star's the one in front the mic... so what?

[the squire of gothos]

Wow. It's like talking to a chunk of wood.

[the squire of gothos]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/jpmsplotch.gif

[fireman]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/jpmsplotch.gif


hahaha!! very cool!

:D

[seaofgreen]

As regards the *jaw* thing.. that is entirely a faul TWITCH which pretty much DID happen over night funnily enough...

Care to enlighten us as to the evidence for this then?

[seaofgreen]

Look, here's an easy one.

First image is kevin spacey from the front and with hair, the second one
is kevin spacey from the side AND BALD.

Funny thing is, they both look like kevin spacey regardless of camera lens, perspective / light / angle / facial expression. You can see that right?


Your pics have the same expression.
Unlike most PID pics, they're fairly high quality.
They're not of a man in his 20s.

Waste of time.

[the squire of gothos]

Care to enlighten us as to the evidence for this then?

Why waste all that time doing boring, painstaking research when you can just make up wild theories based on a series of unrelated photos.

It take time to find things like this:

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/math-1.gif


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/expressions-1.jpg


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/flash.gif

[socrates]

Failcon and co. believe all the Beatles were replaced, and George Martin and Eric Clapton and Mark Hamill and Elvis and Sly Stalone and Condi Rice and....

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_26.jpg
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_27a.jpg
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_28a.jpg

http://only1rad.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=gonebutnotforgotten

The only thing which has been replaced here is their sense of reality.

[magnolia_xx]

This explains many things...

[the squire of gothos]

It's amazing that so many of us (about 99.9999%) are so blind that we can't see that everyone was replaced. ;d

[seaofgreen]

Failcon and co. believe all the Beatles were replaced, and George Martin and Eric Clapton and Mark Hamill and Elvis and Sly Stalone and Condi Rice and....


I wonder who is doing all the replacements though? I bet it's the same evildoers who replace all the tadpoles with frogs...

[the squire of gothos]

OK. We're ready for our next series of unrelated photos.

[fireman]

:eek:....:rolleyes:

Failcon and co. believe all the Beatles were replaced, and George Martin and Eric Clapton and Mark Hamill and Elvis and Sly Stalone and Condi Rice and....

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_26.jpg
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_27a.jpg
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_28a.jpg

http://only1rad.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=gonebutnotforgotten

The only thing which has been replaced here is their sense of reality.

[formosan termite]

Failcon and co. believe all the Beatles were replaced, and George Martin and Eric Clapton and Mark Hamill and Elvis and Sly Stalone and Condi Rice and....

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_26.jpg
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_27a.jpg
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_28a.jpg

http://only1rad.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=gonebutnotforgotten

The only thing which has been replaced here is their sense of reality.

This exemplifies the PID thinking. Everyone is replaced.:rolleyes: All of these people, with all of those family and friends. It means thousands that would have to be involved in the cover-ups. And NOT ONE speaks out or leaks? And don't give me the old "they fear for their lives" crud. Many people each day put their lives on the line to do the right thing. And someone, with nothing left to lose, on a death bed, would have come clean.

And by the way, where is Eric Clapton's name? We all heard about Feric. LOL!

[formosan termite]

i wonder who is doing all the replacements though? I bet it's the same evildoers who replace all the tadpoles with frogs...

lol! Masterpiece.

[formosan termite]

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/jpmsplotch.gif

Hey! Those two pictures are of the same guy.

That was great PIA evidence given by faulcon.

[formosan termite]

I'll spell it out for you...

PAUL got through customs with no passport or luggage to go to France.

He got into the hotel and was refused service at the HOTEL RESTAURAUNT.

Later on he got into a nightclub and got 2 days worth of credit.

Nightclubs have dress-code too, pat'nah.

Something doesn't add up there. And like I said we don't have the whole story, I'm not basing this ONE little thing on my belief that the guy is dead/replaced here.

Not all nightclubs have dress codes.

FOSAFSN!

Who cares? We don't even know why he was refused. Are we to believe that he was refused because some obscure restaurant owner in a foreign country who never ever met Paul thought he didn't look enough like 'pre '67 Paul?

Give me a break.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Look at that hook nose on Bill

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/faul_3-4.jpg

Paul didn't have a beak like that

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/edsul64sr2.jpg

[formosan termite]

formosan termite shoves PID theories in with Pedophilia and saving the children from the evil PID brainwashing clan:



...then calls me blind.



Isn't he the guy that ragged on my fades being pathetic?













LORD PRESERVE US FROM THE EVIL PID



You know why I'm insulting? Apparently because I called you Stevie Wonder and said you should have gone to specsavers...

Are you kidding me? Have you seen the relentlesness of Socrates towards Faulcon?

I've only posted like 15 pages worth of backstuff you guys have said. You can post whatever I've said, I don't really care -- it's clear I'm defending myself.

[reposted on next-page]

I did nothing that you did not do to me first. The stuff I posted about the pidders accusations of pedophilia and scaring young people are true. That is all well documented over the past 6 years. That is not an insult, it is merely presenting the truth of has been said.

And faulcon has dished it out as well. I went way back and found faulcon telling PIAers to Shut the F*CK up. People responded in kind.

[astrochicken]

Failcon and co. believe all the Beatles were replaced, and George Martin and Eric Clapton and Mark Hamill and Elvis and Sly Stalone and Condi Rice and....


