View Full Version : Important history you should all know. Related to
questi
28-08-2009, 02:13 PM
*****MUST WATCH*****
Important history you should all know.
Related to the freeman of the land Admirality law and jurisdiction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4fWI1WMS4
killmicrosoft
28-08-2009, 02:15 PM
*****must watch*****
important history you should all know.
Related to the freeman of the land admirality law and jurisdiction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh4fwi1wms4
must watch ??????????????
rosix
28-08-2009, 02:21 PM
*****MUST WATCH*****
Important history you should all know.
Related to the freeman of the land Admirality law and jurisdiction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4fWI1WMS4
here u go
sometimes youtube doesn't show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh4fWI1WMS4
questi
28-08-2009, 02:31 PM
Whoops don't know what happened there.
Thanx rosix for helping me out. Peace.
angelthecat
28-08-2009, 03:18 PM
just emailed this link to all in my inbox it deserves to go viral ;)
angelthecat
28-08-2009, 03:23 PM
this could be where the story of the Resurrection and redemtion of the new testiment is trying to tell us.
questi
28-08-2009, 04:40 PM
Wow, angelthecat, you could be spot on there.
smoke n mirrors
28-08-2009, 05:23 PM
Any chance of a quick run down of the vital info, for those that cant watch the video and to help the site search function.
Thanks in advance. :)
.
girlgye
28-08-2009, 05:41 PM
It explains the Cest que Trust and the strawman illusion. Very British exposition :D
angelthecat
28-08-2009, 05:49 PM
im not the spelling police but I thought it might be easier for members to google
Cestui Qui Trust - The Strawman
sorry
questi
28-08-2009, 06:33 PM
Hope this works.
Found something here>> [URL="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/aep/1666/caep_16660011_en_1"]
Also http://www.acriticalstate.com/
Surely there has to be some form of redress here. It hasn't actually been hidden from us as such. The fact that we only have seven yrs to redeem ourselves back to life and claim for damages may be true, although it is fkg rediculous to expect a 7 yr old to have a clue even in this day and age, in view of the fact that even us adults never had a clue.
Of course we all know it is all planned that way as we are all begining to discover. If discovering the freeman issue and the BC issue wasn't mindboggling enough.
For those who cannot watch the video.
keep in mind the date 1666, the plague, great fire of london , great fire of Rome. So now we know there where great things happening. But there was one other great thing happening behind closed doors in parliment. An act was being debated=the Cestui Qui act.
which was to subricate men and women, meaning all men and women where declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea.
The state took everybody and there property into trust, the state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles and can also claim damages.
This is why you always need representation in all legal matters, because your dead.
Hope this has helped.
smoke n mirrors
28-08-2009, 08:11 PM
Thanks for the added info everyone. :)
.
burnttoast
28-08-2009, 10:12 PM
Hope this works.
Found something here>> [URL="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/aep/1666/caep_16660011_en_1"]
Also http://www.acriticalstate.com/
Surely there has to be some form of redress here. It hasn't actually been hidden from us as such. The fact that we only have seven yrs to redeem ourselves back to life and claim for damages may be true, although it is fkg rediculous to expect a 7 yr old to have a clue even in this day and age, in view of the fact that even us adults never had a clue.
Of course we all know it is all planned that way as we are all begining to discover. If discovering the freeman issue and the BC issue wasn't mindboggling enough.
For those who cannot watch the video.
keep in mind the date 1666, the plague, great fire of london , great fire of Rome. So now we know there where great things happening. But there was one other great thing happening behind closed doors in parliment. An act was being debated=the Cestui Qui act.
which was to subricate men and women, meaning all men and women where declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea.
The state took everybody and there property into trust, the state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles and can also claim damages.
This is why you always need representation in all legal matters, because your dead.
Hope this has helped.
Cestu Qui = Citizen of the democaracy evidenced by the SS#....HOWEVER...the (CITUS) trust associated with your Birth Certificate is FOREIGN from the democracy....and attached to the SS#.
The Living "MAN" (females included) is the only one that can claim anything...it operates both Trusts...and the ULTIMATE TRUST the Living Man falls under is that of the CREATOR (GOD)....always has....
We've always had the power....time to reclaim it.
Peace
pedsi
28-08-2009, 11:30 PM
Really interesting video.
