PDA

View Full Version : Debt Slavery: A Short History of Banking


joyful
07-08-2009, 08:58 AM
Debt Slavery: A Short History of Banking


Surely the Government is in control of the country and its supply of money? Surely money is only a symbolic token to facilitate the production, exchange and distribution of goods and services? Not so, say the Third Positionists, who reject both Capitalism and Communism...

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/355/debt.gif


THE BEGINNING OF IT ALL

http://www.historyforkids.org/learn/religion/jews/pictures/medieval.jpg

In the old days there was no paper money. The accepted token of exchange was precious metal minted into coins by the Church and the Crown. Because there was only a limited amount of gold and silver available, the economic life of the nation had a certain regularity.

An even greater restriction existed throughout Christendom. This was a prohibition against usury, or charging interest. The Church held it to be a grave sin and the code was upheld by the civil powers. There were harsh penalties for those who broke the law.

The regulation of usury was to prevent the separation of money from reality. Money is not a good, it is a measure. It is fraud to pretend otherwise, and constitutes theft. Usury is making money from lending money; it is making money from nothing. This is exactly what is happening today on a colossal scale.

Several important things arose from the prohibition of usury in medieval Christendom. Firstly Jews, who had taken to wandering around Europe in the Middle Ages, began to specialize in money-lending and other practices which were forbidden to Christians. Exploited Christians, both peasants and aristocracy, found themselves being bled dry by usurers, which is why there were sporadic uprisings, imprisonments and expulsions of Jews throughout Europe. It is one reason why King Edward I expelled them from England in 1290. Oliver Cromwell allowed them back when the moral authority of the Church was undermined and the King was beheaded in 1649.

Secondly, gold coins, jewels and other valuables were deposited with people who held strongboxes. This was usually with goldsmiths and money-lenders who, more often than not, were one and the same. These loan-sharks and scriveners realized that, without much chance of being found out, they could charge people for looking after their deposits and then use those deposits – which did not belong to them – to make loans to other people at interest. They soon became rich and powerful.

Gold coins are heavy and awkward to carry around so the custom arose whereby the money-lenders would issue credit notes to depositors who began to trade these notes between themselves in commercial transactions. Paper money had come into existence.

A new form of usury developed as the swindling money-lenders realized the immoral benefits that could be obtained from such a situation. It became apparent to these thieves that they could go one step further than dishonestly using other people’s money for financial advantage at no cost to themselves. They could invent money from absolutely nothing. They could issue credit notes with nothing to back them up and put them into circulation as interest-bearing debts. No-one would be any the wiser. They calculated that they could safely issue notes for up to ten times more than the gold deposits they held, because the depositors would never ask for their deposits back all at the same time.

The principle of modern banking was thus established: invent money from nothing, put it into circulation as "running cash notes" that have to be paid back with real wealth that is produced from our labour, sit back and become unbelievably wealthy and powerful men: hidden rulers of nations.

In England this deceitful system was officially sanctioned in 1694. The usurper of the throne, William of Orange, had overthrown the legitimate King James II with the financial backing and plotting of powerful Jewish financiers in Amsterdam. In return he gave the sovereignty of England to a group of financiers by means of a Charter allowing them to call themselves the Bank of England. The Charter made no mention of issuing the nation’s money, but within minutes of signing the new Bank officials were discussing the form of their "running cash notes." The same system was adopted in every country by a process of Masonic revolution and manipulation.

FREEMASONRY AND COMMUNISM

http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/4176/g20boe.jpg

Socialist theorists and ideologues have never attacked the essential mechanism of capitalism. Although the injustices of the capitalist system have been attacked in volume after volume, and rightly so, they have never even hinted at the usury upon which the whole system is built and from which all the other injustices stem.

Perhaps this is because so many Communist leaders are Jewish. Most of the ‘Russian Revolutionists’ of 1917 were actually Jews from the lower east side of New York City. Two hundred and seventy-five of them were conveyed to Russia aboard the S.S. Christiana, led by Trotsky and financed by Kuhns, Loebs, Schiffs and Warburgs. This cosy circle of Jews and Freemasons financed both sides of the Great War.

Marx and Engels, two more Jews, wrote the Communist Manifesto on behalf of a secret society calling themselves ‘The League of Just Men.’ This secret society was an arm of the Illuminati, whose power and influence was the catalyst of the French Revolution. One of the founding members of the Illuminati was the House of Rothschild, the Jewish banking house which practically invented supra-nationalism for personal profit.