I don't. Paul McCartney was definitely replaced though.



As regards the jaw.. even comedians take the piss of faul's "i'm a cow chewing cud" jaw movement (so he can breathe better LOL).

STEVIE RIKS Paul McCartney Makes A Cup Of Tea The Original . - YouTube

I honestly haven't seen any footage of paul doing it.

[the squire of gothos]

Look at that hook nose on Bill

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/faul_3-4.jpg


Look at everything on Paul. History repeats itself. :)

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/FAILCON.gif

[formosan termite]

Look at that hook nose on Bill

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/faul_3-4.jpg

Paul didn't have a beak like that

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/edsul64sr2.jpg

You do really work hard to find the absolute worst quality photos for your comps.

But noses do change with age. See my links to the plastic surgeon sites. The cartilage stretches and droops due to gravity. Well known. Well documented. Don't take my word for it. Research it for yourselves.

[socrates]

Look at that hook nose on Bill

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/faul_3-4.jpg

Paul didn't have a beak like that

LOL!

My, Look at this hook nose on PAUL:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/MTB10.jpg

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/show-case/faul_3-4.jpghttp://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/x11.jpg

Same 'hooky nose' - same man. :rolleyes:

[socrates]

The cartilage stretches and droops due to gravity.

"Ah, but Paul would never allow gravity to make his nose droop."

:D

[faulconandsnowjob]

... Killing Lennon was only the first step. All that he signified must be defaced. That was the principle objective of Walrus. His diaries were stolen and returned later with extra entries and some entries altered...

http://www.articlesbase.com/journalism-articles/covert-war-on-rock-by-alex-constantine-summary-514622.html


I wonder which diary entries were altered? The ones about Paul/Faul, maybe?

[faulconandsnowjob]

Paul's Left-Handedness


One of the big areas of controversy in the Paul is Dead conspiracy is which is his dominant hand - is he a leftie or a rightie? Paul is one of the most famous left-handed guitarists in the world and, in fact, in a 1963 interview Paul is quoted as saying the following about it (emphasis is mine)...

"The only thing I couldn't cure myself of was being left-handed. I do everything with my left hand, and no matter how I try I can't change the habit. I just seem to do everything back to front. I used to even write backwards. Every time the schoolmasters would look at my handwriting they would throw swinging fits."

Paul McCartney


Here is Paul himself, in his own words and before his alleged death, telling us that he is a devout leftie and that everything he does is with his left hand.

Why is it then that in spite of this, there are a number of occurances after 1966 where Paul is picking up and/or holding objects with his right hand? Being a leftie myself, my dominant hand performs such tasks, i.e. my left, and because Paul has also admitted to being the same then his dominant, left hand should be the one seen doing such things.

But there are a number of times after 1966 where he is shown in Beatle material doing something that is right-handed. These include:

On page 4 of the Magical Mystery Tour booklet Paul is holding his wand in his right hand.

At the beginning of the 'Fool on the Hill' segment in the Magical Mystery Tour movie Paul takes the cigarette out of his mouth using his right hand.

In the Magical Mystery Tour movie, as the cast are getting drunk and singing on the bus Paul is shown holding his beer bottle in his right hand.

In the music video for Penny Lane, Paul appears to take his bass guitar to hold right-handed before quickly correcting himself.

On the cover of Abbey Road Paul is holding his cigarette in his right hand.

In the booklet for Let It Be... Naked a photo is shown of Paul holding a cup of tea in his right hand.

On the Anthology 7 video, as Paul is discussing the song 'I Will' clips are shown of their time in India. Two clips show during this that shows Paul playing right-handed guitar...

http://homepages.tesco.net/harbfamily/opd/left.html

[supertzar]

So do righties never use their left hand for anything?

[the squire of gothos]

So do righties never use their left hand for anything?

Not in a world where everyone was replaced. :D

Must be he was already replaced here:

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc315/JamesPaulMcCartneyMohin/1185856154_f.jpg

[seaofgreen]

Oh yeah, right.. i forgot Paul couldn't sing.

LOL! So in astrochicken's cartoon world, being able to sing is binary: either you can or you can't! There's no technique involved -- nothing that could improve or change over a 10 year period. Musicians just love performing 10 year old material and have exactly the same emotional attachment to a 10 year old song as the day the first performed it. They never perceive flaws in their old performances and studiously look through old footage to make sure their latest performance is a carbon copy!

The real world however is not like the Simpsons -- people actually grow up and mature. (Okay, maybe not pidders.)

[astrochicken]

LOL! So in astrochicken's cartoon world, being able to sing is binary: either you can or you can't! There's no technique involved -- nothing that could improve or change over a 10 year period. Musicians just love performing 10 year old material and have exactly the same emotional attachment to a 10 year old song as the day the first performed it. They never perceive flaws in their old performances and studiously look through old footage to make sure their latest performance is a carbon copy!

The real world however is not like the Simpsons -- people actually grow up and mature. (Okay, maybe not pidders.)



Do you think before typing?


So *paul* grew up and matured by developing a "cow chewing cud" jaw motion. That's your response to that is it?

In order to rectify flaws in old performances his jaw went freelance?????
ummm... ok.

