Paul McCartney is dead. [Archive] - Page 12 - David Icke's Official Forums

View Full Version : Paul McCartney is dead.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 08:37 PM

I love when he quotes himself in Third Person. I mean, Paul did that all the time before 66.

How many more times has he said stuff like, "Am I really that guy, Paul McCartney?".

LOL! Yeah, I could see how it would get quite old pretending to be someone else.

Macca gets bored of being a Beatle

... "You get fed up being him. You're always that guy," he said...

http://www.andhranews.net/Entertainment/2009/June/4-Macca-gets-bored-9623.asp

:p

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 08:45 PM

I've been called stupid, delusional and a whole host of other names in this topic -- so has Faulcon, and so have others. Insults are water of a ducks back my friends.
It just shows how desperate they're getting to keep a lid on this thing :p

As far as calling my comps poor...
You have awesome comps. I love them! :)

they are the same/above standard as MaccaFunHouse.
At least you don't doctor the photos to make them "fit" :p

ivgg

31-08-2009, 08:48 PM

It just shows how desperate they're getting to keep a lid on this thing :p

You have awesome comps. I love them! :)

At least you don't doctor the photos to make them "fit" :p

We are not less desperate than you.

socrates

31-08-2009, 08:51 PM

You have awesome comps. I love them! :)

Well, since we've already established that you can't actually tell the difference between Paul and 'Faul' your description is rather amusing.

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
A tampered Bill photo. His face has been compressed from top to bottom to make it look rounder like Paul's....

Whoooops! :D

At least you don't doctor the photos to make them "fit" :p

As has been established, above, you claim that pics have been "doctored" when they haven't been. LOL! :D

You're all hot air.

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 08:53 PM

I just can't get through to you, I keep telling you the fade you keep harping on about isn't a perfect match as you say, infact -- most of the fades at MaccaFunHouse are HILARIOUS.
There's no way to "get through" to disinfo agents. They're not here to discover the Truth. They're here to suppress it. They will ignore or discredit anything that doesn't support their position.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance...

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation
by H. Michael Sweeney
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 08:58 PM

There's a reason Faul had the tash and beard... it's a common way to disguise the face.
Great way to hide it, too. They could blame "Paul's" sudden change in appearance on the facial hair. Some people swallow it hook, line & sinker.

Paul w/ a fake beard - totally difft from Bill:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Private_View1.jpg

http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/4771/faulbeard.jpg

socrates

31-08-2009, 08:58 PM

They will ignore or discredit anything that doesn't support their position.

Unbelievable!

The word irony is obviously not in your dictionary.

Lord preserve us!

ivgg

31-08-2009, 08:58 PM

There's no way to "get through" to disinfo agents. They're not here to discover the Truth. They're here to suppress it. They will ignore or discredit anything that doesn't support their position.

Keep on saying insults.

That makes the chance that you are going to be BANNED from this forum bigger.

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 08:59 PM

Paul/Bill comp

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Private_View1.jpghttp://img18.imageshack.us/img18/1384/faulsified.gif

socrates

31-08-2009, 09:00 PM

"paul's" sudden change in appearance

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
a tampered bill photo. His face has been compressed from top to bottom to make it look rounder like paul's....

:):):):)

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 09:00 PM

Keep on saying insults.

That makes the chance that you are going to be BANNED from this forum bigger.

LOL! Yeah, you're ignoring the millions of insults that have been heaped on me & the other people trying to expose the TRUTH about this.

Besides, it's not an "insult" if it's *true.*

socrates

31-08-2009, 09:01 PM

Paul/Bill comp

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Private_View1.jpghttp://img18.imageshack.us/img18/1384/faulsified.gif

Yeah - er, like we've never seen that comp a hundred times already today.... :rolleyes:

ivgg

31-08-2009, 09:02 PM

Great way to hide it, too. They could blame "Paul's" sudden change in appearance on the facial hair. Some people swallow it hook, line & sinker.

Paul w/ a fake beard - totally difft from Bill:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Private_View1.jpg

There are a lot of different beards.

Paul never had a beard like that after 1966.

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 09:02 PM

Yeah - er, like we've never seen that comp a hundred times already today.... :rolleyes:

And yet you do it one more time. Great - thanks :p

ivgg

31-08-2009, 09:05 PM

LOL! Yeah, you're ignoring the millions of insults that have been heaped on me & the other people trying to expose the TRUTH about this.

Besides, it's not an "insult" if it's *true.*

I never said an insult. And by the way, if you say nasty things to other people, you can expect nasty things back.

socrates

31-08-2009, 09:08 PM

And yet you do it one more time. Great - thanks :p

You're welcome.

I'll do this again too, since you like seeing the same photo over and over again.

This is a photo you said was "Bill".

Funny, it was taken pre PID...

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
A tampered Bill photo. His face has been compressed from top to bottom to make it look rounder like Paul's....
:p

Oh, dear. Seems you can't tell the 'difference'.

You debunked yourself.

socrates

31-08-2009, 09:11 PM

For failcon, and other people who think there's an impostor:

This is PAUL:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif

:p

faulconandsnowjob

31-08-2009, 09:29 PM

Oh, btw, if Focrates hasn't been banned yet for all of his insults, no one will ever get banned.

socrates

31-08-2009, 09:58 PM

Oh, btw, if Focrates hasn't been banned yet for all of his insults, no one will ever get banned.

it's not an "insult" if it's *true.*

Therefore, I haven't insulted anybody.

:D

socrates

31-08-2009, 09:59 PM

Er, remind me failcon... Who is this again?

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif

:D:D:D

socrates

31-08-2009, 10:02 PM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif

"It's Bill, er no, it's Paul... Oooh, hang on a minute though, no, it's Bill, er Paul....."

socrates

31-08-2009, 10:06 PM

I find it pretty disturbing that some people can't tell the difference between Paul & Faul even after all of the differences have been pointed out to them.
:D

Interesting how people who have not been conditioned to see them as the same can tell the difference. :D

The PIA'ers on here must have the worst eye for detail if they can't tell the difference. Actually, they've proven time & again they can't discern at all - even when the differences are really obvious, like a much longer nose. It's kind of sad & pathetic at some point... :D

Apparently only people w/ a decent eye for detail see the difference btw those 2 people :D

Oh - the IRONY!

:rolleyes:

hunter77

31-08-2009, 11:22 PM

:D

:D

:D

:D

Oh - the IRONY!

:rolleyes:

good points but i can't belive your still humoring these nutjobbs. get out while you can:eek::D

socrates

01-09-2009, 12:05 AM

good points but i can't belive your still humoring these nutjobbs. get out while you can:eek::D

I can't - the pay is too good! :D

socrates

01-09-2009, 12:11 AM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif

"....... Or maybe it's Bill....... No, Paul.... Er, it's Bill, yes... No, Paul......."

socrates

01-09-2009, 12:13 AM

I find it pretty disturbing that some people can't tell the difference between Paul & Faul even after all of the differences have been pointed out to them.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_194.gif

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 01:42 AM

Hey, Focrates, why don't you do some more comps of Paul before he was replaced? :p

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 01:44 AM

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul-faul.gif

Paul's ears stuck out. Bill's don't.

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 01:47 AM

No one could wear a mullet quite like Bill :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Moustache_0003.jpg

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/bebo01/0110.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 02:01 AM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Moustache_0001.jpghttp://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paulvs.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 02:17 AM

Ok, not to be mean, but doesn't Paul seem cool while Bill maybe not so much?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_cig.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Billinwhite2a.jpg

socrates

01-09-2009, 02:23 AM

Hey, Focrates, why don't you do some more comps of Paul before he was replaced? :p

Why? You've already proven to everybody that you can't tell any 'difference' between Paul and 'Faul'. :p

MESSAGE TO FAILCON:

This is PAUL pre PID:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
A tampered Bill photo.

OOOPS!

socrates

01-09-2009, 02:26 AM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/201848E0969611DEBD53DCB4DB90F874.jpg

socrates

01-09-2009, 02:46 AM

I'll let you spend another couple of pages posting countless, pointless, Paul McCartney photos now.....

I'm off....

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 04:08 AM

His ear is so FAKE. It's just funny at some point :p

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/1976_September25_Venice-1.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/05retro.jpg?t=1251771784

phrased eyebrow

01-09-2009, 05:30 AM

""Slip up"???? He DID sing it - as Fireman proved.

More PID nonsense.

Will it ever end?
I admit that I made a mistake, I jumped to a conclusion. Like when I presumed PMC was alive and well? We'll see in the end. But it also proves that Beatles details are well known and easily memorized by anyone with an interest.

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 05:38 AM

Originally Posted by socrates
""Slip up"????

You know what was another "slip up"? When Bill said the Beatles were "a set up affair" when he joined :p

Phrased Eyebrow, did I ever tell you how much I like your signature?

Faul's 5 o'clock shadow is different from Paul's.

That's great :)

phrased eyebrow

01-09-2009, 05:53 AM

Thanks, Faulcon. I was irked when I couldn't respond a few days ago, and I had to post it Somewhere. :)

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 07:12 AM

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/Paul12.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Evolution_Bill_BeatlesRun.jpg

fireman

01-09-2009, 08:59 AM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/201848E0969611DEBD53DCB4DB90F874.jpg

:D:p:):D

Gotcha!

:)

ivgg

01-09-2009, 09:05 AM

Err, I was:

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3919/faulsified2.gif

:p

About this comp:

The early picture is end 50's or begin 60's. Paul was a teenager at that time.

The other picture is end 60's, I think Paul was 25, 26 or 27 years old at that time.

Huge age difference.

ivgg

01-09-2009, 02:49 PM

[QUOTE=faulconandsnowjob;1236046]You know what was another "slip up"? When Bill said the Beatles were "a set up affair" when he joined :p

[QUOTE]

That's true what Paul said. John Lennon was the founder of The Beatles (only it was called The Querrymen). Paul joined.

ar20

01-09-2009, 03:42 PM

About this comp:

The early picture is end 50's or begin 60's. Paul was a teenager at that time.

The other picture is end 60's, I think Paul was 25, 26 or 27 years old at that time.

Huge age difference.

Yeah, that was my point.

Did you see my Young Paul into Paul fade? Age didn't change him drastically there, so why does it occur when you Paul/Bill age?

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9900/paulintoyoungpaul.gif
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3919/faulsified2.gif

Please check back over what I say and what I post.

Socrates:

I don't know what you're getting giddy at, I already admitted the "hundreds of pictures" thing was my own assumption and flat out told you I don't believe for a second they based a 9-page assessment of this on a few pics from a PID site. Of course, my opinion.

Let's base the scenario here...

2 scientists approach wired Italy...

"Hi, we're both scientists and in two minutes we went on a PID site and looked at 3 comparions... we don't think it's the same guy"

"Are you sure?"

"Yes."

"Okay, we'll print you next month"

Please...

Give them, me, and you -- some form of credit here. :rolleyes:

Also, to the guy calling us nutjobs -- thanks, you've been shying away from the fact that you're all incredibly insulting.

Pot kettle black, nevermind we're all on a board following a guy who believes shape-shifting interdimensional lizard people run every major center of power on this planet. Nooo, let's pick on people who believe a guy was replaced.

NEVERMIND THAT MICHAEL JACKSON CAN SUDDENLY TURN FROM COOL BLACK GUY TO WHITE PETER-PAN PEDOPHILE OVERNIGHT AND THEY CAN TELL YOU IT WAS BLEACH/VERTILIGO THAT CAUSED IT

Or all the other stuff once considered "kooky".

People really are huge hypocrites. Myself included.

formosan termite

01-09-2009, 04:11 PM

socrates

01-09-2009, 07:09 PM

theenlightenedone

01-09-2009, 07:27 PM

Sooo... That Paul/Paul fade is supposed to be matching up...

... and THIS isn't?

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

:rolleyes:

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 07:40 PM

2 scientists approach wired Italy...

"Hi, we're both scientists and in two minutes we went on a PID site and looked at 3 comparions... we don't think it's the same guy"

"Are you sure?"

"Yes."

"Okay, we'll print you next month"

Please...
lol! Yeah, I bet the scientists checked everything at least 10 times to be sure. Let's not forget that they initially thought Paul & Bill were the same person, & that they wanted to disprove PID.

Also, to the guy calling us nutjobs -- thanks, you've been shying away from the fact that you're all incredibly insulting.
That's just a way to discredit people who are trying to get the truth out. They probably learned that in Disinformation Tactics 101. :p

NEVERMIND THAT MICHAEL JACKSON CAN SUDDENLY TURN FROM COOL BLACK GUY TO WHITE PETER-PAN PEDOPHILE OVERNIGHT AND THEY CAN TELL YOU IT WAS BLEACH/VERTILIGO THAT CAUSED IT
Some people will believe anything :p

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 07:45 PM

Perhaps the worst song Bill has churned out is "Ever Present Past." It's interesting, though, b/c of its references to doubles:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVGk5qm6Mac

- 25 seconds... A second "Paul" appears in the shot.

- 40 seconds... Bill sings, "I think of everything to be discovered."

- 58 seconds... Just coming into the chorus as Bill sings... "My ever present past," a similar suited man walks by the camera and clicks his fingers.

- 1.32 min... Again a second "Paul" walks onto the set.

"Uncle Benny" at
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=195888&page=108#pid7010216

mind1universe

01-09-2009, 07:56 PM

Oh, btw, if Focrates hasn't been banned yet for all of his insults, no one will ever get banned.

SOCRATES humilated me and ridiculed me through smileys, pictures, and association with dis info

Trying to purposely twist and ridiucule my presentation on this board. But I have kept calm and rather observed and I will continue to do the smart thing. :D

I'm alarmed and appaulded that he hasn't been gotten a perma ban to be honest.

mind1universe

01-09-2009, 07:58 PM

Sooo... That Paul/Paul fade is supposed to be matching up...

... and THIS isn't?

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/perfect-match.gif

:rolleyes:

Posting photoshopped pictures twice isn't going to fool people.

Your now overstepping the line.

