Decoded:->"The One" being used to reduce the Many?

[raptorialis]

The recent release of the Mass Murder Libyian Terrorist for the Lockerbie Bombing has got me trying to decode the decision.

I believe that this is the answer:-

It says... the "One" is more important than the "Many". = The Bomber (the One) is more important than (the many) the victims and their families.

By this decision, they are setting a precedent which says....

The "One" can be more important than the "Many".

This is consistent global political perspective which expects to reduce the worlds population down to 1 Billion within the 21st Century.

This is a covert message which basically says. We are not to blame for the Many. We had to do it, in order to save the "One" - "To Save The Few".

They are softening you up, so you will accept the cull when it starts to happen!

Its...The One Show!
http://node2.bbcimg.co.uk/iplayer/images/episode/b00lzdlg_640_360.jpg

[fallensoul]

Well this says nothing at all. Define what the one stands for and what the many stand for? Then we can have a debate. And also how do you know what the many stand for since they are the many with scattered views. And if you do know what the one stands for then prove it.

[raptorialis]

"The One", as in "One in awareness of itself".
"The indivisible one"
"The infinite one"
"The sacred "I"
The source of Selfless love

The compassion shown to one person (the bomber) was at the disproportionate cost of compassion for the many (the victims and their families).

My point is that my own analysis revealed to me that they are using the sacred faculity of "The One", to justify their own actions of bringing the justice system into disrepute and in effect attempting to alter the publics perspective; from many peoples lives can be of more of value than one persons life to many peoples lives are of less value than one persons life.

Hence they are setting a precedent which hides a covert message.......

...The "One" is more important than the "Many".

This serves the agenda to depopulate. To reduce the many down to the One.. Or the many to the important few.





Well this says nothing at all. Define what the one stands for and what the many stand for? Then we can have a debate. And also how do you know what the many stand for since they are the many with scattered views. And if you do know what the one stands for then prove it.

[fallensoul]

Okay thanks for explaining it. Makes sense. But it is not so black and white.

[marpat]

"The One", as in "One in awareness of itself".
"The indivisible one"
"The infinite one"
"The sacred "I"
The source of Selfless love

The compassion shown to one person (the bomber) was at the disproportionate cost of compassion for the many (the victims and their families).

My point is that my own analysis revealed to me that they are using the sacred faculity of "The One", to justify their own actions of bringing the justice system into disrepute and in effect attempting to alter the publics perspective; from many peoples lives can be of more of value than one persons life to many peoples lives are of less value than one persons life.

Hence they are setting a precedent which hides a covert message.......

...The "One" is more important than the "Many".

This serves the agenda to depopulate. To reduce the many down to the One.. Or the many to the important few.

Thats what you want it to mean. I think you are stretching your imagination too far.

Actually labels such as 'one' and 'many' are just part of the dualistic mind and meaningless without reference to the other.

[raptorialis]

Yes, i do understand your point marpat.

I too see the methods and interplay of duality.

But others do not and this kind of juxtor-positioning with the criminal justice system is a sign of the worst kind of criminal intent.

These are deceitful signs of demons addressing and re-programming human subconsciousness.


Thats what you want it to mean. I think you are stretching your imagination too far.

Actually labels such as 'one' and 'many' are just part of the dualistic mind and meaningless without reference to the other.

[leviathanstaar]

'Actually labels such as 'one' and 'many' are just part of the dualistic mind and meaningless without reference to the other'.


And? Most thing are meaningless without their perceived opposite.

What does that have to do with his theory?

Perhaps he is using his imagination to much, but that was no argument against it. That was stating an obvious, unrelated fact imo.

[raptorialis]

yes, it is never black and white. But i am beginning to see signs in "governing positions" which have altered established codes of justice that have stood for many decades.

Hence i am identifying these, then evaluating them and attempting to interpret the intentions behind them.


Okay thanks for explaining it. Makes sense. But it is not so black and white.

[dolores1]

The one is the most important. We are all the ONE, there is nothing else.

Also in my mind this man was a patsy.

[themime]

Hmmm "The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.", that is.....illogical.

[raptorialis]

What is illogical about that?

So you think the needs of One man who was a bomber, outweighs the needs of the victims and their families?

How can that be in anyway wrong or illogical?

Unless you are a member of the bourgeosie of course.

Hmmm "The needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.", that is.....illogical.

[enga]

No he was freed because Nat Rothschild is a friend of Gadaffis son and Gadaffi has been wanting the guy free forever and in turn Mandelson has been hanging out with Nat and his friends. To be honest I do not know whether the guy actually committed the acts he is accused of but I certainly empathise with the poor families. Now Gadaffi got what he wants he stuck two fingers up at Britain.

[raptorialis]

yes, i am watching the patterns of justice, or in this case. Injustice.

No he was freed because Nat Rothschild is a friend of Gadaffis son and Gadaffi has been wanting the guy free forever and in turn Mandelson has been hanging out with Nat and his friends. To be honest I do not know whether the guy actually committed the acts he is accused of but I certainly empathise with the poor families. Now Gadaffi got what he wants he stuck two fingers up at Britain.