The whole in which hand he holds a teapot or a coffee mug debate is ridiculous.... *Faul* playing guitar right-handed however is not.

[seaofgreen]

Do you think before typing?
Which bit do you have a problem with?


So *paul* grew up and matured by developing a "cow chewing cud" jaw motion. That's your response to that is it?

I neither know nor care what singing habits PM may or may not have developed by 1976, ten years after he was supposedly replaced. OTOH, you've also claimed that he developed this habit overnight -- so perhaps you'd like to show us some evidence from late 66/early 67 to support this?

[pipsicle]

Did you see the Beatles documentaries on Saturday night? Especially the one of the Beatles first US tour, by Albert Maysles. Those boys loved each other, and then became completely miserable in 1966. Look how much Paul and John are enjoying singing in harmony.

One fascinating feature was their second appearance on the Ed Sullivan show, during which they performed "This Boy" and "From Me to You". If you see 0.34 - o.45min, it's clearly not Ringo on the drums.

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Later the stand-in would actually stand next to Ed Sullivan, and still the screaming fans did not appear to notice.

[the squire of gothos]

Do you think before typing?


So *paul* grew up and matured by developing a "cow chewing cud" jaw motion. That's your response to that is it?

In order to rectify flaws in old performances his jaw went freelance?????
ummm... ok.



Just another James Paul McCartney mannerism that remained consistant throughout his life.

http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7133/cud1s.jpg




http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1231/cudn.jpg

[socrates]

One fascinating feature was their second appearance on the Ed Sullivan show, during which they performed "This Boy" and "From Me to You". If you see 0.34 - o.45min, it's clearly not Ringo on the drums.

Later the stand-in would actually stand next to Ed Sullivan, and still the screaming fans did not appear to notice.

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/5237/screenhunter27.jpg

Not Ringo? :eek:

Welcome back pipsicle....... back with more absolute nonsense. :(

[formosan termite]

Did you see the Beatles documentaries on Saturday night? Especially the one of the Beatles first US tour, by Albert Maysles. Those boys loved each other, and then became completely miserable in 1966. Look how much Paul and John are enjoying singing in harmony.



This is no surprise. They even talked extensively about it. They were constantly traveling and constantly under pressure to produce new albums. They had no time to rehearse and the performances suffered. The crowds of screaming fans had them couped up in hotel rooms like virtual prisoners. Then there was the disaster in the Philippines. They were stressed, tired and sick of it all after three years of Beatlemania.

There is a saying "familiarity breeds contempt." There is truth in that phrase. I was in a band with friends Initially we were all like brothers, but in a year's time half the band quit and we were not even on speaking terms. And we had nothing like the pressure and stress the Beatles were under.

[formosan termite]

Just another James Paul McCartney mannerism that remained consistant throughout his life.

http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7133/cud1s.jpg




http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1231/cudn.jpg

LOL! Well, Trelane, this is just another example of the pidders' great research and attention to detail. Just like the "Paul had brown eyes," "Paul didn't have freckles," "Paul never showed green eyes," and so forth. They just make this stuff up without even doing any simple research to see if they are right. They have no credibility left.

[astrochicken]

LOL! Well, Trelane, this is just another example of the pidders' great research and attention to detail. Just like the "Paul had brown eyes," "Paul didn't have freckles," "Paul never showed green eyes," and so forth. They just make this stuff up without even doing any simple research to see if they are right. They have no credibility left.

That's it????

C'mon.. at least find a pre-66 Paul twitch video... on you go.. find one!!!!

Take the challenge.

[dedesuperman]

LOL! Well, Trelane, this is just another example of the pidders' great research and attention to detail. Just like the "Paul had brown eyes," "Paul didn't have freckles," "Paul never showed green eyes," and so forth. They just make this stuff up without even doing any simple research to see if they are right. They have no credibility left.

Here has a difference because the shown picture is a photo compared to those that I show that is the screen cap took from videos in which we are witness of the movement of his jaw while with a photo we can possibly tampered. Sorry but Faul has this kind of twitch who Paul doesn't have. Show me a video when Paul makes the same movement of the jaw precisely as the one that we sees when Faul did in the video of Yesterday 66-76. I don't believe that you go to find some.

Unfortunately the real Paul is dead!

http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7133/cud1s.jpg

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Faulsjaw-1.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

That's it????

C'mon.. at least find a pre-66 Paul twitch video... on you go.. find one!!!!

Take the challenge.

We've made our case. And destroyed yours.

We only take orders from the "Powers That Be"


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/funhouse/macca_colors.gif

[astrochicken]

We've made our case. And destroyed yours.

We only take orders from the "Powers That Be"


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/funhouse/macca_colors.gif


*sigh* if that keeps you happy.


Formosan's really the only one actually worth trying to talk to out of you lot.
No case has been made. Nothing has been destroyed and nothing has been debunked.


We have a talentless, uncharismatic, effeminate even poofy, pretentious individual with a twitch of his jaw not unlike a cow chewing cud.. hundreds of visual disparities and a fairly obvious contempt amongst the beatles themselves from 66/67 onwards.

Sorry, if you can't see it through your "macca is god" sunglasses but the guy you idolize is not the same man that wrote hundreds of really crafty ditties and bordered on genius.

Give me hope of deliverance, please.