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 08:33 PM

SOCRATES humilated me and ridiculed me through smileys, pictures, and association with dis info

Trying to purposely twist and ridiucule my presentation on this board. But I have kept calm and rather observed and I will continue to do the smart thing. :D

I'm alarmed and appaulded that he hasn't been gotten a perma ban to be honest.

I've got just one thing to say to Bill, Focrates, & the other disinfo/PIA people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUTXb-ga1fo

:D

BTW, I LOVE the ignore feature on ATS. I think I will just pretend there is one here :D

ar20

01-09-2009, 09:11 PM

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9900/paulintoyoungpaul.gif

This is instructive. It is a poorly done fade, but it does show something. This is a comp of pre '67 Paul and pre '67 Paul. It lines up badly. The nose looks different, the eyebrows look different, the ears look different and the shape of the face is different.

If these can look so different, why is it a surprise that you can find pictures of pre '67 and post '66 Paul that look different. Yet this is the basis for declaring that Paul was replaced.

Lens types, lighting, angles and so forth can cause pictures of the same person to look different. This is not fantasy. It is not something made up by PIA people. That is in any basic book on photography. Do NOT take my word for it, research it for yourselves.

Comparing photos and saying some look different is the sand upon which the foundation of the PID theory is built.

Dear god in heaven, I can't deal with this anymore... it's beyond stupid.

You fade in from the eyes... the face doesn't change, the position of the nose does change because they aren't the EXACT same picture...

The ears are covered because it's a different haircut (something you all can attest to :rolleyes:, the point being -- his facial features didn't change that much as to when you fade Paul/Faul.

It doesn't line up right, but that doesn't matter -- because Paul is Paul.

Get my point now, or shall I walk through it again with you?

And stop singling out one picture, it goes in the mix with the Young/Paul, Young Paul/Faul -- to illustrate the difference that age doesn't matter and shouldn't change someone so much.

Isolating one picture and stomping on it is TOTALLY ignoring the point I made.

fireman

01-09-2009, 09:16 PM

BTW, I LOVE the ignore feature on ATS. I think I will just pretend there is one here :D

..now that shouldn't be a problem for you.

:rolleyes:

You are too afraid too lose your fragile concepts anyway, that's why you put these electronic blinders on..

fireman

01-09-2009, 09:19 PM

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 09:21 PM

And stop singling out one picture, it goes in the mix with the Young/Paul, Young Paul/Faul -- to illustrate the difference that age doesn't matter and shouldn't change someone so much.

Isolating one picture and stomping on it is TOTALLY ignoring the point I made.

That is just one of their tactics to keep the truth from coming out.

Of course, "age" can't account for all the changes we see in Paul in his 20's. Even surgery can't account for all of them.

brainfreeze

01-09-2009, 09:23 PM

..now that shouldn't be a problem for you.

:rolleyes:

You are too afraid too lose your fragile concepts anyway, that's why you put these electronic blinders on..

Sorry to quote you fireman, too lazy to scroll back actually :p but...

There is an ignore feature in user cp, IIRC.

socrates

01-09-2009, 09:24 PM

SOCRATES humilated me
You humiliate yourself with posts like this:

Cranberrry sauce, wiggles around the room. Cranberry jelly, Wiggles around the room

boo!

oh shit.

Oh shit.

Ooops.

Oh well. can't shoot me. wiggles and wiggles around the room.

COO COO CHOO COO COO CHOOO.

:rolleyes:

and ridiculed me through association with dis info

Seems you can dish it out but can't take it.

You have accused myself and other members here of fraud and being "dis info" agents ever since you joined this thread:

Look at the pictures you photoshopped and wonder why people are accusing you of being a dis info agent....

I've already explained obviously how you manipulated these photos.

Hi to all the dis info agents.

The more dis info there is for now the better. All your doing is speeding it up. Keep behaving like you do above. Your all doing perfect.

So my advice is hire more Macca secret dis info agents to keep the masses stupid.

Keep this up. I will see how long you last to keep the dis info and distraction going?

Ever heard of hypocrisy? :rolleyes:

Look it up in the dictionary.

faulconandsnowjob

01-09-2009, 09:30 PM

Do people see how this doesn't work?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/spies_like_us.jpghttp://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ahdn_2.jpg

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1260/disguise1.jpg

socrates

01-09-2009, 09:43 PM

Dear god in heaven, I can't deal with this anymore...

And then proceed to do exactly the opposite......:rolleyes:

The ears are covered because it's a different haircut (something you all can attest to :rolleyes

But you can still clearly see that the younger Paul's ears stick out more.

And in many 'Faul' photos his ears are covered. Doesn't stop PIDDERS saying they're "different" though. :rolleyes:

the point being -- his facial features didn't change that much as to when you fade Paul/Faul.

Gimme a break!

There are far less facial changes in this comp of Paul/'Faul'...

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3919/faulsified2.gif

... than this one of Paul/Paul....

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/9900/paulintoyoungpaul.gif

If you are arguing otherwise, don't bother because anyone looking at them objectively can see that.

It doesn't line up right, but that doesn't matter -- because Paul is Paul.

What great logic!

If "it doesn't line up right it doesn't matter -- because Paul is Paul." But if a Paul/'Faul' comp doesn't line up right then it does "matter" and therefore proves they are not the same man? :eek:

Your mental gymnastics and perversion of sense and logic is quite astounding - even for a PIDDER. :eek:

How you can use one rule for one comp and then completely REVERSE the rule for another comp is ludicrous.

You either use the same criteria for both, or not at all.

Lord preserve us!

socrates

01-09-2009, 09:48 PM

Of course, "age" can't account for all the changes we see in Paul in his 20's.

Quit the BULL!

You proved to everyone here you couldn't see "all the changes" when you said pre PID PAUL was "Bill":

Remember?

Here, I'll remind you:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
A tampered Bill photo.

:D:D:D

So much for "all the changes" you can "see", eh? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 12:18 AM

Dear god in heaven, I can't deal with this anymore... it's beyond stupid.

You fade in from the eyes... the face doesn't change, the position of the nose does change because they aren't the EXACT same picture...

The ears are covered because it's a different haircut (something you all can attest to :rolleyes:, the point being -- his facial features didn't change that much as to when you fade Paul/Faul.

It doesn't line up right, but that doesn't matter -- because Paul is Paul.

Get my point now, or shall I walk through it again with you?

And stop singling out one picture, it goes in the mix with the Young/Paul, Young Paul/Faul -- to illustrate the difference that age doesn't matter and shouldn't change someone so much.

Isolating one picture and stomping on it is TOTALLY ignoring the point I made.

I get your points, they are just wrong.

Yes, I agree. That fade was beyond stupid.

The features look different. A lot more different than the fades we have presented.

Are you saying that that poor fade shows more similarity than these? If so you are blind.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faul_spies_george.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/6723962_b4865592c5-1.gif

The second fade shows better similarity even though the age difference is like over 30 years!

It is not just the hair with the ears. They stick out more in one picture than the other. But as we have shown with examples from a photography. magazine, the lens type can affect that.

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 12:30 AM

Quit the BULL!

You proved to everyone here you couldn't see "all the changes" when you said pre PID PAUL was "Bill":

Remember?

Here, I'll remind you:

:D:D:D

So much for "all the changes" you can "see", eh? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Not only that, she said flatly that Paul had no freckles. Until you showed that pictures of Paul she had posted showed freckles.

She said that Paul's eyes NEVER (and she capitalized it) looked green and dared us to find one picture showing Paul with green eyes. We presented several.

She stated flatly that Paul's eyes were brown, even though we showed that Paul himself, in 1965, said they were hazel.

She stated flatly that Paul's hair always went from left to right and "Faul's" always went from right to left. Until I pointed out that two photos of "Faul" that she had presented in that same post showed "Faul's" hair going left to right.

Oh, and over and over she states that hazel eyes can not look green, even though we have presented many many sources, including the Stanford Department of Medicine, proving that hazel eyes can, and many times do look green.

So much for the great attention to detail self-proclaimed by the PID believers. It just makes me laugh out loud when they call us blind and claim we lack their attention to detail.

ar20

02-09-2009, 12:59 AM

I get your points, they are just wrong.

Yes, I agree. That fade was beyond stupid.

The features look different. A lot more different than the fades we have presented.

Are you saying that that poor fade shows more similarity than these? If so you are blind.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faul_spies_george.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/6723962_b4865592c5-1.gif

The second fade shows better similarity even though the age difference is like over 30 years!

It is not just the hair with the ears. They stick out more in one picture than the other. But as we have shown with examples from a photography. magazine, the lens type can affect that.

Haven't you figured out yet, that your fades of these are incredibly unreliable and you have to just accept them based on the fact...

1) They aren't straight on poses of Paul and Faul
2) Pauls wearing huge shades in one
3) Faul is covering his mouth

I'm sorry, but you can rag on my fades all you want they prove a point regardless... people simply don't change this much:

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3888/faulisalive.gif

Until such time when you lot one fade that doesn't include Paul being morphed into Faul with a Tash or Beard, then you can come back to me on this.

Explain above, and no -- it isn't my fading skills. :rolleyes:

EDIT:

Challenge to PIA'ers... let's get together a photo of Paul and one of "Faul" from the front and we'll do seperate fades.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 01:24 AM

When the comps are of *undoctored* pics of Paul & Bill, then it's obviously not the same person. We know that *some* people have doctored photos to make them look more alike. *Some* people have also done comps of Paul-Paul pre-replacement. The point is to compare photos of "Paul" before he was replaced in mid 1966 w/ ones starting in Nov. 1966 & later.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 01:25 AM

1) They aren't straight on poses of Paul and Faul
2) Pauls wearing huge shades in one
3) Faul is covering his mouth

Why don't they just do fades w/ them covering their faces w/ their hands or a veil or something? lol :p

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 01:45 AM

Bill showing his right-handed tendencies

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/cig_righthand.jpg

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 01:56 AM

Fades rarely match, or even present the neck, ears, or Complete head. So the surgeons give some freckles. How many and where they go is just a matter of record.

seaofgreen

02-09-2009, 02:57 AM

You know what was another "slip up"? When Bill said the Beatles were "a set up affair" when he joined :p

Talking of slip-ups:

Originally posted by seaofgreen
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
Originally posted by seaofgreen
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
I always thought it was weird that Eric Clapton played lead on "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." If you know any lead guitarists, you'll know how extremely rare that is for one to give up an opportunity to play lead.

Er, Taxman?

I didn't realize Paul had played lead on "Taxman" (& "Drive My Car"). Ok, so he was even more of a brilliant genius than I thought :-P

But then I have to ask, why didn't Paul play lead on "While My Guitar Gently Weeps?"
Because he was dead of course -- sheesh!
As we all know, anyone who makes a slip up has been replaced by an imposter -- I wonder what the original faulcon was like...

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 04:19 AM

George played bass, right? And went to John for help. Ringo knows why.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 04:41 AM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/Faulinshorts.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Billandmartha13.jpg

Paul's - not funky at all :)

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/hide.jpg

How many toes does Bill have? Seriously. I think he might have been issued an extra one...

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 06:04 AM

somebody please fade the feet.

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 06:06 AM

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 06:10 AM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMCgoOTQnAM

John's reaction to Bill while he's rambling on about "the past" (starting around 6) is pretty funny. Watch how John stretches, smokes, & puts his head down. He isn't really paying attention... It's clear he's not interested.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 06:12 AM

somebody please fade the feet.

LOL! :p

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 06:51 AM

The new Beatles Rock Band (being released on 9-9-09 quite coincidentally) uses footage of Bill from a "Hey Jude" photo shoot. Interesting how they made it seem (almost) real. It goes to the illusion creation...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04JlvZZTQOI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnPtDkSGpHA

fireman

02-09-2009, 08:13 AM

Bill showing his right-handed tendencies

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/cig_righthand.jpg

cool picture!! thanks for posting that Faulcon!

Of course it doesn't prove anything, Paul was smoking right-handed all the time:

http://www.beatlesinterviews.org/1964.beatles.kansas.city06.jpg

But a great pic nevertheless! :cool:

ar20

02-09-2009, 08:42 AM

:rolleyes: You covered Paul's face in that last one. 6 toes or no, doesn't count. ;)

Nice try at sarcasm, idiot.

You know fine well what was meant by face covering.

In that last one it's completely covered so it's impossible to use that for a fade, but we know it's Paul because well... it is.

Until you make a fade without a beard, tash, sunglasses or whatever -- then you have nothing to stand on.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 08:46 AM

Of course it doesn't proof (sic) anything.

Smoking w/ the "wrong" hand is a little different from lighting a cigarette w/ it. I would find it very awkward using my left hand to do that.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 08:47 AM

boots

02-09-2009, 09:06 AM

SOCRATES humilated me and ridiculed me through smileys, pictures, and association with dis info

Trying to purposely twist and ridiucule my presentation on this board. But I have kept calm and rather observed and I will continue to do the smart thing. :D

I'm alarmed and appaulded that he hasn't been gotten a perma ban to be honest.

FFS.

* Stop slapping me with those smiley's and those pics really pack a punch*

That's what happens with the truth. It hurts.

I will continue to do the smart thing. :D

Whats that?? Not posting ridiculous accusations about disinfo and cranberry sauce.

Post something credible.

.

theenlightenedone

02-09-2009, 09:25 AM

Nice try at sarcasm, idiot.

You know fine well what was meant by face covering.

In that last one it's completely covered so it's impossible to use that for a fade, but we know it's Paul because well... it is.

Until you make a fade without a beard, tash, sunglasses or whatever -- then you have nothing to stand on.

There already is a ton of fades like that ar20 :) If you look around on MFH you will find them :)

Two examples:

http://img234.exs.cx/img234/852/slamdunk.gif

http://img103.exs.cx/img103/3989/pidmagfade3.gif

I suggest that everyone look through our "Essentials" page :)

http://maccafunhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=essentials

fireman

02-09-2009, 11:58 AM

Smoking w/ the "wrong" hand is a little different from lighting a cigarette w/ it. I would find it very awkward using my left hand to do that.

WOW, Faulcon, you are talking to me again! :) I thought i'm on your "ignore list"..:rolleyes:

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 02:05 PM

Nice try at sarcasm, idiot.

