PDA

View Full Version : 'I swear':Last-minute availability put Masons' Bib


always_rebel
01-09-2009, 12:42 AM
'I swear': Last-minute availability put Masons' Bible into history

By Patricia Zapor
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- As Ryan Johnson explains it, George Washington's inauguration ceremony was painstakingly planned down to the tiniest detail about seating arrangements -- with just one exception.

As the first president of the United States arrived at New York's City Hall by horse-drawn carriage and prepared to step onto the open balcony that April 30 in 1789, it belatedly occurred to organizers that there ought to be a Bible on which Washington could take the oath of office.

One of the men at hand, parade marshal Jacob Morton, also happened to be master of the St. John's Lodge No. 1 of the Masons and offered to provide one from the lodge, located nearby at the corner of Water and Wall streets. The organization's 1767 King James Version was rushed to the hall and opened to Genesis, at the end of Chapter 49 and the beginning of Chapter 50, where Washington placed his hand for the ceremony.

As he completed the oath written for the occasion, Washington added the unscripted words, "I swear, so help me God," and bowed to kiss the Bible.

Thus was born a tradition followed by almost every one of the 42 presidents inaugurated since then, including some who have used the very same Bible.

The volume is still owned by the St. John's Lodge, which Johnson serves as chairman of the George Washington Inaugural Bible Committee. He was one of three lodge members who escorted the Bible to Washington in January for it to be displayed as part of an inauguration exhibit at the National Archives.

At a Jan. 10 presentation at the Archives, Johnson explained that in the 1770s it was something of a luxury to have a copy of the Bible, let alone one of as high quality as the Masons' edition.

Prior to the nation's independence, no publisher in the colonies had been allowed to print Bibles, because the authorization of the King of England was needed. Like the Masons' Bible, those used in the fledgling republic tended to come from Europe and at great expense.

In commemoration of the new importance of the George Washington Inaugural Bible, as it came to be known, it soon had a new engraved image of the president inserted to face the opening page portrait of King George II.

Johnson said it was likely unintentional, but the use of the Masons' Bible for Washington's ceremony also may have dodged an ecumenical problem.

"No church's Bible would have been acceptable to people of the various denominations," he explained. By using one owned by a fraternal organization instead of a Bible from one of New York's 22 different churches, a potential disagreement over the president favoring one denomination over another was avoided, Johnson said.

In the two centuries since then, the Washington Bible has been used at a variety of national events, including other inaugurations, the dedication of the Washington Monument and the laying of the cornerstone of the U.S. Capitol building, Johnson said. Lodge rules also allow it to be used for various Masonic ceremonies and the inaugurations of New York governors.

Records weren't kept to indicate whether other early presidents may have used the Washington Bible for their inaugurations, but four in the 20th century did: Warren G. Harding in 1921, Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1953; Jimmy Carter in 1977 and George H.W. Bush in 1989. President George W. Bush had hoped to use it for his first inauguration in 2001, but the damp weather that day put a crimp in the plans.

Johnson explained that the Bible was brought to Washington for the ceremony, but the Secret Service wanted it in place on the podium an hour before the ceremony started.

Given the Bible's age and historic value, the Masons weren't willing to let it be exposed to the cold drizzle that long, so Bush used a family Bible.

Records kept by the Architect of the Capitol suggest only one president in the 216 years since Washington was inaugurated did not take the oath of office with one hand on a Bible. Franklin Pierce, the 14th president, "affirmed"-- but did not "swear" -- his oath with one hand on a law book, instead of a Bible. Some historical records say Pierce did so because of a crisis of faith after his only remaining child, an 11-year-old boy, was killed in a train accident a few weeks before the inauguration.

The nation's only Catholic president to date, John F. Kennedy, used his family's Douay Version of the Bible. The 1850 edition was brought by his Fitzgerald ancestors from Ireland, according to the John F. Kennedy Library in Boston. That Bible, a massive tome now on display at the library, was kept current with records of family births through the time of Kennedy's presidency.

There are some firm rules about the use and handling of the George Washington Bible. Only a president being sworn in is allowed to touch the pages of the Bible without gloves, for instance. But Johnson said one popular belief -- that it cannot travel by airplane -- is a myth.

The misconception that the Masons wouldn't allow it to be transported by airplane was based on the refusal of a previous grand master of the lodge to fly ever again after he returned from a stint in the military as a helicopter pilot, Johnson said. If he wouldn't fly, neither could the Bible when he was escorting it.

Gilbert Savitzky, grand secretary of the lodge, said the Masons do obtain special permission for the Bible not to be X-rayed for airport security, however. Instead, when it must be transported by air, arrangements are made for it to be inspected by hand, including being screened for explosives residue.

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0500250.htm

lase
01-09-2009, 03:14 AM
But i thought Washington wasn't the first president.

Wasn't there 8 others prior?

jason sands
01-09-2009, 03:25 AM
"No church's Bible would have been acceptable to people of the various denominations," he explained. By using one owned by a fraternal organization instead of a Bible from one of New York's 22 different churches, a potential disagreement over the president favoring one denomination over another was avoided, Johnson said."