[the squire of gothos]

That's some funny shit.

[fireman]

:)


Well, with this kind of "evidence", i wonder how they came up with the "truth" about all the other replacements that Faulcon & her little detective crew "found out" about:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_26.jpghttp://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_27a.jpg

:D

[dedesuperman]

We've made our case. And destroyed yours.

We only take orders from the "Powers That Be"


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/funhouse/macca_colors.gif

In the beginning Faul didn't have the same look and Paul's mannerisms and during the years to look more like Paul he had plastic surgeries and he worked more and more to have Paul's mannerism but he dragged with him his bad twicht
Faul can imitate Paul but he cannot change his bad twicht when he have one like a cow chewing cud. :D

[socrates]

Nothing has been destroyed and nothing has been debunked.

LOL!

Just 3 quick examples of the nonsense we've debunked from you and your fellow PIDDERS:


Add this one to the list of differences: Faul's freckles. This is where they're located on his face:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FaulConstellation.jpg

Paul didn't have those freckles.


Lol!

Yes he does.....

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%203/82202321.jpg http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/2967/copyofbigbrowneyes2.jpg

Paul had brown eyes.

This disinfo has been exposed previously, yet you still brazenly peddle it as fact.

It's clearly not:

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3824/1paulbookhx8.jpg http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/9052/2paulbook1vu6.jpg

Paul has HAZEL eyes - FACT.

And who could forget your ridiculous claim that Paul "never" looked down at the neck of his guitar, but 'Faul' does?

Paul knew the instrument inside out and KNEW where his finger are and thus never looks at the neck *to find the dots* Go watch.


What a load of absolute nonsense...

http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/4049/74334882.jpg

http://img60.imageshack.us/img60/6206/85400408.jpg

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7585/40460282.jpg

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/5042/c15.jpg

Nothing has been debunked.

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

[socrates]

In the beginning Faul didn't have the same look and Paul's mannerisms and during the years to look more like Paul he had plastic surgeries and he worked more and more to have Paul's mannerism but he dragged with him his bad twicht
Faul can imitate Paul but he cannot change his bad twicht when he have one like a cow chewing cud. :D

A good theory is always underminded by lack of proof. :rolleyes:

Any surgery scar photos you can show us from 1966/7, for example?

No? Thought not.

Poor Humito has been patiently waiting for months for Failcon to post these photos she promised.

Guess he's in for the mother of all waits.

[fireman]

In the beginning Faul didn't have the same look and Paul's mannerisms and during the years to look more like Paul he had plastic surgeries and he worked more and more to have Paul's mannerism but he dragged with him his bad twicht
:D

Really?

Funny... Let's look at some comps with pics from 1967.. only month after the "replacement" took place...


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/P45.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/pp12_fade_still.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/6667-1.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfectcomp.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/1-1.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/4.gif


http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/67comp.gif


The Paul you call Faul looks just like himself 1967!!

:rolleyes:

[fireman]

great post:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1251282&postcount=3080

:)

[toty1994]

No case has been made. Nothing has been destroyed and nothing has been debunked.

Simply astounding. The above statement makes me think that maybe it's time to leave the PiD believers to themselves and just let them get on with it. It might be fun pointing out the flaws in their arguments but, clearly, it's always going to be a waste of time. What's the point anymore, really?

[faulconandsnowjob]

There are some interesting comps at http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/index.html. For example, this one:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faux_vivian_stanshall_faux_paul_mc_.jpg

I could see how the one on the left could've been turned into the one on the right.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/disguises_3.jpg

I had wondered why Bill needed a fake mustache, but if he's naturally light-haired, then it would make sense.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/FaulTruthMoustache.gif

It's definitely not Paul, though.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/PM7-FA16x20Paul-McCartney-Portrait-.jpg

[seaofgreen]

:eek: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse:
There are some interesting comps at http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/index.html. For example, this one:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faux_vivian_stanshall_faux_paul_mc_.jpg

I could see how the one on the left could've been turned into the one on the right.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/disguises_3.jpg

[toty1994]

There are some interesting comps at http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/index.html. For example, this one:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/faux_vivian_stanshall_faux_paul_mc_.jpg

I could see how the one on the left could've been turned into the one on the right.

Despite my last post I can't help responding to this as it's so funny. Vivian Stanshall (on the left) continued working long after his Bonzo Dog days. He died in 1995 and his last tv appearance was as his 'Sir Henry Rawlinson' character in an advert for 'Ruddles Real Ale' the year before. Ironically he was an alcoholic and in poor health for years. I don't think he's your 'Faul'...and anyway, if anything he bears a closer resemblence to Lennon in that photo. Maybe he was Lennon's replacement (after all, there was a Fohn too according to you) :rolleyes:

[socrates]

http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/7222/e305acdc9be911de9160dde.jpg

[ar20]

http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/7222/e305acdc9be911de9160dde.jpg

You know.... at times this does seem to detract from the real points we bring up.

But what's hilarious is, if I fade that face into Faul I'll bet there's a LOT of similarity...

That's what's so fucked up about it.

[seaofgreen]

Show me a video when Paul makes the same movement of the jaw precisely as the one that we sees when Faul did in the video of Yesterday 66-76. I don't believe that you go to find some.