Takes one to know one, friend.

mind1universe

02-09-2009, 02:16 PM

You humiliate yourself with posts like this:

:rolleyes:

Seems you can dish it out but can't take it.

You have accused myself and other members here of fraud and being "dis info" agents ever since you joined this thread:

Ever heard of hypocrisy? :rolleyes:

Look it up in the dictionary.

Clever clever, clever.

Somebody who behaves like a bully, acts like a bully, and talks like a bully, is a bully.

Is'nt that what they say.

Someone who behaves like a dis info, acts like a dis info head, talks like a dis info agent, is a disnfo agent.

IS ONE. There is no debate or insult put forward. Actions speak the words I'm afraid. You can sing and play the victim all you like. But your so embarressing obvious. My advice is to keep going. It's almost unbearable to watch you continue. Despite been foolish, your showing yourself up in the manner I think is perfect for the cause of this thread and many many other PIA scams. Your foolishness is going to take you down. Nobody actually needs to judge you. I have not judged you personally. But your actions are clear. :)

However
You Insulting, and ridiculing people with abuse is another point altogether and is not acceptable. Do you hear me socrates Twisting peoples words and making laughing stock out of people here is also inappropriate.

You will sort it out now. :)

mind1universe

02-09-2009, 02:23 PM

FFS.

* Stop slapping me with those smiley's and those pics really pack a punch*

That's what happens with the truth. It hurts.

Whats that?? Not posting ridiculous accusations about disinfo and cranberry sauce.

Post something credible.

.

Don't interfere.:)

And Stop defending someones behaviour. It is not your responsibility.

You called me an idiot in an one liner. I have more respect than that. I would aslo have enough respect not to follow this on with you. You have shown yourself up long ago.

brainfreeze

02-09-2009, 02:24 PM

Clever clever, clever.

Somebody who behaves like a bully, acts like a bully, and talks like a bully, is a bully.

Is'nt that what they say.

Someone who behaves like a dis info, acts like a dis info head, talks like a dis info agent, is a disnfo agent.

IS ONE. There is no debate or insult put forward. Actions speak the words I'm afraid. You can sing and play the victim all you like. But your so embarressing obvious. My advice is to keep going. It's almost unbearable to watch you continue. Despite been foolish, your showing yourself up in the manner I think is perfect for the cause of this thread and many many other PIA scams. Your foolishness is going to take you down. Nobody actually needs to judge you. I have not judged you personally. But your actions are clear. :)

However
You Insulting, and ridiculing people with abuse is another point altogether and is not acceptable. Do you hear me socrates Twisting peoples words and making laughing stock out of people here is also inappropriate.

You will sort it out now. :)

Thank you for the belly laugh :D I wish there was an emoticon to truly reflect this.

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 03:17 PM

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 03:21 PM

Haven't you figured out yet, that your fades of these are incredibly unreliable and you have to just accept them based on the fact...

1) They aren't straight on poses of Paul and Faul
2) Pauls wearing huge shades in one
3) Faul is covering his mouth

Oh come on. Yes, but these are just a couple of dozens presented. Yes, in one, Paul is wearing shades, but it shows the shape of the face, the nose and the mouth are the same.

In the other, he partially covers the mount, but you can see that the nose and the eyes are the same even given they are taken over 30 years apart.

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 03:27 PM

There already is a ton of fades like that ar20 :) If you look around on MFH you will find them :)

Two examples:

http://img234.exs.cx/img234/852/slamdunk.gif

http://img103.exs.cx/img103/3989/pidmagfade3.gif

I suggest that everyone look through our "Essentials" page :)

http://maccafunhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=essentials

Neck length is different, and the shoulders just never do match up, do they?

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 03:30 PM

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/mpf020709.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/Mr%20Potato%20Faul/newpotato2009.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/newfade2009.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/10fe5y0.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/uppermost.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/uppermost_blink2.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/1-1.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/2.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/3-1.gif
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/4.gif

Same guy.

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 03:32 PM

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paulqe3_fade.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/sidebyside3.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/sidebyside5.gif

Same guy.

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 03:38 PM

Neck length is different, and the shoulders just never do match up, do they?

You're kidding, right.

In one picture he has a low neck shirt with no collar, and the other he has a more formal shirt with a buttoned up collare and he's wearing a tie. Of course the neck looks longer in one than the other.

And the shoulders. In one he has the shoulders hunched up. I can make mine go up and down, too.

mind1universe

02-09-2009, 03:45 PM

Same guy with photoshopped pictures.

:D

theenlightenedone

02-09-2009, 06:18 PM

Same guy with photoshopped pictures.

:D

That's all you say, and again, with zero proof.

formosan termite

02-09-2009, 06:55 PM

That's all you say, and again, with zero proof.

That is because they have no proof. Only baseless accusations.

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 07:00 PM

Truth is, in raising the question we ARE looking at it from both sides. Does the PIA crowd ever honestly try to see it from another viewpoint, or are they so afraid of being wrong that it's unthinkable?

socrates

02-09-2009, 07:12 PM

When the comps are of *undoctored* pics of Paul & Bill, then it's obviously not the same person.

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
A tampered Bill photo.

Yeah so "obviously not the same person" that you claimed an "undoctored" photo of Paul, pre PID, was "Bill".

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 07:32 PM

Neck length is different, and the shoulders just never do match up, do they?

Neither do the faces :p

Ok, I've seen tons of pictures of Paul & I have to say the man was quite photogenic. There are maybe 3 pictures of him where he doesn't look so good. Bill, on the other hand, it's quite the reverse.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 07:35 PM

That's all you say, and again, with zero proof.

We have proof that pictures have been photoshopped. These have:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sunglasses1-1.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/beatles_last_interview_66_faul.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_faul_66.jpg

There are more.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 07:43 PM

It's beyond ridiculous to think that girls would swoon over creepy Bill:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Billy_Shears_Says_Faul_Is_Here.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Bill_Sheppard_Mal_Evans_1966_05.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Dec66_10.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/SSFBill.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Pen03.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Billy_Life_03-1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/February_28th_1967.gif

Sorry, but ick.

faulconandsnowjob

02-09-2009, 07:55 PM

It makes sense that girls would go for Paul, but NOT creepy Bill.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ahdn_2.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paulvs.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/help_genuine.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_chair.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/edsul64sr2.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/mccartney_large.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paperbackwritera7.jpg

And of course, they didn't go for creepy Bill. Their reaction to him in SFF/Penny Lane was not exactly positive.

http://www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/dickclarka.mpg

astrochicken

02-09-2009, 09:41 PM

It makes sense that girls would go for Paul, but NOT creepy Bill.

Well you lot are more attuned to nuances than we are.

I would think that most women see them as two different people at a glance.
We need more women on this thread.

seaofgreen

02-09-2009, 09:57 PM

Forensic science has proven Paul McCartney was replaced in 1966.

Er, if you believe it's been proved, then why are you still here?

seaofgreen

02-09-2009, 09:58 PM

A reminder:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse photos/PIA-collage.gif

phrased eyebrow

02-09-2009, 10:16 PM

Love is Blind.

dedesuperman

02-09-2009, 10:20 PM

Today I would like to show you a screen cap took one video on Youtube showing at 1 minute 27 second the strange movement of the jaw makes by Faul when he sing the song Yesterday in 1976, take a look carefully and compare with Paul. If you make some research on Youtube and that you look at all times that Paul sings 'Yesterday' he stays constant as he sings and I never saw this kind of movement is only Faul knows how to make it not Paul. To refuse to admit it that be an insult of my intelligence!

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Faulsjaw-1.jpg :eek:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL1qCO04dpg

And this screen cap show strange scar around the mouth of Faul (I drew the arrows showing the suspected places) I would not know how to say if it comes of the plastic surgeries or guess?? For me in this picture it look like a scar! And you what do you think? Check it out:

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/ScarFaul-1.jpg :confused:

One picture is worth one thousand words

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:05 AM

I would think that most women see them as two different people at a glance.
We need more women on this thread.

I always wondered what happened to Paul's looks after 1966 - why he got ugly & creepy all of a sudden. :confused:

Sorry, it's just not credible that creepy Bill is hot Paul.

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:12 AM

Er, if you believe it's been proved, then why are you still here?

If you think it's a "hoax," why are you still here? Who spends that much time trying to refute a "hoax?"

mind1universe

03-09-2009, 12:15 AM

They are obviously different, if they weren't made so alike and with the surgery. The Faul, is uglier and hes does have obvious facial symmetry differences. Most noticeably the Jawline, nose, eyes and thinner face. He is different.

I really find it ridiculous that the agents think they are fooling people at this stage. You may be able to fool some. But your seriously undermining your own intellegence from this point on.

The more the agents post,

The better this gets:p

CRANBERRY SAUCE.

socrates

03-09-2009, 12:29 AM

I always wondered what happened to Paul's looks after 1966 - why he got ugly & creepy all of a sudden.

Ok, we better add to your classic quote refering to PAUL's photo:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/6667-2.gif
A tampered "UGLY & CREEPY" Bill photo.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_40.gif

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:30 AM

And this screen cap show strange scar around the mouth of Faul (I drew the arrows showing the suspected places) I would not know how to say if it comes of the plastic surgeries or guess?? For me in this picture it look like a scar! And you what do you think? Check it out:

Great work, Dede. The thing about that pic of Bill (from the comp you sent me) is that his mouth is wider than Paul's:

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00254/F_200705_May16ed_im_254851a.jpg

That's one thing surgery can't change! Oh, & his nose has that ugly tip on it that goes down like "u." Paul's didn't have that.

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/ScarFaul-1.jpg
http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/ahdn.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:33 AM

Focrates, why don't you post some more pre-replacement comps of Paul? People will know that some of the comps are Paul-Paul. That doesn't really help your cause, regardless of what you may think :p

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:34 AM

I really find it ridiculous that the agents think they are fooling people at this stage. You may be able to fool some.

They think they're going to be able to stop the truth from coming out, but it's too late now :p

socrates

03-09-2009, 12:39 AM

Sorry, it's just not credible that creepy Bill is hot Paul.

So, all those women saying Paul is still hot are not "credible", and you are? :eek:

The very same person who destroyed her own credibility even further when she mistook a photo of Paul for "Bill"?

Gimme a break! :D:D:D

socrates

03-09-2009, 12:43 AM

Focrates, why don't you post some more pre-replacement comps of Paul? People will know that some of the comps are Paul-Paul.

Well you didn't! :p:p:p

That doesn't really help your cause, regardless of what you may think :p

Yeah, a PIDDER saying a photo of Paul - pre PID - is "Bill" sure helps her cause, doesn't it? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:47 AM

Yeah, a PIDDER saying a photo of Paul - pre PID - is "Bill" sure helps her cause, doesn't it? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Remember how I said it could've been a Paul-Paul comp? You people will doctor photos & do pretty much anything to keep the truth hidden. But you know what? People can tell Bill is creepy :p

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/spies_like_us.jpg

Paul, on the other hand, was quite hot.

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/PM7-FA16x20Paul-McCartney-Portrait-.jpg

Are you going to try to tell us what a woman does or does not find attractive? LOL!

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 12:51 AM

Creepy Bill - I wouldn't touch that w/ a 10-ft pole. Ick!

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/strawcandles.jpg

Does it get worse than this?

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Faul_eyebrow.jpg

Paul - very cute

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/img889.jpg

even after a moped accident:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/james_paul_wounds.jpg

I suppose Focrates knows better what a woman would think was attractive. LOL! :p

socrates

03-09-2009, 12:57 AM

Remember how I said it could've been a Paul-Paul comp?

"Could've"? :rolleyes:

Proves you can't tell the difference, otherwise you would have known it was Paul.

After all, Paul is "hot" and 'Faul' is "ugly & creepy". :rolleyes:

You accuse us - yet again - of doctoring photos.

Again, more claims without any evidence.

In your PID world, it seems all you have to do is say something and it's automatically true. :rolleyes:

Like Paul 'never had freckles', eh? :rolleyes:

Thankfully, in the real world things are a little different.

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 01:08 AM

Who is buying that girls would chase after cars for this guy? Yuck :eek:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967_January_8th_Cromwellian_Club.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/SoFarOut4.jpg

Paul was not creepy at all:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/adorable-1.jpg

socrates

03-09-2009, 01:09 AM

I suppose Focrates knows better what a woman would think was attractive. LOL! :p

*SIGH*

I know what other women think:

Paul McCartney -- the sexiest man alive

But there was no doubt who most girls wanted in a heartbeat -- and then some. It was Paul. The press labeled him the Cute Beatle, but it was really The Sexy One. The girls called him "dreamy." And "gorgeous." And they used other words that I can't use here.

That was then. This is now. For many women who were first generation fans and grew up with the Beatles -- and even some who are younger -- those feelings still exist today. Even though he'll turn 67 in 2009 (take "When I'm 64" and add three.), for these fans, Paul is still the same as he ever was. Sexy as hell.

So we asked some devoted McCartney fans to give us their feelings about Paul McCartney now.

From Laura:

"Well there is so much we women can say. For starters, Paul comes across as very natural. He doesn't appear to try too be a fashion setter. He dresses as he always has which to me is sexy. He also comes across as a very common guy. He doesn't display any airs in his behavior, thoughts or speech that to me would be a turn off.

"To me, he is the sort of guy you could sit down and have a beer and laugh with. He also loves children, which to me is a very attractive quality in a guy. I also love the sound of his voice whether he is singing or just speaking. He has also been a very physically attractive guy, very sexy brown eyes, a lean physique, and some really attention-getting facial expressions. He is also appealing because of his energy level for a guy his age. He probably enjoys down time, but he doesn't seem to lose interest in doing things...very, very attractive. I don't think he would win the couch potato of the year award. He is just a very youthful man, and has always been that way, and very natural."

SR told us:

"What makes Paul still sexy after all these years? His youthful attitude towards life (even with all that he's been through lately), his graciousness with his fans, his philanthropic endeavors, his amazing work ethic with regards to his music, his delight in his children's accomplishments, his willingness to try to find happiness again with another woman, the fact that he wears tennis shoes with designer suits and still has had no plastic surgery. All this and I've always been a sucker for a musical genius!"

