cpfc12
16-08-2009, 04:27 PM
Does it really matter what papers you read, i mean they all distort people from the truth, you have to read between the lines, and they just make people confused, angry, even those that are apparently "awake" eventhough im sure people who are truly "awake" don't read the news, as they realise its all bullshit.
Okay daily i read the daily mail, the guardian, evening standard, local paper whatever that maybe, so yes i am fascinated espescially the comments written on their websites, but also whats going on in a local level, ive got a nack for sociology and it does interest me still. However its amazing how people base their beliefs, like political views on papers, the daily mail for example has outdone the guardian in terms of giving coverage to gary mckinnion and i.d cards, also 7/7... the guardian tend to cover the liberal versions of stories, which i guess is good, and provides pressure, but they tend to slam the police constantly, (well most mainstream papers do) as its in the ptb interests to alienate the police from the public, and make people forget that the are infact humans as well, because hell, that is rather clever, as people think they are getting a liberal version of events but in fact its just part of the powers at be, way of dividing and ruling".
If you need further evidence of this, then ask yourself why would the papers (all are responsible) espescially the guardian, along with all forms of mass media, are so focused on portraying the police as corrupt pigs, and tarring them with all the same brush, yes i think its important to focus on corruption as they are in a positon of power, but then again its a police force of human beings not robots, you are going to get "bad apples" so to speak. Those people who choose to believe the media can aruge that, they are simply trying to sensatinalise a topic, which feeds the publics fear, come on a story on the public protecters being corrupt etc, will boost fear and anger to such a high level. Those sucking on such energy, will orgasm.
I say this as i know of times, from police personally, in which they have been slammed rather unfairly by the media, and small stories such as a police van parking on a double yellow line, taking in mind this was on the manchester gazette. There are coutless examples, but all you gotta do is look unbiasly (if thats a word) and see there is a deliberate witch hunt going on. Something like this isn't accidental, pluarlists would say, that it is feeding the demmand of the public, and nothing more, no political reason for pushing a story or stories in this case. However if thats the case, then wouldn't they be daily writing stories with sensationalist headlines about cooperations, organisations that are commiting all sorts of evil acts across the words, armies, our own politicians ?? the list is endless. No because it wouldn't fit their purpose. Marxist sociologists, would say the media is used to enforce the dominant idology, if you modify this only slightly (taking in mind this is what is being taught in my sixth form currently) then you can see that it all trickles down, journalists aren't solely responsible for enforcing this ideology, of hate, divide and rule, they are being manipulated, pressured, just like the police, you and me, freemasons to an extent on the lower level. But it comes from the editors, above etc, what stories they want to publish.
Another purpose of the slamming of police, is to make the police more desensitised to ciriticism, there is alot of mixed messages going on, be directed to them, when this happens, you go beyond confusion, and just blindly follow orders. Which as history as told us, can be extremely dangerous in the future.
So now we realise no paper really is telling the truth, just a distorted version, to fit an agenda, which is in different coloured packaging, like you buying coca pops in a shreddies box. imm not going to blame journalists as the reasons i have explained above. i am sure some would love to display the truth, and are often bullshited by high ranking officials along with people in their own company.
All different forms of mass media, are set to confuse people, (obviously) even people who appear " to be awake" (coining some phrase which is now more than ever seem to be used to boost peoples egos) probably has the same affect, of shocking the mouse as david icke said. The stories given will support peoples hate for whoever they may be, the daily mail will push people to hate immigrants, people on benefits, the sun would push people to hate musilims, and then on the mix stories are thrown into tame down and contradict these views, to make people feel that papers are acting unbiasly*.
All i can say (advice which i find hard to follow but helps) is to read the papers all you want, and watch the news channels, but if you are getting angry or pissed off realise, that you have to control your mind, your mind is being controlled by the powers at be, this goes for all of those who get pissed off at the media becasue you believe that they aren't telling the truth, remember your or my version of the truth could be wrong as well, and if you are getting angry because of that, you have little control over your mind.
The anger felt when we understand hidden agendas, and lies being fed to us, is the same anger being felt when someone reads the daily mail and curses immigrants. No difference, same feeling, same emotion, same thing which leads to persecution and god knows what.