There are several '66 jaw movements in this video e.g. at roughly 1:11-1:13, just before he sings "came suddenly". If it doesn't meet your "precisely" criterion well maybe it's 'cos the song's tempo is significantly faster in the earlier performance, or that he's more relaxed in the later one, or whatever.

[socrates]

You know.... at times this does seem to detract from the real points we bring up.

But what's hilarious is, if I fade that face into Faul I'll bet there's a LOT of similarity...

That's what's so fucked up about it.

Take a recent photo of Vivian Shantall and try and fade his face into Faul.

Oh, hang on... One is DEAD and the other is very much alive!

Guess this fact escaped you.

That's what's "fucked up" about claiming the two are the same person. :rolleyes:

[ar20]

I've noticed a lot in this topic since I began posting...

You know when the mention of this being debunked comes up, I think of a few things...

If it's so debunked, why is the topic spanned across 2 topics with thousands/hundreds of replies?

If it's so debunked, why in the last month has Letterman, Wired Magazine, and Faul in Reuters and Cilla Black been asked AGAIN about it? It just won't be dropped. He's so alive he keeps getting asked if he's dead.

If it's so debunked, why is it you lot only seem to zone in on the weak points made (freckles, camera lens, does Paul/Faul look at the bass? etc.) run with it, and say game over? By the way, posting 1 example of Paul looking at the bass doesn't weigh up against a few videos from our side showing Faul doing it. Ratio-wise, that isn't a debunking... that's a trumping.

The same goes for skipping over points you believe to be stupid. How is it, I can bring up the fact Paul was clearly a nail-biter then suddenly wasn't, and that's "idiotic"... yet someone else pointed out the fact that he developed another mannerism which was swinging jaw, and you lot STILL call that idiotic.

It makes no sense! This isn't a debate if everything we say is stupid, it's a slandering shit-throwing competition.

I mean, if it was game over -- then it would be, but it isn't. You can't take apart the creme de la creme of our fades and comps or points made, so you make what has to be the most laughable examples ever and then scoff in the corner... and I'm not being insulting here, I'm being honest, there have been a few which have been slap-knee like funny and I can't believe people can't see it.

That's what spins my melon.

Guys, it isn't debunked... it isn't even proven... it's been 40 years and its still up for debate, and more and more it's becoming obvious that we only got the real Paul McCartney for a few years before being replaced by a remarkably talented performer in his own right.

It doesn't excuse the fact that the real Paul McCartney died and it hasn't even been publically acknowledged or accepted. If it wasn't for us he'd be put into the memory hole, so understand -- we serve a purpose here even if you don't want to believe or respect our view.

I make a proposal here to PiA supporters and alike here. This topic can't go on being a "You're stupid. No, YOU'RE STUPID." thread. Let's get some real dialogue here, there must be bigger and better comps we can do, there must be more clues, and there must be more research done. There must be a way for both sides to communicate in a better form, myself included.

Who's up for it?

[ar20]

Take a recent photo of Vivian Shantall and try and fade his face into Faul.

Oh, hang on... One is DEAD and the other is very much alive!

Guess this fact escaped you.

That's what's "fucked up" about claiming the two are the same person. :rolleyes:

I know one is dead. I was just making the point of what Faulcon was actually saying.

The similarity, that's all.

[ar20]

[edited - photos don't work]

[socrates]

Will Failcon be claiming Faul is Pearl Witherington next?

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Or maybe Brian Epstein?

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

Or even Neil Aspinall?

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

ALL of whom have been claimed by PIDDERS to have replaced Paul. :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

And they wonder why people can't take their claims seriously.

[ar20]

Will Failcon be claiming Faul is Pearl Witherington next?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNYch_3Ow7A

Or maybe Brian Epstein?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jASyEomeiEQ

Or even Neil Aspinall?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2An49YTF20

ALL of whom have been claimed by PIDDERS to have replaced Paul. :eek::eek::eek:

And they wonder why people can't take their claims seriously.

This is my point Captain Roll-Eyes. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

They're debating about "Could it have been?" "Could this have happened?" "Was this the case?".

Have any of them actually came out and argued fiercly that Paul was replaced by any of them? NO.

They're doing what we should be doing, debating points.

And it's precisely what I said you're guilty of, you take the weakest points then attempt to deride the conversation and suggest that we can't be trusted because we talk about things like that.

...I'll agree with you though, that part of it is completely screwy and does detract alot from the points that I would call good.

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/3571/faulpaul333.jpg

[socrates]

She'll be claiming Spock replaced Paul next....

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6162/screenhunter21.jpg

[ar20]

She'll be claiming Spock replaced Paul next....

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6162/screenhunter21.jpg

:eek: Fock is ALIVE.

[socrates]

This is my point Captain Roll-Eyes. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

They're debating about "Could it have been?" "Could this have happened?" "Was this the case?".

Er, can you read?

The videos are titled "SAME PERSON". Do you see a question mark? That is not a question - it is a claim.

Have any of them actually came out and argued fiercly that Paul was replaced by any of them? NO.

They have uploaded a video to youtube claiming they are the same person - hence the title of "same person". :rolleyes:

...I'll agree with you though, that part of it is completely screwy and does detract alot from the points that I would call good.

I agree with the first part.

[socrates]

:eek: Fock is ALIVE.