There was this comment from someone who asked to remain anonymous:

"I fell in love with Paul when The Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan in 1964. Years later, I attributed it to the raging hormones of a 12 year old. What do I attribute still having the same feelings for the most handsome man in the world when I am now 57? Never been married, but been told more than once that the guy couldn't compete with Paul McCartney."

Hot as sun

Sheryl:

"You have to understand, I fell in love with this man when I was 4. it has not left me. So, since he is 2 years younger than my mom... he has always been an older man. :) It is mojo, he has that. To me, sex appeal is not just a face, it is something that emanates from within you, which carries out of you and around you. Mainly, for me, it is Paul's eyes, smile, lust of life and his voice. To me, that is what makes a man sexy. Yes, he is still sexy."

Sheryl's comment concluded with this lyrical snippet from the McCartney song "The Lovers Who Never Were":

"For as long as the sun shines in somebody's eyes,
I believe in you baby, so don't tell me lies.
For as long as the trees throw down blossoms and leaves,
I know there will be a parade of unpainted dreams."

And Sue sent us this:

"Good timing just as the annual flock of pictures of Macca shirtless on a beach in January surfaces today. Actually I've seen him looking better (funny how he gets a bit porkier when he's busy squiring the ladies...), but really Paul's sexiness isn't just about body contours anymore (was it ever?).

"First it's that wonderful face...smooth skin, aqualine nose and those big syrupy brown eyes that just eat you alive. If the eyes are the windows to the soul, his soul is much more than rubber and I could be a peeping Tomasina looking in those windows all day. Then there's the hair. Still pretty full and wavy for a geezer, and he's added some pretty groovy sideburns in recent years. I like it when it curls up a little off the collar. OK the Vampira in me likes a bit of neck too. Right then...er,maybe there is a bit of body stuff to add in, but it has more to do with the way clothes hang on him than how he looks with his shirt off (maybe there is an age where that should stop?). He always looked best of the four in the Beatle suits back in the day, and that still holds true today.

"He has the perfect proportions for that: long, lanky legs, trim waist, squared off shoulders. He looks about as good in a bespoke suit as anyone I've seen. But he also does the battered jeans look well. Sartorial versatility is very sexy. Did I mention sweat? When he's playing a concert in a warm humid environment, as he did several times this past summer, he schvitzes like a garden hose. But I think I like the subtle pore-action the best. Y'know, the one little droplet snaking ever so slowly down his left cheek..."
"But above all that is his Whateveritis...that undefiniable stuff that makes him the unique delicious creature he is. I guess that's the category for everything else that makes him sexy, like kindness, artistic vision, child-like wonder, cheekiness, empathy, integrity and loyalty to his significant other. And if you're Heather Mills, the fact that he's richer than some entire Third World countries is probably the number one sexy thing. But the fact that he's not flashy with his money is also very attractive.

"And I think I covered everything...for now. I'll have to watch some more concert videos for more ideas....I love doing this kind of 'research.' "

And Kris chimes in:

"Oh, those eyes, that smile, that face! Who could resist?? We've seen him age so gracefully from that adorable young guy all us teenage girls went ga ga over, to that gorgeous man in the seventies on stage with Wings, to the handsome Dad and husband... and to "Sir", the knight in shining armor! Not to mention, the tremendous love for his wife... a kind, loving, caring man has great appeal, and tugs at the heartstrings.

"And he still has that gorgeous young guy lingering behind the eyes of the 66 year old!"

All my loving

From Rachel:

"It's undefinable. It's Paulie magic...the way he moves, talks, his little mannerisms. His looks don't hurt either. He can still give me goose bumps and make me so happy I can't stand it just by watching him in a video. I was sitting here
crying when I watched the "Sing The Changes" video for the first time. A part of it was pride in him that he can still do what he's always done so well. A part of it was thathe's in my heart, has been there since 1964 and I don't care how old he gets, I'll always lovehim and I'll always think he's special and that he's IT! Nothing can ever change the way I
feel about Paul and that's a pretty special thing in my book.

"As for his hotness, I think this link that Greg so graciously sent us recently covers it all. If you can't see that Paul is still hot after looking at this picture, you need some sort of transfusion."

From Carol:

"If the eyes are the windows to the soul, his soul is much more than rubber and I could be a peeping Tomasina looking in those windows all day. Ahhh, The Gaze........ man oh man, I'll never forget getting a zap of that! When he manages to lock eyes with you, he sends you to the 4th dimension, no kidding! It's like waves of whateveritis flowing through the two of you - like electricity! Nuh-uh, I did *not* imagine it ;).

"But above all that is his Whateveritis...that undefiniable stuff that makes
him the unique delicious creature he is. Exactly! There's only one in the world like him and the world is so much
better of for it."

From Mish:
"Over the last 40+ years the public has gotten a glimpse of what we believe is the real McCartney.
There are genetic stand-outs among us. McCartney embodies creativity, talent, intelligence, and generosity all wrapped up in a handsome package. So glad he rose to the top for many of us to admire."

McCartney's sex appeal isn't limited to first-generation fans. Here's a comment from Angela:

"Despite being old enough to be my father, and even perhaps my grandfather, there is still more than a glimmer of attractiveness and sex appeal to be found in Paul McCartney. As a 23 year old, I get a kick out of gushing over the same Paul "gutter gang" thoughts as those who were around to experience the Beatles and/or Wings days firsthand.
Sure, no one can deny that Paul is showing his age, but boy...does he show it well. His body is pretty well toned for someone his age, and the wrinkles that appear on his face only seem to compliment one of his best features: his eyes! I've learned firsthand that one wink from those famous eyes can still make you swoon! They seem to harbor some sort of compassion and intensity that renders you powerless when you become the object of "that" glance.

"Another part of my continuing attraction to Paul is his energetic stage presence. Here - hopping around stage, cracking jokes, maybe even flirting a bit with the lucky few in the first row - it becomes difficult to remember that Paul is in his sixties! Paul seems to really come alive on stage, and in drawing energy from the fans he only becomes more irresistible.

"Perhaps the most sexually attractive thing about Paul, at least for me, is just considering the "whole package." How can you not be attracted to a man who also promotes several good causes? His good will and charm only enhance his appeal! Paul is someone I can admire for both his personal and professional achievements as well as his looks and
personality, and that makes him a true object of affection."

From Beatlefan:

"Paul simply exudes sexiness! That look, that wink, that boyish grin makes him scrumptdeliumptous to this day! Not to mention how his hands move over the guitar or piano keys, oh baby! His voice is pure "magic", and makes you glad all over, a "call of the wild" if you will! Complete chemistry *is* James Paul McCartney!"

Young love

From Beverly:

"I was 13 years old when I fell in love with Paul. For all of the reasons that everyone has already mentioned.............his funny smile, his quick wit, his great body movements when he is playing guitar are so sensuous, he is definitely the sexiest man alive and I am amazed that he's never been on the cover of people magazine as such! But what really drives me wild about Paul are his voice and lyrics................whether it was his anger in "looking through you," or his pure love in "maybe I'm amazed" to the sadness of the "long & winding road" and I am not referring to the Specter version........but to the pure Paul * piano version........brings tears to my eyes every time. He is a renaissance man to me, talented in so many areas and strong and vulnerable as well. To this day, he has that underlying vulnerability that is so attractive."

From Sue:

"Keep Paul off the polar ice caps...we got enough problems with global warming as it is. Wheeeew...."

2dognight:

"The magic of the man never ceases to amaze."

Frances summed it all up neatly:

"The reason I believe Paul McCartney is still sexy...he is a romantic at heart and love is what it is all about."

http://www.examiner.com/x-2082-Beatles-Examiner~y2009m1d27-Paul-McCartney--still-sexy-after-all-these-years

Attractiveness is a matter of opinion, failcon!

Just because you are blinded by your PID nonsense to believe that 'Faul' is not attractive, doesn't mean to say other women share your view - as the above proves.

To use your personal view that 'Faul' is "ugly & creepy" and not attractive as some sort of PID evidence is taking lunacy to new levels.

Unbelievable! :rolleyes:

I'll leave failcon with this quote from "Rachael":

"If you can't see that Paul is still hot after looking at this picture, you need some sort of transfusion."

Better get down the transfusion centre then, failcon! :p

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 01:12 AM

Going back to this comp:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/F_200705_May16ed_im_254851a.jpg

Not only is Billy's mouth wider, but Paul's ears stick out a lot more. :p

fireman

03-09-2009, 02:46 AM

Thank you, explain that Faulcon!

A reminder:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse photos/PIA-collage.gif

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 03:11 AM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/69chain3.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/BillApril02_1974AcademyAwards.jpg

My sentiments exactly:

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/Paulface.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 05:51 AM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Bill_Beach_Flex.jpg

Compare above to a guy who wasn't creepy in the slightest -

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/beach7aaa.jpg

seaofgreen

03-09-2009, 07:28 AM

Er, if you believe it's been proved, then why are you still here?
If you think it's a "hoax," why are you still here? Who spends that much time trying to refute a "hoax?"
Nope, didn't think you'd be able to answer that one.:D

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 07:45 AM

So why don't you answer why you spend so much time on a "hoax"?

seaofgreen

03-09-2009, 08:39 AM

So why don't you answer why you spend so much time on a "hoax"?
Because I don't play Aunt Sally.

bealert

03-09-2009, 09:17 AM

Because I don't play Aunt Sally.
cant believe people believe the Paul McCartney is dead ...He looks the same sounds the same ...you crazy nutters will be telling me the moons made out of cheese soon.
LOONY ALERT
LOONY ALERT
LOL

boots

03-09-2009, 10:04 AM

Going back to this comp:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/F_200705_May16ed_im_254851a.jpg

Not only is Billy's mouth wider, but Paul's ears stick out a lot more. :p

You come up with these comparisons which are totally designed to bolster your philosophy. Which is bull.

Same eye's, same mouth, same nose.

What shit photos to use. One of a young PMc and one of an old PMc. Young Paul's head is tilted up and looking to the left and old Paul's head is looking straight ahead with a smirk on his dial.

You make a comparison with that! No wonder this theory has no credibility.

.

boots

03-09-2009, 11:02 AM

Don't interfere.:)

And Stop defending someones behaviour. It is not your responsibility.

You called me an idiot in an one liner. I have more respect than that. I would aslo have enough respect not to follow this on with you. You have shown yourself up long ago.

Pfft, Dont interfere. Like you are someone of authority to tell me not to comment with an opinion. If I know that PID theory is false. Then I'll say it and if you come up with bullshit about disinfo agents. Then I'll speak my mind about that too. If you want to be an idiot about it. Then wear the clothes that fit.

.

toty1994

03-09-2009, 01:08 PM

The more the agents post,

The better this gets:p

I couldn't agree with you more:D...well, apart from referring to those who disagree with you as 'agents' obviously. Seriously, do you really believe that?

...and from faulcon
They think they're going to be able to stop the truth from coming out, but it's too late now
I guarantee that a year from now faulcon will still be saying things like this on various boards. I suspect most of the rest of us (PiD & PiA alike) will by then have either moved on or died of boredom.

formosan termite

03-09-2009, 02:52 PM

*SIGH*

I know what other women think:

Attractiveness is a matter of opinion, failcon!

Just because you are blinded by your PID nonsense to believe that 'Faul' is not attractive, doesn't mean to say other women share your view - as the above proves.

To use your personal view that 'Faul' is "ugly & creepy" and not attractive as some sort of PID evidence is taking lunacy to new levels.

Unbelievable! :rolleyes:

I'll leave failcon with this quote from "Rachael":

"If you can't see that Paul is still hot after looking at this picture, you need some sort of transfusion."

Better get down the transfusion centre then, failcon! :p

This is beyond belief. Of course what you posted about Paul still being hot means nothing. All of those women crying when he got married means nothing. We should ignore all of the millions of women who found post 1966 Paul attractive, and believe faulcon?:rolleyes:

Why? Because she posts some photos of Paul making funny poses?

One member here recently posted that he believed Faulcon is an illuminati agent posting here in order to discredit the whole forum. I have to say, I am starting to find that believable.

formosan termite

03-09-2009, 03:19 PM

Great work, Dede. The thing about that pic of Bill (from the comp you sent me) is that his mouth is wider than Paul's:

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00254/F_200705_May16ed_im_254851a.jpg

That's one thing surgery can't change!

LOL! Two pictures. In one, Paul is serious and not smiling. In the other, he has a smile. And this is used as proof that Paul's mouth is wider. LOL! I am laughing myself silly. Newsflash: When a person smiles, the mouth gets wider! That is kind of the definition of a smile. Lips are not carved in granite. They are soft. They move and change shape.

Oh, & his nose has that ugly tip on it that goes down like "u." Paul's didn't have that.

Geez. Paul is decades older in the picture on the right. This could be a shocker like the moving lips, but people do age. Like it says on a plastic surgery site, "Nasal cartilage becomes thinner and loses its elasticity as we age, causing the tip of the nose to lengthen and droop." This is not rocket science. I have been knowing that since my early 20s, because mine began to droop way back then.

Aging is a common cause of nasal obstruction. This occurs when cartilage in the nose and its tip are weakened by age and droop because of gravity...
http://www.drbenke.com/plasticsurgery.html

It is just silly to talk about his nose tip being different comparing photos of a young man to one in his 60's.

Some attention to detail.:rolleyes:

formosan termite

03-09-2009, 04:09 PM

We have proof that pictures have been photoshopped. These have:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/sunglasses1-1.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/beatles_last_interview_66_faul.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_faul_66.jpg

There are more.

And just how is this proof? You just showed some photos.:rolleyes:

formosan termite

03-09-2009, 04:21 PM

Does the PIA crowd ever honestly try to see it from another viewpoint...?

Yes, I joined TKIN (60IF) back in 2003 intrigued with what I saw. Many others now at MFH were members of TKIN or NIR back to 2003 or 2004. We spent much time reading, looking at the PID evidence, researching and discussing things with the PID people. Over time we saw that the PID evidence was flawed and many of the theories put forth absurd.

