Project Camelot And The US Army

[hank_scorpio]

http://www.rense.com/general87/camelot.htm

[xpleet]

And Alex Jones working for the Zionists right? haha lol

Mr. Rense and his website - good at the art of slander for sure.

[phemohilia]

I don't trust that "Project Camelot" team, they've only interviewed a very small handful of people that I'd even give the time of day, and even they are questionable!!! Thanks for the article....

[hank_scorpio]

I've watched alot of project camelot videos I do think a lot of its dis info but Gark Mckinnon seems to be telling the truth so there could be some truth in project camelot but I have no way to verify any of it. Are the military more interested in our reactions to the information.

[lase]

I don't trust that "Project Camelot" team, they've only interviewed a very small handful of people that I'd even give the time of day, and even they are questionable!!! Thanks for the article....

Agree absolutely!

Normally I avoid PC threads.

http://passage11.com/img/Kerry.jpg

To me it's like this blatent cash-in.

I've seen interviews where you can see on the interviewee's face that they're lying.

And whats behind the logo?

http://manuel.sekmeth.com/hb7/assets/camelot_cheetah_logo.jpg

Hunter?

Pick off the weak?

Meat eater?

Better sight than you?

[amabus]

Quotes are from the article:

"Among the key giveaways of such operations and operators is their 'overnight' sudden appearance (as opposed to gradually materializing?) and full-blown 'presence' (ah, half-assed is better). "

"First, the slick, well-funded website appears" (which Project Camelot's is not) "followed by the inevitable internet radio 'truth' program" (false programs rarely do well)"...of which there are countless hundreds now" (and that's a bad thing?). "Sometimes 'conferences' and seminars are organized usually staffed with the same old familiar information (and disinformation) merchants". (covered all your bases, you did)

"There are different tactics for quickly establishing a 'name' in such operations. The easiest technique is to spew out a string of relatively solid and sometimes new information to draw interest, establish some 'buzz' and credibility." (oh, so old, questionable information is the way to go)

I could go on but you get my drift. He's really good at playing "attack some of the established names in the alternative field, accusing them of being 'agents provocateurs', and baiting them into defending themselves, thereby wasting their time and energy."

And mine. :o

[ozpixie]

I have watched a lot of their interviews mainly out of curiosity. There are simply too many variables between the stories, especially any that relate to UFO activity, or military issues and they cannot all be right. I am sitting on the fence and will keep watching their interviews and wait for the truth to emerge.

[pinkgeranium]

I dont know what to make of Project Camelot.

They are so BAD at what they do, I cant work out if they
are very clever stooges or just very bad and naive interviewers trying to
get the truth out.


I listened to one of their radio shows, where Kerry was defending
her interviewing style re Steven Greer (Very Strange Bloke IMHO).

Kerry accually believes that she is cutting edge and no nonsence.........
as oppose to being down right anoying, forever butting in and talking over people.


Some of their guests are so unbeleivable, Maybe truth is stranger than fiction.

Still, theres money to made and egos to be maintained in the "Truth" industry.
Just like every other aspect of life. So It would not surprise me atall if many
people are not what they seem.

[danster82]

And Alex Jones working for the Zionists right? haha lol

Mr. Rense and his website - good at the art of slander for sure.

no this isnt what rense is doing, what rense does is consciously always puts up opposing news, as in truly unbiased if you look you will see contradicting news on Rense and its MENT to be that way thats what news is.

[farros]

I think some of you are giving PC a tough rap..

they never went out as experienced journalists at all, just 2 people who thought interviewing so called whistleblowers would be interesting to add to the library of alternative media.

Kerry is a good interviewer imo, she's just as curious as we are and asks questions on behalf of herself, not just who may be viewing. Stephen Greer was a bit of a pleb imo.

The thing is, a lot of there 'evidence' comes from Dan Burisch who imo is a total wacko. In a lot of there interviews you hear Kerry say to the interviewee "according to Burisch" well that has no credibility at all, yet she refers to him as one of the top sources of inside info.

[blueyonder2012]

The thing is, a lot of there 'evidence' comes from Dan Burisch who imo is a total wacko. In a lot of there interviews you hear Kerry say to the interviewee "according to Burisch" well that has no credibility at all, yet she refers to him as one of the top sources of inside info.

Dan Burisch still believes 9/11 was done by 19 terrorists with box cutters (Stans knives).

I thought "EH", and they seem to totally hang on his words?:confused::confused:

They are still doing a very good job getting stuff out there to fit into the big game.

Take what you want and leave the rest as they say too.

.

[tyler]

The fact that the English fellow never takes off his hat strikes me as odd and very bad mannered. Where did he come from anyway? What's his background?

[beldazar]

http://www.rense.com/general87/camelot.htm

:cool:

[beldazar]

The fact that the English fellow never takes off his hat strikes me as odd and very bad mannered. Where did he come from anyway? What's his background?

Yes and he has a very good grasp of the 'Queen's English'..............;)

[spiraltrance]

I've said several times before on this site that Project Camelot are disinfo. I wouldn't trust them as far as I can thrown them. They sometimes get genuine speakers on but then subtely twist what they say by adding there own distorted comments. The last David Icke interview on Project Camelot was a perfect example.