Oh, I forgot. Spock has been replaced too, right? :D

[ar20]

Er, can you read?

The videos are titled "SAME PERSON". Do you see a question mark? That is not a question - it is a claim.



They have uploaded a video to youtube claiming they are the same person - hence the title of "same person". :rolleyes:



I agree with the first part.

Disinfo much?.

That's how I see them. Unless someone is being serious, but like I said -- people using that to chasm our points are genius.

[formosan termite]

Simply astounding. The above statement makes me think that maybe it's time to leave the PiD believers to themselves and just let them get on with it. It might be fun pointing out the flaws in their arguments but, clearly, it's always going to be a waste of time. What's the point anymore, really?

The point is to be here for the people new to PID. So they get correct information rather than lies like:

Paul has brown eyes.

Hazel eyes can never look green.

Faul's hair always went from right to left.

Paul McCartney did not have freckles

"Faul" has some strange jaw movement that Paul NEVER did.


All of these have been debunked. Will these hard core pidders be convinced? Probably never. They are invested in their beliefs. We are here for the fense sitters and the open minded. We are here to make sure people get all the facts, not the made up stories.

[faulconandsnowjob]

What's going on here, basically, is info-warfare. Some of us are trying to reveal some information that some other people would rather keep hidden. I don't take the inults personally. They're just doing their jobs. I get it. They don't want people to actually take a serious look at PID, b/c then they might see that Paul was replaced.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Think it's impossible for a man to pretend to be a woman or vice versa?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/disguises_c.jpg

Who's stupid now?

[faulconandsnowjob]

I think we can safely say that these disguises would have tricked all of the PIA'ers :-P

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/disguises_3.jpg

[humito]

A good theory is always underminded by lack of proof. :rolleyes:

Any surgery scar photos you can show us from 1966/7, for example?

No? Thought not.

Poor Humito has been patiently waiting for months for Failcon to post these photos she promised.

Guess he's in for the mother of all waits.

lol!:D..........YES MATE I AM DIGGING IN!,,,,,,,,,,,THE LONGEST WAIT IN THE HISTORY OF ANYTHING!

[faulconandsnowjob]

Yeah, it's so impossible for a woman to play a man :rolleyes:

... As necessary, more elaborate disguises using full or partial facial masks could perform an ethnic or sex change to alter a person's racial or gender appearance. among the options are padded clothing to alter body type and weight distribution, sculpted appliances that alter eye color, mouth lines, and affect speech tone, makeup and hair coloring, hand and arm "gloves" to match facial coloring, shoe lifts to add height, and torso devices to create a stooped posture. Individually and in combination, the disguise techniques can affect dramatic appearance change.

For officers in need of a disguise subject to close attention and durable for hours or days, OTS specialists would spend several hours performing the transformations. These labor-intensive disguises were typically applied on individuals in high-risk situations, such as illegal border crossings. Given time, the disguise specialists would alter hair color, apply facial hair, modify jaw lines, improvise dental work, create wrinkles, change complexion, or add glasses and warts to match any photographic documents and thus avoid chance recognition at a border crossing or airport checkpoint...


From Wallace, Robert and H. Keith Melton. Spycraft. USA: Dutton, 2008 at 387 - LOOK IT UP!

[fireman]

SPYCRAFT!

GET IT HERE:

Amazon.com: Spycraft Version 2.0 (9781905471898): Alex Flagg, Scott Gearin, Patrick Kapera: Books@@AMEPARAM@@http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ObO2mvt%2BL.@@AMEPARAM@@51ObO2mvt%2BL

:D

[faulconandsnowjob]

I'm not saying Pearl Witherington is "Paul," but I am saying Faul is pretty faggy:

http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/pearl_witherington_cornioley/pearl_witherington_cornioley_female_pose_2.jpg

Paul was not at all faggy, IMO.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/tryingonshirt.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Another incredibly faggy picture of Faul

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/posinginwhite.jpg

Paul was not at all effeminate:

http://img47.photobucket.com/albums/v145/Kissmekatie/Paul_leaning.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

And the faggy pics of Faul just keep coming:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/69chain2.jpg

NOT faggy:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/paulnakedtorsopossiblyaltered.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Faggy Faul

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/olderFaul.jpg

Paul was NOT faggy

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/SCF5467.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/9499/57333153.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Faul looks so pretty in this one - strike a pose :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Billinwhite2.jpg

Paul was not faggy at all

http://img47.photobucket.com/albums/v145/Kissmekatie/Paul_leaning.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Weeeee! Faul is such a fag! :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/ontheramp.jpg

Paul was not effeminate

http://img47.photobucket.com/albums/v145/Kissmekatie/paulnb2.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

You seem to be obsessed with sex. This is the stupidest line of reasoning I have ever seen from the PID side. And I've seen some doozies.


http://img382.imageshack.us/img382/7845/knotts8xo.jpg http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/7770/fpmaster2im.gif

[seaofgreen]

And the faggy pics of Faul just keep coming:


Okay, so what insults have you got lined up for Linda and the rest of the family then?

[faulconandsnowjob]

Hey, I don't have anything against homosexuals. But the simple fact is that Faul is light in the loafers, & Paul was not. There's nothing wrong w/ being gay, obviously. I'm just making an observation that Faul is faggy & Paul wasn't. I think it's a legitimate difference to point out.