THE SITUATION TODAY

http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/7580/alistairdarlinggivefirs.jpg

Nowadays banking has become extremely sophisticated but the hidden and usurious mechanism behind it remains the same. After a big enquiry, hushed up as much as possible, the Bank of England was nationalised in 1946. In theory control of the Bank of England should then have passed from a group of private individuals to the British Government, but this is still not the case. Nationalisation only added a thin veneer of respectability.

The British Treasury, in conjunction with the Bank of England’s advisers to the Government, determine how much paper money and coin will be issued each year. This has to accord with the wealth of the nation for that year. But because banknotes and coins only account for a tiny percentage of financial transactions, it makes no difference to the bankers at all. Most financial transactions are carried out with abstract figures on a computer screen that have no relationship to real wealth. Everything has to be paid for at interest though – even when it doesn’t exist!

The Government still has to pay interest on old and new loans from the Bank. Only a few years ago it was announced that the interest debt on a loan taken during the Napoleonic War had just been paid off! This is where much of our tax money goes.

THE NEXT STAGE

http://www.motor-trade-insider.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/greedy-bankers.gif

The next stage of development for international finance is to get rid of cash altogether. Then the token accountability of the bankers will disappear along with the cash. Their intention is that everyone will have to use credit/debit cards for every type of commercial transaction.

Electronic technology, when used this way, and when it is not merely widespread but compulsory, will give them complete control of every man, woman and child in the world. If you cannot buy or sell – food, petrol, clothes – without a card you are completely at their mercy. If you lose the card or it doesn’t work for some reason you will suffer until issued with a replacement. If you make a protest against some particular injustice they could invalidate your card. The next time you go to the supermarket your card may not work. You won’t officially exist!

Who benefits from such a scheme? The politicians or the bankers? To ask the question is to answer it. The Bank of England is the real, but hidden, government of the country. The Government and the politicians are merely puppets controlled by the Bank – or, more accurately, the international banking families. None of our cowardly politicians dare stand up to these hidden and unelected rulers of the world, so powerful have they become. Two American presidents, possibly three, were assassinated for attempting to do so. It is far easier for them to submit to the system and enjoy a rich life than expose the real tyrants: tyrants who cause high taxes, unemployment, war, famine and misery for the rest of us. But these despots of the New World Order forget that Truth is more powerful than they could ever become. And Truth brings Justice!


The pen is mightier than the pound! This article first appeared in issue 5 of ‘The Anvil,’ published by The Third Position, BCM ITP, London, WC1N 3XX.

wakeupworld
10-08-2009, 12:41 AM
Brilliant, thanks for posting.

revolutionary_jam
10-08-2009, 03:48 PM
*thumbs up*

djhooker
10-08-2009, 04:59 PM
yep, the BofE have a lot to answer for.

curtaincat
11-08-2009, 02:03 PM
thanks joyful for this post.
i already sort of knew most of this but it is useful for the wage slaves who look down on the unemployed and dont have a clue. this thread should hopefully help them to wake up a bit :):)

lordzoma
12-08-2009, 08:28 AM
Here's something to think about. The more the dollar devalues, the easier it will be to repay your debt if you're being paid in a different currency, or if you've simply shorted the dollar on the Forex.

yozhik
12-08-2009, 11:40 AM
Here's something to think about. The more the dollar devalues, the easier it will be to repay your debt if you're being paid in a different currency, or if you've simply shorted the dollar on the Forex.

As long as your broker isn't a market maker and long USD ... in which case, if the shit hits the fan, the broker house may itself may get a margin call, and as per the Terms and Conditions, your account is their account and so your deposit is used to cover their losses ... :rolleyes:

Forex is great, as long as you know your broker is;
a) not playing against you in the market
b) has enough underlying capital and liquidity
c) does not have conditions which classify your deposits as their seposits, for purposes of meeting their trading obligations

striecx
13-08-2009, 11:38 PM
I actually think that the Fractional Reserve system and money are good inventions/technology/methods.

What I think has caused most problems is that these guys who were the first to exploit this power used it for their selfish needs and promoted Governments.
If governments didn't exist people would be able to unite and compete against the big established banks which only have their power because through governments laws and other social pressures and religions, people are forced to follow their laws, dogmas, use their products/services , and policies.
The elite establish and protect government, religion, media propaganda, school education because it serves their agenda for ultimate control and power.

The electronic way to do transactions is the natural evolution of the individuals purchasing method , because through the Fractional Reserve System the money supply will keep growing and growing.