MY RESPONSE:

I had no idea that each different denomination had THEIR OWN translation of the Bible specific to THEIR particular denomination. That is what this is inferring.

I find that difficult to believe

So the people had no problem accepting George Washington favoring Freemasonry over all the denominations at the time, eh? Hmmmmmm. Curious

jason sands
01-09-2009, 03:31 AM
But i thought Washington wasn't the first president.

Wasn't there 8 others prior?

If you go back far enough you'll find Fred Fintstone was the first Neolithic American president

Or was that cro-magnonic?



Um, you know who Fred Flinstone was, right? First stone-age president of the United States

rashhead
01-09-2009, 03:43 AM
Chinese wisphers...

I am not a devout holy person, but I believe what I see and interpret what I hear!

How can a book be so solid for so many years?

I trust a lot but believe a little.

nialldabass
01-09-2009, 03:44 AM
I think you'll find after the war of independance, the presidencey changed every year until Washington and the writing of the constitution

http://www.marshallhall.org/hanson.html

See how we are lied to at every turn

always_rebel
01-09-2009, 10:19 PM
I think you'll find after the war of independance, the presidencey changed every year until Washington and the writing of the constitution

http://www.marshallhall.org/hanson.html

See how we are lied to at every turn

Wow! Thanks for that. I had no idea.

Perhaps they keep it in the dark cos Washington was THEIR President?

eastbeast
02-09-2009, 02:46 PM
"No church's Bible would have been acceptable to people of the various denominations," he explained. By using one owned by a fraternal organization instead of a Bible from one of New York's 22 different churches, a potential disagreement over the president favoring one denomination over another was avoided, Johnson said."

MY RESPONSE:

I had no idea that each different denomination had THEIR OWN translation of the Bible specific to THEIR particular denomination. That is what this is inferring.

I find that difficult to believe [QUOTE]

It does sound that way, however I would think they would have had their own version of a 'Holy book' if they were different religions, as we all know at that itme people were entering the US from all over the World, bringing their religions with them and in some cases finding refuge from religious persecution therein.



[QUOTE=jason sands;1235900]
So the people had no problem accepting George Washington favoring Freemasonry over all the denominations at the time, eh? Hmmmmmm. Curious

Firstly as you know Freemasonry is not a religion, nor is it a substitute for one or any.
I think the point was that the Freemasonry provided book was considered non-denominational and so not favouring any particular religion.
As I belive was the custom back then and probably until recently, a person was considered unable to 'swear' an oath upon anything other than a 'Holy book'? Something to do with God being the ultimate Judge I suppose.

Anyway, its a difficult choice for a person to make, swear on a particular 'Holy book' and please / offend some, swear on a law book and please / offend some.

What would you do?

grandsecretary
02-09-2009, 03:08 PM
Firstly as you know Freemasonry is not a religion, nor is it a substitute for one or any.

1951 - The Free and Accepted Masons of the State of New York, by their Grand Officers and Representatives in Grand Lodge assembled, at an Annual Communication thereof, in accordance with existing Constitutions and Laws, do establish and promulgate the following Preamble and Constitution:

PREAMBLE

"As an expression of the simplest form of the faith of Masonry, not exhaustive, but incontrovertible and suggestive, the following is

THE MASONIC BELIEF

"There is one God, the Father of all men.
"The Holy Bible is the Great Light in Masonry, and the Rule and Guide for faith and practice.
"Man is immortal.
"Character determines destiny.
"Love of man is, next to love of God, man's first duty. Prayer, communion of man with God, is helpful.
"Recognizing the impossibility of confining the teaching of Masonry to any fixed forms of expression, yet acknowledging the value of authoritative statements of fundamental principles, the following is proclaimed as,

THE MASONIC TEACHING

"Masonry teaches man to practice charity and benevolence, to protect chastity, to respect the ties of blood and friendship, to adopt the principles and revere the ordinances of religion, to assist the feeble, guide the blind, raise-up the downtrodden, shelter the orphan, guard the altar, support the Government, inculcate morality, promote learning, love man, fear God, implore His mercy and hope for happiness." etc.

"According to the Old Charge, religion is, of course, the basis of Freemasonry, for, without it, there would be no Freemasonry as we have and value it.

"Religion, whatever its form is, makes for morality, right living, for the exemplification in daily practice of all that which its principles set forth in precept. In the natural religion, which is the foundation of our Craft, the Masonic belief and the Masonic teaching constitute an elementary system of morality and are thus a support of and an aid to all religions. If religion had no place whatever in the Craft we should and could not hold, as we now rightly do, that "there is one God; the Father of all men" and, equally and as a necessary corollary, that men living under the Fatherhood of the one God are brethren all. These two cardinal principles, it should be added, are fundamental to all civilized creeds and are thus essentially a part of the natural religion which is the basic ideal of our Craft.