We saw claims such as:

-Don Knotts replaced Brian.
-Faul is a clone of a female WWII spy.
-John Lennon was replaced by Charlie Brill, and it was Brill that was killed 12/08/80.
- Paul died from explosive diarrhea from IBS
- Paul died on an amusement park ride
- Paul didn't die but was replaced and Paul replaced Neil Aspinall

We have been at this for six years. We entered with an open mind and have read all of the PID evidence. But, we see it as not being credible, and as you can see, the theories put forth are just silly.

formosan termite

03-09-2009, 04:47 PM

I would think that most women see them as two different people at a glance.

Well, let us think about that.

1st, when you see film of Paul's wedding, there are hundreds of girls there crying their eyes out because their beloved Paul got married. They didn't think that he was replaced or was ungly and creepy.

Most of all there is the paternity lawsuit. There was a female who knew Paul McCartney up close and intimate. Much closer than any female member here.
She believes that the Paul she knew, intimately, before 1966 was the same Paul of the 1980's. She believed it so much that she filed a paternity lawsuit. Honestly, if she thought Paul had been replaced, why would she request a blood test to prove that Paul was the father? So, a female who really knew Paul, up close and personal, believes he is the same Paul today.

I know a female who grew up with Paul in Liverpool. What does she think? Same Paul. No replacement.

The women I work with. They still think it's Paul. And they think he's still cute.

ivgg

03-09-2009, 05:51 PM

So why don't you answer why you spend so much time on a "hoax"?

Imagine if we didn't.

If we didn't spend time on this, people are going to believe it.

More information here:

http://maccafunhouse.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=pid&action=display&thread=3856

ar20

03-09-2009, 06:39 PM

Dear god:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/PIA-collage.gif

This here, for a split second -- nearly had me convinced that I was wrong with PiD.

Then, common sense kicked into high-gear.

You lot clearly have no fucking shame. Are you actually taking pieces of Fauls face and tampering these pictures? You're right, I'm going to make this accusation without proof and I'll explain why.

Start afresh... do your silly little fades and comparisons like we do, but let's all start from a point of using single photos we find, that way we can lay the debate to rest on who's messing with what.

You know why I'm going to come out on the tampering?

How the fuck can you honestly say this guy is this guy with a STRAIGHT FACE?

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/nasapaul.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/SSFBill.jpg

You know what the difference is between PIA and PID? We don't have to tamper photos to prove our point.

I've seen the originals of most of the pics in your comparisons (I'm sitting with a dozen favourited links to photobanks of Paul/Faul) and I can tell something is up because they are NOT the source and NOT the original.

So like I say, let's play the game properly, shall we?

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3888/faulisalive.gif

Socrates, you're an absolute poor excuse for a guy by the way. You've actually hounded Faulcon non-stop in both topics, and for what? Is your point really that necessary to be made? We get it, you don't see it -- walk away then, you're done, you've said your say. Why can't you just "leave" like you've posted over and over again?

If Paul's alive like you say, you've nothing to worry about -- you can listen to Wings and dance round your room and rejoice. :rolleyes:

Well I made the challenge a few times already, but let's get the ball rolling:

Sourced images of Paul and Faul:

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/paulskis.jpg
http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/face4.jpg
http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/face5.jpg
http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/face6.jpg
http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/lindapaulandkeith.jpg

I can only post a few, but feel free to get them where I get them:

http://www.freewebs.com/thefabfourgalleries/paulmccartney.htm

Plenty there, and they're all right there for all to see -- so we can see what you're up to if you try anything, which at this point, I'm sure you're doing.

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 06:57 PM

And just how is this proof? You just showed some photos.:rolleyes:

I've already walked people through how those photos have been tampered w/ several times. You could try training your eye to pick up on things like that.

There is a thread on tampered photos here:
http://only1rad.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=plastic&action=display&thread=606

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 06:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by astrochicken
I would think that most women see them as two different people at a glance.

Well, let us think about that.

I don't really know how to explain this to you, but Bill is creepy & gross. Paul was hot. But of course, I suppose you know better what women find attraciive :rolleyes:

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 07:17 PM

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 07:19 PM

More photo-tampering - what's w/ Bill's right ear?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967_JuneBeatlesBook_BillySmile.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 07:21 PM

...and from faulcon

I guarantee that a year from now faulcon will still be saying things like this on various boards.

LOL! Hopefully, by then, Bill will have been exposed for the fraud he is. In just the last month alone, a forensic study has come out proving he was replaced, Letterman & Reuters asked him about PID. I have every intention of keeping up the pressure.

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 07:35 PM

creepy, creepy Bill (gross) :eek:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1974_Smiling.jpg

hot Paul

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/flash.jpg

seaofgreen

03-09-2009, 07:45 PM

More photo-tampering - what's w/ Bill's right ear?

Think about it, if there was any problem with his ears, why wouldn't he just keep his hair long to hide them?

faulconandsnowjob

03-09-2009, 08:07 PM

Think about it, if there was any problem with his ears, why wouldn't he just keep his hair long to hide them?

Why don't you just look at his right ear? If that looks normal to you, then I think we've gained some insight into your eye for detail...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967_JuneBeatlesBook_BillySmile.jpg

dedesuperman

03-09-2009, 08:40 PM

Hi again! I would like to know if someone among the PIA would be able to explain how Faul can move the jaw in a strange way when he sings 'Yesterday' compared to Paul who doesn't make it!?

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Faulsjaw-1.jpg :rolleyes:

Another thing someone would be able to explain the scars that appear around the mouth of Faul? (I drew the arrows that show the suspected places)

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/ScarFaul-1.jpg

Here I am going to show you a picture of the singer and French actor Serge Gainsbourg and to your right the picture of the Italian actor that is going to play the role of Serge Gainsbourg: Eric Elmosnino. Let's confess that the resemblance is enough impressive. :eek:

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/sergegainsbourgclone-1.jpg

It proves that we can replace someone by a look alike without anyone notice it! Because I confess that I swore that the Italian actor it is Serge Gainsbourg.

howie

03-09-2009, 09:43 PM

They have a Beatles week on BBC 2 & 4 from the 5th, one of the shows will feature Beatles 'myths', the ONE show did a short hit piece on it with Ray Connolly saying PID is a hoax because he knows what Paul looks like.

fireman

03-09-2009, 09:47 PM

socrates

03-09-2009, 09:56 PM

...and from faulcon

I guarantee that a year from now faulcon will still be saying things like this on various boards.

I guarantee that in TWENTY YEARS from now failcon will still be saying things like this..... :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

... and posting the same bloody pictures.....

.... and coming out with her stock phrases like "I find it quite disturbing that people can't tell the difference....."

socrates

03-09-2009, 09:58 PM

I don't really know how to explain this to you, but Bill is creepy & gross. Paul was hot.

In YOUR opinion!

I've already posted the quotes from various women who still find him attractive. :rolleyes:

Are you really this dense?

socrates

03-09-2009, 10:03 PM

Why don't you just look at his right ear? If that looks normal to you,

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967_JuneBeatlesBook_BillySmile.jpg
WTF? You can only see a small bit of it - the rest is covered by hair. :eek:

then I think we've gained some insight into your eye for detail...

I don't think you have any right to patronise anybody's eye for detail.

After all, you're the one who never even noticed that Paul had freckles! :rolleyes:

socrates

03-09-2009, 10:07 PM

.

:confused:

Please tell me where one of these photos are tampered????

These are comps that everybody can make with pics from the internet!!

No really, you are accusing me of faking? :rolleyes:

Your initial reaction was actually right.. it is the same guy..that's it!

:mad:

I think AR20 is refering to the comps where 'Faul's' hair and moustache have been put onto a photo of Paul.

Nothing sinister in that - despite the foot stamping of our PID friend. :rolleyes:

The images are not supposed to show anything other than Paul looks exactly like 'Faul' when he has the same hairstyle and moustache.

Typical PID nonsense trying to make something out of nothing.....

fireman

03-09-2009, 10:14 PM

But in that collage is no such photo!

That is actually "Fauls" head, completly cut out and pasted next to "Pauls"!

They just look so alike, because it's the SAME FREAKING GUY!!

:mad::rolleyes:

socrates

03-09-2009, 10:43 PM

But in that collage is no such photo!

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_13.jpg

Yeah - you're right. I thought the above photo was Paul with 'Faul's hair and moustache. But taking a closer look you've just put 'Faul's' head on Paul's shoulders.

AR20 is talking out his arse again. :D

ar20

04-09-2009, 01:27 AM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_13.jpg

Yeah - you're right. I thought the above photo was Paul with 'Faul's hair and moustache. But taking a closer look you've just put 'Faul's' head on Paul's shoulders.

AR20 is talking out his arse again. :D

If I'm talking out my arse, you're sure as shit seeing out yours:

http://cm1.theinsider.com/media/0/59/14/the_beatles_american_idol.0.0.0x0.360x375.jpeg

http://guittard.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/the-beatles-02_1_1.jpg

ar20

04-09-2009, 01:30 AM

http://rgcred.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/beatles5.jpg

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/3/3/1236123158794/The-Beatles-in-1963-002.jpg

Still no PIA'ers taking up the gauntlet?

Despite your deciept and total inept-slimyness, you do us a great service every time you post.

On behalf of seeing people everywhere, we cannot thank you enough.

ar20

04-09-2009, 01:34 AM

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 01:38 AM

In YOUR opinion!

I've already posted the quotes from various women who still find him attractive. :rolleyes:
Maybe you find Bill attractive, Focrates? I find him creepy & gross. I've provided some pictures of creepy, gross Bill to back that up, plus women's reactions to Bill after seeing SFF/PL for the 1st time. Ick.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1974_3_12_02.jpg

There's no ick factor w/ Paul

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/JPM/cute.jpg

Are you really this dense?

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/3424/banhim.jpg

What does it have to do w/ being "dense"? Bill is not particularly attractive to women. I think I can speak to that being a representative of the female gender. You on, the other hand, b/c you are not a woman, cannot speak to women's taste in men. If you want to speak as to gay mens' taste in men, go right ahead. :D

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 01:39 AM

WTF? You can only see a small bit of it - the rest is covered by hair. :eek:

I don't think you have any right to patronise anybody's eye for detail.

After all, you're the one who never even noticed that Paul had freckles! :rolleyes:

lol - you're the one who doesn't notice those freckles don't match. You also miss how the noses, jawlines, eyes, eyebrows & ears are all different, too :rolleyes:

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 01:42 AM

Quoting this because you've been ignored twice, like all the other points we make -- it's Troll City in here and they do a good job trying to divert issues.

Dede made a great post. It's definitely possible to replace someone w/ a lookalike. Some doubles even look more like the target than Bill does. People actually did pick up on him (probably b/c he's creepy & gross :D)

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 01:50 AM

Bill's gnarly-ass feet:

http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/Billandmartha13.jpg

Paul's normal-looking feet:

http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/paul_coconut.jpghttp://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/hideinthepool.jpg

http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/Dibujo_piconmartha.jpghttp://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/Dibujo_piconcoco.jpghttp://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt16/moroccia/pieenpiscina.jpg

Yikes!

ar20

04-09-2009, 02:00 AM

Photo Tampering doesn't exist, my bad:

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/1byAvedon1969.jpg

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/sodamncute.jpg

Oh and I just have to love this:

http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/surprised.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/McCartneyIItruth.jpg

ar20

04-09-2009, 02:06 AM

I know what Faulcon means by Slimy, you can just tell the presence of the two are different.

I'm a guy so I can't make a judgement call on looks like Socrates can, but I sure as hell can tell the difference between masculine and effeminate.

Faul definately "hams" it up, you know when a guy is in a club and trying to hard -- he just gives that vibe, and you know that no woman likes that.

Paul is just cool, laid-back and appears confident in himself.

The imposter clearly doesn't and never will.

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/PaulMcCartney721-1.jpg
http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc205/thebeatlesfour/paul/smoke4.jpg

You don't just end up bent overnight. And you'd have to be pretty bent to replace a Beatle for fame and fortune in the first place.

socrates

04-09-2009, 02:15 AM

Maybe you find Bill attractive, Focrates? I find him creepy & gross. I've provided some pictures of creepy, gross Bill to back that up

Oh, great, some more photos of Paul to back up your opinion that 'Faul' is gross! :rolleyes:

You do not need to post photos to back up this opinion.

Yeah, we all accept that your opinion is that 'Faul' is "gross".

So freaking what? :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I mean - are you seriously using your opinion of his attractiveness to you as some sort of PID 'evidence'' here, failcon?

Otherwise, why do you keep banging on and on about it? :confused::confused::confused:

socrates

04-09-2009, 02:18 AM

You lot clearly have no fucking shame. Are you actually taking pieces of Fauls face and tampering these pictures? You're right, I'm going to make this accusation without proof and I'll explain why.

Start afresh... do your silly little fades and comparisons like we do, but let's all start from a point of using single photos we find, that way we can lay the debate to rest on who's messing with what.

You know why I'm going to come out on the tampering?

You know what the difference is between PIA and PID? We don't have to tamper photos to prove our point.

I've seen the originals of most of the pics in your comparisons (I'm sitting with a dozen favourited links to photobanks of Paul/Faul) and I can tell something is up because they are NOT the source and NOT the original.

Yawn.... Quit the accusations and post some evidence for your "tampering" claims, then.

We've asked you often enough!

Put up or shut up.

socrates

04-09-2009, 02:45 AM

Hi again! I would like to know if someone among the PIA would be able to explain how Faul can move the jaw in a strange way when he sings 'Yesterday' compared to Paul who doesn't make it!?

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Faulsjaw-1.jpg :rolleyes:

What is "strange" about it?

And so what if you can't find Paul making it in earlier renditions?

Is he supposed to make the exact same expressions every time he sings it? :eek::confused:

Here's a similar expression:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/surprised.jpg

If he moves his lower jaw sideways a little, it will be more or less the same.

Another thing someone would be able to explain the scars that appear around the mouth of Faul? (I drew the arrows that show the suspected places)

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/ScarFaul-1.jpg

They could be cosmetic surgery scars from a few years ago. They could be lines caused by his expression or just age lines.