The problem is that the Government centralizes all , and blocks anyone who wants to compete and place a more efficient and effective method that would compete with the Big Banks, which would force them to actually provide a better costumer service or financial service, or the sheeple will just go on to the bank that serves them better.
The government actually promotes centralized Monopoly and is only good for preventing people who want to create a good/ service to societyeffectively and efficiently.

runciter
14-08-2009, 07:48 AM
I actually think that the Fractional Reserve system and money are good inventions/technology/methods.

the fractional reserve system is a fraud, and money as we know it (debt-money) is a tool of control and enslavement.

banks are the problem, not governments, it's usury that is draining humanity of all its energies and riches (not only material).

yozhik
14-08-2009, 09:48 AM
banks are the problem, not governments

They're one and the same.
You don't have one without the other.

runciter
14-08-2009, 09:52 AM
They're one and the same.
You don't have one without the other.

no, you can have governments without banks.

yozhik
14-08-2009, 10:23 AM
no, you can have governments without banks.

Theoretically, of course.

I was referring to the current and past.
We have not had a separation of government and banks, or equally as important, governance and banks.

The two have been symbiotically attached for centuries.

runciter
14-08-2009, 10:36 AM
Theoretically, of course.

I was referring to the current and past.
We have not had a separation of government and banks, or equally as important, governance and banks.

The two have been symbiotically attached for centuries.

yes, and a government's first loyalty is to the bankers, for understandable reasons.

their power is make-believe, once enough people understand the game, it will be 'automatically' stopped.

flickflack
14-08-2009, 08:00 PM
Printing less money would slow down deflation. Possibly, printing new money all the time could be of less value than not doing it in a large scale.

I think nothing in this recession was staged intentionally from the beginning. That doesn't make much sense. Sometimes, stuff just happens.

yozhik
14-08-2009, 08:45 PM
Printing less money would slow down deflation. Possibly, printing new money all the time could be of less value than not doing it in a large scale.

I think nothing in this recession was staged intentionally from the beginning. That doesn't make much sense. Sometimes, stuff just happens.

flickflack ... please ... you can not be serious.
Do you know the history of the Great Depression?
You do know that was 100% designed and planned, don't you?

This "recession" is 100% planned.
There is nothing accidental about this; nothing at all.

"stuff just happens"???

:rolleyes:

striecx
14-08-2009, 09:20 PM
I'd rather have a bunch of banks competing in a free market using a Hard currency such as gold or silver as a standard of value, than just a government.

Since they wouldn't have government to protect their unfair transactions that protect those at the top of the pyramid anymore, they would actually have to compete to get people to use their banks.
People can always unite and set up their own banks if they feel the established big banks are colluding. This would force the Big banks to compete against each other, and progressively offer better service to its costumer and as peoples expectations get more sophisticated , force them to have more ethical practices or face losing market.

Government is the one that taxes your labour taking 50% to 95% of your pay. It is the one that makes laws that only favours those who are insiders on the countries policy creation process, at the expense of the regular people. It is the one that colludes with the fed to create boom and bust cycles in the economy that allow the big banks to confiscate wealth when the average person cannot pay their debt, and it is the one that offers big bailouts to the Big incompetent corporations and banks at the expense of the middle and lower class. And will keep doing it until all the wealth is in the hands of the few at the top.

tien an
14-08-2009, 09:24 PM
Printing less money would slow down deflation. Possibly, printing new money all the time could be of less value than not doing it in a large scale.

I think nothing in this recession was staged intentionally from the beginning. That doesn't make much sense. Sometimes, stuff just happens.

So; what does make sense then?
This?
"Sometimes, stuff just happens".

That must be the most ludicrous explanation for a recurring phenomenon that I've ever heard.
F**k me; I'd have (almost) swallowed the 'cyclic phases of banking' theory, rather than that...

tian an.

striecx
14-08-2009, 09:31 PM
But the above post is just ideals , the important thing is what actions can we take to prevent this system from continuing.

I would recommend using their own secret society ideas against them.
Create a secret society of enough people who trust each other and then coordinate at a specified time , An agorist economy or grey market economy.

This will mean that the government would stop receiving taxes from a group of people who have their own economy. Then recruit more people into this economy , making sure to have insiders in the police, government.

Remember what David Icke teaches: The top is there just because the Great majority the base (middle and lower class) hold them up there.

Just some ideas, hopefully some genius might get inspired and actually do something instead of just complaining, about how the Illuminati are raping them through every hole possible.

For now I think implementing an anarchy system of descentralized private corporations and banks and spreading the message is the best strategy to weaken and make the current system of slavery fail.