I don't even know what this is about. :p

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/Areyouserious-1.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

Cowboy Faul

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1182707066_f.jpg

Cowboy Paul

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60/Trueclues/1zpm250ps1.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

Yeah. Paul never makes that jaw to the left move, AND he never looks at the neck of his bass.

http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1231/cudn.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

Interesting what happens to Paul from Kenya when you remove the mustache and give him a mop top.

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Kenya_Paul.gif



Also interesting what happens when you give pre-'67 Paul a '67 cut and 'stache (where applicable). Or vice Versa.

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/MPF-FP-MASTERPIECE.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/mpf122707.jpg


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/mciiimpf.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/fpspotato_faul.jpg


And none of them look the least bit gay. :eek:

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's funny how Paul was hot & Faul was ugly. Gross :eek:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paul_sff_faul.jpg

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's interesting how pictures of Paul & Faul have been blended together to make Faul look more like Paul

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sgt_pepper_blend.jpg

[socrates]

lol!:D..........YES MATE I AM DIGGING IN!,,,,,,,,,,,THE LONGEST WAIT IN THE HISTORY OF ANYTHING!

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bpl-3B7AQzc/ShNwB1UVkzI/AAAAAAAAAs4/dvgfU7ReSGA/s400/waiting.gif

Hang in there buddy - our thoughts are with you. :)

[socrates]

It's funny how Paul was hot & Faul was ugly.

Paul was hot.


hot Paul

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/flash.jpg

Sorry, it's just not credible that creepy Bill is hot Paul.

Faul was ugly.

I always wondered what happened to Paul's looks after 1966 - why he got ugly...


some ugly, dorky guy was pretending to be Paul.

Learning About Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

Symptoms

This disorder can include both obsessions and compulsions, and can be incredibly severe and time consuming because the sufferer is having to repeat things over and over again.

http://www.thehealthcarecenter.com/obsessive_compulsive_disorder.html

:rolleyes:

[the squire of gothos]

It's funny how Paul was hot & Faul was ugly. Gross :eek:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paul_sff_faul.jpg

It's also funny that you think your opinion on what's 'hot' or 'gross' is remotely relevant.

[the squire of gothos]

It's interesting how pictures of Paul & Faul have been blended together to make Faul look more like Paul

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sgt_pepper_blend.jpg


It's also interesting that it's your opinion that there is some blending going on, but you can't back it up with anything but that opinion.

In your opinion, how many celebrities have been replaced?

All of the Beatles right?

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's interesting how "Paul's" ears aren't the same.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ears.jpg

This is a fact that was also proven by forensic scientists. They said the differences couldn't be explained by surgery: ********************/mw83db

[the squire of gothos]

It's interesting how "Paul's" ears aren't the same.



It's more interesting that when you use photos where the ear at least mostly uncovered that the ears are indeed identical.

Left Ear
http://img18.exs.cx/img18/1858/dez3.jpg
http://img18.exs.cx/img18/2725/goodnighttonight.jpg


http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/leftearcomp-1.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/ear.gif


Right Ear

http://img42.exs.cx/img42/5940/earcompare1.jpg

http://img58.exs.cx/img58/3893/ear.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/earcomp.gif




Much more interesting indeed.


But hey. Keep bring up the same wrong conclusions over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

[socrates]

It's interesting how "Paul's" ears aren't the same.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ears.jpg

Oh, great - we're back to the ears yet again.... :rolleyes:

[socrates]

I bet this thread would make a great book for a psychiatrist.

[faulconandsnowjob]

You should try reading the article by actual forensics experts who did a biometrical analysis of Paul & Faul. They *proved* Paul was replaced. But then again, if you actually *read* the article, it might force you to question your basic assumptions. :D

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's funny how Paul's & Faul's eyebrows don't match

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/eyebrows.jpg

Proof Paul was replaced:

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

[the squire of gothos]

It's funny how Paul's & Faul's eyebrows don't match

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/eyebrows.jpg


Even funnier still that they were actually identical with every mood/expression.

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/eyebrows.jpg

The left top and bottom photo showed that JPM would trim his eyebrows. Pretty effeminate of him huh?

Also the moped accident scarred his left eyebrow.

[the squire of gothos]

I anxiously await your next group of unrelated photos.

[faulconandsnowjob]

I know you PIA'ers are not going to read this article that proves Paul was replaced b/c it goes against your cherished beliefs, but I'm going to post it, anyway.

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

It's interesting how Paul's & Faul's mouths don't match :p

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/lips.jpg

[the squire of gothos]

You should try reading the article by actual forensics experts who did a biometrical analysis of Paul & Faul. They *proved* Paul was replaced. But then again, if you actually *read* the article, it might force you to question your basic assumptions. :D



A little light reading regarding the source used for the "forensic investigation".

lol

LINK (http://maccafunhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=essentials&action=display&thread=3860&page=1)

[the squire of gothos]

I know you PIA'ers are not going to read this article that proves Paul was replaced b/c it goes against your cherished beliefs, but I'm going to post it, anyway.

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

It's interesting how Paul's & Faul's mouths don't match :p

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/lips.jpg

Every time I think I've seen the most ridiculous comp ever, you top yourself.