Its easier said than done i know, when i watched that bbc documentary on the 7/7 bombings, i wanted to get a semi automatic and climb a clocktower, but what would that truly achieve.
peace
p.s i just used a few examples in this rant, as im sure you can think of many more which affect you personally, any revolution that takes place, has to be a peaceful otherwise it will have no true affect, things will just be the same, perhaps worse, look at the russian revolution, and the rise of Stalin, it will be the same just a different person. :)
Okay daily i read the daily mail, the guardian, evening standard, local paper whatever that maybe, so yes i am fascinated espescially the comments written on their websites, but also whats going on in a local level, ive got a nack for sociology and it does interest me still. However its amazing how people base their beliefs, like political views on papers, the daily mail for example has outdone the guardian in terms of giving coverage to gary mckinnion and i.d cards, also 7/7... the guardian tend to cover the liberal versions of stories, which i guess is good, and provides pressure, but they tend to slam the police constantly, (well most mainstream papers do) as its in the ptb interests to alienate the police from the public, and make people forget that the are infact humans as well, because hell, that is rather clever, as people think they are getting a liberal version of events but in fact its just part of the powers at be, way of dividing and ruling".
If you need further evidence of this, then ask yourself why would the papers (all are responsible) espescially the guardian, along with all forms of mass media, are so focused on portraying the police as corrupt pigs, and tarring them with all the same brush, yes i think its important to focus on corruption as they are in a positon of power, but then again its a police force of human beings not robots, you are going to get "bad apples" so to speak. Those people who choose to believe the media can aruge that, they are simply trying to sensatinalise a topic, which feeds the publics fear, come on a story on the public protecters being corrupt etc, will boost fear and anger to such a high level. Those sucking on such energy, will orgasm.
I say this as i know of times, from police personally, in which they have been slammed rather unfairly by the media, and small stories such as a police van parking on a double yellow line, taking in mind this was on the manchester gazette. There are coutless examples, but all you gotta do is look unbiasly (if thats a word) and see there is a deliberate witch hunt going on. Something like this isn't accidental, pluarlists would say, that it is feeding the demmand of the public, and nothing more, no political reason for pushing a story or stories in this case. However if thats the case, then wouldn't they be daily writing stories with sensationalist headlines about cooperations, organisations that are commiting all sorts of evil acts across the words, armies, our own politicians ?? the list is endless. No because it wouldn't fit their purpose. Marxist sociologists, would say the media is used to enforce the dominant idology, if you modify this only slightly (taking in mind this is what is being taught in my sixth form currently) then you can see that it all trickles down, journalists aren't solely responsible for enforcing this ideology, of hate, divide and rule, they are being manipulated, pressured, just like the police, you and me, freemasons to an extent on the lower level. But it comes from the editors, above etc, what stories they want to publish.
Another purpose of the slamming of police, is to make the police more desensitised to ciriticism, there is alot of mixed messages going on, be directed to them, when this happens, you go beyond confusion, and just blindly follow orders. Which as history as told us, can be extremely dangerous in the future.
So now we realise no paper really is telling the truth, just a distorted version, to fit an agenda, which is in different coloured packaging, like you buying coca pops in a shreddies box. imm not going to blame journalists as the reasons i have explained above. i am sure some would love to display the truth, and are often bullshited by high ranking officials along with people in their own company.
All different forms of mass media, are set to confuse people, (obviously) even people who appear " to be awake" (coining some phrase which is now more than ever seem to be used to boost peoples egos) probably has the same affect, of shocking the mouse as david icke said. The stories given will support peoples hate for whoever they may be, the daily mail will push people to hate immigrants, people on benefits, the sun would push people to hate musilims, and then on the mix stories are thrown into tame down and contradict these views, to make people feel that papers are acting unbiasly*.
All i can say (advice which i find hard to follow but helps) is to read the papers all you want, and watch the news channels, but if you are getting angry or pissed off realise, that you have to control your mind, your mind is being controlled by the powers at be, this goes for all of those who get pissed off at the media becasue you believe that they aren't telling the truth, remember your or my version of the truth could be wrong as well, and if you are getting angry because of that, you have little control over your mind.
The anger felt when we understand hidden agendas, and lies being fed to us, is the same anger being felt when someone reads the daily mail and curses immigrants. No difference, same feeling, same emotion, same thing which leads to persecution and god knows what.
Its easier said than done i know, when i watched that bbc documentary on the 7/7 bombings, i wanted to get a semi automatic and climb a clocktower, but what would that truly achieve.
peace
p.s i just used a few examples in this rant, as im sure you can think of many more which affect you personally, any revolution that takes place, has to be a peaceful otherwise it will have no true affect, things will just be the same, perhaps worse, look at the russian revolution, and the rise of Stalin, it will be the same just a different person. :)