IMHO you are very, very, confused with the entire concept of what Free Masonry is. Perhaps you ought to speak with your Brethren in New York? They will explain to you the "natural religion" that is the Moderns system of freemasonry, the "natural religion" of Spinoza and "The Enlightenment", anathema to all of the established religions of the world.

deathbeast
04-09-2009, 07:37 PM
you tell them GS, i have been reluctant to post on this site since i joined the other day because of the sheer numbers of deluded people on here.
I am a Freemason, a member of the Grand Lodge of antient free and accepted masons of Scotland.
I have heard the stories and the tales but i have never seen it, the reason i have never seen it is because it does not happen.

grandsecretary
04-09-2009, 09:21 PM
you tell them GS, i have been reluctant to post on this site since i joined the other day because of the sheer numbers of deluded people on here.
I am a Freemason, a member of the Grand Lodge of antient free and accepted masons of Scotland.
I have heard the stories and the tales but i have never seen it, the reason i have never seen it is because it does not happen.

Oh don't give up so easily. Say what you have to say. This is not Helmand Province. That is really dangerous.

always_rebel
05-09-2009, 02:03 AM
I have heard the stories and the tales but i have never seen it, the reason i have never seen it is because it does not happen.

You really made me laugh out loud :D

So if you don't see something it means it doesn't exist? :D

So what does electric current look like? What does oxygen look like>?

You are deluded youself to think that in 6 million masons (I guess, but there's probably much more) they will lead people like yourself into the depth of the cult. Who are you? Were your parents masons? Do you know any REALLY poewrful people personally and meet them? I mean presidents, prime ministers, politicians? Do you? All the rich and the famous? I doubt that. Even if you say you do, I won't believe you, cos if you were, you wouldn't come to this forum, would you? :D



.

deathbeast
05-09-2009, 04:12 PM
You really made me laugh out loud :D

So if you don't see something it means it doesn't exist? :D

So what does electric current look like? What does oxygen look like>?

You are deluded youself to think that in 6 million masons (I guess, but there's probably much more) they will lead people like yourself into the depth of the cult. Who are you? Were your parents masons? Do you know any REALLY poewrful people personally and meet them? I mean presidents, prime ministers, politicians? Do you? All the rich and the famous? I doubt that. Even if you say you do, I won't believe you, cos if you were, you wouldn't come to this forum, would you? :D
.

i am a first generation mason from my immediate family and 5th generation in my family as a whole, and for your own interest i move in circles that you don't (i assume ) i associate with heads of industry, sport and politics. and while i was a serving soldier i mixed in the higher echelons of the regiment i served. i have witnessed many things and i am still subject to the official secrets act, or i would happily tell you them. i also personally know the Grand Master Mason of Scotland , Archie Donald Orr Ewing (Sir) trust me when i say that you don't train for 4 years with the UK special forces (18 uk(sf) formally 264 sas signals ) with out learning how to root out secrets and covert information. when i say i have never seen it it is because it does not exist. i dont expect you to believe me "Even if you say you do, I won't believe you," its this level of closed mindedness and blinkered views that makes you seem like an idiot. i come on to forums like this because i find them funny.

keystone
05-09-2009, 11:01 PM
................cos if you were, you wouldn't come to this forum, would you? :DWhy not?

Cheers

nihil
06-09-2009, 02:16 AM
.
Link > Massonic newZ < linK (http://www.thespoof.com/)
.

always_rebel
10-09-2009, 01:59 AM
Why not?

Cheers

Cos you wouldn't have time for that being busy conspiring against the human race?


.

always_rebel
10-09-2009, 02:02 AM
i am a first generation mason from my immediate family and 5th generation in my family as a whole


So it can only mean one thing. You're a meaningless pawn. A cover. A useful idiot.

And you're poor. Even if you're a millionairre (which I doubt).

Cos for them the above are poverty stricken. The real ones are multibillionairres, whether you like it or not. Plus even if they wanted, there's not enough room for everyone up there on the pyramid.



.

keystone
10-09-2009, 08:38 AM
Cos you wouldn't have time for that being busy conspiring against the human race?


.Eh?

boots
10-09-2009, 10:03 AM
Eh?


Eh..... I think he is talking about the energy that the higher ups are giving to the human race. Most if not all masons of lower degrees dont understand that.


.

keystone
10-09-2009, 10:46 AM
Eh..... I think he is talking about the energy that the higher ups are giving to the human race.Do you think so? I'm not convinced. Sounds like another repeater but perhaps I'm being cynical. Post #17, however, reinforces that opinion. If I'm wrong I'll apologise.

Most if not all masons of lower degrees dont understand that.
A lot of people period don't understand the concept of energies.

Cheers

stewart edwards
10-09-2009, 11:05 AM
Eh..... I think he is talking about the energy that the higher ups are giving to the human race. Most if not all masons of lower degrees dont understand that.


.Boots out of curiosity have you noticed any change in the energy over the past four years or so?

always_rebel
10-09-2009, 04:57 PM
Eh?

oh yeah, Figure that.

go get a brain.

keystone
10-09-2009, 05:31 PM
oh yeah, Figure that.

go get a brain.Nope don't need to stretch mine one tiny iota in this particular case. :rolleyes:

Cheers

keystone
10-09-2009, 09:52 PM
.
Link > Massonic newZ < linK (http://www.thespoof.com/)
.Very droll.

Cheers