If you think these two completely differing expressions make a logical comparison, I genuinely feel sorry for you.

[formosan termite]

You should try reading the article by actual forensics experts who did a biometrical analysis of Paul & Faul. They *proved* Paul was replaced. But then again, if you actually *read* the article, it might force you to question your basic assumptions. :D

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

But, gee, that stupid article has been shown to be a PID fraud. The only pictures in that article came from a PID website by Sun King. The same guy who is promoting the idea that "Faul" is the clone of a WWII female spy, who was the real Paul's mother. Some source.:rolleyes:

And yes we actually read the article, and found out that even the "scientists" don't claim that they have proved Paul was replaced. If they don't claim proof, how can you? You can't.

[the squire of gothos]

I know you PIA'ers are not going to read this article that proves Paul was replaced b/c it goes against your cherished beliefs, but I'm going to post it, anyway.


It's interesting how Paul's & Faul's mouths don't match :p

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/lips.jpg

OK. Here is a lip comparison from the same photo shoot where the right photo isn't using an intentionally different expression

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/8606/actuallips.gif



I'm starting to thank that you're just busting our balls.

[formosan termite]

I know you PIA'ers are not going to read this article that proves Paul was replaced b/c it goes against your cherished beliefs, but I'm going to post it, anyway.

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

It's interesting how Paul's & Faul's mouths don't match :p

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/lips.jpg

LOL! I am laughing myself silly. This is as dumb as the pants tucked into the socks comp.:rolleyes:

All sane people know that lips are not carved in stone; that they are soft tissue and can assume many different shapes. To compare one stoic look against one where Paul is puffing up his cheeks and pulling in his lips is the height of either ignorance or dis ingenuousness.

[formosan termite]

It's interesting how pictures of Paul & Faul have been blended together to make Faul look more like Paul

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sgt_pepper_blend.jpg

The photo all the way on the right is from the original 1967 Sgt Pepper cover. The one in the middle is from the 1987 CD cover. So they blended a picture from 1966 with one from 1987 to come get a cover in 1967?

The middle picture was a terrible graphics job that stretched and cropped the original. But it is obvious that they could not blend the picture from the 1987 CD cover in 1967 to get the one on the 1967 cover.

[the squire of gothos]

All you need for this theory to work is:

A modern computer.


Photoshop (or similar program).



And a time machine.




Simple.

[faulconandsnowjob]

Interesting how the faces don't match up

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sFF_AHDN.jpg

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

Try reading it :D

[formosan termite]

Interesting how the faces don't match up

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sFF_AHDN.jpg


Not surprising when it is such a lousy job.


ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

Try reading it :D

We did read it. It is a fraud using photos only from a PID website run by a guy that promotes the idea that "Faul" is a clone of a female WWII spy who was the real Paul's mother. Wow. What a source.:rolleyes:

[faulconandsnowjob]

Creepy imagery from "Cream of the Beatles"

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/SooCreamy.gif

[limelady]

It's interesting how "Paul's" ears aren't the same.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ears.jpg

This is a fact that was also proven by forensic scientists. They said the differences couldn't be explained by surgery: ********************/mw83db

Also interesting to note that as we get older our ears get bigger by on average 0.22 mm a year. They also change shape and droop in places they didn't droop in our earlier years. The same goes for noses. :)

Study published by:
James A Heathcote, British Medical Journal 1995;311:1668, 23 December.

[faulconandsnowjob]

It's interesting how forensic scientists proved Paul and Faul's ears were different - and that it couldn't be explained by surgery.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Wired_Ear_Crop.jpg

... Technically called trago. All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. "In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometrico, identification of the right ear even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints," recalls Carlesi. But what trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, not be changed surgically. How then to explain the differences between the right ear of Paul McCartney in a previous snapshot to 1966 and probably a built in the late nineties? It is not only to betray trago a different conformation as well as other parts, just above the ear canal entrance, measurements and dell'antelice propeller. Things that ordinary mortals might seem irrelevant or unclear, but instead, every day, allowing the experts to locate and identify persons, bodies, photographs...

ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
********************/mw83db

[fireman]

That mouth-comp above is SOOOO ridiculous, it's not even worth debunking. It's like debating in Kindergarten.. :(

Regarding the ears Faulcon, you should consider my answer to that from like 100 posts before:

Pauls ears do NOT look different. I have shown PIDers many pics of before 1967 where Pauls earlobe looks totally different on every shot. It all depends on the lightning source. There are enough photos after 1966 where his ear looks EXACTLY like before 1966. PIDer ignore that fact.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1144290&postcount=4651


READ IT !:mad:

[limelady]

Oh come on people.

Look I have a suggestion. Why don't I close this thread for a while to give everyone a bit of time to pause and re-think their stance here.

Bottom line is this:

Is it really going to make one iota of difference to the world from here on if Paul was replaced sometime several decades ago? I'm not taking a side here because I honestly have no idea whether Paul was replaced or not. Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't, but lets face it, its not a life or death situation in and of itself.....and....we really do have 'bigger fish to fry' right now don't we?

So lets all just take a breather from this thread for a while, and look into other aspects of the 'conspiracy'.

Agreed?

One of you give me a holler in about a months time and I'll re-open the thread. Maybe by then we'll all have a different perspective. Right?

Stay cool peeps! :D