Only the other day, a friend at work was telling me about a piece of council land he aquired next to his house by erecting a small fence,he reckoned because the council hadn't maintained the land or instructed him to reinstate the original boundry for SEVEN yrs he was able to claim the land as part of his property.
pedsi :)
questi
29-08-2009, 12:47 AM
I have just come home from a family nite out, I am obviously very keen on this subject.
burnttoast, pls explain what SS# is.
SH-T I will come back tmoz for the answer. tnx peace.
smoke n mirrors
29-08-2009, 12:52 AM
SS# = Social Security Number.
.
burnttoast
29-08-2009, 01:31 AM
SS# = Social Security Number.
.
And in Canada it's called your "Social Insurance Number" (SIN)...it would appear we're all SINners in the great white north...and I don't think it's a coincidence.;)
Peace
tien an
29-08-2009, 02:10 AM
Hi everyone,
sometimes my hair-splitting, über-critical attitude can pay dividends; I mean only to inform:
Cestui Qui Trust - The Strawman
From my knowledge of French and given that French was the language of the 'court' at the time, I'd say that Cestui Qui is, in fact: "C'est a qui? (Whose is it?).
Given the subject matter of the first two videos, I'd have a stab at saying that's the key to the matter: 'Whose is it?'.
Claim it.
No; I don't know how either, but I'm working on it.
(Interesting, don't you think, that at '26 minutes ago' according to Youtube Comments, you can read 'video three has been pulled' (paraphrased), from 'standingincommerce'),(at the time of writing this).
Another subject:
Are the NINO (National Insurance No, and 'SS' (Social Security) Number one and the same thing??
I'm referring to the UK.
C'est a qui?
C'est a moi!
Heavenly Peace,
tian an.
sindakit
29-08-2009, 02:23 AM
The videos really good. I think it explains things very well but now i'm getting very confused !?
My Confusion
1. Claiming to be a FMOTL takes yourself out of statute jurisdiction.. Got it
2. This Act that was passed, while London was burning, declared us dead and gave us 7 years to reclaim ourselves living.. Got it!
3. If I claim that I am alive and not as dead as the state suggests, amen't I placing myself under that Act?.. Don't got it!?
4. I'm older than 7!!! Now what!?.. Don't get it
My understanding
It seems that the only logical answer I can make is to claim FMOTL, therefore not under statute, thus I don't have to claim myself alive as that act doesn't concern me. Give me my stuff back!
But the Act does seem to throw a double bluff, and so people who realise the legal fiction of a 'person' then state a claim not realising they aren't claiming they are a freeman on the land but rather involuntarily agreeing that they are "alive" and thus fall into a trap of being caught under the jurisdiction of that Act. This situation would only have to last a decade or two (minimum 7 years) and by then all undeclared FMOTL are either "dead" or a "person" and Bc's are the norm.
Feel free to clarify my misconceptions!!!
tien an
29-08-2009, 02:50 AM
The videos really good. I think it explains things very well but now i'm getting very confused !?
My Confusion
1. Claiming to be a FMOTL takes yourself out of statute jurisdiction.. Got it
2. This Act that was passed, while London was burning, declared us dead and gave us 7 years to reclaim ourselves living.. Got it!
3. If I claim that I am alive and not as dead as the state suggests, amen't I placing myself under that Act?.. Don't got it!?
4. I'm older than 7!!! Now what!?.. Don't get it
My understanding
It seems that the only logical answer I can make is to claim FMOTL, therefore not under statute, thus I don't have to claim myself alive as that act doesn't concern me. Give me my stuff back!
But the Act does seem to throw a double bluff, and so people who realise the legal fiction of a 'person' then state a claim not realising they aren't claiming they are a freeman on the land but rather involuntarily agreeing that they are "alive" and thus fall into a trap of being caught under the jurisdiction of that Act. This situation would only have to last a decade or two (minimum 7 years) and by then all undeclared FMOTL are either "dead" or a "person" and Bc's are the norm.
Feel free to clarify my misconceptions!!!
C'est a qui?
Whose is it?
To whom does this dead body (corporate) belong?
'I claim the right to that body corporate, Sir.'
(And all who sail in her).
No mate; 'misconceptions' or 'mistakes' or 'errors' don't come into it...only 'ways not to do it'.
You think you're such a good shot that you're going to hit the bullseye every time?
You're generating discussion...
In My Humble Opinion:
If we're living in a 'parallel universe', commercially speaking, then shouldn't we claim the right to both the Self and the 'Entity' that they've created?
If there had been 'full disclosure' to me, at the age of seven, I may have understood.