When you get older you get lines on your face. :D

Can you see any surgery scars here:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/JPSP1.jpg

I don't see any "scars."

socrates

04-09-2009, 03:06 AM

What does it have to do w/ being "dense"?

Because you keep on infering that because YOU personally don't find 'Faul' attractive then most other women don't either!

Ie:

Bill is not particularly attractive to women.

I think I can speak to that [sic] being a representative of the female gender.

So you are speaking on behalf of ALL women when you say 'Faul' is not attractive?

You are freaking unbelievable!

Proof you are talking out of your ass:

Paul McCartney -- the sexiest man alive

But there was no doubt who most girls wanted in a heartbeat -- and then some. It was Paul. The press labeled him the Cute Beatle, but it was really The Sexy One. The girls called him "dreamy." And "gorgeous." And they used other words that I can't use here.

That was then. This is now. For many women who were first generation fans and grew up with the Beatles -- and even some who are younger -- those feelings still exist today. Even though he'll turn 67 in 2009 (take "When I'm 64" and add three.), for these fans, Paul is still the same as he ever was. Sexy as hell.

So we asked some devoted McCartney fans to give us their feelings about Paul McCartney now.

From Laura:

"Well there is so much we women can say. For starters, Paul comes across as very natural. He doesn't appear to try too be a fashion setter. He dresses as he always has which to me is sexy. He also comes across as a very common guy. He doesn't display any airs in his behavior, thoughts or speech that to me would be a turn off.

"To me, he is the sort of guy you could sit down and have a beer and laugh with. He also loves children, which to me is a very attractive quality in a guy. I also love the sound of his voice whether he is singing or just speaking. He has also been a very physically attractive guy, very sexy brown eyes, a lean physique, and some really attention-getting facial expressions. He is also appealing because of his energy level for a guy his age. He probably enjoys down time, but he doesn't seem to lose interest in doing things...very, very attractive. I don't think he would win the couch potato of the year award. He is just a very youthful man, and has always been that way, and very natural."

SR told us:

"What makes Paul still sexy after all these years? His youthful attitude towards life (even with all that he's been through lately), his graciousness with his fans, his philanthropic endeavors, his amazing work ethic with regards to his music, his delight in his children's accomplishments, his willingness to try to find happiness again with another woman, the fact that he wears tennis shoes with designer suits and still has had no plastic surgery. All this and I've always been a sucker for a musical genius!"

There was this comment from someone who asked to remain anonymous:

"I fell in love with Paul when The Beatles appeared on Ed Sullivan in 1964. Years later, I attributed it to the raging hormones of a 12 year old. What do I attribute still having the same feelings for the most handsome man in the world when I am now 57? Never been married, but been told more than once that the guy couldn't compete with Paul McCartney."

Hot as sun

Sheryl:

"You have to understand, I fell in love with this man when I was 4. it has not left me. So, since he is 2 years younger than my mom... he has always been an older man. It is mojo, he has that. To me, sex appeal is not just a face, it is something that emanates from within you, which carries out of you and around you. Mainly, for me, it is Paul's eyes, smile, lust of life and his voice. To me, that is what makes a man sexy. Yes, he is still sexy."

Sheryl's comment concluded with this lyrical snippet from the McCartney song "The Lovers Who Never Were":

"For as long as the sun shines in somebody's eyes,
I believe in you baby, so don't tell me lies.
For as long as the trees throw down blossoms and leaves,
I know there will be a parade of unpainted dreams."

And Sue sent us this:

"Good timing just as the annual flock of pictures of Macca shirtless on a beach in January surfaces today. Actually I've seen him looking better (funny how he gets a bit porkier when he's busy squiring the ladies...), but really Paul's sexiness isn't just about body contours anymore (was it ever?).

"First it's that wonderful face...smooth skin, aqualine nose and those big syrupy brown eyes that just eat you alive. If the eyes are the windows to the soul, his soul is much more than rubber and I could be a peeping Tomasina looking in those windows all day. Then there's the hair. Still pretty full and wavy for a geezer, and he's added some pretty groovy sideburns in recent years. I like it when it curls up a little off the collar. OK the Vampira in me likes a bit of neck too. Right then...er,maybe there is a bit of body stuff to add in, but it has more to do with the way clothes hang on him than how he looks with his shirt off (maybe there is an age where that should stop?). He always looked best of the four in the Beatle suits back in the day, and that still holds true today.

"He has the perfect proportions for that: long, lanky legs, trim waist, squared off shoulders. He looks about as good in a bespoke suit as anyone I've seen. But he also does the battered jeans look well. Sartorial versatility is very sexy. Did I mention sweat? When he's playing a concert in a warm humid environment, as he did several times this past summer, he schvitzes like a garden hose. But I think I like the subtle pore-action the best. Y'know, the one little droplet snaking ever so slowly down his left cheek..."
"But above all that is his Whateveritis...that undefiniable stuff that makes him the unique delicious creature he is. I guess that's the category for everything else that makes him sexy, like kindness, artistic vision, child-like wonder, cheekiness, empathy, integrity and loyalty to his significant other. And if you're Heather Mills, the fact that he's richer than some entire Third World countries is probably the number one sexy thing. But the fact that he's not flashy with his money is also very attractive.

"And I think I covered everything...for now. I'll have to watch some more concert videos for more ideas....I love doing this kind of 'research.' "

And Kris chimes in:

"Oh, those eyes, that smile, that face! Who could resist?? We've seen him age so gracefully from that adorable young guy all us teenage girls went ga ga over, to that gorgeous man in the seventies on stage with Wings, to the handsome Dad and husband... and to "Sir", the knight in shining armor! Not to mention, the tremendous love for his wife... a kind, loving, caring man has great appeal, and tugs at the heartstrings.

"And he still has that gorgeous young guy lingering behind the eyes of the 66 year old!"

All my loving

From Rachel:

"It's undefinable. It's Paulie magic...the way he moves, talks, his little mannerisms. His looks don't hurt either. He can still give me goose bumps and make me so happy I can't stand it just by watching him in a video. I was sitting here
crying when I watched the "Sing The Changes" video for the first time. A part of it was pride in him that he can still do what he's always done so well. A part of it was thathe's in my heart, has been there since 1964 and I don't care how old he gets, I'll always lovehim and I'll always think he's special and that he's IT! Nothing can ever change the way I
feel about Paul and that's a pretty special thing in my book.

"As for his hotness, I think this link that Greg so graciously sent us recently covers it all. If you can't see that Paul is still hot after looking at this picture, you need some sort of transfusion."

From Carol:

"If the eyes are the windows to the soul, his soul is much more than rubber and I could be a peeping Tomasina looking in those windows all day. Ahhh, The Gaze........ man oh man, I'll never forget getting a zap of that! When he manages to lock eyes with you, he sends you to the 4th dimension, no kidding! It's like waves of whateveritis flowing through the two of you - like electricity! Nuh-uh, I did *not* imagine it .

"But above all that is his Whateveritis...that undefiniable stuff that makes
him the unique delicious creature he is. Exactly! There's only one in the world like him and the world is so much
better of for it."

From Mish:
"Over the last 40+ years the public has gotten a glimpse of what we believe is the real McCartney.
There are genetic stand-outs among us. McCartney embodies creativity, talent, intelligence, and generosity all wrapped up in a handsome package. So glad he rose to the top for many of us to admire."

McCartney's sex appeal isn't limited to first-generation fans. Here's a comment from Angela:

"Despite being old enough to be my father, and even perhaps my grandfather, there is still more than a glimmer of attractiveness and sex appeal to be found in Paul McCartney. As a 23 year old, I get a kick out of gushing over the same Paul "gutter gang" thoughts as those who were around to experience the Beatles and/or Wings days firsthand.
Sure, no one can deny that Paul is showing his age, but boy...does he show it well. His body is pretty well toned for someone his age, and the wrinkles that appear on his face only seem to compliment one of his best features: his eyes! I've learned firsthand that one wink from those famous eyes can still make you swoon! They seem to harbor some sort of compassion and intensity that renders you powerless when you become the object of "that" glance.

"Another part of my continuing attraction to Paul is his energetic stage presence. Here - hopping around stage, cracking jokes, maybe even flirting a bit with the lucky few in the first row - it becomes difficult to remember that Paul is in his sixties! Paul seems to really come alive on stage, and in drawing energy from the fans he only becomes more irresistible.

"Perhaps the most sexually attractive thing about Paul, at least for me, is just considering the "whole package." How can you not be attracted to a man who also promotes several good causes? His good will and charm only enhance his appeal! Paul is someone I can admire for both his personal and professional achievements as well as his looks and
personality, and that makes him a true object of affection."

From Beatlefan:

"Paul simply exudes sexiness! That look, that wink, that boyish grin makes him scrumptdeliumptous to this day! Not to mention how his hands move over the guitar or piano keys, oh baby! His voice is pure "magic", and makes you glad all over, a "call of the wild" if you will! Complete chemistry *is* James Paul McCartney!"

Young love

From Beverly:

"I was 13 years old when I fell in love with Paul. For all of the reasons that everyone has already mentioned.............his funny smile, his quick wit, his great body movements when he is playing guitar are so sensuous, he is definitely the sexiest man alive and I am amazed that he's never been on the cover of people magazine as such! But what really drives me wild about Paul are his voice and lyrics................whether it was his anger in "looking through you," or his pure love in "maybe I'm amazed" to the sadness of the "long & winding road" and I am not referring to the Specter version........but to the pure Paul * piano version........brings tears to my eyes every time. He is a renaissance man to me, talented in so many areas and strong and vulnerable as well. To this day, he has that underlying vulnerability that is so attractive."

From Sue:

"Keep Paul off the polar ice caps...we got enough problems with global warming as it is. Wheeeew...."

2dognight:

"The magic of the man never ceases to amaze."

Frances summed it all up neatly:

"The reason I believe Paul McCartney is still sexy...he is a romantic at heart and love is what it is all about."
http://www.examiner.com/x-2082-Beatles-Examiner~y2009m1d27-Paul-McCartney--still-sexy-after-all-these-years

Bill is not particularly attractive to women.

Tell that to all those women, above, then! :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

And what about this:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_14.jpg

Matchmaker.com and Amor.com members weighed in on sexy sixty-something celebrities.

Singles ranging in age from 18 - 55+ voted for the sexagenarian they would
most want to date - and Susan Sarandon, Richard Gere, Paul McCartney and Cher
came out on top.

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_15.jpg
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS123937+08-Apr-2009+PRN20090408

Bill is not particularly attractive to women.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_40.gif

Yeah, Paul McCartney only came FIRST and beat that "ugly" Richard Gere and that "creepy" Al Pacino in a women's SEXIEST man poll. :rolleyes:

Your nonsense never ceases to amaze me, failcon. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

socrates

04-09-2009, 03:17 AM

lol - you're the one who doesn't notice those freckles don't match.

Show us some actual evidence that they don't match.

You won't, of course. :rolleyes:

This is just yet another example of 'PID World' - you just say something you want to believe and it magically becomes 'true' for you.

Other people live in the real world.

Maybe you'll come and join us one day....

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 03:19 AM

Obviously, Focrates finds Paul & Bill equally attractive - not that there's anything wrong w/ that :D

It's ok if you have a little man-crush, Foc. No one is judging you for that here :D

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 03:30 AM

I know what Faulcon means by Slimy, you can just tell the presence of the two are different.

He's got the whole used car salesman thing going:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1978_June15th_03.jpg

I'm a guy so I can't make a judgement call on looks like Socrates can, but I sure as hell can tell the difference between masculine and effeminate.

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/olderFaul.jpg

Paul was VERY cool

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_cig.jpg

bulletproofheart

04-09-2009, 04:11 AM

Well Cilla Black dropped a big hint.

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 05:40 AM

Well Cilla Black dropped a big hint.

Pray tell :)

Some of us think Sheryl Crow did, too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6zIEfSxqkg

"All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die,
Says the man next to me out of nowhere
It's apropos
Of nothing
He says his name's William but I'm sure,
He's Bill or Billy or Mac or Buddy
And he's plain ugly to me
And I wonder if he's ever had a day of fun in his whole
life..."

To quote an apropos song: "I see right through your plastic Mac."
"Substitute" - The Who

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/p8869993.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

04-09-2009, 06:01 AM

Not PID, but this is classic SNL w/ Eddie Murphy as Clarence, the "most dominant" Beatle:

http://video.aol.ca/video-detail/the-5th-beatle/2421529123

phrased eyebrow

04-09-2009, 08:29 AM

It was relevant enough, thanks for the trip.
There was John's message, and now I can't wait to see the Afro-Paul / 'fro-Faul comparisons

boots

04-09-2009, 12:34 PM

Pray tell :)

Some of us think Sheryl Crow did, too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6zIEfSxqkg
"All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die,
Says the man next to me out of nowhere
It's apropos
Of nothing
He says his name's William but I'm sure,
He's Bill or Billy or Mac or Buddy
And he's plain ugly to me
And I wonder if he's ever had a day of fun in his whole
life..."

To quote an apropos song: "I see right through your plastic Mac."
"Substitute" - The Who

WHAT!!! What!!

Clutching at straws here.

Sheryl Crow was singing about being in a bar with another loner.

The Who were singing about the the falseness of social norms.

You think we look pretty good together
You think my shoes are made of leather

But I'm a substitute for another guy
I look pretty tall but my heels are high
The simple things you see are all complicated
I look pretty young, but I'm just back-dated, yeah

Substitute your lies for fact
I can see right through your plastic mac
I look all white, but my dad was black
My fine looking suit is really made out of sack

I was born with a plastic spoon in my mouth
The north side of my town faced east, and the east was facing south
And now you dare to look me in the eye
Those crocodile tears are what you cry
It's a genuine problem, you won't try
To work it out at all you just pass it by, pass it by

Substitute me for him
Substitute my coke for gin
Substitute you for my mum
At least I'll get my washing done

Taken your medication today?

Fair fuck.n dinkum if you come up with shit like this to promote the lies of PID, then you need to see a doctor.

