Richard C. Hoagland....did they land or not???

[venividivici2311]

Has anyone ever read his book,Dark Mission???
Im reading it know,but its damn hard,not from a difficult way,but by understanding,he has some things right,the books starts with cydonia.
Those things i could follow,ive read about it more.

But then he goes to the glass domes and towers on the moon...
All fine,allot of pictures shown,but none of them resemble a tower,or shard of some kind,to me it all looks like smudges.He goes on about the textures,the light that causes prisms and such,but i really can't see them,you know how difficult its to read something you don't quite see or understand....:confused:

http://www.hallofthegods.org/2009/06/moon-anomalies-shard.html

http://assets.anomalies.netdna-cdn.com/ion/docs-pub/IO/741/shard-ww2.jpg

He's saying that the whole story about the fake moon landing is a disinfo campaign to keep your eyes of this subject,but to my understanding,if nasa don't want us to see buildings on the moon,WHY DO THEY TAKE PICTURES OF THEM???:confused:

Is it worth my time reading the whole book,or is it all just disinfo???
I could use some advice!:D

[merlincove]

Van allen belts!!

No way did they go to the moon!!

Welcome to the threads, hogster :-)

What do we 'know' about the van allen belts, excatly?

We know what scientists and grey beards tell us.

What do we 'know' about the lunar landings, exactly?

We know what NASA and other grey beards tell us.

Why then trust in one bunch of scientists and not another?

There is a lot of evidence to say that NASA did indeed put men on the moon.

There is actually very little other than speculation to prove otherwise.

[bsmurph83]

fair call from merlincove.

in answer to the OP, yes, fuckin' read it! lol

i've been wanting to get dark mission for a while now, already being familiar with some of its contents. read it, hoagland is an independent researcher, thus, he is not motivated by doing what his corporate or governmental masters tell him.

also check out: www.marsanomalyresearch.com

my advice is pay attention to what hoagland says about life and structures on other planets. don't have to believe 100% but definitely pay attention. there are many who would try to steer you away from people like him (gatekeepers).

also, watch Moon Rising by Hose Escamilla! (if you haven't already) brilliant. just google it :cool:

[venividivici2311]

fair call from merlincove.

in answer to the OP, yes, fuckin' read it! lol

i've been wanting to get dark mission for a while now, already being familiar with some of its contents. read it, hoagland is an independent researcher, thus, he is not motivated by doing what his corporate or governmental masters tell him.

also check out: www.marsanomalyresearch.com

my advice is pay attention to what hoagland says about life and structures on other planets. don't have to believe 100% but definitely pay attention. there are many who would try to steer you away from people like him (gatekeepers).

also, watch Moon Rising by Hose Escamilla! (if you haven't already) brilliant. just google it :cool:

Finally,an answer to my question ;)i'll try to fuckin read it! :D
thanks for the advice and the link,i didn't really want to read the book if it was just disinfo,now that you enlightend me i can continue the book lol
I've watched moon rising,very compelling docu,a different aproach in stead of the msm bullsh*t.

[bard]

Has anyone ever read his book,Dark Mission???
Im reading it know,but its damn hard,not from a difficult way,but by understanding,he has some things right,the books starts with cydonia.
Those things i could follow,ive read about it more.

But then he goes to the glass domes and towers on the moon...
All fine,allot of pictures shown,but none of them resemble a tower,or shard of some kind,to me it all looks like smudges.He goes on about the textures,the light that causes prisms and such,but i really can't see them,you know how difficult its to read something you don't quite see or understand....:confused:

http://www.hallofthegods.org/2009/06/moon-anomalies-shard.html

http://assets.anomalies.netdna-cdn.com/ion/docs-pub/IO/741/shard-ww2.jpg

He's saying that the whole story about the fake moon landing is a disinfo campaign to keep your eyes of this subject,but to my understanding,if nasa don't want us to see buildings on the moon,WHY DO THEY TAKE PICTURES OF THEM???:confused:

Is it worth my time reading the whole book,or is it all just disinfo???
I could use some advice!:D

The glass domes and the prism effects in the Moon landing footage are explained by the use of the front-screen projection technique to fake the footage (apparently it was Stanley Kubrick who did it, under the orders of his fellow Masons). See here:

http://jayweidner.com/AlchemicalKubrickIIa.html

We had a thread on this some time ago:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=74477&highlight=Stanley+Kubrick

I also watched the "Moon rising" video but I found it to be way over the top. There are lots of craters on the Moon. These are probably due to plasma bombardment from the solar wind, not from meteorite impacts (the Moon has no internal magnetic field to protect itself from plasma streams, like the Earth does). The author of the "Moon rising" movie introduced some coloring in the footage, changed the contrast, and then mistook the bottom of the craters (which are mostly circular in shape and come in all sizes) to be the tops of flying saucers. It is a very foolish interpretation.

[skiver]

With the progression of realisation that, there was indeed no moon landings, I'm afraid Mr. Hoagland is looking more and more like a busted flush. :eek:

You want dis-info agents .....he's your man.

imho