the worm that turned
31-08-2009, 09:22 PM
This is a work in progress so please bear with me and contribute freely:
It is clear that gaining an admission of the PERSON being used to create contracts in the commercial (admiralty) law based system of statutes that the Government, Judiciary and various other bodies are so keen to enforce on us is proving difficult. So how do we achieve proof once and for all?
THEORETICAL EXAMPLE:
If caught speeding or not paying a parking ticket etc then do not accept what is said and instead allow it to go to court. When summonsed to court you could request for a trial by jury (as is your Right of an English Man), or alternatively just go to the Magistrate's Court, as it will still be "On the Record".
Now create an affidavit attesting to the facts as YOU see them. You don't even need to mention the offense in question because what you put in YOUR affidavit is UP TO YOU.
What it is important to put in there is a statement of your understanding, in that the name MR JOE BLOGGS is not a living breathing man and is in fact a dead legal fiction that was created when you parents registered your birth (give details of birth). Also include details that the offense in question is in relation to MR JOE BLOGGS, however due to the inextricable link between the living breathing man, commonly called Joe of the family Bloggs, you feel that you must represent the dead legal fiction, MR JOE BLOGGS who this offense is in relation to. Also worth mentioning is that at all times you operate under the common law, as this is the only law that is applicable to a living breathing man, and at no time in the past, present or future do you wish to commit harm, loss or suffering to a fellow living breathing man or woman.
Now regardless of whether you win or lose the case in question (a small fine or points on your person's licence) the affidavit becomes binding in law unless rebutted. If it is rebutted then the rebuttal provided (I assume) will need to be a legal document (such as affidavit) that will become binding in law. Either way a definitive, precedent-setting, fact of law will be provided to prove the PERSON question once and for all.
One final point, it might be best to request a trial by jury to ensure that this is carried out under common law and with a judge (not a magistrate). The reason is due to the mortgage-related Credit River Case in the US, where the Grand Jury declared that the outcome of that case could not be used as precedent because it was a magistrate that determined the case, even thought there was a jury, and as far as I believe a judge involved too!!!
Just a thought - now rip it apart boys (and girls) :D
TWTT
It is clear that gaining an admission of the PERSON being used to create contracts in the commercial (admiralty) law based system of statutes that the Government, Judiciary and various other bodies are so keen to enforce on us is proving difficult. So how do we achieve proof once and for all?
THEORETICAL EXAMPLE:
If caught speeding or not paying a parking ticket etc then do not accept what is said and instead allow it to go to court. When summonsed to court you could request for a trial by jury (as is your Right of an English Man), or alternatively just go to the Magistrate's Court, as it will still be "On the Record".
Now create an affidavit attesting to the facts as YOU see them. You don't even need to mention the offense in question because what you put in YOUR affidavit is UP TO YOU.
What it is important to put in there is a statement of your understanding, in that the name MR JOE BLOGGS is not a living breathing man and is in fact a dead legal fiction that was created when you parents registered your birth (give details of birth). Also include details that the offense in question is in relation to MR JOE BLOGGS, however due to the inextricable link between the living breathing man, commonly called Joe of the family Bloggs, you feel that you must represent the dead legal fiction, MR JOE BLOGGS who this offense is in relation to. Also worth mentioning is that at all times you operate under the common law, as this is the only law that is applicable to a living breathing man, and at no time in the past, present or future do you wish to commit harm, loss or suffering to a fellow living breathing man or woman.
Now regardless of whether you win or lose the case in question (a small fine or points on your person's licence) the affidavit becomes binding in law unless rebutted. If it is rebutted then the rebuttal provided (I assume) will need to be a legal document (such as affidavit) that will become binding in law. Either way a definitive, precedent-setting, fact of law will be provided to prove the PERSON question once and for all.
One final point, it might be best to request a trial by jury to ensure that this is carried out under common law and with a judge (not a magistrate). The reason is due to the mortgage-related Credit River Case in the US, where the Grand Jury declared that the outcome of that case could not be used as precedent because it was a magistrate that determined the case, even thought there was a jury, and as far as I believe a judge involved too!!!
Just a thought - now rip it apart boys (and girls) :D
TWTT