[jammasterj13]

I know I've got a shitload of house bricks with Kerry Cassidys name on em.

So annoying and pretentious.

[devanshoom]

kerry cassidy's face has an honest and genuine sort of air about it....thats about all I know. She's still quite hot for a mature woman.

[clozaril]

in the DI interview she was trying to speak over him and needing to get her point of view across. the few interviews i've seen it's like she's wanting to score points 'we've been told this' 'our informant told us that'

[disorder2k8]

in the DI interview she was trying to speak over him and needing to get her point of view across. the few interviews i've seen it's like she's wanting to score points 'we've been told this' 'our informant told us that'

That happens all the time!

They have this annoying habit of not waiting until the end to field the questions they want to ask.

[mr i02]

but if you think about it this whole mess could be dis info.

This is perfect for them disinfo everywhere this will confuse minds like it did me.

[spiraltrance]

The main give away sign the project camelot is disinfo is that i've never watched one of there videos and came from it feeling more aware or positive.

They're always promoting an impending sense of doom and then giving contradictary steps on how to solve the problems they highlight. And they're very good at making sure people remain in a state of fragmentation, confusion and fear, the very mindests that keep the NWO going.

[radford]

Project Camelot will "uncover" something very important in the years to come.

They are coming in for alot of hassle at the moment as they are about to hold their first ever conference.

When someone gets close to the truth then the "other side" ramp up their attacks.

There site is a no frills site containing just interviews. They have given a platform for many tens of people in the "truth" and "conspiracy" movement and "whistleblowers" as well.

That is all they do - they give a platform for other people.

By doing this they do us all a service.

For instance Miriam Delcado is a very compelling "witness" to many things. Her interview alone is very unique.

Nearly 10 million people have visited their site.

What disinfo are they giving out by allowing other people to have a voice ?

I laugh at the disinfo and schill arguments with seem to come from paranoid people within any discussion. I have seen so many silly threads about people - some I have met - that these sorts of things need to be looked at in this way.

Who benefits if Project Camelot is damaged ? The elite because they close down an investigative project.

Finally - all of us have the capability to check any information against our BS filter. Therefore we will filter out disinfo and commercial aspects from ideas as a matter of course.

I visit PC every day - it is an interesting source of information and I am sure it will one day uncover something of great importance.

[farros]

Project Camelot will "uncover" something very important in the years to come.

They are coming in for alot of hassle at the moment as they are about to hold their first ever conference.

When someone gets close to the truth then the "other side" ramp up their attacks.

There site is a no frills site containing just interviews. They have given a platform for many tens of people in the "truth" and "conspiracy" movement and "whistleblowers" as well.

That is all they do - they give a platform for other people.

By doing this they do us all a service.

For instance Miriam Delcado is a very compelling "witness" to many things. Her interview alone is very unique.

Nearly 10 million people have visited their site.

What disinfo are they giving out by allowing other people to have a voice ?

I laugh at the disinfo and schill arguments with seem to come from paranoid people within any discussion. I have seen so many silly threads about people - some I have met - that these sorts of things need to be looked at in this way.

Who benefits if Project Camelot is damaged ? The elite because they close down an investigative project.

Finally - all of us have the capability to check any information against our BS filter. Therefore we will filter out disinfo and commercial aspects from ideas as a matter of course.

I visit PC every day - it is an interesting source of information and I am sure it will one day uncover something of great importance.


Well said!

Project camelot are simply a platform, it is the interviewees which determine who/what is credible. David Wilcock is a great speaker I found out about through PC.

[chipstyxx]

I don't think Project Camelot are clever enough to be disinfo, not entirely by themselves anyway. I think they come across as hugely egotistical and this with their determination to constantly prove they're the only ones who know 'the truth', taints every so called 'interview' they do. Kerry Cassidy is a terrible interviewer and communicator in general. She never actually listens to her guests. I think she revels in the air of authority and status that her role as interviewer/heckler gives her. Have you tried reading the Project Camelot website? It's full of sentences that go on for pages, punctuated only with misplaced hyphens and commas for dramatic effect. What I am trying to point out is how ideal someone like this is to manipulate for disinfo purposes. Just take a huge ego needing to be stroked, mix it with an inability to listen or communicate with others and voila - you get a whole load of confusing crap.

Some one mentioned the Project Camelot logo, it's a Cheetah! Play on words?

[disorder2k8]

if anyone was wondering about their funding, I think it was personal or donation based as they are asking for more donations now (they seem to have run dry apparently)

[ustane]

The cheetah is a play on words... and in their films I've seen in a small picture box of two feline carved statues that look like cheetahs or lions with a gargoyle appearance

[subl1minal]

That happens all the time!

They have this annoying habit of not waiting until the end to field the questions they want to ask.

Yeah and almost ALWAYS the person being interviewed is literally about to get into the key point they're trying to make. Just like with Icke's interview and he's like ''Well this is what I was just about to get into..'' haha!

Like I've said before, I don't think PC are bad, it's the people they interview, I think out of the lot, Icke, Mckinnon (who clearly saw something he shouldn't) and Jim Marrs have been the best and clearly the most concise/truthful of the rest.