Then again not...
In which case I'd argue that there seems to be 'mischief' within the contract...
Isn't it so (in the UK), that from the age of sixteen (UK), you have the right to enter into contract (pay rent/mortgage, utility bills), oh, and reproduce?
That would be more the age I'd say; I don't consider myself particularly bright, but at sixteen I'd definitely have understood this system...
Life would have been much different.
If we live in a parallel system, then there must be an opposite, (better) system...
I don't think their concept is, in itself bad:
If we take the value of the 'nation' as belonging to the nation, then your part of that value is considerable.
If you could offset your 'net worth' against decent shelter, food and clothing, (life's necessities), there'd be a lot less stress in the world.
If such a bond exists, then it generates dividends, then these dividends could be used, at your discretion, to provide a decent life for you and your family.
With control of these dividends, not only could you become incredibly prudent and responsible, you and your family could receive the education they deserve.
Part of the dividends should really be fed back into such a trust...to keep it ticking over.
It 'sounds like' black and white to me.
Which leads me on to... the replacement of the telly with a flat-screen, and then going all the way to 50" and other such extravagant desires would soon wear off...with the education, particularly in this subject....It would probably only take a generation or two for it to 'sink in' and become second-nature for a 7-yr-old.
C'est a qui?
C'est a moi!
tian an.
yozhik
29-08-2009, 03:11 AM
The significance of the 7 year term is it coincides with the Jewish custom of jubilee, when debts were forgiven.
Google "jubliee" for more specifics.
I think you'll also find statute of limitations, on some issues, is 7 years.
This term pops up quite often.
It's why the Golden Jubilee is such a huge occasion, because its the 7th cycle of the 7 years. So Queenie's Golden Jubilee is very much a celebration of the Jewish jubliee; not some local custom of an English monarch.
Every week (7 days) there is a Sabbath.
So every 7 years there is an annual Sabbath.
Every 50 years there is a Jubilee Sabbath.
Do some research :) ... its fascinating.
tien an
29-08-2009, 03:16 AM
I didn't know that, yozhik.
I admit I've got quite a way to go, but I'm getting there.
*goes to bed vowing to spend even more time looking things up.
tian an.
the worm that turned
29-08-2009, 08:32 AM
Forgive me for my cynicism or perhaps lack of comprehension but the first thing I did was look up the Act in question to determine what it meant.
I must admit that it didn't make a great deal of sense to me upon first reading, with a lot of olde english words.
IF and at the moment it's a big IF for me, it means what that random guy in a video on YouTube says it means then SURELY it cannot be fair, honest or open to expect a 7 year old to understand an Act from 1666 and the implication it can have on his/her life.
From what little I did understand from it, if a man/woman can come back from the dead (i.e. claim they are living) then all is forgiven.
An explanation in PLAIN ENGLISH is what is required and we need to start requesting that the meanings of ALL statutes be provided to those they impact upon.
I will be writing to my MP to ask for advice on how to request for the meanings to be given to me in Plain English, with the explanation that I cannot Stand Under something if I don't understand it!!
Perhaps their is a Government Official charged with the writing and explanation of these Acts, i.e. a legislature.
TWTT :confused:
yozhik
29-08-2009, 10:08 AM
Uh oh ... I can feel a Maxim [or two] coming on ... :rolleyes:
IF and at the moment it's a big IF for me, it means what that random guy in a video on YouTube says it means then SURELY it cannot be fair, honest or open to expect a 7 year old to understand an Act from 1666 and the implication it can have on his/her life.
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat.
Ignorance of fact may excuse, but not ignorance of law. 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3828.
Ignorantia facti excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat.
Ignorance of facts excuses, ignorance of law does not excuse. 1 Co. 177; 4 Bouv. Inst. n 3828.
From what little I did understand from it, if a man/woman can come back from the dead (i.e. claim they are living) then all is forgiven.
Nemo praesens nisi intelligat.
One is not present unless he understands.
Non in legendo sed in intelligendo leges consistunt.
The laws consist not in being read, but in being understood. 8 co. 167.
Also relevant and needing consideration is the Doctrine of parens patriae.
[Latin, Parent of the country.] A doctrine that grants the inherent power and authority of the state to protect persons who are legally unable to act on their own behalf.
The parens patriae doctrine has its roots in English COMMON LAW. In feudal times various obligations and powers, collectively referred to as the "royal prerogative," were reserved to the king. The king exercised these functions in his role of father of the country.
