View Full Version : Pension Propaganda - because we live longer
bobbydiva
08-08-2009, 01:16 PM
I had to laugh. I'm just watching the BBC and they claim, because life expectancy is going up, so will the pension age.
I'm pretty sure there is another reason why we won't get our pensions. ;)
mikey mikey
08-08-2009, 01:25 PM
:mad:I had to laugh. I'm just watching the BBC and they claim, because life expectancy is going up, so will the pension age.
I'm pretty sure there is another reason why we won't get our pensions. ;)
What a nuisance eh? Living.
Bastadz
decim
08-08-2009, 02:52 PM
Thomas Telford (1757–1834)
Sir Barnes Wallis (1887–1978)
John Webster (1845–1914)
Sir Joseph Whitworth (1803–1887)
LIES.
bobbydiva
08-08-2009, 08:05 PM
To be honest though I never even factor in a state pension, to me it already doesn't exist.
margaretr
08-08-2009, 08:25 PM
I am 66. Every week in my local press there are obituaries for people dying between 55 and 70. These 'young' deaths have noticeably been on the increase for the past year.
Most people in my age group are taking several pharma meds daily.
I was very ill a year ago but am recovering by using food supplements, and have binned all pharma meds (which had made me ill).
My contemporaries think that 'doctor knows best' and are letting themselves be poisoned slowly.
I suppose that is why the over 65s are at the back of the queue for the flu vaccines. They don't need to kill them off that way - most won't reach age 70 due to the medication they are taking.
Codex Alimentarius will be severely restricting the availability of the natural medicines which are curing me. I have managed to stockpile a few years supply.
Please consider signing my petition to #10
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
The postponement of retirement pension age to 70 will guarantee that few people will be around to draw it.
bobbydiva
08-08-2009, 11:21 PM
Signed :)
Hospitals is another thing. My Nan recently went in and they didn't diagnose her, just medded her up with random things. There was a orange on the floor beside the bed for a week (we left it to see how long it would take them), and they basically would have ignored her if we didn't force them to actually see to her.
I think once you get old they just let you die slowly in hospital. There isn't even any dignity.
beldazar
09-08-2009, 12:14 AM
I am 66. Every week in my local press there are obituaries for people dying between 55 and 70. These 'young' deaths have noticeably been on the increase for the past year.
Most people in my age group are taking several pharma meds daily.
I was very ill a year ago but am recovering by using food supplements, and have binned all pharma meds (which had made me ill).
My contemporaries think that 'doctor knows best' and are letting themselves be poisoned slowly.
I suppose that is why the over 65s are at the back of the queue for the flu vaccines. They don't need to kill them off that way - most won't reach age 70 due to the medication they are taking.
Codex Alimentarius will be severely restricting the availability of the natural medicines which are curing me. I have managed to stockpile a few years supply.
Please consider signing my petition to #10
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Vitamins/
The postponement of retirement pension age to 70 will guarantee that few people will be around to draw it.
Good post Margaretr.
herzmeister
09-08-2009, 12:26 AM
Well, people having to work longer means more jobless people :o ...
We need to wake up, the whole economic system is all BS. We need to understand what money really is.
With today's means of production we live already in total abundance. We are already free and don't realize it. Let's just look around, one farmer can feed dozends of people. And the potential of automations isn't even tapped remotely yet because they say it would even cause more jobless people.
But that's obviously such a big deception. Machines and software that do all the tedious and repetitive work for us obviously don't lower the gross domestic product of goods, instead they rather raise it. They should make us have to work less and less and we should have more time to spend on more creative things.
But instead of distributing this generated higher standard of wealth to all of us, they say there are no financial resources left, we are being fired and told we are not needed anymore. The industries are forced to builds things like mobile phones in a way that they stop working after two years just to keep things going for them.
The pressure that is built on our lives is totally artificial to keep us down and in control. They need "poverty" and a lower class dependent on the system in order to be able to recruit them and send them to Iraq and Afghanistan.
If the wealth in the western world was distributed equally, everyone could easily just get about 3000 € basic income for doing nothing. (S)He could then decide if that is fine for him/her and play WOW all day and night long, or if (s)he wants to study, earn even more by working if (s)he wants some luxury, or self-actualise him/her in another way.
Money is the blood of the living organism called society. In our bodies, cells don't have to beg for the blood, it's just distributed to them. Most are even just literally swimming in it. And the cells use it just by doing what they always do, just by living, just by existing, just by expressing themselves. We spend money, so it's always in circulation. It belongs to no one, it's always there, it's circulating. What we see today is a dying organism because the blood has clumped together on some remote places building cancerous structures.
%%%
motleyhoo
09-08-2009, 03:53 AM
Good post herzmeister. It's the gospel truth.
But pensions are reverse ponzi schemes and never were sustainable. You cannot run a company if you have to pay out to twice as many retired people as the number of people who are actually working for you right now. That just doesn't add up and it never did.
Our entire financial system has been broken for decades because of greed, and it always will be.
.