I'm wondering. Are you a disinfo agent???

.

seaofgreen

04-09-2009, 02:25 PM

Obviously, Focrates finds Paul & Bill equally attractive - not that there's anything wrong w/ that :D

It's ok if you have a little man-crush, Foc. No one is judging you for that here :D
Yet another non sequitur and veiled insult that does nothing but expose your own prejudices and innate inability to take part in reasoned discussion.

fireman

04-09-2009, 04:43 PM

ivgg

04-09-2009, 06:06 PM

Obviously, Focrates finds Paul & Bill equally attractive - not that there's anything wrong w/ that :D

It's ok if you have a little man-crush, Foc. No one is judging you for that here :D

PID'ers are strange.

First they claim "Faul" has a more muscular body.

Second they claim Paul is more attractive.

Isn't it a well-known fact that women prefer men with muscular body's?

I'm not a woman, but I know what women like.

humito

04-09-2009, 06:20 PM

humito

04-09-2009, 06:47 PM

He's got the whole used car salesman thing going:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1978_June15th_03.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/olderFaul.jpg

Paul was VERY cool

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/paul_cig.jpg

are you conditioned into believing smoking fags with shades on is cool!??

while you are here faulcon, i am still patiently waiting for the photographs you said you had showing pauls extensive surgery scars?? it been a few months now.......have you found them yet ?

also i am still waiting for a PID proponant to give an example of one beatles or paul solo song that promotes an evil agenda?

seaofgreen

04-09-2009, 06:59 PM

Why don't you just look at his right ear? If that looks normal to you, then I think we've gained some insight into your eye for detail...

Okay, let's look at his right ear then:

http://img42.exs.cx/img42/5940/earcompare1.jpg

http://img58.exs.cx/img58/3893/ear.gif

Looks pretty normal to me.

socrates

04-09-2009, 07:10 PM

Obviously, Focrates finds Paul & Bill equally attractive - not that there's anything wrong w/ that :D

And where did I say I found him attractive?

More lies from you.

It's ok if you have a little man-crush, Foc. No one is judging you for that here :D

Veiled, homophobic ridicule now failcon?

Is there anything you won't stoop to in your promotion of PID? :(

socrates

04-09-2009, 07:11 PM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/CB63633E997E11DEBA81F217DC90F874.jpg

ivgg

04-09-2009, 07:19 PM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/CB63633E997E11DEBA81F217DC90F874.jpg

http://www.examiner.com/x-2082-Beatles-Examiner~y2009m1d27-Paul-McCartney--still-sexy-after-all-these-years

ivgg

04-09-2009, 07:21 PM

But let's go on-topic again.

The subject is not "Is Paul Sexy?", it's "Is Paul Dead?"

He is alive. That's my opinion.

socrates

04-09-2009, 07:25 PM

Obviously, Focrates finds Paul & Bill equally attractive - not that there's anything wrong w/ that :D

It's ok if you have a little man-crush, Foc. No one is judging you for that here :D

Yet another non sequitur and veiled insult that does nothing but expose your own prejudices and innate inability to take part in reasoned discussion.

True.

dedesuperman

04-09-2009, 07:31 PM

What is "strange" about it?

And so what if you can't find Paul making it in earlier renditions?

Is he supposed to make the exact same expressions every time he sings it? :eek::confused:

Here's a similar expression:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/surprised.jpg

If he moves his lower jaw sideways a little, it will be more or less the same.

They could be cosmetic surgery scars from a few years ago. They could be lines caused by his expression or just age lines.

When you get older you get lines on your face. :D

Can you see any surgery scars here:

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/JPSP1.jpg

I don't see any "scars."

Sorry but your explanation is weak, the way that Faul moves its jaw is unusual I don't see Paul by no means making it! Be honest socrates you see well that Faul doesn't resemble in anything to Paul accepts the evidence about that. It is obvious enough that Paul never had this kind of mimic. Then the one that pretends to be Paul is only a poor copy it made me think about the 'Multiplicity' movie with Michael Keaton, the more you made a copy of the original more he becomes imperfect with flaws. This is the plot summary of this movies: A comedy about a man who clones himself to save his marriage, and then almost loses his wife-- to himself! Overworked and over-scheduled, contractor Doug Kinney never has enough time for his wife and family. So when a helpful geneticist offers to "xerox" Doug, it seems like the perfect solution-- until the clones begin to take over his home, his job, and his bed.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117108/

I would not be seduced as you to believe that the supposedly Paul is the original because he is different in his mannerism. Maybe that you give a certain explanation or assuming that it's cause by old age concerning the scars around the mouth but it is necessary to admit that it is strange that he is located right side up according to the theory of PID that he would have had the plastic surgery.

dedesuperman

04-09-2009, 07:54 PM

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Faulsjaw-1.jpg

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/ScarFaul-1.jpg

socrates

04-09-2009, 08:44 PM

Sorry but your explanation is weak,

Just the type of answer I expected, and I why I knew it would be pointless answering your question. :rolleyes:

the way that Faul moves its jaw is unusual

So what?

Please post some more photos/videos of 'Faul' making this same jaw movement on other occasions if you think it is a significant mannerism of his.

Can you?

I don't see Paul by no means making it!

So what?

I would not be seduced as you to believe that the supposedly Paul is the original because he is different in his mannerism.

Not true:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNhTU6iBzDk&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaccafunhouse%2Eproboards%2Ecom% 2Findex%2Ecgi%3Fboard%3Dpid%26action%3Ddisplay%26t hread%3D3849&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNjpxr2_sGg&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaccafunhouse%2Eproboards%2Ecom% 2Findex%2Ecgi%3Fboard%3Dpid%26action%3Ddisplay%26t hread%3D3849&feature=player_embedded

Maybe that you give a certain explanation or assuming that it's cause by old age concerning the scars around the mouth but it is necessary to admit that it is strange that he is located right side up according to the theory of PID that he would have had the plastic surgery.

Well, why don't you post some pics of 'Faul' showing the SAME scars in late '67 and early 1970's then?

If he had surgery, then they would show up a lot clearer at the time he had it, wouldn't they?

But you don't do that, do you?

No, instead, you post a photo of an OLD and wrinkly Paul, around 40 years AFTER the alleged surgery and then highlight some lines on his face and proclaim that they are evidence of PID surgery! :rolleyes:

socrates

04-09-2009, 08:54 PM

For All PIDDERS (and Failcon, especially):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQphZnEpFdo

:D

seaofgreen

04-09-2009, 09:09 PM

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Faulsjaw-1.jpg
Sorry but your explanation is weak, the way that Faul moves its jaw is unusual I don't see Paul by no means making it!.
'66 Paul makes the jaw move at 1:13 in the video.

fireman

04-09-2009, 09:48 PM

are you conditioned to believe that smoking a fag wearing shades is cool ?
:rolleyes:

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

:p:) Best post ever!

ar20

05-09-2009, 01:03 AM

PID was mentioned with Cilla Black on the One Show in Britain just the other day.

Gee, it sure is dead huh? That's 2 articles, wired magazine, Letterman and the One Show within the last month.

:rolleyes:

Socrates, I've laid down a challenge 3 times and haven't been answered and you think I'm going to wade through your joke-like comparisons and pick them apart?

Please... when we start seeing eye to eye and start a fresh then we'll talk.

ar20

05-09-2009, 01:05 AM

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

:p:) Best post ever!

Are you conditioned to believe BILL is cool?

Methinks you are.

Oh and by the way, it's in the Rock and Roll manual that shades + cigs is cool.

Don't ask why, it just is. ;)

ar20

05-09-2009, 01:11 AM

socrates

05-09-2009, 02:09 AM

http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/3888/faulisalive.gif

I'm going to keep posting this until it sinks into you thick skulled troglodytes.

This is physically, anotomically and illogically impossible, ok? You can come back with any fades you want, frankly -- this says what needs to be said.

How can you sit there straight faced and say this is the same guy?

Without resorting to age, haircuts and all the rest of your nonsense. Sorry, even with additional hair and aging people do not change that much. They keep the definition of what makes them -- them.

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7350/jimpage.gif

Blind people telling seeing people they're blind... god, the irony is too rich for me.

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/aNOTHERGREATFADE.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/diverse%20photos/blink1221.gif

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_19.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/fade020709.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/many_years.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paulqe3_fade.gif

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_20.jpg

socrates

05-09-2009, 02:48 AM

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3931/eyes5.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/FPisBACK.jpg

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/Paul1966mag12_2.gif

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/1954/psfadevx9.gif

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/fade.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/paulage4-1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/faulorpaul1.gif

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/Copyofbigbrowneyes_comp.gif

50% overlay:

http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/Copyofbigbrowneyes_fiddy.gif

How can you sit there straight faced and say this is the same guy?

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 04:03 AM

PID was mentioned with Cilla Black on the One Show in Britain just the other day.

Gee, it sure is dead huh? That's 2 articles, wired magazine, Letterman and the One Show within the last month.
Oh, yeah. That's awesome :p

Used car salesman

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967Drums.jpg

Rock star

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paulvs.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 04:04 AM

For All PIDDERS (and Failcon, especially):

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/ontheramp.jpg
:p

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 04:07 AM

Are you conditioned to believe BILL is cool?

Methinks you are.

Oh, yeah, Bill was SO COOL he tucked his pants into his socks :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/onbike.jpg

Paul was cool. Bill was/is not.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/paulbike.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 05:02 AM

Posted by Focrates:
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/CB63633E997E11DEBA81F217DC90F874.jpg

Like I said, Foc, I don't claim to know what a gay man finds attractive. If you think Bill is attractive... Hey, to each his own. :p

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/Beatlesphotos/SirPaul.jpg

But Paul was definitely hot. No argument there.

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/paulacoustic.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 05:34 AM

Check out this interview:

An interview with Francie Schwartz
The author of "Body Count" talks about life with John, Yoko, Ringo, George and Paul

... After John Lennon's assassination, official culture vulture historians began to rewrite history... and Paul McCartney started rewriting John's official biography every chance he got. I slowly smouldered and built up to a blazing rage by the early 90's. Vanity Fair misrepresented me in 1990 in an article about Linda during which she made the oft-repeated assertion that people gave John credit for things that Paul actually wrote. The writer of the piece retold the myth about Jane breaking up with Paul when she found us in bed together, and even misspelled my name (probably deliberately)...

When Paul's "evil twin" was running things in the studio, or just being cold to me in front of the others, George would emotionally rescue me...

http://abbeyrd.best.vwh.net/francie.htm

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 08:43 AM

Oh, yeah, Bill was SO COOL he tucked his pants into his socks :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/onbike.jpg

Paul was cool. Bill was/is not.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/paulbike.jpg

Sigh, your ignorance is exceeded only by your foolhardiness -- see if you can get someone to explain to you what a chain-guard is.

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 08:54 AM

Posted by Focrates:

Like I said, Foc, I don't claim to know what a gay man finds attractive. If you think Bill is attractive... Hey, to each his own. :p

But Paul was definitely hot. No argument there.

Faulcon, do us all a favor by creating some threads elsewhere for your thoughts on gay men and what's "hot".

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 09:08 AM

Check out this interview:

Why, can't you assimilate it yourself?

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 09:15 AM

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 10:17 AM

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Paulvs.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967Drums.jpg

From MMT:
http://i604.photobucket.com/albums/tt130/skyofblue/1.jpg

toty1994

05-09-2009, 10:31 AM

Posted by Focrates:
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/CB63633E997E11DEBA81F217DC90F874.jpg

Like I said, Foc, I don't claim to know what a gay man finds attractive. If you think Bill is attractive... Hey, to each his own. :p

I assume you're just trying to poke fun at socrates here. However, given the poll above was about who women find attractive it rather undermines both your 'joke' and your 'Paul hot/Faul not' reasoning at the same time.

magnolia_xx

05-09-2009, 02:52 PM

Hey, I was not online for a few days and I found tons of messages about what Faulcon considers "hot"! That's what I really needed to know! LOL
I would like to share a few videos from the 1984 movie "Give My Regards To Broad Street".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXR6RhF6Vn8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-orfyCwhCA

It seems that Paul McCartney, at the age of 42, still had the same protruding ears he had before his supposed "death" (LOL) in 1966...
BTW I am a woman and I think that he looked really hot in these videos ;)

socrates

05-09-2009, 03:41 PM

Oh, yeah, Bill was SO COOL he tucked his pants into his socks :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/onbike.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/paulbike.jpg

Sigh, your ignorance is exceeded only by your foolhardiness -- see if you can get someone to explain to you what a chain-guard is.

http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_40.gif

socrates

05-09-2009, 04:12 PM

Posted by Focrates:
http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/CB63633E997E11DEBA81F217DC90F874.jpg

I assume you're just trying to poke fun at socrates here. However, given the poll above was about who women find attractive it rather undermines both your 'joke' and your 'Paul hot/Faul not' reasoning at the same time.

She doesn't get that, though - that's the problem here. :rolleyes:

It kinda highlights her muddled reasoning process.

She makes a claim that "Faul isn't particularly attractive to women".

So I prove her claim wrong by highlighting a website which quotes various women saying 'Faul' is still hot.

I also quote a poll in which women have voted 'Faul' joint sexiest man.

From that, Failcon somehow infers that I'm gay! :eek: :confused:

It just shows you that she cannot reason logically and rationally. She absorbs information and then amalgamates it to form a nonsensical conclusion with total disregard to syllogism and rationale.

socrates

05-09-2009, 04:20 PM

PID was mentioned with Cilla Black on the One Show in Britain just the other day.

Gee, it sure is dead huh? That's 2 articles, wired magazine, Letterman and the One Show within the last month.

Er, it's called the "silly season" for a reason.

It also happens to be the 40th anniversary of the PID hoax hitting the media.

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 05:49 PM

It also happens to be the 40th anniversary of the PID hoax hitting the media.
Ah yes, must be time for this then:
http://chainedandperfumed.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/paul-is-dead-batman.jpg

the squire of gothos

05-09-2009, 06:03 PM

Holy Urban Legend Batman!!!

seaofgreen

05-09-2009, 07:02 PM

Hey, I was not online for a few days and I found tons of messages about what Faulcon considers "hot"! That's what I really needed to know! LOL

Don't worry, you've not missed much -- just the usual nonsense :)

I would like to share a few videos from the 1984 movie "Give My Regards To Broad Street".