The state, acting as parens patriae, can make decisions regarding mental health treatment on behalf of one who is mentally incompetent to make the decision on his or her own behalf [...]
smoke n mirrors
29-08-2009, 10:32 AM
The use of ignorance to create laws and administer them, is just a means to justify the corruption and further the deception.
.
angelthecat
29-08-2009, 01:59 PM
It has dawned on my that the resurrection of jesus was witnessed by, I think and have not checked yet, please correct me if I am wrong. Three people and not the masses, this to me sounds like an AFFIDAVIT, and as the creator of government they cannot force us to accept their Admirality law and jurisdiction. as the created can not make rules for the creator.Cestui Qui act is an ACT. Maxim a pact made with evil intent will not be upheld.(Dolo malo pactum se non servabit)
thinking again it would need three independant affidavit's to verify that you are alive
:rolleyes:
the worm that turned
29-08-2009, 04:13 PM
All the more reason for me to receive clarification of the meanings of these Acts, therefore I cannot be ignorant of the "law".
Watching the BBC series the Tudors I can see that we (plebs, great unwashed, funders of the rich) haven't really progressed over 400 years, it is now just done via subversion.
Oh how things WILL change very soon :D
pedsi
29-08-2009, 05:27 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
questi
29-08-2009, 10:27 PM
Thanks to you all for the various pieces of info adding to my dot to dot picture that I am currently trying to complete.
Gone off on a bit of a tangent Re- the resurection and redemtion concept.
Loved the monty python vid.
Hope there will be some success in being able to watch the rest of this series of video's.
Off to do a little more digging. Ill'e be back. Peace.
kisatu
29-08-2009, 11:25 PM
From A dictionary of modern legal usage By Bryan A. Garner
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=35dZpfMmxqsC&lpg=PA144&ots=k8tVVFsfI7&dq=Cestui%20Qui%20Trust&pg=PA144#v=onepage&q=Cestui%20Qui%20Trust&f=true
Not sure if that helps.
yozhik
29-08-2009, 11:27 PM
From A dictionary of modern legal usage By Bryan A. Garner
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=35dZpfMmxqsC&lpg=PA144&ots=k8tVVFsfI7&dq=Cestui%20Qui%20Trust&pg=PA144#v=onepage&q=Cestui%20Qui%20Trust&f=true
Not sure if that helps.
link not working for me :(
kisatu
29-08-2009, 11:32 PM
link not working for me :(
Grr.
Now? (http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=35dZpfMmxqsC&lpg=PA144&ots=k8tVVFsfI7&dq=Cestui%20Qui%20Trust&pg=PA144#v=onepage&q=Cestui%20Qui%20Trust&f=true")
flyermay
29-08-2009, 11:48 PM
Not sure if someone posted this before, but I heard something similar from Jordan Maxwell time ago.
Skip to minute 5:47 on this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ovyn6GiBU5c
questi
30-08-2009, 03:00 PM
The 3rd and 4th video is up.
under the title Manchester Arsenal 2009
AND m & j.
Ludicrous that they are having to use title coverups to get this stuff out.
For those who can download vids to pc who have got space, download before they are taken down/sencered.
My bad spelling, sorry in a hurry. I will be back.
vienna
31-08-2009, 09:09 AM
great vid thanks for posting - I'm very intrigued about hidden history from 1600 onwards
vienna
31-08-2009, 09:12 AM
The significance of the 7 year term is it coincides with the Jewish custom of jubilee, when debts were forgiven.
Google "jubliee" for more specifics.
I think you'll also find statute of limitations, on some issues, is 7 years.
This term pops up quite often.
It's why the Golden Jubilee is such a huge occasion, because its the 7th cycle of the 7 years. So Queenie's Golden Jubilee is very much a celebration of the Jewish jubliee; not some local custom of an English monarch.
Every week (7 days) there is a Sabbath.
So every 7 years there is an annual Sabbath.
Every 50 years there is a Jubilee Sabbath.
Do some research :) ... its fascinating.
fascinating stuff its also interesting that science says the body completey renews itself at the celluar level every 7 years too
you get the feeling we're living in a fishtank created and managed from the outside by goups far more knowledgeable than current thinking
boots
02-07-2010, 10:47 AM
http://www.socaltrailriders.org/gallery/data/500/Bump1.jpg
:D
:o Sorry girls. It's a man thing.
Seriously this is good info and the vid at the start of this thread explains the start of the legal "act" to control us all.
.