It seems that Paul McCartney, at the age of 42, still had the same protruding ears he had before his supposed "death" (LOL) in 1966...

Ah, but they had superglue by then -- maybe that's what he's using to keep his fake ears at the correct angle! ;)

magnolia_xx

05-09-2009, 08:39 PM

Don't worry, you've not missed much -- just the usual nonsense :)

Ah, but they had superglue by then -- maybe that's what he's using to keep his fake ears at the correct angle! ;)

LOL this is what "they" will say! I can't wait for this! :D

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 10:12 PM

Paul - "Paul" from SF Aug 29, 1966 - Bill

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/PaulFaulEvolution.jpg

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 10:14 PM

Thanks to Ar20 for bringing this to my attention:

After the Magical Mystery Tour recordings, Evans flew to Nice with McCartney to film The Fool on the Hill film clip, although McCartney had set off without luggage or a passport.[30] McCartney got past customs by saying “You know who I am”, but he and Evans were not allowed into the hotel restaurant in Nice because they, “didn't look the part”, and had to eat dinner in Evans’ room.[30] Because the money they had with them had been spent on clothes, and NEMS was supposed to send them more, they arranged for credit over two nights in a nightclub: "We took advantage of our credit standing, as money had still not arrived from England. News about Paul's [McCartney] visit to the club the previous night had spread, and the place was jammed. Now Paul, being a generous sort of person, had built up quite a bar bill, when the real manager of the club arrived demanding that we pay immediately. On explaining who Paul was and what had happened, he answered, 'You either pay the bill, or I call the police.' It certainly looked like we were going to get thrown in jail. It was ironical, sitting in a club with a millionaire, unable to pay the bill."[30]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal_Evans

humito

05-09-2009, 10:15 PM

surgery scar pics please faulcon?

faulconandsnowjob

05-09-2009, 10:22 PM

Bill's eyes are not the same color as Paul's

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Plaid.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/truePaul-1.jpg

the squire of gothos

05-09-2009, 10:26 PM

Paul - "Paul" from SF Aug 29, 1966 - Bill

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/PaulFaulEvolution.jpg

You have to actually post the "undoctored" version of the photo you believed to be tampered. Showing a side by side with a pic with a totally different expression is another completely worthless comparison you have brought us.

Well, to be fair, it's not totally worthless. Without any actual evidence of "doctoring", the center and right pics here are excellent PIA proof.

the squire of gothos

05-09-2009, 10:32 PM

Bill's eyes are not the same color as Paul's

Sure they are.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v354/LarryC/MaccaPics/eyecolor.jpg

the squire of gothos

05-09-2009, 11:07 PM

Funny thing about that "hooked nose" that Paul had in the '70's pic.

It seems to be dependant on the angle of the photo and his expression.

Imagine that. Soft tissue can change based on expression. :D

Oh, and completely consistent through the years.

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/the_nose_knows.jpg

Ever notice that the pidders almost always use pics of Paul's head tilted up, and "Faul's" head tilted down?

I wonder why? ;)

the squire of gothos

05-09-2009, 11:19 PM

Boy, those 1960's plastic surgeons must of had to bash the hell out of yucky ole' Faul's skull to reconstruct the lovely JPM's odd facial symmetry so perfectly. Something like that must take several years. No. Strike that. Several weeks to heal completely.

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/symmetry7yq.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/comps/symmetry-1.jpg

humito

05-09-2009, 11:22 PM

formosan termite

05-09-2009, 11:28 PM

Bill's eyes are not the same color as Paul's

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/Plaid.jpg

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/truePaul-1.jpg

How daft can you be?

Paul has hazel eyes. That means they can look green or gray or brown. We have been through this over and over.

Hazel
This iris shows a mixture of brown, green, and amber colors.

Hazel eyes are due to a combination of Rayleigh scattering and a moderate amount of melanin in the iris' anterior border layer.[7][25] Hazel eyes often appear to shift in color from a light brown to a dark golden-green. A number of studies using three-point scales have assigned hazel to be the medium-color between the lightest shade of blue and darkest shade of brown. Hazel mostly consists of Brown and Green. The dominant color in the eye can either be green or light brown/gold.[46][47][48][49][50][51][52] This can sometimes produce a multicolored iris, i.e., an eye that is light brown near the pupil and charcoal or amber/dark green on the outer part of the iris (and vice versa) when observed in sunlight.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_color#Hazel

So the fact that you can find pictures that show eyes of different color is no surprise. It is to be expected.

Hazel eyes can look green.

btw. Hazel eyes can look green.

formosan termite

05-09-2009, 11:36 PM

Thanks to Ar20 for bringing this to my attention:

Full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

formosan termite

05-09-2009, 11:40 PM

Oh, yeah, Bill was SO COOL he tucked his pants into his socks :p

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v419/TheFaker/onbike.jpg

Paul was cool. Bill was/is not.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v204/WlarusGirl/paulbike.jpg

LOL! This is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen posted. I have gotten my long pants caught in a bicycle chain when I was a kid. I have had to do the same thing. But in the one of Paul, the bike has a chain guard, so he didn't need to tuck the pants into his socks.

Ladies and gentlemen.

This is another fine example of the Pidders' great attention to detail. LOL!:rolleyes:

formosan termite

05-09-2009, 11:43 PM

Welcome to the squire of gothos. LOL! Live long and prosper.

formosan termite

05-09-2009, 11:59 PM

I've already walked people through how those photos have been tampered w/ several times. You could try training your eye to pick up on things like that.

There is a thread on tampered photos here:
http://only1rad.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=plastic&action=display&thread=606

No. You have to post the "undoctored" photo next to the "doctored" one and explain what has been tampered with. You have not done that.

formosan termite

06-09-2009, 12:15 AM

Why don't you just look at his right ear? If that looks normal to you, then I think we've gained some insight into your eye for detail...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v41/CorporateA/1967_JuneBeatlesBook_BillySmile.jpg

Geez, you can barely see it. Are you saying the illuminati tampered with the photo to make the ear look really strange. Why wouldn't they tamper with it to make it look normal.

And we will not be lectured about our attention to detail by someone who:

- Stated flatly that Paul's eyes were brown when Paul himself said in 1965 that they are hazel. (Oh and hazel eyes can and often do look green. We have offered much proof of that)
- Stated flatly that Paul had no freckles, even though pictures you posted of Paul showed he had freckles.
- Said that Paul's hair always went from left to right and Faul's always is right to left, while showing photos in the same post of post '66 Paul's hair going left to right. (Including photos you show of "Faul" on the previous page.)
- Stated flatly that hazel eyes can never look green. Even after we posted several links showing otherwise. Including from the Stanford Department of Medicine.
- Called the photo of 1966 Paul, Bill.
- Stated that Paul's eyes NEVER looked green. Even though we posted several pictures of pre '67 Paul with green eyes.
- Then that silly comp of Paul on the bikes where the one he has his pants tucked in the bike has no chain guard, and the one of Paul with the pants not tucked in, the bike has a chain guard. LOL!

Some attention to detail.:rolleyes:

socrates

06-09-2009, 12:26 AM

Going back to this comp:

http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/F_200705_May16ed_im_254851a.jpg

Not only is Billy's mouth wider.....

Paul...

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/PaulFaulEvolution.jpg

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

formosan termite

06-09-2009, 12:28 AM

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/PaulFaulEvolution.jpg

http://images.zaazu.com/img/daze-male-cross-eye-dizzy-smiley-emoticon-000296-large.gif

Absolutely amazing how a smile makes the mouth wider. I learned that when I was like, 3 years old.

socrates

06-09-2009, 12:31 AM

socrates

06-09-2009, 12:39 AM

Welcome to the squire of gothos. LOL! Live long and prosper.

http://upload.project-j.nl/uploads/ScreenHunter_23.jpg

:D

socrates

06-09-2009, 12:41 AM

surgery scar pics please faulcon?

http://www.bauerphoto.com/adport/adpics/mDevil.JPG

socrates

06-09-2009, 12:46 AM

faulconandsnowjob

06-09-2009, 01:35 AM

Rock star

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/earlyjohnandpauly.jpg

Used car salesman

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Faul_bop.jpg

socrates

06-09-2009, 01:41 AM

Rock star

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/earlyjohnandpauly.jpg

Used car salesman

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a386/Beatlesagain/Faul_bop.jpg

Yawn. Give this 'rockstar, 'car salesman' crap a rest, will you?

Is this what you have been reduced to posting now?

Pathetic, really.

You'll be posting a photo of a bass with the word 'Bill' on soon....

formosan termite

06-09-2009, 03:10 AM

Yawn. Give this 'rockstar, 'car salesman' crap a rest, will you?

Is this what you have been reduced to posting now?

Pathetic, really.

You'll be posting a photo of a bass with the word 'Bill' on soon....

You are right, Socrates.

This is just foolishness, now.

And they called us desperate! :rolleyes::D

mind1universe

06-09-2009, 03:26 AM

faulconandsnowjob

06-09-2009, 04:57 AM

Rock star

http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii220/truecolors112/part%202/10.jpg

Used car salesman

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/ladygamer/st150ca.jpg

:p

seaofgreen

06-09-2009, 08:59 AM

Used car salesman

Rock star

Rock star

Used car salesman

Rock star

Used car salesman

Tell me faulcon, do you see a used car salesman here?
http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/2-1.gif

Perhaps you see used car salesmen in your dreams?
How about in your nightmares?

dedesuperman

06-09-2009, 09:06 AM

Just the type of answer I expected, and I why I knew it would be pointless answering your question. :rolleyes:

So what?

Please post some more photos/videos of 'Faul' making this same jaw movement on other occasions if you think it is a significant mannerism of his.

Can you?

So what?

Not true:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNhTU6iBzDk&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaccafunhouse%2Eproboards%2Ecom% 2Findex%2Ecgi%3Fboard%3Dpid%26action%3Ddisplay%26t hread%3D3849&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNjpxr2_sGg&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaccafunhouse%2Eproboards%2Ecom% 2Findex%2Ecgi%3Fboard%3Dpid%26action%3Ddisplay%26t hread%3D3849&feature=player_embedded

Well, why don't you post some pics of 'Faul' showing the SAME scars in late '67 and early 1970's then?

If he had surgery, then they would show up a lot clearer at the time he had it, wouldn't they?

But you don't do that, do you?

No, instead, you post a photo of an OLD and wrinkly Paul, around 40 years AFTER the alleged surgery and then highlight some lines on his face and proclaim that they are evidence of PID surgery! :rolleyes:

Hey socrates! I insist saying than only Faul makes this kind of particular movement as if his jaw was dislocated. I never saw Paul making it with his jaw. Also I find another one check on Youtube 'Yesterday Wings Live 1975' at 1:09 for the first screen cap and 1:53 for the other one. It is recommended to see some second before the indicated time.

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Fauljaw1975-1.jpg

http://i905.photobucket.com/albums/ac251/andre1960/Fauljaw1975a-1.jpg

And concerning the scars, it is surely obvious that the scars freshly made by the plastic surgery have been hidden by the make-up so that no one questions themselves of this sudden apparition. It is not necessary to forget that the first apparition of Faul in December 1966 (according to the theory of PID) he appears with a mustache and next a beard an ingenious way that doesn't bring any suspicions because it seems normal. They had surely find a way to hide them when Faul appears in public also is not easy to notice these scars with the black and white picture (before having the opportunity that the color becomes as much accessible in the magazines, pictures and television) and I suppose that it is more difficult to discern it. But we can always tampered the pictures (especially in color: because the color permits to see in depth the details ) so that they don't appears maybe it is by luck I find this picture. I admit that the one that I show to you has a gap of 40 years but anyway the particular scar close to the commisure of the mouth is rather strange. :confused: Maybe they must exist other pictures with the scar but it is necessary that I find them. At the moment I have the one that you saw. Don't worry if I see another one I will post it!

Most artists who go on the stage make themselves spread the face with the makeup.:p

seaofgreen

06-09-2009, 09:11 AM

They think they're going to be able to stop the truth from coming out
__________________
Forensic science has proven Paul McCartney was replaced in 1966.

Geez, make your mind up will you.

dedesuperman

06-09-2009, 09:15 AM

'66 Paul makes the jaw move at 1:13 in the video.

hi seaofgreen! I went to see the time indicated by you to 1:13 but unfortunately Paul doesn't especially make the same movement that Faul. The one of Faul is very particular.

seaofgreen

06-09-2009, 09:29 AM

hi seaofgreen! I went to see the time indicated by you to 1:13 but unfortunately Paul doesn't especially make the same movement that Faul. The one of Faul is very particular.
Well it looked similar in the quick glance I gave it, but as has been said, just because you don't see him do it doesn't mean he's not capable of it -- anyone can move their jaw to the side. Or maybe he "learnt" to do it over time as part of improving his breathing whilst singing -- very important for singers not to damage their vocal cords.

toty1994

06-09-2009, 10:36 AM

This like hangman.

Can anyone guess the sentence

It's three words.

Can anyone give me a letter and lets really make this bullshit more obvious. Bullshitters will always bullshit even when people know the truth.

So I'm going to start with this:D
_ a _ _ / _ s / _ l _ v e?? I'm guessing this is not what you had in mind, mind.

The BBC are broadcasting a series of docs for their 'Beatles week', which started last night. Doesn't look like there's one specifically about the PiD rumours but I dare say it'll get a mention somewhere.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/tv/features/beatlesweek/

the squire of gothos

06-09-2009, 12:10 PM

It's easy to find unflattering pictures of Paul in any era.

What does it prove.

Nothing except:

That I'm trying to be funny, and Faulcon can't help herself. ;)

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/2452/rockstr1.jpg (http://img6.imageshack.us/i/rockstr1.jpg/)

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/5467/rockstar2j.jpg

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n20/khanmfh/fades/huh.gif